催化学报  2015, Vol. 36 Issue (9): 1552-1559   PDF (626 KB)    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
贾玉庆
刘海超
Selective hydrogenolysis of sorbitol to ethylene glycol and propylene glycol on ZrO2-supported bimetallic Pd-Cu catalysts
Yuqing Ji, Haichao Liu     
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, State Key Laboratory for Structural Chemistry of Stable and Unstable Species, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Abstract: Sorbitol is one of the key building blocks in catalytic conversion of biomass, and its selective hydrogenolysis to ethylene glycol and propylene glycol provides a viable and sustainable route towards the synthesis of the two glycols. Herein, the hydrogenolysis of biomass-derived sorbitol was studied on Pd-modified Cu/monoclinic zirconia (Pd-Cu/ZrO2) catalysts with a wide range of Cu/Pd atomic ratios in the presence of La(OH)3. The bimetallic Pd-Cu/ZrO2 catalysts showed superior activities and selectivities to the two target glycols, compared with the monometallic Cu/ZrO2 and Pd/ZrO2 catalysts under identical conditions. At nearly 100% sorbitol conversion, a combined selectivity of 61.7% to ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, and glycerol was obtained on Pd-Cu/ZrO2 (Cu/Pd=5) at 493 K under 5.0 MPa H2. Pd-Cu/ZrO2 was also stable and recyclable, in contrast to Cu/ZrO2, which suffered severe deactivation because of agglomeration of Cu particles during sorbitol hydrogenolysis. Clearly, the presence of Pd improved not only the activity and selectivity of the Cu catalyst, but also the hydrothermal stability. Characterization of these catalysts by X-ray diffraction, diffuse-reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy of CO adsorption, and H2 temperature-programmed reduction suggests that the Cu particles deposited on the Pd surfaces with close contact and strong interaction between the two metals, most likely involving electron transfer from Pd to Cu. Such structural and electronic effects are proposed as the critical contributors to the significant promoting effect of Pd on the activity and stability of Pd-Cu catalysts in sorbitol hydrogenolysis. These findings provide useful information for design of new Cu-based catalysts with higher efficiency and stability for selective hydrogenolysis of polyols and other biomass-derived reactants under hydrothermal conditions.
© 2015, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Selective hydrogenolysis     Sorbitol     Ethylene glycol     Propylene glycol     Bimetallic palladium-copper catalyst    
氧化锆负载Pd-Cu双金属催化剂上山梨醇选择性氢解合成乙二醇和丙二醇
贾玉庆, 刘海超     
北京大学化学与分子工程学院, 北京分子科学国家实验室, 分子动态与稳态结构国家重点实验室, 北京100871
摘要: 山梨醇和木糖醇等多元醇是可再生生物质转化合成液体燃料和化学品的重要平台分子, 其中, 可通过选择氢解反应一步制备乙二醇和丙二醇等重要化工原料, 有望代替从乙烯和丙烯制备二元醇的传统石油化工工艺. 目前文献中多元醇氢解反应主要使用Ru基和Ni基催化剂等, 但是不可避免地生成C-C键非选择性断裂的副产物甲烷等. 与之相比, 非贵金属Cu基催化剂往往具有较优异的选择性, 但其活性较低和水热稳定性较差. 因此, 到目前为止研制具有高活性和选择性、以及良好水热稳定性的Cu基催化剂用于生物质基多元醇氢解反应仍然存在挑战. 在本文中, 我们采用贵金属修饰的方法提高Cu基催化剂在山梨醇选择氢解反应中的活性和水热稳定性.
通过分步浸渍法合成了1%Pd-3%Cu/ZrO2、1%Pt-3%Cu/ZrO2和1%Ru-3%Cu/ZrO2双金属催化剂, 并比较了它们在山梨醇氢解反应中的催化性能. 在相同的反应条件下, 上述催化剂中1%Pd-3%Cu/ZrO2 (Cu/Pd=5)具有最优的活性及乙二醇、丙二醇和甘油的总选择性. 以固体碱La(OH)3为助剂, 1%Pd-3%Cu/ZrO2的山梨醇氢解活性高达20.3 h-1, 是单金属1%Pd/ZrO2 (8.7 h-1)和3%Cu/ZrO2 (6.5 h-1)催化剂活性的2-3倍, 也高于含有相同Pd、Cu含量的1%Pd/ZrO2和3%Cu/ZrO2机械混合体系的活性(12.2 h-1). 而且, Pd-Cu/ZrO2双金属催化剂对C2-C3低碳多元醇的选择性也明显优于Pd/ZrO2和Cu/ZrO2以及二者的机械混合体系. 这些结果说明Pd对Cu/ZrO2的促进作用不仅仅需要Pd与Cu两种金属的共同存在, 还需要它们两者之间的相互作用. 进一步发现, Pd-Cu/ZrO2双金属催化剂在Cu/Pd比为1.5-10.0的较宽范围内都表现出了较高的反应活性(17.8-20.3 h-1)以及乙二醇、丙二醇和甘油的总选择性(57.3%-62.8%), 说明较低含量Pd的存在就能够有效地改善Cu催化剂的催化性能. 在493 K和5.0 MPa H2的反应条件下, 以1%Pd-3%Cu/ZrO2为催化剂, 在山梨醇接近完全转化时, 获得了61.7%的乙二醇、丙二醇和甘油的总选择性.
同时, Pd的加入还能有效地抑制水热反应条件下Cu粒子的团聚, 使得Pd-Cu/ZrO2催化剂在山梨醇氢解反应中具有优良的水热稳定性和循环使用性能. 在5次循环实验中1%Pd-3%Cu/ZrO2的活性和选择性基本保持不变; X-射线粉末衍射结果表明, 反应后的催化剂上未观察到Cu的特征衍射峰, Cu粒子仍然保持良好的分散状态. 而对于没有Pd修饰的单金属3%Cu/ZrO2催化剂, 经5次循环使用后山梨醇氢解反应的活性则下降了42%; 在循环反应中Cu粒子显著地聚集而长大到 ~30 nm.
CO吸附漫反射红外光谱结果揭示了Cu粒子倾向于在Pd粒子表面沉积, 随着Cu/Pd原子比的增大, Cu粒子逐渐稀释并覆盖Pd的表面位点, 说明Pd与Cu粒子之间存在紧密的接触. 氢气程序升温还原结果表明, 可能与氢溢流有关, Pd的加入促进了CuO的还原. 然而, 不同于Pd/ZrO2和Cu/ZrO2机械混合样品的TPR图谱, 其显示PdO和CuO各自的还原峰, Pd-Cu双金属催化剂则只存在一个宽化的还原峰, 这说明了Pd-Cu之间结构上的紧密接触使得两种金属之间存在强相互作用, 其中可能存在从Pd向Cu的电子转移. 综合这些结构和电子效应, 可以推测Pd的存在促进了Cu粒子对山梨醇的脱氢能力和不饱和中间体的加氢能力, 进而提高了Cu基催化剂在山梨醇氢解反应中的活性及目标产物的选择性. 同时Pd-Cu之间的强相互作用和氢溢流效应抑制了Cu粒子在水热反应条件下的聚集, 提高了催化剂的稳定性. 这些结果和认识有助于指导人们为多元醇氢解和其它生物质基化学品的转化反应设计具有更高效率和水热稳定性的新型Cu基催化剂.
关键词: 选择性氢解     山梨醇     乙二醇     丙二醇     钯-铜双金属催化剂    

1. Introduction

There is an increasing interest worldwide in utilizing renewable biomass for sustainable production of liquid fuels and chemicals [5, 6]. As such, biomass-derived sorbitol and xylitol have been intensively studied as the key platform molecules, especially for synthesis of various value-added chemicals via different catalytic routes [19, 20]. One such example is selective hydrogenolysis of sorbitol and xylitol to ethylene glycol and propylene glycol [7], the two important glycols that are currently manufactured from multistep reactions of petroleum-derived ethylene and propylene [8].

Selective hydrogenolysis of sorbitol and xylitol to ethylene glycol and propylene glycol has been explored on Ru-, Ni-, and Cu-based catalysts in the presence of base additives. Sun et al. [9] studied the xylitol hydrogenolysis on Ru/C with Ca(OH)2 at 473 K under 4.0 MPa H2, reaching ∼61% combined selectivity to ethylene glycol and propylene glycol with near-complete conversion of xylitol. Using CaO as a promoter, Zhou et al. [10] reported 85.7% sorbitol conversion and 60.8% combined selectivity to ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, and glycerol on carbon nanofiber-supported Ru catalyst at 493 K under 8.0 MPa H2. Alternatively, Ye et al. [11] obtained 55%-60% selectivity to ethylene glycol and propylene glycol with >90% sorbitol conversion on Ce-promoted Ni/Al2O3 catalysts with a small amount of Ca(OH)2. Chen et al. [7, 9] carried out sorbitol hydrogenolysis on a co-precipitated Ni-MgO catalyst, and observed 80.8% combined selectivity to ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, and glycerol at 67.8% sorbitol conversion at 473 K under 4.0 MPa H2. Sun et al. [20, 21] found that Ni-CeO2/C and Ni-CaO/C were efficient for xylitol hydrogenolysis, and achieved 69.5% combined selectivity to ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, and glycerol at nearly 100% xylitol conversion on Ni-CaO/C without additional bases. These studies show that the Ru- and Ni-based catalysts exhibit good activities and selectivities to the two target glycols from sorbitol and xylitol hydrogenolysis [13, 14, 22, 23]. However, these materials also catalyze cleavage of C-C bonds to form undesirable by-products, especially methane [13, 14], as also reported for glycerol hydrogenolysis [14].

Different from the aforementioned Ru and Ni catalysts, Cu is less active toward C-C bond cleavage in polyol hydrogenolysis [8, 11, 24]. This promising feature of Cu has been confirmed by Huang et al. [22], who recently studied xylitol hydrogenolysis on Cu-SiO2 catalysts. They observed close to 100% conversion and 70.4% combined selectivity to ethylene glycol and propylene glycol at 473 K under 6.0 MPa H2 in the presence of Ca(OH)2. However, sintering of Cu particles and deactivation occurred during xylitol hydrogenolysis, even in the presence of Ca(OH)2 [25], which can normally prevent the agglomeration and leaching of non-noble metal particles [23]. Moreover, Cu-based catalysts generally exhibit activities that are inferior to those of Ru and Ni catalysts. Therefore, it is of great importance to design Cu catalysts that show improved efficiency and high stability under the hydrothermal conditions of polyol hydrogenolysis.

For this purpose, a variety of oxides including Al2O3 [26], Ga2O3 [27], and B2O3 [28] have been employed to stabilize copper particles in glycerol hydrogenolysis. However, these catalysts still undergo deactivation over a prolonged reaction time. Recently, Kim et al. [13, 14] found that addition of Pd enhances the activity of CuCr2O4 in glycerol hydrogenolysis via hydrogen spillover. Jin et al. [7] reported a graphene-supported Cu-Pd catalyst with excellent recyclability in glycerol conversion to lactic acid. These reports show the potential of the noble metals to increase the activity and stability of Cu catalysts.

In the present work, we studied Cu/monoclinic zirconia (Cu/ZrO2) catalysts for sorbitol selective hydrogenolysis in the presence of La(OH)3. The effect of noble metals including Pd, Pt, and Ru on the catalytic property of the Cu particles was examined, and Pd-Cu/ZrO2 exhibited high activities and selectivities with enhanced reusability. The promoting effect of Pd on the Cu catalysts is discussed on the basis of the complementary characterization by X-ray diffraction (XRD), diffuse-reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy of CO adsorption (CO-DRIFT), and H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR).

2. Experimental
2.1. Catalyst preparation

ZrO2-supported Pd, Ru, and Pt catalysts were prepared by incipient wetness impregnation of monoclinic ZrO2 (Alfa Aesar) with aqueous solutions of [Pd(NH3)4](NO3)2 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MO, United States), RuCl3·nH2O (GR, Sinopharm Chemical, Beijing, China), and H2PtCl6·nH2O (GR, Sinopharm Chemical), respectively. The impregnated samples were dried at room temperature for 12 h and then at 393 K overnight. Afterward, the samples were calcined in flowing air at 673 K for 3 h. The loading of the supported noble metal was 1 wt%.

Cu/ZrO2 and bimetallic M-Cu/ZrO2 (M=Pd, Ru, or Pt) catalysts were prepared by an impregnation method, similar to that described above for ZrO2-supported noble metals. The ZrO2 support and the calcined M/ZrO2 samples were impregnated with aqueous solutions of Cu(CH3COO)2·H2O (GR, Sinopharm Chemical). The impregnated samples were dried at ambient temperature until most of the water was evaporated and then at 393 K overnight. Afterward, the samples were calcined in flowing air at 623 K for 2 h, and then reduced in a 20% H2/N2 (Beijing Haipu) flow at 673 K for 2 h. The resulting Cu/ZrO2 and M-Cu/ZrO2 catalysts were denoted as xCu/ZrO2 and 1M-xCu/ZrO2, respectively, where x represents a Cu loading of x wt% in the catalyst and 1 M indicates 1 wt% noble metal in the catalyst. Pd-Cu/ZrO2 catalysts with different Cu/Pd atomic ratios of 1.5, 3.0, 5.0, 8.0, and 10.0 were prepared by adjusting the amount of Cu(CH3COO)2 in the impregnation solutions while the Pd loading was kept constant at 1 wt%.

2.2. Catalyst characterization

XRD patterns of the catalysts were collected on a Rigaku D/MAX-2400 diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm) in the range of 20°-60° at a scanning rate of 2°/min. The operation voltage and current were 40 kV and 100 mA.

H2-TPR experiments were conducted on a TP-5080 flow unit (Tianjin Xianquan). A catalyst portion of about 50 mg (25 mg for 1Pd-6Cu/ZrO2) was placed in a quartz cell, and heated from 295 to 1073 K at 10 K/min in a 5% H2/N2 (Beijing Haipu, certified mixture) flow (30 mL/min). H2 consumption was quantified by thermal conductivity detector signals, calibrated by reduction of CuO powder under identical conditions.

CO-DRIFTS experiments were carried out on a Bruker Tensor 27 spectrometer equipped with liquid nitrogen-cooled HgCdTe detector and a diffuse-reflectance reaction chamber with CaF2 windows. The spectral resolution was 4 cm−1 and 100 scans were applied for each measurement. The pre-reduced catalyst was added to the chamber and treated in situ in a 5% H2/N2 flow at 673 K for 1 h in case of any surface oxidation. The sample was then flushed with N2 for 30 min at 493 K before cooling to room temperature under N2 flow. The background spectrum of the sample was recorded in N2 at room temperature. Afterward, the sample was exposed to a 5% CO/He (Beijing Haipu, certified mixture) flow (20 mL/min) for 30 min. The chamber was then purged with N2 for 20 min before the spectrum was recorded. All spectra were obtained by subtracting the background spectrum of each sample.

2.3. Sorbitol hydrogenolysis reaction

Sorbitol hydrogenolysis reactions were carried out in a stainless steel autoclave (100 mL) with vigorous stirring at 750 r/min to avoid the mass-transfer effect. Typically, 50 g of 10 wt% sorbitol (98%, Alfa Aesar) aqueous solution, the specified amount of Cu catalyst, and 0.2 g of La(OH)3 (AR, Sinopharm Chemical) were loaded into the autoclave. The reaction was maintained at 493 K under 5.0 MPa H2 for 4 h. The catalyst and liquid phase were separated by filtration after the reaction. The reactants and products in the liquid phase were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (Shimadzu LC-20A) using Bio-Rad Aminex HPX-87H and HPX-87C columns connected to refractive index detectors. Gas products, mainly methane, were analyzed by gas chromatography (Shimadzu 2010, HJ-OV-101 column) with flame ionization detection. Activities in the sorbitol reaction were calculated by the molar sorbitol conversion per mole of metal loaded per hour (h−1), and product selectivities were reported on a carbon basis.

3. Results and discussion
3.1. Activity and selectivity of bimetallic Pd-Cu catalysts in sorbitol hydrogenolysis

Table 1 shows the activities (normalized to total metal atoms) and selectivities for sorbitol hydrogenolysis on monometallic Cu/ZrO2 and Pd/ZrO2 and bimetallic Pd-Cu/ZrO2, Pt-Cu/ZrO2, and Ru-Cu/ZrO2 catalysts in the presence of La(OH)3 at 493 K under 5.0 MPa H2. 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2 exhibited an activity of 20.3 h−1, which was 2-3 times greater than those of monometallic 3Cu/ZrO2 (6.5 h−1) and 1Pd/ZrO2 (8.7 h−1) in the kinetic controlled regime. The lower activity of 1Pd/ZrO2 is consistent with the finding in glycerol hydrogenolysis by Xia et al. [7, 14] that monometallic Pd0.04/Mg5.56Al2O8.56 is less active than bimetallic Pd0.04Cu0.4/Mg5.56Al2O8.56. 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2 was also more selective for the target glycols (ethylene glycol and propylene glycol) than the two monometallic catalysts. Including glycerol, the combined selectivity to the three polyol products was 61.5% on 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2, which was much higher than those on 3Cu/ZrO2 and 1Pd/ZrO2, being 45.0% and 38.8%, respectively. Other products included lactic acid, sorbitol epimers (mannitol and iditol) as well as insignificant C5 and C4 polyols (arabitol, xylitol, 1,2-butanediol, erythritol, and threitol). Notably, no methane was detected in the gas phase of these reactions. Using 3Cu/ZrO2, acetol (4.2%) was also detected together with a high selectivity to lactic acid (16.7%), reflecting the inferior hydrogenation activity of Cu particles [22, 23]. The selectivity to lactic acid decreased significantly to 7.9%, and no acetol was observed on 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2. Such change in t he selectivities shows that the addition of Pd improved the hydrogenation activity of the Cu catalyst, most likely because of its excellent H2 activation ability. Consequently, the formation of propylene glycol was favored from the glyceraldehyde-derived intermediate, which would otherwise undergo metal-catalyzed partial hydrogenation to acetol or base-catalyzed benzilic acid rearrangement to lactic acid [29].

For comparison, the effects of Ru and Pt on the Cu catalyst were also examined under identical conditions (Table 1). However, the activity only increased slightly from 6.5 h−1 on 3Cu/ZrO2 to 7.2 h−1 on 1Ru-3Cu/ZrO2 and 10.7 h−1 on 1Pt-3Cu/ZrO2, which are much lower than that observed for 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2. The combined selectivity to ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, and glycerol was 56.5% and 55.3%, respectively, on 1Ru-3Cu/ZrO2 and 1Pt-3Cu/ZrO2, which were also lower than that on 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2. Clearly, Pd is superior to Ru and Pt for promoting the activity and selectivity of the Cu catalyst in sorbitol hydrogenolysis. Although the reason for the different effects of the three noble metals needs to be clarified, it may be related to their different interactions with Cu. The interaction of Pd with Cu is confirmed by the results with a physical mixture of 1Pd/ZrO2 and 3Cu/ZrO2 (Table 1). The activity of this physical mixture was 12.2 h−1, which is much lower than that on 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2 (20.3 h−1), implying that the promoting effect of Pd is not just a result of the coexistence of Cu and Pd, but requires interaction of the two metals.

Table 1
Activity and product selectivity in sorbitol hydrogenolysis on monometallic Cu/ZrO2 and Pd/ZrO2 catalysts and various bimetallic Cu-based catalysts.

Notably, the promoting effect of Pd was observed over a wide range of Cu/Pd atomic ratios of 1.5, 3.0, 5.0, 8.0, and 10.0 on Pd-Cu/ZrO2. As shown in Table 2, compared at ~30% sorbitol conversion in the kinetic controlled regime, the activities (normalized to total metal atoms) varied slightly between 17.8 and 20.3 h−1, irrespective of the Cu/Pd ratios, at 493 K under 5.0 MPa H2. Similarly, with Cu/Pd ratio increasing from 1.5 to 5.0, the combined selectivities to ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, and glycerol remained essentially constant (around 61.5%-62.8%) and was still as high as 57.3% at the high Cu/Pd ratio of 10.0. Moreover, these Pd-Cu/ZrO2 catalysts retained such high selectivities at high sorbitol conversions. For example, a 61.7% combined selectivity to ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, and glycerol was achieved at ~100% conversion on 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2 at 493 K under 5.0 MPa H2.

Table 2
Activity and product selectivity in sorbitol hydrogenolysis on bimetallic Pd-Cu/ZrO2 catalysts with different Cu/Pd ratios.

For the Cu-based catalysts, the ease with which the Cu particles aggregate under hydrothermal conditions to deactivate the catalyst is a significant problem. Thus, the recyclability of the Pd-Cu/ZrO2catalysts was examined. Fig. 1(a) shows representative results for 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2 in the kinetic controlled regime of sorbitol hydrogenolysis at 493 K under 5.0 MPa H2. During the recycling experiments, the used catalyst was collected by simple filtration and washed thoroughly with deionized water. No significant decline in the sorbitol conversion (maintained at ~34%) was observed after five successive cycles. The selectivities to ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, and lactic acid decreased slightly from 16.3%, 36.8%, and 7.9% in the first run, to 14.5%, 35.4%, and 3.8% in the second run, respectively. Concurrently, the selectivity to glycerol increased slightly from 8.4% to 12.6%. Then the selectivities remained essentially unchanged in the following cycles. These results demonstrate that 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2 is stable and reusable under the reaction conditions employed in this work. For comparison, the reusability of 3Cu/ZrO2 was also tested under identical conditions. As shown in Fig. 1(b), the selectivities to ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerol and lactic acid remained essentially unaltered on Cu/ZrO2 for the five successive cycles. However, the sorbitol conversions decreased sharply from 28.7% in the first run to 20.4% in the second run, and continuously to 16.5% in the fifth run, showing the instability of the monometallic Cu/ZrO2 catalyst under hydrothermal conditions, even in the presence of La(OH)3 base. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the introduction of Pd into Cu/ZrO2 improves not only the activity and selectivity of the Cu particles, but also their stability, most likely as a result of the strong interaction of Pd with Cu and the consequent effect on the structural and electronic properties of the Cu particles.

Fig. 1. Sorbitol conversions and selectivities to ethylene glycol (EG), propylene glycol (PG), glycerol (Gly), and lactic acid (LA) in five successive reaction cycles of sorbitol hydrogenolysis on 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2 catalyst (a) and 3Cu/ZrO2 catalyst (b). Reaction conditions: 493 K, 5.0 MPa H2, 10 wt% sorbitol aqueous solution 50 g, 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2 0.2 g or 3Cu/ZrO2 0.6 g, La(OH)3 0.2 g in the first run and La(OH)3 0.1 g in runs 2–5, 4 h.
3.2. Interaction between Cu and Pd in Pd-Cu/ZrO2 catalysts

Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of 1Pd/ZrO2, Cu/ZrO2, and Pd-Cu/ZrO2 catalysts after reduction in H2 at 673 K in the 2θ range of 35°-50°. The characteristic diffraction peaks of the ZrO2 support were present for all the samples. No peaks corresponding to Pd were detected for the 1Pd/ZrO2 and Pd-Cu/ZrO2 catalysts, suggesting that the Pd particles were highly dispersed on ZrO2 with such a low Pd loading of 1 wt% used in this work. Similarly, no characteristic peaks of metallic Cu were observed on fresh 3Cu/ZrO2 and Pd-Cu/ZrO2 catalysts, even with a high Cu/Pd atomic ratio of 10.0, implying high dispersion of Cu on ZrO2 for these fresh monometallic and bimetallic catalysts. For catalysts with higher Cu content, a weak diffraction signal for Cu (2θ = 43.4°) was detected for monometallic 6Cu/ZrO2 catalyst, but not for 1Pd-6Cu/ZrO2. This result suggests that the addition of Pd can improve the dispersion of Cu particles on ZrO2, especially for Cu catalysts with high Cu loadings.

Fig. 2. XRD patterns of freshly reduced samples. (1) 1Pd/ZrO2; (2) 1Pd-0.9Cu/ZrO2; (3) 1Pd-1.8Cu/ZrO2; (4) 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2; (5) 1Pd-4.8Cu/ZrO2; (6) 1Pd-6Cu/ZrO2; (7) 3Cu/ZrO2; (8) 6Cu/ZrO2.

Fig. 3. XRD patterns of 3Cu/ZrO2 (1), 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2 (2), a physical mixture of 1Pd/ZrO2 and 3Cu/ZrO2 (3) after sorbitol hydrogenolysis reaction at 493 K under 5.0 MPa H2.

To examine the stability of the Cu/ZrO2 and Pd-Cu/ZrO2 catalysts, especially their Cu particles, La(OH)3 base was replaced with MgO-Al2O3 (Mg/Al atomic ratio=3/1) in sorbitol hydrogenolysis. This allowed a clear spectral window to observe the peak of Cu at around 2θ = 43.4°, which would otherwise be obscured by the intense peaks (2θ = 43.0°, 43.9°) of lanthanum carbonate hydroxide (LaCO3OH), formed by reaction of La(OH)3 with the CO2 formed in polyol hydrogenolysis [29, 30]. As presented in Fig. 3, a sharp peak appeared at 2θ = 43.4° for the used 3Cu/ZrO2 catalyst, showing agglomeration of the Cu particles during sorbitol hydrogenolysis under the hydrothermal conditions applied in this work. The Cu particle size was estimated to be 30 nm by the Scherrer equation. This phenomenon is in line with previous findings [31]. Such a dramatic increase in the size of Cu particles after the reaction can explain the sharp decrease in the activity of 3Cu/ZrO2 during the recycling experiments (Fig. 1(b)). For the representative 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2 catalyst, however, no characteristic Cu peak was detected after the hydrogenolysis reaction. Such stability of the Cu particles suggests a strong interaction between Pd and Cu, which efficiently prevents the agglomeration of Cu particles under the hydrothermal conditions, and consequently leads to the observed stable sorbitol conversions on 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2 during the five successive cycles (Fig. 1(a)).

Figure 4 shows the DRIFT spectra of adsorbed CO on the monometallic Pd and Cu catalysts and the bimetallic Pd-Cu catalysts after treatment in H2 at 673 K. For the monometallic 1Pd/ZrO2 catalyst, a band at 2079 cm−1 was assigned to the linear adsorption of CO on the Pd surfaces. Other spectral features at 1800-2000 cm−1, the broad band at around 1958 cm−1, and a shoulder at 1855 cm−1 were attributed respectively to bridging and multi-bonded CO species on Pd [32]. These bands were dramatically attenuated for 1Pd-1.8Cu/ZrO2, and only an extremely weak band of linearly adsorbed CO on the Pd sites was observed for 1Pd-6Cu/ZrO2 with a high Cu/Pd ratio of 10.0. Such phenomena, especially the decrease in the intensities of the bridging and multi-bonded CO bands on the Pd sites with increasing Cu/Pd ratios, are consistent with previous findings for bimetallic Pd-Cu catalysts [33], and are likely the result of dilution or coverage of the Pd ensembles with the Cu sites. Concurrent with such change, a new intense band appeared at around 2106 cm−1 for the bimetallic catalysts, resembling the single peak observed for monometallic 3Cu/ZrO2 catalyst in terms of both intensity and shape. A band in the range of 2100-2110 cm−1 has been previously assigned to the linear adsorption of CO on metallic Cu0 sites on Cu/ZrO2 catalysts [33, 34]. Therefore, this intense band can be also tentatively assigned to linearly adsorbed CO species on the metallic Cu0 sites of Pd-Cu/ZrO2. Based on these results, we envisaged that Cu was deposited on the Pd particles for the Pd-Cu/ZrO2 catalysts, and most of the Pd surfaces were covered with Cu at the high Cu/Pd ratios, such as 1Pd-6Cu/ZrO2. Taken together with the observed stability of the Pd-Cu catalysts and their superior activity in sorbitol hydrogenolysis, such close contact between Cu and Pd particles should lead to strong interaction between them for these Pd-Cu catalysts, as indeed evidenced from their H2-TPR results (see below).

Fig. 4. DRIFT spectra of CO adsorption on 1Pd/ZrO2 (1), 1Pd-1.8Cu/ZrO2 (2), 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2 (3), 1Pd-6Cu/ZrO2 (4) and 3Cu/ZrO2 (5).

Figure 5 shows the H2-TPR profiles for monometallic Pd/ZrO2 and Cu/ZrO2 and bimetallic Pd-Cu/ZrO2 after treatment in air at 623 K. For 1Pd/ZrO2, the main peak centered at around 374 K was assigned to the reduction of PdO, which closely interacts with the ZrO2 support [35]. The peak at ~563 K corresponds to the reduction of ZrO2 [29, 36, 37]. Such improved reduction of ZrO2 may be caused by the promoting effect of PdO on the mobility of the lattice oxygen on the ZrO2 surface, or because of hydrogen spillover from Pd to ZrO2, as generally found on other ZrO2-supported noble metal catalysts [38]. For 3Cu/ZrO2, two major reduction peaks were observed at around 423 and 435 K. The first peak was assigned to the highly dispersed CuO phase, which closely interacts with ZrO2, whereas the second peak was ascribed to the reduction of CuO, which has weaker interaction with ZrO2 [30, 36]. Compared with 1Pd/ZrO2 and 3Cu/ZrO2, only a broader single peak appeared at 384 K for 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2, which increased from 376 to 415 K as the Cu loading increased from 1.8 to 6.0 wt% (i.e., the Cu/Pd atomic ratio from 3.0 to 10.0). Apparently, the presence of Pd enhanced the reducibility of the Cu species, which is indicative of the close contact and strong interaction between Cu and Pd in the Pd-Cu catalysts.

Fig. 5. H2-TPR profiles of 1Pd/ZrO2 (1), 1Pd-1.8Cu/ZrO2 (2), 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2 (3), 1Pd-6Cu/ZrO2 (4), the 1:1 (wt/wt) physical mixture of 1Pd/ZrO2 and 3Cu/ZrO2 (5) and 3Cu/ZrO2(6).

The reduction features of the Pd-Cu catalysts could be also associated with the effect of H2 spillover, which is derived from the dissociation of H2 to H atoms on Pd, and their subsequent spillover to the Cu surfaces [7]. To examine such an effect, the H2-TPR profile for the 1:1 (wt/wt) physical mixture of 1Pd/ZrO2 and 3Cu/ZrO2 was collected. As shown in Fig. 5, this sample presents two peaks at 378 and 432 K, corresponding to the reduction of PdO and CuO species, respectively. The presence of Pd indeed improved the reducibility of the Cu species as a result of the H2 spillover. However, the reduction feature is different from those for bimetallic Pd-Cu catalysts, which further confirms the strong interaction between Pd and Cu in Pd-Cu/ZrO2 catalysts. Such a difference can account for the observed difference in their activities. As shown in Table 1, the physical mixture of 1Pd/ZrO2 (0.2g) and 3Cu/ZrO2 (0.2g) had an activity of 12.2 h−1, obviously higher than the weighted average activity (6.9 h−1), which is derived from the activities for the two individual components (0.2 g 1Pd/ZrO2 and 0.2 g 3Cu/ZrO2) tested separately. Such enhanced activity of the physical mixture might be a result of Cu particle growth being inhibited by the addition of 1Pd/ZrO2 via hydrogen spillover during sorbitol hydrogenolysis. This physical mixture also possessed higher stability, as confirmed by its XRD pattern, which showed no agglomeration of the Cu particles after sorbitol hydrogenolysis (Fig. 3). The combined selectivity of the physical mixture to ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, and glycerol was 56.1%, which is higher than that for 1Pd/ZrO2 (38.8%) and 3Cu/ZrO2 (45.0%). Furthermore, compared with 3Cu/ZrO2, the physical mixture showed a lower selectivity to lactic acid (16.7% vs 9.0%) and no detectable formation of acetol. These results show the physical mixture of 1Pd/ZrO2 and 3Cu/ZrO2 possessed higher hydrogenation activity than its two individual components as a result of hydrogen spillover. This is in accordance with the finding for hydrogenation of nitrate using a physical mixture of Pd/C and Cu/C catalysts [38]. However, as discussed in Section 3.1, the physical mixture is much less efficient than the 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2 catalyst in terms of activity and selectivity in sorbitol hydrogenolysis with the same amount of Pd and Cu.

Clearly, these results reveal that the observed superior activity, selectivity, and stability of the bimetallic Pd-Cu catalysts are caused by close contact between Pd and Cu particles and their strong interaction, which involves electron transfer from Pd to Cu [30,36]. This electronic effect consequently facilitates sorbitol dehydrogenation, which is the rate-determining step in the hydrogenolysis reaction, and subsequent hydrogenation steps toward the formation of the target glycols on the Cu surface [7].

4. Conclusions

Bimetallic Pd-Cu/ZrO2 catalysts show significantly higher activities and selectivities than monometallic Pd/ZrO2 and Cu/ZrO2catalysts in sorbitol hydrogenolysis to ethylene glycol and propylene glycol in the presence of La(OH)3. A combined selectivity of 61.7% to ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, and glycerol at ~100% sorbitol conversion was obtained at 493 K under 5.0 MPa H2 on 1Pd-3Cu/ZrO2 (Cu/Pd=5). The presence of Pd in Pd-Cu/ZrO2 catalysts prevents agglomeration of Cu particles and leads to high catalyst stability and recyclability in sorbitol hydrogenolysis under hydrothermal conditions. Such a remarkable promoting effect of Pd on the activity and stability of the Pd-Cu catalysts is considered to be directly related to the close contact and strong interaction between the two metals, most likely involving electron transfer from Pd to Cu. These findings may be beneficial to the design of new Cu-based catalysts with high efficiency and hydrothermal stability for different reactions of polyols and other biomass-derived feedstocks.

References
[1] Ruppert A M, Weinberg K, Palkovits R. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2012, 51: 2564
[2] ten Dam J, Hanefeld U. ChemSusChem, 2011, 4: 1017
[3] Ma J P, Yu W Q, Wang M, Jia X Q, Lu F, Xu J. Chin J Catal(马继平, 于维强, 王敏, 贾秀全, 路芳, 徐杰.催化学报), 2013, 34: 492
[4] Besson M, Gallezot P, Pinel C. Chem Rev, 2014, 114: 1827
[5] Melero J A, Iglesias J, Garcia A. Energ Environ Sci, 2012, 5: 7393
[6] Zhang J, Li J B, Wu S B, Liu Y. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2013, 52: 11799
[7] Sun J Y, Liu H C. Green Chem, 2011, 13: 135
[8] Zhao L, Zhou J H, Sui Z J, Zhou X G. Chem Eng Sci, 2010, 65: 30
[9] Ye L M, Duan X P, Lin H Q, Yuan Y Z. Catal Today, 2012, 183: 65
[10] Chen X G, Wang X C, Yao S X, Mu X D. Catal Commun, 2013, 39: 86
[11] Sun J Y, Liu H C. Catal Today, 2014, 234: 75
[12] Sotak T, Schmidt T, Hronec M. Appl Catal A, 2013, 459: 26
[13] Huang Z W, Chen J, Jia Y Q, Liu H L, Xia C G, Liu H C. Appl Catal B, 2014, 147: 377
[14] Liu H L, Huang Z W, Xia C G, Jia Y Q, Chen J, Liu H C. ChemCatChem, 2014, 6: 2918
[15] Banu M, Sivasanker S, Sankaranarayanan T M, Venuvanalingam P. Catal Commun, 2011, 12: 673
[16] Leo I M, Granados M L, Fierro J L G, Mariscal R. Chin J Catal(催化学报), 2014, 35: 614
[17] Zhou J H, Liu G C, Sui Z J, Zhou X G, Yuan W K. Chin J Catal(周静红, 刘国才, 隋志军, 周兴贵, 袁渭康.催化学报), 2014, 35: 692
[18] Deutsch K L, Lahr D G, Shanks B H. Green Chem, 2012, 14: 1635
[19] Yue H R, Zhao Y J, Ma X B, Gong J L. Chem Soc Rev, 2012, 41: 4218
[20] Li Y M, Ma L, Liu H M, He D H. Chin J Catal(李宇明, 马兰, 刘会敏, 贺德华.催化学报), 2014, 35: 677
[21] Wang S, Yin K H, Zhang Y C, Liu H C. ACS Catal, 2013, 3: 2112
[22] Wang S, Liu H C. Chin J Catal(王帅, 刘海超.催化学报), 2014, 35: 631
[23] Zhu S H, Gao X Q, Zhu Y L, Zhu Y F, Zheng H Y, Li Y W. J Catal, 2013, 303: 70
[24] van Haasterecht T, Ludding C C I, de Jong K P, Bitter J H. J Catal, 2014, 319: 27
[25] Bienholz A, Blume R, Knop-Gericke A, Girgsdies F, Behrens M, Claus P. J Phys Chem C, 2011, 115: 999
[26] Kim N D, Park J R, Park D S, Kwak B K, Yi J. Green Chem, 2012, 14: 2638
[27] Jin X, Dang L N, Lohrman J, Subramaniam B, Ren S Q, Chaudhari R V. ACS Nano, 2013, 7: 1309
[28] Xia S X, Yuan Z L, Wang L N, Chen P, Hou Z Y. Appl Catal A, 2011, 403: 173
[29] Lesiak M, Binczarski M, Karski S, Maniukiewicz W, Rogowski J, Szubiakiewicz E, Berlowska J, Dziugan P, Witonska I. J Mol Catal A, 2014, 395: 337
[30] Sitthisa S, Pham T, Prasomsri T, Sooknoi T, Mallinson R G, Resasco D E. J Catal, 2011, 280: 17
[31] Wang L C, Liu Q, Chen M, Liu Y M, Cao Y, He H Y, Fan K N. J Phys Chem C, 2007, 111: 16549
[32] Xu Z Y, Chen L Q, Shao Y, Yin D Q, Zheng S R. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2009, 48: 8356
[33] Chen L F, Wang J A, Valenzuela M A, Bokhimi X, Acosta D R, Novaro O. J Alloys Compd, 2006, 417: 220
[34] Huang H, Li W Z, Liu H C. Catal Today, 2012, 183: 58
[35] Ko J B, Bae C M, Jung Y S, Kim D H. Catal Lett, 2005, 105: 157
[36] Fox E B, Velu S, Engelhard M H, Chin Y H, Miller J T, Kropf J, Song C S. J Catal, 2008, 260: 358
[37] Kugai J, Miller J T, Guo N, Song C S. J Catal, 2011, 277: 46
[38] Yoshinaga Y, Akita T, Mikami I, Okuhara T. J Catal, 2002, 207: 37