催化学报  2017, Vol. 38 Issue (4): 717-725   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Xiaosu Dong
Feng Li
Ning Zhao
Yisheng Tan
Junwei Wang
Fukui Xiao
CO2 hydrogenation to methanol over Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts prepared by liquid reduction
Xiaosu Donga,b, Feng Lia, Ning Zhaoa,c, Yisheng Tana,c, Junwei Wanga,c, Fukui Xiaoa,c     
a. State Key Laboratory of Coal Conversion, Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan 030001, Shanxi, China;
b. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
c. National Engineering Research Center for Coal-Based Synthesis, Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan 030001, Shanxi, China
* Corresponding author. Feng Li, Tel/Fax: +86-351-4041153; E-mail: lifeng2729@sxicc.ac.cn
Foundation item: This work was supported by the Key Science and Technology Program of Shanxi Province, China (MD2014-10), the National Key Technology Research and Development Program (2013BAC11B00), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21343012)
Abstract: Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts containing Cu in three valence states (Cu2+, Cu+ and Cu0) were prepared using a liquid reduction method and subsequently calcined at different temperatures. The effects of the calcination temperature on the catalyst structure, interactions among components, reducibility and dispersion of Cu species, surface properties and exposed Cu surface area were systematically investigated. These materials were also applied to the synthesis of methanol via the hydrogenation of CO2. The results show that a large exposed Cu surface area promotes catalytic CO2 conversion and that there is a close correlation between the Cu+/Cu0 ratio and the selectivity for methanol. A calcination temperature of 573 K was found to produce a Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalyst exhibiting the maximum activity during the synthesis of methanol.
© 2017, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Liquid reduction method     Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalyst     Carbon dioxide hydrogenation     Methanol    
液相还原法制备Cu/Zn/Al/Zr催化剂用于CO2加氢合成甲醇
董晓素a,b, 李枫a, 赵宁a,c, 谭猗生a,c, 王军威a,c, 肖福魁a,c     
a. 中国科学院山西煤炭化学研究所煤转化国家重点实验室, 山西太原 030001;
b. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
c. 中国科学院山西煤炭化学研究所国家煤基合成工程技术研究中心, 山西太原 030001
摘要:近年来,由于大气CO2浓度增加引起的温室效应正日益威胁着人类的生存与发展,CO2的捕获与利用是有望解决温室效应和能源危机的有效途径.CO2催化转化为甲醇成为众多研究者关注的焦点,这是因为甲醇不仅是一种重要的基本化工原料,也是一种洁净的绿色燃料和能源载体.Cu基催化剂广泛应用于CO2加氢合成甲醇反应,并表现出良好的催化性能.通常,金属催化剂的制备是采用H2对金属氧化物进行还原.然而,传统的气相还原过程伴随着强烈的热效应,且需要在高温(473-573 K)下进行,会引起表面铜颗粒长大并加速其聚集烧结,使得活性组分利用率下降.近年来,以NaBH4为还原剂的液相还原法逐渐受到人们的重视,该方法操作简单、快捷且条件可控,反应在低温下进行,放出的热量可在液相环境中迅速得到转移,大大抑制了铜颗粒的聚集.因此,液相还原法可制备出高铜分散度、高活性的催化剂.焙烧温度对铜基催化剂结构和催化性能的影响已得到广泛探究,但这仅限于含二价铜物种催化剂,焙烧温度对含多种铜价态催化剂的影响未见报道.由于液相还原法制备的催化剂含有还原态的铜物种(Cu0和Cu+),它们比Cu2+具有更强的流动性,因此在后续的焙烧过程中催化剂更容易发生烧结和聚集.本文采用液相还原法合成了Cu/Zn/Al/Zr催化剂,分别于423,573,723和873 K焙烧后用于CO2加氢合成甲醇反应,考察了焙烧温度对制备的铜基催化剂结构性质和催化性能的影响,并与传统共沉淀法制备的催化剂进行了对比.结果显示,随着焙烧温度升高,铜物种聚集作用增强,金属铜颗粒尺寸增大,873 K时烧结出现显著增强.由于比表面积随焙烧温度升高而减小,高温度焙烧的催化剂具有小的表面碱性位数目.焙烧温度会影响催化剂中铜物种与其它组分的相互作用,进而影响催化剂的还原.随着焙烧温度的升高,催化剂的还原温度逐渐降低,表面Cu+/Cu0的比例先增后减.CO2加氢活性评价显示,液相还原法制备的催化剂具有更高的催化活性,尤其是甲醇选择性;随着焙烧温度升高,催化剂的CO2转化率和甲醇选择性先增后减,CZAZ-573催化剂具有最高活性,且在1000 h长周期活性测试中表现稳定.CO2转化率与催化剂暴露金属铜的比表面积密切相关.相比Cu0,产物甲醇更容易在Cu+表面催化生成,催化剂表面的Cu+/Cu0比与甲醇选择性的变化规律一致.通过调控焙烧温度可得到高Cu比表面积以及高Cu+/Cu0比的催化剂,有利于CO2加氢生成甲醇.
关键词液相还原法    Cu/Zn/Al/Zr催化剂    二氧化碳加氢    甲醇    

1 Introduction

Since global warming caused by the continually increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere is threatening human survival, new technologies based on CO2 capture and utilization have recently received much attention. The conversion of CO2 to useful chemicals and fuels may be one of the most promising approaches to mitigating this problem [1]. Methanol, due to its importance in chemical industries and its potential as an environmentally friendly energy carrier, has become the preferred conversion product [2, 3]. Therefore, CO2 catalytic conversion to methanol is a key research topic, along with the optimization of catalysts for this purpose.

Cu-based catalysts obtained from conventional co-precipitation methods are widely used for the synthesis of methanol from CO2/H2 [4, 5]. However, because of the low melting point (1356 K) and low Tammann temperature (678 K) of copper, the aggregation of metallic copper particles during the high temperature calcination, reduction and reaction processes have become significant challenges [6, 7]. Metallic Cu catalysts are typically prepared by reducing CuO with H2 [8], although this involves a highly exothermic reaction and thus there is the potential for a runaway reaction. In addition, the high temperatures applied during this process (473 to 623 K) can accelerate the agglomeration of Cu species and thus decrease the efficiency of the active catalytic sites [9]. There has recently been interest in applying a liquid reduction method to the preparation of Cu-based catalysts, because this method is rapid and readily controlled in comparison to conventional gas phase reduction with H2 [10-12]. Liquid reduction with NaBH4 is normally carried out at low temperature, thus reducing the agglomeration of Cu species and producing catalysts with smaller metallic particles [10]. Our own group formerly performed a systematic study of the difference between the co-precipitation and liquid reduction methods with regard to the subsequent efficiency of catalytic CO2 conversion to methanol. This prior work demonstrated that a catalyst fabricated by the liquid reduction method contained smaller Cu particles and exhibited superior catalytic activity and better selectivity for methanol [12].

The oxidation states of Cu species are susceptible to change during sintering and calcination processes. Many research reports have described the effects of calcination temperature on the structure and catalytic performance over conventional Cu-based catalysts containing only Cu2+ [13-16]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports concerning the effects of calcination temperature on Cu-based catalysts containing Cu species in more highly reduced states. In view of the ready aggregation of metallic copper particles, catalysts prepared by liquid reduction may exhibit complicated changes with elevation of the calcination temperature. Hence, it would be of significant interest to carry out systematic research into the properties and catalytic performance of catalysts prepared by the liquid reduction method while varying the calcination temperature.

In the present work, Cu/Zn/Al/Zr precursors were prepared by the liquid reduction method and then calcined at different temperatures. These catalysts were subsequently applied to the synthesis of methanol from CO2/H2 and also characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), N2 physisorption, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), N2O chemisorption, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), temperature-programmed reduction (TPR), and CO2 temperature-programmed desorption (TPD). The effects of calcination temperature on the physicochemical properties and catalytic performance of these catalysts are discussed in detail.

2 Experimental
2.1 Preparation of catalysts

Cu-based catalysts having the composition ratio Cu2+:Zn2+:Al3+:Zr4+ = 6:3:0.5:0.5 were prepared by the liquid reduction method. In a typical process, a solution of mixed metal nitrates (1.0 mol/L, 100 mL) and a solution of the Na2CO3 precipitant (1.2 mol/L) were added dropwise to deionized water (100 mL) with stirring at 338 K and at a constant pH value of 7.0 ± 0.2. NaBH4 (B/Cu molar ratio = 5, 11.35 g) was dissolved in a NaOH solution (0.1 mol/L, 100 mL) to prepare a reducing agent solution. After removing air from the reaction mixture, the reducing agent solution was added dropwise with stirring at 338 K under a N2 atmosphere. The resulting slurry was allowed to age for 2 h, and the precipitate was removed by filtration and washed several times with deionized water followed by a single wash with ethanol. The precipitate was then dried for 10 h at 323 K in a vacuum oven to produce the precursor materials, denoted as CZAZ herein. Samples of this CZAZ precursor were calcined at 423, 573, 723 or 873 K for 6 h under a N2 flow, to produce specimens denoted as CZAZ-423, CZAZ-573, CZAZ-723 and CZAZ-873, respectively.

For comparison purposes, a catalyst with the same composition was prepared by the co-precipitation method. After the co-precipitation resulting from combining metal nitrate and Na2CO3 solutions at 338 K and pH 7.0, the slurry was aged at 338 K for 2 h, followed by filtering, washing and drying. The dried product is denoted as cCZAZ, while cCZAZ-573 refers to the dried product after calcination for 6 h at 573 K under a N2 flow.

2.2 Characterization

Powder XRD patterns were acquired using a Panalytical X'Pert Pro X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation, operating at 40 kV and 30 mA and in the step mode (0.0167°, 12 s). Specific surface areas were determined from N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms at 77 K using a Micromeritics Tristar 3000 instrument. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed with a SETSYS EVOLUTION TGA 16/18 instrument coupled to a mass spectrometer (OminStar, Pfeiffer Vacuum). Prior to analysis, the samples were first heated to 1000 K at 10 K/min in an Ar flow. Peaks at m/z = 18 and 44 were monitored because these resulted from the main pyrolysis products H2O and CO2, respectively. The morphology of each catalyst was analyzed by SEM with an FET XL 30S-FEG instrument at an accelerating voltage of 10.0 kV. XPS was performed using an AXIS ULTRA DLD spectrometer with a monochromatic Al Kα (1486.8 eV) source. The C 1s peak (284.6 eV) served as the reference to calibrate the binding energies.

TPR data were acquired using a quartz reactor in conjunction with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) to determine the H2 consumption. Each sample (50 mg) was initially heated at 423 K under Ar to remove moisture as well as other absorbed impurities and then reduced in a flow of 10 vol% H2/Ar at a heating rate of 5 K/min up to 673 K. CO2-TPD was conducted to assess the surface basic properties, employing a mass spectrometer (OminStar, Pfeiffer Vacuum). Prior to measurement, each sample (100 mg) was first activated at 503 K for 2 h under a feed gas (H2:CO2 = 3:1) and then saturated using a CO2 flow at 323 K for 1 h. After flushing the physically adsorbed molecules from the catalyst with an Ar flow, CO2-TPD was performed at a temperature ramp of 10 K/min under Ar up to 723 K. The amount of desorbed CO2 was recorded by the mass spectrometer. The exposed Cu surface area (SCu) was determined by dissociative N2O adsorption, using a TCD to monitor the consumption of H2. Each sample (100 mg) was pretreated at 503 K under a flow of 10 vol% H2/Ar for 2 h. The reduced sample was then cooled to 323 K and purged with Ar for 1 h, after which it was exposed to 5% N2O/Ar for 1 h. Under these conditions, all exposed metallic copper was completely oxidized according to the reaction 2Cu(s) + N2O → Cu2O(s) + N2, where Cu(s) represents surface Cu atoms. After cooling to room temperature under an Ar flow, the catalyst was reduced under a 10 vol% H2/Ar flow using a temperature ramp of 5 K/min to heat the specimen from room temperature to 573 K. The amount of consumed H2 is denoted as nH2. The SCu (m2/g) value was calculated according to the equations [17]: SCu = (nCu×N) / (1.4×1019×W), where SCu is the exposed copper surface area per gram catalyst, nCu is the amount of surface metallic copper on the catalyst (nCu = 2nH2), N is Avogadro's constant (6.02×1023 atoms/mol), 1.4×1019 is the number of copper atoms per m2, and W is the mass of the test sample.

2.3 Evaluation of catalysts

Activity measurements during the synthesis of methanol from CO2/H2 were carried out in a continuous flow, high pressure, fixed-bed reactor. In each trial, 1.0 g of the catalyst (40-60 mesh) was placed in a stainless steel tube reactor after dilution with an equal volume of quartz sand. The catalysts synthesized using the liquid reduction method were directly applied to activity measurements involving CO2 hydrogenation to methanol with any further H2 reduction. The reaction conditions included a temperature of 503-543 K, a pressure of 5.0 MPa, n(H2):n(CO2) = 3:1, and a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) = 4600 h-1. The catalyst obtained by co-precipitation was reduced under pure H2 at atmospheric pressure and 503 K for 4 h prior to the activity tests. The products were quantitatively analyzed using gas chromatography (GC) in conjunction with a TCD. Gaseous products (H2, CO2, CO and CH4) were assessed with a TDX-01 column while liquid products (H2O and CH3OH) were separated with a Porapak-Q column. The CO2 conversion and the carbon-based selectivities for methanol and CO were calculated based on an internal normalization method. The space time yield (STY, g mL-1 h-1) for methanol, which gives the amount of methanol per mL catalyst per h, was calculated using the equation: STY = (W × XCH3OH)/(t × V), where W is the total mass of H2O and methanol (g), XCH3OH is the mass fraction of methanol, t is the reaction time (h), and V is the volume of catalyst (mL).

3 Results and discussion
3.1 Catalytic performance of the Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts

The catalytic activities of the Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts calcined at different temperature are summarized in Table 1. As can be seen, the CO2 conversion increases while the methanol selectivity decreases as the reaction temperature is raised, a result that is consistent with other literature reports [18-20]. Methanol and CO are the main carbon-containing products under these reaction conditions. A higher reaction temperature evidently favors both activation and the conversion of CO2, because the reverse water gas shift (RWGS) reaction (CO2 + H2 → CO + H2O) is promoted to a greater extent than the synthesis of methanol (CO2 + 3H2 → CH3OH + H2O). This occurs as a result of the endothermic nature and higher apparent activation energy of the RWGS reaction [20]. In the case of those catalysts synthesized by liquid reduction, CO2 conversion and methanol selectivity first increase and then decrease with increasing calcination temperature, and the CZAZ-573 exhibits the best catalytic performance. A maximum methanol STY value of 0.21 g mL-1 h-1 together with a CO2 conversion of 24.5% and a CH3OH selectivity of 57.6% are obtained over the CZAZ-573 at a reaction temperature of 543 K.

Table 1
Catalytic performance during CO2 hydrogenation to methanol at different reaction temperature over various Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts.

For comparison purposes, the cCZAZ-573 catalyst prepared by conventional co-precipitation was also assessed for activity. The superior CO2 conversion of the CZAZ-573 catalyst relative to that of the cCZAZ-573 gradually becomes evident with increasing calcination temperature. In addition, the methanol selectivity of the CZAZ-573 is greater than that of the cCZAZ-573 at these three reaction temperatures. The higher activities of the catalysts made using the liquid reduction method are attributed to the presence of smaller copper particles and a larger quantity of basic sites; these effects have been discussed in detail in a previous research report [12].

3.2 Textural and structural properties

The XRD patterns of the Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts are shown in Fig. 1. The diffraction peaks generated by the CZAZ precursor and calcined samples at 2θ = 43.3° and 50.4° correspond to the (111) and (200) planes of the Cu phase (JCPDS 04-0836). Characteristic diffraction peaks assignable to a Cu2O phase (JCPDS 05-0667) are only observed in the calcined samples, implying that the Cu2O phase in the CZAZ precursor is highly dispersed and so below the XRD detection, and that the dispersed Cu2O particles tend to aggregate during calcination. These results suggest that the liquid reduction process reduces Cu2+ to Cu and Cu+. Diffraction peaks for the ZnO phase (JCPDS 36-1451) are observed, while Al2O3 and ZrO2 are not evident as separate phases, and so may have been highly dispersed in amorphous forms or with very small particle sizes, or interacted with other metal oxides [21, 22]. With increasing calcination temperature, the characteristic diffraction peaks ascribed to the Cu and Cu2O phases exhibit an ongoing increase in intensity, owing to grain growth during the thermal treatment [23]. Notably, in the case of the CZAZ-873 sample, the intensity of the diffraction peak at 2θ = 43.3° assigned to Cu(111) planes increases dramatically, demonstrating that metallic Cu particles undergo dramatic growth at excessively high temperatures.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of the Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts.

Fig. 2 presents the XRD patterns of the Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts after the typical activation procedure (pretreated at 503 K with a feed gas). It can be seen that the characteristic Cu2O diffraction peaks disappear, demonstrating that the catalysts undergo a secondary vapor phase reduction during the activation procedure. In addition, the intensity of the peaks attributed to the Cu phase increase significantly in comparison to that in Fig. 1, as a result of this secondary reduction and the aggregation of Cu particles during the high temperature treatment. The average Cu grain crystal sizes were calculated from the Cu(111) reflections using the Scherrer equation and were found to increase along with the calcination temperature (Table 2), indicating that the calcination temperature has a significant effect on the size of the metallic Cu particles.

Fig. 2. XRD patterns of the Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts after gas phase activation.
Table 2
Physicochemical properties of the Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts.

As shown in Table 2, the specific surface area decreases from 52.0 m2/g for CZAZ-423 to 21.7 m2/g for CZAZ-873 with increasing calcination temperature. The growth of crystal grains and/or the agglomeration of particles at higher temperatures are responsible for the changes in the BET surface area and dCu [24]. The exposed Cu surface areas determined from N2O dissociative adsorption measurements undergo a continuous decrease from CZAZ-573 to CZAZ-873, due to increasing aggregation of Cu particles. Interestingly, the CZAZ-423 sample has a relatively low SCu as a result of the high reduction temperature applied to this material (Fig. 6). This high temperature produces Cu species that are not fully reduced under the activation conditions.

Fig. 3. (a) TG curves of Cu/Zn/Al/Zr precursors; (b) Mass spectra of the gaseous reduction products generated by these precursors.
Fig. 4. SEM images of the Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts.
Fig. 5. Cu 2p spectra (a) and Cu LMM Auger electron spectra (b) of the Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts; Cu 2p spectra (c) and Cu LMM Auger electron spectra (d) of the Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts after activation under a feed gas.
Fig. 6. TPR profiles of the Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts.

To allow for further investigations of the thermal decomposition behaviors of these catalysts, the dried products obtained from both the liquid reduction and co-precipitation methods were assessed by TGA in conjunction with mass spectrometry (Fig. 3). The cCZAZ sample, having a zincian-malachite precursor structure [12], exhibits three mass loss peaks with a total mass loss of approximately 25.7%. There are labeled in the figure, where W1, W2 and W3 correspond to the loss of physisorbed water [25], zincian-malachite phase decomposition along with the release of H2O and CO2, and the decomposition of stable Cu/Zn hydroxocarbonates [22] with only CO2 release. In contrast, the CZAZ precursor undergoes a mass loss of about 12.9%. A broad H2O peak is observed while little CO2 is released during the thermal decomposition process, suggesting that hydroxy carbonates in this material are primarily transformed to metal/metal oxides during the liquid reduction process, in accordance with the XRD results in Fig. 1.

Fig. 4 presents SEM images of Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts calcined at different temperatures. It can be seen that the catalysts are composed of either spherical or rod-like particles. With increasing calcination temperature, the spherical particles, with a size distribution in the range of 30-60 nm in the CZAZ-423, grow to 50-120 nm in the CZAZ-873. This result is in good agreement with the N2 physisorption data. The rod-like particles are composed of the ZnO phase according to high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and scanning TEM-energy dispersive spectroscopy results [12]. These rods are approximately 300-500 nm in length. Instead of promoting strong interactions among each component, as occurs during the conventional co-precipitation method, the liquid reduction process results in the migration of Cu species from the co-precipitation slurry, such that the ZnO, undergoing less bonding, is inclined to grow into rod-like particles with good crystallinity.

3.3 XPS analysis

XPS data were acquired to determine the surface oxidation states of copper in these materials as well as their chemical compositions. Both Cu 2p3/2 and Cu 2p1/2 peaks are evident along with their satellite peaks in Fig. 5(a), indicating the presence of Cu2+ [23, 26]. The characteristic binding energies of Cu 2p3/2 from Cu0, Cu+ and Cu2+ are located at 932.2-933.1, 932.0-932.8 and 933.2-934.6 eV, respectively [27]. It is noteworthy that the Cu 2p3/2 peaks are broad and bifurcated, which suggests that the catalysts possess more than one Cu species. These peaks can actually be deconvoluted into a large, narrow peak at 932.2 eV (attributed to Cu0 and/or Cu+ species) and a small, broad peak around 934.5 eV (assigned to Cu2+ species) [28]. Cu LMM Auger electron spectroscopy data were also acquired to assess the surface Cu valence states, as shown in Fig. 5(b). A principal peak with a broad profile is evident at about 916.8 eV, demonstrating that Cu+ is the predominant copper species on the surface, while peaks attributed to Cu2+ (917.9 eV) and Cu0 (918.8 eV) are indistin guishable owing to their low surface levels. The Cu2+ sites have evidently been completely reduced to Cu0 and/or Cu+ sites during the typical activation procedure, as evidenced by the absence of Cu 2p satellite peaks inFig. 5(c). To distinguish between Cu0 and Cu+ species, the Cu LMM Auger electron spectroscopy data for activated catalysts are presented Fig. 5(d). Here a principal peak at 918.8 eV (Cu0) and a smaller peak at 916.8 eV (Cu+) are observed. To assist in these investigations, the relative Cu+/Cu0 ratios of the catalyst surfaces were calculated and are presented in Table 2. These values increase in the order CZAZ-873 < CZAZ-423 < CZAZ-723 < CZAZ-573. Typically, Cu-based catalysts simultaneously contain Cu0 and Cu+ on their surfaces after reduction, and the Cu+ species may strongly interact with other components [28, 29]. In the case of activated catalysts prepared by liquid reduction, these surface Cu+ species may result from the reduction of Cu2+ species strongly interacting with other metal oxides or may represent Cu+ species that are difficult to reduce to Cu0. The Cu0 species are from the readily reduced compounds CuO and Cu2O. Thus, the value of Cu+/Cu0 can be an important indication of the interaction between Cu species and other metal oxides.

3.4 Reducibility of the Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts

TPR measurements were carried out to study the reduction behavior of the catalysts. As shown in Fig. 6, these samples generate a broad peak in the temperature range from 420 to 550 K, attributed to the reduction of CuO and Cu2O. It can be seen that the catalysts prepared by the co-precipitation and liquid reduction methods show some differences in their reduction behavior. Compared with the cCZAZ-573 catalyst, the reduction peak area of the CZAZ-573 is decreased following liquid reduction, and its reduction temperature shifts to a lower temperature due to the weakened interactions in this material [12]. Catalysts obtained from liquid reduction and calcined at different temperature demonstrate that the initial reduction temperature shifts to lower values with increasing calcination temperature. Furthermore, the peak pattern becomes sharper and more symmetrical on going from 423 to 723 K. The broad peaks indicate the presence of several species or states, all being reduced at approximately the same temperature, whereas the sharp peaks demonstrate the existence of a single species or state. These changes in peak patterns likely reflect the effect of the high calcination temperature, which produces a more homogeneous distribution of Cu species [30].

3.5 Surface basicity of the Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts

The CO2 desorption profiles of the Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts after the typical activation procedure are shown in Fig. 7. The profiles can be assigned to three scenarios representing three types of basic sites: weakly basic (surface OH- groups), moderately basic (metal-oxygen pairs, such as Zn-O and Zr-O) and strongly basic (low coordination oxygen atoms) [31, 32]. The differences in the positions of the desorption peaks among these samples are minimal except in the case of the strongly basic sites of the CZAZ-423 sample, suggesting that calcination temperature has no significant effect on the strength of basic sites. However, an ongoing decrease in the amount of basic sites is observed with increasing calcination temperature, primarily attributed to a decrease in the specific surface area.

Fig. 7. CO2-TPD profiles of the Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts after the typical activation process under a feed gas.
3.6 Long-term stability tests

Fig. 8 presents the long-term stability test data for the CZAZ-573 sample during the synthesis of methanol via CO2 hydrogenation at 523 K, 5.0 MPa and a GHSV of 4600 h-1. It can be seen that the CO2 conversion and methanol selectivity obtained from the catalyst remain stable during a continuous 1000 h trial. These results demonstrate that the CZAZ-573 sample shows steady catalytic performance under the investigated reaction conditions.

Fig. 8. Long-term stability test data for the CZAZ-573 catalyst over 1000 h. Reaction conditions: P = 5.0 MPa, n(H2):n(CO2) = 3:1, T = 523 K, GHSV = 4600 h-1.

Many researchers have pointed out that the activity of Cu-based catalysts during CO2 hydrogenation to methanol is closely related to the exposed copper surface area (SCu) [19, 20, 30, 33-37]. In this work, SCu was found to first increase and then decrease with increasing calcination temperature, while CO2 conversion showed a similar trend following the elevation of the calcination temperature, as shown in Fig. 9. However, the relationship between CO2 conversion and SCu is not linear, a result that is consistent with other reports [38-40]. These results confirm that there must be some other factors affecting the catalytic performance during the synthesis of methanol from CO2/H2.

It is generally accepted that the coordination, chemisorption and activation of CO2 and the homogeneous splitting of hydrogen take place on Cu0 and Cu+ [22, 33, 41-43]. Thus, Cu0 and Cu+ sites on the catalyst surface are important in determining the catalytic performance during CO2 hydrogenation to methanol [33, 41, 42, 44]. In comparison to Cu0 species, Cu+ species on the catalyst surface may represent electropositive sites that strongly interact with other components. As such, the Cu+/Cu0 ratio can be an important indicator of the interaction between Cu species and other metal oxides. In fact, it is well known that the RWGS reaction is promoted to a greater extent by metallic copper than by partially oxidized copper [41]. Toyir et al. [41] prepared Ga-promoted Cu-based catalysts with high selectivity for methanol production from CO2/H2 and attributed this selectivity to the presence of Cu+ species on the catalyst surface. Saito et al. [33] found that higher activities during methanol synthesis over a multicomponent Cu/ZnO-based catalyst were obtained when the value Cu+/Cu0 was approximately 0.7. In the case of the present Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts prepared by liquid reduction with different calcination temperatures, the Cu+/Cu0 ratios (Table 2) first increase then decrease with increasing calcination temperature. The methanol selectivity exhibit a similar trend, further verifying that the Cu+/Cu0 value has a close relationship with methanol selectivity. Overall, a high value of Cu+/Cu0 achieved by selecting an appropriate calcination temperature is beneficial for the synthesis of methanol.

Fig. 9. The relationship between the CO2 conversion and SCu. Reaction conditions: P = 5.0 MPa, n(H2):n(CO2) = 3:1, T = 523 K, GHSV = 4600 h-1.
4 Conclusions

Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts prepared by a liquid reduction method were found to contain three Cu valences (Cu2+, Cu+ and Cu0), although Cu+ was the predominant copper species detectable on the surface of the precursor. The calcination temperature had a significant impact on the physicochemical properties. With increasing temperature, the specific surface area as well as the amount of basic sites decreased while the Cu particle size increased, due to higher rates of Cu aggregation. Furthermore, calcination temperature was found to affect the surface distribution and interaction of Cu species, thus leading to significant differences in reducibility and the Cu+/Cu0 value. These Cu/Zn/Al/Zr catalysts generated at different calcination temperatures were assessed during CO2 hydrogenation to methanol, and the CZAZ-573 sample showed superior activity. A CO2 conversion of 24.5% was obtained along with a methanol selectivity of 57.6% at 543 K. In addition, the CZAZ-573 sample exhibited higher activity than a cCZAZ-573 sample obtained using co-precipitation, especially with regard to methanol selectivity. A high exposed Cu surface area evidently favors CO2 catalytic conversion while a high value of Cu+/Cu0 resulting from the use of an optimal calcination temperature is evidently helpful during the synthesis of methanol.

References
[1] J. J. Wu, X. D. Zhou, Chin. J. Catal., 2016, 37: 999–1015. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62455-5
[2] G. A. Olah, A. Goeppert, G. K. S. Prakash, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74: 487–498. DOI:10.1021/jo801260f
[3] G. A. Olah, G. K. S. Prakash, A. Goeppert, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133: 12881–12898. DOI:10.1021/ja202642y
[4] M. Behrens, J. Catal., 2009, 267: 24–29. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2009.07.009
[5] O. Martin, J. Perez-Ramirez, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2013, 3: 3343–3352. DOI:10.1039/c3cy00573a
[6] A. M. Cao, R. W. Lu, G. Veser, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12: 13499–13510. DOI:10.1039/c0cp00729c
[7] S. H. Zhu, X. Q. Gao, Y. L. Zhu, W. B. Fan, J. G. Wang, Y. W. Li, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, 5: 1169–1180. DOI:10.1039/C4CY01148A
[8] L. Shi, W. Z. Shen, G. H. Yang, X. J. Fan, Y. Z. Jin, C. Y. Zeng, K. Matsuda, N. Tsubaki, J. Catal., 2013, 302: 83–90. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2013.02.025
[9] X. M. Liu, G. Q. Lu, Z. F. Yan, J. Beltramini, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2003, 42: 6518–6530. DOI:10.1021/ie020979s
[10] S. Belin, C. L. Bracey, V. Briois, P. R. Ellis, G. J. Hutchings, T. I. Hyde, G. Sankar, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2013, 3: 2944–2957. DOI:10.1039/c3cy00254c
[11] B. J. Liaw, Y. Z. Chen, Appl. Catal. A, 2001, 206: 245–256. DOI:10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00601-3
[12] X. S. Dong, F. Li, N. Zhao, F. K. Xiao, J. W. Wang, Y. S. Tan, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 191: 8–17. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.014
[13] Y. Tanaka, T. Utaka, R. Kikuchi, T. Takeguchi, K. Sasaki, K. Eguchi, J. Catal., 2003, 215: 271–278. DOI:10.1016/S0021-9517(03)00024-1
[14] C. R. Jung, J. Han, S. W. Nam, T. H. Lim, S. A. Hong, H. I. Lee, Catal. Today, 2004, 93-95: 183–190. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2004.06.039
[15] P. Djinovi, J. Batista, A. Pintar, Appl. Catal. A, 2008, 347: 23–33. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2008.05.027
[16] T. M. Ding, H. S. Tian, J. C. Liu, W. B. Wu, J. T. Yu, Chin. J. Catal., 2016, 37: 484–493. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(15)61053-1
[17] Z. L. Yuan, L. N. Wang, J. H. Wang, S. X. Xia, P. Chen, Z. Y. Hou, X. M. Zheng, Appl. Catal. B, 2011, 101: 431–440. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.10.013
[18] F. Arena, K. Barbera, G. Italiano, G. Bonura, L. Spadaro, F. Frusteri, J. Catal., 2007, 249: 185–194. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2007.04.003
[19] F. Arena, G. Mezzatesta, G. Zafarana, G. Trunfio, F. Frusteri, L. Spadaro, J. Catal., 2013, 300: 141–151. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2012.12.019
[20] X. M. Guo, D. S. Mao, G. Z. Lu, S. Wang, G. S. Wu, J. Catal., 2010, 271: 178–185. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2010.01.009
[21] M. W. Tan, X. G. Wang, X. X. Wang, X. J. Zou, W. Z. Ding, X. G. Lu, J. Catal., 2015, 329: 151–166. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2015.05.011
[22] P. Gao, F. Li, F. K. Xiao, N. Zhao, N. N. Sun, W. Wei, L. S. Zhong, Y. H. Sun, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2012, 2: 1447–1454. DOI:10.1039/c2cy00481j
[23] Y. F. Zhu, X. Kong, D. B. Cao, J. L. Cui, Y. L. Zhu, Y. W. Li, ACS Catal., 2014, 4: 3675–3681. DOI:10.1021/cs501155x
[24] X. M. Guo, D. S. Mao, G. Z. Lu, S. Wang, G. S. Wu, Catal. Commun., 2011, 12: 1095–1098. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2011.03.033
[25] G. Bonura, M. Cordaro, C. Cannilla, F. Arena, F. Frusteri, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 152-153: 152–161. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.01.035
[26] S. H. Zhu, X. Q. Gao, Y. L. Zhu, Y. F. Zhu, H. Y. Zheng, Y. W. Li, J. Catal., 2013, 303: 70–79. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2013.03.018
[27] J. Liu, C. H. Han, X. Z. Yang, G. J. Gao, Q. Q. Shi, M. Y. Tong, X. F. Liang, C. Li, J. Catal., 2016, 33: 162–170.
[28] B. Zhang, Y. L. Zhu, G. Q. Ding, H. Y. Zheng, Y. W. Li, Appl. Catal. A, 2012, 443-444: 191–201. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2012.07.042
[29] A. Dandekar, M. A. Vannice, J. Catal., 1998, 178: 621–639. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1998.2190
[30] S. Natesakhawat, J. W. Lekse, J. P. Baltrus, P. R. Ohodnicki, B. H. Howard, X. Y. Deng, C. Matranga, ACS Catal., 2012, 2: 1667–1676. DOI:10.1021/cs300008g
[31] G. D. Wu, X. L. Wang, W. Wei, Y. H. Sun, Appl. Catal. A, 2010, 377: 107–113. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2010.01.023
[32] P. Gao, F. Li, H. J. Zhan, N. Zhao, F. K. Xiao, W. Wei, L. S. Zhong, H. Wang, Y. H. Sun, J. Catal., 2013, 298: 51–60. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2012.10.030
[33] M. Saito, T. Fujitani, M. Takeuchi, T. Watanabe, Appl. Catal. A, 1996, 138: 311–318. DOI:10.1016/0926-860X(95)00305-3
[34] W. X. Pan, R. Cao, D. L. Roberts, G. L. GriffIns, J. Catal., 1988, 114: 440–446. DOI:10.1016/0021-9517(88)90047-4
[35] H. J. Zhan, F. Li, P. Gao, N. Zhao, F. K. Xiao, W. Wei, L. S. Zhong, Y. H. Sun, J. Power Sources, 2014, 251: 113–121. DOI:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.037
[36] X. M. Guo, D. S. Mao, G. Z. Lu, S. Wang, G. S. Wu, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2011, 345: 60–68. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2011.05.019
[37] P. Gao, F. Li, N. Zhao, F. K. Xiao, W. Wei, L. S. Zhong, Y. H. Sun, Appl. Catal. A, 2013, 468: 442–452. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2013.09.026
[38] T. Witoon, T. Permsirivanich, W. Donphai, A. Jaree, M. Chareonpanich, Fuel Process. Technol., 2013, 116: 72–78. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.04.024
[39] L. Li, D. S. Mao, J. Yu, X. M. Guo, J. Power Sources, 2015, 279: 394–404. DOI:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.142
[40] Q. Sun, Y. L. Zhang, H. Y. Chen, J. F. Deng, D. Wu, S. Y. Chen, J. Catal., 1997, 167: 92–105. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1997.1554
[41] J. Toyir, P. R. de la Piscina, J. L. G. Fierro, N. Homs, Appl. Catal. B, 2001, 34: 255–266. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(01)00203-X
[42] J. Toyir, P. R. de la Piscina, J. L. G. Fierro, N. Homs, Appl. Catal. B, 2001, 29: 207–215. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(00)00205-8
[43] G. C. Chinchen, K. C. Waugh, J. Catal., 1986, 97: 280–283. DOI:10.1016/0021-9517(86)90063-1
[44] G. C. Wang, Y. Z. Zhao, Z. S. Cai, Y. M. Pan, X. Z. Zhao, Y. W. Li, Y. H. Sun, B. Zhong, Surf. Sci., 2000, 465: 51–58. DOI:10.1016/S0039-6028(00)00660-9