催化学报  2018, Vol. 39 Issue (4): 619-629   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Peng Chen
Fan Dong
Maoxi Ran
Jiarui Li
Synergistic photo-thermal catalytic NO purification of MnOx/g-C3N4: Enhanced performance and reaction mechanism
Peng Chen, Fan Dong, Maoxi Ran, Jiarui Li     
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Catalysis and New Environmental Materials, College of Environment and Resources, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China
* Corresponding author. Fan Dong, Tel/Fax: +86-23-62769785; E-mail: dfctbu@126.com
Foundation item: This work was supported by the National Key R & D Plan (2016YFC02047), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51478070, 21501016, 21777011), the Innovative Research Team of Chongqing (CXTDG201602014), and the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (cstc2017jcyjBX0052)
Abstract: Both MnOx and g-C3N4 have been proved to be active in the catalytic oxidation of NO, and their individual mechanisms for catalytic NO conversion have also been investigated. However, the mechanism of photo-thermal catalysis of the MnOx/g-C3N4composite remains unresolved. In this paper, MnOx/g-C3N4 catalysts with different molar ratios were synthesized by the precipitation approach at room temperature. The as-prepared catalysts exhibit excellent synergistic photo-thermal catalytic performance towards the purification of NO in air. The MnOx/g-C3N4 catalysts contain MnOx with different valence states on the surface of g-C3N4. The thermal catalytic reaction for NO oxidation on MnOx and the photo-thermal catalytic reaction on 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 were investigated by in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (in situ DRIFTS). The results show that light exerted a weak effect on NO oxidation over MnOx, and it exerted a positive synergistic effect on NO conversion over 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4. A synergistic photo-thermal catalytic cycle of NO oxidation on MnOx/g-C3N4 is proposed. Specifically, photo-generated electrons (e-) are transferred to MnOx and participate in the synergistic photo-thermal reduction cycle (Mn4+→Mn3+→Mn2+). The reverse cycle (Mn2+→Mn3+→Mn4+) can regenerate the active oxygen vacancy sites and inject electrons into the g-C3N4 hole (h+). The active oxygen (O-) was generated in the redox cycles among manganese species (Mn4+/Mn3+/Mn2+) and could oxidize the intermediates (NOH and N2O2-) to final products (NO2- and NO3-). This paper can provide insightful guidance for the development of better catalysts for NOx purification.
© 2018, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: MnOx    g-C3N4    Synergistic catalysis    Photo-thermal    In situ DRIFTS    NO oxidation    
MnOx/g-C3N4光热协同催化净化NO的性能增强和反应机理
陈鹏, 董帆, 冉茂希, 李佳芮     
重庆工商大学环境与资源学院, 重庆市催化与环境新材料重点实验室, 重庆 400067
摘要:许多研究表明,MnOx和g-C3N4均有催化氧化NO的活性,并且探索了它们各自的转化机理.然而,MnOx/g-C3N4复合材料的光热催化机理仍然是一个未解决的问题.我们通过室温沉淀法直接合成不同摩尔比的MnOx/g-C3N4,并发现其表现出良好的光热协同催化氧化NO的性能.MnOx/g-C3N4催化剂在g-C3N4表面含有不同价态的MnOx.通过原位红外光谱在60℃下研究了紫外-可见光诱导的MnOx热催化NO的机理以及MnOx/g-C3N4光热协同催化NO的机理.结果表明,光照对MnOx热催化NO的过程几乎没有影响,但对MnOx/g-C3N4光热协同催化NO产生积极作用并且形成重要的催化循环机制.具体过程是光生电子(e-)转移到MnOx上参与光热协同的还原循环(Mn4+→Mn3+→Mn2+),且低价Mn离子易给出电子(e-)与光生空穴(h+)相结合而诱导逆向的循环(Mn2+→Mn3+→Mn4+),使活性氧空位再生.通过MnOx(Mn4+/Mn3+/Mn2+)变价而产生的活性氧(O-)可将中间产物(NOH和N2O2-)氧化为终产物(NO2-和NO3-).这将为开发更好的净化NOx的催化剂提供重要的指导意义. XRD表征结果表明,MnOx/g-C3N4复合催化剂的结晶度较低.TEM和XPS表征结果表明,g-C3N4表面含有多种低结晶度的MnOx,主要含有MnO,MnO2和Mn2O3.此外,通过对比MnOx和1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4催化净化NO的XPS结果,发现反应后的MnOx含有大量Mn-Nitrate且Mn3+和Mn4+大幅度减少;同时,反应前后1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4的Mn2+,Mn3+和Mn4+的含量变化微弱.BET-BJH测试结果显示,MnOx/g-C3N4复合催化剂的比表面积和孔容均高于纯g-C3N4.UV-VisDRS测试结果显示,MnOx/g-C3N4复合催化剂显示了良好的可见光吸收能力.紫外-可见光催化去除NO的测试结果表明,1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4(44%)的光催化活性明显高于MnOx(28%)和g-C3N4(36%).ESR测试结果表明,参与反应的主要活性物种为·O2-自由基.EPR测试结果表明,1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4的氧空位明显多于MnOx,丰富的活性氧空位更有利于电子的迁移且促进Mnn+n=2,3和4)的变价而诱导O2分子形成活性氧(O-).以上结果清晰地表明1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4表现出不同的理化特性. 可见光催化氧化NO的原位红外光谱表明,光照前后MnOx催化氧化NO的过程没有明显的变化,表明其属于典型的热催化过程,综合上述表征结果发现MnOx的氧缺陷是Mnn+n=3和4)变价的活性位点,可诱导O2产生活性氧催化氧化NO为硝酸盐吸附在MnOx上;光照前后1:5MnOx/g-C3N4催化氧化NO的过程有明显不同,光照前主要表现为g-C3N4表面MnOx的热催化过程,而光照后1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4为光热协同催化NO的过程.具体过程是g-C3N4的光生电子(e-)转移到MnOx上参与光热协同的还原循环(Mn4+→Mn3+→Mn2+),且低价Mn离子易给出电子(e-)与光生空穴(h+)相结合而诱导逆向的循环(Mn2+→Mn3+→Mn4+)使活性氧空位再生.通过MnOx(Mn4+/Mn3+/Mn2+)变价而产生的活性氧(O-)可将中间产物(NOH和N2O2-)氧化为终产物(NO2-和NO3-).
关键词MnOx    g-C3N4    协同催化    光热协同    原位红外光谱    NO氧化    

1 Introduction

NOx (NO and NO2) contribute to serious environmental problems, such as acid rain, ozone depletion, and photochemical smog [1-4]. Efficient NOx removal technology is urgently needed owing to the increased emission from transport sectors and power plants. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) has been widely adopted to eliminate NOx pollution [5, 6]. Normally, the SCR catalysts exhibit excellent activity for removal of high-concentration NO (200–2000 ppm) at high temperatures (> 200 ℃) [7]. Along with the report by Kapteijn et al. describing NOx SCR by MnOx in 1994, research interest in the development of MnOx-driven SCR has increased. Over the last few decades, MnOx has been widely applied to NO removal. Kang et al. [8] prepared MnOx catalyst by a precipitation technique and found that the MnOx catalyst exhibited excellent activity for SCR of NOx with NH3 at low temperatures. Unfortunately, the SCR activity for NOx removal was still unsatisfactory at lower temperatures (< 100 ℃). Thus, developing advanced techniques for efficient NOx removal at lower temperature has become a research challenge.

Photocatalysis has gained considerable attention for solar-energy utilization and environmental remediation in view of mild reaction conditions [9, 10]. Many photocatalysts were developed to meet the requirement of various applications, e.g., photocatalytic hydrogen evolution, photodegradation of RhB solutions, and NOx removal [11-13]. In particular, as a metal-free layered conjugated semiconductor, g-C3N4 has become a new subject of research focus in the area of environmental remediation due to its appealing electronic structure, physico-chemical stability, and natural abundance [14-19].

Dong et al. [17] immobilized polymeric g-C3N4 on structured ceramic foam for efficient photocatalytic air purification and proposed the corresponding reaction mechanism of photocatalytic NO oxidation. Yu et al. [20] revealed the mechanism of photocatalytic oxidation of NO over g-C3N4-based carbon nanofibers at room temperature. Recently, Cui et al. [18] steered the interlayer energy barrier and charge flow via bi-oriented transportation channels in g-C3N4 and revealed the reaction mechanism by a combined density functional theory (DFT) calculation with DRIFTS.

Although NO purification on MnOx and g-C3N4 has been extensively investigated, combining them to construct a photo-thermal catalyst has not been reported to the best of our knowledge. Furthermore, the photo-thermal catalytic mechanism of NO oxidation remains unresolved. In the work reported here, MnOx/g-C3N4 hybrids were fabricated via precipitation at room temperature. MnOx/g-C3N4 was applied to remove NO with a low concentration of 500 ppb in air under ultraviolet-visible-light (UV-Vis) irradiation. The mechanisms of NO adsorption and NO catalytic oxidation over MnOx and 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 at 60 ℃ were proposed through a systematic in situ DRIFTS investigation. Based on the experimental results, a significant synergistic photo-thermal catalytic cycle was proposed for MnOx/g-C3N4 hybrids. The NO could first be adsorbed on the surface of the hybrid to form some intermediates (NOH and N2O2-), and then reacted with active oxygen (O-) generated in the redox cycles between manganese species (Mn4+/Mn3+/Mn2+) to oxidize intermediates to NO3- or NO2-. Specifically, during the synergistic photo-thermal reduction cycle (Mn4+→Mn3+→Mn2+), photo-generated electrons (e-) are transferred to MnOx and captured by surface-adsorbed oxygen to generate active oxygen (O-). Furthermore, the reverse cycle (Mn2+ →Mn3+→Mn4+) can regenerate the active oxygen vacancy sites and inject electrons into the g-C3N4 hole (h+). Thus, there will be abundant O- generated to participate in NO oxidation and enhance the synergistic photo-thermal catalytic performance of MnOx/g-C3N4 catalysts for NO removal.

2 Experimental
2.1 Materials and synthesis

All chemicals employed were of analytical grade and were used without further treatment. First, 10 g of thiourea was placed into a crucible and heated at 550 ℃ for 2 h to obtain g-C3N4. Second, the MnOx/g-C3N4 samples were synthesized via room-temperature precipitation. In the typical procedure, 30 mL of distilled water and 30 mL of ethanol was added into a 100-mL beaker and stirred using a magnetic stirrer. A certain amount of g-C3N4 was then added into above mixed solution and stirred for 30 min. According to the molar ratios (1:3, 1:5, and 1:10) of MnOx/g-C3N4, a certain amount of KMnO4 was also added into a beaker and stirred using a magnetic stirrer until it was completely dissolved. Next, 0.0378 g of NaBH4 was added into the ethanol solution. Finally, the KMnO4 solution was added dropwise into above mixed solution and stirred for another 24 h. Then, after precipitation for 30 min, the resulting samples were obtained by centrifugation, and washed with water and ethanol four times, and dried at 60 ℃ in a vacuum drying oven. The obtained samples were labeled as 1:3 MnOx/g-C3N4, 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4, and 1:10 of MnOx/g-C3N4, respectively.

2.2 Materials characterization

The crystal phases of the samples were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) with Cu Kα radiation (Model D/max RA, Rigaku Corp., Japan). UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra (UV-Vis DRS) were obtained for the dry-pressed disk samples using a scanning UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-Vis DRS, UV-2450, Shimadzu Corp., Japan) equipped with an integrating sphere assembly to investigate the optical properties of the samples. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms were obtained on a nitrogen adsorption apparatus (ASAP 2020, USA) with all samples degassed at 110 ℃ for 4 h before measurements. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) with Al Kα X-ray radiation (hv = 1486.6 eV) operated at 150 W (Thermo ESCALAB 250, USA) was used to investigate the surface properties. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements were carried out on a spectrometer (Bruker ESP 500, USA) and was used to study the electronic properties. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2010, JEOL Corp., Japan) was used to characterize the morphology and structure.

2.3 Evaluation of photocatalytic activity

Gas-phase catalytic performance was evaluated through the removal ratio of a low concentration of NO with ppb levels (500 ppb) in a continuous-flow reactor (rectangular reactor, 30 cm × 15 cm × 10 cm). 0.1 g samples were taken in two small beakers, into each of which 20 mL of distilled water was added, and then the resulting solution was transferred to two glass dishes (12.0 cm in diameter) after ultrasonic dispersion for 5 min, followed by drying at 60 ℃ in advance of catalytic activity tests. A 150-W commercial tungsten halogen lamp (average light intensity 0.16 W/cm2) was vertically placed outside and above the reactor, and then turned on when adsorption-desorption equilibrium was achieved. A reactor outlet was connected to the NOx analyzer (Thermo Scientific, 42i-TL). An opening light source was applied after the NO concentration was stable at intervals of 1 min and recorded with a NOx analyzer. The removal ratio (η) of NO was calculated as η = (1 -C/C0) × 100%, where C and C0 are the concentrations of NO in the outlet stream and feeding stream, respectively.

2.4 In situ DRIFTS study of visible-light-photocatalytic-NO-oxidation process

The in situ DRIFTS measurements were conducted using a TENSOR Ⅱ FTIR spectrometer (Bruker Corp.) equipped with an in situ diffuse reflectance cell (Harrick) and a high-temperature reaction chamber (HVC), as shown in Scheme 1. The reaction chamber was equipped with three gas ports and two coolant ports. High-purity He, high-purity O2, and 100 ppm of NO (in He) mixtures could be fed into the reaction system, and a three-way ball valve was used to switch between the target gas (NO) and the purge gas (He). The total gas-flow rate was 100 mL/min, and the concentration of NO was adjusted to 50 ppm by dilution with O2. The chamber was enclosed with a dome having three windows, two for IR light entrance and detection, and one for illuminating the photocatalyst. The observation window was made of UV quartz, and the other two windows were made of ZnSe. A Xe lamp (MVL-210, Japan) was used as the irradiation light source. In this work, prepared samples were pretreated for 20 min at 110 ℃ before measurements. In addition, the temperature was kept at 60 ℃ throughout the measurements.

Scheme 1. Reaction system designed for in situ IR signal recording.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Crystal structure

As revealed by the XRD patterns in Fig. 1(a) and (b), the crystallinity of all the MnOx/g-C3N4 samples are lower than that of the pristine g-C3N4. Two characteristic diffraction peaks, at 13.1° for the (100) plane and at 27.4° for the (002) plane of g-C3N4, can be observed. The former arises from the in-plane structural repeating motifs of the aromatic systems, and the latter originates from the interlayered graphite-like structure [21, 22]. The diffraction peaks of MnOx appearing in Fig. 1(b) are weak and broad, which can be ascribed to the low crystallinity of MnOx in the hybrids.

Fig. 1. XRD spectra for the samples (a, b) and TEM for 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 (c, d); Field emission scanning electron microscopy energy dispersive X-ray (FESEM-EDX) elemental mapping of 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 (e, f, g, h).

For 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 sample, there are several characteristic lattice fringes, as shown in Fig. 1(c). These lattice fringes may be assigned to different kinds of MnOx with different valence states, corresponding to the results of the Mn 2p spectrum in Fig. 2(c). The lattice-fringe spacings of 0.127, 0.157, and 0.246 nm correspond to the (321), (151), and (021) planes of MnO (PDF #04-0326), respectively. The lattice-fringe spacings of 0.186 and 0.222 nm are assigned to the (024) and (113) planes for Mn2O3 (PDF #33-0900), respectively. The lattice-fringe spacings of 0.121, 0.143, and 0.239 nm belong to the (332), (002), and (211) planes for MnO2 (PDF #44-0141), respectively. More importantly, two characteristic diffraction peaks of MnO2 at 37.5° for the (211) plane and 65.1° for the (002) plane (PDF #44-0141) can be noticeably observed in Fig. 1(b). However, the diffraction peak of Mn2O3 or MnO cannot be clearly found in Fig. 1(b), which suggests that the concentration of MnO2 in the hybrids is higher than that of Mn2O3 or MnO, corresponding to the concentration of Mn4+ surpassing that of Mn3+ or Mn2+ for fresh 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 in Fig. 3(b). Furthermore, C, N, Mn, and O signals can be detected in the element mapping of 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 (Fig. 1(e)(h)), indicating the uniform dispersion of Mn and O elements across the catalyst.

Fig. 2. C 1s (a) and N 1s (b) XPS spectra for g-C3N4 and 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4; Mn 2p XPS spectra for fresh and used MnOx and 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 (c); O 1s XPS spectra for MnOx and 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 (d).
Fig. 3. Percentage of core electron spectra for fresh and used MnOx (a) and 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 (b).
3.2 Surface species analysis

The chemical structure and composition of samples were examined by XPS measurements. In XPS survey spectra (Fig. 2(a)(d)), C 1s, N 1s, K 2p, Mn 2p, and O 1s can be observed for 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4. Fig. 2(a) suggested that the binding energies of C 1s at 284.6 and 288.1 eV can be ascribed to the sp2 C–C bonds and sp2-bonded carbon in the N-containing aromatic rings (N–C=N), respectively [23, 24]. Conspicuously, for 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4, there are another two binding energies of C 1s centered at 292.7 and 295.5 eV, corresponding to the orbital of K 2p. The N 1s spectra in Fig. 2(b) reveal that the main peak centered at 398.8 eV originates from the sp2-bonded N involved in the triazine rings (C–N=C), and the weak peak located at 400.4 eV can be ascribed to the tertiary nitrogen N–(C)3 groups in both g-C3N4 and 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 [24, 25]. The N–C=N, N–(C)3, and C–N=C groups constitute the basic substructure units and construct the heptazine heterocyclic ring (C6N7) units of g-C3N4 polymers.

As shown in Fig. 2(c), the Mn 2p spectra exhibit two peaks, 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 (resulting from the spin-orbit splitting), located at 642.2 and 653.9 eV, respectively. For Mn 2p3/2, the peak fitting was carried out [4, 25]. For fresh (or used) MnOx, Mn 2p3/2 can be deconvoluted into Mn3+ and Mn4+ with the characteristic binding energy at 641.5 (641.3) and 643.0 eV (642.6 eV), respectively. However, for the used MnOx, the Mn-nitrate species appears with the binding energy at 644.6 eV, and can be attributed to the adsorption of NO oxidation. However, Mn 2p3/2 can be deconvoluted into Mn2+, Mn3+, and Mn4+ for fresh (or used) 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4, with the characteristic binding energy at 640.5 (640.7), 641.7 (641.8) and 643.2 eV (643.1), respectively [4, 26-28], which indicates that the introduction of g-C3N4 could affect the formation of various valence states of Mn in MnOx via precipitation.

In the high-resolution O 1s XPS spectra, MnOx and 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 can be fitted to the two groups as shown in Fig. 2(d). The lattice oxygen O22- (denoted Oβ) is located in the range 529.8–530.1 eV. The peaks at 531.0–531.3eV can be assigned to surface-adsorbed oxygen (denoted Oα), such as O2- and O- due to defect-oxide or hydroxyl-like groups [4, 29-31]. Oα was often considered beneficial for NO oxidation to NO2 due to its higher mobility than Oβ [4, 29], which correctly corresponds to the detected signal intensity of the electron-deficient surface oxygen anion O- in EPR spectra (Fig. 4(b)).

Fig. 4. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm (a) and pore-size distributions (b) of the MnOx/g-C3N4 samples.

Additionally, the elemental composition for fresh and used samples are compared and listed in Fig. 3(a) and (b). The experimental results imply that the concentration of Mn4+ surpasses that of Mn3+ for the fresh MnOx and 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 samples. Moreover, the concentration of Mn3+and Mn4+ decreased, while the concentrations of the Mn-Nitrate increased after reaction for used MnOx, as shown in Fig. 3(a). Fig. 3(b) shows that the concentration of Mn3+ decreased, while the concentrations of Mn2+ and Mn4+ increased after the reaction for used 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4. These results correspond with NO oxidation reactions over MnOx and 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4, and constitute favorable evidence for the elucidation of the photo-thermal catalytic reaction (PTCR) mechanism.

3.3 Surface area and pore structure

The specific surface area of a catalyst is another important parameter for photocatalysis. The morphological properties of the as-obtained catalysts are determined by N2 physisorption, and the parameters are summarized in Table 1. In contrast to the pristine g-C3N4, both the specific surface areas and pore volumes of MnOx/g-C3N4 conspicuously increased, while the average size decreased. These results may suggest that the excellent pollutant adsorption capacity of MnOx/g-C3N4 can be ascribed to the introduction of MnOx. In addition, the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms are typical type-Ⅳ isotherms with a hysteresis loop at p/p0=0.6–1.0 [32], which indicates the formation of mesoporous structure, as illustrated in Fig. 4(a). Moreover, Fig. 4(b) shows that the pore size of 1:3 MnOx/g-C3N4 and 1:10 MnOx/g-C3N4 changes in the range 20–60 nm. In addition, the peak pore size of 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 disappeared in the range 3–4 nm, which can be attributed to the fact that MnOx particles are located in the porous structure of g-C3N4.

Table 1
Summary of the specific surface areas and pore parameters of the as-prepared samples.
3.4 Optical and electronic properties

UV-Vis DRS is carried out to investigate the optical properties. As presented in Fig. 5(a), compared to g-C3N4, the MnOx/g-C3N4 shows more intensive absorption over the entire range of wavelengths. This is because the MnOx possesses strong absorption in the UV-Vis light region, which contributes to the very high light-harvesting efficiency of MnOx/g-C3N4 hybrid.

Fig. 5. UV-Vis spectra for MnOx/g-C3N4 samples(a) and room-temperature solid-state EPR spectra of MnOx and 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 (b).

The electronic properties of MnOx and 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 were examined by solid-state electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) at room temperature. The signal intensity of the electron-deficient surface oxygen anion O- (g=2.036) can be detected in EPR spectra (Fig. 5(b)) [33]. For MnOx, the EPR signal intensity of O- barely changes in the dark or under visible light irradiation. This result suggests that light irradiation does not affect the electronic property of MnOx and cannot accelerate the charge transportation. Importantly, for the 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 sample, the EPR signal intensity of O- is enhanced both in the dark and under visible light irradiation, indicating that the combination MnOx and g-C3N4 could widen the band distribution, boosting the oxygen ion (O-) mobility, and accelerating the charge transportation. In contrast to the dark situation, the signal intensity of O- under visible light irradiation is obviously increased for 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4, indicating the excellent electron-migrating ability of 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4. More importantly, the boosted electron mobility and accelerated charge transportation could induce the formation of more active oxygen (O-), so 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 might show outstanding performance in NO purification under visible light irradiation. The enhanced light adsorption ability (Fig. 5(a)) and the boosted oxygen-ion (O-) mobility should be contributed from the combination of MnOx and g-C3N4. Thus, 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 can be expected to an excellent photo-thermal catalyst.

3.5 UV-Vis-light-induced photo-thermal catalytic NO oxidation

As shown in Fig. 6, the temperature increases gradually with irradiation time and is stabilized at approximately 60 ℃ under UV-Vis light irradiation for 1 h, providing the photo-thermal condition for NO removal. In contrast to the pristine MnOx and g-C3N4, the photocatalytic activity for NO removal is significantly enhanced on the MnOx/g-C3N4 hydride. Among the various samples, the 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 sample exhibits the most efficient performance for NO removal, with a NO removal ratio of 44%, exceeding that of the MnOx (27%) and g-C3N4 (36%). This result suggests that the MnOx/g-C3N4 might demonstrate a special photo-thermal catalytic effect (PTCE) ascribed to the enlarged specific surface (Fig. 4), the enhanced light adsorption (Fig. 5(a)) by introducing MnOx, and the boosted oxygen-ion (O-) mobility by introducing g-C3N4 (Fig. 5(b)).

Fig. 6. Photo-thermal catalytic activity towards NO removal under UV-Vis light irradiation.
3.6 In situ DRIFTS investigation and synergistic photo-thermal catalytic mechanism

To reveal the conversion pathways and mechanisms of NO oxidation at 60 ℃ with MnOx and 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4, in situ DRIFTS is carried out to dynamically monitor the reaction intermediates and products over the catalyst surface in time sequence. Tables 2 and 3 summarize the assignment of the observed bands.

Table 2
Assignments of the infrared (IR) bands observed during NO adsorption and NO oxidation at 60 ℃ over MnOx.
Table 3
Assignments of the IR bands observed during NO adsorption and NO oxidation at 60 ℃ over 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4.

As shown in Fig. 7(a) and (b), the strong absorption band at 1247 cm-1 and the weak band at 1028 cm-1 can be assigned to bidentate nitrate [34-36]. The peak at 1388 cm-1 is possibly indexed to free nitrate ions bonded to Mnn+ [37]. In addition, the peak located at 1446 cm-1 is assigned to the Mn-NO2 group [38, 39]. Moreover, the adsorption band at 1536 cm-1 is assigned to the νas(NO3-) split and the peak at 1624 cm-1 is assigned to NO3- (bridged) [39, 40]. The peak at 3590 cm-1 is attributed to H-bonded OH groups [41]. These results suggest that the amounts of nitrate in different forms are formed through NO oxidation over MnOx, corresponding to the increased Mn-nitrate species after reaction for used MnOx as shown in Fig. 3(a). The electron transfer between Mn3+ and Mn4+ ions cis expressed in Eqs. (1)–(3) [4]. Moreover, the intensities of all peaks are conspicuously increased in Fig. 7(a), while the intensities of the corresponding peaks are unchanged in Fig. 7(b). These results reveal that MnOx demonstrates the TCR of NO oxidation at 60 ℃ with a weak effect of light irradiation.

(1)
(2)
(3)
Fig. 7. In situ DRIFTS spectra of NO adsorption and photo-thermal catalytic reaction processes over MnOx (a, b) and 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 (c, d).

According to these results and the literature on the thermal catalytic mechanism with MnOx [4, 42-45], a possible mechanism of NO adsorption and oxidation over MnOx is proposed in Scheme 2. The process could be described as follows. First, NO is adsorbed on the metal sites, and then the nitrosyls are formed. Simultaneously, the adsorption of O2 molecules is activated by the redox cycles between manganese species (Mn4+/Mn3+) in the oxygen vacancy, and active oxygen (O-) radicals are generated. Subsequently, the nitrosyls are converted to nitroxyls via interaction between nitrosyls and O-. Then, nitroxyls are transformed to NO2 due to the interaction between nitroxyls and H2O. Ultimately, a large proportion of NO2 would be oxidized to nitrates via the reaction with O-. Furthermore, abundant nitrates cannot be decomposed, but instead are bonded to MnOx, corresponding to the appearance and increased concentration of Mn-nitrate over used MnOx observed in Fig. 3(a).

Scheme 2. Mechanism of NO adsorption without light and NO oxidation with light over MnOx at 60 ℃.

Fig. 7(c) and (d) reveal the process of NO adsorption and oxidation over 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4. The peaks at 1227, 3400, and 3608 cm-1 can be assigned to the νas(NO3-) split [39], H2O (ads) [45], and H-bonded OH groups [41], respectively. Obviously, the absorption band at 1300 cm-1 is observed and can be assigned to νas(NO2-) [44]. Furthermore, the absorption bands at 1104 and 1375 cm-1 indexing to N2O2- are observed, and their intensity increases gradually with light irradiation [37]. Simultaneously, the broad peak at 2420–2900 cm-1, assigned to nitrates [39, 45, 46], could be found, and the intensity distinctly increases, as shown in Fig. 7(d). In addition, the peak at 3565 cm-1 decreases gradually with time, and it can be assigned to NOH [39]. In contrast to the NO absorption band in Fig. 7(c), the intensity of the peak at 3565 cm-1 (NOH) decreases rapidly under UV-Vis light irradiation, while the peaks at 3400 and 3608 cm-1 become obviously strong.

According to these results and previous work on NO adsorption over MnOx and g-C3N4 [17, 18, 39, 43, 47, 48], the possible adsorption and PTCR processes are proposed as shown in Scheme 3. The two-dimensional geometry and surface hydroxyl groups of g-C3N4 could facilitate the adsorption of NO. Therefore, the appearance of N2O2- and NOH may be attributed to the reaction of NO on the surface of g-C3N4. During the adsorption process, the reduced metal centers and oxygen defects are created thermally on MnOx and are sites of O2 adsorption and activation. That is, the oxygen transfer from molecular oxygen to the active oxygen (O-) of Mn4+ (MnO2) or Mn3+ (Mn2O3) or Mn2+ (MnO) could achieve the activation of molecular oxygen. O- would then react with the intermediates (NOH and N2O2-), generating nitrate species. Interestingly, during the PTCR process, the g-C3N4 produced a large amount of photo-generated electron-hole pairs (e--h+) under UV-Vis light irradiation, which could participate in the catalytic cycles, thus accelerating the transformation of NOH and N2O2- to form nitrate species (NO3- or NO2-). The MnOx/g-C3N4 interlayer areas provide important interfaces where the photo-generated electron-hole pairs (e--h+) could greatly accelerate charge transfer between Mn4+, Mn3+, and Mn2+ species, and increase the generation of active oxygen (O-). This is consistent with the EPR signal intensity of the electron-deficient surface oxygen anion O- over 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 under light irradiation in Fig. 5(b). Specifically, photo-generated electrons (e-) are transferred to MnOx and participate in the reduction of manganese species (Mn4+→Mn3+→Mn2+), which is called the synergistic photo-thermal reduction cycle. During this reduction cycle, electrons (e-) are inclined to transfer to oxygen vacancies and be captured by surface-adsorbed oxygen to generate active oxygen (O-). Simultaneously, the oxidation of manganese species (Mn2+→Mn3+→Mn4+) can regenerate the active oxygen vacancy sites and inject electrons into the g-C3N4 hole (h+), which is called the synergistic photo-thermal regeneration cycle. These redox cycles can be also verified via the weakly changed concentrations of Mn ions over used 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 in Fig. 3(b). As a result, a greater amount of active oxygen (O-) can be sustainably produced to participate in NO oxidation, thus enhancing the catalytic performance of MnOx/g-C3N4 catalyst for NO removal.

Scheme 3. Mechanism of NO adsorption without light and NO oxidation with light over 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 at 60 ℃.
4 Conclusions

MnOx/g-C3N4 catalysts with different molar ratios were prepared by precipitation at room temperature. The results show that the samples demonstrate low crystallinity with various manganese oxides (e.g., MnO, MnO2, or Mn2O3). The 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4 catalyst showed relatively stable and synergistic photo-thermal catalytic activity towards NO purification under UV-Vis light irradiation. In situ DRIFTS was carried out to dynamically monitor the reaction intermediates and products over the catalyst surface in a time sequence and revealed the conversion pathways and mechanisms of NO oxidation at 60℃ with MnOx and 1-5 MnOx/g-C3N4. For NO adsorption and NO oxidation over MnOx, the NO conversion process is mainly assigned to TCR. NO could be adsorbed in the form of bidentate or monodentate nitrites by reacting with the generated active oxygen (O-) in the redox cycles between manganese species (Mn4+/Mn3+). For the NO adsorption and NO oxidation over 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4, the NO conversion process under light irradiation can be attributed to PTCR. First, NO and O2 molecules will be adsorbed on the surface of g-C3N4 and transformed into the intermediates (NOH and N2O2-). The O2 molecules could be transformed to active oxygen (O-) through the redox cycles between manganese species (Mn4+/Mn3+/Mn2+). When g-C3N4 was irradiated under light, the electron-hole pairs (e--h+) would be produced and participate in the oxygen activation and oxygen transfer over MnOx and generate a significant catalytic cycle. The catalytic cycle will accelerate charge transportation and produce more active oxygen (O-). Specifically, during the synergistic photo-thermal reduction cycle (Mn4+→Mn3+→Mn2+), photo-generated electrons (e-) are transferred to MnOx and captured by surface-adsorbed oxygen to generate active oxygen (O-). Furthermore, the reverse cycle (Mn2+ →Mn3+→Mn4+) can regenerate the active oxygen vacancy sites and inject electrons into the g-C3N4 hole (h+). Finally, there will be abundant O- generated to react to intermediates (NOH and N2O2-) and generate abundant final products (NO3- or NO2-). Thus, the synergistic photo-thermal performance of MnOx/g-C3N4 catalysts for NO removal will be enhanced. In this work, we proposed reaction mechanisms for the TCR process over MnOx and the PTCR process over 1:5 MnOx/g-C3N4, which can provide useful guidance for the development of better catalysts towards NOx purification in the future.

References
[1] V. I. Pârvulescu, P. Grange, B. Delmon, Catal. Today, 1998, 46: 233–316. DOI:10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00399-X
[2] C. F. You, X. C. Xu, Energy, 2010, 35: 4467–4472. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2009.04.019
[3] F. Dong, T. Xiong, Y. J. Sun, L. L. Lu, Y. X. Zhang, H. J. Zhang, H. W. Huang, Y. Zhou, Z. B. Wu, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 219: 450–458. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.082
[4] M. Y. Zhang, C. T. Li, L. Qu, M. F. Fu, G. M. Zeng, C. Z. Fan, J. F. Ma, F. M. Zhan, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014, 300: 58–65. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.02.002
[5] L. Olsson, H. Persson, E. Fridell, M. Skoglundh, B. Andersson, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105: 6895–6906. DOI:10.1021/jp010324p
[6] M. Jabłońska, R. Palkovits, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6: 49–72. DOI:10.1039/C5CY00646E
[7] Y. Y. Du, Z. L. Hua, W. M. Huang, M. Y. Wu, M. Wang, J. Wang, X. Z. Cui, L. X. Zhang, H. R. Chen, J. L. Shi, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51: 5887–5889. DOI:10.1039/C5CC00269A
[8] M. Kang, E. D. Park, J. M. Kim, J. E Yie, Appl. Catal. A, 2007, 327: 261–269. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2007.05.024
[9] H. Tong, S. X. Ouyang, Y. P. Bi, N. Umezawa, M. Oshikiri, J. H. Ye, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24: 229–251. DOI:10.1002/adma.201102752
[10] Z. H. Ai, W. K. Ho, S. C. Lee, L. Z. Zhang, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2009, 43: 4143–4150. DOI:10.1021/es9004366
[11] C. Xue, H. An, X.Q. Yan, J. L. Li, B. L. Yang, J. J. Wei, G. D. Yang, Nano Energy, 2017, 39: 513–523. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.07.030
[12] B. Lin, G. D. Yang, B. L. Yang, Y. X. Zhao, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 198: 276–285.
[13] J. Y. Li, W. Cui, Y. J. Sun, Y. Chu, W. L. Cen, F. Dong, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5: 9358–9364. DOI:10.1039/C7TA02183F
[14] W. Ding, S. Q. Liu, Z. He, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 1711–1718. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62907-3
[15] K. Wei, K. X. Li, Z. X. Zeng, Y. H. Dai, L. S. Yan, H. Q. Guo, X. B. Luo, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 1804–1811. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62912-7
[16] B. Lin, H. An, X. Q. Yan, T. X. Zhang, J. J. Wei, G. D. Yang, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 210: 173–183. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.03.066
[17] F. Dong, Z. Y. Wang, Y. H. Li, W. K. Ho, S. C. Lee, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2014, 48: 10345–10353. DOI:10.1021/es502290f
[18] W. Cui, J. Y. Li, W. L. Cen, Y. J. Sun, S. C. Lee, F. Dong, J. Catal., 2017, 352: 351–360. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2017.05.017
[19] B. Lin, H. Li, H. An, W. B. Hao, J. J. Wei, Y. Z. Dai, C. S. Ma, G. D. Yang, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 220: 542–552. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.071
[20] Y. Yu, Y. F. Bu, Q. Zhong, W. Cai, Catal. Commun., 2016, 87: 62–65. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2016.08.037
[21] F. Fina, S. K. Callear, G. M. Carins, J. T. S. Irvine, Chem. Mater., 2015, 27: 2612–2618. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00411
[22] G. G. Zhang, J. S. Zhang, M. W. Zhang, X. C. Wang, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22: 8083–8091. DOI:10.1039/c2jm00097k
[23] A. Thomas, A. Fischer, F. Goettmann, M. Antonietti, J. O. Mueller, R. Schloegl, J. M. Carlsson, J. Mater. Chem., 2008, 18: 4893–4908. DOI:10.1039/b800274f
[24] G. G. Zhang, J. S. Zhang, M. W. Zhang, X. C. Wang, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22: 8083–8091. DOI:10.1039/c2jm00097k
[25] Y. Y. Du, Z. L. Hua, W. M. Huang, M. Y. Wu, M. Wang, J. Wang, X. Z. Cui, L. X. Zhang, H. R. Chen, J. L. Shi, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51: 5887–5889. DOI:10.1039/C5CC00269A
[26] K. H. Park, S. M. Lee, S. S. Kim, D. W. Kwon, S. C. Hong, Catal. Lett., 2013, 143: 246–253. DOI:10.1007/s10562-012-0952-8
[27] J. H. Li, J. J. Chen, R. Ke, C. K. Luo, J. M. Hao, Catal. Commun., 2007: 81896–1900.
[28] X. J. Yao, K. L. Ma, W. X. Zou, S. G. He, J. B. An, F. M. Yang, L. Dong, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 146–159. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62572-X
[29] F. D. Liu, H. He, Y. Ding, C. B. Zhang, Appl. Catal. B, 2009, 93: 194–204. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.09.029
[30] V. P. Santos, M. F. R. Pereira, J. J. M. Órfão, J. L. Figueiredo, Appl. Catal. B, 2010, 99: 353–363. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.07.007
[31] W. P. Shan, F. D. Liu, H. He, X. Y. Shi, C. B. Zhang, Appl. Catal. B, 2012: 115–116, 100-106.
[32] Y. H. Li, W. K. Ho, Z. W. Zhao, Y. Huang, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 321–329. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62573-1
[33] M. Sterrer, O. Diwald, E. Kn, ö zinger, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2000, 104: 3601–3607. DOI:10.1021/jp993924l
[34] I. Nakamura, S. Sugihara, K. Takeuchi, Chem. Lett., 2000: 1276–1277.
[35] C. Sedlmair, K. Seshan, A. Jentys, J.A. Lercher, J. Catal., 2003, 214: 308–316. DOI:10.1016/S0021-9517(02)00085-4
[36] G. Ramis, G. Busca, V. Lorenzelli, P. Rorzatti, Appl. Catal., 1990, 64: 243–253. DOI:10.1016/S0166-9834(00)81564-X
[37] M. Chen, Z. H. Wang, D. M. Han, F. B. Gu, G. S. Guo, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115: 12763–12773. DOI:10.1021/jp201816d
[38] Z. B. Wu, B. Q. Jiang, Y. Liu, H. Q. Wang, R. B. Jin, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2007, 41: 5812–5817. DOI:10.1021/es0700350
[39] M. Mihaylov, K. Chakarova, K. Hadjiivanov, J. Catal., 2004, 228: 273–281. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2004.08.039
[40] B. Azambre, L. Zenboury, A. Koch, J. V. Weber, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113: 13287–13299.
[41] J. C. S. Wu, Y. T. Cheng, J. Catal., 2006, 237: 393–404. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2005.11.023
[42] M. M. Azis, H. Harelind, D. Creaser, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 5: 296–309.
[43] N. Tang, Y. Liu, H.Q. Wang, Z. B. Wu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115: 8214–8220. DOI:10.1021/jp200920z
[44] M. Kantcheva, J. Catal., 2001, 204: 479–494. DOI:10.1006/jcat.2001.3413
[45] B. Azambre, L. Zenboury, A. Koch, J. V. Weber, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113: 13287–13299.
[46] M. Kantcheva, A. S. Vakkasoglu, J. Catal., 2004, 223: 352–363. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2004.02.007
[47] L. Lu, H. Tian, J. H. He, Q. W. Yang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120: 23660–23668. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08312
[48] K. C. Schwartzenberg, J. W. J. Hamilton, A. K. Lucid, E. Weitz, J. Notestein, M. Nolan, J. A. Byrne, K. A. Gray, Catal. Today, 2017, 280: 65–73. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2016.06.002