催化学报  2018, Vol. 39 Issue (4): 771-778   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Yexuan Wen
Shuang Cao
Xiaoqi Fei
Haiqiang Wang
Zhongbiao Wu
One-step synthesized SO42--TiO2 with exposed (001) facets and its application in selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3
Yexuan Wena,b, Shuang Caoa,b, Xiaoqi Feia,b, Haiqiang Wanga,b, Zhongbiao Wua,b     
a. Key Laboratory of Environment Remediation and Ecological Health of Ministry of Education, College of Environmental & Resources Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China;
b. Zhejiang Provincial Engineering Research Center of Industrial Boiler & Furnace Flue Gas Pollution Control, Hangzhou 310027, Zhejiang, China
* Corresponding author. Haiqiang Wang, Tel/Fax: +86-571-87953088; E-mail: haiqiangwang@zju.edu.cn
Foundation item: This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (2016YFC0204100), the Zhejiang Provincial "151" Talents Program, the Program for Zhejiang Leading Team of S & T Innovation (2013TD07), and the Changjiang Scholar Incentive Program (2009)
Abstract: A sample of sulfated anatase TiO2 with high-energy (001) facets (TiO2-001) was prepared by a simple one-step hydrothermal route using SO42- as a morphology-controlling agent. After doping ceria, Ce/TiO2-001 was used as the catalyst for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO with NH3. Compared with Ce/P25 (Degussa P25 TiO2) and Ce/P25-S (sulfated P25) catalysts, Ce/TiO2-001 was more suitable for medium-and high-temperature SCR of NO due to the high surface area, sulfation, and the excellent properties of the active-energy (001) facets. All of these facilitated the generation of abundant acidity, chemisorbed oxygen, and activated NOx-adsorption species, which were the important factors for the SCR reaction.
© 2018, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Anatase TiO2    Sulfation    (001) facets    Ceria    Selective catalytic reduction    
一步水热法合成具有(001)高能晶面的SO42--TiO2及其NH3-SCR脱硝性能
文叶轩a,b, 曹爽a,b, 费晓琦a,b, 王海强a,b, 吴忠标a,b     
a. 浙江大学环境与资源学院污染环境修复与生态健康教育部重点实验室, 浙江杭州 310058;
b. 浙江省工业锅炉炉窑烟气污染控制工程技术研究中心, 浙江杭州 310027
摘要:氮氧化物(NOx)是当今大气环境中的主要污染物之一,氨法选择性催化脱硝技术(NH3-SCR)是最有前景的烟气脱硝技术之一.在众多的NH3-SCR催化剂中,钛基催化剂由于其较好的热稳定性、抗硫性和环境友好性成为近年来研究的热点. 本文以SO42-离子作为晶面导向剂,采用一步水热法合成了具有(001)高能晶面的SO42--TiO2,负载氧化铈后用于SCR反应,并以Ce/P25和Ce/P25-S(浸渍法硫酸化)作为参照对比.研究发现,Ce/TiO2-001更适合于中、高温NH3-SCR反应,在290℃时NO转化率已达99%,并且在290-480℃范围内均保持99%的脱硝效率. 利用X射线衍射、N2吸附脱附、透射电子显微镜、X射线光电子能谱(XPS)、NH3/O2程序升温脱附(TPD)、傅里叶原位红外光谱等技术研究了上述催化剂的表面物化性质与脱硝性能的关系.相比于Ce/P25和Ce/P25-S,Ce/TiO2-001具有更高的比表面积(107m2/g),形成了介孔TiO2单晶,且晶粒尺寸更小.XPS和NH3-TPD结果表明,Ce/TiO2-001表面具有丰富的酸性位.硫酸化可以增加催化剂表面的Brönsted/Lewis酸性位;同时,(001)高能晶面有利于水分子的解离,从而促进酸性位的产生.O2-TPD表明,Ce/TiO2-001催化剂表面存在大量化学吸附氧,这与其一步合成中的硫酸化和(001)高能晶面密切相关,而化学吸附氧在中高温SCR反应中起着重要的作用. 通过原位红外分析可得,不同催化剂表面所形成的NOx吸附物种有所差异,在30℃时,Ce/P25的NOx吸附物种比较丰富,存在气相NO2、双齿硝酸盐、线性硝酸盐、单齿硝酸盐和桥式硝酸盐,而Ce/P25-S和Ce/TiO2-001上的NOx吸附物种则以单齿硝酸盐/亚硝酸盐为主.随着温度的升高,以上催化剂表面的NOx吸附物种逐渐变为以气相NO2和双齿硝酸盐为主.但同种NOx吸附物种(气相NO2、双齿硝酸盐)在不同催化剂上的反应活性也有所不同,在250℃时,其顺序为:Ce/TiO2-001 > Ce/P25-S > Ce/P25,与脱硝性能相符.由此可推测,催化剂表面硫酸化和(001)高能晶面的存在有利于提高NOx中间产物的反应活性,增加反应速率,从而提高脱硝性能. 综上所述,硫酸化、高比表面积和(001)高能晶面是Ce/TiO2-001具有很好脱硝活性的重要原因.硫酸化可以提供丰富的酸性位,增强氨的吸附性能;高比表面积不仅可以负载更多的活性组分,而且有利于活性组分的均匀分散,对降低活性中心的尺寸、防止活性组分烧结团聚有积极作用.而(001)高能晶面则可以促进中、强酸和化学吸附氧的形成,活化NOx吸附物种,从而提高SCR催化活性.
关键词锐钛矿TiO2    硫酸化    (001)晶面        选择性催化还原    

1 Introduction

During the past several years, it has been proved that the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) process with NH3 is one of the most prospective methods of removing NOx in flue gases [1]. Among various transition-metal oxides (e.g., V2O5, CuO, Fe2O3, Cr2O3, MnOx, etc.) [2-7], titania-based catalysts have been considered the most suitable catalysts for widespread SCR application due to their thermal stability and better resistance to sulfur dioxide poisoning [8, 9]. Recently, TiO2 doped with ceria has attracted significant attention because of its excellent SCR catalytic performance and environmentally friendly properties [10-12].

At present, many researchers have focused on the anatase TiO2 micro/nanostructures with (001) high-energy facets, and their applications in many fields, such as catalysts, photocatalysts, catalyst supports, sensors, photoanodes, etc. [13-18]. The TiO2 (001) surface exposed all coordinatively unsaturated atoms five-fold Ti (5c-Ti), and this particular surface structure gave rise to an abundant oxygen deficiency and favors the dissociative adsorption for water and other molecules [19, 20]. Moreover, other researchers reported that the reactive oxygen atoms on the (001) facets played an important role in high photocatalytic selectivity [21]. It has been reported that TiO2-NS with (001) facets showed much better catalytic performance in many cases than TiO2-NP with (101) facets due to the more active sites and higher active energy. Liu et al. [22] investigated that, upon altering the ratio of (001), (101), and (010) facets, the photocatalytic reactivity would be correspondingly changed. Furthermore, Deng et al. [23] studied that manganese oxide doped on an anatase TiO2 with (001) high-energy facets could promote the SCR process. Shi et al. [24] studied that octahedral vanadia species was the dominant species on TiO2 (001) and was very active, while the tetrahedral vanadia species was prone to form on TiO2 (101) and was inactive.

For restraining the growth of the stable (101) facets, some capping agents could be chosen to cause an exceptional stabilization of the (001) facets in anatase TiO2 crystals, for instance, HF and SO42- [18]. It is well known that SO42- species was a very promising promoter of the high reactivity of the SCR reaction without by-products, especially for sulfated TiO2 [25]. The introduction of sulfation could generate surface acidity, which leads to the enhancement of adsorption and activation of ammonia at high temperature [26]. Moreover, sulfation improves the redox properties of vanadate at the surface because of the strong electronic interaction between vanadia and sulfates on the sulfated V/TiO2 catalysts [27]. In addition, it was also reported that catalytic activity was significantly affected by the different sulfation preparation methods [28]. Compared with CeO2-S prepared by precipitation methods, the sulfated-CeO2 prepared by a hydrothermal method with cerium(IV) sulfate as a precursor showed excellent SCR activity and high N2 selectivity due to the intimate binding between sulfate species and Ce4+ [29].

In conclusion, until now, less attention has been paid to the influence of TiO2 with high-energy (001) facets on catalytic performance, especially for the influence of sulfated TiO2 with (001) facets. In this paper, sulfated titanium with exposed (001) facets was prepared by a simple one-step hydrothermal route using SO42- as a morphology-controlling agent. After doping with ceria, Ce/TiO2-001 was used as the catalyst for NH3-SCR of NO, and its catalytic performance was tested. Meanwhile P25 and P25-S (prepared by another sulfation method, i.e., precipitation) were available as a reference. Furthermore, these catalysts were characterized by using various physico-chemical techniques, such as Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) methods, X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), temperature programmed desorption (TPD), in situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier-transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS), etc., to discuss the relationship between the surface chemical properties and catalytic performance.

2 Experimental
2.1 Catalyst preparation

The precursors, containing TiOSO4 (15 wt% solution in dilute sulfuric acid, Sigma Aldrich, USA) and tert-butyl alcohol (molar ratio 1:165), were placed in autoclave at 110 ℃ for 48 h [30]. The products were filtered and washed with distilled water and ethanol. After being dried and calcined, the required TiO2 was prepared, and denoted TiO2-001.

The other nanoparticle TiO2 supports used in the present study were commercial P25 and P25-S. To obtain the sulfated P25, the P25 powder was added to the calculated H2SO4 solution (0.0625 mol/L) and stirred. The obtained solids were then dried and calcined.

The introduction of ceria (Ce/Ti molar ratio 1:19) into the supports was conducted by impregnating the titanium support with the required amount of cerium nitrate solution and the mixture stirred for 6 h, and then dried and calcined to give the final metal-oxide-loaded catalysts for further analysis and examination. The catalysts were designated Ce/TiO2-001, Ce/P25, and Ce/P25-S.

2.2 Catalyst characterization

The crystal phases of the samples were analyzed using an X-ray diffractometer (X'Pert3 Powder, PANalytical B.V., The Netherlands). XPS with Al Kα X-ray ( = 1486.6 eV) radiation operated at 150 W (Thermo ESCALAB 250, USA) was used to investigate the surface properties. The morphology, structure, and grain size of the samples were examined by TEM (FEI F20, ThermoFisher, USA). Specific surface areas were determined by the BET methods on a nitrogen-adsorption apparatus (ASAP 2020, Micromeritics, Inc., USA). NH3-TPD and O2-TPD experiments were carried out on a custom-made thermal conductivity detector (TCD) setup using 100-mg catalysts. Prior to the experiments, catalysts were pre-treated in pure He at 400 ℃ for 1 h. For NH3-TPD experiments, catalysts were saturated with anhydrous NH3 (4% in He) at a flow rate of 30 mL/min for approximately 30 min. For O2-TPD experiments, catalysts were saturated with anhydrous O2 (4% in He) at a flow rate of 30 mL/min at 350 ℃ for approximately 30 min. Desorption of NH3 or O2 was carried out by heating the catalyst in He (50 mL/min) with a heating rate of 10 ℃/min.

2.3 In situ DRIFTS experiments

In situ DRIFTS spectra were measured on a Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (TENSOR 27, Bruker Corp., USA) with a mercury-cadmium-telluride (MCT) detector. Prior to each experiment, the sample was pretreated at 450 ℃ in a flow of He for 60 min and cooled to target temperature to obtain the background spectra. All spectra were recorded from 4000 to 600 cm-1 by accumulating 64 scans with a resolution of 4 cm-1.

For the desorption of NO+O2 as a function of temperature, the catalysts were saturated by absorbed-NOx species under a flow of 1000 ppm NO+3% O2 at 30 ℃. The desorption process DRIFT spectra were then collected from 30 to 350 ℃ under a He flow. Then, in situ DRIFTS were recorded as a function of time at the reaction temperature of 250 ℃, the catalysts were exposed to a flow of 1000 ppm NO+3% O2 for 60 min, and the reaction process was recorded at different periods with a flow of 1000 ppm NH3.

2.4 SCR activity measurements

SCR activity measurements were carried out in a fixed-bed reactor at 80–550 ℃ containing 0.5 g catalyst with a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 100 000 h-1. The typical reactant gas composition was as follows: 600 ppm NO, 600 ppm NH3, 3.5% O2, and balance N2. NO, NO2, and O2 concentrations were monitored by a flue-gas analyzer (Testo 335, Testo, Inc., USA).

3 Results and discussion
3.1 Morphology and structure investigation

Based on the XRD patterns shown in Fig. 1, it was confirmed that all of the identified peaks could be perfectly indexed to anatase TiO2 (JCPDS Card No. 21-1272) for TiO2-001. The three strong peaks at 2θ= 25.3°, 37.8°, and 48.1° were attributed to anatase (101), (004), and (200) diffractions, respectively. P25 was a mixed-phased TiO2 containing anatase and rutile phases. Few changes have been observed for the sample P25-S, except for the weaker intensity of the diffraction peaks, which indicated that sulfation had little influence on crystal-phase transformation. In addition, for TiO2-001, the intensity of the diffraction peaks was much weaker and broader than that of P25, suggesting that the synthesized TiO2 with exposed (001) facets had smaller crystal size. In addition, no diffraction peaks of cerium oxide were found on the catalysts Ce/TiO2-001, Ce/P25-S, and Ce/P25, which might be due to good dispersion of cerium oxide on the supports.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of prepared catalysts

From Table 1 and Fig. 2(a), it is obvious that P25 consists of mixed-phased nanoparticles with a surface area of 52.4 m2/g and an average diameter of 20 nm, matching the XRD definition. For P25-S, the average pore size and pore volume increased, and the BET surface areas decreased due to sulfation, but the influence was slight.

Table 1
Physical properties of prepared samples
Fig. 2. TEM and HRTEM images of P25 (a) and TiO2-001 (b)

Because of the difference in the preparation method, the sample TiO2-001 exerted a significant change on the structure and BET surface areas. The low-magnification TEM (left-hand inset of Fig. 2(b)) and nitrogen adsorption-desorption experience (Fig. 3 and Table 1) demonstrates the formation of mesoporous TiO2 single crystals with a high surface area of 107 m2/g and a uniform pore diameter of 4.9 nm. From the high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images in Fig. 2(b), it was found that a perpendicular lattice spacing of 0.19 nm was consistent with the (200) and (020) atomic planes of the anatase TiO2. The corresponding selected-area electron-diffraction (SAED) pattern (right-hand inset of Fig. 2(b)) further confirms that the exposed crystal facet was a (001) facet. This is because of the addition of H2SO4 in the precursor solutions [30].

Fig. 3. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms of samples
3.2 Elemental analysis

The XPS spectra of S 2p, Ce 3d, and O 1s levels are displayed in Fig. 4. The binding energies of S 2p for the catalysts Ce/TiO2-001 and Ce/P25-S were 168.6 and 168.2 eV, which suggested the presence of S6+ and S existing as sulfate [25]. From Table 2, it was found that the surface sulfate content for both catalysts was similar to each other.

Fig. 4. XPS spectra of catalysts. (a) S 2p; (b) Ce 3d; (c) O 1s
Table 2
Surface composition of catalysts

The XPS spectra of Ce 3d of all catalysts are shown in Fig. 4(b). The peaks at 916.4, 905.0, 900.0, 896.3, 886.3, and 882.7 eV correspond to the Ce4+ species, while those at 904, 898, 885.1, and 879.1 eV correspond to the Ce3+ species [31, 32]. The curve fittings in the XPS peaks of Ce 3d demonstrate that Ce existed as a mixture of Ce4+ and Ce3+. Incorporating XRD investigations confirms that the cerium existed well dispersed on catalysts as an amorphous nature of CeO2 and Ce2O3 for the three catalysts. For the sulfated catalysts Ce/TiO2-001 and Ce/P25-S, the peaks at binding energies of 885.1, 898, and 904 eV increased compared with Ce/P25, which contributed to the binding energy of Ce3+. Thus, it could be seen that sulfation was beneficial to the formation of Ce3+. It was reported that Ce3+ species could lead to the increase of chemisorbed oxygen on the surface, which was very active and played an important role in the reaction [10].

The XPS spectra for O 1s show that there are three peaks for the samples, which could be attributed to Oγ type (527.0–531.5 eV, lattice oxygen), Oβ type (529.0–533.0 eV, chemisorbed oxygen) oxygen, and Oα type (530.7–534.7 eV, physically absorption oxygen) on the catalyst surface [11]. As shown in Fig. 4(c) and Table 2, compared with Ce/P25, the Oα concentration of Ce/TiO2-001 and Ce/P25-S decreased slightly, but that of Oβ type increased, which indicates the increase of chemisorbed oxygen. These results are in accord with the status of Ce3+ in Fig. 4(b).

3.3 TPD results

In Fig. 5, the feature of NH3 desorption of Ce/TiO2-001 was quite different from Ce/P25 and the surface-sulfated Ce/P25-S. From 130 to 500 ℃, a wide and large ammonia adsorption peak was observed along with a maximum at 300 ℃, suggesting that the Ce/TiO2-001 catalyst was composed of abundant weak, medium, and strong acid sites, especially the strong ones.

Fig. 5. NH3-TPD profiles for Ce/P25, Ce/P25-S, and Ce/TiO2-001

First, for Ce/TiO2-001, the number of total acid sites might be relative to the sulfation and the high surface area, which could carry more acid sites. Sulfation could create abundant Brönsted/Lewis acid sites and strengthen the acidity [33]. However, as we know, half-fivefold-(5c-Ti) and half-sixfold-(6c-Ti) coordinated Ti atoms were present on the (101) ideal surface, while only 5c-Ti atoms were present on the (001) surface. Therefore, the water molecules were energetically favored to be dissociated on the (001) facets compared with (101) facets [20]. Consequently, more hydroxyls were terminally bonded to adjacent Ti sites and favored the formation of acid sites, especially for the medium-and high-strength acid sites. Therefore, it could be concluded that the TiO2 with exposed (001) facets might affect the type of acid sites for the catalyst Ce/TiO2-001.

TPD of O2 is a direct method of measuring the oxygen species. As we know, the peak at 200–600 ℃ is due to chemisorbed oxygen, which plays an important role for medium-and high-temperature SCR performance [8]. From Fig. 6, the amount of chemisorbed oxygen increased successively as follows: Ce/P25 < Ce/P25-S < Ce/TiO2-001. The reasons are twofold. First, the sulfation favored the generation of Ce3+, which was close to the chemisorbed oxygen, already mentioned above. Second, high-energy (001) facets played an important role. The surfaces of the (001) facets were composed of a high density of under-coordinated Ti atoms and very large Ti-O-Ti bond angles, resulting in abundant oxygen deficiency. In addition, the surface twofold-coordinated O (O2c) atoms on (001) facets were quite different from the state of O2c atoms on (101) facets and were very active [19, 21].

Fig. 6. O2-TPD profiles for Ce/P25, Ce/P25-S, and Ce/TiO2-001
3.4 In situ DRIFT

In situ DRIFTS experiments of NO+O2 desorption were carried out to investigate the formation and transformation of NOx species on the catalyst surface. As shown in Fig. 7(a), the adsorbed NOx species were the gaseous NO2 at 1614 cm-1, the bidentate nitrates at 1581/1548 cm-1, the linear nitrites at 1488 cm-1, the monodentate nitrates at 1290 cm-1, and the bridged nitrates at 1245 cm-1 over Ce/P25 catalyst at 30 ℃ [34-39]. With increasing temperature, the linear nitrites, monodentate nitrates, and bridged nitrates gradually decreased and vanished at 350 ℃, while the gaseous NO2 and bidentate nitrates were still stable and became the dominant species at high temperature.

Fig. 7. In situ DRIFTS spectra of NO+O2 desorption on Ce/P25 (a), Ce/P25-S (b), and Ce/TiO2-001 (c) catalysts

In comparison with the in situ DRIFT spectra of Ce/P25, two obvious differences appeared in the spectra of Ce/P25-S and Ce/TiO2-001 (Figs. 7(b) and 7(c)). (1) The main NOx species were monodentate nitrates and monodentate nitrites on the Ce/P25-S and Ce/TiO2-001 catalysts at 30 ℃, with bands at 1528/1520 cm-1 [35] and 1321/1307 cm-1 [38]. Additionally, the bands at 1633/1650 cm-1 appeared at 30 ℃, but disappeared at temperatures higher than 100 ℃. Yang et al. [40] proposed that this band was to the absorbed H2O. (2) The bands of monodentate nitrates/nitrites became weaker with increasing temperature and disappeared at temperatures higher than 150 ℃. Meanwhile, for the Ce/P25-S catalyst, the gaseous NO2 (1603 cm-1) and bidentate nitrates (1573 cm-1) turned into the dominant species, and could be observed even at 350 ℃. Moreover, the bands at 1398 and 1380 cm-1 assigned to ionic nitrates [36] were also detected at 350 ℃ over Ce/P25-S. In case of Ce/TiO2-001 catalyst, the gaseous NO2 (1610 cm-1) and bidentate nitrates (1575 cm-1) appeared at higher temperature, but only gaseous NO2 was still obvious at 350 ℃. In brief, the evident differences might be related to the acidic properties and the high-energy (001) facet on the catalyst surface.

In order to identity the reactive species in the SCR reactions, the in situ DRIFTS spectra of NH3 reacted with the pre-absorbed NO+O2 species at 250 ℃ as a function of time were studied. As illustrated in Fig. 8(a), the bands at 1602 and 1570/1548 cm-1 attributed to the gaseous NO2 and bidentate nitrates hardly changed with the introduction of NH3 in the first 5 min. Afterwards, the band at 1570 cm-1 shifted to 1558 cm-1 in 10 min. Simultaneously, the bands at 3380/3267/1174 cm-1 started to be observed, which were attributed to the accumulation of NH3 absorbed on the Lewis acid sites [41, 42]. However, the intensity of bands ranging from 1610 to 1500 cm-1 remained and maintained stability longer. Zhan et al. [43] proposed that the bands at 1550 cm-1 may be related to the intermediate of oxidation of ammonia. Then, it could be assumed that the gaseous NO2 and bidentate nitrates were inactive on the Ce/P25 catalyst and not or partially reactive to NH3. They might coexist with the intermediate of oxidation of ammonia.

Fig. 8. In situ DRIFTS spectra of transient reactions at 250 ℃ between NH3 and pre-adsorbed NO+O2 species over Ce/P25 (a), Ce/P25-S (b), and Ce/TiO2-001 (c) catalysts recorded as a function of time

In the case of Ce/P25-S (Fig. 8(b)), the band at 1604 cm-1 ascribed to the gaseous NO2 disappeared in 5 min. In addition, the band ascribed to bidentate nitrates (1573 cm-1) decreased with increasing exposure duration, and then was replaced by the band at 1554 cm-1 originating from the intermediate of oxidation of ammonia.

Fig 8(c), in contrast, indicates that the gaseous NO2 (1612 cm-1) disappeared completely after introducing NH3 for only 1 min. Then, the bands at 3358/3263/1590/1320 and 1678/1445 cm-1 appeared, which were attributed to the accumulation of NH3 absorbed on the Lewis acid sites and Brönsted acid sites, respectively [41, 44-46].

The above results strongly demonstrate that the activity of the same NOx-adsorption species on different catalysts varies widely. The activity of gaseous NO2 and bidentate nitrates over the three catalysts were as follows: Ce/TiO2-001 > Ce/P25-S > Ce/P25. The gaseous NO2 was consumed faster over the Ce/TiO2-001 catalyst than over the other two catalysts, which could be due to the special structure of the high-energy (001) facet of TiO2 and the high concentration of surface chemically absorbed oxygen.

3.5 SCR activity

NO conversions for the prepared catalysts are shown in Fig. 9. It was observed that the catalytic activity of pure P25 was quite low, and the maximum value of NO conversion was only 38% at 525 ℃. After sulfation, the NO conversion reached 85% at 450 ℃ for the sample P25-S, due to the abundant acid sites, while a better activity was obtained for TiO2-001 in the high-temperature range, the NO conversion of which reached up to 99% at 480 ℃ and was maintained above 85% in the range 420–530 ℃.

Fig. 9. NO conversion of catalysts at different temperatures

When introducing ceria, it was clear that a high NO conversion rate was obtained for Ce/TiO2-001, whose maximum value was up to 99% at 290 ℃ and remained in the temperature range 290–480 ℃. It was found that the SCR activity decreased in the following sequence: Ce/TiO2-001>Ce/P25-S>Ce/P25.

Sulfation created abundant acid sites, and the influence of acidity on SCR catalytic performance at high temperature, which played an important role in the adsorption and activation of ammonia at high temperature, was discussed in previous studies [26]. In this paper, according to the NO conversion for the P25-S and TiO2-001 catalysts detailed above, it was further proved that sulfation was directly responsible for the SCR reaction at high temperature.

The high surface area was not only beneficial to the good dispersion of sulfate content and ceria, but could also carry more of these active components, which are crucial for SCR performance. Ceria doped on titania provides redox active sites for oxygen circulation and adsorption/activation of NO [10, 26]. Therefore, it was easy to understand the excellent performance for the catalyst Ce/TiO2-001 with a high surface area 94.2 m2/g, approximately twice as much as that of Ce/P25 and Ce/P25-S.

It was obvious that the (001) facets were also responsible for TiO2-001 catalyst activity, except for the acidity and high surface area, which affected the formation of the medium-and high-strength acid sites, active chemisorbed oxygen, and activated NOx-adsorption species.

In short, the catalytic performance for SCR of NO on the catalyst Ce/TiO2-001 was obviously superior to Ce/P25 and Ce/P25-S because of the high surface area, sulfation, and excellent properties of active-energy (001) facets.

4 Conclusions

For a series of samples, NO reduction activity followed the trend Ce/TiO2-001>Ce/P25-S>Ce/P25. The use of Ce/TiO2-001 revealed an excellent catalytic reaction for the SCR of NO by NH3 at medium and high temperature, which was discussed from three main aspects. First, there was no doubt that high surface area was an important factor influencing its catalytic performance, which facilitated the dispersion and amount of the sulfate SO42- and active-site ceria. Second, sulfation was an important factor that provided abundant acid sites for the good SCR reaction at high temperature and modulated the valence state of ceria. Third, the superior properties of high-energy (001) facets should not be ignored because of the specific surface reconstruction and abundant oxygen deficiency.

References
[1] S. M. Lee, S. S. Kim, S. C. Hong, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2012, 79: 177–185. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2012.05.032
[2] O. Kroecher, M. Elsener, Appl. Catal. B, 2008, 77: 215–227. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.04.021
[3] H. Z. Chang, J. H. Li, X. Y. Chen, L. Ma, S. J. Yang, J. W. Schwank, J. M. Hao, Catal. Commun., 2012, 27: 54–57. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2012.06.022
[4] J. Ochonska, D. McClymont, P. J. Jodlowski, A. Knapik, B. Gil, W. Makowski, W. Lasocha, A. Kolodziej, S. T. Kolaczkowski, J. Lojewska, Catal. Today, 2012, 191: 6–11. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2012.06.010
[5] L. K. Boudali, A. Ghorbel, P. Grange, CR. Chim., 2009, 12: 779–786. DOI:10.1016/j.crci.2008.11.005
[6] G. Ramis, M. A. Larrubia, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2004, 215: 161–167. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2004.01.016
[7] F. Ayari, M. Mhamdi, G. Delahay, A. Ghorbel, J. Porous. Mater., 2010, 17: 265–274. DOI:10.1007/s10934-009-9288-1
[8] Z. Y. An, Y. Q. Zhuo, C. Xu, C. H. Chen, Chin. J. Catal., 2014, 35: 120–126. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(12)60726-8
[9] S. L. Zhang, Q. Zhong, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2013, 373: 108–113. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2013.03.011
[10] S. M. Lee, H. H. Lee, S. C. Hong, Appl. Catal. A, 2014, 470: 189–198. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2013.10.057
[11] T. T. Gu, Y. Liu, X. L. Weng, H. Q. Wang, Z. B. Wu, Catal. Commun., 2010, 12: 310–313. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2010.10.003
[12] H. Q. Wang, X. B. Chen, X. L. Weng, Y. Liu, S. Gao, Z. B. Wu, Catal. Commun., 2011, 12: 1042–1045. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2011.03.005
[13] H. M. Zhang, Y. Wang, P. Liu, Y. H. Han, X. D. Yao, J. Zou, H. M. Cheng, H. J. Zhao, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2011, 3: 2472–2478. DOI:10.1021/am200363p
[14] S. W. Liu, J. G. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23: 4085–4093. DOI:10.1021/cm200597m
[15] X. H. Yang, Z. Li, C. H. Sun, H. G. Yang, C. Z. Li, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23: 3486–3494. DOI:10.1021/cm2008768
[16] J. S. Chen, Y. L. Tan, C. M. Li, Y. L. Cheah, D. Luan, S. Madhavi, F. Y. C. Boey, L. A. Archer, X. W. Lou, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132: 6124–6130. DOI:10.1021/ja100102y
[17] J. G. Yu, J. J. Fan, K. L. Lv, Nanoscale, 2010, 2: 2144–2149. DOI:10.1039/c0nr00427h
[18] H. G. Yang, C. H. Sun, S. Z. Qiao, J. Zou, G. Liu, S. C. Smith, H. M. Cheng, G. Q. Lu, Nature, 2008, 453: 638–642. DOI:10.1038/nature06964
[19] X. Q. Gong, A. Selloni, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109: 19560–19562. DOI:10.1021/jp055311g
[20] A. Vittadini, A. Selloni, F. P. Rotzinger, M. Gratzel, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1998, 81: 2954–2957. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2954
[21] J. Zhang, W. K. Chen, J. H. Xi, Z. G. Ji, Mater. Lett., 2012, 79: 259–262. DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2012.04.045
[22] G. Liu, J. C. Yu, G. Q. Lu, H. M. Cheng, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47: 6763–6783. DOI:10.1039/c1cc10665a
[23] S. C. Deng, T. T. Meng, B. L. Xu, F. Gao, Y. H. Ding, L. Yu, Y. N. Fan, ACS Catal., 2016, 6: 5807–5815. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b01121
[24] Q. Q. Shi, Y. Li, Y. Zhou, S. Miao, N. Ta, E. S. Zhan, J. Y. Liu, W. J. Shen, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3: 14409–14415. DOI:10.1039/C5TA02897C
[25] L. Baraket, A. Ghorbel, P. Grange, Appl. Catal. B, 2007, 72: 37–43. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.10.001
[26] S. M. Jung, P. Grange, Catal. Today, 2000, 59: 305–312. DOI:10.1016/S0920-5861(00)00296-0
[27] H. Y. Zhao, S. Bennici, J. Y. Shen, A. Auroux, J. Catal., 2010, 272: 176–189. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2010.02.028
[28] H. Q. Guo, C. B. Chen, Y. Xiao, J. G. Wang, Z. H. Fan, D. B. Li, Y. H. Sun, Fuel Process. Technol., 2013, 106: 77–83. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.07.004
[29] H. Z. Chang, L. Ma, S. J. Yang, J. H. Li, L. Chen, W. Wang, J. M. Hao, J. Hazard. Mater., 2013, 262: 782–788. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.09.043
[30] Z. F. Bian, J. Zhu, J. Wen, F. L. Cao, Y. N. Huo, X. F. Qian, Y. Cao, M. Q. Shen, H. X. Li, Y. F. Lu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 50: 1105–1108. DOI:10.1002/anie.v50.5
[31] H. He, H. X. Dai, C. T. Au, Catal. Today, 2004, 90: 245–254. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2004.04.033
[32] S. Cao, H. Q. Wang, F. X. Yu, M. P. Shi, S. Chen, X. L. Weng, Y. Liu, Z. B. Wu, J. Colloid. Interf. Sci., 2016, 463: 233–241. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2015.10.061
[33] S. Gao, P. L. Wang, X. B. Chen, H. Q. Wang, Z. B. Wu, Y. Liu, X. L. Weng, Catal. Commun., 2014, 43: 223–226. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2013.10.017
[34] W. S. Hu, Y. H. Zhang, S. J. Liu, C. H. Zheng, X. Gao, I. Nova, E. Tron, - coni, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 206: 449–460. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.036
[35] L. Zhang, L.Y. Shi, L. Huang, J. P. Zhang, R. H. Gao, D. S. Zhang, ACS Catal., 2014, 4: 1753–1763. DOI:10.1021/cs401185c
[36] B. Azambre, I. Atribak, A. Bueno-López, A. García-García, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114: 13300–13312. DOI:10.1021/jp102949r
[37] M. A. Larrubia, G. Ramis, G. Busca, Appl. Catal. B, 2001, 30: 101–110. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(00)00220-4
[38] L. Huang, K. W. Zha, S. Namuangruk, A. Junkaew, X. Zhao, H. R. Li, L. Y. Shi, D. S. Zhang, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6: 8516–8524. DOI:10.1039/C6CY02026G
[39] G. Gao, J. W. Shi, C. Liu, C. Gao, Z. Y. Fan, C. M. Niu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 411: 338–346. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.164
[40] S. J. Yang, Y. W. Fu, Y. Liao, S. C. Xiong, Z. Qu, N. Q. Yan, J. H. Li, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4: 224–232. DOI:10.1039/C3CY00648D
[41] Z. H. Lian, F. D. Liu, H. He, X. Y. Shi, J. S. Mo, Z. B. Wu, Chem. Eng. J, 2014, 250: 390–398. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.065
[42] L. Chen, J. H. Li, M. F. Ge, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2010, 44: 9590–9596. DOI:10.1021/es102692b
[43] S. H. Zhan, M. Y. Qiu, S. S. Yang, D. D. Zhu, H. B. Yu, Y. Li, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2: 20486–20493. DOI:10.1039/C4TA04807E
[44] C. Gao, J. W. Shi, Z. Y. Fan, Y. K. Yu, J. S. Chen, Z. H. Li, C. M. Niu, Fuel Process. Technol., 2017, 167: 322–333. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.07.006
[45] D. Wang, Y. Peng, S. C. Xiong, B. Li, L. N. Gan, C. M. Lu, J. J. Chen, Y. L. Ma, J. H. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 221: 556–564. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.09.045
[46] X. X. Wang, Y. Shi, S. J. Li, W. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 220: 234–250. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.021