催化学报  2019, Vol. 40 Issue (2): 214-222   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Pei Jing
Tao Gan
Hui Qi
Bin Zheng
Xuefeng Chu
Guiyang Yu
Wenfu Yan
Yongcun Zou
Wenxiang Zhang
Gang Liu
Synergism of Pt nanoparticles and iron oxide support for chemoselective hydrogenation of nitroarenes under mild conditions
Pei Jinga, Tao Gana, Hui Qib, Bin Zhenga, Xuefeng Chuc, Guiyang Yua, Wenfu Yana, Yongcun Zoua, Wenxiang Zhanga, Gang Liua     
a. State Key Laboratory of Inorganic Synthesis and Preparative Chemistry, College of Chemistry, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, Jilin, China;
b. The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130041, Jilin, China;
c. Provincial Key Laboratory of Architectural Electricity & Comprehensive Energy Saving, School of Electrical and Electronic Information Engineering, Jilin Jianzhu University, Changchun 130118, Jilin, China
* Corresponding author. Wenxiang Zhang, Tel: +86-431-85155390; Fax: +86-431-88499140; E-mail: zhwenx@jlu.edu.cn;
Gang Liu, Tel: +86-431-85155390; Fax: +86-431-88499140; E-mail: lgang@jlu.edu.cn
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21473073, 21473074), "13th Five-Year" Science and Technology Research of the Education Department of Jilin Province (2016403), the Development Project of Science and Technology of Jilin Province (20170101171JC, 20180201068SF), and the Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Inorganic Synthesis and Preparative Chemistry (201703)
Abstract: An efficient and low-cost supported Pt catalyst for hydrogenation of niroarenes was prepared with colloid Pt precursors and α-Fe2O3 as a support. The catalyst with Pt content as low as 0.2 wt% exhibits high activities, chemoselectivities and stability in the hydrogenation of nitrobenzene and a variety of niroarenes. The conversion of nitrobenzene can reach 3170 molconv h-1 molPt-1 under mild conditions (30℃, 5 bar), which is much higher than that of commercial Pt/C catalyst and many reported catalysts under similar reaction conditions. The spatial separation of the active sites for H2 dissociation and hydrogenation should be responsible for the high chemoselectivity, which decreases the contact possibility between the reducible groups of nitroarenes and Pt nanoparticles. The unique surface properties of α-Fe2O3 play an important role in the reaction process. It provides active sites for hydrogen spillover and reactant adsorption, and ultimately completes the hydrogenation of the nitro group on the catalyst surface.
© 2019, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Supported Pt catalyst    Iron oxide    Nitroarene hydrogenation    Chemoselectivity    Noble metal catalysis    
铂纳米粒子与氧化铁载体协同作用促进芳香硝基化合物温和条件下选择加氢
景培a, 甘涛a, 戚卉b, 郑彬a, 初学峰c, 于贵阳a, 闫文付a, 邹永存a, 张文祥a, 刘钢a     
a. 吉林大学化学学院, 无机合成与制备化学国家重点实验室, 吉林长春 130012;
b. 吉林大学第二医院, 吉林长春 130041;
c. 吉林建筑大学电气与电子信息工程学院, 吉林省建筑电气综合节能重点实验室, 吉林长春 130041
摘要:负载型Pt基催化剂是一类重要的工业催化剂,在很多还原和氧化反应中都表现出很高的催化活性,但高昂的价格一直制约着Pt基催化剂的大规模应用.另外,Pt活性位点对有机化合物不同基团的区分性差,通常造成目的产物的选择性较低.以人们熟知的芳香硝基化合物加氢为例,当有其它易还原基团如C=C、C=O、-X等存在时,在硝基加氢的同时,这些基团也不同程度地被还原.在已报道的工作中,通过合理设计Pt活性中心结构、改善Pt周围环境以及在反应中添加无机盐或有机化合物等方法,芳香硝基化合物加氢的选择性获得大幅提升,但催化剂活性对Pt负载量的依赖性仍然很高,降低催化剂中的Pt活性位数量会显著降低催化剂活性.此外,Pt纳米粒子在反应过程中的聚集以及氧化物载体在强还原气氛下的性能变化等对催化剂的稳定性产生很大影响.本文工作中我们尝试发挥载体在反应中的作用,实现氢解离和反应物加氢活性中心在空间上分离,从而降低Pt的负载量.工作思路主要是基于氢溢流的基本原理,其难点在于高效氢解离活性中心的设计和载体的选择,后者需满足活泼氢物种的输运和硝基基团的有效吸附.为了实现上述目标,本文采用胶体法制备了3-4nm的Pt粒子,该方法可以有效地控制Pt纳米粒子的尺寸以及在载体上的分散状态,从而形成大量的Pt0活性位,实现高效氢解离.在充分考虑载体的氧化还原性和表面碱性质(给电子能力)的基础上,我们筛选了多种氧化物作为载体.反应结果显示,Pt/α-Fe2O3在Pt负载量仅为0.2wt%时即表现出很高的芳香硝基化合物加氢催化活性和选择性,并且该反应可在相当温和的条件(30℃,5bar H2)下进行.在经过多次循环反应后,Pt纳米粒子的尺寸、分散状态以及α-Fe2O3载体的物相等均未发生变化,催化剂表现出很高的稳定性.Pt纳米粒子的高效氢解离能力是催化剂实现高活性的重要因素之一,而α-Fe2O3的表面性质也同样发挥了重要作用,其表面一定数量的氧空位具有较强的给电子能力,可以与具有较强吸电子能力的硝基基团作用,实现反应物的高效吸附;载体表面适当的氧化还原性有利于活泼氢的输运,在与Pt纳米粒子的协同作用下实现了温和条件下芳香硝基化合物的选择性加氢.本工作显著降低了Pt的使用量,实现了非常温和条件下的稳定、高效加氢,可为低成本Pt基催化剂的设计提供借鉴.
关键词负载型铂基催化剂    氧化铁    芳香硝基化合物加氢    选择性    贵金属催化    

1 Introduction

Pt-group metals supported on oxides or carbon are of great importance in many industrial chemical processes as heterogeneous catalysts [1-3]. They usually exhibit high efficiency in both oxidation and reduction reactions [4-7]. However, large scale application of Pt-based catalysts is still limited by their high cost [8-11]. Moreover, active Pt sites cannot discriminate the differences of functional groups, causing a low catalytic selectivity [12-14]. Take the hydrogenation of nitroarenes as an example, nitro groups and other reducible groups (e.g., C=C, C=O, –X, etc.) can be simultaneously hydrogenated over Pt metal active sites [15-18]. Some solutions for improving the selectivity include adding metal salts or organic compounds as additives, or loading a less active component (e.g., Au, Ag, etc.) [19-23]. The role of additives is to avoid the accumulation of hazardous aromatic hydroxylamines or lower the flat adsorption of nitroarenes with the benzene ring to decrease a simultaneous exposure of the reducible groups toward the active sites. However, most of them are at the cost of catalytic activity, and additional metal salts also face with the post-processing and new environmental problems.

Recent research shows that rational design of Pt-group centers and/or proper regulating the environment around Pt sites could obtain highly chemoselective catalysts for hydrogenation of nitroarenes [24-29]. For example, Zhang's group [24] reported that the catalyst with single-atom and pseudo-single-atom Pt supported on FeOx exhibits high activity and chemoselectivity for hydrogenation of functional nitroarenes. Corma et al. [25] showed that the chemoselectivity can be significantly improved by generating nanosized Pt with special exposed crystal faces on the surface of a TiO2 support. Qu and his coworkers [26] used porous CeO2 nanorods supported sub-nanometric Pd clusters as catalysts to improve chemoselectivity. However, practical applications of these catalysts still face great challenges due to the dependence of activity on the amount of Pt loading [28]. Reducing the Pt sites within the catalysts has a significantly negative effect on the catalytic activity. Moreover, the aggregation of Pt nanoparticles and stability of the oxide supports under strong reduction atmosphere also deserve concern.

In this work, we attempt to carry out the strategy of spatial separating the active sites to develop low cost and highly efficient catalysts for chemoselective hydrogenation of nitroarenes. It is expected to introduce the participation of oxide supports to enhance the utilization efficiency of Pt sites. This strategy is mainly based on the H2-spillover mechanism. The challenges for realizing this strategy include the efficiency of H2 dissociation over Pt centers, and the capacity of H diffusion and reactants adsorption over oxide supports [30-32]. More important is the synergism of these performances over Pt and oxide supports. Therefore, the fabrication of Pt sites and choosing well-matched oxides supports are the key factors for this strategy.

For achieving above goals, a colloid method is adopted to prepare Pt active centers, which has been proved in our previous work that this method could effectively control the sizes and the dispersion states of Pt particles [4, 33]. Considering the strong electron-withdrawing properties of nitro groups, several metal oxides with Lewis-basic sites are screened as catalyst supports, including Fe2O3, CeO2, Al2O3 MgO and TiO2. They could generally provide large number of electron-rich sites to interact with nitro groups [34, 35]. Interestingly, Pt/Fe2O3 with Pt-loading amount as low as 0.2 wt% exhibits high catalytic activities and chemoselectivities in the hydrogenation of a variety of nitroarenes. It should be noted that the catalytic tests are carried out under quite mild reaction conditions (30 ℃, 5 bar H2). Besides, both the Pt nanoparticles and Fe2O3 support exhibit a high stability under the strong reduction atmosphere. The highly efficient H2 dissociation over Pt nanoparticles (Pt0), and the capacity of H diffusion and reactant adsorption over α-phase Fe2O3 should be co-responsible for the excellent performance of Pt/Fe2O3 catalysts.

2 Experimental
2.1 Materials

Hexachloroplatinic(Ⅳ) acid hexahydrate, Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, Ce(NO3)3·6H2O and sodium carbonate were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Sodium hydroxide was obtained from Beijing Chemical Work. Titania P25 (TiO2) was purchased from Evonik Degussa (ca. 50 m2/g, anatase ca. 80% and rutile ca. 20%). Magnesium oxide (MgO) was obtained from Tianjin Fuchen Chemical Reagents Factory. Alumina oxides (γ-Al2O3) were purchased from Longkou Chemical Paking Co., Ltd. All chemical reagents used in the experiment were of commercially available analytical grade, which were used without further purification.

2.2 Preparation of oxide supports and Pt colloids

The precursor of the Fe2O3 support was prepared via a precipitation reaction of an aqueous solution of Fe(NO3)3·9H2O with sodium carbonate. In a typical preparation, a Na2CO3 aqueous solution was obtained by dissolving 23 g of Na2CO3 in 100 mL of water. 100 mL of an aqueous solution containing 56 g of Fe(NO3)3·9H2O was added dropwise into above solution. Then, additional aqueous solution of Na2CO3 (0.1 mol/L) was added into the mixture until the pH value reached 9.0. After aging for 2 h, the precursor was collected by filtration and washing with distilled water. Finally, the Fe2O3 support was obtained by calcining the precursor at 500 ℃ for 3 h. CeO2 was prepared by thermal treating Ce(NO3)3·6H2O at 350 ℃ for 4 h.

Platinum colloids were prepared by a polyol reduction method which was reported in our previous work [4, 33]. Typically, 13.5 mL glycol solution of sodium hydroxide (0.34 mol/L) and 30 mL glycol solution of H2PtCl6·6H2O (8.5 × 10-4 mol/L) were mixed under vigorous stirring for 20 min, and then heated at 140 ℃ for 30 min under N2 flow.

2.3 Preparation of supported Pt catalysts

All the oxides-supported Pt catalysts were prepared using a colloidal deposition method. Taking Pt/Fe2O3 catalyst as an example, a certain amount of Fe2O3 was added to the Pt colloids. After stirring for about 2 h at room temperature, the mixture was heated at 80 ℃ for 12 h. Then, the resulting mixture was filtered and washed several times with distilled water and dried at 100 ℃ overnight. Before characterizations and activity tests, the obtained solid was calcined in 20% O2/Ar at 200 ℃ for 2 h. The loading amount of Pt in Pt/Fe2O3 was tuned by the content of Pt colloids in the mixture, and finally identified with an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP). According to the ICP results, the samples were denoted as 0.1 wt% Pt/Fe2O3, 0.2 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 and 0.5 wt% Pt/Fe2O3. The preparation of other oxides-supported Pt catalysts also used the above colloidal deposition method. The loading amount of Pt was identified by ICP and shown in Table 1.

Table 1
Hydrogenation of nitrobenzene over different supported Pt catalysts a.
2.4 Characterizations

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded with a Rigaku X-ray diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm) at 40 kV and 40 mA. Elemental analysis for Pt was obtained using a PLASMA-SPEC(Ⅰ) inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained on a JEOL JEM-2010 electron microscope with an operating voltage of 200 kV. Temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) was performed using a Tianjin Xianquan TP-5079 adsorption analyzer. Before detection, the catalysts were treated in an Ar (99.99%) flow at 120 ℃ for 30 min. After the sample was cooled down to 30 ℃, the flowing gas was switched to 5 vol% H2/Ar and the sample was heated to 800 ℃ with a temperature ramp rate of 10 ℃/min. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were measured at –196 ℃, using a Micromeritics ASAP 2010N analyzer. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed on a Thermo ESCA LAB 250 system with Mg Kα source (1254.6 eV). Binding energies were obtained by referencing to the C 1s binding energy of carbon (peak at 284.6 eV). In-situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFT) spectra were recorded on a Nicolet 6700 spectrometer. Among them, in-situ CO adsorption DRIFT measurement was carried out to investigate the state of Pt. The samples were pretreated in N2 flow at 100 ℃ for 10 min. After the system was cooled to room temperature, a background spectrum was collected. Then the sample was exposed to 1 vol% CO/Ar flow before recording the spectra. In-situ DRIFT spectra of nitrobenzene adsorption and hydrogenation were obtained as following. Firstly, the samples were treated in 30 mL/min N2 flow at 100 ℃ for 10 min. Then, the nitrobenzene gas was carried by N2 flow and introduced into the sample cell for adsorption. In the hydrogenation measurement, the mixture of hydrogen and the nitrobenzene gases was simultaneously introduced into the sample cell, and the spectra were in-situ recorded.

2.5 Catalytic hydrogenation of nitroarenes

The liquid-phase hydrogenation reaction of nitroarenes was performed in a magnetically stirred 50 mL stainless steel autoclave. A quantity of catalyst (50 mg) was added to the autoclave containing nitroarene (1 mmol) and toluene (15 mL). Then, the autoclave was flushed with 10 bar hydrogen five times. After being sealed, the autoclave was charged with H2 until 5 bar and then it was kept at 30 ℃. A rotation rate of 1000 r/min was used in this work, which can effectively exclude the influence of mass transfer on the reactions. The reactants and products were analyzed with a gas chromatograph (GC-112A, FID detector) equipped with an HP-5 column (30 m). In the recycling experiments, the solid catalyst was separated by simple decantation and directly used for the next cycle without any further treatment.

3 Results and discussion

The hydrogenation of nitrobenzene was carried out to screen suitable oxide supports for supported Pt catalysts. Five oxides, Fe2O3, CeO2, Al2O3, MgO and TiO2, were chosen based on their the surface acid-base properties and reducibility [36]. All the supported Pt catalysts were prepared by a colloid deposition method. For achieving the aim of low cost, the Pt contents in these catalysts were controlled at 0.1 wt%-0.5 wt%. No Pt diffraction peaks can be observed in the XRD patterns of these supported Pt catalysts (Fig. 1 and Fig. S1). Table 1 shows the catalytic performance of these catalysts in hydrogenation of nitrobenzene. Without a catalyst or in the presence of the Fe2O3 support only, nearly no products can be detected (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). Under the same reaction conditions, Pt/Fe2O3 and Pt/CeO2 exhibit obviously higher activities than Pt/MgO, Pt/Al2O3 and Pt/TiO2. Compared with Pt/CeO2, Pt/Fe2O3 possesses the advantage of high stability under the reaction conditions (Table 1, entries 3 and 4). It can be recovered from the reaction mixture through simple filtration, and there is no obvious change in conversion of nitrobenzene and selectivity to aniline after five successive runs (Fig. 2A). It should be noted that mass transfer can be excluded in the above tests. Because of the bulk nature of these oxides (Fig. S2), the active sites are nearly all located on the external surface of the supports. In addition, the influence of stirring rate on the catalytic performance was also investigated. The same reaction rates under 800 and 1000 r/min over the Pt/Fe2O3 catalyst further show that mass transfer has little influence on the reaction (Fig. S3). The different activities over these catalysts should be mainly due to the surface properties of the oxide supports, which will be discussed below.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of 0.1 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 (a), 0.2 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 (b), 0.5 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 (c) and used 0.2 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 after five cycles (d).
Fig. 2. (A) Recycling test over the 0.2 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 catalyst and (B) catalytic performance of Pt/Fe2O3 with different Pt contents and commercial Pt/C catalyst. Reaction conditions: T = 30 ℃, P = 5 bar, mcat = 50 mg, 1 mmol nitrobenzene, 15 mL of toluene as solvent.

Fig. 2B shows the catalytic activities of Pt/Fe2O3 with different Pt loadings. The conversion of nitrobenzene improves with the increase of Pt contents. According to the initial reaction rates of these catalysts, the activities are normalized by Pt loading, which is 2627, 3170 and 2063 molconv. h-1 molPt-1 for 0.1 wt% Pt/Fe2O3, 0.2 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 and 0.5 wt% Pt/Fe2O3, respectively. It should be noted that such high activities are obtained under quite mild reaction conditions (30 ℃, 5 bar). Compared with the literature results under the similar reaction conditions, Pt/Fe2O3 exhibits obvious advantage (Table S1). Compared with the commercial Pt/C catalyst, Pt/Fe2O3 also possesses advantage. The conversion rate of nitrobenzene over 0.5 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 and 0.2 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 is also obviously higher than Pt/C under the same reaction conditions (Fig. 2B). It is known that the loading amount of Pt in the commercial Pt/C catalyst is 5 wt%, much higher than that of Pt/Fe2O3.

In addition, it is found that Pt/Fe2O3 also displayed good performance when extended to substituted nitroarenes. We mainly focus on nitroarenes with reducible groups such as –C=O, O=C–O and –X because they are with grand challenge for the application of selective hydrogenation. Table 2 shows that Pt/Fe2O3 exhibits high selectivity to the corresponding anilines. Even for halonitrobenzene, Pt/Fe2O3 catalyst is also with relatively high chemoselectivity. Previously, it has been reported that most Pt-based catalysts suffer from the hydrogenolysis of weak carbon-halogen bond [24]. In our case, the high chemoselectivity should be mainly due to the spatial separation of H2 dissociation and hydrogenation active sites. As for commercial Pt/C catalyst, a relatively low chemoselectivity is detected in the hydrogenation of substituted nitroarenes under the same reaction conditions (Table 2). Moreover, a decrease of chemoselectivity can also be observed over Pt/Fe2O3 when Pt loading is larger than 1 wt%, which should be due to the increase of contact possibility between Pt sites and reducible functional group.

Table 2
Hydrogenation of different substituted nitroarenes over the 0.2 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 and commercial Pt/C catalysts a.

Comparing the nitrobenzene conversion rates normalized by the Pt loading amount, it can be seen that these values are at the same order of magnitude, which should mainly ascribe to the uniform Pt nanoparticles highly dispersed on the surface of Fe2O3 and playing the similar role in the reaction process. It can be observed that the value over 0.5 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 is relatively low (2063 molconv. h-1 molPt-1), showing that there is no linear relationship between activity and the Pt loading. This result could give strong support to our strategy that separating the hydrogenation active sites from Pt to the supports. It is known that the Pt loading of 0.5 wt% is also a low content value compared with many literature and the contrast sample in this case. Given that the Pt particles are the hydrogenation active sites, the average contribution of Pt would not decrease from 3170 molconv. h-1 molPt-1 (0.2 wt% Pt) to 2063 molconv. h-1 molPt-1 (0.5 wt% Pt). It would maintain such high conversion efficiency at least in this loading range. The results in our case show that Pt sites only serve as hydrogen dissociation centers. The hydrogenation process should occur on the surface of Fe2O3 supports. According to above results, a reaction mechanism concerning H2 dissociation, nitroarene adsorption and hydrogenation is proposed (Scheme 1). The Fe2O3 support provides adsorption sites for the nitroarenes and should also function as the reaction area for the hydrogenation.

Scheme 1. Proposed reaction mechanism of H2 dissociation, adsorption and hydrogenation of nitroarenes on the Pt/Fe2O3 catalyst.

To verify this hypothesis, a series of characterizations were carried out to detect the physicochemical properties of Pt/Fe2O3 and in-situ reaction process of nitroarene hydrogenation over this catalyst. XRD patterns (Fig. 1) show that only diffraction peaks assigned to α-Fe2O3 phase could be observed on the patterns of both samples with different Pt contents and the one after five cycles. It shows that α-Fe2O3 possesses a relatively high stability. Both the reducibility of Pt colloids in the preparation process and the strong reduction atmosphere in the reaction process have little influence on the phase structure of α-Fe2O3. No diffraction peaks assigned to Pt can be observed, suggesting that Pt nanoparticles are highly dispersed on the surface of α-Fe2O3.

TEM images further confirm the above results. Fig. 3b and 3c shows that almost all Pt particles in the Pt/Fe2O3 catalyst are consistent with the size of Pt particles in the colloids (Fig. 3a). The size of 3–4 nm is the most probable distribution of these particles. It should be noted that Pt nanoparticles are highly dispersed on the surface of the Fe2O3 support, which might be correlated with the low loading amount. The shortest distance between two Pt nanoparticles is about 12 nm in the detected region. As for the spatial separation of the active sites, enough reaction area is needed, which could effectively reduce the contact possibility between the reducible groups of nitroarenes and Pt sites. Considering the largest molecule in the reactants is about 6 Å, it can be speculated that Pt/Fe2O3 provides enough spaces to achieve the spatial separation of H2 dissociation and hydrogenation active sites. Besides, the TEM images of the sample after five cycles are also shown in Fig. 3. Both the sizes and dispersion states of Pt are almost the same as that of the fresh one. No particle aggregation can be observed, suggesting that Pt nanoparticles possess a high stability during the reaction process.

Fig. 3. TEM images of Pt colloids (a), 0.2 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 (b and c) and used 0.2 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 after five cycles (d, e and f).

Pt 4f XPS was measured to analyze the surface chemical state of Pt nanoparticles (Fig. 4). Because of the detection limit, Pt signals in low Pt-content samples are hard to detect, so 0.5 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 was used as the representative sample for testing. Two main peaks centered at about 71.5 and 74.6 eV can be observed, which are corresponding to the spin-orbit split doublet of Pt 4f7/2 and Pt 4f5/2, respectively [33, 37-39]. The binding energy of this original peak center is consistent with the Pt0 electron binding energy. Although the spectra still could be deconvoluted into the components of metal Pt (Pt0) and oxide states Pt (Pt2+), the amount of oxide states Pt (Pt2+) is quite limited. Metallic Pt should be the absolutely predominant one in the sample.

Fig. 4. Pt 4f and O 1s XPS spectra of 0.5 wt% Pt/Fe2O3.

Furthermore, in-situ DRIFT spectra of adsorbed CO at room temperature were also recorded over the samples of 0.1 wt% Pt/Fe2O3, 0.2 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 and 0.5 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 to confirm the chemical state of Pt. It is known that vco > 2100 cm-1 is assigned to the linear adsorption of CO on oxide states Pt, while vco < 2100 cm-1 is ascribed to CO adsorbed on metallic Pt [40, 41]. Fig. 5 shows that a relatively strong band at 2085 cm-1 appears in all three samples, which can be ascribed to CO adsorbed on metallic Pt. This result confirms that Pt mainly presents as metallic state in Pt/Fe2O3, and a small amount of Pt2+ detected by Pt 4f XPS should be located at the interface between Pt nanoparticles and supports, which can be reflected from the shoulder peak of CO adsorption. This metallic Pt possesses strong H2 dissociation ability. H2-TPR profiles show that the reduction peaks corresponding to Fe3+ to Fe2+ shift significantly to the relatively low temperature in the presence of Pt nanoparticles (Fig. 6). It decreases at least 120 ℃ compared with that of pure Fe2O3 support. Increasing the Pt contents could further decrease the reduction temperature. In addition, the low reduction temperature and narrow reduction peak could also show that Fe2O3 support possesses excellent hydrogen spillover capability. It could facilitate the diffusion of hydrogen on the surface of Fe2O3. In our case, the strong H2 dissociation ability of Pt nanoparticles and hydrogen spillover capability of Fe2O3 support should be two important factors that catalyze the hydrogenation reaction under mild conditions (30 ℃, 5 bar).

Fig. 5. In-situ DRIFT spectra of CO adsorbed on 0.1 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 (a), 0.2 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 (b) and 0.5 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 (c).
Fig. 6. H2-TPR profiles of Fe2O3 (a), 0.1 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 (b), 0.2 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 (c) and 0.5 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 (d).

For understanding the adsorption behavior and hydrogenation of nitroarenes over the Pt/Fe2O3 catalyst, in-situ DRIFT measurements were carried out. Nitrobenzene is introduced by a N2 flow to the Fe2O3 support and 0.2 wt% Pt/Fe2O3. Two bands appeared at 1531 and 1350 cm-1 could be attributed to asymmetric stretching and symmetric stretching vibrations of the nitro group, respectively [28]. There is no difference between Fe2O3 support and Pt/Fe2O3 (Fig. 7a and 7c), suggesting that the nitro group mainly adsorbed on the surface of Fe2O3 support. Upon introducing H2 to 0.2wt% Pt/Fe2O3, a new broad band can be observed at 1589–1620 cm-1 (Fig. 7d), which is attributed to the vibrations of –NO and –NH2 species [28, 42, 43]. This suggests that hydrogenation of nitrobenzene occurs over 0.2 wt% Pt/Fe2O3. In contrast, when H2 is introduced to the Fe2O3 support, no signal assigned to –NH2 species can be observed (Fig. 7b). This is mainly due to the lack of H2 dissociation sites on the Fe2O3 support.

Fig. 7. In-situ DRIFT spectra of nitrobenzene adsorption over Fe2O3 (a) and 0.2 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 (c); co-presence of nitrobenzene and H2: Fe2O3 (b) and 0.2 wt% Pt/Fe2O3 (d).

The strong nitrobenzene adsorption behavior for Fe2O3 should origin from the presence of oxygen vacancies. The O 1s XPS spectrum (Fig. 4) indicates that a large amount of oxygen vacancy (531 eV) is present on the surface of Pt/Fe2O3 [44, 45]. These oxygen vacancies are electron-rich sites, which could have a relatively strong interaction with nitro groups (strong electron-withdrawing group). Correspondingly, a relatively broad Fe 2p XPS peak (711 and 724.3 eV) can be observed (Fig. S4). It shows that most of iron species on the surface of the samples are present as a valence of +3, combining with a small amount of iron species with a valence of +2 [10, 46]. This property should facilitate both the reactant adsorption and the hydrogen spillover.

It should be noted that the high stability of α-Fe2O3 under the reduction condition is also a critical factor for Pt/Fe2O3 to become an excellent catalyst. We had ever detected the performance of ferrihydrite (Fe(OH, H2O) and composite iron oxides co-presence of (Fe(OH, H2O) and α-Fe2O3 (Fig. S5). It is well known that the presence of water could accelerate the diffusion of hydrogen atoms across solid oxide surfaces. Although the catalysts prepared with above two oxides exhibit a little higher initial activity than α-Fe2O3 (Fig. S6), their poor performance in the following reaction cycles shows that they cannot become efficient catalysts (Fig. S7). As for the support of α-Fe2O3, it exhibits not only relatively high activity but also high stability in the hydrogenation of nitroarenes.

Combined with the catalytic tests and characterization results, it can be confirmed that the supports play an important role in the reaction process. The catalyst performance directly correlates with their capability of reactant adsorption and hydrogen spillover. Reducible oxides have higher capability of hydrogen spillover than irreducible oxide supports, which reflects on not only the spillover speed but also the migrated distance [30]. It should be the main reason that Al2O3- and MgO-supported Pt catalysts exhibit low activities. The stability of the supports under the reduction condition should also be concerned. The poor recyclability of CeO2 and ferrihydrite supported samples should be mainly due to the stability of the oxide support in the presence of H2. Actually, both CeO2 and ferrihydrite have higher reducibility than α-Fe2O3 because of the high activity of surface oxygen species, but these active species are easily damaged in the strong reduction atmosphere of H2.

In addition, the adsorption behavior of the supports is another important factor that affects the catalytic performance of these catalysts. It is directly affected by the surface electronic properties of the supports. Some literature has reported that modifying the catalysts with vanadium salts or organic thiol compounds could effectively tune the adsorption and desorption behavior of the catalysts [19, 20]. The role of vanadium salts is to avoid accumulation of hazardous aromatic hydroxylamines, while organic thiol compounds could avoid the flat adsorption of nitroarenes via the benzene ring. Flat adsorption would cause a simultaneous exposure of the reducible groups toward the active sites. In our case, the suitable surface chemical state of α-Fe2O3 facilitates the adsorption of nitro group of nitroarenes. The unique properties of α-Fe2O3 realize its high performance cooperated with Pt nanoparticles for chemoselective hydrogenation of niroarenes.

References
[1]
E. Schmidt, A. Vargas, T. Mallat, A. Baiker, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 12358-12367. DOI:10.1021/ja9043328
[2]
W. Y. Cui, D. Xue, N. D. Tan, B. Zheng, M. J. Jia, W. X. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 1534-1542. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63082-7
[3]
J. J. Liu, S. H. Zou, J. C. Wu, H. Kobayashi, H. T. Zhao, J. Fan, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 1081-1089. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63022-0
[4]
B. Zheng, S. J. Wu, X. W. Yang, M. J. Jia, W. X. Zhang, G. Liu, ACS. Appl. Mater. Inter., 2016, 8, 26683-26689. DOI:10.1021/acsami.6b06501
[5]
P. P. Ye, A. J. Gellman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 8518-8526. DOI:10.1021/ja075292j
[6]
G. C. da Silva, M. R. Fernandes, E. A. Ticianelli, ACS. Catal., 2018, 8, 2081-2092. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.7b03429
[7]
Z. J. Chen, J. Y. Chen, Y. W. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 1108-1126. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62852-3
[8]
S. Anantharaj, P. E. Karthik, B. Subramanian, S. Kundu, ACS. Catal., 2016, 6, 4660-4672. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b00965
[9]
Y. L. Sui, S. B. Liu, T. F. Li, Q. X. Liu, T. Jiang, Y. F. Guo, J. L. Luo, J. Catal., 2017, 353, 250-255. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2017.07.024
[10]
L. L. Geng, M. Zhang, W. X. Zhang, M. J. Jia, W. F. Yan, G. Liu, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, 5, 3097-3102. DOI:10.1039/C5CY00022J
[11]
R. V. Jagadeesh, A. E. Surkus, H. Junge, M-M. Pohl, J. Radnik, J. Rabeah, H. Huan, V. Schünemann, A. Brückner, M. Beller, Science, 2013, 342, 1073-1076. DOI:10.1126/science.1242005
[12]
Y. J. Shu, T. Chen, H. C. Chan, L. F. Xie, Q. S. Gao, Chem-Asian. J., 2018, 13, 3737-3744. DOI:10.1002/asia.v13.23
[13]
Q. M. Hu, S. Wang, Z. Gao, Y. Q. Li, Q. Zhang, Q. Xiang, Y. Qin, Appl. Catal. B:Environ., 2017, 218, 591-599. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.087
[14]
M. W. Zhu, B. Huang, Q. Shao, Y. C. Pi, Y. Qian, X. Q. Huang, ChemCatChem., 2018, 10, 3214-3218. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201800238
[15]
W. Shi, B. S. Zhang, Y. M. Lin, Q. Wang, Q. Zhang, D. S. Su, ACS. Catal., 2016, 6, 7844-7854. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b02207
[16]
P. Lara, K. Philippot, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 2445-2465. DOI:10.1039/C4CY00111G
[17]
G. Vilé, D. Albani, N. Almora-Barrios, N. López, J. Pérez-Ramírez, ChemCatChem., 2016, 8, 21-33. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201501269
[18]
J. Wang, Y. J. Zhang, J. Y. Diao, J. Y. Zhang, H. Y. Liu, D. S. Su, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 79-87. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62925-5
[19]
K. Mö bus, D. Wolf, H. Benischke, U. Dittmeier, K. Simon, U. Packruhn, R. Jantke, S. Weidlich, C. Weber, B. S. Chen, Top. Catal., 2010, 53, 1126-1131. DOI:10.1007/s11244-010-9545-1
[20]
M. Makosch, W-I. Lin, V. Bumbálek, J. Sá, J. W. Medlin, K. Hungerbühler, J. A. van Bokhoven, ACS. Catal., 2012, 2, 2079-2081. DOI:10.1021/cs300378p
[21]
K-i. Shimizu, Y. Miyamoto, A. Satsuma, J. Catal., 2010, 270, 86-94. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2009.12.009
[22]
K-i. Shimizu, Y. Miyamoto, T. Kawasaki, T. Tanji, Y. Tai, A. Satsuma, J. Phys. Chem. C., 2009, 113, 17803-17810. DOI:10.1021/jp906044t
[23]
T. Mitsudome, Y. Mikami, M. Matoba, T. Mizugaki, K. Jitsukawa, K. Kaneda, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 136-139. DOI:10.1002/anie.201106244
[24]
H. S. Wei, X. Y. Liu, A. Q. Wang, L. L. Zhang, B. T. Qiao, X. F. Yang, Y. Q. Huang, S. Miao, J. Y. Liu, T. Zhang, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 5634-5641. DOI:10.1038/ncomms6634
[25]
A. Corma, P. Serna, P. Concepcion, J. J. Calvino, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 8748-8753. DOI:10.1021/ja800959g
[26]
S. Zhang, C. R. Chang, Z. Q. Huang, J. Li, Z. M. Wu, Y. Y. Ma, Z. Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Q. Qu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 2629-2637. DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b11413
[27]
L. Wang, E. J. Guan, J. Zhang, J. H. Yang, Y. H. Zhu, Y. Han, M. Yang, C. Cen, G. Fu, B. C. Gates, F. S. Xiao, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 1362-1369. DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-03810-y
[28]
H. S. Wei, Y. J. Ren, A. Q. Wang, X. Y. Liu, X. Liu, L. L. Zhang, S. Miao, L. Li, J. Y. Liu, J. H. Wang, G. F. Wang, D. S. Su, T. Zhang, Chem. Sci., 2017, 8, 5126-5131. DOI:10.1039/C7SC00568G
[29]
B. Zhang, H. Asakura, J. Zhang, J. G. Zhang, S. De, N. Yan, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 8319-8323. DOI:10.1002/anie.201602801
[30]
W. Karim, C. Spreafico, A. Kleibert, J. Gobrecht, J. VandeVondele, Y. Ekinci, J. A. van Bokhoven, Nature, 2017, 541, 68-71. DOI:10.1038/nature20782
[31]
L. R. Merte, G. Peng, R. Bechstein, F. Rieboldt, C. A. Farberow, L. C. Grabow, W. Kudernatsch, S. Wendt, E. Laegsgaard, M. Mavrikakis, F. Besenbacher, Science, 2012, 336, 889-893. DOI:10.1126/science.1219468
[32]
R. Prins, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 2714-2738. DOI:10.1021/cr200346z
[33]
B. Zheng, G. Liu, L. L. Geng, J. Y. Cui, S. J. Wu, P. Wu, M. J. Jia, W. F. Yan, W. X. Zhang, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6, 1546-1554. DOI:10.1039/C5CY00840A
[34]
A. Corma, P. Serna, H. Garcia, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 6358-6359. DOI:10.1021/ja0704131
[35]
M. Boronat, P. Concepcion, A. Corma, S. Gonzalez, F. Illas, P. Serna, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 16230-16237. DOI:10.1021/ja076721g
[36]
J. L. Song, G. Y. Yu, X. Li, X. W. Yang, W. X. Zhang, W. F. Yan, G. Liu, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 309-318. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)63006-7
[37]
L. Q. Liu, F. Zhou, L. G. Wang, X. J. Qi, F. Shi, Y. Q. Deng, J. Catal., 2010, 274, 1-10. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2010.05.022
[38]
Z. Z. Yang, N. Zhang, Y. Cao, M. C. Gong, M. Zhao, Y. Q. Chen, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 3032-3043. DOI:10.1039/C4CY00424H
[39]
R. Ahmadi, M. K. Amini, J. C. Bennett, J. Catal., 2012, 292, 81-89. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2012.05.001
[40]
E. Ivanova, M. Mihaylov, F. Thibault-Starzyk, M. Daturi, K. Hadjiivanov, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2007, 274, 179-184. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2007.05.006
[41]
S. Shen, X. L. Wang, Q. Ding, S. Q. Jin, Z. C. Feng, C. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2014, 35, 1900-1906. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60172-8
[42]
G. Richner, J. A. van Bokhoven, Y. M. Neuhold, M. Makosch, K. Hungerbuhler, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, 12463-12471. DOI:10.1039/c1cp20238c
[43]
S. Meijers, V. Ponec, J. Catal., 1996, 160, 1-9. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1996.0117
[44]
D. Flak, Q. Chen, B. S. Mun, Z. Liu, M. Rę kas, A. Braun, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 455, 1019-1028. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.002
[45]
S. Sultana, S. Mansingh, K. M. Parida, J. Mater. Chem. A., 2018, 6, 11377-11389. DOI:10.1039/C8TA02539H
[46]
L. L. Geng, J. L. Song, B. Zheng, S. J. Wu, W. X. Zhang, M. J. Jia, G. Liu, Chin. J. Catal., 2016, 37, 1451-1460. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62506-8