Chinese Journal of Catalysis ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 1535-1543.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63977-3
• Article • Previous Articles
Yu Dinga, Kai-Wen Caoa, Jia-Wei Hea, Fu-Min Lia, Hao Huangb,*(), Pei Chena, Yu Chena,#()
Received:
2021-10-29
Accepted:
2021-10-29
Online:
2022-06-18
Published:
2022-04-14
Contact:
Hao Huang, Yu Chen
Supported by:
Yu Ding, Kai-Wen Cao, Jia-Wei He, Fu-Min Li, Hao Huang, Pei Chen, Yu Chen. Nitrogen-doped graphene aerogel-supported ruthenium nanocrystals for pH-universal hydrogen evolution reaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2022, 43(6): 1535-1543.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.cjcatal.com/EN/10.1016/S1872-2067(21)63977-3
Fig. 2. Physical characterization of Ru-NCs/N-GA-900 nanocomposites. (a) SEM image; (b) high-resolution SEM image; (c) TEM image; (d) HRTEM image; (e) STEM-EDX elemental maps. Inset in (c): particle size distribution.
Fig. 5. Electrochemical performance of Ru-NCs/N-GA-900 nanocomposites and commercial 20 wt% Pt/C electrocatalyst in N2-saturated 1 mol/L KOH electrolyte. (a) LSV curves; (b) η10 values; (c) Tafel plots; (d) Nyquist plots at -0.01 V.
Catalyst | N-doping | Particle size | Ru content (wt%) |
---|---|---|---|
Ru-NCs/N-GA-900 | Yes | 2.3 ± 0.5 nm | 9.89 |
Ru-NCs/N-GA-1100 | Yes | 5 ± 0.6 nm | 10.25 |
Ru-NCs/N-GA-700 | Yes | 3.5 ± 0.6 nm | 10.22 |
Ru-NCs/GA-900 | No | 9 ± 0.9 nm | 10.01 |
Table 1 Physical characterization data of Ru-NCs/N-GA-700, Ru-NCs/N-GA-900, Ru-NCs/N-GA-1100, and Ru-NCs/GA-900 nanocomposites.
Catalyst | N-doping | Particle size | Ru content (wt%) |
---|---|---|---|
Ru-NCs/N-GA-900 | Yes | 2.3 ± 0.5 nm | 9.89 |
Ru-NCs/N-GA-1100 | Yes | 5 ± 0.6 nm | 10.25 |
Ru-NCs/N-GA-700 | Yes | 3.5 ± 0.6 nm | 10.22 |
Ru-NCs/GA-900 | No | 9 ± 0.9 nm | 10.01 |
Fig. 6. Electrochemical performance of the Ru-NCs/N-GA-700, Ru-NCs/N-GA-900, Ru-NCs/N-GA-1100, and Ru-NCs/GA-900 nanocomposites and commercial 20 wt% Pt/C electrocatalyst in N2-saturated 1 mol/L KOH electrolyte. (a) LSV curves; (b) η10 values.
Fig. 7. Durability of Ru-NCs/N-GA-900 nanocomposites and 20 wt% Pt/C electrocatalyst. (a) LSV curves before and after 10000 CV cycles in 1 mol/L KOH electrolyte; (b) Chronopotentiometric curves at 10 mA cm-2.
Fig. 8. HER performance of the Ru-NCs/N-GA-700, Ru-NCs/N-GA-900, Ru-NCs/N-GA-1100, Ru-NCs/GA-900 nanocomposites and commercial 20 wt% Pt/C electrocatalyst. (a) LSV curves; (b) η10 values in N2-saturated 1 mol/L HClO4 electrolyte.
Catalyst | Electrolyte | η10 (mV) | Year (Ref.) |
---|---|---|---|
Ru-NCs/N-GA-900 | 1 mol/L KOH | 36 | This work |
RuTe2 nanoparticles | 1 mol/L KOH | 45.1 | 2021[ |
RuNi nanoclusters | 1 mol/L KOH | 43 | 2021[ |
Macro/Meso RuC | 1 mol/L KOH | 58 | 2021[ |
PtRu alloy nanoparticles | 1 mol/L KOH | 59 | 2021[ |
Ru/C | 1 mol/L KOH | 62 | 2021[ |
Ru/carbon nanotubes | 1 mol/L KOH | 63 | 2021[ |
Ru/S-Ni2P nanosheets | 1 mol/L KOH | 49 | 2021[ |
Ruthenium-doped CoP | 1 mol/L KOH | 51 | 2021[ |
RuP2@C | 1 mol/L KOH | 78.9 | 2021[ |
Ru/NC-400 | 1 mol/L KOH | 39 | 2021[ |
Ru-doped Ni-Fe oxide bone | 1 mol/L KOH | 100 | 2021[ |
20 wt% Ru/C | 1 mol/L KOH | 41 | 2021[ |
Ni0.6Ru0.4@C | 1 mol/L KOH | 91 | 2020[ |
Ru-ZIF-900 | 1 mol/L KOH | 51.6 | 2020[ |
Ru-NiFe LDH | 1 mol/L KOH | 115.6 | 2020[ |
(Ru-Co) Ox nanoarrays | 1 mol/L KOH | 44.1 | 2020[ |
S-RuP nanoparticles | 1 mol/L KOH | 92 | 2020[ |
FeCoRuP arrays | 1 mol/L KOH | 43 | 2020[ |
PtRu bimetallic nanoparticles | 1 mol/L KOH | 95 | 2020[ |
Co-Ru-MoS2 nanosheets | 1 mol/L KOH | 52 | 2020[ |
RuxP nanowires | 1 mol/L KOH | 41 | 2020[ |
Ni5P4-Ru nanoparticles | 1 mol/L KOH | 54 | 2020[ |
Ru-NCs/N-GA-900 | 1 mol/L HClO4 | 52 | This work |
Ru-Ir nanoparticles | 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 | 60 | 2021[ |
Ru nanoparticles | 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 | 98 | 2021[ |
RuP2@C | 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 | 77.2 | 2021 [ |
Ru/NC-400 | 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 | 55 | 2021[ |
Ru boron-doped carbon | 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 | 85 | 2020[ |
Ru single atoms/Ti3C2Tx | 0.1 mol/L HClO4 | 70 | 2020[ |
Ru-CeO2 nanocomposite | 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 | 74 | 2020[ |
Ru/Ni3N-Ni | 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 | 53 | 2020[ |
RuNi/carbon quantum dots | 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 | 58 | 2020[ |
Table 2 HER performance of the Ru-based nanomaterials.
Catalyst | Electrolyte | η10 (mV) | Year (Ref.) |
---|---|---|---|
Ru-NCs/N-GA-900 | 1 mol/L KOH | 36 | This work |
RuTe2 nanoparticles | 1 mol/L KOH | 45.1 | 2021[ |
RuNi nanoclusters | 1 mol/L KOH | 43 | 2021[ |
Macro/Meso RuC | 1 mol/L KOH | 58 | 2021[ |
PtRu alloy nanoparticles | 1 mol/L KOH | 59 | 2021[ |
Ru/C | 1 mol/L KOH | 62 | 2021[ |
Ru/carbon nanotubes | 1 mol/L KOH | 63 | 2021[ |
Ru/S-Ni2P nanosheets | 1 mol/L KOH | 49 | 2021[ |
Ruthenium-doped CoP | 1 mol/L KOH | 51 | 2021[ |
RuP2@C | 1 mol/L KOH | 78.9 | 2021[ |
Ru/NC-400 | 1 mol/L KOH | 39 | 2021[ |
Ru-doped Ni-Fe oxide bone | 1 mol/L KOH | 100 | 2021[ |
20 wt% Ru/C | 1 mol/L KOH | 41 | 2021[ |
Ni0.6Ru0.4@C | 1 mol/L KOH | 91 | 2020[ |
Ru-ZIF-900 | 1 mol/L KOH | 51.6 | 2020[ |
Ru-NiFe LDH | 1 mol/L KOH | 115.6 | 2020[ |
(Ru-Co) Ox nanoarrays | 1 mol/L KOH | 44.1 | 2020[ |
S-RuP nanoparticles | 1 mol/L KOH | 92 | 2020[ |
FeCoRuP arrays | 1 mol/L KOH | 43 | 2020[ |
PtRu bimetallic nanoparticles | 1 mol/L KOH | 95 | 2020[ |
Co-Ru-MoS2 nanosheets | 1 mol/L KOH | 52 | 2020[ |
RuxP nanowires | 1 mol/L KOH | 41 | 2020[ |
Ni5P4-Ru nanoparticles | 1 mol/L KOH | 54 | 2020[ |
Ru-NCs/N-GA-900 | 1 mol/L HClO4 | 52 | This work |
Ru-Ir nanoparticles | 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 | 60 | 2021[ |
Ru nanoparticles | 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 | 98 | 2021[ |
RuP2@C | 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 | 77.2 | 2021 [ |
Ru/NC-400 | 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 | 55 | 2021[ |
Ru boron-doped carbon | 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 | 85 | 2020[ |
Ru single atoms/Ti3C2Tx | 0.1 mol/L HClO4 | 70 | 2020[ |
Ru-CeO2 nanocomposite | 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 | 74 | 2020[ |
Ru/Ni3N-Ni | 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 | 53 | 2020[ |
RuNi/carbon quantum dots | 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 | 58 | 2020[ |
|
[1] | Xiaohan Wang, Han Tian, Xu Yu, Lisong Chen, Xiangzhi Cui, Jianlin Shi. Advances and insights in amorphous electrocatalyst towards water splitting [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 51(8): 5-48. |
[2] | Chun Yin, Fulin Yang, Shuli Wang, Ligang Feng. Heterostructured NiSe2/MoSe2 electronic modulation for efficient electrocatalysis in urea assisted water splitting reaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 51(8): 225-236. |
[3] | Ce Han, Bingbao Mei, Qinghua Zhang, Huimin Zhang, Pengfei Yao, Ping Song, Xue Gong, Peixin Cui, Zheng Jiang, Lin Gu, Weilin Xu. Atomic Ru coordinated by channel ammonia in V-doped tungsten bronze for highly efficient hydrogen-evolution reaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 51(8): 80-89. |
[4] | Zhihan Yu, Chen Guan, Xiaoyang Yue, Quanjun Xiang. Infiltration of C-ring into crystalline carbon nitride S-scheme homojunction for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 50(7): 361-371. |
[5] | Bin Chen, Ya-Fei Jiang, Hai Xiao, Jun Li. Bimetallic single-cluster catalysts anchored on graphdiyne for alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 50(7): 306-313. |
[6] | Fangpei Ma, Qingping Tang, Shibo Xi, Guoqing Li, Tao Chen, Xingchen Ling, Yinong Lyu, Yunpeng Liu, Xiaolong Zhao, Yu Zhou, Jun Wang. Benzimidazole-based covalent organic framework embedding single-atom Pt sites for visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen evolution [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 48(5): 137-149. |
[7] | Qi-Ni Zhan, Ting-Yu Shuai, Hui-Min Xu, Chen-Jin Huang, Zhi-Jie Zhang, Gao-Ren Li. Syntheses and applications of single-atom catalysts for electrochemical energy conversion reactions [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 47(4): 32-66. |
[8] | Sue-Faye Ng, Xingzhu Chen, Joel Jie Foo, Mo Xiong, Wee-Jun Ong. 2D carbon nitrides: Regulating non-metal boron-doped C3N5 for elucidating the mechanism of wide pH range photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 47(4): 150-160. |
[9] | Ni Wang, Xue-Peng Zhang, Jinxiu Han, Haitao Lei, Qingxin Zhang, Hang Zhang, Wei Zhang, Ulf-Peter Apfel, Rui Cao. Promoting hydrogen evolution reaction with a sulfonic proton relay [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 45(2): 88-94. |
[10] | Diab khalafallah, Yunxiang Zhang, Hao Wang, Jong-Min Lee, Qinfang Zhang. Energy-saving electrochemical hydrogen production via co-generative strategies in hybrid water electrolysis: Recent advances and perspectives [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 55(12): 44-115. |
[11] | Junhao Yang, Lulu An, Shuang Wang, Chenhao Zhang, Guanyu Luo, Yingquan Chen, Huiying Yang, Deli Wang. Defects engineering of layered double hydroxide-based electrocatalyst for water splitting [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 55(12): 116-136. |
[12] | Ningning Wang, Shuo Wang, Can Li, Chenyang Li, Chunjiang Liu, Shanshan Chen, Fuxiang Zhang. ZrO2 modification of homogeneous nitrogen-doped oxide MgTa2O6-xNx for promoted photocatalytic water splitting [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 54(11): 220-228. |
[13] | Hui Su, Jing Jiang, Shaojia Song, Bohan An, Ning Li, Yangqin Gao, Lei Ge. Recent progress on design and applications of transition metal chalcogenide-associated electrocatalysts for the overall water splitting [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 44(1): 7-49. |
[14] | Xue Bai, Jingqi Guan. MXenes for electrocatalysis applications: Modification and hybridization [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2022, 43(8): 2057-2090. |
[15] | Chuqiang Huang, Jianqing Zhou, Dingshuo Duan, Qiancheng Zhou, Jieming Wang, Bowen Peng, Luo Yu, Ying Yu. Roles of heteroatoms in electrocatalysts for alkaline water splitting: A review focusing on the reaction mechanism [J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2022, 43(8): 2091-2110. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||