催化学报  2016, Vol. 37 Issue (1): 3-15   PDF (966 KB)    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Nanzhe Jiang
Abhishek Burri
Sang-Eon Park
Ethylbenzene to styrene over ZrO2-based mixed metal oxide catalysts with CO2 as soft oxidant
Nanzhe Jianga,b, Abhishek Burrib, Sang-Eon Parkb     
a Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Yanbian University, Yanji 133002, Jilin, China;
b Laboratory of Nano-Green Catalysis, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Inha University, Incheon 402-751, Republic of Korea
Abstract: ZrO2-based mixed metal oxide catalysts for the industrially important dehydrogenation process of ethylbenzene to styrene monomer have been explored by our group for the past 20 years. These efforts were subjected to the activation of CO2 over mixed metal oxide catalysts and resulted in several promising benefits to the dehydrogenation processes, such as stabilized conversion and selectivity, suppressed coke formation and commercially-acceptable longevity. In this review, we summarize the most recent developments on ZrO2-based mixed metal oxide catalysts, including the further optimization of sol-gel process in the synthesis of catalysts, rationalizing acid-base properties by doping, co-operative properties between redox and acid-base active sites and additional promoters towards the effective improvement of the longevity of catalysts.
© 2016, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Oxidative dehydrogenation     Carbon dioxide activation     Zirconia-based mixed oxide     Acid-base properties     Redox properties    
ZrO2基复合金属氧化物催化剂上CO2温和氧化乙苯制苯乙烯
Nanzhe Jianga,b, Abhishek Burrib, Sang-Eon Parkb     
a 延边大学化学工程与技术系, 吉林延吉133002;
b 仁荷大学化学工程与技术系纳米绿色催化实验室, 仁川402-751, 韩国
摘要:苯乙烯(SM)是聚合物化学中最重要的单体之一,由其生产的聚合物产品(如PS,SBR和ABS等)具有独特的性能,因而SM的需求逐年增加.乙苯(EB)催化脱氢工艺提供了90%的SM需求,该过程在K促进的氧化铁催化剂上于600-650℃进行.这是一个吸热且体积增大的反应,因此需要绝热反应器和大量的过热过饱和蒸汽以提供热量和降低反应分压,从而有利于反应平衡向SM方向移动,也可避免或消除积碳.同时,也造成大量潜热被浪费;热点也降低了整个反应活性和催化剂寿命.在蒸汽中加入空气或富氧空气,使得副产H2与O2反应,产生的热量可供随后乙苯脱氢反应,同时H2的移除也有利于提高EB单程转化率,并保持高的SM选择性.但是,该过程需要2个催化剂,反应器的设计和催化剂的装填比较复杂,且存在爆炸的危险.因此,人们尝试了多种氧化剂和新型的催化剂.最近也有人提出软氧化剂的概念.这为开发新催化体系提供了可能.
相对于O2,CO2的氧化性很弱,但可用作温和氧化剂去除脱氢单元中副产的H2,降低了反应温度,且不影响反应活性和选择性;同时,具有较大的经济性和环保性,在工业上也是切实可行的.除了负载型的碱金属促进的氧化铁催化剂外,各种金属或金属氧化物也用于催化CO2氧化EB脱氢反应中,如Fe,Cr,V和La的氧化物为活性金属,碳材料、MgO、SiO2、Al2O3、Ga2O3、ZrO2、TiO2、水滑石类化合物及分子筛为载体.Park课题组研究了Fe,V和Cr基催化剂,即设计氧化还原的催化剂表面以解离CO2,产生的O用于逆水汽反应.其中以Al2O3负载的V和V-Sb氧化物催化剂性能最为突出;但存在积碳失活和V物种的深度还原等问题.为了进一步提高催化剂性能,该课题组开发了多种ZrO2基复合氧化物催化剂,包括MnO2-ZrO2, TiO2-ZrO2, CeO2-ZrO2和SnO2-ZrO2.这些催化剂具有酸碱特性,在反应中表现出较高的催化性能.因此,本文简要总结了用于CO2氧化EB脱氢反应的ZrO2基催化剂最新研究进展.
研究发现,在CO2氧化EB脱氢制SM反应中,CO2在提高催化剂活性和稳定性方面起着非常重要的作用,可被定义为软氧化剂:氧化催化剂表面以保持其表面氧含量,移除催化剂表面产生的积碳和副产物H2,为反应体系提供较高的热容以克服反应平衡限制,从而达到较高的转化率.ZrO2基复合金属氧化物是具有改善的织构特性的纳米粒子,且具有酸碱两性和氧化还原性能.改性可提高催化体系的热稳定性和活性.其中CeO2-V2O5/TiO2-ZrO2催化剂具有恰当的氧化还原性和酸碱两性,二者协同作用,因而催化性能最佳.氧化还原稳定剂Sb的添加进一步提高了其催化性能.碱金属和碱土金属可优化其酸碱性,增加比表面积,从而提高反应活性和选择性以及CO2转化率.继续加强抑制积碳和促进CO2活化方面的研究,可有望进一步提高单程转化率(75%以上)、选择性(98%)和CO2转化率(30%).
总之,CO2氧化EB脱氢制SM是一个高度经济性和环境友好的新过程,在未来有望满足SM日益增长的需求.另外,该过程的开发可减少CO2排放,其副产的CO还可用于多种化工过程.然而,该过程仍面临诸多挑战:如何抑制积碳,单程转化率和催化剂寿命有待进一步提高.这些挑战也给我们未来的研究提供了方向.深入理解反应机理、积碳机理和CO2的活化过程也有利于我们开发出更适合工业应用的催化剂.
关键词氧化脱氢     CO2活化     ZrO2基复合氧化物     酸碱性     氧化还原性    

1. Introduction
1.1.Technologies for dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to styrene monomer

Styrene is one of the most important monomers inpolymer chemistry. Global styrene monomer (SM) consumption is driven by theproduction of its polymer or copolymer products, such as polystyrene (PS),polystyrene-butadiene rubber (SBR), polyacrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS).Styrene-based polymer materials offer unique characteristics, such as durability,high performance, versatility of design, simplicity of production and economy.They can also provide excellent hygiene, sanitation, and safety benefits. Owingto its usefulness, the demand of SM has been increasing every year. The SMcapacity in 2012 was estimated to be over 32.7 million tonnes (Merchant Researchand Consulting Group). To provide feedstock for products, the SM capacity usagerates are predicted to grow rapidly in the near future and are expected to reach~94% (Merchant Research & Consulting, 2015).

Catalytic dehydrogenation, one of the 10 mostimportant petrochemical processes, produces more than 90% of the SM requiredfor application [1]. The dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene (EB) is performed overa K-promoted iron oxide catalyst at around 600-650 °C, just below thedecomposition temperature of the reactant [2]. Owing to the high endothermic(125 kJ/mol) nature and volume increasing character of the reaction, in anadiabatic reactor, a large amount of superheated and pressurized steam(steam/EB = 7-15 mol/mol) is necessary to supply the heat and lower the partialpressure of reaction to shift the equilibrium towards the SM product [3]. Thelarge amount of steam acts as a diluent to lower the partial pressure of theproduct mixture, to shift the equilibrium to SM and to avoid (or remove) theformation of carbon deposits [4]. However, at the gas-liquid separator, a largeamount of latent heat steam is wasted [5]. Consequently, the estimated hike inproduction cost is about 10% and, in addition, the development of hotspotsabates the overall activity and catalyst lifetime. Several technologicaladvancements have emerged for the improvement of the existing commercialprocess by varying the other diluents apart from steam, such as co-feeding of O2and by introducing coupled reactions (SM Monomer Advanced Reheat Technology,SMART, by Lummus/UOP) [1]. Unlike conventional steam-reheat processes, theSMART process involves reactants that leave the dehydrogenation catalyst bedbeing reheated by selectively oxidizing part of the co-produced H2[6]. The reaction is fed by air or by oxygen-rich air and takes place over aproprietary UOP high selectivity catalyst with a selectivity of 92%-96%, andconversion in the range of 77%-93%. The exothermic oxidation reaction of H2with O2 provides the heat required for the subsequent EB dehydrogenation.The removal of H2 from the process shifts the reaction equilibriumin the dehydrogenation unit to substantially increase the single-pass EBconversions while maintaining high SM selectivity. Advantages of the Styro-Plusprocess include high conversion, high SM selectivity and reduced steamrequirements, thus making it an energy efficient process. Disadvantages of theprocess include the need for two catalysts in the reactor, and that the reactordesign and catalyst loading are more complicated for this system. Additionally,there is a danger of explosion owing to the side reaction of the completeoxidation reaction and the violent reaction of oxygen and the reactants.

To overcome such barriers of the oxidativedehydrogenation (ODH) of EB, a variety of oxidizing agents (such as air, CO2,N2O, SO2 and so forth) have also been widely investigatedover novel catalysts [7, 8, 9, 10].Recently, there have been reports on O2-promoted dehydrogenationwith metal-free carbon nanotubes. Su et al. [11] reported a very highly stableand selective catalyst for the synthesis of C4 olefins from n-butane,and the same group reported the hierarchical carbon materials which can beoperated at lower temperatures, below 350 °C, under O2. A few otherpromising catalytic systems have been developed with other soft oxidantconcepts. First, sulfur was reported as a soft oxidant for methane activationreported by Neurock and Marks with co-workers. The formation of metal sulfideslowered the activation energy which improved the selectivity of the products inmethane coupling. This sulfur system exhibited a decrease in surface cokeformation and high carbon balance [12]. Later, N2O and N2were also reported as soft oxidants in the ODH of EB to SM [13, 14]. Theseinnovative findings open new possibilities for building new systems anddeveloping catalysts suitable for these reactions, which may include a combinationof these components. After all the research on the ODH, a lot of questions havearisen regarding whether the present oxidative system, with CO2 assoft oxidant or in combination with other oxidants, is commercially credible.

As an emerging alternative technology, ODH of EBwith CO2 instead of steam has been under intensive investigation [11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. Although the dehydrogenation of EBprocess with CO2 has currently only been performed on a laboratoryscale, it is of interest, as this process can have a direct impact on both theeconomics and the environmental aspect during commercialization.

1.2.ODH of ethylbenzene with CO2

Dehydrogenation of light alkanes or alkane groupsof aromatics is a very important process in petroleum, polymer and industrialchemistry [11]. CO2 is used as a feedstock replacing the previouslyused partial oxygen-steam or oxygen-nitrogen streams. CO2 possessesa much weaker oxidizability as compared with the oxygen molecule but can stillbe used as a mild oxidant to remove the H2 by-product in thedehydrogenation unit and lower the reaction temperature without decreasing theconversion and selectivity.

There are two possible pathways for EBdehydrogenation with CO2. One is ODH of EB through the oxygenspecies dissociated from CO2 in a single step route and the other isdehydrogenation of EB coupled with a reverse water-gas shift reaction (RWGS) inthe two-step process [16, 17, 18, 19, 20].The result of the reaction is that the CO2 is not hydrogenated butconverted to CO and H2O molecules.

The estimated energies required in this CO2applied process is 190 kcal/kg of SM (EB/CO2 = 1/9). This is muchlower than the commercial steam process which is 1500 kcal/kg of SM (EB/H2O= 1/9). Consequently, the dehydrogenation in the presence of CO2should be an energy-saving process. As an estimation, a simple replacement ofwater steam with CO2 in an SM installation should decrease theenergy consumption from 6.4 to 0.8 GJ/t of SM [3]. Obviously, using CO2as a mild oxidant, ODH of EB to SM possesses both environmental and economicbenefits [11, 21].

CO2 use offers several advantages incatalysis, such as acceleration of the reaction rate, enhancement in productselectivity, alleviation of thermodynamic equilibrium limitations, suppressionof total oxidation, prolonging of catalyst lifetime and prevention of hot spotson the catalyst surface [3, 17, 22]. Based on these unique characteristics, CO2has been coined as a soft oxidant [16, 23]. Additionally, industrial use of CO2is increasingly important in many aspects especially the greenness of the processwhere CO2 is consumed during the process [14].

In view of these points, CO2 applied tothe EB dehydrogenation process could be considered as an industrially viable process.

1.3.Catalysts for ODH of ethylbenzene with CO2

Commercial Fe-based catalysts are not effectivefor the dehydrogenation of EB in the presence of CO2 owing to the decompositionof the active phase of the catalyst [2, 24]. Intensive studies have beenperformed to improve the commercial catalytic system of alkali metal-promotediron oxides, by supporting them onto Al2O3 and activatedcarbon materials [18, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29].These catalysts showed compatible catalytic activities effectively activatingCO2. Recently, various metal or metal oxide systems wereinvestigated further for exploitation of ODH of EB by means of CO2as soft oxidant [5, 10, 15, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34].In this direction, a variety of active metal components (Fe-, Cr-, V-,La-oxides and so forth.) have been investigated, supported on differentmaterials such as carbonaceous materials, MgO, SiO2 (mesoporoussilica), Al2O3, Ga2O3, ZrO2,TiO2 hydrotalcite-type compounds, zeolites and so forth [35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42]. The most recent studies have relatedto active carbon sites from carbonaceous deposits [43, 44] and synergeticeffects from redox active sites [45, 46].

Park and co-workers have studied several highperformance catalytic systems for CO2 applied effective ODH of EB,such as Fe-, V- and Cr-based catalysts [34]. These systems were based ondesigning a redox surface to activate CO2, dissociate it on thesurface of catalysts and use the oxygen for the RWGS reaction. Among thesecatalysts, Al2O3-supported vanadium and vanadium-antimonyoxide catalysts have been intensively studied and the results showed reasonableactivities [47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54]. The significanceof these catalyst systems for the title reaction has been consolidated.However, the deactivation owing to coke deposition and the deep reduction ofthe surface vanadium species still restrains the practical use of VOx/Al2O3-basedcatalysts.

2. Scope of this review

To design a better catalyst system in terms ofactivity, selectivity and stability for time-on-stream experiments, Park et al.[5, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60] developed several ZrO2-basedcomposite oxides; in particular, MnO2-ZrO2, TiO2-ZrO2,CeO2-ZrO2,SnO2-ZrO2, effect of Cl on Fe2O3/TiO2-ZrO2,effect of redox promoters (V2O5, CeO2, Sb2O3)and effect of alkali doping in TiO2-ZrO2. These catalystswith acid-base properties exhibited interesting and improved catalyticproperties for this reaction. Based on these catalytic achievements, thecontinuous work was supported by SABIC toward commercialization of thiseffective system. In this review, we will briefly summarize our recent basicstudies on ZrO2-based catalysts for CO2 applied ODH of EBand the further application to light paraffin for the production of olefins(Scheme 1).

Scheme 1. Development of zirconia‐based metal oxide catalysts.
3. Acid-basebifunctional ZrO2-based binary metal oxides

Based on the systemic research ofalumina-supported vanadia (VOx/Al2O3)catalysts with redox surface properties, we developed ZrO2-basedmetal oxide catalysts for ODH of EB with CO2, and proposed that theacid-base surface of zirconia metal oxides could activate EB and CO2simultaneously, to observe the positive effects of CO2 in directingthe EB conversion, product selectivity and prolonged catalytic activity.

In a primary study, Park et al. [61] found amphotericZrO2 was active for the dehydrogenation of EB, especially in thepresence of CO2. This positive effect of CO2 was highlydependent on the tetragonal phase of crystalline ZrO2. A higher EBconversion and SM selectivity were obtained with increased surface area and CO2affinity, which was related to surface basicity.

Additionally, mixing the pure oxides is beneficialto either modulate the properties of the component oxides or to create newactive sites. Several theories have been proposed for the enhanced acid-baseproperties and their activities [62, 63, 64, 65].

In the exploration of ZrO2-based mixedmetal oxide catalysts, our studies have focused on the various ZrO2-basedbinary metal oxide catalysts at the same time. These binary oxides are namelyTiO2-ZrO2, MnO2-ZrO2, CeO2-ZrO2and SnO2-ZrO2.

3.1.MnO2-ZrO2 binary metal oxides

In our recent report, we described the influenceof CO2 over ZrO2, wherein an enhancement in theconversion of EB and the selectivity towards SM in the presence of CO2oxidant were observed [61]. Furthermore, the catalytic activity of ZrO2was significantly improved when it was mixed with other transition metal oxides[66, 67, 68]. Our study on MnO2-ZrO2binary metal oxides was focused on enhancing the acid-base properties and alsothe introduction of the redox nature.

MnO2-ZrO2mixed oxides with various compositions (5-50 wt%)have been prepared by a co-precipitation method [55]. The precipitate waswashed thoroughly with water and dried at 120 °C for 12 h, then calcined at 550°C for 6 h. MnO2-ZrO2 mixed oxides are X-ray amorphous orpoorly crystalline, whereas both MnO2 and ZrO2 are purelycrystalline. The increase in surface area of the mixed oxide suggested the formationof solid solution. The surface areas of all the mixed oxides were more than 4times higher than those of the individual oxides. Additionally, the temperatureprogrammed desorption (TPD; NH3 and CO2) measurementsreveal that the 10% MnO2-ZrO2 mixed oxide possessed ahigher number of acidic as well as basic sites compared with the individualoxides.

As a result, MnO2-ZrO2binary metal oxides exhibited greatly elevated catalytic activity for theconversion of EB than those of the individual oxides in the presence of CO2(Fig. 1). The MnO2-ZrO2 binary metal oxide catalystexhibited conversion of 73% with a selectivity of 98% at 650 °C. However, in the absence of CO2,poor catalytic activity and stabilities were observed. A gradual enhancement ofactivity was demonstrated for the higher CO2 to EB ratios. Theincrease or optimization of the CO2/EB ratios showed an increase inconversion along with a preservation of the high selectivity. Hence, CO2had an active role as a soft oxidant by improving both activity and stabilityin the dehydrogenation of EB over MnO2-ZrO2 mixed oxidecatalysts.

Fig. 1. Effect of MnO2 content in MnO2-ZrO2 for the conversion of EB. (1) 5% MnO2-ZrO2; (2) 10% MnO2-ZrO2; (3) 20% MnO2-ZrO2; (4) 50% MnO2-ZrO2. Reaction conditions: Catalyst weight = 1.0 g, temperature = 600 °C, CO2/EB = 5.1 (molar ratio), W/F = 16.73 (gcat·h)/mol. Reproduced from Ref. [55]

The superior activity of MnO2-ZrO2mixed oxide over its respective individual oxides might arise from thegeneration of active sites during the stages of mixed oxide catalyst preparationas described above. The combination of redox and acid-base bi-functionalmechanism might be responsible for the higher activity of MnO2-ZrO2mixed oxides. However, further studies are necessary for the elucidation of themechanism.

3.2.TiO2-ZrO2 binary metal oxides

The combination of TiO2-ZrO2has attracted considerable attention as an active catalyst as well as support fora wide variety of reactions, as was summarized in a recent review by Reddy etal. [69]. The mixing of TiO2 and ZrO2 exhibits highsurface area, improved surface acid-base properties and enhanced hydrothermaland mechanical robustness. TiO2-ZrO2 mixed oxides areproven to be highly active and selective for dehydrogenation reactions.Particularly, TiO2-ZrO2 catalysts were used for theoxidative and non-oxidative dehydrogenation of EB and cyclohexane. We havestudied TiO2-ZrO2 binary metal oxides with variouscompositions, modified its catalytic properties with K and B, and finallycombined surface modification with textural property control in the sol-gelprocess by using the digestion method [56, 57, 58, 70].

3.2.1. Effect of composition on TiO2-ZrO2binary metal oxides

We have prepared TiO2-ZrO2binary metal oxide catalysts with different compositions by theco-precipitation method then calcined at 550 °C [56]. XRD patterns showed themixed metal oxides phase changed from monoclinic ZrO2 to tetragonal,amorphous and TiO2 anatase phase with incremental increase of TiO2content from 10% to 30%. Between the ratios 40%-60%, the catalysts showedamorphous nature and further increase of the Ti content only showed anatase TiO2phase. The amorphous phase was crystallized to clear TiZrO4 phasewhen the calcination temperature was raised to higher than 650 °C. Through theaddition of TiO2 to ZrO2, the surface area increasedsharply and reached to about 5-9 times that of its individual oxides. The NH3 and CO2-TPDprofiles demonstrated that the strength and number of acid-base sites ofTiO2-ZrO2 binary metal oxides were much higher than thatof its individual oxides (TiO2 and ZrO2).

In the dehydrogenation of EB with CO2,the 60% TiO2-ZrO2 amorphous catalyst exhibited superioractivity than that of other loadings (Fig. 2). The amorphous TiO2-ZrO2gave the compatible catalytic sites that are comparable to TiZrO4phase catalysts obtained at high temperature calcination [56]. The catalyactivity was almost double those of the individual oxides and stable even atelevated temperatures in the presence of CO2. The high selectivityarose from the suppressed cracking and hydrogenolysis reactions. Formation ofbenzene and toluene by-products was minimized.

Fig. 2. Effect of TiO2 content in TiO2-ZrO2 for the conversion of EB. Reaction conditions: Weight of the catalyst = 1 g, ethylbenzene flow rate = 1 ml/h, CO2/ethylbenzene = 5.1 (molar ratio), pressure = 1 atm, temperature = 600 °C. Reproduced from Refs. [56, 58].

The formation of amorphous TiZriO4phase, enhancement in the specific surface area, and increase in the number andstrength of acid-base sites are some of the reasons for the observed high catalytic activity andselectivity [68]. These results indicate that the dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene to SM followed the acid-base bi-functional mechanism, wherein Zr ionacts as Lewis acid site and Ti ion as a base site [64]. The coke deposition onthe surface of the catalyst was lower in the presence of CO2 thanthat of its absence and resulted in better catalytic activity and selectivity.

3.2.2. Boron oxide modified TiO2-ZrO2binary metal oxides

The dehydrogenation of EB to SM in the presence ofCO2 has been shown to proceed effectively on acid-base bi-functionalcatalysts with a balanced strength and number of acidic and basic sites. Various amounts of B2O3 (2.5-15 wt%)were supported on to amorphous TiO2-ZrO2 bifunctionalcatalysts with the wet-impregnation method [57]. The impregnated sampleswere dried, then calcined at 550 °Cto activate the surface. The specific surface area of the TiO2-ZrO2decreased with the impregnation of B2O3. The XRD patternsrevealed that the addition of B2O3 influenced thecrystallization and stabilization of the anatase TiO2. The additionof B2O3 increases the acidic strength and number ofacidic sites on TiO2-ZrO2 catalyst. The 5 wt% B2O3/TiO2-ZrO2catalyst did not exhibit good conversion or selectivity in comparison to TiO2-ZrO2catalysts. Benzene and toluene were the two major side products, which mainlyarise from the influence of the strong acid-base centers on the surface of thecatalysts [66]. Strong basic sites can abstract the β-H of the adsorbedEB which facilitates the cleavage of the C-C bond of the side chain resultingin the formation of toluene (Scheme 2), whereas the strong acid centersabstract the α-H of EB and facilitate the cleavage of the phenyl-C bondresulting in the production of benzene (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2. Cracking and hydrogenolysis of EB.

B2O3 could not promote theTiO2-ZrO2 catalysts for the CO2 applieddehydrogenation of EB. However, these results indicate an alternative directionfor promoting TiO2-ZrO2 with base moieties.

3.2.3. K2O promoted TiO2-ZrO2binary metal oxides

Based on the studies of TiO2-ZrO2binary metal oxide catalysts, we realized that these TiO2-ZrO2binary metal oxide catalysts could be further improved for the dehydrogenationof EB with CO2 by neutralizing the strong acidic sites. AmorphousTiO2-ZrO2 binary metal oxide with a specific composition(60:40 molar ratio) was impregnated with 1, 2, 3, and 4 wt% K2O[58]. After the impregnation, all these samples were dried at 120 °C for 12 h,and calcined at 600 °C for 6 h in air.

An increased amount of K2O loading willdiminish the BET surface areas of TiO2-ZrO2 binary metaloxide which might arise from the blockage of micropores. Through the additionof K2O, excess TiO2 in the amorphous TiO2-ZrO2binary metal oxide was crystallized into the anatase phase [71]. The motivationwas to use a basic alkali promoter for the activation of CO2. Forthe over 3% K2O/TiO2-ZrO2 catalyst, unifiedeffects of K2O and CO2 were observed. At a minimumloading (1 wt%) of K2O, the strong acidic sites were poisoned, whileincreasing K2O loading resulted in the neutralization of some weakto moderate acidic sites [3, 4]. In the presence of N2, theconversion of EB over the TiO2-ZrO2 catalyst was 52.19%.In the presence of CO2, the conversion of EB over a 3% K2O/TiO2-ZrO2catalyst was increased to 71.95%. The increase in the conversion is almost 20%and selectivity had almost reached 100% (99.63%). Deactivation of the K2O/TiO2-ZrO2catalyst was prolonged and the benzene formation was almost negligible. Suchhigh selectivity was usually observed at lower conversion levels of EB [72].The high SM selectivity of the K2O-promoted catalyst arose from thesuppression of the dealkylation reaction by neutralizing the strong acidicsites and converting hydrogen into water by the coupling of the RWGS reaction(Fig. 3) [58].

Fig. 3. Effect of K2O content in TiO2-ZrO2 for the conversion of EB. Reaction conditions: Weight of the catalyst = 1.0 g, ethylbenzene flow rate = 1 ml/h, CO2/EB = 5.1 (molar ratio), pressure = 1 atm, temperature = 550 °C. Reproduced from Ref. [58].

As mentioned earlier, an acid-base bi-functionalmechanism was proposed by several authors for the dehydrogenation of EB [5, 10].It is clear that there should be a balance of number and strength betweenacidic and basic sites either for simple dehydrogenation or ODH of EB with CO2.

3.2.4. TiO2-ZrO2 binary oxidesby digestion

AmorphousTiO2-ZrO2 binary metal oxides will provide more acid-baseactive sites by increasing their surface area. This will bring compatiblebenefits to the dehydrogenation of EB proposed by an acid-base bi-functionalmechanism. There is a well-known method to improvesurface area of metal oxides by amorphization with alkali metal doping (Scheme3) [70].

Scheme 3. Formation of solid solution over digestion. Reproduced from Ref. [70].

Using KOH solution as a hydrolyzing agent as wellas a digestion medium, a high surface area TiO2-ZrO2(50%) was prepared. Highly crystalline phases of ZrO2 are observedfor the undigested TiO2-ZrO2 catalyst (calcined at 600°C) [70]. After digestion with KOH solution, TiO2-ZrO2was transformed to amorphous TiZrO4 phase, which was confirmed fromthe Raman spectra [70]. After digestion, the particle size decreased from 25 to5 nm. Surprisingly, the specific surface area was increased to 166 m2/gwhich was higher than previously reported for the undoped catalyst. The phasetransformation from the crystalline to amorphous phase is the crystallization-amorphization-reorganizationprocess which is the Ostwald ripening process induced by K (or Na) in thedigestion media [73]. The alkali metal was doped into TiO2-ZrO2metal oxides during digestion which showed a broadness in the O1sspecies of the catalysts as evidenced in the references which consequentlyshowed the increase in activity and selectivity along with improved CO2conversion [70]. The digestion process helped in adjusting the acid-baseproperties of the catalysts.

The catalysts were applied to the dehydrogenationof methylethlbenzene. The highest conversion, selectivity and CO2consumption were observed simultaneously over properly digested TiO2-ZrO2catalyst.

TiO2-ZrO2catalysts were also prepared by NaOH digestion[74]. Compared with KOH digestion, a higher surface area of 188 m2/gwas achieved. The particle size of the TiO2-ZrO2 catalystwas even decreased to 3-5 nm, which is slightly smaller than that observed withKOH digestion. Acid-base sites were increased in both number and strength. Inthe dehydrogenation of EB with CO2, during 15 h time-on-stream, NaOHdigested catalyst showed high conversion (>60%), good selectivity (>95%)and apparent CO2 consumption (>10%) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4. Digested TiO2-ZrO2 for the dehydrogenation of EB. Reaction conditions: Weight of the catalyst = 1.0 g, ethylbenzene flow rate = 1 ml/h, CO2/EB = 5.1 (molar ratio), pressure = 1 atm, temperature = 600 °C. Reproduced from Ref. [73].

Digested TiO2-ZrO2 is highlydesirable toward dehydrogenation reactions, especially for CO2applied ODH of EB.

3.3.CeO2-ZrO2binary metal oxides

CeO2 is one of the most populartransition metal oxides in the application of heterogeneous catalysis as theactive component, additives or the support [75, 76]. CeO2 and ZrO2mixed oxides could generate definite benefits to the catalytic properties owingto the redox properties of CeO2, acid-base properties of ZrO2and the formation of new crystal phase [65, 77]. The CeO2 phase isable to store more active oxygen species in the catalyst system and is expectedto suppress the coke formation more effectively.

A catalyst comprised of 25 mol% CeO2and 75 mol% ZrO2 (25CZ),as a binary metal oxide, was prepared by the co-precipitation method [59].According to the XRD patterns of 25CZ, the solid solution formed withtetragonal symmetry, and no tetragonal or monoclinic forms of ZrO2were observed [64]. This arose from a facile solid phase reaction between CeO2and ZrO2. The surface area of 25CZ binary metal oxide (37 m2/g) isapproximately the same as the sum of the constituent individual oxides (25 and19 m2/g for ZrO2 and CeO2, respectively) [59].

25CZ catalyst exhibited better activity than CeO2and ZrO2. The enhancement of catalytic activity could be explainedwhere a kind of stress between the bonded atoms (Ce-O-Zr) was developed byvariation of the ionic sizes (effective ionic radii of Ce4+ = 0.97Å, Ce3+ = 1.14 Å, Zr4+ = 0.84 Å). The mixed metal oxidetends to form fine particles or amorphous mixtures, and will improve theacid-base property. The catalytic result was not comparable to MnO2-ZrO2and TiO2-ZrO2 systems. Further investigations on CeO2-ZrO2binary metal oxides are necessary.

3.4.SnO2-ZrO2 binary metal oxides

A series of SnO2-ZrO2nanocomposite catalysts were prepared over the full range from 0 to 100% of SnO2by careful hydrolysis of both metal salts with NH3 solution [60].The gel was precipitated and calcined at 600 °C. The sizes of the binary metaloxide particles were in the range of 10-15 nm with uniform sphericalmorphology. Pure monoclinic ZrO2 phase and cassiterite SnO2phase co-existed in the nanocomposite catalysts containing 10%-40% of SnO2.However, at 50%-90% SnO2 content, the nanocomposite catalystsexhibited only cassiterite SnO2 phase. No significant XRDreflections were related to ZrO2. There was a strong interactionbetween the two metal oxides. Owing to the strong interaction, the binary metaloxides showed greater surface acidity and moderate basicity compared with thoseof the single component oxides (Fig. 5). The highest catalytic activity wasobtained over 15% SnO2-ZrO2 (15% SnO2, 85% ZrO2).The beneficial role of CO2 as a diluent and as a soft oxidant wasapparent over the SnO2-ZrO2binary metal oxide catalyst.

Fig. 5. EB conversion over SnO2, ZrO2, SnO2-ZrO2. Reaction conditions: Catalyst weight 1.0 g, 600 °C, 1 atm, CO2/EB = 6 (molar ratio), W/F = 17.6 (gcat·h)/mol. Reproduced from Ref. [60].
3.5.Mesoporous silica-supported binary metal oxides

The properties of metal oxide nanoparticles weregreatly influenced by the number of atoms at the surface. However, at hightemperatures, the metal oxide nanoparticles were easily sintered and dramaticallylost their activities. One solution is to support the metal oxides on high surfacearea and thermally stable mesoporous materials, such as SBA-15 or mesoporoussilicalite-1 [59, 78, 79].

3.5.1. SBA-15-supported CeO2-ZrO2

Supported metal or metal oxides have been used andstudied in various reactions. Mesoporous silica, used as support, was chosen todisperse the mixed metal oxide system for overcoming the diffusion limitationto improve the activity. In the preparation of the CeO2-ZrO2/SBA-15catalyst, Ce(NO3)3 and ZrO(NO3)2were hydrolyzed with NH3 solution in the presence of calcinedSBA-15. Mixed metal hydroxide gels will form inside the mesopore or on theouter surface of SBA-15. The 25/25CZS catalyst (25 wt% of 25CZ on the SBA-15)was calcined at 650 °C for 12 h [59]. Undoubtedly, the supported 25/25CZScatalyst is X-ray amorphous revealing that CeO2-ZrO2binary metal oxides were highly dispersed on the SBA-15. In the dehydrogenationof EB with CO2, the 25/25 CZS catalyst showed superior activity thanthose of the individual oxides and binary metal oxides in terms of turn overfrequencies (TOF). Owing to the high dispersion of the binary metal oxides onthe SBA-15, the active sites were easily accessible to the reactants. The TOFof 25/25CZS catalyst was elevated 10-20 times when compared with its bulkoxides. The catalytic activity of this supported catalyst was stable during 10h of time-on-stream, while the activity of the unsupported metal oxides wasdecreased within 8 h of time-on-stream [59]. The improved lifetime of thesupported 25/25CZS catalyst was mainly owing to the suppressed sintering ofmetal oxide nanophases at high temperatures and facile transportation ofreactant or product in the mesoporous SBA-15. Further optimization of synthesisprocedures and more detailed characterization are required to improve thisnovel catalyst system.

3.5.2. Mesoporoussilicate-1-supported TiO2-ZrO2

Among our studies on ZrO2-based binarymetal oxide bulk catalysts, the results over TiO2-ZrO2are promising. They were supported onto the thermallystable mesoporous silicalite-1 [79]. The XRD pattern of TZ/CS-1 did not showany crystalline phase of TiO2 or ZrO2, only a typical reflectancefor the MFI-type zeolite from mesoporous silicalite-1 support. TiO2-ZrO2binary metal oxides were highly dispersed within the silicalite-1 crystals andshowed a high proportion of strong acid-base sites which might arise from theformation of solid solutions (ZrTiO4). In the dehydrogenation of EBto SM with CO2, this catalyst showed poor catalytic activity andselectivity to SM. However, the amount of coke deposition was less owing to thewell-developed porosity of the mesoporous silicalite-1 support.

4. Multimetal oxides for combination of acid-base with redox properties

The TiO2-ZrO2 compositeoxides are of great interest as active catalysts as well as supports in thedesign of heterogeneous catalysts for a wide range of reactions [69]. Thesignificant features of TiO2-ZrO2-basedmixed oxides include a high specific surface area, improved acid-base propertieswhen compared with those of the individual oxides, and improved redoxproperties, together with a high thermal stability and strong mechanicalstrength. Our fundamental studies revealed that TiO2-ZrO2binary metal oxides were dependable catalysts with excellent catalytic activityand selectivity for dehydrogenation of EB with CO2 as a soft oxidant[5]. However, there is still some concern regarding the fast deactivation ofTiO2-ZrO2 binary metal oxide catalysts by carbonaceousdeposits [80].

O

ne of the generally accepted hypotheses for ODHis that the reaction proceeds over redox active sites following a Mars-VanKrevelen mechanism and the rate-determining step is the breaking of the C-Hbond (Schemes 4 and 5) [81, 82]. Further, it is generally agreed that hydrocarbonoxidation over metal oxide catalysts involves the participation of lattice oxygen species or oxygen vacancies.

Scheme 4. Proposed dehydrogenation mechanism over TiO2-ZrO2.

Scheme 5. Reduction and re-oxidation step in the Mars-van Krevelen mechanism.

Therefore, in the subsequent investigations, redoxmetal oxide-promoted MOx/TiO2-ZrO2catalysts, where MOx is Fe2O3, V2O5, CeO2,V2O5-CeO2 and V2O5-Sb2O5-CeO2,were synthesized and evaluated for the ODH of EB using CO2 as thesoft oxidant [80, 83, 84, 85].

4.1. Fe2O3/TiO2-ZrO2catalyst: influence of Cl

The Fe2O3/TiO2-ZrO2catalyst was explored and the influence of chloride ions in TiO2-ZrO2binary metal oxide was discussed (Fig. 6). Calcined TiO2-ZrO2,which was synthesized by a co-precipitation method, was wet impregnated with 15wt% Fe2O3. After calcination, the chlorine-containing TiO2-ZrO2showed less surface area and revealed a slightly crystalline phase of ZrTiO4.The iron oxides were highly dispersed over the chlorine-containing TiO2-ZrO2support as evidenced by the XRD pattern. Fe2O3impregnation did not change the pore structure, crystal phase or particlemorphology of chlorine-containing TiO2-ZrO2. In thedehydrogenation of EB with CO2, the order of activity on variouscatalysts was found to be Fe2O3/TiO2-ZrO2(Cl) > TiO2-ZrO2 (Cl) > TiO2-ZrO2.Cl ions exhibit a strong influence on the physicochemical and catalytic propertiesof the TiO2-ZrO2 and revealed a good catalytic efficiencyof the Fe2O3/TiO2-ZrO2 combination.From the results of high and stable activity without rapid deactivation, theiron chloride species are expected to play a role as redox active sites andthis can be coupled with the acid-base Fe2O3/TiO2-ZrO2[83].

Fig. 6. Effect of chlorine and Fe2O3 in TiO2-ZrO2 for the conversion of EB. Reaction conditions: Catalyst weight = 1.0 g, temperature = 600 °C, pressure = 1 atm, CO2 = 20 ml/min, EB = 9.8 mmol/h. Reproduced from Ref. [83]
4.2.V2O5-CeO2/TiO2-ZrO2combination catalysts

The ceria component in the mixed metal oxides isable to promote the oxidizability of catalysts and can suppress catalystdeactivation by preventing coke formation in the ODH reactions [80]. In thehigh temperature gas phase dehydrogenation reaction, bulk cerium and vanadiumoxides undergo sintering easily and deactivate rapidly. The combination ofvanadia (known for its redox properties) and ceria (known for its oxygenstorage and release functions) is expected to provide better catalytic systems.

On the acid-base TiO2-ZrO2binary metal oxides, vanadium oxide and cerium oxide were supportedindividually or together for the ODH of EB to SM using CO2 as a softoxidant. Here, by control of the sol-gel process, a high specific surface area(207 m2/g) TiO2-ZrO2 was synthesized by aco-precipitation method. The TiO2-ZrO2 was calcined at550 °C. Based on the surfacearea of TiO2-ZrO2, a monolayer equivalent of V2O5(15 wt%), CeO2 (15 wt%) and CeO2-V2O5(7.5 wt% + 7.5 wt%) were deposited by adopting a standard wet impregnation method,then calcined again at 550 °C. These mixed metal oxides showed an X-rayamorphous phase, but contained an amorphous TiZrO4 phase and smalleramounts of ZrV2O7 and CeVO4 phase. In the CeO2-V2O5/TiO2-ZrO2catalyst, the co-addition of ceria with vanadium oxide onto the TiO2-ZrO2support gave rise to a strong solid-state reaction, which influenced theparticle size of the TiO2-ZrO2, and promoted the vanadiumoxide dispersion and the reducibility.

The CeO2-V2O5/TiO2-ZrO2catalyst showed superior activity with higher selectivity than those of theindividual metal oxide-supported catalysts (Fig. 7). In this combinationcatalyst system, 56% conversion and 98% product selectivity were achievedduring 10 h time-on-stream. Addition of CeO2 to V2O5/TiO2-ZrO2prevented catalyst deactivation and helped to maintain a high and stablecatalytic activity.

Fig. 7. Catalytic activity of CeO2-V2O5/TiO2-ZrO2 for the conversion of EB. Reaction conditions: Catalyst weight 1.0 g, 600 °C, 1 atm, W/F = 16.73 (gcat·h)/mol, CO2/EB = 5.1 (molar ratio). Reproduced from Ref. [80].
4.3. V2O5-Sb2O5-CeO2/TiO2-ZrO2catalysts

The redox behavior of V2O5as a catalyst is known in ODH. Sb2O5 is able to stabilizehighly dispersed V2O5 species on the catalyst support. Antimonyoxides and highly dispersed vanadium oxides could react in the solid phase andprovide a new mixed oxide phase, which is likely to induce a facile redoxtransformation between vanadium redox pairs, and result in improved catalystactivity and stability [16]. Similar results were also observed in the catalystof V stabilized with CeO2-ZrO2 solid solution (Fig. 8)[43].

Fig. 8. Activity comparison of the present VSC/TZ catalyst with previous results. Reaction conditions: 600 °C, CO2/EB molar ratio = 5.1. Reproduced from Ref. [85].

Based on the positive role of Sb and Ce to thesupported vanadium oxides, we designed a V2O5-Sb2O5-CeO2/TiO2-ZrO2catalyst, under the concept of combining the acid-base bi-functional naturewith the redox properties [85]. In the mixed metal oxides, the highly dispersedvanadium species induced the formation of a well-crystalline ZrTiO4compound and some ZrV2O7 phase [84]. The existence ofhighly active VSbO4 species was also observed.

The addition of antimony oxide to the former V2O5-CeO2/TiO2-ZrO2 catalyst will give a selectivity of SM higherthan 96% at the conversion levels of EB at about 50%-65%. This result is betterthan the data previously reported by our group.

Acid-base and redox properties, includingsustained stability of active species (V5+), are responsible for thehigh activity of the V2O5-Sb2O5-CeO2/TiO2-ZrO2catalyst. The redox cycle is related to the dispersed V5+ andlattice reduced vanadium site in the VSbO4 phase [85]. The antimonyoxide inhibits the easy redox cycle between different vanadia species.

4.4.ODH of p-diethylbenzene and n-butane

The concept of acid-base bi-functionality andredox nature has been extended to other alkyl aromatics and lower alkanes,especially, TiO2-ZrO2-based catalysts have been appliedto other reactions, such as CeO2 promoted TiO2-ZrO2nano-oxide catalysts for the ODH of p-diethylbenzene and a novel VOx/SnO2-ZrO2 catalyst for C4 olefins from n-butane.Both catalytic systems developed provide further proof that acid-basebi-functional/redox catalysts can undoubtedly be used for C-H activation [15, 86, 87].

4.4.1. CeO2 promoted TiO2-ZrO2catalysts for ODH of p-diethylbenzene

CeO2 promoted TiO2-ZrO2(CTZ-MW) mixed oxides were synthesized by the microwave hydrothermal method andcompared with the conventional hydrothermal method (CTZ-HT) in thedehydrogenation of p-diethylbenzene with CO2 [86].Interestingly, microwave prepared CTZ-MW showed an improved specific surfacearea compared to CTZ-HT, which is not common in the case of the TiO2-ZrO2binary metal oxide system. CeO2 is highly dispersed onto TiO2-ZrO2.Over the CTZ-MW catalyst, the conversion and selectivity of p-diethylbenzenewere 74% and 98%, respectively. The time-on-stream was stable up to 8 h. Theunique activity of CTZ-MW was achieved through CeO2 promotion and improvedtextural properties with MW synthesis (Fig. 9).

HT: hydrothermal; MW: microwave; TZ: TiO2–ZrO2 (1:1 mole ratio); CTZ: 2 wt% CeO2/TiO2–ZrO2; DEB: p-diethylbenzene Fig. 9. Activity comparison over TZ and CTZ catalyst for DEB conversion. Reaction conditions: 600 °C, 1 atm, LHSV = 0.5 ml/h, CO2/DEB = 20 (molar ratio). Reproduced from Ref. [86].
4.4.2.VOx/SnO2-ZrO2 catalyst for ODH of n-butane

Vanadium oxide was supported onto the ZrO2,SnO2 and SnO2-ZrO2 mixed oxide for the ODH of n-butaneemploying CO2 as the soft oxidant [87]. The composition of catalystwas investigated and the 7.5 wt% V2O5/SnO2-ZrO2(SnO2 is 15% in the SnO2-ZrO2) catalystexhibited the best catalytic activity. This optimized catalyst has a highspecific surface area and a higher number of medium strength acid-base sitesthan the others. Additionally, supported-vanadia species were reduced at arelatively lower temperature. The CO2 as a diluent or oxidant alsoexhibited a significant promotion effect on the selective conversion of n-butaneto C4 olefins over 7.5 wt% V2O5/SnO2-ZrO2catalyst with 22.34% conversion of n-butane and 36.63% selectivity to C4olefins.

5. Summary

ODH of EB to SM is of great potential andeconomical interest as a means of producing high yields of SM. EB dehydrogenationwith CO2 as a soft oxidant was studied intensively over ZrO2-basedbinary metal oxide catalysts. The catalytic activity of the mixed oxides isgreater in the presence of CO2 compared with its absence. Thesemixed metal oxides are essentially nanoparticles with improved texturalproperties and the newly developed acid-base bi-functionality.

The development of a catalyst system that showspromising catalytic activity for EB with selectivity towards SM and CO2conversion has been studied. CO2 played a vital role in the activityand improving stability of the catalyst. The role of CO2 can bedefined as a soft oxidant, which is oxidizing the surface of the catalyst andmaintaining the surface oxygen content, removing the coke on the surface of thecatalyst by reverse Boudouard reaction, removing the hydrogen product by RWGSreaction and providing high heat capacity to the reaction system, which helpsin overcoming the equilibrium limitation and achieve high conversions [45, 54, 73, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92].

All the catalysts studied above are illustrationsof ZrO2-based catalytic systems with improved and modified acid-baseproperties along with redox properties. These modifications lead to animprovement of the development of catalysts with high thermal stability,improved activities and CO2 activation. The best result was observedfrom the CeO2−V2O5/ TiO2−ZrO2catalyst, which combines the stabilized redox property with acid-basebi-function. This multi metal oxide system is improved further by the additionof Sb as a redox stabilizer. Doping of alkali and alkaline earth metals hasenhanced the conversions and selectivities along with CO2 conversionbased by optimizing the acid-base properties and increased surface areas. Insummary, based on the present status of the catalyst and the process, there isa lot of scope for further studies to meet requirements such as high per passconversion above 75% and selectivity greater than 98% with CO2conversion around 30%. From the above discussion, the strategies that should befocused on are:

(1) Stabilization and improvement of the presentcatalyst system for a greater than 24 h single run;

(2) Reducing coke formation;

(3) Regeneration of catalyst;

(4) Improving CO2 activation andconversion.

These developed catalysts provide a foundation forscaling up the reaction systems to the commercial scale. Using CO2as feedstock has been a farfetched dream which can be run by using the out gasfrom petrochemical oxidation or the reforming industry. The high selectivity ofSM in this selective dehydrogenation process suggests a $2.7 million saving for0.6 Mt of SM monomer per year could be made, which arises from the input andthe output energies in the case of the industrial steam process, and is muchhigher than that of the CO2- mediated process.

6. Conclusions

The catalyst systems for the ODH have been testedonly to the lab scale and are mainly based on acid-base catalysts and redoxcatalysts. We conclude that the oxidative dehydrogenation of EB with CO2is an economic and environmentally-benign process which may serve theincreasing SM demand in the near future. Although using the CO2process has the advantage of being an energy saving process, there are stillchallenges that need to be overcome, such as coke formation, longevity of thecatalyst and high per pass conversion. These challenges provide a lot of scopefor research in this area for the development of catalysts. Another importantaspect of the ODH with CO2 is the production of CO byproducts, whichis a very valuable chemical able to be used in many processes. A clear understandingof the mechanisms of the reaction, coke formation and CO2 activationwill enable us to obtain a potential catalyst that can be industrially viable.We can envisage that using CO2 in this process may reduce theoverall CO2 production in the production of SM.

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by Saudi Arabia BasicIndustries Corporation (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia), the BK21 Plus Project in 2014and Nano-Technology Fusion Center (Inha University, Chemistry & ChemicalEngineering, Lab of Nano-Green Chemistry).

References
[1] F. Cavani, F. Trifiro, Appl. Catal. A, 1995, 133, 219.
[2] J. Matsui, T. Sodesawa, F. Nozaki. Appl. Catal., 1991, 67, 179.
[3] N. Mimura, I. Takahara, M. Saito, T. Hattori, K. Ohkuma, M. Ando. Catal. Today, 1998, 45, 61.
[4] M. M. Bhasin, J. H. McCain, B. V. Vora, T. Imai, P. R. Pujado. Appl. Catal. A, 2001, 221, 397.
[5] B. M. Reddy, D. S. Han, N. Jiang, S. E. Park. Catal. Surv. Asia, 2008, 12, 56.
[6] T. Imai, US Patent 4 435 607, 1984.
[7] N. R. Shiju, M. Anilkumar, S. P. Mirajkar, C. S. Gopinath, B. S. Rao, C. V. Satyanarayana. J. Catal., 2005, 230, 484.
[8] B. M. Reddy, P. Lakshmanan, S. Loridant, Y. Yamada, T. Kobayashi, C. Lopez-Cartes, T. C. Rojas, A. Fernandez. J. Phys. Chem.B, 2006, 110, 9140.
[9] B. A. Banares. Catal. Today, 1999, 51, 319.
[10] S. E. Park, S. C. Han. J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2004, 7, 1257.
[11] S. Wang, Z. H. Zhu. Energy Fuels, 2004, 18, 1126.
[12] J. J. H. B. Sattler, J. Ruiz-Martinez, E. Santillan-Jimenez, B. M. Weckhuysen. Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 10613.
[13] L. Li, N. Zhao, W. Wei, Y. H. Sun. Fuel, 2013, 108, 112.
[14] M. B. Ansari, S. E. Park. Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 419.
[15] G. Raju, B. M. Reddy, S. E. Park. Indian J. Chem. A, 2012, 51A, 1315.
[16] J. S. Chang, V. P. Vislovskiy, M. S. Park, D. Y. Hong, J. S. Yoo, S. E. Park. Green Chem., 2003, 5, 587.
[17] M. Sugino, H. Shimada, T. Turuda, H. Miura, N. Ikenaga, T. Suzuki. Appl. Catal. A, 1995, 121, 125.
[18] R. Dziembaj, P. Kustrowski, T. Badstube, H. Papp. Top. Catal., 2003, 11-12, 317.
[19] Z. F. Qin, J. G. Liu, A. L. Sun, J. G. Wang. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2003, 42, 1329.
[20] A. L. Sun, Z. F. Qin, S. W. Chen, J. G. Wang. J. Mol. Catal.A, 2004, 210, 189.
[21] C. S. Song. Catal. Today, 2006, 115, 2.
[22] S. Sato, M. Ohhara, T. Sodesawa, F. Nozaki. Appl. Catal., 1988, 37, 207.
[23] T. Sanji, H. Hanao, H. Sakurai. Chem. Lett., 1997, 1121.
[24] F. T. Zangeneh, S. Sahebdelfar, M. T. Ravanchi. J. Nat. Gas. Chem., 2011, 20, 219.
[25] N. Mimura, M. Saito. Catal. Lett., 1999, 58, 59.
[26] N. Mimura, M. Saito. Catal. Today, 2000, 55, 173.
[27] M. Saito, H. Kimura, N. Mimura, J. Wu, K. Murata. Appl. Catal. A, 2003, 239, 71.
[28] T. Badstube, H. Papp, P. Kustrowski, R. Dziembaj. Catal. Lett., 1998, 55, 169.
[29] T. Badstube, H. Papp, R. Dziembaj, P. Kustrowski. Appl. Catal. A, 2000, 204, 153.
[30] Y. Sakurai, T. Suzaki, K. Nakagawa, N. Ikenaga, H. Aota, T. Suzuki. J. Catal., 2002, 209, 16.
[31] R. Dziembaj, P. Kustrowski, L. Chmielarz. Appl. Catal. A, 2003, 255, 35.
[32] G. Carja, R. Nakamura, T. Aida, H. Niiyama. J. Catal., 2003, 218, 104.
[33] S. W. Chen, Z. F. Qin, A. L. Sun, J. G. Wang. J. Nat. Gas. Chem., 2006, 15, 11.
[34] J. S. Chang, D. Y. Hong, V. P. Vislovskiy, S. E. Park. Catal. Surv. Asia, 2007, 11, 59.
[35] X. H. Li, W. Y. Li, K. C. Xie. Catal. Lett., 2005, 105, 223.
[36] Y. Ohishi, T. Kawabata, T. Shishido, K. Takaki, Q. Zhang, Y. Wang, K. Takehira. J. Mol. Catal. A, 2005, 230, 49.
[37] S. W. Chen, Z. F. Qin, X. F. Xu, J. G. Wang. Appl. Catal. A, 2006, 302, 185.
[38] B. S. Liu, G. Rui, R. Z. Chang, C. T. Au. Appl. Catal.A, 2008, 335, 88.
[39] Y. Y. Qiao, C. X. Miao, Y. H. Yue, Z. K. Xie, W. M. Yang, W. M. Hua, Z. Gao. Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2009, 119, 150.
[40] C. G. Li, C. X. Miao, Y. Y. Nie, Y. H. Yue, S. Y. Gu, W. M. Yang, W. M. Hua, Z. Gao. Chin. J. Catal., 2010, 31, 993.
[41] A. H. de Morais Batista, F. F. de Sousa, S. B. Honorato, A. P. Ayala, J. M. Filho, F. W. de Sousa, A. N. Pinheiro, J. C. S. de Araujo, R. F. Nascimento, A. Valentini, A. C. Oliveria. J. Mol. Catal. A, 2010, 315, 86.
[42] R. Rao, Q. Zhang, H. Liu, H. Yang, Q. Ling, M. Yang, A. Zhang, W. Chen. J. Mol. Catal. A, 2012, 363-364, 283.
[43] Z. W. Liu, C. Wang, W. B. Fan, Z. T. Liu, Q. Q. Hao, X. Long, J. Lu, J. G. Wang, Z. F. Qin, D. Su. ChemSusChem, 2011, 4, 341.
[44] C. Nederlof, Freek Kapteijn, M. Makkee. Appl. Catal. A, 2012, 417-418, 163.
[45] O. Irun, S. A. Sadosche, J. Lasobras, J. Soler, E. Frances, J. Herguido, Menendez M. Catal.Today, 2013, 203, 53.
[46] M. Ji, X. Zhang, J. Wang, S. E. Park. J. Mol. Catal. A, 2013, 371, 36.
[47] M. S. Park, J. S. Chang, D. S. Kim, S. E. Park. Res. Chem. Intermed., 2002, 28, 461.
[48] V. P. Vislovskiy, J. S. Chang, M. S. Park, S. E. Park. Catal. Commun., 2002, 3, 227.
[49] M. S. Park, V. P. Vislovskiy, J. S. Chang, Y. G. Shul, J. S. Yoo, S. E. Park. Catal.Today, 2003, 87, 205.
[50] D. Y. Hong, V. P. Vislovskiy, S. E. Park, M. S. Park, J. S. Yoo, J. S. Chang. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 2005, 26, 1743.
[51] D. Y. Hong, J. S. Chang, J. H. Lee, V. P. Vislovskiy, S. H. Jhung, S. E. Park, Y. H. Park. Catal. Today, 2006, 112, 86.
[52] D. Y. Hong, J. S. Chang, V. P. Vislovskiy, S. E. Park, Y. H. Park, J. S. Yoo. Chem. Lett., 2006, 35, 28.
[53] J. W. Yoon, S. H. Jhung, J. S. Chang. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 2007, 28, 2405.
[54] D. Y. Hong, V. P. Vislovskiy, Y. K. Hwang, S. H. Jhung, J. S. Chang. Catal. Today, 2008, 131, 140.
[55] D. R. Burri, K. M. Choi, D. S. Han, J. B. Koo, S. E. Park. Catal. Today, 2006, 115, 242.
[56] D. R. Burri, K. M. Choi, S. C. Han, A. Burri, S. E. Park. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 2007, 28, 53.
[57] D. R. Burri, K. M. Choi, S. E. Park. Solid State Phenom., 2007, 124-126, 1737.
[58] D. R. Burri, K. M. Choi, S. C. Han, A. Burri, S. E. Park. J. Mol. Catal. A, 2007, 269, 58.
[59] D. R. Burri, K. M. Choi, J. H. Lee, D. S. Han, J. B. Koo, S. E. Park. Catal. Commun., 2007, 8, 43.
[60] D. R. Burri, K. M. Choi, D. S. Han, Sujandi, N. Jiang, A. Burri, S. E. Park. Catal.Today, 2008, 131, 173.
[61] J. N. Park, J. Noh, J. S. Chang, S. E. Park. Catal. Lett., 2000, 65, 75.
[62] M. Yashima, H. Arashi, M. Kakihana, M. Yoshimura. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1994, 77, 1067.
[63] B. M. Reddy, I. Ganesh, B. Chowdhury. Catal. Today, 1999, 49, 115.
[64] B. M. Reddy, A. Khan. Catal. Surv. Asia, 2005, 9, 155.
[65] B. M. Reddy, A. Khan, P. Lakshmanan, M. Aouine, S. Loridant, J. C.Volta. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 3355.
[66] I. Wang, W. F. Chang, R. J. Shiau, J. C. Wu, C. S. Chung. J. Catal., 1983, 83, 428.
[67] J. Fung, I. Wang. Appl. Catal. A, 1998, 166, 327.
[68] M. E. Manriquez, T. Lopez, R. Gomez, J. Navarrete. J. Mol. Catal. A, 2004, 220, 229.
[69] B. M. Reddy, A. Khan. Catal. Rev., 2005, 47, 257.
[70] A. Burri, N. Jiang, S. E. Park. Catal. Sci. Technol., 2012, 2, 514.
[71] K. I. Hadjiivanov, D. G. Klissurski. Chem. Soc .Rev., 1996, 25, 61.
[72] A. L. Sun, Z. F. Qin, S. W. Chen, J. G. Wang. Catal. Today, 2004, 273, 93.
[73] A. Burri, N. Jiang, K. Yahyaoui, S. E.Park. Appl. Catal. A, 2015, 495, 192.
[74] W. D. Mross. Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 1983, 25, 591.
[75] A. Trovarelli. Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 1996, 38, 439.
[76] W. Huang, Y. X. Gao. Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 3772.
[77] R. Di Monte, J. Kaspar. J. Mater. Chem., 2005, 15, 633.
[78] H. F. Yang, Q. Y. Lu, F. Gao, Q. H. Shi, Y. Yan, F. Q. Zhang, S. H. Xie, B. Tu, D. Y. Zhao. Adv. Func. Mater., 2005, 15, 1377.
[79] N. Jiang, D. S. Han, S. E. Park. Catal. Today, 2009, 141, 344.
[80] B. M. Reddy, S. C. Lee, D. S. Han, S. E. Park. Appl. Catal. B, 2009, 87, 230.
[81] K. D. Chen, A. Khodakov, J. Yang, A. T. Bell, E. Iglesia. J. Catal., 1999, 186, 325.
[82] H. H. Kung. Adv. Catal., 1994, 40, 1.
[83] B. M. Reddy, H. Jin, D. S. Han, S. E. Park. Catal. Lett., 2008, 124, 357.
[84] K. N. Rao, B. M. Reddy, B. Abhishek, Y. H. Seo, N. Jiang, S. E. Park. Appl. Catal. B, 2009, 91, 649.
[85] B. Abhishek, N. Jiang, M. Ji, S. E. Park, Y. Khalid. Top. Catal., 2013, 56, 1724.
[86] K. N. Rao, B. M. Reddy, S. E. Park. Appl. Catal. B, 2010, 100, 472.
[87] G. Raju, B. M. Reddy, A. Burri, Y. H. Mo, S. E. Park. Appl. Catal. A, 2012, 423-424, 168.
[88] J. Zhang, X. Liu, R. Blume, A. Zhang, R. Schlögl, D. S. Su. Science, 2008, 322, 73.
[89] Q. Zhu, S. L. Wegener, C. Xie, O. Uche, M. Neurock, T. J. Marks. Nat. Chem., 2013, 5, 105.
[90] S. W. Chen, X. F. Jia, X. Y. Cui, R. F. Li. Adv. Mater. Res., 2011, 932, 361.
[91] J. Madhavi, M. Suresh, G. V. Ramesh Babu, P. S. Sai Prasad, B. David Raju, K. S. Rama Rao. J. CO2 Util., 2014, 8, 21.
[92] K. Saito, K. Okuda, N. Ikenaga, T. Miyake, T. Suzuki. J. Phys. Chem. A, 2010, 114, 3845.