催化学报  2018, Vol. 39 Issue (4): 613-618   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Qizhao Wang
Tengjiao Niu
Lei Wang
Jingwei Huang
Houde She
NiFe layered double-hydroxide nanoparticles for efficiently enhancing performance of BiVO4 photoanode in photoelectrochemical water splitting
Qizhao Wang, Tengjiao Niu, Lei Wang, Jingwei Huang, Houde She     
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
* Corresponding author. Qizhao Wang, Fax: +86-931-7972677; E-mail: wangqizhao@163.com, qizhaosjtu@gmail.com
Foundation item: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21663027, 51262028, 21261021), the Science and Technology Support Project of Gansu Province (1504GKCA027), the Program for the Young Innovative Talents of Longyuan, the Program for Innovative Research Team (NWNULKQN-15-2) and the Undergraduate Academic Innovative Research Team of Northwest Normal University
Abstract: A bismuth vanadate (BiVO4) photoanode with a cocatalyst consisting of NiFe layered double-hydroxide (NiFe-LDH) nanoparticles was fabricated for photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting. NiFe-LDH nanoparticles, which can improve light-absorption capacities and facilitate efficient hole transfer to the surface, were deposited on the surface of the BiVO4 photoanode by a hydrothermal method. All the samples were characterized using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and diffuse-reflectance spectroscopy. Linear sweep voltammetry and current-time plots were used to investigate the PEC activity. The photocurrent response of NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 at 1.23 V vs the reversible hydrogen electrode was higher than those of Ni(OH)2/BiVO4, Fe(OH)2/BiVO4 and pure BiVO4 electrodes under visible-light illumination. NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 also gave a superior PEC hydrogen evolution performance. Furthermore, the stability of the NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 photoanode was excellent compared with that of the bare BiVO4 photoanode, and offers a novel method for solar-assisted water splitting.
© 2018, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: NiFe layered double-hydroxide nanoparticles    BiVO4 photoanode    Photoelectrochemical water splitting    Photoelectrocatalysis    
NiFe双氢纳米粒子有效提高BiVO4光阳极光电化学水分解性能
王其召, 牛腾娇, 王磊, 黄静伟, 佘厚德     
西北师范大学化学化工学院, 甘肃兰州 730070
摘要:近年来,太阳能驱动的光电化学水分解作为一种高效、环保、可持续的技术,已经引起了广泛的关注.为了更好地使用光电化学技术将太阳能转化为化学能,至关重要的是提高光电极材料的光吸收和光转化效率.BiVO4禁带宽度(Eg=2.4-2.5eV)小,具有很好的可见光响应能力,因此BiVO4光电极材料引起了广泛关注.但是,当单独BiVO4作为光电阳极材料时,电子-空穴对分离弱、载流子传输慢,从而使BiVO4不能很好地在光电化学水分解中发挥作用.为了缓解或解决此类限制性因素,本课题组通过水热法合成了NiFe双氢纳米粒子,并将其负载于BiVO4电极表面,光电催化分解水实验表明其产氢效率得到大幅度提高.同时制备了Ni(OH)2/BiVO4和Fe(OH)2/BiVO4电极并用于研究NiFe/BiVO4电极的反应机理.在上文基础上,本文采用电子扫描电镜(SEM)、高分辨投射电镜(HRTEM)、X射线衍射(XRD)、紫外可见漫反射(UV-Vis DRS)等表征手段和线性扫描伏安法(LSV)和电流时间(I-t)等对其光电化学活性进行了测试,研究了NiFe/BiVO4电极在发生水氧化时的反应机理. SEM结果表明,Ni(OH)2是以纳米片组成的纳米球负载于多孔BiVO4表面;而当Fe(OH)2负载于BiVO4表面时,BiVO4的纳米尺寸减小;NiFe-LDH纳米粒子负载于BiVO4表面时,可以明显看见BiVO4纳米颗粒表面包裹着一层更小的纳米粒子.这证明了Ni(OH)2,Fe(OH)2和NiFe-LDH纳米粒子均成功负载于BiVO4表面.这也得到HRTEM结果的确认.UV-Vis DRS结果表明NiFe-LDH纳米粒子能有效拓宽BiVO4的吸收边,从而增加对可见光的吸收,增加了对光的利用率. LSV测试结果表明,暗反应条件下Ni(OH)2/BiVO4比NiFe/BiVO4和Fe(OH)2/BiVO4电极的起始电位更低,说明Ni(OH)2有更好的传输电子性能;而在光照条件下,在同一电位时NiFe/BiVO4比Ni(OH)2/BiVO4和Fe(OH)2/BiVO4电极的光电流值更高.值得注意的是,此时Ni(OH)2/BiVO4比Fe(OH)2/BiVO4电极的光电流值低,这又说明Fe(OH)2比Ni(OH)2对光更敏感.因此当NiFe-LDH纳米粒子负载于BiVO4表面时,不仅提高了BiVO4光电极的光吸收效率,而且加速了载流子的传输从而抑制了光生电子-空穴的复合,使反应过程中的量子效率得到提高.
关键词NiFe双氢纳米粒子    BiVO4光阳极    光电化学水分解    光电催化    

In recent years, solar-driven photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting, which is an efficient, environmentally friendly, and sustainable technique, has attracted considerable attention [1, 2]. Improvements in the sunlight-absorption properties, conversion efficiencies, and catalytic activities of photoelectrode materials are crucial in the use of PEC for transforming solar energy into chemical energy [3, 4]. Various photoelectrode materials such as TiO2 [5, 6], WO3 [7, 8], and α-Fe2O3 [9, 10] have been widely studied and used for efficient production of hydrogen at the photocathodes of PEC cells. The use of BiVO4 in PEC water splitting is increasing because of its small bandgap (Eg = 2.4–2.5 eV), which enables significant visible-light absorption, and its high valence band, which provides an overpotential that is sufficient for water oxidation [11-13]. However, weak electron–hole separation and a poor transport yield restrict the overall quantum efficiency in PEC processes when pure BiVO4 is used as the photoanode [14].

To address these limitations, diverse strategies for modification of BiVO4, such as doping [15, 16], addition of a cocatalyst [17, 18], and construction of heterojunction structures [19, 20] have been developed to improve the PEC properties of BiVO4 photoanodes. Transition-metal (oxy)hydroxides such as Ni(OH)2 [21], FeOOH [22], and NiFe layered double-hydroxide (NiFe-LDH) materials [23, 24] have been widely explored for use in electrochemical oxygen evolution reactions (OERs). An operando Mössbauer spectroscopic study showed that Fe4+ was formed in the electrochemical OER process and the active sites were Fe4+ species generated within an Fe-doped NiOOH lattice [25], suggesting that Fe plays a critical role. In situ surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy showed that NiOO- generated from Ni(Fe)OOH acted as an electrochemical OER precursor [26]. It is therefore believed that doping with Fe or Ni is an effective method for enhancing PEC activity.

In this work, a BiVO4 film was prepared by electrochemical deposition, and used as a precursor in hydrothermal production of Ni(OH)2/BiVO4, Fe(OH)2/BiVO4, and NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 films [27]. The NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 composite gave the best PEC performance. The photocurrent response of NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 in the high-potential region (> 0.5 V vs Ag/AgCl) was better than that of pure BiVO4. Hydrogen production of 1260 μmol was achieved in 3 h under visible-light illumination; this is 2.5 times that produced with the pristine BiVO4 photoanode. Ni can facilitate efficient hole transfer to the surface and Fe increases the light-absorption capacity. NiFe-LDH nanoparticles are therefore not only an excellent electrochemical catalyst, but also an excellent PEC catalyst, and these nanoparticles have potential applications in solar water splitting.

Scheme 1 shows a schematic diagram of the synthesis of the pure BiVO4, Ni(OH)2/BiVO4, Fe(OH)2/BiVO4, and NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 photoanodes. A BiVO4 electrode was synthesized by a previously reported method [28]. In short, after electrodeposition of a BiOI film, vanadium was added, followed by calcination; excess V2O5 was removed by soaking, to give pure BiVO4. The composite photoanodes were prepared by a traditional hydrothermal method. An aqueous solution (30 mL) containing Ni(NO3)2·6H2O (0.1047 g), Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (0.1454 g), and urea (0.2162 g) was transferred to a 50-mL Teflon-lined autoclave in which BiVO4 was placed with the BiVO4 side facing the wall of the autoclave; the mixture was heated at 120 ℃ for 6 h. The formed composite was thoroughly rinsed with purified water and dried at room temperature before use.

Scheme 1. Synthesis schematic diagram of pure BiVO4, Ni(OH)2/BiVO4, Fe(OH)2/BiVO4 and NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 photoanodes.

The morphologies of the photoelectrodes were examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM); the images are shown in Fig. 1. The surface of the bare BiVO4 photoanode consisted of nanoparticles of uniform size. Ni was loaded on the BiVO4 surface in the form of nanospheres. After Fe deposition, the BiVO4 particle size decreased, and NiFe-LDH nanoparticles were wrapped around the BiVO4 particle surfaces. Fig. 1(e) shows that the NiFe-LDH nanoparticles were deposited on the BiVO4 surface. The interplanar distances were estimated to be about 0.363 and 0.318 nm, corresponding to the (511) and (421) planes, respectively, of the NiFe-LDH nanoparticles. Fig. S1 confirms that a composite film was prepared.

Fig. 1. (a–d) SEM mapping of BiVO4, Ni(OH)2/BiVO4, Fe(OH)2/BiVO4 and NiFe-LDH/BiVO4; (e) HRTEM images of NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 photoanode.

The crystallographic structure of all the prepared photocatalysts were determined using X-ray diffraction (XRD; Fig. 2). The results confirm that all the BiVO4 photoanodes have a single monoclinic scheelite structure. However, diffraction peaks corresponding to Ni(OH)2, Fe(OH)2, and NiFe-LDH nanoparticles were not observed. This may be because the contents of Ni(OH)2, Fe(OH)2, and NiFe-LDH nanoparticles were low, possibly below the XRD detection limit.

Fig. 2. XRD patterns of the BiVO4, Ni(OH)2/BiVO4, Fe(OH)2/BiVO4 and NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 photoanodes.

Ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy was used to determine the bandgap values; the spectra are shown in Fig. 3. The absorption for the NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 photoanode was slightly higher than that for the BiVO4 photoanode. This can be attributed to a larger absorption efficiency and narrower bandgap in the case of the NiFe-LDH nanoparticles. Fig. S2 shows the photoluminescence (PL) emission spectra of the samples at an excitation wavelength of 350 nm. The PL intensity for the NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 film was lower than that for the pure BiVO4 film, showing that the electrons and holes in the NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 film were easily separated.

Fig. 3. UV-Vis diffused reflectance spectra of BiVO4 and NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 (a) and the energy gap of BiVO4 and NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 (b).

Linear current-voltage curves for the BiVO4, Ni(OH)2/BiVO4, Fe(OH)2/BiVO4, and NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 photoanodes were recorded (Fig. 4). The photocurrent densities of the Ni(OH)2/BiVO4 and Fe(OH)2/BiVO4 films were 0.81 and 1.98 mA, respectively, at 0.6 V (vs Ag/AgCl). The BiVO4 film coated with NiFe-LDH nanoparticles gave the highest photocurrent density, i.e., 2.49 mA, at 0.6 V (vs Ag/AgCl), and its photoactivity was 217% higher than that of the bare BiVO4 film. Fig. 4(b) shows that the onset potentials of the BiVO4 and NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 photoanodes in water oxidation were 1.2 and 0.8 V (vs Ag/AgCl), respectively. The clear cathodic shift in its onset potential and overpotential in water oxidation compared with those for pure BiVO4 indicate that the NiFe-LDH nanoparticles had a catalytic effect. Photogenerated holes accumulate on the BiVO4 photoanode surface, resulting in significant surface charge recombination. Loading with NiFe-LDH nanoparticles could reduce the amount of accumulated holes, and this would prevent recombination during water oxidation; this is supported by the much less pronounced photocurrent transients (Fig. S3).

Fig. 4. Linear current-voltage curves of BiVO4, Ni(OH)2/BiVO4, Fe(OH)2/BiVO4 and NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 photoanode with visible light irradiation (a), without illumination (b), respectively.

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was used to evaluate the charge-transfer kinetics at the semiconductor-electrolyte interface (Fig. 5). The Nyquist plots for the BiVO4 and NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 electrodes were consistent with the linear sweep voltammetry results, with and without light irradiation. The semicircle for NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 was smaller than that for the BiVO4 electrode under both dark and illuminated conditions. This indicates that NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 gave highly efficient electron and hole transport. Further analysis to clarify the mechanism of the PEC water-splitting reaction was performed by obtaining Motty-Schottky curves, shown in Fig. S4. Fitting of the linear parts of the plots showed that the carrier density in the BiVO4 electrode was increased by surface modification with NiFe-LDH nanoparticles, and superior PEC hydrogen activity was achieved as a result of effective separation and transfer of charge carriers.

Fig. 5. Nyquist plots of EIS measurements on the pure BiVO4 and NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 photoanodes (a) in the dark at the open circuit potential in 0.5 mol/L Na2SO4; (b) Under the visible light irradiation at the open circuit potential.

Fig. 6 shows that hydrogen generation with the NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 photoanode under visible-light illumination for 3 h was higher than that with the pure BiVO4 electrode. The reactor was filled with flowing argon gas for 30 min to exclude air from the system. The PEC reaction was then started with the assistance of light from a light-emitting diode lamp (CEL-LED100). A 1-mL injector was used to extract the evolved hydrogen for analysis with a gas chromatography (GC-9560) online system at set intervals of 30 min during light irradiation. Fig. 6 shows that the NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 photoanode gave an excellent PEC water-splitting performance. Hydrogen production was 1260 μmol in 3 h under light illumination; this is 2.5 times that produced with the pristine BiVO4 photoanode. Furthermore, the NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 photoanode showed excellent stability compared with the bare BiVO4 photoanode. NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 therefore has potential applications in the development of new solar water-splitting techniques.

Fig. 6. Time course of produced H2 at 1.23 V vs. RHE in 0.5 mol/L Na2SO4 by a self-made H-type photo-reactor (a) and amperometric I-t curves for 3 h PEC hydrogen production (b).

A possible mechanism for the reaction at the NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 photoelectrode is proposed on the basis of the above results and previously reported results (Scheme 2). First, the NiFe-LDH nanoparticles promote visible-light absorption by NiFe/BiVO4. The NiFe-LDH nanoparticles tend to shift to the positive potential region and generate positive charges, and then accept electrons from the semiconductor to revert to their original state. This is similar to cocatalysis with Ag and Bi [29, 30]. The transfer of holes from the semiconductor to the metal suppresses recombination of the photogenerated electrons and holes, and this increases the lifetimes of the carriers.

Scheme 2. The possible PEC hydrogen generation mechanism of NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 photoanode at 1.23 V vs. RHE in 0.5 mol/L Na2SO4 solution under visible light irradiation.

In summary, a high-performance BiVO4 photoanode with a NiFe-LDH nanoparticle cocatalyst was developed for PEC water splitting. The photocurrent density and hydrogen production achieved with the optimized NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 were respectively approximately 217% and 2.5 times the values achieved with pristine BiVO4. The NiFe-LDH nanoparticles facilitate efficient hole transfer to the surface and enhance the light-absorption capacity. The optimized NiFe-LDH/BiVO4 photoanode also showed excellent stability in PEC water splitting.

References
[1] Y. Ma, X. L. Wang, Y. S. Jia, X. Chen, H. X. Han, C. Li, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114: 9987–10043. DOI:10.1021/cr500008u
[2] M. G. Walter, E. L. Warren, J. R. McKone, S. W. Boettcher, Q. Mi, E. A. Santori, N. S. Lewis, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110: 6446–6473. DOI:10.1021/cr1002326
[3] X. B. Chen, L. Liu, P. Y. Yu, S. S. Mao, Science, 2011, 331: 746–750. DOI:10.1126/science.1200448
[4] D. Wang, X. T. Zhang, P. P. Sun, S. Lu, L. L. Wang, Y. A. Wei, Y. C. Liu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39: 16212–16219. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.01.164
[5] R. Sánchez-Tovar, R. M. Fernández-Domene, A. Mar-tínez-Sánchez, E. BlascoTamarit, J. García-Antón, J. Catal., 2015, 330: 434–441. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2015.08.002
[6] J. Qiu, G. T. Zeng, M. Y. Ge, S. Arab, M. Mecklenburg, B. Y. Hou, C. F. Shen, A. V. Benderskii, S. B. Cronin, J. Catal., 2016, 337: 133–137. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2016.02.002
[7] Y. Hou, F. Zuo, A. P. Dagg, J. K. Liu, P. Y. Feng, Adv. Mater., 2014, 26: 5043–5049. DOI:10.1002/adma.201401032
[8] J. W. Huang, Y. Ding, X. Luo, Y. Y. Feng, J. Catal., 2016, 333: 200–206. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2015.11.003
[9] F. Le Formal, S. R. Pendlebury, M. Cornuz, S. D. Tilley, M. Gratzel, J. R. Durrant, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136: 2564–2574. DOI:10.1021/ja412058x
[10] L. M. He, L. Q. Jing, Y. B. Luan, L. Wang, H. G. Fu, ACS Catal., 2014, 4: 990–998. DOI:10.1021/cs401122e
[11] H. Du, Y. N. Liu, C. C. Shen, A. W. Xu, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 1295–1306. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62866-3
[12] L. W. Zhang, E. Reisner, J. J. Baumberg, Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, 7: 1402–1408. DOI:10.1039/C3EE44031A
[13] Q. Z. Wang, J. J. He, Y. B. Shi, S. L. Zhang, T. J. Niu, H. D. She, Y. P. Bi, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 326: 411–418. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.171
[14] J. Resasco, H. Zhang, N. Kornienko, N. Becknell, H. Lee, J. H. Guo, A. L. Briseno, P. D. Yang, ACS Cent. Sci., 2016, 2: 80–88. DOI:10.1021/acscentsci.5b00402
[15] X. F. Zhang, X. Quan, S. Chen, Y. B. Zhang, J. Hazard. Mater., 2010, 177: 914–917. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.01.003
[16] M. T. Li, L. Zhao, L. J. Guo, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35: 7127–7133. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.026
[17] S. L. Xie, W. J. Wei, S. C. Huang, M. Y. Li, P. P. Fang, X. H. Lu, Y. X. Tong, J. Power Sources, 2015: 9–15.
[18] F. Lin, D. E. Wang, Z. X. Jiang, Y. Ma, J. Li, R. G. Li, C. Li, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5: 6400–6406. DOI:10.1039/C1EE02880D
[19] Q. Z. Wang, J. J. He, Y. B. Shi, S. L. Zhang, T. J. Niu, H. D. She, Y. P. Bi, Z. Q. Lei, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 214: 158–167. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.05.044
[20] Y. J. Sun, X. Xiao, X. A. Dong, F. Dong, W. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 217–226. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62753-0
[21] M. R. Gao, W. C. Sheng, Z. B. Zhuang, Q. R. Fang, S. Gu, J. Jiang, Y. S. Yan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136: 7077–7084. DOI:10.1021/ja502128j
[22] M. R Tang, Q. F. Ge, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 1621–1628. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62760-8
[23] M. Gong, Y. G. Li, H. L. Wang, Y. Y. Liang, J. Z. Wu, J. Zhou, J. G. Wang, T. Regier, F. Wei, H. J. Dai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135: 8452–8455. DOI:10.1021/ja4027715
[24] Z. Y. Lu, W. W. Xu, W. Zhu, Q. Yang, X. D. Lei, J. F. Liu, Y. P. Li, X. M. Sun, X. Duan, Chem.Commun., 2014, 50: 6479–6482. DOI:10.1039/C4CC01625D
[25] J. Y. C. Chen, L. N. Dang, H. F. Liang, W. L. Bi, J. B. Gerken, S. Jin, E. E. Alp, S. S. Stahl, J. Am.Chem. Soc., 2015, 137: 15090–15093. DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b10699
[26] B. J. Trzesniewski, O. Diaz-Morales, D. A. Vermaas, A. Longo, W. Bras, M. T. M. Koper, W. A. Smith, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137: 15112–15121. DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b06814
[27] J. W. Huang, G.W. Hu, Y. Ding, M. C. Pang, B. C. Ma, J. Catal., 2016, 340: 261–269. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2016.05.007
[28] X. X. Chang, T. Wang, P. Zhang, J. J. Zhang, A. Li, J. L. Gong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137: 8356–8359. DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b04186
[29] H. F. Cheng, B. B. Huang, P. Wang, Z. Y. Wang, Z. Z. Lou, J. P. Wang, X. Y. Qin, X. Y. Zhang, Y. Dai, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47: 7054–7056. DOI:10.1039/c1cc11525a
[30] Z. L. Ni, W. D. Zhang, G. M. Jiang, X. P. Wang, Z. Z. Lu, Y. J. Sun, X. W. Li, Y. X. Zhang, F. Dong, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 1174–1183. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62849-3