催化学报  2017, Vol. 38 Issue (4): 673-682   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Chi Chen
Zhiyou Zhou
Yucheng Wang
Xue Zhang
Xiaodong Yang
Xinsheng Zhang
Shigang Sun
Fe, N, S-doped porous carbon as oxygen reduction reaction catalyst in acidic medium with high activity and durability synthesized using CaCl2 as template
Chi Chena,b, Zhiyou Zhoub, Yucheng Wangb, Xue Zhangb, Xiaodong Yangb, Xinsheng Zhanga, Shigang Suna,b     
a. State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China;
b. State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, China
* Corresponding author. Xinsheng Zhang, Tel: +86-21-64253469; E-mail: xszhang@ecust.edu.cn; Shigang Sun, Tel: +86-592-2180181; E-mail: sgsun@xmu.edu.cn
Foundation item: This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2015CB932303) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21373175, 21621091)
Abstract: Proton exchange membrane fuel cells suffer from the sluggish kinetics of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and the high cost of Pt catalysts. In the present work, a high-performance ORR catalyst based on Fe, N, S-doped porous carbon (FeNS-PC) was synthesized using melamine formaldehyde resin as C and N precursors, Fe(SCN)3 as Fe and S precursors, and CaCl2 as a template via a two-step heat treatment without a harsh template removal step. The results show that the catalyst treated at 900℃ (FeNS-PC-900) had a high surface area of 775 m2/g, a high mass activity of 10.2 A/g in an acidic medium, and excellent durability; the half-wave potential decreased by only 20 mV after 10000 potential cycles. The FeNS-PC-900 catalyst was used as the cathode in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell and delivered a peak power density of 0.49 W/cm2. FeNS-PC-900 therefore has good potential for use in practical applications.
© 2017, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Non-precious metal catalyst     Oxygen reduction reaction     Proton exchange membrane fuel cell     Fe, N, S-doped porous carbon     Melamine formaldehyde resin    
以CaCl2为模板合成的高活性和高稳定性铁、氮、硫共掺杂多孔碳氧还原电催化剂
陈驰a,b, 周志有b, 王宇成b, 张雪b, 杨晓冬b, 张新胜a, 孙世刚a,b     
a. 华东理工大学化工学院, 化学工程联合国家重点实验室, 上海 200237;
b. 厦门大学化学化工学院, 能源材料化学协同创新中心, 固体表面物理化学国家重点实验室, 福建厦门 361005
摘要:燃料电池是一种可将化学能通过电催化反应直接转化成电能的装置,具有能量密度高和清洁无污染等优点.燃料电池阴极氧还原反应(ORR)的动力学较迟缓,是电池能量效率损失的主要原因.目前ORR催化活性最高的是铂基催化剂,但由于贵金属铂价格昂贵,储量稀少,且对燃料小分子渗透的抗性较差,严重制约了燃料电池的大规模应用.因此,高性能、低成本的非贵金属催化剂成为燃料电池领域的研究热点. 本文选用含氮量高达45%的三聚氰胺-甲醛树脂为碳源和氮源,Fe(SCN)3为铁源和硫源,以CaCl2为模板,在高温和铁的催化作用下将树脂碳化,经酸洗和二次热处理工艺,制备出铁、氮、硫共掺杂的多孔碳(FeNS-PC).干燥后的CaCl2颗粒可防止树脂在高温下交联形成块状碳颗粒,同时起到造孔模板的作用.CaCl2颗粒在温和条件下即可除去,无需强腐蚀性条件,因此不会对催化活性中心造成破坏.在Fe/N/C催化剂中掺杂S可进一步提高催化活性,不添加碳载体可避免低活性的碳载体降低质量活性,多孔结构可促进传质,充分利用活性位点. 我们优化了热处理温度,并对催化剂的结构、组分及催化性能等进行了表征分析.结果表明,热处理温度为900℃时,可将树脂完全转化成多孔碳,并获得较高的杂原子掺杂量,可达到最优活性.CaCl2为模板剂可避免使用强腐蚀性试剂去除模板,有利于保留活性位,并得到多孔结构.FeNS-PC-900的比表面积可达775 m2/g.得益于原位掺杂的合成工艺,各掺杂元素在多孔碳表面均匀分布.在酸性介质中,FeNS-PC-900的半波电位可达到0.811 V,仅比商业Pt/C催化剂低78 mV;在0.8 V电位下的质量活性为10.2 A/g,表现出优异的催化活性.经过10000圈加速衰减测试后,其半波电位仅下降了20 mV,在0.75 V电位下持续放电10000 s后,其ORR电流仍保持初始电流的84.4%,具有比Pt/C更加优异的稳定性.以FeNS-PC-900为阴极催化剂的质子交换膜燃料电池的最大功率密度可达到0.49 W/cm2,并在0.6 V电压下持续放电10 h后,其电流仍可保持初始电流的65%,表现出良好的应用潜力.FeNS-PC-900具有高掺杂含量、高比表面积和多孔结构,并且杂原子在催化剂表面均匀分散,在半电池和燃料电池测试中都表现出优异的催化活性和稳定性,表明其是一种非常有潜力应用于燃料电池的非贵金属氧还原催化剂.
关键词非贵金属催化剂    氧还原反应    质子交换膜燃料电池    铁、氮、硫共掺杂多孔碳    三聚氰胺-甲醛树脂    

1 Introduction

Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are sustainable and highly efficient energy-conversion devices that convert chemical energy directly to electricity [1]. The sluggish kinetics of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) on the cathode of a PEMFC significantly reduces the PEMFC performance, and highly active ORR electrocatalysts such as Pt and its alloys are usually needed [2, 3]. However, the high price and scarcity of Pt are an obstacle to large-scale applications of PEMFCs [4]. The development of high-performance and low-cost non- precious-metal catalysts, especially Fe/N/C-based materials, as alternatives has therefore attracted extensive interest [5].

Fe/N/C-based materials are usually prepared by pyrolyzing a mixture of Fe, N, and C precursors. These materials have good catalytic activities and excellent tolerances toward fuel crossover [6-8]. Although the ORR activities of Fe/N/C catalysts in alkaline media are comparable to those of state-of-the-art Pt/C catalysts, their ORR activities in acidic media are much lower, and far from satisfactory [9-11]. Previous studies have shown that additional doping of Fe/N/C catalysts with S significantly improves the ORR activity in acidic media [12]. More importantly, a high ORR activity depends on the single-site turnover and the active site density. The carbon supports in precursors are generally unable to catalyze the ORR, and probably reduce the active site density in the final product [13]. Direct carbonization of precursors leads to collapse of the carbon skeleton and formation of dense carbon materials. Colloidal or mesoporous silica is frequently used as a hard template to increase the catalyst surface area and porosity to provide internal active sites and a porous nanostructure to facilitate mass transport [14, 15]. Feng and coworkers [16] used silica nanoparticles, ordered mesoporous silica SBA-15, and montmorillonite as templates to prepare various mesoporous structures. Their studies showed that the well-defined porous structure and high Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area generated by silica nanoparticles greatly improved the ORR performance. However, the removal of a silica template is normally tedious and requires the use of extremely corrosive and toxic reagents such as HF. In addition, the corrosive etching procedure can damage the newly formed ORR active sites. Although catalyst preparation methods have been widely studied, the use of Fe/N/C catalysts in fuel cells is still a challenge, especially in terms of durability at high voltages [5, 17].

In this study, we developed a novel Fe, N, S-doped porous carbon (FeNS-PC) with high catalytic activity in the ORR in an acidic medium. Melamine formaldehyde (MF) resin, which has a high N content (45 wt%) and good thermostability, was selected as the C and N precursors. Fe(SCN)3 was used as the Fe source because it can provide both Fe and S. More importantly, CaCl2, which can be easily removed under mild conditions, was used as a template to create a porous structure. The MF resin can only be converted to porous carbon at temperatures higher than 900 ℃ under Fe catalysis. The catalyst heat treated at this temperature (FeNS-PC-900) had a high BET surface area and porosity, and showed high ORR activity in an acidic medium, as well as superior durability and methanol tolerance. The high performance of a PEMFC with FeNS-PC-900 as the cathode shows that the FeNS-PC-900 catalyst has good potential applications.

2 Experimental
2.1 Synthesis of Fe, N, S-doped porous carbon

Scheme 1 shows the synthesis of FeNS-PC. The first step was polymerization of MF resin [18]. In brief, melamine (1.97 g, 15.6 mmol) and formaldehyde aqueous solution (37%, 3 mL) were dispersed in deionized water (30 mL) by magnetic stirring. The temperature was controlled at 70 ℃. Then 0.1 mol/L NaOH (1 mL) was added to the mixture to adjust the pH to 8-9. The melamine powder dissolved in a few minutes and the solution became transparent. After stirring for 1 h, the pH was adjusted to 5-6 by addition of 1 mol/L HCl (0.2 mL) to accelerate resin polymerization. CaCl2 (2.22 g, 20 mmol) and KSCN (2.92 g, 30 mmol) were added to the mixture, followed by dropwise addition of FeCl3 aqueous solution (1 mol/L, 10 mmol, 10 mL) under vigorous stirring. The temperature was increased to 85 ℃ and maintained for 24 h. The solvent was evaporated from the mixture at 85 ℃ in air, and the residue was thoroughly dried at 80 ℃ in a vacuum oven overnight. After thorough drying of the precursors, the CaCl2 particles act as buffers to prevent thermo-crosslinking of the MF resin, and as a template to prevent collapse of the carbon skeleton. Unlike silica templates, CaCl2 can be easily removed by acid leaching without using highly toxic and corrosive conditions.

Scheme1. Synthesis of Fe, N, S-doped porous carbon.

The obtained monoliths (3 g) were ground to fine powders, followed by heat treatment at 800-1000 ℃ in Ar for 1 h. The sample was subjected to acid leaching in 1 mol/L HCl at 80 ℃ for 7 h to remove the template and inactive species by etching. The sample was separated by centrifugation and rinsed three times. Finally, the catalyst was subjected to a second heat treatment at the same temperature for 3 h; the product was denoted by FeNS-PC-T, where T is the heat-treatment temperature (℃).

2.2 Characterization

The sample morphology was investigated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEM-1400) at 100 kV. Annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (ADF-STEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping were performed using a Philips-FEI TECNAI F20 instrument at 200 kV. The BET surface area was determined using a Micromeritics TriStar II 3020 instrument. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed using a Rigaku Ultima IV diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS; Qtac-100 LEISS-XPS) was used to investigate the elemental compositions and chemical states.

All electrocatalytic properties were investigated using a rotating ring-disk electrode (RRDE) system (Pine Inc.) connected to a CHI-760D bipotentiostat. The working electrode was prepared by dropping catalyst ink onto a polished glassy carbon electrode (f = 5.61 mm) and drying under an infrared lamp in air, to give a loading of 0.6 mg/cm2. A laboratory-made reversible hydrogen electrode and a graphite plate were used as the reference electrode and counter electrode, respectively. The rotational speed was fixed at 900 r/min and the potential scan rate was 10 mV/s. The potential of the Pt ring electrode was kept at 1.3 V to oxidize H2O2. The electrolytes were 0.1 mol/L H2SO4 for non-precious-metal catalysts, and 0.1 mol/L HClO4 for a Pt/C (20 wt%) catalyst. The Pt/C loading was 0.1 mg/cm2.

The kinetic current of the catalyst was calculated using the Koutecky-Levich equation to correct the mass transfer:

1/i = 1/iL + 1/ik

where i, iL, and ik are the measured current, the diffusion-limited current, and the kinetic current, respectively. The mass activity (jm) was obtained by normalizing ik with the catalyst loading.

The H2O2 yield was calculated from the oxygen reduction current (ID) and the H2O2 oxidation current (IR) according to the following equation:

H2O2 yield = 200IR/(N0ID + IR)

where N0 = 0.386 ± 0.002 is the Pt ring collection efficiency, ID is the disk current, and IR is the ring current.

2.3 PEMFC test

The synthesized catalyst was used as the cathode in a PEMFC. A typical catalyst ink was prepared by dispersing FeNS-PC-T (26 mg) and 5 wt% Nafion solution (600 μL) in deionized water (1 mL) by sonication for 1 h. The ink was directly coated on hydrophobic treated carbon paper at a loading of 4 mg/cm2. The Nafion content of the catalyst layer was about 50 wt%. For the anode, the catalyst was a commercial Pt/C (40 wt%) catalyst with a loading of 0.4 mgPt/cm2. Membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) were fabricated by hot-pressing the anode, cathode, and an NRE 211 Nafion membrane at 3 MPa for 135 s. The performance of the fuel cell was assessed using a Model 850e fuel cell test system (Scribner Associates Inc.) operated at 80 ℃. The H2 and O2 flow rates were 0.3 L/min at 100% relative humidity and the back pressure was 1 bar.

3 Results and discussion

The morphologies and structures of the FeNS-PC materials greatly depended on the heat-treatment temperature because no additional carbon supports were used. Fig. 1(a)-(e) shows typical TEM images of FeNS-PC-800, FeNS-PC-900, and FeNS-PC-1000. The images show that the MF resin was converted to porous carbon at high temperatures by Fe catalysis [19]. Fe-containing nanoparticles can be seen in FeNS-PC-800. FeNS-PC-900 and FeNS-PC-1000 were free of crystallized nanoparticles. Irregular porous structures can be clearly observed in the enlarged TEM images of FeNS-PC-900 and FeNS-PC-1000 (Fig. 1(c) and (e), respectively). A porous structure facilitates mass transfer and therefore improves the activity. We also synthesized a sample by heat treatment at 900 ℃ but without addition of CaCl2 to investigate the effects of using CaCl2 as a template. Fig. 1(f) shows that large Fe-containing nanoparticles with thick carbon shells were formed instead of porous carbon, which would not give a high surface area and good ORR catalytic activity. This confirms the important role of CaCl2 in creating a porous structure. The mechanism of porous structure formation by CaCl2 may be as follows. CaCl2 dissolved in the aqueous reaction mixture during polymerization of the MF resin, along with KSCN and FeCl3. After thorough drying of the precursors, the recrystallized CaCl2 nanoparticles were dispersed uniformly throughout the MF resin. The inert CaCl2 nanoparticles acted as a template and prevented thermo-crosslinking of the MF resin at high temperatures and collapse of the carbon skeleton. During acid leaching, the channels formed by the dissolution of CaCl2 particles also facilitated exposure of Fe-containing nanoparticles to the acid. Porous carbon was therefore obtained.

Fig. 1. TEM images of FeNS-PC-800 (a), FeNS-PC-900 (b, c), FeNS-PC-1000 (d, e), and sample without added CaCl2 (f).

The textural properties of FeNS-PC-800, FeNS-PC-900, and FeNS-PC-1000 were investigated based on their N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (Fig. 2(a)). The calculated BET surface areas of FeNS-PC-800, FeNS-PC-900, and FeNS-PC-1000 were 544, 775, and 848 m2/g, respectively. The low BET surface area of FeNS-PC-800 can be attributed to the formation of Fe-containing nanoparticles. The difference between the surface areas of FeNS-PC-900 and FeNS-PC-1000 was small because of their similar morphologies and structures.

Fig. 2. N2 sorption isotherms (a) and XRD patterns (b) of FeNS-PC-800 (1), FeNS-PC-900 (2), and FeNS-PC-1000 (3).

XRD was used to determine the crystal structures of FeNS-PC-800, FeNS-PC-900, and FeNS-PC-1000; the results are shown in Fig. 2(b). The XRD pattern of FeNS-PC-800 shows the presence of metallic Fe and FeS nanoparticles, which is consistent with the TEM results. These Fe-containing nanoparticles were probably covered by carbon shells and survived acid leaching. The broad peak at around 25.5° indicates the co-existence of porous carbon. The FeNS-PC-900 and FeNS-PC-1000 show only two main peaks, at 2θ = 25.5° and 43°, originating from the (002) and (101) reflections, respectively, of graphene. The absence of peaks from CaCl2 in the XRD patterns indicates thorough removal of the CaCl2 template, in agreement with the TEM observations. EDS indicated that the atomic concentration of Ca in FeNS-PC-900 was only 0.17% (or 0.52 wt%), confirming that the most of the CaCl2 template had been removed. The residual CaCl2 was probably located inside the porous carbon.

The elemental distribution in FeNS-PC-900 was determined using ADF-STEM mapping analysis. Fig. 3 shows that the major doping elements (C, N, O, S, and Fe) were all distributed uniformly on the porous carbon. Two factors could be responsible for this uniform distribution. (1) Fe(SCN)3, which was used as the Fe and S precursor, was well dispersed in the MF resin, which has a high N content of 45 wt%. (2) Heteroatom doping was achieved simultaneously with porous carbon generation during heat treatment, leading to anchoring of the heteroatoms in the carbon matrix. All aggregated Fe-containing particles were removed thoroughly by acid leaching.

Fig. 3. ADF-STEM image (a) and EDS elemental mapping of C (b), N (c), O (d), S (e), and Fe (f) in FeNS-PC-900.

The elemental compositions and relevant chemical states of FeNS-PC-T (T = 800, 900, and 1000) were determined using XPS. The survey scan spectra show that the amount of doped N decreased significantly with increasing heat-treatment temperature; this might affect the ORR activity. Fig. 4(a) and Table 1 show that the main elements in FeNS-PC-T were C, N, O, S, and Fe. The atomic concentrations of these elements in FeNS-PC-900 were 84.81%, 6.62%, 7.45%, 0.82%, and 0.31%, respectively. The N and Fe contents of FeNS-PC-800 were 12.07% and 1.27%, respectively, both higher than those of FeNS-PC-900. This can be attributed to less loss of N species by volatilization at low temperatures and the formation of Fe-containing nanoparticles. The N, S, and Fe species in FeNS-PC-1000 were almost completely volatilized and could hardly be detected in the final product. Although XPS showed that FeNS-PC-1000 had the highest O content, EDS suggested that the O atomic concentrations of FeNS-PC-800, FeNS-PC-900, and FeNS-PC-1000 were 7.38%, 8.59% and 6.50%, respectively (Table 2). Oxygen-containing functional groups were probably introduced during post-treatment and when the catalysts were exposed to air. The N and S contents were also determined using EDS and CHNS elemental analysis. The results are consistent with those obtained using XPS (Tables 2 and 3). Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy showed that the Fe contents of FeNS-PC-800, FeNS-PC-900, and FeNS-PC-1000 were 19.6, 3.4, and 2.8 wt%, respectively. Fe doping is important in improving the ORR activities of non-precious-metal catalysts, especially in acidic media.

Fig. 4. (a) XPS survey spectra of FeNS-PC-T (T = 800, 900, 1000); high-resolution N 1s (b), S 2p (c), and Fe 2p (d) XPS spectra of FeNS-PC-900. Inset in (b) shows schematic diagram of different bonding configurations of N: N1, pyridinic; N2, pyrrolic; N3, graphitic; and N4, oxidized.
Table 1
Element atomic concentrations of FeNS-PC-T (T = 800, 900, 1000) determined using XPS.
Table 2
EDS elemental analysis of atomic concentrations of FeNS-PC-T (T = 800, 900, 1000).
Table 3
CHNS elemental analysis of FeNS-PC-T (T = 800, 900, 1000).

The high-resolution N 1s spectrum of FeNS-PC-900 (Fig. 4(b)) can be deconvoluted into four peaks, assigned to pyridinic N (N1), pyrrolic N (N2), graphitic N (N3), and oxidized N (N4), with binding energies of 398.3, 400.1, 401.3, and 404.8 eV, respectively [20]. The inset in Fig. 4(b) shows a schematic diagram of the different bonding configurations of N. However, only pyridinic N and graphitic N give good ORR catalytic activities [21]. The percentages of pyridinic N and graphitic N were 33.9% and 37.8%, respectively, calculated from the peak areas. The difference between the pyridinic N and Fe-N species binding energies is small; therefore Fe-N species may also contribute to the pyridinic N peak [16]. The high-resolution S 2p spectrum of FeNS-PC-900 can be deconvoluted into three peaks, as shown in Fig. 4(c). The two peaks with binding energies of 163.8 and 165.0 eV can be assigned to S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2 of a thiophene-type C-S-C structure in the carbon matrix [22]. The peak at around 168.2 eV can be ascribed to -SOx species. According to previous reports [23], additional S doping would increase the number of structural defects and the electronic distribution because of the large size, electronegativity, and polarizability of the S atom. Fe, N, S co-doping has a synergistic effect and facilitates the ORR. Fig. 4(d) shows the high-resolution Fe 2p spectrum of FeNS-PC-900; both Fe2+ and Fe3+ were present in the FeNS-PC-900 catalyst.

The electrocatalytic activities of FeNS-PC-800, FeNS-PC-900, and FeNS-PC-1000 in the ORR were examined in O2-saturated 0.1 mol/L H2SO4 solution using an RRDE system. For comparison, a commercial Pt/C (20 wt%) catalyst was tested, but in O2-saturated 0.1 mol/L HClO4 solution to avoid specific adsorption of SO42- on the Pt surface. The ORR polarization curves for FeNS-PC-800, FeNS-PC-900, FeNS-PC-1000 (0.6 mg/cm2), and Pt/C (0.1 mg/cm2) are shown in Fig. 5(a). It is apparent that the heat-treatment temperature plays an important role in inducing catalytic active sites. The MF resin was not completely converted to porous carbon at low temperatures (800 or 700 ℃). However, a too-high temperature (1000 ℃) resulted in loss of all N species, as shown by elemental composition analysis. The optimal pyrolysis temperature was 900 ℃. The half-wave potentials (E1/2) of FeNS-PC-800, FeNS-PC-900, and FeNS-PC-1000 were 0.757, 0.811, and 0.723 V, respectively, and the apparent current densities at 0.8 V were 1.16, 2.47, and 0.28 mA/cm2, respectively. The kinetic current, which reflects the intrinsic activity, can be calculated using the Koutecky-Levich equation to correct the mass transfer effect. Normalizing the kinetic current with the catalyst loading gave a mass activity for FeNS-PC-900 at 0.8 V of 10.2 A/g, which is 3.6 times that of FeNS-PC-800 (2.8 A/g) and 20.4 times that of FeNS-PC-1000 (0.5 A/g). The E1/2 of FeNS-PC-900 was only 78 mV lower than that of the Pt/C catalyst, showing that FeNS-PC-900 is one of the best non-precious-metal catalysts reported to date [24-26]. The outstanding ORR activity of FeNS-PC-900 can be attributed to the high level of heteroatom doping and uniform atomic distribution of the Fe, N, and S dopants, which improve the intrinsic activity and active site density. The high surface area and porous structure provide channels to/from the internal active sites, facilitating the transport of reactants and products. In contrast, although FeNS-PC-800 had higher Fe, N, and S weight contents, TEM and XRD results showed that considerable portions of Fe and S were present as nanoparticles. Unlike dispersed Fe atoms, aggregated Fe-containing nanoparticles cannot catalyze the ORR; they decreased the surface area (544 m2/g for FeNS-PC-800 and 775 m2/g for FeNS-PC-900) and therefore decreased the ORR activity. For FeNS-PC-1000, which has a similar porous structure, the poor ORR activity can be attributed to low heteroatom doping.

Fig. 5. ORR polarization curves (a) and H2O2 yields (b) for FeNS-PC-T (T = 800, 900, 1000) and Pt/C (20 wt%) catalyst. Catalyst loadings were 0.6 mg/cm2 for FeNS-PC-T and 0.1 mg/cm2 for Pt/C (or 20 μgPt/cm2). The electrolytes were O2-saturated 0.1 mol/L H2SO4 for FeNS-PC-T and 0.1 mol/L HClO4 for Pt/C. Rotational speed: 900 r/min; scan rate: 10 mV/s.

The H2O2 yields were evaluated by detecting the H2O2 oxidation current at the Pt ring electrode. Although their ORR activities differed greatly, there were only small differences among the H2O2 yields on FeNS-PC-800, FeNS-PC-900, and FeNS-PC-1000, as shown in Fig. 5(b). FeNS-PC-900 gave the lowest H2O2 yield; the maximum value was 4.6%. Pt/C gave a much lower H2O2 yield, with a maximum value of 1.6%. The average electron transfer number per reduced O2 molecule can be calculated as ne = 4 - (H2O2 yield/50%). The ne for FeNS-PC-900 was greater than 3.91 across the whole potential range. At 0.8 V, the H2O2 yield on FeNS-PC-900 was only 0.9% and the corresponding ne was 3.98, indicating excellent four-electron pathway selectivity.

The electrochemical durability of FeNS-PC-900 was tested by performing an accelerated durability test (ADT) between 0.6 and 1.0 V in O2-saturated 0.1 mol/L H2SO4. The scan rate was 50 mV/s. After 10000 potential cycles, the E1/2 of FeNS-PC-900 had decreased by only 20 mV, as shown in Fig. 6(a). The apparent current densities at 0.8 V of FeNS-PC-900 before and after the ADT were 2.30 and 1.67 mA/cm2, respectively. The corresponding mass activity decreased from 8.73 to 4.87 A/g, a loss of 44% of the initial activity. For the Pt/C catalyst, the E1/2 decreased by 19 mV under the same conditions (Fig. 6(b)). This result indicates that the stability of FeNS-PC-900 is similar to that of Pt/C under potential cycling conditions.

Fig. 6. ORR polarization curves of FeNS-PC-900 (a) and Pt/C (b) before and after 10000 potential cycles between 0.6-1.0 V at 50 mV/s in acidic medium; (c) chronoamperometric durability tests of FeNS-PC-900 and Pt/C catalysts at 0.75 V; and (d) methanol tolerances of FeNS-PC-900 and Pt/C. Catalyst loadings were 0.6 mg/cm2 for FeNS-PC-900 and 0.1 mg/cm2 for Pt/C. Pt/C was tested in HClO4.

The durability of FeNS-PC-900 was further evaluated by chronoamperometry at 0.75 V in O2-saturated 0.1 mol/L H2SO4. The rotational speed was fixed at 900 r/min. The same experiment was conducted with Pt/C, except the electrolyte was O2-saturated 0.1 mol/L HClO4. Fig. 6(c) shows that the ORR activity of FeNS-PC-900 decreased slowly and 84.4% of the initial current was maintained after 10000 s of an RDE test. In contrast, the ORR current of Pt/C declined rapidly and only 42.9% of the initial activity was retained, probably because of the inhibiting effect of Pt-O species formed on the Pt surface at 0.75 V. The same E1/2 degradation and superior ORR activity retention compared with those of Pt/C both demonstrate the excellent durability of FeNS-PC-900, which can be attributed to robust doping of heteroatoms into the porous carbon framework.

Catalytic selectivity is also important in practical fuel cell systems in the case of fuel crossover, e.g., of methanol. The methanol tolerances of FeNS-PC-900 and Pt/C were tested by injecting methanol into the electrolyte during chronoamperometric measurements (Fig. 6(d)). FeNS-PC-900 showed excellent methanol tolerance and the ORR current barely changed in the presence of methanol (0.5 mol/L). In contrast, the Pt/C catalyst clearly lacked methanol resistance. The ORR current was immediately converted to a methanol oxidation current when methanol was added. High methanol tolerance makes FeNS-PC-900 a promising catalyst for use in direct methanol fuel cells.

Based on the high ORR activity and durability of FeNS-PC-900 in an acidic medium, we fabricated an MEA with FeNS-PC-900 (4 mg/cm2) as the cathode, Pt/C (40 wt%, 0.4 mgPt/cm2) as the anode, and a Nafion 211 membrane. The MEA was tested in a PEMFC system at 80 ℃. Fig. 7(a) shows the polarization curve and power density plots of the PEMFC. The peak power density was 0.49 W/cm2. The porous structure may facilitate the transport of ORR-relevant species and contribute to the high power density [27].

The long-term durability of PEMFCs using non-precious-metal catalysts, especially at high operating potentials (> 0.50 V), is still a challenge. Fig. 7(b) shows that the current density of the fabricated fuel cell degraded slowly and 65% of the initial activity was maintained after operation for 10 h at a constant voltage of 0.6 V. The current density of the PEMFC declined from 397 to 259 mA/cm2. The performance degradation can be attributed to the decay of ORR active sites and partial water flooding of the catalyst layer.

Fig. 7. Polarization and power density curves (a) and long-term durability test (b) of PEMFC using FeNS-PC-900 as the cathode catalyst and a Nafion 211 membrane.
4 Conclusions

We synthesized an excellent non-precious-metal ORR electrocatalyst based on Fe, N, S-doped porous carbon by carbonization of a mixture of MF resin and Fe(SCN)3, using CaCl2 as a template, at 900 ℃ (FeNS-PC-900). The CaCl2 was easily removed without using tedious and highly corrosive procedures. Simultaneous Fe, N and S doping and porous carbon formation gave a uniform distribution of dopants. The mass activity of the FeNS-PC-900 catalyst was 10.2 A/g at 0.8 V in an acidic medium. The durability and methanol resistance of FeNS-PC-900 were better than those of a state-of-the-art Pt/C catalyst. The FeNS-PC-900 catalyst also showed high activity in a PEMFC; a peak power density of 0.49 W/cm2 and good long-term durability were achieved. The results show that FeNS-PC-900 is a promising alternative ORR catalyst for acid fuel cells.

References
[1] Y. Wang, K. S. Chen, J. Mishler, S. C. Cho, X. C. Adroher, Appl. Energy, 2011, 88: 981–1007. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.09.030
[2] Y. Nie, L. Li, Z. D. Wei, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44: 2168–2201. DOI:10.1039/C4CS00484A
[3] Y. J. Wang, N. N. Zhao, B. Z. Fang, H. Li, X. T. Bi, H. J. Wang, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115: 3433–3467. DOI:10.1021/cr500519c
[4] F. Jaouen, E. Proietti, M. Lef, è vre, R. Chenitz, J. P. Dodelet, G. Wu, H. T. Chung, C. M. Johnston, P. Zelenay, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4: 114–130. DOI:10.1039/C0EE00011F
[5] M. H. Shao, Q. W. Chang, J. P. Dodelet, R. Chenitz, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116: 3594–3657. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00462
[6] M. Lef, è vre, E. Proietti, F. Jaouen, J. P. Dodelet, Science, 2009, 324: 71–74. DOI:10.1126/science.1170051
[7] G. Wu, K. L. More, C. M. Johnston, P. Zelenay, Science, 2011, 332: 443–447. DOI:10.1126/science.1200832
[8] E. Proietti, F. Jaouen, M. Lef, è vre, N. Larouche, J. Tian, J. Herranz, J. P. Dodelet, Nat. Commun., 2011, 2: 416. DOI:10.1038/ncomms1427
[9] Y. G. Li, W. Zhou, H. L. Wang, L. M. Xie, Y. Y. Liang, F. Wei, J. C. Idrobo, S. J. Pennycook, H. J. Dai, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2012, 7: 394–400. DOI:10.1038/nnano.2012.72
[10] L. Z. Gu, L. H. Jiang, X. N. Li, J. T. Jin, J. H. Wang, G. Q. Sun, Chin. J. Catal., 2016, 37: 539–548. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(15)61049-X
[11] C. Chen, X. Zhang, Z. Y. Zhou, X. D. Yang, X. S. Zhang, S. G. Sun, Electrochim. Acta, 2016, 222: 1922–1930. DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.005
[12] Y. C. Wang, Y. J. Lai, L. Song, Z. Y. Zhou, J. G. Liu, Q. Wang, X. D. Yang, C. Chen, W. Shi, Y. P. Zheng, M. Rauf, S. G. Sun, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54: 9907–9910. DOI:10.1002/anie.201503159
[13] X. G. Su, J. G. Liu, Y. F. Yao, Y. You, X. Zhang, C. Y. Zhao, H. Wan, Y. Zhou, Z. G. Zou, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51: 16707–16709. DOI:10.1039/C5CC06413A
[14] J. Y. Cheon, T. Kim, Y. M. Choi, H. Y. Jeong, M. G. Kim, Y. J. Sa, J. Kim, Z. Lee, T. H. Yang, K. Kwon, O. Terasaki, G. G. Park, R. R. Adzic, S. H. Joo, Sci. Rep., 2013, 3: 2715.
[15] R. Silva, D. Voiry, M. Chhowalla, T. Asefa, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135: 7823–7826. DOI:10.1021/ja402450a
[16] H. W. Liang, W. Wei, Z. S. Wu, X. L. Feng, K. Mü llen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135: 16002–16005. DOI:10.1021/ja407552k
[17] W. Ding, L. Li, K. Xiong, Y. Wang, W. Li, Y. Nie, S. G. Chen, X. Q. Qi, Z. D. Wei, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137: 5414–5420. DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b00292
[18] G. W. Yang, H. Y. Han, T. T. Li, C. Y. Du, Carbon, 2012, 50: 3753–3765. DOI:10.1016/j.carbon.2012.03.050
[19] D. Y. Zhai, H. D. Du, B. H. Li, Y. Zhu, F. Y. Kang, Carbon, 2011, 49: 725–729. DOI:10.1016/j.carbon.2010.09.057
[20] J. J. Duan, S. Chen, M. Jaroniec, S. Z. Qiao, ACS Catal., 2015, 5: 5207–5234. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.5b00991
[21] L. F. Lai, J. R. Potts, D. Zhan, L. Wang, C. K. Poh, C. H. Tang, H. Gong, Z. X. Shen, J. Y. Lin, R. S. Ruoff, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5: 7936–7942. DOI:10.1039/c2ee21802j
[22] W. Ai, Z. M. Luo, J. Jiang, J. H. Zhu, Z. Z. Du, Z. X. Fan, L. H. Xie, H. Zhang, W. Huang, T. Yu, Adv. Mater., 2014, 26: 6186–6192. DOI:10.1002/adma.201401427
[23] C. Domínguez, F. J. Pérez-Alonso, S. A. Al-Thabaiti, S. N. Basahel, A. Y. Obaid, A. O. Alyoubi, J. L. Gómez de la Fuente, S. Rojas, Electrochim. Acta, 2015, 157: 158–165. DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.031
[24] X. J. Wang, H. G. Zhang, H. H. Lin, S. Gupta, C. Wang, Z. X. Tao, H. Fu, T. Wang, J. Zheng, G. Wu, X. G. Li, Nano Energy, 2016, 25: 110–119. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.042
[25] S. M. Zhang, B. Liu, S. L. Chen, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15: 18482–18490. DOI:10.1039/c3cp53760a
[26] C. Chen, X. D. Yang, Z. Y. Zhou, Y. J. Lai, M. Rauf, Y. Wang, J. Pan, L. Zhuang, Q. Wang, Y. C. Wang, N. Tian, X. S. Zhang, S. G. Sun, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51: 17092–17095. DOI:10.1039/C5CC06562C
[27] W. Shi, Y. C. Wang, C. Chen, X. D. Yang, Z. Y. Zhou, S. G. Sun, Chin. J. Catal., 2016, 37: 1103–1108. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62471-3