催化学报  2018, Vol. 39 Issue (4): 654-663   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Hua An
Bo Lin
Chao Xue
Xiaoqing Yan
Yanzhu Dai
JinJia Wei
Guidong Yang
Formation of BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composites with high visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity
Hua Ana, Bo Lina, Chao Xuea, Xiaoqing Yana, Yanzhu Daib, JinJia Weia, Guidong Yanga     
a. XJTU-Oxford International Joint Laboratory for Catalysis, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, Shaanxi, China;
b. Electronic Materials Research Laboratory, Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education, Center for Dielectric Research, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, Shaanxi, China
* Corresponding author. Guidong Yang, Tel/Fax: +86-29-82665836; E-mail: guidongyang@xjtu.edu.cn
Foundation item: This work was supported by the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (2017JZ001), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21303130), State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing (SKLOP201602001), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (cxtd2017004). Thanks for the technical support from International Center for Dielectric Research (ICDR), Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China; the authors also appreciate Ms. Dai and Mr. Ma for their help in using SEM, EDX and TEM, respectively
Abstract: Constructing binary heterojunctions is an important strategy to improve the photocatalytic performance of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4). In this paper, a novel g-C3N4 nanosheet-based composite was constructed via in situ growth of bismuth oxyiodide (BiOI) nanoplates on the surface of g-C3N4 nanosheets. The crystal phase, microstructure, optical absorption and textural properties of the synthesized photocatalysts were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), and nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm measurements. The BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite showed high activity and recyclability for the photodegradation of the target pollutant rhodamine B (RhB). The conversion of RhB (20 mg L-1) by the photocatalyst was nearly 100% after 50 min under visible-light irradiation. The high photoactivity of the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite can be attributed to the enhanced visible-light absorption of the g-C3N4 nanosheets sensitized by BiOI nanoplates as well as the high charge separation efficiency obtained by the establishment of an internal electric field between the n-type g-C3N4 and p-type BiOI. Based on the characterization and experimental results, a double-transfer mechanism of the photoinduced electrons in the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite was proposed to explain its activity. This work represents a new strategy to understand and realize the design and synthesis of g-C3N4 nanosheet-based heterojunctions that display highly efficient charge separation and transfer.
© 2018, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: g-C3N4    BiOI    Nanosheet    Photodegradation    Double-transfer mechanism    Visible light    
新型BiOI/g-C3N4纳米片复合光催化剂的制备及其可见光催化活性增强
安华a, 林波a, 薛超a, 严孝清a, 代艳竹b, 魏进家a, 杨贵东a     
a. 西安交通大学化学工程与技术学院, 西安交通大学-牛津大学催化国际联合实验室, 陕西西安 710049;
b. 西安交通大学电子与信息工程学院, 电子陶瓷与器件教育部重点实验室, 陕西西安 710049
摘要:近年来,石墨型氮化碳(g-C3N4)作为一种n型半导体光催化剂材料,由于具有较好的热稳定性和化学稳定性,同时具有可调的带隙结构和优异的表面性质而备受人们关注.然而,传统的g-C3N4块体材料存在比表面积小、光响应范围窄和光生载流子易复合等缺陷,制约着其光催化活性的进一步提高.因此,人们开发了多种技术对块体状g-C3N4材料进行改性,其中构建基于g-C3N4纳米薄片的异质结复合光催化材料被认为是强化g-C3N4载流子分离效率,进而提高其可见光催化活性的重要手段.BiOI作为一种窄带隙的p型半导体光催化剂,具有强的可见光吸收能力和较高的光催化活性,同时它与g-C3N4纳米薄片具有能级匹配的带隙结构.因此,基于以上两种半导体材料的特性,构建新型的BiOI/g-C3N4纳米片复合光催化剂材料不仅能够有效提高g-C3N4的可见光利用率,而且还可以在n型g-C3N4和p型BiOI界面间形成内建电场,极大促进光生电子-空穴对的分离与迁移效率. 为此,本文通过简单的一步溶剂热法在g-C3N4纳米薄片表面原位生长BiOI纳米片材料,成功制备了新型的BiOI/g-C3N4纳米片复合光催化剂.利用X射线衍射仪(XRD),场发射扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、透射电子显微镜(TEM)、紫外-可见漫反射光谱和瞬态光电流响应谱对所合成复合光催化剂的晶体结构、微观形貌、光吸收性能和电荷分离性能进行了表征测试.XRD,SEM和TEM结果显示,结晶完好的BiOI呈小片状均匀分散在g-C3N4纳米薄片表面;紫外漫反射光谱表明,纳米片复合材料的吸光性能较g-C3N4薄片有显著提升;瞬态光电流测试证明,复合材料较单一材料有更好的电荷分离与迁移性能.在可见光催化降解RhB的测试中,BiOI/g-C3N4纳米片复合光催化剂显示出了优异的催化活性和稳定性,其光降解活性分别为纯BiOI和g-C3N4的34.89和1.72倍;自由基捕获实验发现,反应过程中的主要活性物种为超氧自由基(·O2-),即光生电子主导整个降解反应的发生.由此可见,强的可见光吸收能力和g-C3N4与BiOI界面处形成的内建电场协同促进了g-C3N4纳米薄片的电荷分离,进而显著提高了该复合材料的可见光催化降解活性.此外,本文初步验证了在BiOI/g-C3N4纳米片复合光催化体系内光生电荷是依据"双向转移"机制进行分离和迁移的,而非"Z型转移"机制.
关键词g-C3N4    BiOI    纳米片    光降解    双向转移    可见光    

1 Introduction

Recently, graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) has attracted intense attention as a visible-light-driven metal-free n-type semiconductor because of its high chemical and thermal stability (up to 600 ℃ in air), adjustable band-gap energy, and desirable electronic and optical properties [1-6]. Although g-C3N4 has a lot of advantageous features, it still has some limitations, such as relatively low solar energy conversion efficiency, low visible light utilization, and poor quantum efficiency caused by the fast recombination of photogenerated electron–hole pairs [7-10], all of which restrict the widespread use of g-C3N4 in photocatalysis. Many strategies have been employed to overcome the inherent disadvantages of g-C3N4, including non-metal doping [11], metal doping [12], and constructing three-dimensionally ordered macroporous [13] and heterojunction [14] structures. Among these methods, the construction of g-C3N4 nanosheet-based heterojunctions is considered to be the most promising approach to greatly improve the overall performance of g-C3N4. This is because the nanosheet structure of g-C3N4 possesses large surface area, numerous surface defects, and high charge separation efficiency compared with the properties of traditional bulk g-C3N4 [15-19], which can considerably enhance its photocatalytic activity. To date, various g-C3N4 nanosheet-based heterostructures with high quantum efficiency and photocatalytic activity have been synthesized, such as NaNbO3/g-C3N4 [20], MoS2/g-C3N4 [21], TiO2/g-C3N4 [22], ZnIn2S4/g-C3N4 [23], BiOBr/g-C3N4 [24], CaIn2S4/g-C3N4 [25], and WO3/g-C3N4 [26].

Bismuth oxyiodide (BiOI) is a typical p-type semiconductor that has been extensively investigated recently because of its narrow adjustable band gap (1.78 eV) and strong absorption capacity in the visible region. Additionally, BiOI is also a potential sensitizer for other wide-band-gap semiconductors [27-29]. BiOI is composed of interleaved [Bi2O2]2+ slabs and [I2]2- slabs, which can form an internal electric field, promoting the separation of photogenerated electron–hole pairs [30-32]. Considering the unique properties of BiOI, an attractive strategy is to couple g-C3N4 and BiOI to construct binary heterojunction composites, which could not only effectively improve the visible light utilization, but also establish an internal electric field at the phase interface of n-type g-C3N4 and p-type BiOI, benefitting the fast separation and hindering the recombination of photoinduced electron–hole pairs [33-35].

In this paper, a novel BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite is prepared via in situ growth of BiOI nanoplates on the surface of g-C3N4 nanosheets by the solvothermal method. The crystal phase, microstructure, textural properties, and optical absorption behavior of the synthesized composite photocatalyst are measured by a variety of characterization techniques. The potential application value of the BiOI/g-C3N4 composite is evaluated by its ability to photodegrade rhodamine B (RhB) under visible light. In addition, possible photocatalytic mechanisms are proposed to explain the transfer route of photogenerated charges and the origin of the catalytic activity of the composite.

2 Experimental
2.1 Materials synthesis

All reagents were of analytical grade and used without further treatment.

2.1.1 Synthesis of g-C3N4 nanosheets

A certain amount of melamine was directly calcined at 520 ℃ for 4 h in a tube furnace under a nitrogen atmosphere after heating at a rate of 2.5 ℃ min-1 to give yellow bulk g-C3N4. Then, the bulk g-C3N4 (2 g) was directly calcined at 530 ℃ for 5 h in air in a muffle furnace. The resultant white g-C3N4 powder was collected for use in further experiments.

2.1.2 Synthesis of the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite

In a typical synthesis, a certain amount of Bi(NO3)3·5H2O and g-C3N4 nanosheets (0.2 g) were added to ethylene glycol (EG; 20 mL) and vigorously stirred for 4 h to form solution A. An equimolar amount of KI was dissolved in deionized water (5 mL) and stirred for 30 min to form solution B. Solution B was added dropwise into solution A with continuous stirring, and then the resulting mixture was poured into a 50-mL Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave, which was subsequently heated at 160 ℃ for 45 min. After the autoclave was cooled to room temperature, the resultant precipitate was centrifuged and washed with water and ethanol several times, then dried at 60 ℃ for 12 h. The theoretic weight ratio of BiOI to g-C3N4 was 3:100. Pure BiOI without g-C3N4 nanosheets was synthesized under the same conditions. BiOI and pure g-C3N4 nanosheets were used as reference samples.

2.2 Characterization

The crystal phases of all samples were determined by X-ray diffraction (Shimadzu, Lab X XRD-6100). Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were measured on a Nicolet Avatar 360 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, Nicolet iS50). The microstructure and morphology of all samples were examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEOL, JEM-2100) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JEOL, JSM-6700F, 200 kV). UV-vis diffuse reflection spectra were recorded for dry-pressed disk samples on a Hitachi U-4100 UV-vis spectrometer (Shimadzu, UV-2600) using BaSO4 as the reference. The textural properties of the photocatalysts were investigated using a Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analyzer (Quantachrome, Autosorb-iQ-TPX), and the specific surface area and pore size distribution of each sample were obtained using the BET equation.

2.3 Photocatalytic activity measurement

The photocatalytic activities of all catalyst samples were evaluated by their ability to degrade RhB solution (20 mg L-1) using a 300-W Xe lamp (HSX-F300, Beijing NBeT) equipped with an optical cutoff filter (HSX-UV300) as the visible light source (λ ≥ 420 nm). Before illumination, each as-prepared sample (0.03 g) was added to RhB aqueous solution (30 mL) and then stirred in the dark for 1 h to reach adsorption-desorption equilibrium. The stirred mixture was then exposed to visible light. At 10 min intervals, 1.5-mL aliquots of the mixture were removed and centrifuged to isolate the photocatalyst powder. The residual RhB concentration was then measured on a UV-vis spectrophotometer (UV-1900PPC, Shanghai, China). To investigate the repeatability and stability of the catalysts, recycling experiments were executed under the same reaction conditions. After reaction for 50 min, the residual concentration of the RhB solution was tested. The collected sample was washed with water, dried at 60 ℃ in air, and then put into the same volume of fresh RhB solution (20 mg L-1) for the next photodegradation cycle.

2.4 Photocatalytic H2 evolution

The photocatalytic H2 evolution reaction of the composite was tested on in a Pyrex reaction cell at room temperature. First, 3 wt% of Pt was deposited on the surface of the composite as a co-catalyst. The sample (0.05 g) was dispersed in water (50 mL) containing triethanolamine (10 mL) as a sacrificial electron donor. The resulting suspension was bubbled with N2 for 5 min to remove O2 and then irradiated by a 300-W Xe lamp (HSX-F300, Beijing NBeT) with a UV filter (λ ≥ 420 nm) to ensure the suspension was only irradiated with visible light. The amount of H2 produced was analyzed by an online gas chromatograph (GC; Beifen-Ruili) with a thermal conductivity detector.

2.5 Photoelectrochemical measurements

The transient photocurrent responses of the as-prepared samples were recorded on an electrochemical workstation (CHI 660D, Chenhua, Shanghai, China) with a three-electrode system. Pt wire, Ag/AgCl, and a glassy carbon electrode (0.07065 cm2) modified with an as-prepared sample served as the counter, reference, and working electrodes, respectively. The electrolyte was Na2SO4 aqueous solution (1 mol L-1).

3 Results and discussion

The overall synthetic pathway to the BiOI/g-C3N4 composite is shown in Fig. 1. The g-C3N4 nanosheets were first synthesized via thermal exfoliation of bulk g-C3N4 at 530 ℃ for 5 h in air to break the hydrogen bonds between g-C3N4 layers [15]. Then, EG and Bi(NO3)3·5H2O were mixed with the g-C3N4 nanosheets. EG was selected as the solvent because it can coordinate with Bi3+ to produce the alkoxide complex Bi(OCH2CH2OH)2+ (hereafter denoted as Bi(OR)2+) [36], which can prevent the premature reaction of Bi3+. Additionally, the negative polarity of the g-C3N4 surface [37, 38] means that it can readily adsorb Bi(OR)2+ through electrostatic attraction without needing further surface modification. During the solvothermal procedure, BiOI nanoplates were controllably synthesized on the surface of the g-C3N4 nanosheets by adding KI aqueous solution as an iodine source, finally providing the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite.

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the synthetic route to the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composites.

Fig. 2(a) shows the XRD patterns of the as-prepared g-C3N4 nanosheets, BiOI/g-C3N4 composite, and pure BiOI. The g-C3N4 nanosheets exhibited two characteristic diffraction peaks at 13.02° (weak) and 27.48° (strong) in their XRD pattern. The strong and weak peaks correspond to the (002) and (100) diffraction planes, respectively, derived from the interplanar spacing and stacked in-plane repeating units in the aromatic system [4], consistent with the typical peaks for other reported g-C3N4 [17]. All peaks observed for BiOI are in accordance with tetragonal-phase BiOI (PDF #10-0445) [29, 32]. The stronger peaks at 29.60°, 31.61°, 45.36°, 51.29°, and 55.12° are indexed to the (102), (110), (200), (114) and (212) diffraction planes of BiOI, respectively. The XRD pattern for the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite contained the characteristic peaks of the two components, including the (002) diffraction peak of g-C3N4 and (102), (110), (200), (114), and (212) diffraction peaks of BiOI. This indicates that the BiOI nanoplates are well coupled with the g-C3N4 nanosheets. Note that the (002) diffraction peak from g-C3N4 in the composite shifted from 27.48° to 27.88° after solvothermal treatment. This is because the initial undulating structure of the g-C3N4 nanosheets in the BiOI/g-C3N4 composite changed to a planar structure during heat treatment, thus resulting in denser stacking and decreased gallery distance in the composite [15].

Fig. 2. XRD patterns (a) and FT-IR spectra (b) of the as-prepared samples.

The FT-IR spectra of all samples are shown in Fig. 2(b). The absorption peak of pure BiOI at around 763 cm-1 can be assigned to the symmetric stretching vibrations of Bi–O bonds [39, 40]. The pure g-C3N4 displayed absorption peaks at around 806 and 1200–1700 cm-1, which were attributed to the breathing modes of s-triazine and the stretching vibration of the CN heterocycles, respectively [5, 37]. The absorption peak at 3165 cm-1 is assigned to the residual N-H components from secondary and primary amines [13]. When BiOI grows in situ on the surface of g-C3N4 to form the heterostructured composite, the characteristic absorption peaks of both components are observed, revealing that BiOI has been introduced onto g-C3N4.

The microstructure and morphology of all samples were further examined by SEM and TEM. As illustrated in Fig. 3(a), the g-C3N4 nanosheets exhibited a crumpled and rough surface formed by stacking of a large number of g-C3N4 nanoparticles [14]. Thus, the g-C3N4 nanosheets can provide enough surface area to couple with BiOI nanoplates. Fig. 3(b) shows a TEM image of the pure g-C3N4, which clearly confirms that the g-C3N4 nanosheets possess smooth flat surfaces, similar to that of graphene nanosheets. The SAED pattern in the inset of Fig. 3(b) indicates that the g-C3N4 nanosheets possess a polycrystalline structure. As displayed in Fig. 3(c) and (d), the pure BiOI sample possesses its typical hierarchical structure of nanoplates self-assembled to form flower-like motifs with a diameter of about 2–3 μm. The SAED pattern for a BiOI microflower shows that the pure BiOI is well crystallized; the diffraction spots indicate its single crystal nature and tetragonal phase.

Fig. 3. SEM (a) and TEM (b) images of pure g-C3N4 nanosheets (inset: selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of g-C3N4). SEM (c) and TEM (d) images of pure BiOI (inset: SAED pattern of BiOI).

An SEM image of the as-prepared nanosheet composite is presented in Fig. 4(a). Both g-C3N4 and BiOI are observed in this SEM image, confirming that the BiOI nanoplates are well coupled with the g-C3N4 nanosheets. The energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) results (Fig. 4(b)) revealed the co-existence of C, N, O, Bi, and Ⅰ in the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite. The TEM images in Fig. 4(c) and (d) clearly exhibit the microstructure and morphology of the nanosheet composites, revealing that BiOI nanoplates are irregularity dispersed on the surface of the g-C3N4 nanosheets. The BiOI nanoplates are approximately circular planar structures with a diameter of about 100–200 nm. The SAED pattern in the inset of Fig. 4(c) contains full diffraction circles related to polycrystalline g-C3N4 and diffraction spots corresponding to single-crystal BiOI, further proving the existence of both semiconductors in the composite. The high-resolution TEM image in Fig. 4(e) clearly shows the surface microstructure and interface boundary between BiOI and g-C3N4. The lattice fringes of 0.282 nm can be indexed to the (110) facet of tetragonal-phase BiOI (PDF #10-0445), while the lattice fringes of g-C3N4 were not clearly detected because of its low crystallinity [7, 18].

Fig. 4. SEM image (a), energy-dispersive X-ray spectrum (b), TEM images (inset: SAED pattern) (c, d), and high-resolution TEM image (e) of the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite.

The UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of all the as-prepared samples are shown in Fig. 5. The brick-red pure BiOI sample displayed the most extensive optical absorption of the samples with its absorption edge at about 671 nm, corresponding to band-gap energy of 1.85 eV, and indicating that pure BiOI strongly absorbs visible light. The pure g-C3N4 nanosheets were white and only weakly absorbed visible light. Their absorption edge was at about 460 nm, giving estimated band-gap energy of 2.70 eV, which fits with previously reported for g-C3N4 [23, 27]. Compared with that of pure g-C3N4, the optical absorption of the pale yellow BiOI/g-C3N4 composite sample exhibits a redshift and high intensity, which is caused by coupling with BiOI [39]. These results indicate that the BiOI nanoplates could capture visible light when deposited on the surface of g-C3N4 nanosheets. In addition, the band structure of BiOI and g-C3N4 can be calculated using the following equations:

(1)
(2)
Fig. 5. UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of g-C3N4, BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite, and BiOI samples.

where X is the electronegativity of the semiconductor and has values of 4.73 for g-C3N4 [13] and 5.94 for BiOI [41]; Ee (4.5 eV) is the energy of free electrons on the hydrogen scale. The EVB values of BiOI and g-C3N4 were estimated to be 2.37 and 1.58 eV, respectively, and ECB were 0.52 and -1.12 eV, respectively.

To investigate the excitation and transfer of photogenerated charge carriers of the samples, their photocurrent responses under visible-light irradiation were measured. Fig. 6 shows the transient photocurrent responses of the samples at a bias potential of 0.3 V. The pure BiOI electrode displayed the weakest photocurrent response, illustrating the poor separation and transfer efficiency of photoinduced charge carriers. This phenomenon is attributed to the thick-layer stacking structure of pure BiOI (Fig. 3(c)), which leads to the following results. The photoinduced electrons in the bulk phase are difficult to transfer to the surface phase before recombination, and the gradual decrease of photocurrent response shows the poor stability of pure BiOI under visible-light irradiation. The pure g-C3N4 nanosheets exhibited a relatively strong photocurrent response, which means they display efficient excitation and fast transfer of photogenerated charge carriers, which was attributed to their thin layer structure. The BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite exhibited the highest photocurrent response among the samples. This is caused by the formation of a p-n junction; the internal electric field established between the n-type g-C3N4 and p-type BiOI accelerated the separation of electron–hole pairs and suppressed their recombination.

Fig. 6. Transient photocurrent responses of g-C3N4 nanosheets, the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite, and pure BiOI.

The textural properties of the BiOI, BiOI/g-C3N4, and g-C3N4 samples were examined using the N2 adsorption-desorption technique. As shown in Fig. 7(a), the adsorption-desorption isotherms for pure BiOI had no obvious hysteresis loop, suggesting this material contained almost no pores, consistent with the TEM observations. According to the IUPAC classification, the physisorption isotherms for the BiOI/g-C3N4 composite and g-C3N4 nanosheets are typical of type Ⅳ isotherms with an H3 hysteresis loop in the relative pressure (P/P0) range of 0.45–1.0, indicating that the pore size distribution belongs to the mesoporous region [7, 18]. The mesoporous structure of BiOI/g-C3N4 may originate from the stacking of g-C3N4 and BiOI particles [14]. The pore size distributions of all the samples determined by the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method are presented in Fig. 7(b). The main pore size for both BiOI/g-C3N4 and g-C3N4 was 1.96 nm, indicating the presence of some microporous structure in both of the nanosheet samples. Pure BiOI did not exhibit a pore distribution because of its thick stacked layer structure, which agreed well with the physisorption isotherms. In addition, the g-C3N4 nanosheets show the largest BET surface area (181.19 m2 g-1) and smaller pore volume (0.26 cm3 g-1), while the BiOI/g-C3N4 composite possesses a relatively smaller surface area (157.03 m2 g-1) and the highest pore volume (0.44 cm3 g-1). This is because part of the surface of the g-C3N4 nanosheets in the composite was covered by BiOI nanoplates, which had a small surface area (6.36 m2 g-1) and pore volume (0.04 cm3 g-1).

Fig. 7. (a) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of g-C3N4 nanosheets, the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite, and pure BiOI. (b) Pore size distributions of the samples determined using the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda method.

The photodegradation of RhB by the as-prepared catalysts in aqueous solution (20 mg L-1) under visible-light irradiation was investigated. As shown in Fig. 8(a), RhB as a target pollutant is quite stable and its photodegradation under visible-light irradiation in the absence of a photocatalyst is negligible [13]. The pure BiOI sample exhibited the lowest photodegradation efficiency of the samples, with a residual RhB concentration of about 89% after 50 min of irradiation. This indicates that BiOI has poor photocatalytic activity, which was attributed to the rapid recombination of electron–hole pairs. The pure g-C3N4 nanosheets displayed high photocatalytic activity with a residual RhB concentration of about 10% under the same conditions. As expected, the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite showed the highest photocatalytic activity of the samples with nearly 100% RhB conversion within 50 min of photoreaction, confirming that in situ growth of BiOI on g-C3N4 nanosheets can enhance the photocatalytic performance of g-C3N4.

Fig. 8. (a) Photodegradation efficiency of RhB solution (20 mg L-1) by g-C3N4 nanosheets, the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite, and BiOI; (b) Kinetic curves for photodegradation of RhB over the as-prepared samples; (c) Apparent constants for photodegradation of RhB by the samples; (d) Recycling experiments for the photodegradation of RhB solution using the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite.

To investigate the reaction dynamics of the RhB photodecomposition process over the different samples, the reaction kinetics of all the samples were quantitatively calculated using the Langmuir-Hinshelwood model [13, 14]:

(3)

where K is the pseudo-first-order rate constant, and C0 and C represent the initial concentration of RhB solution and the concentration after irradiation time t, respectively. Fig. 8(b) shows the apparent linear relationship between ln(C0/C) and t, which indicates that the photodegradation reaction obeys pseudo-first-order dynamics. As illustrated in Fig. 8(c), K values for the g-C3N4, BiOI/g-C3N4, and BiOI samples were 0.04048, 0.06978 and 0.002 min-1, respectively. The BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite has the highest K values of the samples; 1.72 times higher than that of pure g-C3N4 and 34.89 times higher than that of pure BiOI.

Recycling experiments for the photodegradation of RhB solution (20 mg L-1) over BiOI/g-C3N4 were performed to investigate its stability and recyclability. As depicted in Fig. 8(d), the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite showed excellent photocatalytic activity for the photodegradation of RhB (about 97.2% conversion after 50 min of irradiation) in the first cycle. In the second cycle test, the photocatalytic activity of BiOI/g-C3N4 decreased slightly; the RhB conversion lowered to 96.8% and then to 92.1% in the third cycle. In the fourth cycle, the RhB conversion declined to 90.9% after 50 min of photodegradation, but it was still higher than the conversions achieved in the first tests over pure BiOI (11.2%) and pure g-C3N4 (89.7%). In the fifth cycle, the conversion of RhB over BiOI/g-C3N4 was about 85%. The reasons for the slight decrease of photocatalytic activity could be the loss of the catalyst and/or structural damage.

To identify the main reactive species in the photocatalytic reaction, trapping experiments were performed for the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite by adding different scavengers. Isopropyl alcohol (IPA), benzoquinone (BQ), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium (EDTA-2Na) were used to scavenge hydroxyl radicals (·OH), superoxide radical anions (·O2-), and holes (h+), respectively, generated in the photocatalytic reaction. The dosage of scavengers was determined from our previous studies [13, 36]. As displayed in Fig. 9, the photocatalytic efficiency of RhB degradation by the BiOI/g-C3N4 composite was obviously inhibited by the addition of BQ (decreased to 60.6%) after 50 min of visible-light irradiation, indicating that ·O2- plays an important role in the photodegradation process. Conversely, with the scavengers IPA and EDTA-2Na, the RhB degradation efficiency still remained high (89.2% and 90.6%, respectively), suggesting that ·OH and h+ are not the main reactive species involved in oxidation of RhB by the photocatalyst. The above analysis indicates that ·O2- is the main reactive species in the decomposition of organic dye RhB over the BiOI/g-C3N4 heterojunction under visible-light irradiation, which means that photoinduced electrons dominate the overall reaction process.

Fig. 9. Photodegradation efficiency of RhB by the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite with different scavengers under visible-light irradiation.

Based on the above findings, two possible reaction mechanisms for the photodegradation of RhB over the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite were proposed as follows.

(1) The double-transfer mechanism. As shown in Fig. 10(a), under visible-light irradiation at energies below 2.95 eV (λ > 420 nm), the g-C3N4 nanosheets (ECB = -1.12 eV vs. NHE, EVB = 1.58 eV vs. NHE) can be excited to generate electron–hole pairs. The excited electrons transfer to the conduction band (CB), while the holes stay in the valence band (VB) of g-C3N4. Similarly, the BiOI (ECB = 0.52 eV vs. NHE, EVB = 2.37 eV vs. NHE) in this composite could be excited to generate a large number of high-energy electrons. These high-energy electrons can transfer thermodynamically from the VB of BiOI to the higher potential position of -0.58 eV in the CB of BiOI, which is more negative than O2/·O2- (-0.33 eV vs. NHE). Thus, the CB and VB positions of g-C3N4 are both more negative than those of BiOI. Therefore, in this case, a "staggered" p-n junction at the BiOI/g-C3N4 interface is formed, leading to the formation of an internal electric field in the direction from n-type g-C3N4 to p-type BiOI within the as-prepared nanosheet composite. This field is favorable for interfacial transfer of photoinduced charges and thus extends the lifetime of photoinduced electrons (Fig. 10(a)). Previous studies [41, 42, 44, 45] found that when the excited electrons rapidly transferred to the less negative CB of the surrounding BiOI, which still has strong reduction ability to react with dissolved oxygen or oxygen adsorbed on the catalyst surface to generate ·O2- and hydrogen peroxide, both the active species could fully oxidize organic dye pollutants to CO2 and H2O, consistent with the results of trapping experiments.

Fig. 10. Schematic diagram of the transfer of photoinduced electron–hole pairs. (a) The double-transfer mechanism; (b) The Z-scheme transfer mechanism.

(2) The Z-scheme transfer mechanism (Fig. 10(b)). Under visible-light irradiation at energies below 2.95 eV (λ > 420 nm), both BiOI and g-C3N4 are excited to generate electron-hole pairs. These excited electrons can quickly transfer to the CB of BiOI and g-C3N4, while the holes remain in the VB of BiOI and g-C3N4. A previous study [46] reported that I- near the p-n junction was easily oxidized to I3- by the photoinduced holes; I3- could also be reduced by the photoinduced electrons. In this process, the photogenerated electrons on the side of BiOI and photogenerated holes on the side of g-C3N4 can be efficiently separated because of the extremely high reversibility of the intermediate I3-/I- pairs achieved by Z-scheme transfer [46-48]. This may explain why the photoactivity of the composite is high under visible-light irradiation.

To determine which mechanism is closer to the true charge transfer path in RhB photodegradation by the samples, photocatalytic hydrogen (H2) production tests over the samples were carried out. The above discussion revealed that the theoretical ECB of the g-C3N4 nanosheets (about -1.12 eV vs. NHE) was more negative than the water reduction potential (0 eV vs. NHE). Therefore, if the charge transfer mode follows the Z-scheme transfer mode, the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite should show much higher photoactivity for H2 generation than that of pure g-C3N4. Fig. 11 shows the photocatalytic H2 production efficiency of the g-C3N4 nanosheet, BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite, and BiOI samples. The g-C3N4 nanosheets display excellent performance in photocatalytic H2 production; the rate of H2 evolution reaches about 0.52 mmol g-1 h-1. In contrast, the pure BiOI sample has no photoactivity for H2 production through water splitting. For the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite, only 0.07 mmol g-1 h-1 of H2 was generated after 2.5 h of photoreaction, indicating that most of the photogenerated electrons in the BiOI/g-C3N4 system do not take part in photocatalytic H2 generation through water splitting. According to these experimental results, we can infer that the charge transfer mode in the BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite should follow the double-transfer mechanism.

Fig. 11. Photocatalytic H2 evolution over g-C3N4 nanosheet, BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite, and BiOI samples.
4 Conclusions

In this work, we demonstrated a facile solvothermal approach to grow BiOI nanoplates on the surface of the g-C3N4 nanosheets to construct a novel BiOI/g-C3N4 nanosheet composite. The obtained sample showed excellent activity and recyclability for the degradation of target pollutant RhB, with nearly 100% conversion of RhB after 50 min of visible-light irradiation. The high photoactivity of the composite may be derived from the synergistic effect of the effective separation of charges caused by the formation of an internal electric field at the interface between n-type g-C3N4 and p-type BiOI, strong visible-light absorption, and large surface area and pore volume.

References
[1] Y. Hou, Z. H. Wen, S. M. Cui, X. R. Guo, J. H. Chen, Adv. Mater., 2013, 25: 6291–6297. DOI:10.1002/adma.201303116
[2] W. D. Zhang, Z. W. Zhao, F. Dong, Y. X. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 372–378. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62585-8
[3] B. Lin, S. Chen, F. Dong, G. D. Yang, Nanoscale, 2017, 9: 5273–5279. DOI:10.1039/C7NR00501F
[4] S. W. Zhang, J. X. Li, X. K. Wang, Y. S. Huang, M. Y. Zeng, J. Z. Xu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2014, 6: 22116–22125. DOI:10.1021/am505528c
[5] B. Lin, C. Xue, X. Q. Yan, G. D. Yang, G. Yang, B. L. Yang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 357: 346–355. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.041
[6] X. J. Bai, L. Wang, R. L. Zong, Y. F. Zhu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117: 9952–9961. DOI:10.1021/jp402062d
[7] B. Lin, H. An, X. Q. Yan, T. X. Zhang, J. J. Wei, G. D. Yang, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 210: 173–183. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.03.066
[8] X. D. Zhang, X. Xie, H. Wang, J. J. Zhang, B. C. Pan, Y. Xie, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135: 18–21. DOI:10.1021/ja308249k
[9] Y. Wang, X. C. Wang, M. Antonietti, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2012, 51: 68–89. DOI:10.1002/anie.201101182
[10] Y. Hou, Z. H. Wen, S. M. Cui, X. L. Feng, J. H. Chen, Nano Lett., 2016, 16: 2268–2277. DOI:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04496
[11] G. Liao, S. Chen, X. Quan, H. T. Yu, H. M. Zhao, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22: 2721–2726. DOI:10.1039/C1JM13490F
[12] G. G. Zhang, Z. A. Lan, L. H. Lin, S. Lin, X. C. Wang, Chem. Sci., 2016, 7: 3062–3066. DOI:10.1039/C5SC04572J
[13] B. Lin, G. D. Yang, B. L. Yang, Y. X. Zhao, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 198: 276–285. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.069
[14] J. J. Wang, L. Tang, G. M. Zeng, Y. Liu, Y. Y. Zhou, Y. C. Deng, J. J. Wang, B. Peng, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2017, 5: 1062–1072. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02351
[15] Q. Y. Lina, L. Li, S. J. Liang, M. H. Liu, J. H. Bi, L. Wu, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 163: 135–142. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.07.053
[16] P. Niu, L. L. Zhang, G. Liu, H. M. Cheng, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2012, 22: 4763–4770. DOI:10.1002/adfm.v22.22
[17] M. Xu, L. Han, S. J. Dong, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2013, 5: 12533–12540. DOI:10.1021/am4038307
[18] J. Q. Wen, J. Xie, Z. H. Yang, R. C. Shen, H. Y. Li, X. Y. Luo, X. B. Chen, X. Li, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2017, 5: 2224–2236. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02490
[19] W. J. Wang, J. C Yu, D. H. Xia, P. K. Wong, Y. C. Li, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 47: 8724–8732. DOI:10.1021/es4013504
[20] H. F. Shi, G. Q. Chen, C.L. Zhang, Z. G. Zou, ACS Catal., 2014, 4: 3637–3643. DOI:10.1021/cs500848f
[21] J. Yan, Z. G. Chen, H. Y. Ji, Z. Liu, X. Wang, Y. G. Xu, X. J. She, L. Y. Huang, L. Xu, H. Xu, H. M. Li, Chem. Eur. J., 2016, 22: 4764–4773. DOI:10.1002/chem.201503660
[22] K. Li, S. M. Gao, Q. Y. Wang, H. Xu, Z. Y. Wang, B. B. Huang, Y. Dai, J. Lu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7: 9023–9030. DOI:10.1021/am508505n
[23] W. Chen, T. Y. Liu, T. Huang, X. H. Liu, J. W. Zhu, G. R. Duan, X. J. Yang, J. Mater. Sci., 2015, 50: 8142–8152. DOI:10.1007/s10853-015-9388-z
[24] Y. J. Sun, W. D. Zhang, T. Xiong, Z. W. Zhao, F. Dong, R. Q. Wang, W. K. Ho, J. Colloid. Interf. Sci., 2014, 418: 317–323. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2013.12.037
[25] D. L. Jiang, J. Li, C. S. Xing, Z. Y. Zhang, S. C. Meng, M. Chen, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7: 19234–19242. DOI:10.1021/acsami.5b05118
[26] Y. G. Li, X. L. Wei, X. Y. Yan, J. T. Cai, A. N. Zhou, M. R. Yang, K. Q. Liu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18: 10255–10261. DOI:10.1039/C6CP00353B
[27] X. Xiao, W. D. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20: 5866–5870. DOI:10.1039/c0jm00333f
[28] Y. J. Sun, X. Xiao, X. Dong, F. Dong, W. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 217–226. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62753-0
[29] J. X. Xia, J. Di, H. T. Li, H. Xu, H. M. Li, S. J. Guo, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 181: 260–269. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.07.035
[30] L. Q. Ye, J. N. Chen, L. H. Tian, J. Y. Liu, T. Y. Peng, K. J. Deng, L. Zan, Appl. Catal. B, 2013, 130-131: 1–7. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.10.011
[31] X. Yu, J. J. Yang, K. H. Ye, X. H. Fu, Y. M. Zhang, Inorg. Chem. Com-mun., 2016, 71: 45–49. DOI:10.1016/j.inoche.2016.06.034
[32] S. Q. Han, J. Li, K.L. Yang, J. Lin, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36: 2119–2126. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(15)60974-3
[33] M. Yan, Y. Q. Hua, F. F. Zhu, W. Gu, J. H. Jiang, H. Q. Shen, W. D. Shi, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 202: 518–527. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.039
[34] Z. Y. Wang, Y. Huang, W. K. Ho, J. J. Cao, Z. X. Shen, S. C. Lee, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 199: 123–133. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.06.027
[35] J. Di, J. X. Xia, S. Yin, H. Xu, L. Xu, Y. G. Xu, M. Q. He, H. M. Li, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2: 5340–5351. DOI:10.1039/c3ta14617k
[36] C. Xue, X. Xu, G. D. Yang, S. J. Ding, RSC Adv., 2015, 5: 102228–102237. DOI:10.1039/C5RA20510G
[37] S. Yin, J. Di, M. Li, Y. L. Sun, J. X. Xia, H. Xu, W. M. Fan, H. M. Li, J. Mater. Sci., 2016, 51: 4769–4777. DOI:10.1007/s10853-016-9746-5
[38] Y. G. Xu, H. Xu, L. Wang, J. Yan, H. M. Li, Y. H. Song, L. Y. Huang, G. B. Cai, Dalton Trans., 2013, 42: 7604–7613. DOI:10.1039/c3dt32871f
[39] S. M. Wang, Y. Guan, L. P. Wang, W. Zhao, H. He, J. Xiao, S. G. Yang, C. Sun, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 168-169: 448–457. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.12.047
[40] Z. Liu, X. X. Xu, J. Z. Fang, X. M. Zhu, J. H. Chu, B. J. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2012, 258: 3771–3778. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.12.025
[41] J. Bao, B. Y. Xu, H. L. Lin, B. D. Luo, S. F. Chem. Eng. J., 2012, 185-186: 91–99. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2012.01.035
[42] H. W. Huang, X. Han, X. W. Li, S. C. Wang, P. K. Chu, Y. H. Zhang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7: 482–492. DOI:10.1021/am5065409
[43] X. Q. Yan, K. Ye, T. X. Zhang, C. Xue, D. Zhang, C. S. Ma, J. J. Wei, G. D. Yang, New J. Chem., 2017, 41: 8482–8489. DOI:10.1039/C7NJ01421J
[44] Q. Zhang, Y. Huang, L. F. Xu, J. J. Cao, W. K. Ho, S. C. Lee, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8: 4165–4174. DOI:10.1021/acsami.5b11887
[45] C. Xue, H. An, X. Q. Yan, J. L. Li, B. L. Yang, J. J. Wei, G. D. Yang, Nano Energy, 2017, 39: 513–523. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.07.030
[46] J. C. Wang, H. C. Yao, Z. Y. Fan, L. Zhang, J. S. Wang, S. Q. Zang, Z. J. Li, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8: 3765–3775. DOI:10.1021/acsami.5b09901
[47] J. Wang, L. Zhang, W. X. Fang, J. Ren, Y. Y. Li, H. C. Yao, J. S. Wang, Z. Li, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7: 8631–8639. DOI:10.1021/acsami.5b00822
[48] Y. Bai, P.Q. Wang, J.Y. Liu, X.J. Liu, RSC Adv., 2014, 4: 19456–19461. DOI:10.1039/c4ra01629g