催化学报  2015, Vol. 36 Issue (4): 564-571   PDF (790 KB)    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
常平静
程海洋
林伟伟
李小汝
赵凤玉
A stable and active AgxS crystal preparation and its performance as photocatalyst
Pingjing Changa,b,c, Haiyang Chenga,b , Weiwei Lina,b, Xiaoru Lia,b,c, Fengyu Zhaoa,b     
a State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, Jilin, China;
b Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Process, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, Jilin, China;
c University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Abstract: AgxS crystals were synthesized via hydrothermal (AgxS-H) and in situ ion-exchange (AgxS-IE) methods. The samples were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, ultraviolet-visible-near infrared absorption spectroscopy, N2 adsorption-desorption, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and surface photovoltage measurements. The photocatalytic performance was investigated for the decomposition of methyl blue (MB) under visible light irradiation (λ ≥ 420 nm). The AgxS-H had smaller particles, wider band gap and weaker recombination of photoinduced charges than AgxS-IE, resulting in a higher photocatalytic activity. Moreover, AgxS-H was stable, and could be reused five times without loss of photocatalytic activity. Additionally, a possible pathway for the photocatalytic degradation of MB over AgxS has been proposed, that MB was oxidized mainly by hydroxyl radicals and partly via electron holes generated in the AgxS. AgxS-H is an efficient photocatalyst and has great potential for the degradation of harmful organic dyes in wastewater.
© 2015, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Silver sulfide     Visible light irradiation     Photocatalytic degradation     Organic pollutants     Band gap    
高效稳定的AgxS的制备及其光催化性能
常平静a,b,c, 程海洋a,b , 林伟伟a,b, 李小汝a,b,c, 赵凤玉a,b     
a 中国科学院长春应用化学研究所,电分析化学国家重点实验室,吉林长春 130022;
b 中国科学院长春应用化学研究所,绿色化学与过程实验室, 吉林长春 130022;
c 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
摘要:分别采用水热法(AgxS-H)和原位离子交换法(AgxS-IE)制备了AgxS. 采用扫描电镜(SEM)、X射线衍射光谱、紫外可见近红外吸收光谱、N2吸附-脱附、X射线光电子能谱和表面光电压测试对催化剂进行了表征. 以光(λ ≥ 420 nm)降解亚甲基蓝为模型反应, 考察了AgxS的光催化性能. 与AgxS-IE相比, AgxS-H具有较小的粒径、较大的禁带宽度、较低光生电荷复合率, 因此具有较高的光催化活性. 此外, AgxS-H还表现了较好的稳定性, 循环使用五次仍能够保持较高的光催化活性. 结果表明, AgxS光催化降解亚甲基蓝主要以羟基自由基氧化为主, 光生空穴氧化为辅的光催化氧化过程. AgxS-H作为一种有效的光催化剂, 在降解有机染料污水方面具有潜在的应用价值.
关键词AgxS     可见光照射     光催化降解反应     有机污染物     禁带宽度    

1. Introduction

In recent years, rapid development of industry has led to large amounts of industrial wastewater containing organic pollutants such as dyes, pharmaceuticals, and even pathogenic microorganisms being released into water sources, resulting in increasing numbers of regions around the world suffering from water supply problems [1, 2]. This has caused attention to be directed toward the treatment of wastewater containing textile dyes and other industrial dyestuffs, which include the largest groups of organic compounds that constitute an environmental problem. Many physical techniques, such as adsorption on activated carbon, ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis, coagulation by chemical agents, and ion exchange on synthetic adsorbent resins were used to remove dye pollutants [3]. However, these methods just transfer the dye pollutants from water to another phase, meaning the regeneration of the adsorbent materials and post-treatment of solid waste are necessary to prevent secondary pollution [4]. Conventional biological treatment methods are ineffective for the decolorization and degradation of highly aromatic dyes as they have been selected for their stability to these conditions [5, 6, 7, 8]. Thus, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have attracted attention during the last decade because of their ability to deal with a broad range of dyes in aqueous systems, through processes such as the Fenton and photo-Fenton catalytic reaction [9, 10, 11], H2O2/UV processes [12, 13] and TiO2 mediated photocatalysis [14, 15, 16, 17, 18]. Among the AOPs, photocatalysis has received increasing attention [19, 20, 21, 22, 23], with TiO2 being widely studied as a photocatalyst because of its nontoxicity, highly chemical stability, and low cost [24, 25]. However, TiO2 has poor solar efficiency (determined by its wide energy band-gap [3.2 eV]) and lower quantum yield (because of the rapid recombination of photo-generated electrons and holes) making practical applications difficult. To enhanc e the photocatalytic activity of TiO2, some modifications have been developed, such as doping with metals [26, 27] or non-metals [28, 29], coupling with other semiconductors [30], and adsorbing organic sensitizers [31, 32]. Most recently, Ag2S was found to be an important photocatalyst and useful in electronic devices because of its large absorption coefficient and a low energy band-gap (0.9-1.05 eV) [33, 34, 35]. It has been reported that Ag2S can catalyze the degradation of methyl orange in the presence of Ag as a co-catalyst under visible light irradiation [36]. Moreover, ternary Ag/Ag2S/Ag3CuS2 hollow microspheres have been reported to be more effective when compared with Ag/Ag2S, Cu2O, Cu7S4 and P25 for the photodegradation of methyl orange under visible light irradiation [37].

In this work, we fabricated two kinds of AgxS crystals using hydrothermal (AgxS-H) and in situ ion-exchange (AgxS-IE) methods. The microstructures and optical properties were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), ultraviolet-visible-near infrared (UV-Vis- NIR) absorption spectroscopy, N2 adsorption-desorption, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and surface photovoltage (SPV) measurements. The photocatalytic activity and stability of the AgxS-H were evaluated by the degradation of methyl blue (MB) under visible light irradiation (λ ≥ 420 nm). AgxS-H showed satisfactory photocatalysis efficiency and good stability, and could be recycled five times without loss of photocatalytic activity.

2. Experimental
2.1. Material preparation

AgNO3, L-cysteine (L-cys), CdS and methyl blue (MB) from the Beijing Chemical Reagent Cooperation (Beijing, China), were analytical grade and used without further purification.

AgxS-H was prepared by a hydrothermal route. In a typical procedure, 2.7 mmol of AgNO3 was dripped into a solution of 2.7 mmol of L-cysteine in 25 mL of distilled water with continuous stirring over 1 h. The resulting mixture was transferred into a 50-mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave. Then the reactor was sealed and heated to 180 °C for 10 h before being cooled to room temperature. The resulting precipitates were centrifuged and washed using deionized water and absolute ethanol several times, followed by drying at 60 °C for 6 h.

AgxS-IE was prepared by an in situ ion-exchange method. In a typical procedure, CdS (0.5 g) was dispersed in distilled water (50 mL) by ultrasonication for 0.5 h. AgNO3 (1.7 g) was dissolved in distilled water (50 mL) and dripped into the suspension. The mixed suspension was stirred at 70 °C for 12 h. Then, the resulting precipitates were centrifuged and washed with distilled water and absolute ethanol several times, and dried at 60 °C for 6 h.

2.2. Characterization

Powder XRD was performed using a D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) with a Cu Kα source at 40 kV and 40 mA. 2θ scans were performed from 10° to 90° at 4°/min. The morphology of the samples were characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), which was recorded on a XL30 ESEM microscope (Philips Electronics Co., Eindhoven, Netherlands) operated at a beam energy of 20 kV. UV-Vis-NIR absorption spectroscopy were recorded with a Varian Cary 500 spectrophotometer (Santa Clara, CA, USA), BaSO4 was used as the reference to eliminate background features. The specific surface area of sample was calculated using BET method (Autosorb Quantachrome 1MP, Boynton Beach, FL, USA) based on N2 adsorption-desorption isomer. XPS (Thermo ESCALAB 250, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to examine the electronic properties of the photocatalysts. The C 1s peak at 284.6 eV arising from adventitious carbon was used as the reference. This reference gives binding energy values with precision of ±0.2 eV.

The SPV system contained a source of monochromatic light, a lock-in amplifier (SR830-DSP, Stanford Research Systems, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) with a light chopper (SR540, Stanford Research Systems, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA), photovoltaic cell, and computer. A 500-W Xe lamp (CHFXQ500 W, Trusttech Co., Inc., Beijing, China) and double-prism monochromator (Zolix SBP500, Beijing, China) provided the monochromatic light. The samples were used as prepared for the SPV measurement, and the contacts between the samples and the indium tin oxide (ITO) electrode were non-ohmic during the measurements of the surface photovoltage. The photovoltaic cell was a sandwich-like structure of ITO-sample-ITO. The powdered sample was placed on the ITO electrode and compressed with another ITO electrode to obtain a film.

2.3. Photocatalytic activity measurement

The photocatalytic performance was evaluated by the degradation of methyl blue (MB) with the photocatalyst (10 mg) suspended in 30 mL of MB solution (10 mg·L−1). The reactor was fixed in position, with an irradiated area of 13.8 cm2. First, the mixed solution was stirred for 30 min in the dark to allow any preliminary adsorption to equilibrate. The photocatalytic reaction was initiated with the visible light irradiation from a 300 W Xe lamp (CEL-HXUV 300, Beijing CHN EDU AuLight Co., Beijing, China). Wavelengths less than 420 nm were removed by an optical filter (UVCUT 420, Beijing CHN EDU AuLight Co., Beijing, China), giving a visible light irradiation region of 420-800 nm. At 20-min intervals, about 500 µL of the reaction mixture was withdrawn, and the composition of the mixture was analyzed after dilution and decantation. The concentration of MB was monitored by UV-Vis spectroscopy via the absorbance of the characteristic peak at 665 nm. These concentrations are denoted C, where C refers to the concentration of MB at a given interval time and C−30 refers to the initial concentration of MB (10 mg·L−1) at time −30 min. After the adsorption equilibrium over the AgxS-H and AgxS-IE catalysts for 30 min, the concentration of MB was taken as C0.

3. Results and discussion
3.1. Characterization of silver sulfide

Two kinds of AgxS crystals were prepared by hydrothermal (AgxS-H) and ionic exchange (AgxS-IE) methods. As shown in Fig. 1, the diffraction peaks for both AgxS-H and AgxS-IE could be indexed as monoclinic Ag2S (JCPDS 14-0072). The sizes of both the AgxS samples estimated from XRD patterns were around 20-30 nm. The morphology and structure of the as-prepared AgxS were characterized by SEM, and the images are shown in Fig. 2. The particle sizes were above 100 nm for both the AgxS-H and AgxS-IE samples, but the AgxS-H particles were the smaller. The particle size as observed by SEM is much larger than that calculated from the XRD patterns, because the size obtained from XRD results is crystallite size whereas the particles observed in the SEM images contain many crystallites aggregated together. The larger particle size in the AgxS-IE sample results in a smaller surface area, as seen by the BET measurement that gave the specific surface areas of AgxS-H and AgxS-IE as 2.55 and 1.27 m2·g−1, respectively. The surface areas for both samples are very small and similar; thus we propose that the surface area or particle size has only a small effect on the photocatalytic activity. The optical properties of AgxS were investigated using UV-Vis-NIR techniques (Fig. 3). The spectra of both samples showed a broad absorption covering the entire visible light region, while the absorbance edge of the AgxS-H sample was shorter than the AgxS-IE sample, indicating a difference in the electron structure of these two catalysts, which may affect their photocatalytic activity.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of AgxS-H and AgxS-IE.

Fig. 2. SEM images of AgxS-H and AgxS-IE.

Fig. 3. UV-Vis-NIR absorption spectra of AgxS-H and AgxS-IE.

To further evaluate the composition, XPS spectra of the AgxS were collected as shown in Fig. 4. For the Ag 3d spectrum of AgxS-IE, the peaks at the binding energy of 367.4 and 373.4 eV were assigned to the Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 orbitals of Ag+, and the peaks at 368.0 and 374.0 eV assigned to the Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2 orbitals of Ag0 [36]. For AgxS-H, the Ag+ peaks were observed at the same binding energies as the above sample, but the Ag0 peaks were shifted to 368.4 and 374.5 eV. The S 2p spectra had peaks at the binding energies of 160.1 eV (S 2p3/2) and 161.3 eV (S 2p1/2), which were ascribed to monosulphide (S2−) for both AgxS-H and AgxS-IE. The peaks around 163.1 eV (S 2p3/2) and 164.4 eV (S 2p1/2) for AgxS-IE were assigned to polysulphides (Sn2−) [38], however, these Sn2− peaks where shifted to 162.5 and 164.0 eV in AgxS-H. Therefore, differences in the polysulphide species present in both AgxS-H and AgxS-IE should affect the electronic structures, which should in turn affect the photocatalytic activities.

Fig. 4. XPS spectra of Ag 3d (a) and S 2p (b) of AgxS-H and AgxS-IE.
3.2. Photocatalytic performance of AgxS-H and AgxS-IE

The photocatalytic performances of AgxS-H and AgxS-IE were explored in the degradation of MB under visible light irradiation at room temperature. First, the absorptive capacities of the AgxS-H and AgxS-IE catalysts were evaluated by keeping the degradation system in the dark for 30 min to achieve an adsorption equilibrium. The degradation reaction was performed under visible light irradiation and, at a given time interval, the concentration of MB was measured by the UV-Vis absorption spectra. The results are shown in Fig. 5(a). Across the effective concentration range of the Lambert-Beer law, the real-time concentration variation of MB (C/C−30, C−30 = 10 mg·L−1) is proportional to the normalized absorption value (A/A−30, λ = 665 nm). For comparison, the photocatalytic performance of AgxS-IE was also investigated and is shown in Fig. 5(b). It is clear that both AgxS-H and AgxS-IE exhibited excellent photocatalytic activity in the degradation of MB. Moreover, the photocatalytic activity of AgxS-H was much higher than that of AgxS-IE. This may be ascribed to the wider band gap and the weaker recombination of photoinduced charges which should be the most important factor in the photocatalytic efficiency, which is discussed further in Section 3.4.

Fig. 5. (a) UV-Vis absorbance spectra of MB over AgxS-H at different reaction intervals; (b) Photocatalytic performance of AgxS-H and AgxS-IE in the degradation of MB under visible light irradiation at room temperature.

Furthermore, when we prolonged the reaction time, the photocatalytic efficiency (C/C−30) of MB over AgxS-H reached 99% at 2 h. Moreover, the bulk solution at this time was completely colorless or transparent. To confirm the degree of mineralization, the final products were identified by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy (HPLC-MS). There was almost no MB, and no organic molecule or organic intermediates were detected, when comparing with pure MB, indicating MB had been degraded into inorganic compounds.

Generally, the photocatalytic oxidation of organic dye pollutants follows first-order kinetics which can be expressed as follows: ln(C0/C) = kapp·t, where kapp is the apparent rate constant (min−1), C0 is the concentration of MB after the absorption equilibrium for 30 min (mg·L−1), and C is the concentration at a given reaction time interval (mg·L−1). According to Fig. 5(b), the reaction followed first-order kinetics. A linear relationship between ln(C0/C) and reaction time is shown in Fig. 6(a), confirming the degradation of MB over AgxS-H follows first order kinetics. For the degradation of MB, the apparent rate constant kapp was calculated and shown in Fig. 6(b). The kapp for AgxS-H is 2.63 × 10−2 min−1, and this is larger than the kapp of AgxS-IE (1.44 × 10−2 min−1).

Fig. 6. The kinetic curves (a) and estimated kapp (b) for the degradation of MB over different photocatalysts.
3.3. Reusability of AgxS-H

Stability is a greatly important factor when considering a heterogeneous catalyst for a practical application. In general, metal sulfide compounds suffer from photocorrosion, as the material is oxidized by its own photogenerated holes (M2Sx + h+ → Mx+ + S), especially in aqueous solution [39, 40]. Here, the photostability of AgxS-H was checked in the degradation of MB under visible light irradiation. After first run, the catalyst was separated by centrifugation at 12000 r/min, washed three times with distilled water, and reused in the next run. The results are shown in Fig. 7(a). The photocatalytic efficiency (C/C0) was 89% for the first run, and was still 86.7% for the fifth run, indicating that the photocatalytic activity of AgxS-H was quite stable without obvious decrease during recycling. Fig. 7(b) presents the XRD patterns of the fresh and used AgxS-H photocatalyst. The crystal phase and the structure of AgxS-H did not change after five runs, indicating that the AgxS crystal is stable during the photocatalytic degradation process.

Fig. 7. (a) The recycling results of AgxS-H in the photodegradation of MB; (b) XRD patterns of the fresh and used AgxS-H after five runs.
3.4. Proposed mechanism of the photocatalytic degradative process

The band edge positions of photocatalysts are of particular importance in the photocatalytic reaction. In the present work, the band edge potentials of the catalysts were estimated using an equation related to the Mulliken electronegativity. Here, the electronegativity (EE) of an atom is the arithmetic mean of the atomic electron affinity (EA) and the first ionization energy (IE) [41]. The CB edge position of an uncharged semiconductor can be calculated according to the empirical equation [41, 42]: ECB = χ - Ee - 0.5 Eg, where ECB is the CB edge potential, χ is the electronegativity of the semiconductor (SE, the geometric mean of the electronegativity of the constituent atoms), Ee is the energy of free electrons on the hydrogen scale (~4.5 eV), Eg is the band gap energy of the semiconductor, which was determined by the Tauc equation (ahν = A( - Eg)n), where a is the absorption coefficient measured as a function of photon energy hν, and A is a constant factor determined by the transition probability), and n is a number that depends on the type of transition. The transitions of Ag2S are allowed and direct, which means the Tauc equation requires n = 1/2 for each material. Therefore, a straight-line fit of a plot of (ahv)2 versus hν gives the Tauc equation, as shown in Fig. 8. The value at the intersection of the tangent line and the horizontal axis is the band gap Eg [43]. The band gap is affected by the crystallite size, phase transition, and semiconductor components. The crystallite sizes in AgxS-H and AgxS-IE were similar (20-30 nm), and much bigger than the Bohr exciton radius of this material (~2.2 nm) [44], so the crystallite size will only have a small effect on the band gap. Phase transitions in crystals can change the band gap. It has been reported that a series of structural phase transitions of Ag2S can induce noticeable changes in electrical transport parameters, resulting in the change of the band gap of Ag2S [45]. However, the XRD patterns reported here for both AgxS-H and AgxS-IE were similar, indicating the two samples had the same phase, which means they should have very similar band gaps. In contrast, nonstoichiometric semiconductors may have different band gap structures compared with the stoichiometric equivalent material [46, 47]. The band gap of reduced TiO2 has been reported to be narrower than that of the bulk TiO2, with a miniband appearing just below the bottom of the conducting band and the width of this band is related to the concentration of the Ti3+ or oxygen vacancy [46]. The Ag:S mole ratio of both AgxS-H and AgxS-IE were estimated by ICP measurement as 0.87 and 1.24, respectively, which is much lower than the stoichiometric ratio of bulk Ag2S. This difference in the Ag:S mole ratio is large enough to be significant and may well affect the band gap. The effect of the Ag:S mole ratio is very complicated and it is being studied further in our lab. The AgxS-H and AgxS-IE samples have Eg of 1.03 and 0.97 eV, respectively, which are larger than the bandgap of Ag2S (0.92 eV). The Ag:S ratio less than 2 is most likely because of the existence of polysulphide species in these samples. The VB edge potential (EVB) can be determined using EVB = ECB + Eg. The CB and VB potentials determine the samples’ reductive and oxidative ability [48]. Based on the above equations, the ECB and EVB were calculated, and the results are listed in Table 1. ECB was more cathodic for AgxS-H (0.23 eV), while EVB (1.26 eV) was more anodic when compared with AgxS-IE, for which the ECB was 0.26 eV and the EVB was 1.23 eV. Therefore, AgxS-H is a stronger reducing agent when forming superoxide ions (•O2−). Moreover, the photogenerated holes of AgxS-H are more able to oxidize MB when compared with AgxS-IE [37]. Consequently, AgxS-H exhibited the higher photocatalytic efficiency than AgxS-IE in the degradation of MB.

Fig. 8. Tauc’s plot for AgxS-H (a) and AgxS-IE (b).

Table 1
Band energies calculated for AgxS-H and AgxS-IE from data in Fig. 7.

The transfer behavior of the photoinduced charge carriers was investigated by SPV measurements. The photovoltic signal represents the difference in the surface potential barriers before and after illumination, which in turn is caused by the separation of photoinduced charge carriers. Therefore, the strength of the SPV signal determines the amount of light absorbed and the transport of excess carriers in a semiconducting material [49, 50, 51]. Fig. 9 displays the SPV spectra of the samples. Each sample showed a positive signal in the range of 300-800 nm, with AgxS-H exhibiting a much stronger SPV response. This suggested that the light absorbing region of the two catalysts is the same, and that the photoinduced electrons migrate from the surface to the bulk and the photoinduced holes move to the surface forming better separated exciton pairs in AgxS-H. This means that the recombination of electro-hole pairs of AgxS-H is weaker than in AgxS-IE, leading to enhanced photocatalytic activity.

Fig. 9. Surface photovoltage spectra of samples.

Based on the above analysis, a possible pathway for the degradation of MB over AgxS has been proposed. As shown in Scheme 1, the present MB degradation over AgxS under the visible light irradiation is mainly because of oxidation of MB with •OH, which is produced from water or oxygen, and partly because of electron holes generated in AgxS. This is in agreement with the literature, where Ganguli et al. [52] discussed the photodegradation process of MB over ZnO/Ag2S with various active species scavengers and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, they analyzed the active species such as hydroxyl radicals (•OH), electrons (e), holes (h+), and superoxide radical anions (•O2−). They concluded that the MB oxidation proceeded mainly through the reaction with •OH, and partly via the generated electron holes (h+).

Scheme 1. Possible photocatalytic mechanism for AgxS under visible light irradiation.
4. Conclusions

The AgxS-H crystals fabricated by a hydrothermal method was found to be more efficient in the photocatalysis of MB degradation under visible light irradiation, because it has a wider band gap and weaker recombination of photoinduced charges than AgxS-IE, prepared by in-situ ion-exchange. AgxS-H exhibited high stability, remaining active after being reused five times. The hydroxyl radicals appear to be the key factor in the photo-degradation of MB over AgxS under visible light irradiation. The AgxS crystals developed in this work have potential applications in the treatment or degradation of organic dyes by exposing the wastewater to sunlight.

Acknowledgments We thank Prof. Tengfeng Xie from Jilin University for the helps in surface photovoltage measurements and Prof. Yihang Guo from Northeast Normal University for the helps in UV-Vis-NIR absorption spectra measurements.

References
[1] Hou Y, Li X Y, Zhao Q D, Chen G H, Raston C L. Environ Sci Technol, 2012, 46: 4042
[2] Shannon M A, Bohn P W, Elimelech M, Georgiadis J G, Marinas B J, Mayes A M. Nature, 2008, 452: 301
[3] Meshko V, Markovska L, Mincheva M, Rodrigues A E. Water Res, 2001, 35: 3357
[4] Cooper P. J Soc Dyers Colour, 1993, 109: 97
[5] Patil S S, Shinde V M. Environ Sci Technol, 1988, 22: 1160
[6] Moore A T, Vira A, Fogel S. Environ Sci Technol, 1989, 23:403
[7] Correia V M, Stephenson T, Judd S J. Environ Technol, 1994, 15: 917
[8] Arslan I, Balcioglu I A. Dyes Pigments, 1999, 43: 95
[9] Wu F, Deng N S, Zuo Y G. Chemosphere, 1999, 39: 2079
[10] Kang S F, Liao C H, Po S T. Chemosphere, 2000, 41: 1287
[11] Balanosky E, Fernandez J, Kiwi J, Lopez A. Water Sci Technol, 1999, 40: 417
[12] Arslan I, Balcioglu I A, Tuhkanen T. Environ Technol, 1999, 20: 921
[13] Ince N H, Gonenc D T. Environ Technol, 1997, 18: 179
[14] Kuo W S, Ho P H. Chemosphere, 2001, 45: 77
[15] Zhang F L, Zhao J C, Shen T, Hidaka H, Pelizzetti E, Serpone N. Appl Catal B, 1998, 15: 147
[16] Qu P, Zhao J C, Shen T, Hidaka H. J Mol Catal A, 1998, 129: 257
[17] Galindo C, Jacques P, Kalt A. Chemosphere, 2001, 45: 997
[18] Tang W Z, An H. Chemosphere, 1995, 31: 4157
[19] Konstantinou I K, Albanis T A. Appl Catal B, 2004, 49: 1
[20] Pelaez M, Nolan N T, Pillai S C, Seery M K, Falaras P, Kontos A G, Dunlop P S M, Hamilton J W J, Byrne J A, O'Shea K, Entezari M H, Dionysiou D D. Appl Catal B, 2012, 125: 331
[21] Chong M N, Jin B, Chow C W K, Saint C. Water Res, 2010, 44: 2997
[22] Wu P G, Xie R C, Imlay J A, Shang J K. Appl Catal B, 2009, 88: 576
[23] Rizzo L, Sannino D, Vaiano V, Sacco O, Scarpa A, Pietrogiacomi D. Appl Catal B, 2014, 144:369
[24] Chen X, Mao S S. Chem Rev, 2007, 107: 2891
[25] Fujishima A, Rao T N, Tryk D A. J Photochem Photobiol C, 2000, 1: 1
[26] Tong T Z, Zhang J L, Tian B Z, Chen F, He D N. J Hazard Mater, 2008, 155: 572
[27] Tian B Z, Li C Z, Gu F, Jiang H B, Hu Y J, Zhang J L. Chem Eng J, 2009, 151: 220
[28] Asahi R, Morikawa T, Ohwaki T, Aoki K, Taga Y. Science, 2001, 293: 269
[29] Niu Y X, Xing M Y, Tian B Z, Zhang J L. Appl Catal B, 2012, 115: 253
[30] Zhao W, Ma W H, Chen C C, Zhao J C, Shuai Z G. J Am Chem Soc, 2004, 126: 4782
[31] Bae E Y, Choi W Y, Park J W, Shin H S, Kim S B, Lee J S. J Phy Chem B, 2004, 108: 14093
[32] Zou W W, Zhang J L, Chen F. Mater Lett, 2010, 64: 1710
[33] Xie Y, Heo S H, Kim Y N, Yoo S H, Cho S O. Nanotechnology, 2010, 21: 015703
[34] Neves M C, Nogueira J M F, Trindade T, Mendonca M H, Pereira M I, Monteiro O C. J Photochem Photobiol A, 2009, 204: 168
[35] Hwang I, Seol M, Kim H, Yong K. Appl Phys Lett, 2013, 103: 023902
[36] Yang W L, Zhang L, Hu Y, Zhong Y J, Wu H B, Lou X W. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2012, 51: 11501
[37] Xing C S, Zhang Y, Wu Z D, Jiang D L, Chen M. Dalton Trans, 2014, 43: 2772
[38] Smart R S C, Skinner W M, Gerson A R. Surf Interface Anal, 1999, 28:101
[39] Chen Z, Liu S Q, Yang M Q, Xu Y J. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2013, 5: 4309
[40] Bao N Z, Shen L M, Takata T, Domen K. Chem Mater, 2008, 20: 110
[41] Butler M A, Ginley D S. J Electrochem Soc, 1978, 125: 228
[42] Netherco A H. Phys Rev Lett, 1974, 33: 1088
[43] Huxter V M, Mirkovic T, Nair P S, Scholes G D. Adv Mater, 2008, 20: 2439
[44] Zhang Y J,Liu Y S, Li C Y, Chen X Y, Wang Q B. J Phys Chem C, 2014, 118: 4918
[45] Zhang J K, Liu C L, Zhang X, Ke F, Han Y H, Peng G, Ma Y Z, Gao C X. Appl Phys Lett, 2013, 103: 082116
[46] Zuo F, Wang L, Wu T, Zhang Z Y, Borchardt D, Feng P Y. J Am Chem Soc, 2010, 132: 11856
[47] Wang H K, Dou K P, Teoh W Y, Zhan Y W, Hung T F, Zhang F H, Xu J Q, Zhang R Q, Rogach A L. Adv Funct Mater, 2013, 23: 4847
[48] Hagfeldt A, Gratzel M. Chem Rev, 1995, 95: 49
[49] Zhang X, Zhang L Z, Xie T F, Wang D J. J Phys Chem C, 2009, 113: 7371
[50] Gross D, Mora-Seró I, Dittrich T, Belaidi A, Mauser C, Houtepen A J, Da Como E, Rogach A L, Feldmann J. J Am Chem Soc, 2010, 132: 5981
[51] Fan H M, Jiang T F, Li H Y, Wang D J, Wang L L, Zhai J L, He D Q, Wang P, Xie T F. J Phys Chem C, 2012, 116: 2425
[52] Khanchandani S, Srivastava P K, Kumar S, Ghosh S, Ganguli A K. Inorg Chem, 2014, 53: 8902