催化学报  2018, Vol. 39 Issue (10): 1704-1710   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Xianglin Zhu
Zihan Guan
Peng Wang
Qianqian Zhang
Ying Dai
Baibiao Huang
Amorphous TiO2-modified CuBi2O4 Photocathode with enhanced photoelectrochemical hydrogen production activity
Xianglin Zhua,†, Zihan Guana,†, Peng Wanga, Qianqian Zhanga, Ying Daib, Baibiao Huanga     
a. State Key Laboratory of Crystal Materials, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China;
b. School of Physics, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, Shandong, China
* Corresponding author. Wang Peng, E-mail: pengwangicm@sdu.edu.cn;
Huang Baibiao, E-mail: bbhuang@sdu.edu.cn
These authors contributed equally to this work
Foundation item: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51602179, 21333006, 21573135, 11374190) and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2013CB632401)
Abstract: In this study, CuBi2O4 photocathodes were prepared using a simple electrodeposition method for photoelectrochemical (PEC) hydrogen production. The prepared photocathodes were modified with amorphous TiO2 and a Pt co-catalyst, which resulted in the formation of CuBi2O4/TiO2 p-n heterojunctions, and enhanced the activities of the as-prepared photocathodes. The novel Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathode exhibited a photocurrent of 0.35 mA/cm2 at 0.60 V vs. Reversible Hydrogen Electrode (RHE), which was nearly twice that of the Pt/CuBi2O4 photocathode. The present study provides a facile method for increasing the efficiency of photocathodes and provides meaningful guidance for the preparation of high-performance CuBi2O4 photocathodes.
© 2018, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Photoelectrochemical hydrogen production    CuBi2O4    Amorphous TiO2    p-n heterojunction    Carriers' separation    
非晶TiO2修饰CuBi2O4光阴极增强其光电化学产氢活性
朱相林a,†, 管子涵a,†, 王朋a, 张倩倩a, 戴瑛b, 黄柏标a     
a. 山东大学晶体材料国家重点实验室, 山东济南 250100;
b. 山东大学物理学院, 山东济南 250100
摘要:光催化作为太阳能利用领域的研究热点引起了广泛的关注.其中,光电化学技术能够通过分解水提供清洁的氢能源,因此被认为是一种潜在的新能源制造方式.在光电化学分解水产氢的过程中,最重要的是高效光电极的制备.一系列n型半导体材料已被广泛地报道并用作光阳极,如BiVO4,ZnO,Fe2O3等.然而对于光阴极材料,其可选择性则较少.CuBi2O4是一种天然矿物,具有廉价易得以及化学性质稳定的特性,而且是一种p型半导体材料,因此能够用于制备光阴极;另外因为其强的可见光响应(1.70eV),所以具有广泛的应用前景.目前对于CuBi2O4光阴极研究主要集中在合成和理论计算方面,而对于如何促进界面处的载流子分离研究较少. 本文通过一种简单的电沉积方法成功制备出CuBi2O4光阴极,然后利用非晶TiO2和助催化剂Pt进行修饰后将其用于光电化学产氢.由于形成了CuBi2O4/TiO2 p-n结,因此其光阴极活性得到增强.新的Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4光阴极在0.60V偏压处的光电流为0.35mA/cm2,其数值约为Pt/CuBi2O4光阴极的两倍.XRD结果表明,我们制备的CuBi2O4为纯相且结晶性较好,其表面修饰的TiO2为非晶相的.SEM结果表明,CuBi2O4电极层由100-150nm的颗粒构成.紫外-可见吸收光谱表明,制备的CuBi2O4光电极拥有良好的可见光吸收性质,而且TiO2修饰未对CuBi2O4的光吸收产生明显的影响.XPS结果表明,修饰TiO2并未对CuBi2O4电极造成成分上的破坏.光电化学测试表明,修饰TiO2层厚度和结晶性会影响光电极的最终活性.修饰四层TiO2和退火200℃的样品具有最好的活性. 另外稳定性测试也表明,修饰非晶TiO2的CuBi2O4光阴极具有良好的稳定性.在IPCE测试中,Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4光阴极在其光响应范围内均比Pt/CuBi2O4光阴极表现出更高的效率.阻抗结果测试中Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4光阴极具有更小的阻抗,这表明其载流子传输更加高效.在Mott-Shetty测试中,Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4和Pt/CuBi2O4光阴极都表现出p型半导体性质,但是Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4具有更负的平带电位,这表明修饰的TiO2仍具有n型半导体材料的特性,并与p型的CuBi2O4形成p-n结,从而促进了载流子分离效率.
关键词光电化学产氢    CuBi2O4    非晶TiO2    p-n结    载流子分离    

1 Introduction

Recently, due to increasing energy and environment problems, the development of energy-saving and emission-reducing technology has become urgent. The most efficient method which can solve the current dilemma is the development and implementation of cleaner energy. Solar energy has attracted significant attention for its green, widespread, and inexhaustible characteristics. In recent years, photocatalytic technology has become an increasingly popular research topic due to its capability of converting solar into chemical energy, degrading organic pollutants, and producing organic fuel [1-8]. In the field of photocatalysis, photoelectrochemical (PEC) water-splitting is considered to be a promising solution which could provide enough clean energy and satisfy the increasing energy demands of modern society [11, 12]. The biggest challenge to date for PEC water-splitting is the preparation of highly active photoanodes and photocathodes. Though a large number of n-type semiconductor materials, such as BiVO4, ZnO, and Fe2O3, have been developed for preparing photoanodes [13-15], only a few candidates including p-Si, Cu2O, Cu2ZnSnS4, and CuInxGa1–xSe [16-19] have been reported as p-type semiconductors for photocathodes. However, these materials have some unavoidable problems which limit their applications and include high cost, difficult preparation, and instability. The exploration of photocathode materials is crucial for further developments in the field of PEC water-splitting.

CuBi2O4 is a p-type semiconductor which is naturally stable and exhibits a band gap of approximately 1.70 eV with excellent visible light responses, allowing it to utilize a significant part of light energy [20-23]. The conduction band minimum (CBM) of CuBi2O4 is estimated to be at a more negative potential than the thermodynamic potential for H2 production, and its valence band maximum (VBM) at a more positive potential than that of p-type Si or Cu2O. This appropriate band gap structure makes it a promising photocathode material. Few studies have been reported for PEC hydrogen production using CuBi2O4 photocathodes. However most of them focused on synthetic methods and theoretical calculations [21-23], and not on promoting interfacial carrier separation.

In this study, the p-type CuBi2O4 photocathodes were prepared using a simple electrochemical synthesis method. The CuBi2O4/TiO2 p-n heterojunction was first prepared by spin-coating a TiO2 layer on the surface of the CuBi2O4 photocathodes. The experiment results showed that the activity of the prepared CuBi2O4 photocathode was substantially improved by the formation of the CuBi2O4/TiO2 heterojunction. It is believed that the successful construction of Pt/CuBi2O4/TiO2 will act as a guide for future modification studies of CuBi2O4 photocathodes.

2 Experimental
2.1 Chemicals

All chemicals were of analytical grade and were used without further purification.

2.2 Preparation of the photocathodes

A typical three-electrode system composed of an F-doped Tin Oxide (FTO) working electrode, Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl) reference electrode, and Pt counter electrode was used. Preparation of the Cu/Bi metal film was achieved via electrodeposition in a dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) electrolyte solution containing 20 mmol/L Bi(NO3)3, 10 mmol/L Cu(NO3)2, and 100 mmol/L KClO4. Deposition was performed for 10 cycles at 0.05 C/cm2 (E = –1.5 V vs Ag/AgCl) for each cycle. A total charge of 0.50 C/cm2 was applied. Subsequently, the Cu/Bi films were heated at 500 ℃ for 3 h in air (ramping rate = 3 ℃/min) to form CuBi2O4 [27]. After annealing, the organic residue from DMSO was removed from the surface.

Preparation of Pt/CuBi2O4 photocathodes. Pt was deposited onto the CuBi2O4 films through photoelectrochemical reduction in 20 vol% methanol aqueous solution containing 0.3 mmol/L H2PtCl6. A 300 W Xe arc lamp was used as the light source and was equipped with an AM 1.5G filter. CuBi2O4 photoelectrodes were used as working electrodes. The deposition amount was approximately 0.02 C/cm2 at E = 0 V vs Ag/AgCl.

Deposition of TiO2. The sol-gel precursor was prepared by adding 0.3 mL of isopropyl titanate to 20 mL ethanol under stirring. Subsequently, 250 μL of the precursor was dropped on the CuBi2O4 photoelectrodes for spin-coating (1000 r/min, 30 s) several times and the photoelectrodes were annealed at different temperatures for 1 h.

Preparation of TiO2 powder. The sol-gel precursor was dried in glass beakers and annealed at different temperatures. The preparation of the Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathodes was performed using the same method as that of the Pt/CuBi2O4 photocathodes.

2.3 Characterization of the photocathodes

Morphology observation was performed using an S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Hitachi, Japan). The purity and crystallinity of the CuBi2O4 and TiO2/CuBi2O4 electrodes were examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Bruker AXS D8 ADVANCE diffractometer (Cu Kα X-ray radiation, λ = 0.154056 nm). The light source was a 300 W Xe arc lamp (PLS-SXE 300, Beijing Trusttech Co. Ltd.) equipped with an AM 1.5 filter (100 mW/cm2). UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra were recorded using a Shimadzu UV 2550 spectrophotometer equipped with an integrating sphere, and BaSO4 was used as a reference. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy were got through Thermo Scientific ESCALAB 250.

Photoelectrochemical measurements were performed using an electrochemical analyzer (CHI660C, CH Instruments) with a standard three-electrode system in 0.1 mol/L NaOH electrolyte solution. The reference electrode was Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl), the counter electrode was a Pt plate, and the prepared photocathodes were used as working electrodes.

3 Results and discussion

XRD was used to investigate the phase structure of the samples. Fig. 1 shows the XRD of the CuBi2O4 sample prepared without a spin coated TiO2 layer. The observed diffraction peaks at 20.87°, 28.01°, 29.68°, 30.74°, and 33.26° arose from (200), (211), (220), (002), and (310), respectively which correspond to JCPDS No. 72-493. The obvious peak at approximately 26.4° is characteristic of the FTO substrate. The XRD patterns of the TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathodes treated at different temperatures are shown in Fig. S1 and exhibited no obvious TiO2 peaks.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of the TiO2/CuBi2O4 sample.

To clarify the status of the TiO2 on CuBi2O4, we prepared TiO2 using the same sol-gel precursor under different temperature heat treatment conditions, as shown in Fig. S2. Only when the temperature was raised over 400 ℃ did the reaction products show good crystallinity, indicating that the TiO2 obtained at 200 ℃ on CuBi2O4 was amorphous.

The surface morphologies and elemental distributions of the CuBi2O4 and TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathodes were characterized by SEM, as shown in Fig. 2. From the images of the CuBi2O4 photocathodes shown in Fig. 2(a)(c), we can see that the CuBi2O4 film was composed of uniform nanoparticles with a diameter of 100–150 nm. Fig. 2(d)(f) show the SEM images of the TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathodes after modification with a TiO2 layer and annealing at 200 ℃. The boundary of the nanoparticles was blurred and the dispersibility deteriorated. The elemental distribution in the TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathodes is shown in Fig. 2(g)(i). The mapping results indicate that the TiO2 layer was uniformly deposited on the surface of the CuBi2O4 film. The morphologies of photocathodes treated at other temperatures are shown in Fig. S3, and no obvious difference was observed. The thickness of the TiO2/CuBi2O4-200 ℃ photocathode was determined as shown in Fig S4. From the results, we can see that the thickness of the TiO2/CuBi2O4 layer was approximately 350 nm.

Fig. 2. SEM images of the CuBi2O4 (a–c) and TiO2/CuBi2O4-200 ℃ (d–f) samples, and the mapping results of TiO2/CuBi2O4.

The optical properties of the prepared samples were characterized by UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy, as shown in Fig. 3. From their light absorption properties, it can be concluded that the CuBi2O4 samples showed excellent light response in the visible region. The light absorption of the CuBi2O4 photocathode was not influenced after modifying the TiO2 layer. The outstanding light response of CuBi2O4 highlights its potential as an outstanding photocathode material.

Fig. 3. UV-visible light absorption spectra of the CuBi2O4 and TiO2/CuBi2O4-200 ℃ photocathodes.

Herein, the coating of the TiO2 layer was used to promote the transmission of electrons generated from CuBi2O4. The effect of TiO2 layer thickness is a key factor for photocathode activity. The TiO2/CuBi2O4 samples with different thicknesses were fabricated using different spin-coating times, as shown in Fig. 4(a). From the current-potential curves, it is clear that the photoelectric activity initially increases and then decreases with increasing spin-coating times. The Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathodes showed the best performance at four cycles of spin-coating. Fig. 4(b) shows the photocurrent-time curves of the Pt/CuBi2O4 and Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathodes prepared with four cycles of spin-coating. Fig. 4(a) shows that the photocurrent onset potentials of the Pt/CuBi2O4 and Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 photoelectrodes are approximately 1.15 and 1.20 V, respectively, and that the TiO2 layer did not significantly affect the onset potential. The photocurrent densities of the Pt/CuBi2O4 and Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 electrodes at 0.60 V vs RHE were 0.22 and 0.35 mA/cm2, respectively. The comparison of the Photocurrent-time curves of Pt/CuBi2O4 and Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 at 0.60 V vs RHE showed a more significant effect of the TiO2 layer (Fig. 4(b)). For the Cu-based photocathodes, photoinduced corrosion is commonly encountered and difficult to solve. In these experiments, the pristine Pt/CuBi2O4 photocathode showed an initial photocurrent density of 0.22 mA/cm2, which decreased to 0.20 mA/cm2 over 100 s of reaction, corresponding to a 9% decrease. In contrast, Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 exhibited a pristine photocurrent density of 0.39 mA/cm2, which is 1.77 times that of the Pt/CuBi2O4 photocathode. In addition, the crystallinity of TiO2 was examined, and the results are shown in Fig. 4(c). The activity of the Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathodes decreased with increasing annealing temperature, and the amorphous TiO2 modified photocathodes prepared at 200 ℃ showed the best activity. Compared to that of the crystalline TiO2, amorphous TiO2 has a disordered structure resulting in a larger surface and more active sites [30, 31]. This leads to better contacting both for the CuBi2O4 and Pt and more efficient carrier separation. The Faradic efficiency and stability of the photocathode in photoelectrochemical H2 generation was also measured, as shown in Fig S5. The total Faradic efficiency over 60 min was approximately 96%, and the normalized current indicated the high stability of the photocathode.

Fig. 4. (a) Current-potential curves with different TiO2 layer thicknesses (annealed at 200 ℃, scanning rate of 10 mV/s). (b) Photocurrent-time curves of the Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 and Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathodes at 0.60 V vs. RHE in 0.1 mol/L NaOH. (c) Current-potential curves of the Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathodes annealed at different temperatures. (d) IPCE curves of the Pt/CuBi2O4 and Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4-200 ℃ photocathodes measured at 0.60 V vs. RHE in 0.1 mol/L NaOH.

The incident photon to current efficiency (IPCE) of the photoelectrodes was characterized at 0.60 V vs. RHE in 0.1 mol/L NaOH electrolyte (Fig. 4(d)). The IPCE of the CuBi2O4 photocathode at different wavelengths shows similar tendencies and increased significant after decorating TiO2 on the photocathode. The prepared Pt/CuBi2O4 and Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4-200 ℃ photocathodes showed their highest IPCE values of 1.4% and 2.9%, respectively, at 400 nm. These photoelectrochemical tests indicated that modifying amorphous TiO2 improved the activity of the CuBi2O4 photocathode.

To further understand the role of TiO2 in the improved PEC performance, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analysis and Mott-Schottky experiments were used to investigate the interfacial properties of the Pt/CuBi2O4 and Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathodes. The diameter of the semicircle in the EIS measurements reflects the resistance of electron transfer, which can directly indicate the photogenerated electron transfer efficiency at the interface between the electrodes and electrolyte solution [24, 25]. Fig. 5(a) shows the EIS curves of the Pt/CuBi2O4 and Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathodes measured in 0.1 mol/L NaOH under light illumination. The Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4-200 ℃ photocathode exhibited a smaller EIS curve diameter compared to that of the Pt/CuBi2O4 photocathode. This indicates that the resistance between the Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4-200 ℃ photocathode and electrolyte interface is smaller than that of the Pt/CuBi2O4 photocathode and electrolyte interface, allowing photogenerated electrons to transfer more efficiently upon modification with TiO2. Mott-Schottky analysis was used to confirm the flat band potential (Efb) and understand the changing interface, using a 1 kHz frequency and 10 mV amplitude. For p-CuBi2O4, a negative slope was obtained, as shown in Fig. 5(b), and the intersection point with the x-axis represents the Efb which was approximately 1.47 V. A negative shift of 0.11 V was observed after deposition of amorphous TiO2. From previous reports regarding the band gap structure of CuBi2O4 [20-23], we can conclude that n-TiO2 and p-CuBi2O4 construct a single kind of p-n heterojunction at the interface, which promotes carrier separation.

Fig. 5. (a) Nyquist plots of the Pt/CuBi2O4 and Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4-200 ℃ photocathodes. The EIS was measured at 0.60 V vs. RHE in 0.1 mol/L NaOH under light irradiation. (b) Mott-Schottky plots of the Pt/CuBi2O4 and Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4-200 ℃ photocathodes.

The internal elemental composition and the chemical state of the Pt/CuBi2O4 and Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathodes were further analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Fig. 6(a)(d) show the XPS spectra of Cu 2p, Bi 4f, O 1s, and Ti 2p, respectively. In the XPS spectra of the CuBi2O4 photocathode shown in Fig. 6(a), the peaks at 934.3 and 954.1 eV correspond to the binding energies of Cu 2p3/2 and Cu 2p1/2, respectively, and the peaks at 942.3 and 962.4 eV correspond to satellite peaks of Cu 2p. The Cu 2p peak positions and the presence of satellite peaks confirm that the copper in CuBi2O4 exists as Cu2+. The Bi 4f peaks located at 158.8 and 164.1 eV were assigned to the Bi 4f7/2 and Bi 4f5/2, respectively, of Bi3+. The peak at 529.8 eV originates from the oxygen in the crystal lattice and the higher binding energy of 531.6 eV indicates the presence of oxygen defects or absorbed chemical oxygen. Two weak peaks were observed at approximately 458.0 and 464.9 eV, originating from Ti 2p in TiO2 [26-28]. The Cu 2p, Bi 4f, and O 2p peaks showed negligible changes after TiO2 layer decorating, which indicates that the TiO2 deposition did not destroy the CuBi2O4 layer and increased the activity of the photocathode. In addition, FTIR spectra were used to investigate the surface of the TiO2/CuBi2O4 electrode, as shown in Fig. S6. The peak at approximately 1070 cm–1 was attributed to oxygen deficiency, and with increasing annealing temperature, the peak became weaker, indicating the loss of oxygen deficiency at higher temperatures [29].

Fig. 6. XPS spectra of the CuBi2O4 and TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathodes. (a) Cu 2p; (b) Bi 4f; (c) O 1s; (d) Ti 2p.

Based on the above experimental results, we proposed a possible mechanism to explain the higher efficiency of the Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathodes for PEC hydrogen production, as shown in Fig. 7. After modifying with the n-type semiconductor TiO2, a kind of type Ⅱ p-n CuBi2O4/TiO2 heterojunction formed. The heterojunction aided in the separation of electrons and holes generated by the CuBi2O4 film. As a result, the Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathode showed much better performance than that of the Pt/CuBi2O4 photocathode.

Fig. 7. Photoelectrochemical hydrogen production mechanism of the Pt/TiO2/CuBi2O4 photocathode.
4 Conclusions

In summary, a simple electrodeposition method was used to prepare highly crystalline CuBi2O4 films on FTO glass for PEC hydrogen production. The CuBi2O4 photocathodes were modified with an amorphous n-TiO2 layer by spin-coating, and with Pt by PEC reduction. Characterization of the photoelectrodes indicated that the TiO2 layer played a key role in the separation of the photogenerated electrons and holes because of the p-n heterojunction formed. A suitable thickness of TiO2 greatly enhanced the activity of CuBi2O4 photocathodes. This study provides a reference for the preparation of high-performance CuBi2O4 photocathodes.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51602179, 21333006, 21573135, and 11374190), and the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, 2013CB632401). Peng Wang acknowledges support from the Recruitment Program of Global Experts, China, and Baibaio Huang acknowledges support from the Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province.

References
[1]
A. Fujishima, K. Honda, Nature, 1972, 238: 37-38. DOI:10.1038/238037a0
[2]
Z. Y. Huang, Z. G Gao, M. Gao, Q. Y. Wang, Z. Y. Wang, B. B. Huang, Y. Dai, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 821-830. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62825-0
[3]
X. T. Wang, Y. M. Li, X. Liu, S. M. Gao, B. B. Huang, Y. Dai, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36: 389-399. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60234-5
[4]
H. J. Han, M. Fu, Y. L. Li, W. Guan, P. Lu, X. L. Hu, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39: 831-840. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62997-8
[5]
P. Wang, B. B. Huang, X. Y. Zhang, X. Y. Qin, H. Jin, Y. Dai, Z. Y. Wang, J. Y. Wei, J. Zhan, S. Y. Wang, J. P. Wang, M. H. Whangbo, Chem. Eur. J., 2009, 15: 1821-1824.
[6]
X. L. Zhu, P. Wang, B. B. Huang, X. C. Ma, X. Y. Qin, X. Y. Zhang, Y. Dai, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 199: 315-322. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.06.048
[7]
Z. Z. Lou, B. B. Huang, Z. Y. Wang, X. C. Ma, R. Zhang, X. Y. Zhang, X. Y. Qin, Y. Dai, M. H. Whangbo, Chem. Mater., 2014, 26: 3873-3875. DOI:10.1021/cm500657n
[8]
W. J. Wang, B. B. Huang, X. C. Ma, Z. Y. Wang, X. Y. Qin, X. Y. Zhang, Y. Dai, M. H. Whangbo, Chem. Eur. J., 2013, 19: 14777-14780. DOI:10.1002/chem.201302884
[9]
L. L. Ling, L. F. Liu, Y. W. Feng, J. Zhu, Z. F. Bian, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39: 639-645. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62980-2
[10]
D. Guevarra, A. Shinde, S. K. Suram, I. D. Sharp, F. M. Toma, J. A. Haber, J. M. Gregoire, Energy Environ. Sci., 2016, 9: 565-580. DOI:10.1039/C5EE03488D
[11]
Z. Y. Zhao, Z. S. Li, Z. G. Zou, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13: 4746-4753. DOI:10.1039/c0cp01871f
[12]
A. Landman, H. Dotan, G. E. Shter, M. Wullenkord, A. Houaijia, A. Maljusch, G. S. Grader, A. Rothschild, Nat. Mater., 2017, 16: 646-651. DOI:10.1038/nmat4876
[13]
M. W. Kanan, D. G. Nocera, Science, 2008, 321: 1072-1075. DOI:10.1126/science.1162018
[14]
B. Zhang, Z. Y. Wang, B. B. Huang, X. Y. Zhang, X. Y. Qin, H. L. Li, Y. Dai, Y. J. Li, Chem. Mater., 2016, 28: 6613-6620. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02639
[15]
A. Verma, A. Srivastav, A. Banerjee, D. Sharma, S. Sharma, U. B. Singh, V. R. Satsangi, R. Shrivastav, S. Dass, J. Power Sources, 2016, 315: 152-160. DOI:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.004
[16]
C. Yang, P. D. Tran, P. P. Boix, P. S. Bassi, N. Yantara, L. H. Wong, J. Barber, Nanoscale, 2014, 6: 6506-6510. DOI:10.1039/C4NR00386A
[17]
S. P. Berglund, H. He, W. D. Chemelewski, H. Celio, A. Dolocan, C. B. Mullins, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136: 1535-1544. DOI:10.1021/ja411604k
[18]
H. Kumagai, T. Minegishi, N. Sato, T. Yamada, J. Kubota, K. J. Domen, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3: 8300-8307. DOI:10.1039/C5TA01058F
[19]
F. Jiang, Gunawan, T. Harada, Y. Kuang, T. Minegishi, K. Domen, S. Ikeda, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137: 13691-13697. DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b09015
[20]
D. W. Gao, N. Nasori, Z. J. Wang, Y. Mi, L. Y. Wen, Y. Yang, S. C. Qu, Z. G. Wang, Y. Lei, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4: 8995-9001. DOI:10.1039/C6TA01234E
[21]
G. Sharma, Z. Q. Zhao, P. Sarker, B. A. Nail, J. R. Wang, M. N. Huda, F. E. Osterloh, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4: 2936-2942. DOI:10.1039/C5TA07040F
[22]
D. Kang, J. C. Hill, Y. Park, K. S. Choi, Chem. Mater., 2016, 28: 4331-4340. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01294
[23]
S. P. Berglund, F. F Abdi, P. Bogdanoff, A. Chemseddine, D. Friedrich, R. Krol, Chem. Mater., 2016, 28: 4231-4242. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00830
[24]
A. P. Wu, C. G. Tian, Y. Q. Jiao, Q. Yan, G. Y. Yang, H. G. Fu, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 203: 955-963. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.11.009
[25]
G. Q. Tan, L. N. She, T. Liu, C. Xu, H. J. Ren, A. Xia, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 207: 120-133. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.025
[26]
L. Yang, Y. N. Gao, F. Z. Wang, P. Liu, S. G. Hu, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38: 357-364. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62590-1
[27]
L. Kong, Z. Jiang, C Wang, F. Wan, Y. Li, L. Wu, J. F. Zhi, X. Zhang, S. Chen, Y. Liu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7: 7752-7758. DOI:10.1021/acsami.5b00888
[28]
F. Wang, H. Yang, Y. C. Zhang, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process., 2018, 73: 58-66. DOI:10.1016/j.mssp.2017.09.029
[29]
X. D. Wang, G. M. Wu, B. Zhou, J. Shen, Materials, 2013, 6: 76-84.
[30]
T. Grewe, H. Tüysüz, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7: 23153-23162. DOI:10.1021/acsami.5b06965
[31]
D. Zywitzki, H. Jing, H. Tüysüz, C. K. Chan, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5: 10957-10967. DOI:10.1039/C7TA01614J