催化学报  2018, Vol. 39 Issue (4): 710-717   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Huazhen Chang
Chuanning Shi
Mingguan Li
Tao Zhang
Chizhong Wang
Lilong Jiang
Xiuyun Wang
The effect of cations (NH4+, Na+, K+, and Ca2+) on chemical deactivation of commercial SCR catalyst by bromides
Huazhen Changa, Chuanning Shia, Mingguan Lia, Tao Zhanga, Chizhong Wangb, Lilong Jiangc, Xiuyun Wangc     
a. School of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China;
b. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control(SKLESPC), School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
c. National Engineering Research Center of Chemical Fertilizer Catalyst, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian, China
* Corresponding author. Huazhen Chang, Tel/Fax: +86-10-62512572; E-mail: chz@ruc.edu.cn
Foundation item: This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (2016YFC0203900, 2016YFC0203901) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (51778619, 21577173)
Abstract: Alkali and alkaline-earth metals from fly ash have a significant deactivation effect on catalysts used for selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3 (NH3-SCR). Bromides are considered effective additives to improve Hg0 oxidation on SCR catalysts. In this work, the effects of different bromides (NH4Br, NaBr, KBr, and CaBr2) on a commercial V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalyst were studied. NOx conversion decreased significantly over the KBr-poisoned catalyst (denoted as L-KBr), while that over NaBr-and CaBr2-poisoned catalysts (denoted as L-NaBr and L-CaBr, respectivity) decreased to a lesser extent compared with the fresh sample. Poor N2 selectivity was observed over L-NaBr, L-KBr and L-CaBr catalysts. The decrease in the ratio of chemisorbed oxygen to total surface oxygen (Oα/(Oα + Oβ + Ow)), reducibility and surface acidity might contribute to the poor activity and N2 selectivity over L-KBr catalyst. The increased Oαratio was conducive to the enhanced reducibility of L-CaBr. Combined with enhanced surface acidity, this might offset the negative effect of the loss of active sites by CaBr2 covering. The overoxidation of NH3 and poor N2 selectivity in NH3 oxidation should retard the SCR activity at high temperatures over L-CaBr catalyst. The increased basicity might contribute to increased NOx adsorption on L-KBr and L-CaBr catalysts. A correlation between the acid-basic and redox properties of bromide-poisoned catalysts and their catalytic properties is established.
© 2018, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Bromide    Cation    Catalyst deactivation    SCR catalyst    N2 selectivity    Surface acidity    
不同阳离子(NH4+, Na+, K+, Ca2+)溴化物对商用SCR催化剂化学中毒影响机制研究
常化振a, 史传宁a, 李明冠a, 张涛a, 王驰中b, 江莉龙c, 王秀云c     
a. 中国人民大学环境学院, 北京 100872;
b. 清华大学环境学院环境模拟与污染控制国家重点联合实验室, 北京 100084;
c. 福州大学化肥催化剂国家工程研究中心, 福建福州 350002
摘要:燃煤飞灰中的碱金属和碱土金属对NH3-SCR催化剂的活性有显著的影响.近年来,研究者针对碱金属/碱土金属氧化物对SCR催化剂中毒作用开展了大量研究.另一方面,研究普遍认为,含溴化合物对提高SCR催化剂汞氧化性能具有明显促进作用.目前为止,针对碱金属/碱土金属溴化物对SCR催化剂影响的系统研究较少.我们课题组系统研究了不同阳离子的溴化物(NH4Br,NaBr,KBr和CaBr2)对商用V2O5-WO3/TiO2催化剂性能的影响. 与未中毒样品相比,KBr中毒后的催化剂(记为L-KBr)上NOx转化率明显下降,而NaBr和CaBr2中毒的催化剂(分别记为L-NaBr和L-CaBr)上的SCR活性也有一定程度的降低.另外L-NaBr,L-KBr和L-CaBr催化剂的N2选择性较差.XPS结果显示,KBr中毒后化学吸附氧(Oα)比例减小;同时,KBr中毒后还原性和表面酸度降低,这些可能是导致L-KBr催化剂的活性和N2选择性变差的主要原因.对于L-CaBr催化剂,中毒后化学吸附氧Oα比例有所增加,这与H2-TPR结果显示可还原性增强一致.O2-TPO结果显示,L-CaBr催化剂可氧化性降低,说明CaBr2中毒还是影响到催化剂表面的氧化还原循环.催化剂CaBr2中毒后表面被覆盖减少了反应活性位数量,但表面酸性的增强可能会抵消活性位点损失带来的负面影响.NH3氧化结果显示,NH3在L-CaBr催化剂表面发生过氧化反应,特别是高温下生成较多N2O,降低N2选择性,这可能是高温下L-CaBr催化剂SCR活性和N2选择性下降的重要原因.CO2-TPD结果表明,L-KBr和L-CaBr催化剂表面碱性强度增加,可能有助于增加NOx物种的吸附量.基于以上活性评价和表征分析结果,我们尝试建立了不同溴化物中毒的催化剂表面酸碱性、氧化还原和催化性能之间的关系.
关键词溴化物    阳离子    催化剂失活    SCR催化剂    N2选择性    表面酸性    

1 Introduction

An important issue in selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3 (NH3-SCR) is the deactivation effects of alkali metals, alkaline-earth metals, and halogens on SCR catalysts [1-5]. Commercial SCR catalysts can be significantly deactivated by alkali and alkaline-earth salts obtained from fly ash. The effects of alkali and alkaline-earth metals on V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalysts have been studied extensively [3, 6-9]. It was believed that the surface acidity of SCR catalysts decreased significantly upon K, Na, and Ca poisoning [4, 8, 10]. Other researchers proposed that suppression of reducibility was more important in the deactivation of V2O5/TiO2 catalysts by Na+ and Ca2+ ions [11]. It was revealed that the strength of the V=O bond was reduced and the oxidizing capability of the V-based catalyst was weakened by loading of alkali metal on the catalyst surface [12]. Du et al. [13] investigated the effect of alkali metal species on SCR catalysts using theoretical and experimental methods, and found that the poisoning effect of Na+ depended on the type of anion used. The SCR catalyst could be also deactivated due to pore blocking by alkali and calcium sulfate deposition [14].

Although the poisoning of SCR catalysts by alkali metals has been extensively researched, there are still many issues to be studied. For instance, the deactivation mechanism of Ca on SCR catalyst is controversial. Yang et al. [15] studied the adsorption of NH3 on CaO and sulfated CaO and found that NH3 could be dissociated to produce NH2 on both the CaO and sulfated CaO catalysts. The intermediate NH2 could then react with surface oxygen to form NO on CaO, and possibly reduce NO over the CaSO4 catalyst. It was reported that the reducibility of vanadium species and the intensity of surface acidity was weakened by CaO and CaCO3, whereas the concentrations of the surface-active oxygen and the Brnsted acid sites were improved by loading of CaSO4 on the SCR catalyst [9]. Furthermore, it should be emphasized that calcium salts have the strongest Lewis acidity among the alkaline-earth metals [16].

Halogens (especially Cl and Br) play important roles in the removal of NOx and Hg0 by SCR catalysts [17]. The addition of calcium bromide to the fuel is believed to be an effective means for oxidizing Hg0 in coal-fired boilers [18]. CaBr2 injection is widely applied to improve Hg0 oxidation and capture in power plants [19-21]. Bromides are thought to donate the most electron density to metals. An increase in electron density at the metal center facilitates oxidative processes [22, 23]. Although the emergence of quantitative acid sites (which are very important in the NH3-SCR reaction) could be observed upon Cl addition, the deactivation effects of Cl on SCR catalysts are serious and irreversible [2, 24]. In spite of these observations, the correlation between bromides and SCR catalysts has been ignored. The effects of bromides on the catalytic performance and structure of SCR catalysts is not clear.

In this study, the commercial V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalyst was poisoned by different bromides (NH4Br, NaBr, KBr and CaBr2). The fresh and poisoned catalysts were studied by means of Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area analysis, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), hydrogen temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR), oxygen temperature-programmed oxidation (O2-TPO), and carbon dioxide temperature-programmed desorption (CO2-TPD), aiming at a better understanding of the effects of bromide-poisoning on the structure and NH3-SCR activity of the commercial SCR system.

2 Experimental
2.1 Catalyst poisoning

The commercial V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalyst (hereafter denoted as L catalyst) was obtained from China Guodian Corporation. The bromide-poisoned catalysts were prepared by impregnating the L catalyst with aqueous solutions of NH4Br, NaBr, KBr and CaBr2 (the mass of loaded bromides was equal). Then the samples were dried at 110 ℃ and calcined at 450 ℃ for 4 h (except for the NH4Br-poisoned sample, because the decomposition temperature of NH4Br is less than 450 ℃). The poisoned samples were denoted as L-NHBr, L-NaBr, L-KBr and L-CaBr, respectively.

2.2 Catalytic performance

The steady-state NH3-SCR performance and NH3 oxidation over the catalysts were evaluated in a fixed-bed quartz reactor. The reaction conditions were as follows: 0.15 g catalyst, 500 ppm NO, 500 ppm NH3, 5% O2, and N2 balance with a total gas flow rate of 200 mL/min, gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) = 7.0 × 104 h–1 (STP). The temperature-programmed desorption of NH3 (NH3-TPD) and NOx (NO + O2-TPD) were also carried out on the same system.

2.3 Catalyst characterization

The BET specific surface area was estimated by N2 physisorption at –196 ℃ using a Quantachrome Nova Automated Gas Sorption System. The XPS spectra were obtained using a PHI-5300/ESCA system. The H2-TPR, O2-TPO and CO2-TPD experiments were accomplished by means of a Micromeritics AutoChem Ⅱ 2920 device. In a typical O2-TPO experiment, about 50 mg of catalyst was used. The catalyst was first pretreated with helium (30 mL/min) at 300 ℃ for 1 h, and then exposed to 500 ppm NH3 at the same temperature for 1 h. After cooling down to room temperature in helium (30 mL/min), the sample was purged by O2 until the baseline was stable. Finally, the sample was heated to 1000 ℃ at a rate of 10 ℃ mL/min in a specific O2 content. The procedures for NH3-TPD, H2-TPR and CO2-TPD were similar to those used in our previous work [2].

3 Results and discussion
3.1 SCR activities over bromide-poisoned catalysts

In order to study the effect of bromides on the SCR catalyst, the commercial L catalyst was sampled and impregnated by four kinds of Br-containing salts (NH4Br, NaBr, KBr, and CaBr2). The effects of bromides on SCR activity are shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. NOx conversion (a) and N2 selectivity (b) vs temperature over fresh and bromide-poisoned commercial SCR catalysts. Reaction conditions: 0.15 g catalysts, 500 ppm NO, 500 ppm NH3, 5% O2, N2 balance, GHSV = 7.0 × 104 h–1

The addition of NH4Br had a negligible effect on SCR activity over the L catalyst. At 400–450 ℃, the NOx conversion over L-NaBr and L-CaBr decreased to a certain extent compared with the fresh sample. However, the NOx conversion decreased significantly over L-KBr catalyst in the test temperature range (especially at high temperature). At 450 ℃, only 24% of NOx conversion could be obtained over the L-KBr catalyst. No change in N2 selectivity was observed over the NH4Br-poisoned catalyst compared to the L catalyst (see Fig. 1(b)). The N2 selectivity at high temperatures decreased over L-NaBr, L-KBr and L-CaBr catalysts. In the case of the L-KBr catalyst, the N2 selectivity was much lower than that of the fresh sample at 450 ℃. This indicated that the poisoning effects of Br-containing salts on the SCR activity were very different due to the various kinds of cations. The results demonstrated that the counter-anions played a crucial role in determining the activity of bromide-poisoned catalysts. For discussing the poisoning effect of bromides on structure and activity, the fresh and poisoned L catalysts were characterized by means of BET, XPS, TPR, and TPD.

3.2 Characterization of physicochemical properties
3.2.1 BET and XPS characterization

The addition of bromides influences the surface physicochemical properties and consequently affects the catalytic activity. The specific BET surface area was tested and the results are shown in Table 1. It is shown that the addition of Br-containing salts had a negligible effect on the specific surface area. The biggest change was found in the L-NHBr sample, where the BET surface area increased to 47.9 m2/g (from 46.0 of m2/g of the L catalyst).

Table 1
The BET specific surface area, surface atomic concentrations and acidity of bromide-poisoned SCR catalysts

Surface-chemisorbed oxygen was believed to be the most active oxygen species, which contributes to excellent SCR activity [3]. XPS analysis was carried out and the results of O 1s analysis of bromide-poisoned samples are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 2. Generally, the O 1s peaks could be fitted into three bands. The sub-band at ~533.2 eV was assigned to H2O on the catalyst surface (hereafter, denoted as Ow) [25]. The sub-band at 531.5–532 eV was attributed to the surface-chemisorbed oxygen (such as O22− pertaining to defect-oxide or hydroxyl oxygen, hereafter, denoted as Oα). The sub-band at ~530.4 eV was attributed to the lattice oxygen O2− (hereafter, denoted as Oβ) [26]. Three kinds of oxygen existed on the fresh L catalyst. Compared with the fresh sample, the Oα/(Oα + Oβ + Ow) ratio increased over the L-CaBr catalyst. The increasing ratio of Oα indicated the formation of new surface-chemisorbed oxygen due to the addition of CaBr2. On the contrary, the ratio decreased over other catalysts, especially the L-NaBr (22.6%) and L-KBr (22.8%) catalysts. The decrease of surface-chemisorbed oxygen might be ascribable to the overlay of active sites by Br-containing salts. The lower ratio of Oα/(Oα + Oβ + Ow) is likely to contribute to poor reducibility and ultimately affect the SCR activity. In the literature, the decrease in the ratio of Oα after impregnation of alkali metals was attributed to the formation of strong bonds between surface oxygen and the doped metal [3]. The order of Oα/(Oα + Oβ + Ow) ratios was as follows: L-CaBr > L > L-NHBr > L-KBr > L-NaBr, and the trend was almost consistent with that of SCR activity. The low concentration of Oα might result in a less reactive oxidation procedure, which would diminish the SCR activity [3].

Fig. 2. O 1s XPS spectra of fresh and bromide-poisoned L catalysts

The oxidation state of vanadium was also acquired and the V 2p XPS spectra for different catalysts are presented in Fig. 3. The presence of two oxidation states (V5+, V4+) for fresh and poisoned catalysts was established by peaks at 517.1–517.6 and 516.4–516.7 eV. V4+ and V5+ appeared on all of catalysts and the main contribution corresponded to V4+ species. The ratios of V4+ / (V4+ + V5+) are listed in Table 1. It is noteworthy that the V4+/(V4+ + V5+) ratio of the L-CaBr and L-NaBr catalysts increased dramatically compared to that of the L catalyst. This revealed that the addition of CaBr and NaBr might alter the electronic density distribution around V. According to literature, the increased amount of V4+ would favor the SCR reaction due to the redox cycle of V5+/V4+ [27]. It was also reported that the formation of V4+ was promoted by fluorine doping due to charge compensation, which enhanced the amount of surface superoxide ions correspondingly [28].

Fig. 3. V 2p XPS spectra of fresh and bromide-poisoned L catalysts
3.2.2 Redox properties

In order to investigate the effect of bromides on the reducibility of L catalyst, H2-TPR was carried out with different catalysts and the resultant profiles are shown in Fig. 4. For the fresh L catalyst, two main broad peaks were found at 586 and 857 ℃, which could be attributed to the reduction of V5+→V3+ and W6+→W0, respectively [3, 7]. The impregnation of NH4Br and CaBr2 enhanced the reducibility of L catalyst and both peaks shifted to lower temperatures, especially for the L-CaBr catalyst, where the two peaks were found at 538 and 773 ℃. The relatively low reduction temperature on L-CaBr is possibly due to the strong interaction between CaBr2 and the catalyst surface. The superior reducibility might be correlated with the high ratio of Oα and V4+ on CaBr2-poisoned catalysts. An improvement in the reducibility on Ca-doped catalyst due to enhanced oxygen mobility was reported by other researchers [29]. It was also reported that the addition of Ca could improve the reducibility of Pt oxides supported on Al2O3 by reducing the Pt-Al interaction [30]. However, it was confirmed that the addition of CaSO4 resulted in more N2O production in the SCR reaction due to its excellent reducibility [9].

Fig. 4. H2-TPR curves of fresh and bromide-poisoned L catalysts

For the L-NaBr and L-KBr catalysts, the peaks ascribed to the reduction of V5+→V3+ and W6+→W0 also appeared but the intensity of all peaks decreased. More importantly, the peaks corresponding to V5+ reduction shifted to higher temperatures, and the peaks ascribed to W6+ reduction shifted to lower temperatures, for both catalysts. Similar changes were also observed after addition of Na and K to V-W/Ti catalysts. Chen et al. [3] attributed this to the diminution in the reduction degree of V species and the influence of the chemical environment around W species by Na, K doping. The TPR results displayed that the reducibility of surface species decreased over L-KBr and L-NaBr catalysts.

According to the literature, regeneration of the V5+=O species could be achieved through two steps, which involve the generation of V4+ and oxidation of the reduced species by gaseous O2 [31]. For the purpose of investigating the redox properties of bromide-poisoned L catalysts, the samples were pretreated in NH3 and followed by the O2-TPO experiment.

As shown in Fig. 5, a small peak at 393 ℃ and a strong peak at 752 ℃ were found on the L catalyst. The low-temperature peak could be attributed to reoxidation of surface V (such as V4+) after NH3 reduction. The peaks shifted to lower temperatures after poisoning by KBr. On the L-CaBr catalyst, a small peak was found at 450 ℃. The reoxidation temperature shifts to a higher value than the corresponding temperature on L catalyst. Thus, the reoxidation of active sites was retarded by CaBr2 addition, which meant that the stability of active sites was improved upon modification. Combining the H2-TPR and O2-TPO data, it could be concluded that the redox properties were affected by addition of bromides. The reducibility of surface V species decreased over L-KBr and L-NaBr catalysts, while the reoxidation ability was retarded on the L-CaBr catalyst. For commercial V-W/Ti catalyst, the redox cycle of V5+ and V4+ (V5+ ↔ V4+) plays an important role in the NH3-SCR reaction. Not only the reducibility, but also the ability of re-oxidation, is important for NH3-SCR. The results indicated that the active sites (such as V5+) might be reduced easily; however, the re-oxidation of V4+ was difficult after CaBr2 addition. This may be an important reason for the lower activity of these catalysts.

Fig. 5. O2-TPO curves of fresh and bromide-poisoned catalysts after pretreatment by NH3
3.3 NH3 and NO adsorption

One of the most significant steps in the NH3-SCR reaction is the NH3 adsorption on the surface acid sites of the catalysts. The surface acidity of bromide-poisoned catalysts was characterized by NH3-TPD. As shown in Fig. 6, all curves present a wide NH3 desorption peak at 150 – 350 ℃. After poisoning by CaBr2, the peak shifted to a higher temperature and the amount of desorbed NH3 increased significantly compared to that of fresh L sample. This indicated the appearance of new acid sites and enhancement of the surface acidity of L-CaBr catalyst. The amounts of desorbed NH3 were calculated from NH3-TPD and the results are displayed in Table 1. The capacity of L-CaBr for NH3 adsorption was about 1.5-times that of the fresh L sample. For the L-NHBr and L-NaBr-loaded catalysts, the amount of desorbed NH3 decreased at different degrees compared to that of the fresh L catalyst. It is worth noting that the amount of desorbed NH3 was much lower over L-KBr catalyst (~39% of acidity of L catalyst), and the peak shifted to lower temperatures, which demonstrated that the surface acidity was weakened by KBr [3]. In the literature, alkali poisoning was studied by a density functional theory-based approach and the results indicated that the decrease in surface acidity is due to electron transfer from the K atom to the terminal O atom [7]. These results reveal that the adsorption of NH3 on SCR catalyst is facilitated after CaBr2 poisoning, while the NH3 adsorption is restrained on other catalysts. However, strong acidity might affect selective catalytic oxidation of NH3 over L-CaBr catalyst. This will be discussed later.

Fig. 6. NH3-TPD curves of fresh and bromide-poisoned L catalysts

Meanwhile, the NO adsorption capacity of bromide-poisoned catalysts was characterized by NO + O2-TPD and the results are also displayed in Table 2 and Fig. 7. It is shown that small amounts of NO and NO2 were desorbed on the L catalyst (2.00 μmol/g of NO, 3.24 μmol/g of NO2). For the L-CaBr catalyst, both NO and NO2 could be found and the amount of NO2 increased to 4.60 μmol/g. However, for the L-KBr catalyst, NO2 could hardly be detected in the test temperature range. The formation of NO2 was related to the surface oxidized species after NO adsorption. As indicated in H2-TPR, the reducibility of surface species decreased over L-KBr catalyst. The oxidation of NO adsorbed species would be affected by this catalyst.

Table 2
NOx adsorption capacities of Br-poisoned SCR catalysts from NO + O2-TPD
Fig. 7. NO + O2-TPD curves of fresh, and KBr-and CaBr2-poisoned L catalysts (NO concentration not shown here)
3.4 NH3 oxidation performance

The quantity of adsorbed NH3 on the surface is related to the surface acidity, and the H-abstraction degree of NH3(ads) is related to the redox properties of SCR catalysts [32]. The catalytic oxidation of NH3 plays an important role in the NH3-SCR reaction. In order to discuss the effect of bromide-poisoning on SCR performance, the NH3 oxidation performance was tested over these catalysts and the results are displayed in Fig. 8. The fresh and bromide-poisoned catalysts exhibited nearly no NH3 conversion at temperatures lower than 300 ℃. On the fresh L catalyst, the NH3 conversion rapidly increased to 48% as the temperature increasing to 450 ℃. The NH3 oxidation performance was improved over L-CaBr catalyst and the NH3 conversion increased to 58% at 450 ℃. The addition of NH4Br showed positive effects on NH3 oxidation and the NH3 conversion increased at high temperatures over L-NHBr catalyst, whereas the oxidation of NH3 was restrained over L-KBr catalyst, which was in agreement with the SCR activity at high temperatures.

Fig. 8. NH3 conversion (a) and N2 selectivity (b) vs temperature over fresh and bromide-poisoned catalysts in NH3 oxidation test. Reaction conditions: 0.15 g catalyst samples, 500 ppm NH3, 5% O2, N2 balance, GHSV = 7.0 × 104 h–1

With respect to the selectivity toward N2, KBr and CaBr2 poisoning showed negative effects on the NH3 oxidation reaction (see Fig. 8(b)). For L-CaBr catalyst, the strong interaction between NH3 and surface acid sites might affect the selective catalytic oxidation of NH3. The adsorbed NH3 species, either in the protonated NH4+ form or in the coordinated NH3 form, would be partly oxidized by the adsorption sites first [32]. The decrease in N2 selectivity was possible owing to overoxidation of NH3 at high temperatures, which is believed to be one important reason for the decline of activity in NH3-SCR.

3.5 Surface basicity

CO2-TPD was performed to characterize the surface basicity of fresh and bromide-poisoned L catalysts. The intensity and distribution of surface basic sites could be characterized by the desorption temperature and the amount of CO2. The CO2-TPD profiles are shown in Fig. 9.

Fig. 9. CO2-TPD curves of fresh and bromide-poisoned L catalysts

The peaks at lower temperature (located in the range of 450–600 ℃) are assigned to –OH basic sites on the catalysts [2]. The peaks at higher temperature (located in the range of 650–850 ℃) could be assigned to basic O2– attached to metal ions, which exhibited a strong interaction with CO2 [2]. The fresh L catalyst exhibited two desorption peaks in the test temperature range. The peaks could be assigned to –OH basic sites (at 463 ℃) and strong basic sites O2– (at 745 ℃). The strength of the basic sites could be reflected by the desorption temperatures of CO2 [33]. After bromide poisoning, the peaks assigned to –OH basic sites shifted to higher temperatures, suggesting that the intensity of –OH basic sites increased. The halogens are the most electronegative elements. The bromides are supposed to donate the most electron density to the metal [22]. Besides, the Na+, K+, and Ca2+ cations might enhance the electron donation effects on the surface. This might be an important reason for the enhancement of surface basicity of bromide-poisoned catalysts. For the L-KBr catalyst, a new peak appeared at 588 ℃, which implied that an additional basic site might be produced after loading of KBr. It was reported that the surface basicity could be proved by the binding energy (BE) of O1s in the XPS spectra [34]. In this work, the BE value of O 1s decreased to 530.3 on L-NaBr catalyst, indicating that the surface basicity was improved.

The enhancement of surface basicity might affect the adsorption of NH3 over L-KBr and L-NaBr catalysts. This was in agreement with NH3-TPD results. The enhancement of basicity should also affect the interaction between NO adsorbed species (such as NO2 and NO3) and the catalyst surface. From NO + O2-TPD, it could be seen that the desorption temperatures of NO increased on the L-KBr catalyst. This demonstrated that the stability of NO adsorbed species was improved. Meanwhile, the amount of adsorbed NO on L-KBr catalyst, and the amount of adsorbed NO2 on L-CaBr catalyst both increased. The strengthening of basicity by KBr and CaBr2 was an important factor. On the other hand, the redox property was suppressed significantly on L-KBr catalyst. Thus, the NH3-SCR catalytic activity decreased, even though more NO could be adsorbed on this catalyst.

4 Conclusions

In summary, the SCR activity of a commercial catalyst was affected significantly by bromide poisoning. The counter-anions played a crucial role in determining the activity of bromide-poisoned catalysts. The decrease in the ratio of surface chemisorbed oxygen, reducibility, surface acidity, and amount of adsorbed NOx contributed to the poor activity and N2 selectivity over the KBr-poisoned catalyst. The inhibition of reoxidation ability, overoxidation of NH3 and poor N2 selectivity in NH3 oxidation retards the SCR activity at high temperature over L-CaBr catalyst. Additional in situ work to investigate the structure-activity relationships over bromide-poisoned catalysts is being carried out in our lab.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Lu from China Guodian Corporation for providing the commercial V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalyst. We appreciate the support from Beijing Engineering Research Center of Biogas Centralized Utilization.

References
[1] J. H. Li, Y. Peng, H. Z. Chang, X. Li, J. C. Crittenden, J. M. Hao, Fron. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10: 413–427. DOI:10.1007/s11783-016-0832-3
[2] H. Z. Chang, J. H. Li, W. K. Su, Y. K. Shao, J. M. Hao, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50: 10031–10034. DOI:10.1039/C4CC02991G
[3] L. Chen, J. H. Li, M. F. Ge, Chem. Eng. J., 2011, 170: 531–537. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2010.11.020
[4] L. Lisi, G. Lasorella, S. Malloggi, G. Russo, Appl. Catal. B, 2004, 50: 251–258. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.01.007
[5] Z. W. Huang, X. Gu, W. Wen, P. P. Hu, M. Makkee, H. Lin, F. Kapteijn, X. F. Tang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52: 660–664. DOI:10.1002/anie.201205808
[6] D. Nicosia, I. Czekaj, O. Kröcher, Appl. Catal. B, 2008, 77: 228–236. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.07.032
[7] Y. Peng, J. H. Li, W. B. Shi, J. Y. Xu, J. M. Hao, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2012, 46: 12623–12629. DOI:10.1021/es302857a
[8] Y. Peng, J. H. Li, X. Huang, X. Li, W. K. Su, X. X. Sun, D. Wang, J. M. Hao, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2014, 48: 4515–4520. DOI:10.1021/es405602a
[9] X. Li, X. S. Li, R. T. Yang, J.S. Mo, J. H. Li, J. M. Hao, Mol. Catal., 2017, 434: 16–24. DOI:10.1016/j.mcat.2017.01.010
[10] D. Nicosia, M. Elsener, O. Kröcher, P. Jansohn, Top. Catal., 2007, 42-43: 333–336. DOI:10.1007/s11244-007-0200-4
[11] F. S. Tang, B. L. Xu, H. H. Shi, J. Qiu, Y. N. Fan, Appl. Catal. B, 2010, 94: 71–76. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.10.022
[12] J. Due-Hansen, S. Boghosian, A. Kustov, P. Fristrup, G. Tsilomelekis, K. Stahl, C. H. Christensen, R. Fehrmann, J. Catal., 2007, 251: 459–473. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2007.07.016
[13] X. S. Du, G. P. Yang, Y. R. Chen, J. Y. Ran, L. Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 392: 162–168. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.036
[14] J. R. Strege, C. J. Zygarlicke, B. C. Folkedahl, D. P. McCollor, Fuel, 2008, 87: 1341–1347. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2007.06.017
[15] X. F. Yang, B. Zhao, Y. Q. Zhuo, Y. Gao, C. H. Chen, X. C. Xu. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2011, 45: 1147–1151. DOI:10.1021/es103075p
[16] Y. Yamashita, T. Tsubogo, S. Kobayashi, Chem. Sci., 2012, 3: 967–975. DOI:10.1039/C1SC00744K
[17] Z. Qu, N. Q. Yan, P. Liu, Y. Chi, J. P. Jia, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2009, 43: 8610–8615. DOI:10.1021/es901803s
[18] M. Rini, B. Vosteen, Mod, Power Syst., 2009, 29: 13-13-13-14–18.
[19] J. D. Sauer, G. W. Cook, T. J. Hall, WO2008106346A2, 2008.
[20] C. J. Nalepa, Q. H. Zhou, C, WO2013009983A1, 2013.
[21] T. J. Feeley, A. P. Jones, L. A. Brickett, B. A. O'Palko, C. E. Miller, J.T. Murphy, Fuel Process. Technol., 2009, 90: 1388–1391. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.05.012
[22] K. Fagnou, M. Lautens, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2002, 41: 26–47. DOI:10.1002/1521-3773(20020104)41:1<>1.0.CO;2-5
[23] R. C. Anderson, J. A. Lasater, D. Lippmann, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1949, 71: 2577–2578. DOI:10.1021/ja01175a502
[24] L. Deng, X. Liu, P. Q. Cao, Y. G. Zhao, Y. B. Du, C. A. Wang, D. F. Che, J. Energy Inst., 2017, 90: 743–751. DOI:10.1016/j.joei.2016.07.003
[25] C. He, B. Shen, J. Chen, J. Cai. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2014, 48: 7891–7898. DOI:10.1021/es5007719
[26] H. Z. Chang, X. Y. Chen, J. H. Li, L. Ma, C. Z. Wang, C. X. Liu, J. W. Schwank, J. M. Hao. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 47: 5294–5301. DOI:10.1021/es304732h
[27] Q. Li, X. X. Hou, H. S. Yang, Z. X. Ma, J. W. Zheng, F. Liu, X. Zhang, Z. Yuan, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2012, 356: 121–127. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2012.01.004
[28] Y. T. Li, Q. Zhong, J. Hazard. Mater., 2009, 172: 635–640. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.039
[29] M. Kang, X. M. Wu, J. Zhang, N. Zhao, W. Wei, Y. H. Sun. RSC Adv., 2014, 4: 5583–5590. DOI:10.1039/c3ra45595e
[30] L. L. Long, W. Z. Lang, X. Liu, C. L. Hu, L. F. Chu, Y. J. Guo, Che. Eng. J., 2014, 257: 209–217. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.044
[31] T. Boningari, R. Koirala, P. G. Srnirniotis, Appl. Catal. B, 2013, 140-141: 289–298. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.04.033
[32] Q. Y. Liu, Z. Y. Liu, C. Y. Li, Chin J. Catal., 2006, 27: 636–646. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(06)60035-1
[33] W. Z. Li, Z. K. Zhao, Y. H. Jiao, G. R. Wang, Chin J. Catal., 2016, 37: 2122–2133. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62540-8
[34] H. Hattori, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95: 537–558. DOI:10.1021/cr00035a005