催化学报  2019, Vol. 40 Issue (3): 240-288   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Rongchen Shen
Jun Xie
Quanjun Xiang
Xiaobo Chen
Jizhou Jiang
Xin Li
Ni-based photocatalytic H2-production cocatalysts
Rongchen Shena, Jun Xiea, Quanjun Xiangb, Xiaobo Chenc, Jizhou Jiangd, Xin Lia     
a. College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Key Laboratory of Energy Plants Resource and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Biomass Energy of Guangdong Regular Higher Education Institutions, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China;
b. State Key Laboratory of Electronic Thin Film and Integrated Devices, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, Sichuan, China;
c. Department of Chemistry, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, 64110, USA;
d. School of Environmental Ecology and Biological Engineering, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, Hubei, China
* Corresponding author. Quanjun Xiang, E-mail: xiangqj@uestc.edu.cn;
Xiaobo Chen, E-mail: chenxiaobo@umkc.edu;
Xin Li, E-mail: Xinliscau@yahoo.com
This work was supprted by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51672089, 51672099), Specical Funding on Applied Science and Technology in Guangdong (2017B020238005), the State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Material Synthesis and Processing (Wuhan University of Technology) (2015-KF-7)
Abstract: Photocatalysis is believed to be one of the best methods to realize sustainable H2 production. However, achieving this through heterogeneous photocatalysis still remains a great challenge owing to the absence of active sites, sluggish surface reaction kinetics, insufficient charge separation, and a high thermodynamic barrier. Therefore, cocatalysts are necessary and of great significance in boosting photocatalytic H2 generation. This review will focus on the promising and appealing low-cost Ni-based H2-generation cocatalysts as the alternatives for the high-cost and low-abundance noble metal cocatalysts. Special emphasis has been placed on the design principle, modification strategies for further enhancing the activity and stability of Ni-based cocatalysts, and identification of the exact active sites and surface reaction mechanisms. Particularly, four types of modification strategies based on increased light harvesting, enhanced charge separation, strengthened interface interaction, and improved electrocatalytic activity have been thoroughly discussed and compared in detail. This review may open a new avenue for designing highly active and durable Ni-based cocatalysts for photocatalytic H2 generation.
© 2019, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Heterogeneous photocatalysts    Ni-based cocatalysts    Photocatalytic H2 generation    Solar fuel    Heterojunctions    
镍基光催化产氢助催化剂
沈荣晨a, 谢君a, 向全军b, 陈小波c, 江吉周d, 李鑫a     
a. 华南农业大学林学与风景园林学院, 农业部能源植物资源与利用重点实验室, 广东省高校生物质能源重点实验室, 广东广州 510642, 中国;
b. 电子科技大学电子薄膜与集成器件国家重点实验室, 四川成都 610054, 中国;
c. 密苏里大学堪萨斯分校化学系, 卡萨斯城 64110, 美国;
d. 武汉工程大学环境生态与生物工程学院, 湖北武汉 430205, 中国
摘要:近年来,化石能源的持续使用导致能源短缺和环境污染问题日益突出,因此,人们一直致力于开发新的清洁可再生替代能源.其中,氢气因其燃烧热值高、燃烧产物无污染等优点被认为是最具发展潜力的清洁能源之一.自从1972年日本东京大学Fujishima教授和Honda教授首次发现TiO2单晶电极光催化分解水可以产生氢气以来,非均相光催化制氢被认为是实现可持续制氢最有潜力的方法之一.然而,由于光催化剂普遍存在缺少活性中心、表面反应速率低、光生载流子快速复合、热力学势垒高等制约因素,因此如何在光催化产氢反应中提高催化剂的量子效率和稳定性仍是目前所面临的一项巨大挑战.将电催化剂(用作助催化剂)负载到不同的半导体表面后,其表现出较高的光催化分解水产氢活性和稳定性.一般来说,采用贵金属(如铂、金和银)作为助催化剂可有效地提高半导体的光催化产氢性能.然而,贵金属成本高、丰度低,大大限制了其广泛应用.在非贵金属中,镍基助催化剂因其成本低、活性高、稳定性好而表现出较好的应用前景.本文主要针对用于光催化制氢反应的镍基助催化剂进行综述.首先,对镍基助催化剂的光催化动力学研究进行了总结,从光捕获、光生载流子的分离、半导体的本体及界面电荷输运、助催化剂捕获载流子及其表面电催化反应等过程进行详细分析,发现协同考虑和优化上述过程是开发高效产氢光催化剂的关键.同时,通过不同方法对催化剂改性并担载合适的镍基助催化剂,从而集成设计光催化剂是一种具有较好应用前景的策略.然后,对镍基电催化剂在催化制氢反应中应用的基本原理进行分析,系统地从组成工程、纳米结构工程、界面工程、表面工程和杂化工程方面综述了电催化剂的设计策略;并对镍基助催化剂的作用进行分析,包括:增加析氢活性中心,降低活化能,提高光催化效率,促进电荷的分离和传输,降低电化学析氢过电位和增强催化析氢动力学等.同时,对镍基助催化剂活性位的原位表征及反应路径相关文献进行了简要总结.通过上述分析得出以下结论:为设计高效的光催化产氢催化剂体系,需要综合考虑并优化镍基助催化剂表面的电催化产氢性能、捕光半导体中的电荷分离/转移及它们之间的界面电荷分离性能.本文着重对基于提高光捕获率(包括设计分级光催化剂、利用表面敏化和开发宽光谱光催化剂)、增强电荷分离(包括设计纳米结构、构建肖特基结、构造Ⅱ/p-n型异质结和建立直接Z型异质结)、增强半导体/助催化剂的界面相互作用、提高助催化剂的电催化活性(包括增加活性位数量、加强单个活性位本征活性和实现高分散/限阈效应)四种改性策略进行了较详细的讨论和比较,为设计高活性和高稳定性的镍基产氢光催化剂提供了新的设计思路.最后,对镍基产氢助催化剂进行了展望.一方面,进一步开发新型镍基析氢助催化剂和半导体异质结,通过调节和优化助催化剂的半导体/助催化剂界面结构和电导率,从而达到最优光催化效率.同时,应尝试通过工艺简单、易规模化的方法制备更多金属、多功能、超薄二维镍基纳米片、核壳和限制性纳米结构及单原子等催化剂体系,并将其应用于开发高效的光催化制氢催化剂.另一方面,进一步采用多种原位表征技术,如XAS研究、EPR测试和拉曼光谱技术等,精准地分析镍基催化剂上的析氢活性中心,深入分析不同异质结和助催化剂中的电荷载流子转移/分离动力学.同时,通过DFT精确计算反应势垒、氢吸附能和水分子吸附/解离特性等相关信息,进而充分理解电荷载流子动力学和反应途径,明确镍基助催化剂活性中心表面电催化反应机理.希望在不远的将来,根据镍基析氢活性中心的详细结构与性能关系,可以精准地设计、构建高效的镍基析氢活性中心,为高效光催化产氢,并为最终开发新的清洁可再生替代能源提供效的催化技术.
关键词多相光催化剂    镍基助催化剂    光催化制氢    太阳燃料    异质结    

1 Introduction

Recently, the continued use of fossil sources of C has led to increased concerns about the depletion of fossil fuel reserves, the increase in greenhouse gas emissions, and other environmental problems. As a C-free and environmentally friendly energy carrier, sustainable H2 production by photocatalytic water splitting has been widely investigated since the pioneering work on photoelectrochemical water splitting by using TiO2 photoanode by Fujishima et al. in 1972 [1]. However, owing to the sluggish multielectron reduction kinetics and a large positive change in the thermodynamic Gibbs free energy (△G0 = +237.2 kJ mol-1) for the uphill water-splitting reaction [6], most of the photocatalysts for H2 evolution generally show low quantum efficiencies and stability [2-4]. Therefore, to significantly accelerate the reaction kinetics and decrease the thermodynamic barrier, electrocatalysts (used as cocatalysts) are usually loaded onto the surfaces of different semiconductors to achieve highly active and durable photocatalytic H2 generation by water splitting [5, 6]. In general, noble metal nanoparticles, such as those of Pt, Au, and Ag, could be used as effective cocatalysts to boost the photocatalytic H2 evolution over semiconductors. However, the high cost and low abundance of noble metals significantly limit their widespread applications. Among the noble-metal-free cocatalysts, Ni-based cocatalysts have attracted extensive attention owing to their low costs, high activity, and stability [7-11]. In 1980, Domen et al. [12] demonstrated for the first time that SrTiO3 modified with NiO cocatalyst could realize steady overall splitting of water vapor into H2 and O2. Subsequently, they also demonstrated that the existence of Ni metal at the interface of NiO and SrTiO3 played an important role in promoting electron transfer from SrTiO3 to NiO [13]. Since then, Ni-based H2-evolution electrocatalysts and cocatalysts have attracted increasing interest from different research communities [14-21]. As shown in Fig. 1, almost 50 and 120 papers on Ni-based H2-evolution electrocatalysts and cocatalysts, respectively, have been published since 2015. Indeed, a significantly increasing trend in the number of publications concerning Ni-based H2-evolution electrocatalysts and cocatalysts is expected over the next few years. Consequently, it is urgently required, though challenging, to develop more efficient and durable Ni-based cocatalysts for photocatalytic H2 generation, which will continuously inspire new ideas and discussions and stimulate new and exciting research advances in the field of photocatalytic H2 generation.

Fig. 1. (A) Number of publications since 1998 on Ni-based photocatalytic H2-production cocatalysts involving the use of "photo* or light*", "hydrogen* or H2 or H-2", and "Nickel* or Ni" as the three topical keywords. (B) Number of publications since 1998 on Ni-based H2-production electrocatalysts involving the use of "*electro*", "hydrogen* or H2 or H-2", and "Nickel* or Ni" as the three topical keywords. (Adapted from ISI Web of Science Core Collection, date of search: Dec. 23, 2018).

Significant progress has been made in photocatalytic or electrocatalytic H2 evolution by using Ni-based cocatalysts and electrocatalysts over the past decade [22, 23]. In 2011, Dubois and his coworkers first reported a synthetic Ni complex electrocatalyst, [Ni(P2PhNPh)2](BF4)2, (P2PhNPh = 1, 3, 6-triphenyl-1-aza-3, 6-diphosphacycloheptane), that exhibited superhigh H2-production activity in protonated dimethylformamide solution [24]. Surprisingly, the electrocatalyst could achieve turnover frequencies of 33, 000 and 106, 000 s-1 in dry acetonitrile and in the presence of 1.2 mol/L of water, respectively, at a potential of -1.13 V (Fig. 2(A)). Subsequently, in 2012, Krauss and his coworkers reported a robust and highly active solar H2-generation system with > 600, 000 turnovers at pH = 4.5 (Fig. 2(B)), in which CdSe nanocrystals capped with dihydrolipoic acid (DHLA), ascorbic acid, and soluble Ni2+-DHLA were employed as the light absorber, electron donor, and H2-evolution cocatalyst, respectively [25]. Since the publication of the two aforementioned famous reports, Ni-based H2-evolution cocatalysts and electrocatalysts have been extensively investigated by using different modification strategies [16, 17, 22, 23]. However, reviews on Ni-based H2-evolution cocatalysts for photocatalytic H2-evolution over different semiconductors are still limited [22, 23]. Most of the reviews published only summarized the progresses in the development of the various Ni-based cocatalysts used in semiconductor photocatalytic H2-generation systems. However, the modification strategies for further enhancing the activity and stability of Ni-based cocatalysts and the identification of the exact active sites and surface reaction mechanisms have been nearly completely neglected. Therefore, it is timely to summarize the past research efforts in order to promote further developments in this area. We believe that it is also of significant importance to exploit new Ni-based H2-evolution cocatalysts and develop new modification strategies, and deeply investigate the exact active sites and surface reaction mechanisms to boost the selectivity, stability, and activity towards photocatalytic H2 evolution. Hence, in this review, we will focus on the progress of different kinds of Ni-based H2-evolution cocatalysts. The design principle, modification strategies, and functional mechanisms of these Ni-based H2-evolution cocatalysts will be thoroughly discussed and summarized.

Fig. 2. (A) A synthetic Ni complex, [Ni(P2PhNPh)2](BF4)2, (P2PhNPh = 1, 3, 6-triphenyl-1-aza-3, 6-diphosphacycloheptane) for highly active electrocatalytic H2 production. (TOF > 106, 000 s-1 in a mixture of acetonitrile and 1.2 mol/L water, at a potential of 1.13 V vs the ferrocenium/ferrocene couple) [24] (B) Dihydrolipoic acid (DHLA)-capped CdSe nanocrystals with the soluble Ni2+-DHLA cocatalyst for highly active and durable photocatalytic H2 generation. (TON > 600, 000, QE (at 520 nm) = 36%, acid as an electron donor at pH = 4.5) [25].
2 Fundamentals of Ni-based H2-production cocatalysts
2.1 Semiconductor-based photocatalytic H2 evolution

In general, semiconductor-based photocatalytic reactions are strongly dependent on three reaction processes: light harvesting, charge transport and separation, and surface catalytic reaction processes [26-32]. For photocatalytic H2 evolution over powdered semiconductors with Ni-based cocatalysts, there are four processes during the photocatalysis (Fig. 3). They include (1) light harvesting; (2) separation of photogenerated charge carriers; (3) bulk and interface (between the semiconductor and cocatalysts) transport of charge carriers; and (4) the trapping of charge carriers by the cocatalysts and surface electrocatalytic reactions occurring on them. Clearly, the charge recombinations observed in the bulk, interface, and surface of semiconductors are unfavorable factors, which could significantly decrease the quantum yield of H2 evolved [33-35]. Thus, in comparison with increasing the light harvesting by narrowing the bandgap of the semiconductor, both improving the transfer/separation and accelerating the surface reaction kinetics of the photogenerated charge carriers seem to be much more crucial in enhancing the overall photocatalytic efficiency [36, 37]. Therefore, on one hand, research efforts are continuously taken to design various kinds of nanostructured heterojunction photocatalysts to enhance the photocatalytic activity for H2 evolution by promoting the bulk and interfacial separation of the photogenerated charge carriers [38-40]. Until now, a large number of semiconductor heterojunctions [37, 38, 41-43] such as type Ⅰ heterojunctions, type Ⅱ heterojunctions, p-n heterojunctions, Schottky-based junctions, surface heterojunctions [44], phase junctions [45-50], and direct Z-scheme [51-53] and S-scheme [54] heterojunctions have been widely designed to produce favorable built-in electrical fields for boosting the charge separation, thus achieving enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution. On the other hand, more attention has also been paid to accelerating the sluggish surface reaction kinetics by loading proper cocatalysts over semiconductors. Up to now, noble-metal-based [55-57] (i.e., Pt, Pd, Au, and Ag), earth-abundant-metal-based [6, 58-61] (i.e., Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Mo, and W), metal-free C-based [26, 62-67], and their hybrid cocatalysts have been widely exploited and applied in photocatalytic H2 evolution. Notably, among these cocatalysts, the Ni-based cocatalysts have attracted growing interest in photocatalytic H2 evolution owing to their superior features, which include low cost, easy fabrication and modification, and high efficiency [23]. In particular, these surface H2-evolution cocatalysts play multifunctional roles in enhancing the charge separation and improving the H2-evolution activity and stability of photocatalysts under illumination [68-71]. Accordingly, wholistic consideration and optimization of all these above processes during photocatalysis are crucial for developing highly efficient H2-evolution photocatalysts. Notably, in this review, the integration design of other modification strategies and the loading of suitable Ni-based cocatalysts will be thoroughly proposed and discussed.

Fig. 3. Semiconductor-based photocatalytic H2 evolution by using Ni cocatalyst.
2.2 Fundamentals of Ni-based H2-production electrocatalysts

Ni-based H2-production cocatalysts over semiconductor light harvesters are generally selected from the excellent electrocatalysts. In theory, any excellent H2-evolution electrocatalyst is a potential cocatalyst candidate that can boost the photocatalytic H2 evolution over semiconductors. Hence, the development of promising H2-evolution electrocatalysts on different electrodes should be highly encouraged, which can facilitate the exploitation of H2-evolution cocatalysts. Herein, the fundamentals of Ni-based H2-evolution electrocatalysts will be simply discussed to provide a direction for rational selection and design of the Ni-based H2-evolution cocatalysts. Since the early 1960s, the mechanism of alkaline HER on metallic Ni has been widely proposed to be Volmer-Tafel or Volmer-Heyrovsky, depending on the electrolyte pH (Eq. (1)-(5)) [16, 17]. Notably, both alkaline and acidic media reveal similar Tafel mechanisms (Eq. (3)). However, the Tafel process in acidic media occurs 2 orders of magnitude faster than that in alkaline electrolytes. Particularly, in the alkaline HER process, an HO-H dissociation reaction (Volmer step, Eq. (2)) is generally involved prior to the Tafel step (Eq. (3)). Clearly, the chemisorption of Had is crucial for the Tafel step. Thus, the selection of proper HER electrocatalysts could be guided by optimizing the surface chemisorption energy of H, Had, on different electrode materials. As shown in Fig. 4, Trasatti's volcano plot (cathodic HER current densities at a given overpotential vs. the metal-H binding energy), is a straightforward method of comparing and predicting the HER activity of a new metal or alloy [72]. In fact, as observed in Fig. 4, metallic Ni is the most active non-precious electrocatalyst in the alkaline HER process [16, 17, 73]. However, severe deactivation of metallic Ni, caused by the formation of hydride species, and rapid corrosion in acidic media have limited its largescale application [74]. Consequently, continuous efforts have been devoted to exploit more active, stable, and overall pH-applicable Ni-based H2-evolution electrocatalysts in recent years [9, 10, 14]. The reduction of a proton (Eq. (1), (3), and (4)) or a water molecule (Eq. (2), (3), and (5)) is the key step in the mechanism of H2 evolution in an acidic or alkaline electrolyte, respectively. For example, the famous NiO/Ni-CNT HER electrocatalyst exhibited 10 mA cm-2 current density at ~81 mV overpotential in alkaline media [75]. Ni, NiO, and oxidized CNT have been identified as the efficient active sites of the H adsorption step, the preferential absorbing region of the OH- produced by the Ni sites (i.e., the positive charge and higher number of empty d orbitals of Ni2+, stronger electrostatic affinity of NiO for OH- ions), and a substantial substrate for growing the NiO/Ni heterostructure, respectively. Until now, a combination of experimental and computational studies has revealed numerous Ni-based H2-evolution electrocatalysts [76]. Some of the popular representative Ni-based H2-evolution electrocatalysts are summarized in Table 1 according to their different compositions, including alloys/metals, carbides, nitrides, oxides, phosphides [77-79], sulfides, selenides, and complexes.

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Fig. 4. Trasatti's volcano plot for the HER over pure metals in acidic solutions [72].
Table 1
Typical earth-abundant Ni-based electrocatalysts for electrocatalytic H2 evolution.

Moreover, to further enhance the activity and stability of these H2-evolution electrocatalysts, five designing strategies have been developed, namely composition engineering, [149-157] nanostructure engineering [158-167], interfacial engineering [168-174], surface engineering, [175], and hybrid engineering [176-181] (Fig. 5). Composition engineering can be divided into three types, including doping (metal, nonmetal, and dual doping), introduction of defects/vacancies, and design of crystal phases and alloys. Clearly, Ni-based H2-evolution electrocatalysts composed of binary metal alloys or compounds, such as PtNi [80, 182], Ni-WN [82], Ni-Mo [89], Ni-Mo [17, 89], Ni-Co [183, 184], NiMoN [97], MoNiNC [105], CoNi(OH)x [110], W-doped Ni-P [116], NiP1.93Se0.07 [123], Ni-Co-P [124], NiFeP [18], Fe-Ni-S [136], Ni-W-S [20, 138], NiCo2S4 [140], Ni0.33Co0.67S2 [143], Ni0.33Co0.67Se2 [129], Fe(Ⅲ)-doped NiS2 nanosheets [144], NiCo2S4 double-shelled hollow nanospheres [141], Ni1-xCox Se2 [146], and Ni0.89Co0.11Se2 [146], have been widely exploited. Secondly, nanostructure engineering can be performed by controlling the facets, nanostructures, and pores or by tuning the dispersion, shape, and nanosize. Typically, various nanostructures, including Ni-Fe LDH hollow microspheres [83], NiCo2.7(OH)x nanocages [109], Ni2P nanosheets [114], NiPx nanospheres [122], and Ni3S2 nanosheets (210) [135], have been utilized in electrocatalytic H2 generation. Thirdly, interfacial engineering can be accomplished by constructing high-quality heterojunction interfaces. Commonly, several heterojunction interfaces such as MoNi4/MoO2@Ni [22], Ni(OH)2/MoS2[113], Ni3N/Ni [185], Pt/NiO@Ni [186], MoS2/Ni3S2 [187], hierarchical Ni3S2-NiOOH/Ni foam[112], Ni-P/MoSx [128], Co9S8-Nix Sy [130], and Ni/Ni3S2 [133] have been successfully constructed by coupling Ni-based and other types of electrocatalysts. As a typical example, Dai's group synthesized nanoscale NiO/Ni-CNT heterostructures via a low-pressure heat calcination route (Fig. 6) [75]. The NiO/Ni core shell-like structure formed over the mildly oxidized CNT could be clearly confirmed. Impressively, the NiO/Ni-CNT heterostructures could achieve an overpotential of less than 100 mV at the large current density of 100 mA cm-2. The interface of NiO and Ni was found to serve as active sites for the HER. The interfacial NiO sites with positive charge and greater number of unfilled d orbitals acted as adsorption sites for the OH- generated by H2O splitting preferentially through the strong electrostatic interactions, whereas a nearby Ni site would facilitate H adsorption and thus promote the Volmer step. However, the stability of NiO/Ni-CNT is not satisfactory. Subsequently, the chemically stable Cr2O3 shell has been demonstrated to improve the HER stability of the Ni/NiO heterostructure [108, 188], which could protect the Ni core from oxidation and prevent the NiO component from being reduced to metallic Ni, thus retaining the active Ni/NiO interface sites for durable HER in an alkaline electrolyzer. Similarly, Kuang et al. [131] prepared a bimetal (Ni and Mo) sulfide-based hybrid nanowire (NiS2/MoS2 HNW) heterostructure composed of NiS2 nanoparticles and MoS2 nanoplates via the in situ chemical vapor deposition process (Fig. 7(A) and (B)). The resulting NiS2/MoS2 HNW on a simple glassy C electrode shows a much smaller overpotential of 204 mV, along with a smaller Tafel slope of 65 mV dec-1 in alkaline media, owing to the formation of lattice interfaces of NiS2-MoS2 heterojunctions. Fourthly, surface engineering can be carried out by tailoring the surface oxidation state/roughness or creating functional groups or dangling bonds [189]. Finally, hybrid engineering of the Ni-based electrocatalysts can be performed through a hybrid of different cocatalysts or through a hybrid of electrocatalysts and nanocarbons [176]. For example, various nanocarbon materials have been used as conductive supports to develop a number of advanced hybrid H2-evolution electrocatalysts, such as FeNi/NC [81], Ni-RGO [84], CoNi@NC [90], Ce-Ni/RGO [91], NiMoNx/C [96], Ni-MoCx/C [103], Ni/NiO/N-rGO [107], Pt/Ni-MoCx/C black [190], Ni2P/C cloth [115], Co0.5Ni0.5P/CC, [121], Ni2-xCox P/rGO [129], Nix Sy nanowalls/N-doped graphene foam [132], S-Ni5P4 NPA/CP [134], WS2/graphene/Ni [139], Ni-W-S/CF [20], Ni-Mo-S/C, [142], and porous Ni3S2@NPC [145]. Notably, it is also expected that density functional theory (DFT) calculations can be used to aid in the design of new cocatalyst materials that render photocatalytic H2 generation more active and durable. Undoubtedly, these design and development strategies of Ni-based electrocatalysts could be imitated and extended to the rational construction and fabrication of Ni-based cocatalysts for highly efficient and durable photocatalytic H2 evolution.

Fig. 5. Design strategies for Ni-based H2-evolution electrocatalysts.
Fig. 6. (A) HRTEM image and (B) the corresponding EDX mapping image of NiO/Ni-CNT heterostructures. (C) Linear sweep voltammetry plot of various as-prepared catalysts. Electrolyte: 1 mol/L KOH, catalyst loading: 0.28 mg cm-2, and sweep rate: 1 mV s-1.[75]
Fig. 7. (A) TEM, and (B) HRTEM images of NiS2/MoS2 HNW. (C) Polarization curves and (D) the corresponding Tafel plots of NiS2/MoS2, NiMoO4, MoS2, NiS2, and Pt/C electrodes at a scan rate of 5 mV s-1 in 1.0 mol/L KOH [131].
2.3 Roles and challenges with Ni-based H2-production cocatalysts

As is well known, according to the active site, hydrogenases, which can convert the released protons into H2, can be classified into [NiFe], [FeFe], and [Fe] hydrogenases. The structures of [NiFe] and [FeFe] hydrogenases are shown in Fig. 8 [191]. Clearly, as observed from this figure, the [NiFe] center in [NiFe] hydrogenase contains the Ni ion, implying that Ni is active towards the production of molecular H2. Luckily, Ni-based H2-production electrocatalysts have been widely investigated, and can be also employed as H2-production cocatalysts on photocatalyst particles for realizing highly improved photocatalytic activities for H2 evolution. The roles of Ni-based cocatalysts in the photocatalytic H2 evolution are summarized in Fig. 9. Clearly, apart from increasing the number of active sites for H2 evolution, the Ni-based cocatalysts can also play various important roles in improving the photocatalytic efficiency, such as promoting charge separation and transport, lowering the electrochemical H2-evolution overpotential, enhancing the catalytic H2-evolution kinetics by decreasing the activation energy, and reducing the fabrication costs. Thus, it is obvious that suitable Ni-based cocatalysts play decisive roles in achieving highly active low-cost photocatalytic H2 evolution. Hence, the design, exploitation, and application of Ni-based earth-abundant H2-production electrocatalysts in photocatalytic H2 evolution should be further studied.

Fig. 8. Structures of [NiFe] hydrogenase and [FeFe] hydrogenase [191].
Fig. 9. Roles of Ni-based cocatalysts in photocatalytic H2 evolution.

However, the design of highly efficient Ni-based H2-production cocatalysts for photocatalysis is more challenging than the design of Ni-based H2-production electrocatalysts, owing to the complex separation and transfer of charge carriers between the semiconductor light harvesters and the cocatalysts during the photocatalytic processes. In other words, electrons must first be generated and separated in the semiconductor light harvesters, and then transferred into the Ni-based H2-production cocatalysts to drive the final surface electrocatalytic reactions. At this point, for designing highly efficient photocatalytic H2-evolution systems, surface electrocatalytic H2 production over Ni-based electrocatalysts, charge separation/transfer involving the light-harvesting semiconductors, and the interfacial charge separation between them should be simultaneously considered and optimized. However, previous investigations were more focused on the design and optimization of Ni-based cocatalysts. For example, many Ni-based H2-evolution cocatalysts are simply loaded onto the surfaces of semiconductors to boost the photocatalytic H2 generation. Therefore, it is not surprising that the H2-evolution activity is still very low in many photocatalytic systems involving the Ni-based cocatalysts. This review will highlight the various potential modification strategies based on system integration to simultaneously optimize the charge separation/transfer in photocatalytic processes and the active sites in the Ni-based cocatalysts, which will be thoroughly discussed in the following sections. It is expected that these considerations will provide helpful insights and practical guidance on the design and development of highly efficient photocatalytic H2-evolution systems involving Ni-based cocatalysts.

3 Insights into the mechanism of H2 production over Ni-based cocatalysts
3.1 Identification of the H2-evolution active sites

Precise identification of the H2-evolution active sites is crucial for rationally designing and synthesizing highly active and durable Ni-based electrocatalysts or cocatalysts for high-efficiency electrocatalytic or photocatalytic H2 production. Previously, for electrocatalytic H2 production by using molecular complexes, it was revealed that the reduction and initial protonation of the metallic center could generate a common metal hydride intermediate, which could further lead to the formation of H2 by a second protonation step.[192-195] However, studies are limited on the nature and structural features of the H2-evolution active sites in Ni-based electrocatalysts, as well as on the structural and bonding scenarios possible at the active sites of the cocatalysts under light irradiation. Recently, various in situ observation technologies, such as in situ XAS studies, in situ EPR measurements, and operando Raman spectroscopy, have been used for identifying the exact active sites for H2 evolution over Ni-based cocatalysts. These in situ technologies can provide more direct experimental evidences for confirming the exact charge separation and transfer mechanisms. On one hand, several in situ techniques have been recently employed to precisely identify the actual active sites of Ni-based electrocatalysts and the active species involved in the electrocatalytic H2-evolution process. For example, to identify the actual active sites, Hu et al. successfully synthesized 2D metallic Ni nanosheets by transforming Ni-thiolate coordination polymer by using 1, 4-benzenedithiol as the ligand (Fig. 10(A)) [111]. The resulting catalyst could reveal a current density of 10 mA cm-2 at an extremely low overpotential of 80 mV for the electrocatalytic HER (Fig. 10(B)). In situ XAS studies of the X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) (Fig. 10(C)) and X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) (Fig. 10(D)) spectra revealed that ultrathin Ni NSs with large areas acted as the actual catalytically active sites for H2 generation. Notably, the trace S adsorbed on the Ni surface plays a crucial role in promoting water dissociation (Fig. 10(E)). This study highlights the deep investigations and the importance of the surface coordination chemistry of electrocatalysts in increasing the HER activity. Similarly, Ma et al. synthesized 2D Ni disulfide (NiS2) by using Ni(OH)2 on a Ni foam as the substrate for electrocatalytic HER (Fig. 11(A)) [196]. The resulting catalyst exhibited superior activity, with an overpotential of 67 mV at 10 mA cm-2 (Fig. 11(B)). XANES/EXAFS spectra were used to reveal the different coordination environments of the samples before and after activation (Fig. 11(C) and (D)). The in situ XAS studies confirmed the presence of Ni-S and Ni-Ni bonds in the active sample, further suggesting that the metallic Ni0 with a trace amount of sulfide should be the possible active sites. All these results highlight the significance of in situ techniques in identifying the actual HER active sites. On the other hand, the in situ techniques could also be applied to the identification of the active sites of Ni-based cocatalysts for photocatalytic H2 evolution. For example, Indra et al. demonstrated that Ni-based cocatalysts could serve as the active catalytic species on the surface of porous g-C3N4. They photodeposited Ni species as the cocatalysts on the surface of g-C3N4, based on XPS and EPR tests (Fig. 12(A) and (B)), which significantly prolonged the illumination time. A continuous increase in the Ni0 signal intensity was detected, though not all the Ni2+ species were reduced to Ni0 at the same time. Ni nanoparticles are formed only during the photocatalytic process, and reoxidize quickly when exposed to air during isolation. Therefore, the Ni2+ species could act as a cocatalyst to reduce protons to H2 (Fig. 12(C) and 7(D)) [197]. Additionally, it should be pointed out that a Raman peak was recorded at 2530 cm-1 at the potentials relevant to H2 evolution, which corresponded to the S-H stretching vibration of the amorphous MoSx -H moieties, as revealed by the operando Raman spectroscopy [198]. The absence of Mo-H (or Mo-D) stretching vibrations rules out the possibility of Mo centers acting as catalytic H2-production sites. These results directly confirmed for the first time that the S atoms in amorphous MoSx are the actual active H2-evolution sites. In theory, the exact active sites of Ni-based cocatalysts could also be revealed by operando Raman spectroscopy, which is highly desirable. Additionally, based on first-principles method, it was demonstrated that increasing the coverage of O atoms on the surface of Ni atoms could lead to the increase of ΔGH* [199], suggesting that partially oxidized Ni(111) surfaces with a considerably low coverage of O are theoretically the best catalytic centers for the electrocatalytic HER owing to the optimal electronic properties. In future, the combination of various in situ observation technologies and first-principles method should be a promising approach to identifying the exact H2-evolution active sites over Ni-based cocatalysts.

Fig. 10. (A) SEM image of Ni-BDT. (B) Polarization curves of Ni(OH)2, Ni-BDT, Ni-BDT-A, and Pt/C on a C cloth electrode in 1 mol/L KOH. (C) XANES and (D) EXAFS spectra of a Ni foil and Ni-BDT before and after electroactivation. (E) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of Ni-BDT and in situ electrochemical production of Ni NSs with Sadδ- [111].
Fig. 11. (A) SEM images of 2D Ni disulfide (NiS2) nanosheets. (B) Polarization curves of Ni foam-Ni(OH)2, Ni foam-NiS2, Ni foam-NiS2-A (cathodic activation for 5 h at the current density of 20 mA cm-2), and Pt/C in 1 mol/L KOH. Electrochemical in situ (C) XANES and (D) EXAFS spectra of a Ni foil and CC-NiS2 before and after activation [196].
Fig. 12. (A) Ex situ EPR spectra of catalysts, compared with porous g-C3N4. (B) Ni 2p XPS pattern. (C) Double integral of the CB-e- EPR signal of the catalysts during visible light irradiation (black) and after light switch-off (red). The background signals in the dark were subtracted. The inset shows an example of an analyzed CB-e- signal. (D) Mechanism of the H2 generation reaction over a photocatalyst [197].
3.2 Investigation of the reaction pathways

Investigation of the reaction pathways over the active sites of Ni-based electrocatalysts or cocatalysts guides the design and development of more efficient electrocatalytic or photocatalytic systems for H2 generation. In this regard, DFT should be a promising tool for revealing the exact reaction pathways leading to H2 evolution. For instance, DFT calculations clearly revealed that the threefold hollow (TFH) Ni site and the neighboring P site are responsible for the adsorption of H [200]. Importantly, the H atom is mostly adsorbed on the TFH Ni sites on the (0 0 1) or (0 0 2) surface, due to unstable H adsorption on the P sites of the (0 0 2) and (0 0 1) surfaces [200]. Particularly, a high electron density in the d-band that extends to near the Fermi level was confirmed for the Ni2P (001) surface, resulting in a strong interaction with H. In comparison with the simultaneous H adsorption reaction pathway over the Ni2P (001) surface (Fig. 13(A)), a lower reaction barrier or activation energy was observed for consecutive H adsorptions on TFH Ni sites and then on P(Ⅱ) sites on the Ni2P (001) surface (Fig. 13(B)), which indicated that the consecutive adsorption reaction pathway over the Ni2P surface might actually occur before the Volmer step. In future, it is expected that a combination of DFT calculations and in situ techniques should be applied to identify the exact active sites and reaction pathways of Ni-based cocatalysts under light irradiation, which could be beneficial for precise exploitation of efficient next-generation semiconductor-cocatalyst composite H2-generation systems.

Fig. 13. Calculated energy profiles for the HER via (A) simultaneous H adsorption and (B) consecutive H adsorption mechanisms [200].
4 Strategies for improving H2 production over Ni-based cocatalysts

To date, various Ni-based electrocatalysts, including Ni [197, 201-204], Ni(OH)x [9, 205-218], NiSx [219-232], [Ni(TEOA)2]Cl2 [233], NiOx [234], NiBx [235, 236], Ni3C [237, 238], NiPx [197, 239-245], and Ni(dmgH)2 [246, 247] have been widely utilized as cocatalysts to increase the photocatalytic H2-evolution activity over various organic and inorganic semiconductors [23]. Their activities are summarized in Table 2. From the table, it should be obvious that a simple combination of a cocatalyst and a semiconductor is involved in many studies. Herein, several original binary systems should be highlighted. For example, in 2010, Xu and coworkers demonstrated for the first time that 1.2 mol% of NiS modified CdS NPs showed the highest H2 production rate of 2.18 mmol h-1, with a QE of 51.3% at 420 nm (Fig. 14) [248]. Subsequently, in 2013, the same group first reported that 1.1 wt% NiS cocatalyst on g-C3N4 could achieve a H2-production rate of 48.2 mmol h-1, corresponding to an apparent quantum efficiency of 1.9% at 440 nm (Fig. 15) [219]. In 2011, Yu et al. found that CdS nanorods loaded with 23 mol% Ni(OH)2 cocatalyst revealed the highest visible-light H2-production rate of 5085 μmol h-1 g-1, with a QE of 28% at 420 nm (Fig. 16(A) and (B)) [212]. In 2013, Yu et al. first demonstrated that 0.5 mol% Ni(OH)2-modified g-C3N4 composite photocatalyst exhibited the highest H2-production rate of 7.6 μmol h-1 (with an AQE of 1.1% at 420 nm, which is very close to that of 1.0 wt% Pt/g-C3N4 (8.2 μmol h-1) (Fig. 16(C) and (D)) [205]. In 2014, Cao et al. for the first time reported that a combination of monodispersed Ni2P nanoparticles, as the cocatalyst, and CdS nanorods, as the photosensitizer, was found to result in highly active and stable photocatalytic H2 evolution from an acidic aqueous solution, with a TON of 26, 300 for the first 20 h of irradiation (Fig. 17) [249]. In 2018, Li's group for the first time demonstrated that a hybrid of 1% Ni3C cocatalyst and CdS nanosheets exhibited the highest photocatalytic H2 evolution rates of 357 and 450 μmol h-1 in 0.25 mol/L Na2S-Na2SO3 and lactic acid, with apparent quantum yields (AQYs) of 7.58% and 8.72% at 420 nm, respectively (Fig. 18(A) and (B)) [238]. More recently, the same group reported that 15 wt% Ni3C cocatalyst nanoparticles decorated on g-C3N4 could display the maximum H2-production rate of 15.18 mol h-1, corresponding to an AQY of 0.40% at 420 nm [237]. These investigations perfectly highlighted the innovation of direct integration of Ni-based cocatalysts, inspired by the novel Ni-based H2-evolution electrocatalysts. However, more attention should be paid to further improving these simple hybrids of cocatalysts and semiconductors for achieving more efficient and durable photocatalytic H2 evolution. Therefore, in this section, the various strategies for improving H2 production over Ni-based cocatalysts will be thoroughly discussed, which should be fully integrated and well designed to maximize the H2-evolution over different cocatalysts.

Table 2
Typical earth-abundant Ni-based co-catalysts for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution.
Fig. 14. (A) HRTEM and (B) TEM images of a NiS (1.2 mol%)/CdS sample. Photocatalytic H2-evolution rates of (C) CdS NPs with different NiS contents and (D) different photocatalysts (NiS + CdS* represents the physical mixture of CdS and NiS) [248].
Fig. 15. (A) HRTEM and (B) energy-filtered elemental mapping images (Ni: green, S: orange, N: blue) of NiS (1.25%)/C3N4. (C) NiS loading content-dependent H2-evolution rate for the first 4 h of irradiation. (D) Wavelength-dependent QE over NiS (1.25%)/C3N4 [219].
Fig. 16. (A) Visible-light photocatalytic H2-production rates of SNx samples and 1 wt% Pt/CdS (X represents the nominal molar ratios of Ni(OH)2 to (CdS+Ni(OH)2)). (B) Photocatalytic H2-production mechanism over Ni(OH)2-modified CdS nanorods.[212] (C) Comparison of the photocatalytic H2-production activities of Nix (x, Ni(OH)2 to (g-C3N4+Ni(OH)2) was 0, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 1.6, and 10 (mol%)) and Pt-deposited g-C3N4 samples in triethanolamine aqueous solution.(D) Charge separation mechanisms in the Ni(OH)2/g-C3N4 system under visible light irradiation [205].
Fig. 17. (A) TEM and (b) HRTEM images of Ni2P NPs. (C) The TON of the system containing 1.0×10-6 mol/L Ni2P NPs and different concentrations of CdS NRs at pH 3.0. (D) Photocatalytic H2-evolution rates over different photocatalysts after 10 h of irradiation at pH 3.0 [249].
Fig. 18. (A) Photocatalytic H2-evolution rates of different samples in 0.25 mol/L Na2S-Na2SO3 or 10 vol% lactic acid aqueous solution. (B) Wavelength-dependent apparent quantum efficiencies of CdS-1%Ni3C in 0.25 mol/L Na2S-Na2SO3 [238]. (C) Average H2-evolution rates over different CNix (where x represents the weight fraction of Ni3C) samples. (C) Wavelength-dependent apparent quantum efficiencies of the CNi15 sample [237].
4.1 Strategies based on increasing light harvesting
4.1.1 Designing hierarchical photocatalysts

As is well known, the unique structural features of hierarchical micro-/nano- photocatalysts can simultaneously enhance the light harvesting and improve the various types of kinetic factors in photocatalysis (such as the charge carrier kinetics, adsorption and diffusion kinetics of reactants, and surface reaction kinetics) [28, 359-362]. Therefore, the fabrication of hierarchical photocatalysts has become a popular strategy to improve the photocatalytic H2 production over Ni-based cocatalysts. For example, Zhang et al. prepared hierarchical core/shell hydrogenated TiO2 (H-TiO2) nanothorns/C nanofiber (CNF) composites through the solvothermal method (Fig. 19(A) and (B)). The optimal NiS quantum dot (QD)-decorated H-TiO2/CNF composite could achieve an enhancement of about 12.3 times in the solar-driven H2 generation rate under AM 1.5 irradiation, in comparison with that of TiO2/CNF nanostructures (Fig. 19(C)). It is believed that the unique architecture leads to many advantageous features such as greatly improved charge transfer and separation, increased accessible surface area and surface donor density of the composites, and increased light harvesting, all of which result in enhanced photoactivity (Fig. 19(D)). In another study, Li et al. [208] synthesized layer-like Ni(OH)2-decorated ZnIn2S4 sub-microsphere photocatalysts for increasing the photocatalytic H2 production via a facile in situ deposition method (Fig. 20(A)). Loading of 5 mol% Ni(OH)2 cocatalysts over the ZnIn2S4 sample could achieve an 18-fold activity enhancement for photocatalytic H2 production (Fig. 20(B)). Apparently, after introducing Ni(OH)2 into ZnIn2S4, the interfacial charge transfer process, H2-evolution kinetics, and light harvesting were simultaneously improved (Fig. 20(C) and (D)), which were responsible for the activity enhancement. Similarly, Chen et al. synthesized CdS photocatalysts modified with hierarchical flowerlike Ni/Ni(OH)2 cocatalysts. The optimal H2-evolution rate of Ni/Ni(OH)2/CdS (3735 μmol g-1 h-1) photocatalyst is 1.7 times higher than that of CdS/Pt photocatalyst. The UV-vis diffuse reflection spectrum reveals an improved absorbance in the visible-light region, indicating that the hierarchical flowerlike Ni/Ni(OH)2 cocatalysts could improve the light-absorption ability of the CdS photocatalysts. Furthermore, the CB level of pure CdS (-0.7 V) is of a higher magnitude than the potential of Ni2+/Ni (-0.23 V vs. SHE), indicating that Ni can serve as a cocatalyst to accelerate the separation and transfer of photogenerated electrons from the CB of CdS to the Ni/Ni(OH)2 cocatalyst [262]. Additionally, hierarchical Ni-doped ZnIn2S4 microspheres [340], Ni (Ni2+)-salt-modified CdE (E = Te, Se, and S) QD hollow nanospheres [348], Ni-supported CdIn2S4 spongy-like spheres [251], and Nix P cocatalyst embedded 3D N-TiO2/g-C3N4 heterojunctions [322] have been also demonstrated to exhibit significantly enhanced photocatalytic H2-evolution activity owing to the improved light harvesting and charge separation. In future, it is expected that hierarchical photocatalysts with Ni-based cocatalysts could be widely designed and utilized in photocatalytic H2 generation.

Fig. 19. (A) Fabrication process and (B) SEM images of NiS quantum dot-decorated H-TiO2/C nanofibers (NiS/H-TiO2/CNFs). (C) Average H2 evolution rate over different samples (30 mg of catalyst) and (D) the charge-transfer processes in NiS/H-TiO2/CNFs under AM 1.5 irradiation [363].
Fig. 20. (A) SEM images of 5 mol% Ni(OH)2-ZnIn2S4. (B) H2-evolution rate over ZnIn2S4 modified with different amounts of Ni(OH)2 cocatalyst. (C) Schematic mechanism of the charge transfer and separation, and (D) visible-light photocatalytic H2 production over the Ni(OH)2-ZnIn2S4 system [208].
4.1.2 Utilizing surface sensitization

Besides the hierarchical nanostructures, utilization of surface sensitization has been demonstrated to be an efficient strategy to increase the light harvesting for enhancing the photocatalytic H2-generation activity over wide bandgap semiconductors. Clearly, three typical sensitization strategies, namely, dye and QD sensitization, and introduction of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effect, have been developed for the fabrication of visible-light-driven photocatalysts for various applications [364]. Among them, dye sensitization has been demonstrated to be the simplest way to enhance the visible-light absorption of wide bandgap semiconductors. For example, Kong et al. demonstrated that the hybrid of graphene with NiSx cocatalyst obtained by in situ chemical deposition method could result in a two-fold improvement in the H2 generation rate (Fig. 21(A)), with the highest quantum efficiency of 32.5% at 430 nm, compared with that of pristine NiSx under visible light irradiation [365]. Thus, confined growth of NiSx on a 2D conductive graphene substrate could greatly improve the transfer of photoelectrons from the excited Eosin Y (EY) to the NiSx cocatalyst, leading to greatly enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution (Fig. 21(B)). In this work, the earth-abundant NiSx/G nanohybrid represents a highly efficient cocatalyst for low-cost photocatalytic H2 generation in dye sensitization systems. In another example, Peng et al. used the Ni complex ([BzPyN(CH3)2]2[Ni(mnt)2]1(mnt2-= maleonitriledithiolate)) as the photosensitizer to enhance the photocatalytic performance of CdS nanorods. The results revealed that the optimized photocatalytic H2-evolution performance of the CdS-Ni complex could reach 350 μmol h-1, with an average value of the AQY of ~18% after 10 h of irradiation. According to the UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra obtained, the loading of the Ni complex could significantly improve the light absorption of the CdS nanorods, thus leading to the photogeneration of more electron-hole pairs [350]. Furthermore, CdS QDs have been employed to sensitize various semiconductors with wide bandgaps, such as TiO2 and g-C3N4, for enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution [366-370]. Wang et al. [315] fabricated CdS QD-sensitized TiO2 hybrid photocatalysts with dual Ni(OH)2 and CNT cocatalysts that were anchored on the TiO2 surface for photocatalytic H2 generation. The synergetic effect of the introduced Ni(OH)2 and CNT cocatalysts resulted in an optimal photocatalytic H2-evolution rate of 12 mmol g-1 h-1 (Fig. 22(A)). The UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra clearly confirmed the role of the CdS QDs in visible-light sensitization (Fig. 22(B)), whereas the time-resolved PL emission decay curve revealed improved interfacial charge separation and transfer (Fig. 22(C)). As a result, increased separation efficiency and enhanced visible-light absorbance led to a fundamental improvement in the visible-light H2-evolution activity (Fig. 22D). This study might provide some interesting insights into designing and constructing visible-light-responsive photocatalyst composites for realizing enhanced solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiencies. Additionally, it is known that the localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) in several metals (e.g., Au, Ag, Cu, and Bi) [371-383] and nonmetal compounds (e.g., W18O49 and Mox W1-xO3-y) [384-388] could be used to sensitize wide bandgap semiconductors and achieve visible-light or NIR photocatalysis. Therefore, combining plasmonic materials and Ni-based cocatalysts should be an interesting strategy to boost visible-light H2 production. For instance, Luna et al. successfully synthesized Au and/or Ni nanoparticle-loaded TiO2 (commercial P25) photocatalysts for enhanced H2 production [275]. The highest H2-production rate from aqueous methanol solution was obtained over NiAu/TiO2 catalyst (Ni:Au atomic ratio of 5:1 and total metal content 0.5-1 at%) (Fig. 23(A) and (B)). A plasmonic band in the wavelength region of 540-560 nm was clearly observed for NiAu/TiO2, suggesting that LSPR could improve the absorption of visible light (Fig. 23(C)). Thus, the synergetic effect between the Au NPs and Ni(O) clusters on TiO2 could be attributed to the enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution. Similarly, the enhanced H2-evolution photoactivities of the Au-Cu2O and Au-NiO nanoparticles deposited on TiO2 were confirmed, and attributed to a synergetic effect between the enhanced electron transfer from TiO2 to the Au-MxOy system and the LSPR of the Au nanoparticles [303]. In future, all of these sensitization strategies are expected to be coupled with the Ni-based cocatalysts and deeply studied with respect to the mechanism.

Fig. 21. (A) Photocatalytic H2 evolution over different EY (1.0×10-3 mol l-1)-photosensitized systems. Conditions: 100 ml of a 10% (v/v) aqueous TEOA solution, pH 7, λ ≥ 420 nm, the NiSx:graphene weight ratio is 46.7% in NiSx/G. (B) Mechanism of H2 evolution over EY-NiSx/G photocatalyst [365].
Fig. 22. (A) Photocatalytic H2 evolution activity of TiO2/1 wt% CNT/CdS with TiO2-4 wt% Ni(OH)2/CdS, and TiO2-4 wt% Ni(OH)2/1 wt% CNT/CdS. Conditions: 0.05 g catalyst, 0.1 mol/L Na2S-Na2SO3 in 230 ml deionized water, 300 W Xe lamp (λ > 400 nm). (B) UV-vis spectra and (C) time-resolved PL emission decay curves (with an excitation wavelength of 450 nm) of different samples. (D) Schematic mechanisms of the charge separation and visible-light H2 evolution over the TiO2-Ni(OH)2/CNT/CdS photocatalyst [315].
Fig. 23. (A) Photocatalytic H2-production rates of different samples from 50 vol% aqueous methanol solution. (B) Time-dependent photocatalytic H2 generation over samples modified with 0.5 at% metal obtained from 10 vol% aqueous methanol. (C) UV-vis absorbance spectra and (D) the proposed photocatalytic H2-production mechanism for x-NiAu/TiO2 (x = 0.1, 0.5, and 1) [275].
4.1.3 Developing wide spectrum photocatalysts

Developing wide spectrum photocatalysts is another strategy to directly increase the visible- and/or NIR-light harvesting for enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution. Simply speaking, several popular strategies, including impurity doping, [258, 286, 306, 326, 336, 340, 344] introduction of structural defects [9, 344, 389, 390], and formation of solid solutions [231, 280, 391], have been used to develop wide spectrum semiconductors. Typically, various metals and non-metals have been doped into different semiconductors such as TiO2 [392-397] and g-C3N4 [398-405] to fundamentally narrow their bandgaps and thus enhance the visible-light absorbance and photoactivity. In fact, in some cases, the doped Ni species in sulfide and oxide semiconductors themselves could act as cocatalysts in increasing the photocatalytic H2 evolution.[336, 340, 406-408] Further loading of the Ni-based cocatalyst over these wide spectrum semiconductors could lead to improved photocatalytic H2 evolution [258]. More interestingly, Ni2+-to-metal charge-transfer excitation and the substitution of Ni2+ in semiconductor photocatalysts can narrow the bandgap energy of a semiconductor, resulting in visible-light photocatalytic activity [409, 410]. For example, Baliarsingh and his coworkers prepared Ni-Zn/Cr-CO32- LDH photocatalysts for visible light photocatalytic H2 evolution (Fig. 24(A)) [411]. The Ni-Zn/Cr-CO32- LDHs with the Ni: Zn ratio of 75: 25 (LDH4) show the highest photocatalytic activity of 1915 μmol g-1 h-1 (Fig. 24(B)). The diffuse reflectance spectra indicated that the metal-to-metal charge-transfer excitation from Zn/Ni-O-Cr to Zn/NiⅠ-O-Cr could improve the absorption in the visible-light region. Furthermore, the partially filled 3d orbitals of Ni2+ played an important role in water splitting. The bands of Ni-3d-t2g (-0.23 V) are energetically lower than the H+/H2 reduction level. The photogenerated electrons can be easily excited from Ni-3d-t2g to Ni-3deg owing to the d-d transition in the MO6 octahedron (Fig. 24(C)). In addition, the oxo-bridged bimetallic linkages Ni()-O-Cr() could serve as catalytic redox centers. Therefore, the substitution of Ni2+ could narrow thebandgap energy and improve the photoactivity [411] (Fig. 24(D)). Apart from the modification of wide bandgap semiconductors, developing new wide spectrum photocatalysts, such as upconversion nanocrystals [412-414] and C QDs [415-418], has also attracted increasing attention. Considering the unique tunable bandgaps of graphene QDs (GQDs) with high water-solubility, biocompatibility, and photostability, Zhu et al. for the first time designed and fabricated the hybrid of Ni2P cocatalyst nanoparticles and OH-functionalized GQD (OH-GQD) photosensitizer for photocatalytic H2 production under λ > 420 nm light [7]. Under optimal conditions, the highest H2 evolution rate of 1567 µmol h-1 g-1 was achieved, which is ~94 times higher than that of bare OH-GQDs and comparable with the catalytic activity of 1 wt% Pt/OH-GQDs sample (1683 µmol h-1 g-1) (Fig. 25(A) and (B)). The absorption spectrum of the OH-GQDs reveals a strong emission peak at ~540 nm, which corresponds to a bandgap of about 2.3 eV (Fig. 25(C)). After adding Ni2P to the OH-GQD solution, the decrease in the emission intensity clearly indicates that electron-hole separation is promoted. It was demonstrated that Ni2P can efficiently promote the charge-carrier separation and the photocatalytic H2-evolution activity of OH-GQDs (Fig. 25(D)). This study suggested that metal-free OH-GQDs could be used to develop highly effective photocatalytic H2 evolution systems by loading with suitable low-cost cocatalysts. Additionally, black P nanosheets have been widely employed as an exciting wide spectrum semiconductor for NIR photocatalytic H2 production [419-428]. More importantly, earth-abundant cocatalysts such as CoP [429] and WS2 [430] have been coupled with black P nanosheets for enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution. Thus, it is expected that an increasing number of wide spectrum semiconductors can be integrated with Ni-based cocatalysts for high-efficiency photocatalytic H2 evolution.

Fig. 24. (A) XRD patterns of different photocatalysts, (B) the amount of H2 evolved, (C) overall mechanism of H2 evolution, and (D) the specific absorption band edges calculated for the as-prepared photocatalysts. The samples were fabricated in Ni2+: Zn2+ proportions of 0: 100, 25: 75, 50: 50, 75: 25, and 100: 0, which were denoted as LDH1, LDH2, LDH3, LDH4, and LDH5, respectively [411].
Fig. 25. (A) Visible-light H2 production rate on 20 wt% Ni2P/OH-GQD photocatalyst by using different hole scavengers (TEOA, VC, methanol, and Na2S/Na2SO3) (λ > 420 nm). (b) Ni2P content-dependent rate of H2 evolution over Ni2P/OH-GQD photocatalyst (λ > 420 nm). Conditions: 6 mg photocatalyst, 1.2 mg cocatalyst, and 2 ml TEOA in 18 ml deionized water. (C) Spectral performance of pure OH-GQDs and 20 wt% Ni2P/OH-GQD photocatalyst at an excitation wavelength of 315 nm at room temperature. (D) Schematic mechanism of visible-light photocatalytic H2 evolution over Ni2P/OH-GQDs [7].
4.2 Strategies based on enhancing charge separation
4.2.1 Fabricating unique nanostructures

Fabricating unique nanostructures has long been considered to be an advanced approach to shortening the transport distance and improving the separation of the photogenerated charge carriers, which could fundamentally improve the overall photocatalytic efficiency [27, 431-434]. Therefore, designing unique semiconductor nanostructures is also beneficial in enhancing the photocatalytic H2 evolution over loaded Ni-based cocatalysts. To date, various kinds of semiconductor nanostructures, such as 0D QDs, 1D nanorods/nanowires, 2D nanosheets/nanoplates, and their assembled 3D structures, have been widely coupled with Ni-based cocatalysts to achieve enhanced photocatalytic H2 generation. Typically, Ni-based cocatalysts have been widely utilized to boost the photocatalytic H2 generation over different sulfide QDs. For example, Li and his coworkers synthesized Nih-CdSe/CdS core/shell hybrid, which was obtained from CdSe QDs stabilized by MPA and NiCl2·6H2O [227]. The maximum H2-evolution rate of Nih-CdSe/CdS core/shell hybrid could reach 153 μmol mg-1 h-1 (Fig. 26(A)). The TON of the CdSe QDs and Ni could reach 15, 340 and 18, 000, respectively. The results revealed that the introduced Ni could enhance the absorptions of MPA-CdSe QDs and produce a redshift in them. Thus, the excellent photocatalytic performance could be attributed to the strong electronic interaction between the MPA-CdSe QDs and Ni2+ ions (Fig. 26(B) and (C)). The nanosecond transient absorption results in effective photogenerated charge transfer from the excited MPA-CdSe QDs to the Ni2+ active sites to produce H2 (Fig. 26D). Notably, in this example, the doped Ni2+ ions played bifunctional roles in enhancing the photocatalytic H2 evolution, acting as both the doping element and the cocatalyst. In another example, Li et al. [348] synthesized CdTe hollow nanospheres with Nih-QDs for photocatalytic H2 evolution. The nanospheres with the diameter of 10 to 20 nm and a shell thickness of 3 to 6 nm showed excellent photocatalytic performances (Fig. 27(A) and (B)). It was found that the formation of the hollow structure resulted from H2 gas bubbles. More importantly, compared with other ions, Ni2+ shows the best performance towards H2 production. For the other ions, no hollow nanospheres could be found in the TEM images. These results suggest that the photocatalytic H2 bubbles are important for assembling QDs into hollow nanospheres. Furthermore, the CB of the MPA-CdTe QDs is more negative than the redox potential of the Ni2+/Ni0 couple. Therefore, electrons could effectively transfer from the MPA-CdTe QDs to the Ni2+ to generate H2 (Fig. 27(C)). Thus, the photocatalyst exhibited an excellent performance (Fig. 27(D)). Notably, the H2 bubbles produced in situ under visible light irradiation may act as the centers of Nih-QD assembly (Fig. 27(E)). In other words, the Ni2+ species as cocatalysts over various semiconductor QDs have been demonstrated to be excellent photocatalytic H2-generation systems, and should find more extensive application for practical photocatalytic H2 evolution.

Fig. 26. (A) H2 evolution over as-prepared samples, (B) UV-vis absorption spectra, and (C) emission spectra of MPA-CdSe QDs (5.0×10-6 mol/L) in the presence of Ni2+ ions (0 to 2.1×10-4 mol/L) in H2O. (D) Proposed mechanism of H2 formation involving Nih-CdSe/CdS core/shell photocatalyst [227].
Fig. 27. HRTEM images of (A) and (B) Nih hollow nanospheres, (C) emission decays of MPA-CdTe QDs (2.4 × 10-7 mol/L) of H2A (0 to 3.6 × 10-3 mol/L), (D) visible light intensity dependence on H2 evolution, and (E) proposed mechanism of H2 formation involving Nih-QD CdE nanosphere photocatalyst [348].

Apart from QDs, hybrids of 1D semiconductor nanorods/nanowires and Ni-based cocatalysts have been extensively constructed and applied in photocatalytic H2 production. In general, the unique 1D semiconductor nanostructures possess several favorable features, including high accessible surface area, preferential electrical transport in the axial direction, and small transport distance in the radial direction, for improving the separation and transfer of photogenerated charge carriers from the semiconductor to the cocatalyst, thus achieving improved overall photoactivity [10, 27, 435-439]. For instance, Sun et al. synthesized crystalline Ni2P cocatalysts to modify CdS nanorods for photocatalytic water splitting leading to H2 evolution [329]. Loading of crystalline Ni2P cocatalysts of size 10 nm at 0.5 wt% could result in an activity of about 1200 μmol mg-1 h-1 (Fig. 28(A) and (B)) [329]. The TON of Ni2P could reach 3.27×106 in 90 h, with a TOF of 36, 400. Time-resolved photoluminescence suggested that the photogenerated charges could be efficiently transferred from the CdS nanorods to the surface of the crystalline Ni2P cocatalyst (Fig. 28(C) and (D)). The results confirmed that the Ni2P cocatalyst could markedly improve the electron transfer and utilization in 1D CdS nanorods, thus resulting in significantly enhanced photocatalytic activity. More interestingly, enhancement in the hole transfer and utilization has also been demonstrated to be crucial in obtaining a much superior H2-evolution photoactivity. Simon et al. impressively used Ni cocatalysts to accelerate the hole transfer on the oxidation side of 1D CdS nanorods. They replaced the slow hole-transfer process with two faster processes that involved a redox mediator and Ni cocatalysts (Fig. 29(A)) [255]. In this system, the value of pH plays an important role in achieving the highest formation rate of 63 mmol g-1 h-1, with the AQY exceeding 53% at 447 nm (Fig. 29(B)). Apparently, the photoexcited hole transfer from the semiconductor photocatalyst surface to the scavenger strongly depends on the redox couple ·OH/-OH operating as a shuttle, in which the ·OH is generated as an intermediate during the oxidation process. The decreasing driving force for H+ reduction by the CB electrons seems to not affect the higher H2-production rate, confirming that the rate-limiting step is the hole transfer (Fig. 29(C)). An enhanced PL intensity corresponding to the production of ·OH and the accumulation of the fluorescent TA derivative (Fig. 29(D)) was clearly detected. Thus, a two-step mechanism of hole transfer employing a redox shuttle leads to a significantly enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution with Ni cocatalyst. This study opens new pathways to improve the activity and long-term photostability by boosting the hole transfer on the oxidation side, which could provide references for the design and fabrication of more efficient Ni-based photocatalytic H2-evolution systems.

Fig. 28. (A) TEM image of CdS-Ni2P, (B) the average H2 evolution rate, (C) time-resolved photoluminescence over different CdS-Ni2P composites, and (D) an integrated Ni2P/CdS NRs photocatalytic H2 evolution system [329].
Fig. 29. (A) Mechanism of H2 generation over EY-NiMo@MIL-101, (B) photocatalytic H2 evolution activity at different pHs, (C) energy diagram for the two-step oxidation reaction, and (D) comparison of ·OH formation, illustrated by the photoluminescence spectra of 2-hydroxyterephthalic acid [255].

Additionally, Ni-based cocatalysts have been widely integrated with 2D semiconductor nanosheets or 3D micro/nanostructures for increased photocatalytic H2 evolution [100, 208, 216, 250, 440-442]. It should be pointed out that Ni-based cocatalysts should be selectively deposited on electron-enrichment facets or locations of various nanostructured semiconductors, which could efficiently enhance the utilization rate of electrons to fundamentally increase the photocatalytic H2 production. More importantly, the new fabrication methods should be proposed so as to achieve much stronger interfacial interactions between the semiconductors and Ni-based cocatalysts, which can significantly improve both the stability and the activity of Ni-based cocatalysts.

4.2.2 Introducing Schottky junctions

In general, Schottky junctions can be produced by combining metallic materials with higher Fermi levels or lower work functions and n-type semiconductors having lower Fermi levels or higher work functions, which results in upward band bending toward the semiconductor surface [31, 443]. Although too high a Schottky barrier is unfavorable for charge separation, a Schottky barrier of suitable height could serve as an efficient electron trap that prevents unexpected migration of electrons from the cocatalyst back to the semiconductor and thereby boosts the electrocatalytic activity of the cocatalyst with a high partial electron density [31]. On the contrary, metallic materials with lower Fermi levels or higher work functions can be used to combine with a p-type semiconductor to construct Schottky heterojunctions for facilitating hole separation from the p-type semiconductor to the contacted metal [443]. Here, a metal or nanocarbon with a higher work function could be employed to combine with n-type semiconductors to fabricate Schottky barriers for enhanced charge separation and H2-evolution photoactivity. Until now, various metallic nanocarbon materials with higher work functions, such as graphene, C nanotubes, C QDs, C black, and C fibers, have been employed as cocatalysts to form Schottky heterojunctions and further improve the surface electrocatalytic H2-evolution activity of different Ni-based cocatalysts [29, 215, 263, 297, 444-446]. For example, Li and coworkers [222] synthesized g-C3N4/C black Schottky junctions loaded with NiS cocatalyst. The resulting ternary g-C3N4/0.5% CB/1.5% NiS system could yield an average H2-evolution rate of 992 μmol g-1 h-1, which was almost 2.51 times higher than that of g-C3N4/1.5% NiS (395 μmol g-1 h-1, Fig. 30). In fact, after inserting the C black interface layer between g-C3N4 photocatalyst and NiS cocatalyst, the Schottky junction introduced between the photocatalyst and C black could significantly promote the separation and transfer of the photogenerated electrons from the conduction band of g-C3N4 to the NiS cocatalyst, as the active sites, thus achieving enhanced photoactivity. Inspired by this work, the same group successively fabricated ternary Schottky-based heterojunctions (Fig. 31), including mesoporous g-C3N4/C nanotubes/NiS [224], g-C3N4/acetylene black (AB)/Ni(OH)2 [206], CdS nanosheets/metallic C black/NiS2 [11], and g-C3N4/C black/Co1.4Ni0.6P [317], for highly improved photocatalytic H2 evolution. Among these systems, the metallic C-based Schottky heterojunctions play crucial roles in improving the charge separation from the semiconductor to the Ni-based cocatalyst and subsequently enhancing the electrocatalytic H2-evolution activity and stability of Ni-based cocatalysts, thus resulting in fundamentally improved photocatalytic H2 generation. To deeply reveal the multifunctional roles of the different nanocarbon interface layers, Li et al. introduced different nanocarbons into the interfaces between g-C3N4 and NiS for boosting the photocatalytic H2-generation activity, such as graphite (G), C nanotubes (CNTs), reduced graphene oxide (rGO), C black, and AB. It was found that the introduction of the metallic amorphous AB and C black with higher electrical conductivity and weaker electrocatalytic H2-evolution activity could enhance the H2-generation activity by 3.17 and 2.57 times, respectively (Fig. 32(A)), in comparison with that of g-C3N4-1.0% NiS, which is in turn much higher than that of g-C3N4-0.5% rGO-1.0% NiS. Furthermore, the Nyquist plots (Fig. 32(B)), polarization curves (Fig. 32(C)), and Mott-Schottky plots (Fig. 32(D)) further confirmed the trifunctional roles of nanocarbons as conductive electron bridges, namely, promoting charge separation, boosting the H2-evolution kinetics, and improving TEOA oxidation ability (Fig. 32(E)), thus greatly increasing the photoactivity. These results fully revealed that inserting a C layer between the semiconductors and Ni-based cocatalysts should be an appealing strategy for constructing highly efficient earth-abundant Ni-based photocatalytic H2-evolution systems. However, to date, the combination of conductive graphdiyne C additive and Ni-based H2-evolution cocatalysts has not been reported, but which is highly expected in the field of photocatalytic H2 generation [447]. More interestingly, doped or hybrid nanocarbon materials with much superior conductivity and electrocatalytic activity are encouraged to be in situ or intimately integrated with Ni-based cocatalysts to develop highly durable and effective Schottky-based H2-evolution photocatalysts [448-451].

Fig. 30. (A) Average rate of H2 evolution and (B) the proposed charge transfer mechanisms in g-C3N4/CB/NiS composite under visible light irradiation: A: g-C3N4, B: g-C3N4-0.5% CB, C: g-C3N4-1.5% NiS, D: g-C3N4-0.5% CB-1.5% NiS, E: g-C3N4-1.0% CB-1.5% NiS, F: g-C3N4-1.5% CB-1.5% NiS, and G: g-C3N4-1.5% NiS-0.5% CB [222].
Fig. 31. Proposed mechanisms for photocatalytic H2 generation and charge separation over (A) mesoporous g-C3N4/C nanotubes/NiS [224], (B) g-C3N4/acetylene black/Ni(OH)2 [206], (C) CdS nanosheets/metallic C black/NiS2 [11], and (D) g-C3N4/C black/Co1.4Ni0.6P [317].
Fig. 32. (A) Average H2-evolution rate, (B) Nyquist plots, (C) polarization curves, and (D) Mott-Schottky plots of different photocatalysts. (E) Photocatalytic H2-evolution mechanism of binary and ternary composites. Samples: (a) g-C3N4-1.0% NiS, (b) g-C3N4-0.5% G-1.0% NiS, (c) g-C3N4-0.5% CNT-1.0% NiS, (d) g-C3N4-0.5% rGO-1.0% NiS, (e) g-C3N4-0.5% AB-1.0% NiS, and (f) g-C3N4-0.5% CB-1.0% NiS [68].

Besides nanocarbons, metallic metals could also be employed to form Schottky heterojunctions to boost the surface electrocatalytic H2 evolution over Ni-based cocatalysts. Fundamentally speaking, metallic elements as conductive electron bridges can also play multifunctional roles in increasing the overall photoactivity. For example, Li's group inserted multifunctional metallic Ni interface layers in g-C3N4 nanosheets/amorphous NiS heterojunctions to improve the photoactivity based on the mechanism of Schottky heterojunctions [69]. The results demonstrated that optimized g-C3N4/0.5 wt% Ni/1.0 wt% NiS could achieve the highest H2 evolution of 515 μmol g-1 h-1, which was about 2.8 and 4.6 times higher than those of binary g-C3N4-1.0% NiS and g-C3N4-0.5% Ni, respectively (Fig. 33(A) and (B)). Similarly, the multifunctional roles of the metallic Ni interface layers, namely, improving the charge separation, accelerating the H2-evolution kinetics, and enhancing TEOA oxidation ability, were further confirmed from the Nyquist plots (Fig. 33(C)), polarization curves (Fig. 33(D)), and Mott-Schottky plots (Fig. 33(E) and (F0), respectively. Consequently, the excellent synergistic effects of the metallic Ni interface layers and amorphous NiS cocatalyst result in significantly enhanced H2-evolution photoactivity (Fig. 33(G)). Additionally, Wang and his coworkers confirmed the increased photocatalytic H2 evolution activity and stability of Ni/NiO core-shell cocatalysts decorated on g-C3N4 sample, which was attributed to the formation of a Schottky heterojunction between the g-C3N4 and metallic Ni [234]. In this regard, other metallic elements such as the cost-acceptable Fe, Co, Bi, Mo, and W are also expected to form Schottky heterojunctions that can boost the activities of Ni-based H2-evolution cocatalysts. More interestingly, in theory, other novel metallic materials such as 1T-MoS2 [452-454], 1T-WS2, MoO2 [455, 456], MXene [457, 458], and Fe-Ni sulfide ultrathin nanosheets [136] can not only act as excellent photocatalytic H2-evolution cocatalysts but also serve as electron acceptors to form high-quality Schottky heterojunctions that can markedly improve the photocatalytic H2-evolution over various Ni-based cocatalysts with lower electrical conductivities.

Fig. 33. (A) Photocatalytic H2-generation over time, (B) the average H2-generation rate, (C) Nyquist plots, (D) polarization curves, (E) Mott-Schottky plots, (F) bandgap structures, and (G) photocatalytic H2-generation mechanisms of different photocatalysts. The samples in (A) and (B) are (a): bulk g-C3N4, (b, c): binary g-C3N4-1.0% NiS and g-C3N4-0.5% Ni, (d-g) ternary g-C3N4-0.5% Ni-0.5% NiS, g-C3N4-0.5% Ni-1.0% NiS, g-C3N4-0.5% Ni-1.5% NiS, and g-C3N4-1.0% Ni-1.0% NiS [69].
4.2.3 Constructing type Ⅱ/p-n hetero(homo)junctions

Construction of type Ⅱ/p-n hetero(homo)junctions has been proven to be one of the appealing strategies for boosting charge separation and transfer through the formation of built-in electrical fields [31, 38, 41, 42, 46, 459, 460]. The deposition of Ni-based cocatalysts over these type Ⅱ/p-n hetero(homo)junctions could further improve the transfer of the separated charge carriers from semiconductors to cocatalysts for enhanced photocatalytic H2 generation activity. For instance, Li and coworkers decorated NiS cocatalysts on CdS nanorods/g-C3N4 type Ⅱ heterojunction for photocatalytic H2 evolution.[223] The resulting ternary g-C3N4-CdS-NiS composite could achieve the highest H2-production activity of 2563 μmol g-1 h-1, which is about 1528 times higher than that of pure g-C3N4 (Fig. 34(A) and (B)). The unexpectedly high activity of the ternary g-C3N4-CdS-NiS hybrid can be attributed to the increased separation of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs as a result of the fabrication of the 1D/2D type Ⅱ heterojunction and the accelerated H2-evolution kinetics upon loading the NiS cocatalyst (Fig. 34(C)). In another study, Liu et al. [461] designed a Cd0.5Zn0.5S (CZS) nanotwinned nanorod homojunction with an unanchored NiSx cocatalyst for activation for H2 generation.. The resulting system containing 0.03 wt% Ni could yield the highest internal H2-production quantum efficiency of close to 100% at 425 nm by using Na2S/Na2SO3 as the hole-scavenging electron donor (Fig. 35(A) and (B)). It is proposed that collision-contact mechanism between the CZS and NiSx clusters in the suspension and type Ⅱ charge separation in the homojunction are responsible for the enhanced transfer of the photogenerated electrons to the clusters for photocatalytic H2 generation (Fig. 35(C) and (D)). This work demonstrated the promise of photocatalyst-cocatalyst collision-contact interactions and CZS twinned homojunction for enhanced photoinduced H2 production activity. Yan and his coworkers [207] employed Ni(OH)2 as a cocatalyst in modified CdS/g-C3N4 core/shell nanorod heterojunction photocatalysts (Fig. 36(A)-(D)). The Ni(OH)2 cocatalyst showed excellent stability during photocatalysis. The photocurrent of CdS/g-C3N4/Ni(OH)2 photocatalyst was much higher than that of CdS/g-C3N4, suggesting that Ni(OH)2 could serve as an efficient cocatalyst to improve the separation of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs (Fig. 36(E)). Thus, the electrons in the CB of CdS could be efficiently transferred to the surface of Ni(OH)2 cocatalyst for participation in the photocatalytic reaction (Fig. 36(F)). Therefore, the ternary photocatalyst showed excellent photocatalytic performance (Fig. 36(G)).

Fig. 34. (A) Time courses and (B) the average rate of photocatalytic H2 evolution over the following photocatalysts: (a) g-C3N4; (b) g-C3N4-CdS; (c) g-C3N4-9% NiS; (d) CdS-9% NiS; (e) g-C3N4-CdS-3% NiS; (f) g-C3N4-CdS-6% NiS; (g) g-C3N4-CdS-9% NiS; (h) g-C3N4-CdS-12% NiS; and (i) g-C3N4-CdS-15% NiS. (C) Photocatalytic H2-evolution mechanism of ternary g-C3N4-CdS-NiS hybrid [223].
Fig. 35. (A) Ni-content-dependent H2 evolution rate of CZS twinned photocatalysts. (B) Wavelength-dependent apparent quantum efficiency of Twin-Ni-I with 0.03 wt% Ni. (C) Schematic mechanism of the transfer of photogenerated electrons from CZS nanorods to NiSx based on collisions. (D) Band alignment and the photocatalytic H2 evolution mechanism around a twin boundary in CZS [461].
Fig. 36. (A-D) TEM image of CdS/g-C3N4/Ni(OH)2, (E) photocurrent responses of the prepared samples, (F) band structure of CdS/g-C3N4/Ni(OH)2 sample, and (G) the average H2-evolution rates of different CdS/g-C3N4/Ni(OH)2 samples [207].

Besides type Ⅱ hetero(homo)junctions, p-n heterojunctions have been widely constructed to promote charge separation through interfacial electrical fields [40, 462-465]. As shown in Fig. 37, the contact between p-type and n-type semiconductors with suitable Femi levels could result in p-n junctions under illumination, which could further induce the transfer of the photogenerated electrons and holes to the n-type and p-type semiconductors, respectively, according to the level of band bending and in-built electrical fields [52]. Thus, the formation of p-n junctions could lead to highly enhanced photocatalytic efficiency. For example, Zhang et al. designed the p-n heterojunction of NiS-modified CdS nanorods (Fig. 38(A)) [229]. The resulting NiS-CdS p-n heterojunction exhibited enhanced photocatalytic H2-evolution activity (Fig. 38(B)). It is believed that the photogenerated electrons in p-type NiS could be injected into the n-type CdS nanorods under light irradiation owing to the formation of in-built electrical fields, induced by the p-n heterojunctions (Fig. 38(C) and (D)), thus resulting in highly increased photocatalytic H2-evolution activity. However, here, the NiS cocatalyst plays the photosensitive role in boosting the photoactivity, instead of acting as active H2-evolution sites. Zhang and his coworkers incorporated Ni nanoparticles in modified Co3O4/CdS p-n heterojunction photocatalysts [40]. The photocatalyst showed an excellent H2-production rate of 5.12 mmol-1 g-1, which was 14.2 times higher than that of pure CdS (Fig. 39(A)). The steady-state PL spectra and the time-resolved PL spectra of Co3O4/CdS/Ni were much superior than those of Co3O4/CdS (Fig. 39(B) and (C)). It is believed that Ni nanoparticles could serve as active sites to enhance the separation of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs, thus resulting in a highly improved photocatalytic H2-evolution activity (Fig. 39(D)). In future, it is expected that more and more type Ⅱ/p-n hetero(homo)junctions could be developed and combined with Ni-based cocatalysts for increasing the photocatalytic H2-generation activity. Notably, Ni-based cocatalysts as active sites should be selectively and precisely loaded onto semiconductors containing the collected photogenerated electrons.

Fig. 37. (A) Schematic illustrating the formation of p-n junctions: (a) before contact, (b) in contact, (c) transfer of the photogenerated charge carriers, and (d) the impossible direct Z-scheme mechanism [52].
Fig. 38. (A) HRTEM images of NiS sample. (B) Photocatalytic H2 production over different samples under visible light. (C) Schematic illustration of the charge transfer and separation; and (D) schematic of the electron-hole separation based on the in-built electrical fields induced by the p-n junction. The samples with nominal atomic ratios of Ni to Cd of 0, 0.5, 1, 3, 5, and 10 mol% were labeled Ni0, Ni0.5, Ni1, Ni3, Ni5, and Ni10, respectively [229].
Fig. 39. (A) Amount of H2 evolved, (B) the steady-state PL spectra, and (C) the time-resolved PL spectra of different samples. (D) Photocatalytic mechanism of Co3O4/CdS/Ni system [40].
4.2.4 Forming direct Z-scheme heterojunctions

Direct Z-scheme junctions have also attracted increasing interest in heterogeneous semiconductor photocatalysis [39, 41, 51-53, 460, 466-468]. The concept of a third-generation Z-scheme photocatalytic system, namely the direct Z-scheme photocatalyst, was originally and specifically defined by Yu's group in 2013 [53, 469]. The formation mechanism of direct Z-scheme heterojunctions with staggered band structures (W1 < W2) is shown in Fig. 40. Clearly, suitable band structures and band bending result in favorable direct Z-scheme heterojunctions (Fig. 40(A)-(C)), rather than type Ⅱ heterojunctions (Fig. 40(D)) and impossible charge separation (Fig. 40(E)) [52]. In comparison with type Ⅱ/p-n heterojunctions, the direct Z-scheme heterojunctions not only possess electrons and holes with higher reduction and oxidation capacities for photocatalytic reactions, but also significantly reduce the construction cost, with the light-shielding effect removed [52, 53]. Until now, various direct Z-scheme heterojunctions, including g-C3N4/TiO2 [469-473], g-C3N4/WO3 [9, 474, 475], g-C3N4/Ag2WO4 [476], Zn-doped g-C3N4/BiVO4 [477], Bi2O3/g-C3N4 [474, 478-481], g-C3N4/ZnO [482-485], AgCl@g-C3N4 [486], TiO2/CdS [487-489], WO3/Ag3PO4 [490], TiO2/WO3 [491], WO3/CdS [492, 493], g-C3N4/MnO2, [494], g-C3N4/MoS2, [495], BiVO4/g-C3N4, [496], g-C3N4/SnS2 [497], and g-C3N4/BiOI [498, 499], have been extensively designed, fabricated, and applied in the different fields of photocatalysis. Interestingly, combining these direct Z-scheme systems with Ni-based cocatalysts should be a promising strategy to achieve significantly increased photocatalytic H2 generation. For example, He et al. first fabricated novel WO3/g-C3N4 hybrids through high-temperature calcination and subsequently loaded earth-abundant Ni(OH)x cocatalyst by the method of in situ photodeposition.[9] The resulting ternary WO3 (20 wt%)/g-C3N4/Ni(OH)x (4.8 wt%) hybrid exhibited the highest photocatalytic H2 generation rate of 576 μmol g-1 h-1) (Fig. 41(A)). The polarization curves clearly confirmed the cocatalytic function of Ni(OH)x (Fig. 41B). More interestingly, the WO3 (20 wt%)/g-C3N4/Ni(OH)x (4.8 wt%) hybrid revealed much stronger ESR signals of ·O2- and ·OH radicals than WO3 (20 wt%)/g-C3N4 and g-C3N4/Ni(OH)x (4.8 wt%) (Fig. 41(C)), clearly confirming the direct Z-scheme charge separation mechanism during photocatalytic H2 generation. Thus, the remarkably improved H2 evolution performance was attributed to the combined effects of increased separation of the photoexcited electron-hole pairs and enhanced TEOA oxidation kinetics through the construction of the Z-scheme heterojunction (WO3/g-C3N4), and improved H2 evolution as a result of the loading of the cocatalyst (Ni(OH)x) (Fig. 41D). More recently, a new concept of a step-scheme (S-scheme) heterojunction between WO3 and g-C3N4 has been proposed and applied in photocatalytic H2 generation in the presence of Pt cocatalyst [54]. However, so far, there have been limited reports on the integration of Ni-based cocatalysts and direct Z-scheme/S-scheme heterojunctions for photocatalytic H2 production. Therefore, the development of Ni-based-cocatalyst-modified direct Z-scheme/S-scheme heterojunctions is highly expected in future studies.

Fig. 40. Formation mechanism of direct Z-scheme heterojunctions with staggered band structures (W1 < W2): (a) before contact, (b) in contact, (c) formation of direct Z-scheme heterojunctions, (d) impossible charge transfers in type-Ⅱ heterojunctions, and (e) impossible photogenerated charge carrier recombination sequences. W1, W2, Vac, Ec, Ev, and EF denote the work functions of PC Ⅰ and PC Ⅱ, vacuum level, CB minimum, VB maximum, and Fermi level, respectively [52].
Fig. 41. (A) Average photocatalytic H2-evolution rate, (B) polarization curves, (C) ESR ·O2- and ·OH spectra of different samples, and (D) photocatalytic H2-generation mechanisms of ternary WO3/g-C3N4/Ni(OH)x photocatalyst. [9].
4.3 Strategies based on strengthening interfacial interaction

Strengthening semiconductor/cocatalyst interfacial interaction is another appealing research direction to boost the electron transfer from the semiconductor to the cocatalyst and subsequently accelerate the surface electrocatalytic H2 evolution over the cocatalysts. Generally, stronger interfacial interactions between semiconductors and cocatalysts could lead to a favorable interfacial effect on the electron-transfer process during photocatalysis, and are dependent on several important parameters that include the size, morphology, crystallinity, and composition of both the cocatalysts and the semiconductors, and their interfacial bonding and contact area [383, 500-502]. A simple method is to fabricate tight heterojunction interfaces through in situ high-temperature reactions. For instance, He et al. fabricated an intimate g-C3N4 nanosheet/NiS cocatalyst heterojunction through one-step in situ annealing of urea, thiourea, and Ni acetate (Fig. 42A) [228]. Here, thiourea could serve as both the S source for NiS and the precursor for g-C3N4. The resulting optimal g-C3N4 nanosheet/NiS cocatalyst heterojunction with intimate interfaces could achieve the maximum H2-production rate of 29.68 μmol h-1, which is comparable with that of a 0.5 wt% Pt-loaded sample (Fig. 42(B)). The remarkably enhanced H2 evolution could be attributed to the acceleration of the sluggish H2-evolution kinetics (Fig. 42C), promoted charge separation (Fig. 42(D)), and increased oxidizing ability of TEOA [228]. Therefore, this study highlights the role of high-quality semiconductor/cocatalyst interfaces in improving the H2-generation photoactivities of binary hybrid photocatalytic systems.

Fig. 42. (A) Schematic illustration of the formation of NiS/g-C3N4 heterojunction; (B) the average photocatalytic H2-evolution rates; and (C) polarization curves of different samples. (D) Photocatalytic H2-evolution mechanism in the NiS/g-C3N4 composite photocatalyst. The samples a-f in Fig. B are (a) CN2 (urea/thiourea/Ni acetate = 30 g: 1.5 g: 0.2 g), (b) CN4 (urea/thiourea/Ni acetate = 30 g: 1.5 g: 0.4 g), (c) CN6 (urea/thiourea/Ni acetate = 30 g: 1.5 g: 0.6 g), (d) CN8 (urea/thiourea/Ni acetate = 30 g: 1.5 g: 0.8 g), (e) CN6-M (urea/thiourea/Ni acetate = 6 g: 6 g: 0.6 g), and (f) 0.5 wt% Pt/CN-U (urea/thiourea/Ni acetate = 30 g: 1.5 g) [228].

Besides increasing the tightness of interfaces, construction of chemically bonded semiconductor/cocatalyst interfaces is also an effective method to strengthen interfacial interactions. Compared to the conventional interfacial interactions involving electrostatic or Van der Waals forces, the stronger chemical bonding interactions between the cocatalyst and the host semiconductor could provide firmer interfaces, thus essentially favoring synergistic enhancements in the charge separation and the photocatalytic activity and stability. For example, Wu et al. fabricated a chemically bonded Ni cocatalyst over S-doped g-C3N4 nanosheets (Ni-S:g-C3N4/Ni-SCN) based on S bonds for enhanced H2 production under sunlight irradiation [264]. The resulting Ni-SCN could achieve excellent photostability and photocatalytic H2 production rate of 3628 μmol g-1 h-1, with the apparent quantum efficiency being 17.2% at 420 nm (Fig. 43(A) and (B)). It is believed that the chemical bonding of Ni through the S could largely facilitate the charge separation during the photocatalytic process and promote surface electrocatalytic reactions over the Ni cocatalyst, thus resulting in the highly enhanced efficiency (Fig. 43(C) and (D)). This work highlights that the fabrication of a chemical bonding interface between a cocatalyst and the host photocatalyst is a relatively appealing strategy to strengthen the interfacial interactions for boosting the photoactivity and photostability, and is expected to be widely used to fabricate advanced photocatalysts based on Ni-based H2-generation cocatalysts.

Fig. 43. (A) Photocatalytic H2-evolution activity, (B) stability, and illustrations of (C) the band structure and (D) the photocatalytic H2-evolution mechanism of Ni-SCN photocatalyst [264].

Additionally, increasing the effective interface contact area and in situ ion-exchange fabrication of interfaces [220] are also effective strategies for strengthening the interfacial interactions. Previously, it has been proved that 2D-2D interfaces with larger interface contact areas, in comparison with the 0D-1D, 0D-2D, and 1D-2D interfaces, could provide more charge transfer channels for boosting the photocatalytic activity [494, 503-505]. In future, it is expected that 2D-2D coupling and in situ ion-exchange interfaces could be extensively used in photocatalytic H2 evolution by employing Ni-based H2-evolution cocatalysts.

4.4 Strategies based on improving the electrocatalytic activity
4.4.1 Increasing the number of active sites

Increasing the number of active sites is another strategy to boost the surface electrocatalytic activity over semiconductors, driven by the photogenerated charge carriers. Generally, the catalytically active sites in cocatalysts are located at their surface coordination unsaturated sites, basal edge and structural defect sites, highly reactive facets, and surface dangling bonds [506-513]. Therefore, in comparison with a simple increase in the surface area, an improvement in the density of the intrinsic active sites of cocatalysts is much more crucial and appealing for enhancing their overall catalytic activity [33, 514-518]. In this regard, suitable modification strategies, such as advanced heteroatom doping and creating defect sites and alloys, are available for effectively increasing the intrinsic number of surface H2-evolution active sites over Ni-based electrocatalysts. For example, DFT shows that a Ni-Mo alloy exhibits a lower H2 adsorption free energy than Ni or Mo itself. Zhen and his coworkers fabricated NiMo@MIL-101 cocatalyst for photocatalytic H2 evolution (Fig. 44(A)) [276]. As shown in Fig. 44(B), the NiMo@MIL-101 cocatalyst displays an excellent HER performance in dye-sensitization systems. The overpotential of ITO/EY-NiMo@MIL-101 electrode was -0.34 V, which was lower than that of ITO/EY-MIL-101. The lower overpotential suggests faster photogenerated electron transfer from the sur face of MoNi4 to the H2O (Fig. 44(C)). Consequently, the photocatalytic performance over ITO/EY-NiMo@MIL-101 was much higher than that over ITO/EY-MIL-101. The results were consistent with those of the photocurrent test (Fig. 44(D)) [276]. Additionally, improving the dispersion [206, 241, 256, 268, 269, 299] and exposing the surface atoms of the highly reactive facets [268] and porous structures [259, 265, 300, 301, 304, 309] of Ni-based cocatalysts have been used to increase the number of surface H2-evolution active sites, and are expected to be extensively applied in the design for more efficient photocatalysis. Exposing the surface atoms of the highly reactive facets can increase the number of active sites. Zhen et al. used the highly exposed (111) facets of the Ni nanoparticles inserted in the frameworks of MOF-5 as a cocatalyst (Fig. 45(A)) [268]. The photocatalytic H2 evolution rate of Ni@MOF-5 with the highly exposed (111) facets of Ni nanoparticles could reach 30.22 mmol h-1 g-1 (Fig. 45(B)). EIS test showed that the highly exposed (111) facets of the Ni nanoparticles significantly outperformed the highly exposed (200) facets in terms of electron transfer from MOF-5 (Fig. 45(C)). Furthermore, Ni@MOF-5 showed a lower overpotential of -0.37 V, which was attributed to the high dispersion (41.8%) and small sizes of the Ni particles. Thus, the photoexcited electrons would transfer to the H2 production active sites (Ni), resulting in an efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution performance (Fig. 45(D)). Yang and his coworkers designed a highly dispersed NiPx cocatalyst coupled with g-C3N4 nanosheets via the precipitation and solid/gas-phase phosphorization method (Fig. 46(A)) [241]. The results showed that the NiPx nanoparticles with a high dispersion were well loaded onto the surface of the g-C3N4 nanosheets. The maximum H2 evolution rate of the g-C3N4 was about 4068.84 μmol g-1h-1 (Fig. 46(B)). The enhanced photocurrent further confirmed that the highly dispersed NiPx cocatalyst could serve as effective active sites to decrease the recombination of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs, leading to a great improvement in the H2 evolution (Fig. 46(C)). Furthermore, the highly dispersed NiPx -cocatalyst-modified g-C3N4 nanosheets showed an excellent stable performance (Fig. 46(D)), indicating that the highly dispersed NiPx could effectively serve as a cocatalyst to improve the photocatalytic performance. Furthermore, Chen et al. demonstrated that highly dispersed Ni cocatalysts could significantly enhance the photocatalytic H2-evolution performances of TiO2 photocatalysts. At lower loadings, the Ni nanoparticles were almost 1 nm in size, which suggests a very strong metal-support interaction between Ni0 and TiO2 (Fig. 47(A) and (B)). On the other hand, at a Ni loading of 4 wt%, the size of the Ni nanoparticles was about 1-2 nm. The Ni nanoparticles could be easily observed at the Ni loading of 4 wt% (Fig. 47(C)), whereas, at a lower loading, it was difficult to detect the nanoparticles in the TEM images. The result of the photocatalytic H2-evolution performance showed that a lower Ni loading resulted in a better photocatalytic performance (Fig. 47(D)), indicating that a highly dispersed cocatalyst is favorable for improving the photocatalytic H2-evolution performance of TiO2. In theory, any strategy that increases the number of active sites could be effectively used to improve the intrinsic electrocatalytic activities of Ni-based cocatalysts, and are highly expected to be applied in photocatalytic H2 generation over Ni-based cocatalysts.

Fig. 44. (A) Mechanism of the H2 generation reaction over EY-NiMo@MIL-101. (B) Photocatalytic H2 evolution activity, (C) LSV curves, and (D) transient photocurrent responses over prepared photocatalysts [276].
Fig. 45. (A) SAED pattern of Ni (111) nanoparticles, (B) time courses of H2 evolution over prepared photocatalysts, (C) [268].
Fig. 46. (A) Mechanism of the H2 generation reaction over g-C3N4-NiPx, (B) time courses of H2 evolution over NiPX-g-C3N4 composites, (C) transient photocurrent responses of NiPX-g-C3N4 composites, and (D) results of the cycling test of the photocatalytic H2 evolution of NiPX-g-C3N4 [241].
Fig. 47. (A)-(C) TEM images of (A) 0.5 wt.% Ni/TiO2; (B) 1 wt.% Ni/TiO2; and (C) 4 wt.% Ni/TiO2; and (D) time courses of H2 evolution over Ni/TiO2 composites [256].
4.4.2 Enhancing the intrinsic activity

Besides increasing the number of active sites, enhancing the intrinsic activity of each active site is also an effective strategy to improve the surface electrocatalytic activity. Generally, all of the abovementioned (in section 2) five modification strategies for Ni-based electrocatalysts, namely, composition engineering, nanostructure engineering, interfacial engineering, surface engineering, and hybrid engineering, can be employed to boost the surface electrocatalytic H2 evolution over Ni-based cocatalysts. Herein, some typical examples will be highlighted to provide ideas for the rational design and fabrication of Ni-based cocatalysts with enhanced intrinsic activity of each active site. For example, Fan and his coworkers developed Nix Co1-xS2-g-C3N4 for photocatalytic H2 evolution (Fig. 48(A) and (B)) [330]. The optimal amount of photocatalytic H2 produced over Nix Co1-xS2-g-C3N4 could reach 400.81 μmol under continuous visible light irradiation for 4 h, which was 2.5 times higher than that of NiS-g-C3N4 photocatalyst (Fig. 48(C)), suggesting that with different amounts of addition of Co, the Ni-Co boundary active surface activity could be enhanced to varying degrees. The synergistic effect between Ni and Co could effectively decrease the recombination of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs, thus achieving efficient photocatalytic water splitting leading to H2 evolution. These results could also be confirmed from the fluorescence results (Fig. 48(D)). Additionally, Ma et al. used Ni-doped MoS2 to enhance the photocatalytic performance of CdS nanorods (Fig. 49(A)-(D)) [519]. The resulting highest photocatalytic H2-evolution rate of CdS/NiMoS was 24 mmol h-1 g-1, which was 2.4 times higher than that of CdS/MoS2 (Fig. 49(E)). According to DFT calculation, the S-Mo Mulliken population in the NiMoS system was 0.35, which was slightly smaller than that of the MoS system. They demonstrated that Ni doping can increase the number of uncoordinated atoms at the edge sites of MoS2 nanosheets, thus resulting in enhanced electron transfer across the CdS/MoS2 interface, as well as increased H2 reduction (Fig. 49(F)-(K)). Furthermore, Tian and his coworkers prepared Cu and Ni comodified TiO2 photocatalysts via hydrothermal method (Fig. 50(A)-(C)) [271]. The photocatalytic H2-evolution rate of Cu-Ni/TiO2 was 13.5 mmol h-1 g-1, which was 2 and 2.5 times higher than those of Ni/TiO2 and Cu/TiO2, respectively (Fig. 50(D)). The photocatalytic performances of the photocatalysts were strongly affected by the molar ratio of Ni to Cu, which suggested that Ni could improve the intrinsic activities of the cocatalysts. The results of the Nyquist plots and linear scan voltammograms further confirm this point of view (Fig. 50(E) and (F)). Enhancing the intrinsic activity was also applied to transition metal phosphide cocatalysts for improved photocatalytic H2 evolution. Man et al. found that Co-doped Ni2P cocatalyst showed excellent photocatalytic performance with a dye photosensitizer (Fig. 51(A) and (B)) [520]. According to the calculation, the free energy value of CoNiP was close to 0 eV, and was more negative than that of Ni2P. This result represents the strong H-adsorption ability of CoNiP, which suggests optimal HER performance (Fig. 51(C)). Therefore, the overpotential of CoNiP is much lower than that of Ni2P, suggesting an improvement in the photocatalytic HER performance (Fig. 51(D)). Lu et al. improved the photocatalytic performance of g-C3N4 nanosheets through a synergistic effect between Ni3B and Ni(OH)2 cocatalysts. It was found that the photocatalytic H2-evolution rate of the ternary photocatalyst could reach 352.4 μmol g-1h-1, which was 4.6 and 2 times higher than those of g-C3N4/Ni3B and g-C3N4/Ni(OH)2 binary photocatalysts, respectively (Fig. 52(A)). The much smaller EIS diameter of the ternary photocatalyst further confirms the better interfacial electron transfer rate (Fig. 52(A)). More importantly, the ternary photocatalyst showed an excellent HER overpotential, compared with that of the binary photocatalyst, which suggested that the synergistic effect between the Ni3B and Ni(OH)2 cocatalysts could enhance the intrinsic activity of the binary photocatalyst (Fig. 52(C)). Compared with the binary photocatalyst, the synergistic effect between the Ni3B and Ni(OH)2 cocatalysts could significantly improve the light absorption, decrease the recombination of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs, and accelerate the transfer of the photoexcited charges (Fig. 52(D)), thus achieving enhanced photoactivity. Xu et al. enhanced the intrinsic activity by hybridizing C, N-codoped Ni2P and Fe2P cocatalysts (Fig. 53(A)) [327]. The H2-evolution rate of EY-g-C3N4-NiFeP photocatalyst could reach 13.81 mmol h-1 g-1, which was 10 and 5 times higher than those of EY-g-C3N4 and EY-g-C3N4-FeP, respectively (Fig. 53(B)). Compared with pure Fe2P, the hybrid materials of Ni2P and Fe2P cocatalysts could significantly enhance the charge carrier lifetimes of g-C3N4, which suggested the generation of more photoexcited electrons during the photocatalytic reaction leading to H2 production (Fig. 53(C)). The photocurrent result further confirmed the improved transfer of the charge carriers for the Ni2P and Fe2P hybrid cocatalysts, compared with that of pure Fe2P (Fig. 53(D)). In future, besides composition engineering, it is expected that other modification strategies such as nanostructure engineering, interfacial engineering, surface engineering, and nanostructure engineering could be used to enhance the intrinsic activities of cocatalysts.

Fig. 48. (A) X-ray diffraction patterns of pure g-C3N4, g-C3N4/NiS2, g-C3N4/CoSx, and g-C3N4/Nix Co1-xS, (B) mechanism of the H2 generation reaction over g-C3N4/Nix Co1-xS2, (C) H2 evolution over EY-Nix Co1-xS-g-C3N4 photocatalyst, and (D) fluorescence spectra of the g-C3N4/Nix Co1-xS2 system [330].
Fig. 49. (A)-(D) SEM images of CdS/NiMoS. (E) Photocatalytic H2 production over CdS modified with different amounts of NiMoS cocatalyst. The supercells of (F) MoS2, (G) CoMoS, and (H) NiMoS. The density of states of (I) MoS2, (J) CoMoS, and (K) NiMoS [519].
Fig. 50. (A) TEM image of P25, (B) TEM image and (C) HRTEM image of TiO2-Cu/Ni. (D) Effect of the molar ratio of Cu to Ni on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2-Cu/Ni, (E) Nyquist plots, and (F) linear scan voltammograms for (a) an electrode coated with TiO2-1% Ni, (b) an electrode coated with TiO2-1% Cu, and (c) an electrode coated with TiO2-1% Cu/Ni (1:1) [271].
Fig. 51. (A) XRD patterns of various NiMP nanoparticles, (B) free energies for H absorption, (C) photocatalytic HER performance of EY sensitizer system, and (D) linear sweep voltammograms of pristine NiP and NiMP surface systems [520].
Fig. 52. (A) Average H2-evolution rate, (B) Nyquist plots, and (C) polarization curves obtained over different photocatalysts. (D) Schematic of the mechanism of visible-light H2 evolution over CN-Ni3B-Ni(OH)2 ternary photocatalyst. The samples in Fig. A are (a): CN, (b): CN-2Ni(OH)2, (c): CN-3Ni3B, (d): CN-3Ni3B-1Ni(OH)2, (e): CN-3Ni3B-2Ni(OH)2, (f): CN-3Ni3B-3Ni(OH)2, and (g): CN-1% Pt [521].
Fig. 53. (A) TEM image of g-C3N4-NiFeP, (B) average H2 evolution rates over different samples, (C) TRPL spectra, and (D) photocurrent responses of EY-sensitized g-C3N4, CN/FeP/g-C3N4, and CN/FeNiP/g-C3N4 composites [327].
4.4.3 Achieving high dispersion/confinement

Commonly, the random deposition of cocatalysts on supports could result in the formation of large particles with irregular morphologies, due to unexpected agglomeration, thus leading to poor photoactivity owing to the low utilization rate of the active sites [522]. Recently, based on surface coordination and confinement growth, the rational design and fabrication of a highly atomically dispersed cocatalyst with a special shape or a precisely controlled size has attracted increased attention in photocatalysis [218, 241, 523]. For example, to obtain a far better photocatalytic performance, the interlayered spatial steric inhibition effect of layered materials has been employed to design highly dispersed cocatalysts on a layered photocatalyst by suppressing the growth of the cocatalyst particles [218]. Layered HNb3O8 was fabricated by a proton-exchange reaction (Fig. 54(A)) and further exfoliated to synthesize a-few-layered HNb3O8 nanosheets through intercalation of tetrabutylammonium cations into the layered HNb3O8 (Fig. 54(B)). The confined Ni(OH)2 cocatalyst with ultrasmall size and very strong interactions could be realized in the interlayer region of layered HNb3O8 by a self-assembly approach (Fig. 54(C)). The resulting Ni(OH)2/HNb3O8 sample showed the highest photocatalytic H2-evolution rate of 951.0 μL after 4 h of irradiation, which was about 15.7 times higher than that of the sample prepared by a traditional cocatalyst modification method (Fig. 54(D)). In this work, the efficient strategy for designing a cocatalyst with a large number of active surface sites might guide the design and development of a highly dispersed cocatalyst-modified semiconductor for highly efficient photocatalytic H2-evolution systems. Similarly, EY-sensitized Ni(111)@MOF-5 frameworks could achieve highly active and durable photocatalytic H2 evolution under visible light irradiation owing to their high dispersion (41.8%) and small size of the Ni particles (~9 nm), and the high specific surface area of MOF-5 (2973 m2/g) [268]. More recently, Zeng et al. loaded monodisperse sub-15 nm Ni2P nanoparticles on porous g-C3N4 nanosheets to fabricate 0D-2D heterointerfaces for achieving the highest photocatalytic H2 evolution rate of 474.7 μmol g-1 h-1, with an AQY of 3.2% at 435 nm; this was possible due to the good electrical conductivity and electrocatalytic H2-evolution activity of Ni2P nanoparticles [523]. More interestingly, Ye and coworkers anchored well-dispersed hexacoordinated Ni(Ⅱ) species on CdS through a facile wet-chemistry approach by using the promising precursor metal-ethylenediaminetetraacetate complex (Fig. 55(A)-(C)) [253]. The resulting hexacoordinated Ni(Ⅱ) on CdS showed a high activity of 4.3 mmol h-1 (with an AQE of 67.5% at 420 nm), which was much higher than that of Pt-CdS (Fig. 55(D) and (E)). Theoretical modeling indicated that the free energy of atomic H adsorption on the remaining carboxylate and Ni2+ is 0.065 eV, which is quite close to that of Pt (Fig. 55(F)). Dehydrogenation of the "carboxylic acid-Ni-H" intermediate was revealed to be the turnover-limiting step in photocatalytic H2 evolution, based on thermodynamic modeling (Fig. 55(F)). [253] This study highlights that the design of Ni-based cocatalysts at the atomic/molecular scale could offer new opportunities for developing highly efficient photocatalytic H2-production systems. In future, it is expected that promising single-atom cocatalysts [57, 524-526], especially those involving Ni-based materials, could be used in photocatalytic H2 evolution.

Fig. 54. Schematic illustrations of the structures of (A) bulk KNb3O8, (B) Ni-0, and (C) Ni-1. Photocatalytic H2 evolution over bulk KNb3O8, Ni-0, NiSSR-Mix, Ni-Mix, Ni-Pr, and Ni-1. NiSSR-Mix (or Ni-Mix) was prepared by uniformly grounding a mixture of KNb3O8 (synthesized via a solid-state reaction) (or Ni0) and Ni(OH)2 in a mortar. Ni-Pr is the reference sample that was fabricated by a similar method, but using Ni-0 instead of the Nb3O8- 2D nanosheets [218].
Fig. 55. (A) Schematic illustration of the chemical anchoring of a Ni species on CdS. (B) HRTEM (scale bar: 2 nm) and (C) EDS elemental mapping images of the resulting CdS-NiE-350 (The inset of C is a STEM image, scale bar: 1 μm). (D) Wavelength-dependent AQE of photocatalytic H2 evolution over CdS-NiE-350 with 0.7 mol% of Ni-EDTA in CdS. (E) Photocatalytic H2-evolution rates of pure CdS, CdS-NiCl2-350, CdS-NiE-350, and CdS loaded with Pt. (F) The calculated free energy diagram for H2 evolution. (G) Proposed mechanism of H2 formation on the anchored Ni(Ⅱ) species [253].

Besides dispersion, nanoconfinement can not only induce strong interface interactions and greatly improve the electronic and band structures of cocatalysts, but also be beneficial in enhancing the stability of the interior component and increasing the number of exposed active surface sites for photocatalytic reactions. Therefore, the development of nanoconfined Ni-based cocatalyst architectures has been demonstrated to be an appealing and promising strategy to boost the high-efficiency photocatalytic H2-production activity. Owing to the simple fabrication and outstanding performance, nanoconfined Ni@C core-shell nanoparticles have attracted wide interest for specific photocatalytic H2-generation applications. For example, Zhang et al. synthesized Ni@C core-shell nanoparticle-cocatalyst-modified CdS nanorods to boost the photocatalytic H2-evolution activity and stability by a simple one-pot strategy and self-assembly process (Fig. 56(A) and (B)) [281] The resulting nanoconfined Ni@C-modified CdS nanorods could achieve the highest visible-light photocatalytic H2-production rate of 76.1 μmol g-1 h-1, which corresponded to an excellent quantum efficiency of 31.2% at 420 nm (Fig. 56(C)). The results revealed that the nanoconfinement effect in Ni@C core-shell cocatalyst pronouncedly resulted in a controlled Ni core size, intimate interfacial contact and enhanced charge transfer, an optimized electronic structure, and suppressed chemical corrosion (Fig. 56(D)-(F)). This work highlights the potential application of a highly active and low-cost Ni@C core-shell structure with significant nanoconfinement effect in boosting photocatalytic H2 evolution. Similarly, C- [277-280] and NiO- [234, 282-284]coated core-shell cocatalysts have also been extensively employed to enhance the photocatalytic H2 evolution over other photocatalyst systems. It is expected that greater attention should be paid to enhanced photocatalysis based on Ni-based cocatalysts with excellent nanoconfinement effects in future studies.

Fig. 56. (A) Schematic illustration of the fabrication of Ni@C/CdS heterostructure. (B) HRTEM image of Ni@C core-shell nanoparticles. (C) Photocatalytic H2-production rates and (D) steady-state PL spectra of different samples. Schematics of the mechanisms of (E) charge separation and (F) photocatalytic H2 production in NCC2 system. The gray, yellow, and light-yellow spheres denote C, S, and Cd atoms, respectively [281].
5 Conclusion and future prospects

This paper provides a comprehensive review on the significant advances in Ni-based cocatalysts for boosting the heterogeneous photocatalytic H2-generation activity. Until now, various Ni-based cocatalysts, including alloys/metals, oxides, hydroxides, sulfides, borides, carbides, nitrides, and complexes, have been developed and applied in photocatalytic H2 evolution. Meanwhile, important design strategies based on increasing the light harvesting, enhancing the charge separation, strengthening the interfacial interaction, and improving the electrocatalytic activity are also thoroughly discussed. Obviously, Ni-based H2-evolution cocatalysts show great potential owing to their unique cost and performance advantages. Therefore, it is not surprising that Ni-based H2-evolution cocatalysts have received significant attention in the field of photocatalytic H2 generation. Until now, although considerable progress has been made in the past decade, it is still urgently required to develop highly efficient Ni-based H2-evolution cocatalysts and reveal the exact active sites and the underlying enhancement mechanism in these photocatalysts at the atomic and molecular levels.

On one hand, novel Ni-based H2-evolution cocatalysts and semiconductor heterojunctions should be constantly developed and investigated. Recently, new Ni-based H2-evolution electrocatalysts have provided great opportunities for designing new cocatalysts for photocatalytic H2 evolution. In theory, all the modification strategies for developing highly efficient Ni-based electrocatalysts could be extended to the exploitation of Ni-based H2-evolution cocatalysts. However, the difference between electrocatalysts and cocatalysts should be carefully noted in designing Ni-based cocatalysts. In other words, the separation of the photogenerated charge carriers is the biggest challenge, owing to the absence of external electrical fields. Thus, the construction of photocatalysts with effective in-built electrical fields is of great importance to enhance the photocatalytic activity. Clearly, the developments of Schottky junctions, p-n heterojunctions, direct Z-scheme heterojunctions, and their combinations by experimental and theoretical techniques should be significantly encouraged in the near future. Meanwhile, the separated electrons must quickly reach the active surface sites of Ni-based cocatalysts to drive the photocatalytic H2 evolution. In this regard, the semiconductor/cocatalyst interfaces and the electrical conductivities of the cocatalysts must be carefully controlled and optimized to achieve maximum photocatalysis. In future studies, increasingly metallic, multifunctional and ultrathin 2D Ni-based nanosheets, core-shell, and confined nanostructures, single-atom systems, and stronger interfacial interactions should be realized through simple and scaleable fabrication methods, which are highly expected to be applied in high-efficiency and durable photocatalytic H2 generation.

On the other hand, detailed investigations on the exact active sites and reaction pathways should be performed. Interestingly, various in situ observation technologies, such as in situ XAS studies, in situ EPR measurements, and operando Raman spectroscopy, are required, which are highly expected to be applied in identifying the exact active sites for H2 evolution over Ni-based cocatalysts. Furthermore, the charge carrier transfer/separation dynamics in various heterojunctions and cocatalysts should be further identified by using the in situ technologies to provide more direct experimental evidences for confirming the exact charge separation and transfer mechanisms. In particular, DFT calculation is an effective and advanced supplementary tool that can provide highly useful indirect information, such as the exact reaction barrier, the adsorption energy of H, and the adsorption/dissociation properties of water molecules, which offer insights into the underlying charge carrier dynamics and reaction pathways. It is worth pointing out that the mechanisms in Ni-based H2-evolution electrocatalysts still need to be investigated in future studies, as they can provide useful information for understanding the electrocatalytic reaction mechanism over the active surface sites of Ni-based cocatalysts.

Nevertheless, Ni-based H2-evolution cocatalysts are interesting and will continue to be one of the hottest and most important research topics in photocatalytic H2 generation. In particular, more attention should be paid to the application of Ni-based cocatalysts in overall water splitting leading to H2 evolution. An increasing number of exciting Ni-based cocatalysts will be continually designed and applied in photocatalytic H2 generation. It is expected that precise design and development of the active sites of Ni-based H2-evolution cocatalysts can be readily achieved based on detailed structure/performance relationships in the near future, which will significantly advance the appeal of the promising field of photocatalytic H2 production.

Acknowledgment

Dr. X. Li would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51672089), Specical Funding on Applied Science and Technology in Guangdong (2017B020238005) and the State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Material Synthesis and Processing (Wuhan University of Technology) (2015-KF-7) for their support. Dr. Q. Xiang would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51672099). X. Chen appreciates the financial support from the U.S. National Science Foundation (DMR-1609061), the College of Arts and Sciences, University of Missouri-Kansan City and University of Missouri Research Board.

References
[1]
A. Fujishima, K. Honda, Nature, 1972, 238, 37-38. DOI:10.1038/238037a0
[2]
L. Cheng, Q. J. Xiang, Y. L. Liao, H. W. Zhang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2018, 11, 1362-1391. DOI:10.1039/C7EE03640J
[3]
F. Y. Cheng, H. Yin, Q. J. Xiang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 391, 432-439. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.169
[4]
K. C. Christoforidis, P. Fornasiero, ChemCatChem, 2017, 9, 1523-1544. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201601659
[5]
J. H. Yang, D. G. Wang, H. X. Han, C. Li, Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, 46, 1900-1909. DOI:10.1021/ar300227e
[6]
J. Ran, J. Zhang, J. Yu, M. Jaroniec, S. Z. Qiao, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 7787-7812. DOI:10.1039/C3CS60425J
[7]
L. Zhu, Q. D. Yue, D. C. Jiang, H. L. Chen, R. M. Irfan, P. W. Du, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 1753-1761. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63135-3
[8]
F. Chen, H. Yang, X. F. Wang, H. G. Yu, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 296-304. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62554-8
[9]
K. L. He, J. Xie, X. Y. Luo, J. Q. Wen, S. Ma, X. Li, Y. P. Fang, X. C. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 240-252. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62759-1
[10]
D. C. Jiang, L. Zhu, R. M. Irfan, L. Zhang, P. W. Du, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 2102-2109. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62956-5
[11]
S. Ma, X. M. Xu, J. Xie, X. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 1970-1980. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62965-6
[12]
K. Domen, S. Naito, M. Soma, T. Onishi, K. Tamaru, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1980, 543-544.
[13]
K. Domen, A. Kudo, T. Onishi, J. Catal., 1986, 102, 92-98. DOI:10.1016/0021-9517(86)90143-0
[14]
J. W. Li, Q. N. Zhuang, P. M. Xu, D. W. Zhang, L. C. Wei, D. S. Yuan, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 1403-1410. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63053-0
[15]
Y. Lin, J. Zhang, Y. Pan, Y. Q. Liu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 422, 828-837. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.102
[16]
V. Vij, S. Sultan, A. M. Harzandi, A. Meena, J. N. Tiwari, W. G. Lee, T. Yoon, K. S. Kim, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 7196-7225. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.7b01800
[17]
M. Gong, D. Y. Wang, C. C. Chen, B. J. Hwang, H. J. Dai, Nano Res., 2016, 9, 28-46. DOI:10.1007/s12274-015-0965-x
[18]
Y. M. Du, Z. J. Li, Y. R. Liu, Y. Yang, L. Wang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 457, 1081-1086. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.167
[19]
J. L. Lv, H. Miura, M. Yang, T. X. Liang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 399, 769-774. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.12.042
[20]
S. S. Lu, X. Shang, L. M. Zhang, B. Dong, W. K. Gao, F. N. Dai, B. Liu, Y. M. Chai, C. G. Liu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 445, 445-453. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.177
[21]
M. Q. Wang, C. Ye, S. J. Bao, Z. Y. Chen, H. Liu, M. W. Xu, ChemCatChem, 2017, 9, 4169-4174. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201700935
[22]
L. L. Ji, C. C. Lv, Z. F. Chen, Z. P. Huang, C. Zhang, Adv. Mater., 2018, 30, 1705653. DOI:10.1002/adma.v30.17
[23]
Y. Xu, R. Xu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 351, 779-793. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.171
[24]
M. L. Helm, M. P. Stewart, R. M. Bullock, M. R. DuBois, D. L. DuBois, Science, 2011, 333, 863-866. DOI:10.1126/science.1205864
[25]
Z. J. Han, F. Qiu, R. Eisenberg, P. L. Holland, T. D. Krauss, Science, 2012, 338, 1321-1324. DOI:10.1126/science.1227775
[26]
Q. Li, X. Li, S. Wageh, A. A. Al-Ghamdi, J. Yu, Adv. Energy Mater., 2015, 5, 1500010. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201500010
[27]
X. Li, J. Yu, J. Low, Y. Fang, J. Xiao, X. Chen, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 2485-2534. DOI:10.1039/C4TA04461D
[28]
X. Li, J. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2016, 45, 2603-2636. DOI:10.1039/C5CS00838G
[29]
X. Li, J. Yu, S. Wageh, A. A. Al-Ghamdi, J. Xie, Small, 2016, 12, 6640-6696. DOI:10.1002/smll.v12.48
[30]
J. Wen, J. Xie, X. Chen, X. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 391, 72-123. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.030
[31]
Z. Q. Liu, X. M. Zhang, B. Wang, M. Xia, S. Y. Gao, X. Y. Liu, A. Zavabeti, J. Z. Ou, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, Y. C. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2018, 122, 12589-12597. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01678
[32]
J. Fang, G. F. Song, Q. L. Liu, W. Zhang, J. J. Gu, Y. S. Su, H. L. Su, C. P. Guo, Z. Di, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 427, 807-812.
[33]
Y. P. Zhu, C. X. Guo, Y. Zheng, S. Z. Qiao, Acc. Chem. Res., 2017, 50, 915-923. DOI:10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00635
[34]
J. Wen, X. Li, W. Liu, Y. Fang, J. Xie, Y. Xu, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36, 2049-2070. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(15)60999-8
[35]
X. Li, J. Xie, C. Jiang, J. Yu, P. Zhang, Front. Env. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12, 1-32.
[36]
P. Zhang, T. Wang, X. X. Chang, J. L. Gong, Acc. Chem. Res., 2016, 49, 911-921. DOI:10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00036
[37]
S. Bai, J. Jiang, Q. Zhang, Y. J. Xiong, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 2893-2939. DOI:10.1039/C5CS00064E
[38]
H. Du, Y. N. Liu, C. C. Shen, A. W. Xu, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 1295-1306. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62866-3
[39]
H. J. Cui, B. B. Li, Z. Y. Li, X. Z. Li, S. Xu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 455, 831-840. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.054
[40]
Y. K. Zhang, Z. L. Jin, H. Yuan, G. R. Wang, B. Z. Ma, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 462, 213-225. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.081
[41]
J. Low, J. Yu, M. Jaroniec, S. Wageh, A. A. Al-Ghamdi, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1601694. DOI:10.1002/adma.v29.20
[42]
J. Fu, J. Yu, C. Jiang, B. Cheng, Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8, 1701503. DOI:10.1002/aenm.v8.3
[43]
J. Low, B. Cheng, J. Yu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 392, 658-686. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.093
[44]
J. Yu, J. Low, W. Xiao, P. Zhou, M. Jaroniec, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 8839-8842. DOI:10.1021/ja5044787
[45]
P. Makal, D. Das, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 455, 1106-1115. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.055
[46]
Y. L. Wang, W. Zhang, Z. H. Wang, Y. M. Cao, J. M. Feng, Z. L. Wang, Y. Ma, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 1500-1510. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63096-7
[47]
Y. Qiu, F. Ouyang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 403, 691-698. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.255
[48]
X. L. Wang, S. Shen, Z. C. Feng, C. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2016, 37, 2059-2068. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62574-3
[49]
Y. Ma, X. L. Wang, C. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36, 1519-1527. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(15)60874-9
[50]
L. Hao, H. W. Huang, Y. X. Guo, X. Du, Y. H. Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 420, 303-312. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.076
[51]
P. Zhou, J. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Adv. Mater., 2014, 26, 4920-4935. DOI:10.1002/adma.201400288
[52]
Q. Xu, L. Zhang, J. Yu, S. Wageh, A. A. Al-Ghamdi, M. Jaroniec, Mater. Today, 2018, 21, 1042-1063. DOI:10.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.008
[53]
J. Low, C. Jiang, B. Cheng, S. Wageh, A. A. Al-Ghamdi, J. Yu, Small Methods, 2017, 1, 1700080.
[54]
J. Fu, Q. Xu, J. Low, C. Jiang, J. Yu, Appl. Catal. B., 2019, 243, 556-565. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.11.011
[55]
L. Gomathi Devi, R. Kavitha, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2016, 360, 601-622. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.11.016
[56]
S. W. Cao, H. Li, Y. Li, B. C. Zhu, J. G. Yu, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 6478-6487. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00259
[57]
S. W. Cao, H. Li, T. Tong, H. C. Chen, A. C. Yu, J. G. Yu, H. M. Chen, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 1802169. DOI:10.1002/adfm.v28.32
[58]
R. C. Shen, J. Xie, H. D. Zhang, A. P. Zhang, X. B. Chen, X. Li, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 816-826. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03169
[59]
K. L. He, J. Xie, Z. H. Yang, R. C. Shen, Y. P. Fang, S. Ma, X. B. Chen, X. Li, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2017, 7, 1193-1202. DOI:10.1039/C7CY00029D
[60]
R. Shen, J. Xie, Y. Ding, S. Y. Liu, A. Adamski, X. Chen, X. Li, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018.
[61]
J. W. Fu, C. B. Bie, B. Cheng, C. J. Jiang, J. G. Yu, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 2767-2779. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04461
[62]
S. Cao, J. Yu, J. Photochem. Photobiol. C, 2016, 27, 72-99. DOI:10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2016.04.002
[63]
Q. Xiang, B. Cheng, J. Yu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 11350-11366. DOI:10.1002/anie.201411096
[64]
Q. J. Xiang, J. G. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 782-796. DOI:10.1039/C1CS15172J
[65]
J. Low, J. Yu, W. Ho, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2015, 6, 4244-4251. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01610
[66]
J. Low, B. Cheng, J. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Energy Storage Mater., 2016, 3, 24-35. DOI:10.1016/j.ensm.2015.12.003
[67]
X. Zhou, X. Li, Q. Gao, J. Yuan, J. Wen, Y. Fang, W. Liu, S. Zhang, Y. Liu, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, 5, 2798-2806. DOI:10.1039/C4CY01757A
[68]
J. Q. Wen, J. Xie, Z. H. Yang, R. C. Shen, H. Y. Li, X. Y. Luo, X. B. Chen, X. Li, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2017, 5, 2224-2236. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02490
[69]
J. Q. Wen, J. Xie, H. D. Zhang, A. P. Zhang, Y. J. Liu, X. B. Chen, X. Li, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 14031-14042. DOI:10.1021/acsami.7b02701
[70]
R. Shen, J. Xie, X. Lu, X. Chen, X. Li, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 4026-4036. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04403
[71]
R. Shen, J. Xie, P. Guo, L. Chen, X. Chen, X. Li, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2018, 1, 2232-2241.
[72]
S. Trasatti, J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem., 1972, 39, 163-184. DOI:10.1016/S0022-0728(72)80485-6
[73]
M. G. Walter, E. L. Warren, J. R. McKone, S. W. Boettcher, Q. Mi, E. A. Santori, N. S. Lewis, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 6446-6473. DOI:10.1021/cr1002326
[74]
D. M. Soares, O. Teschke, I. Torriani, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1992, 139, 98-105. DOI:10.1149/1.2069207
[75]
M. Gong, W. Zhou, M. C. Tsai, J. G. Zhou, M. Y. Guan, M. C. Lin, B. Zhang, Y. F. Hu, D. Y. Wang, J. Yang, S. J. Pennycook, B. J. Hwang, H. J. Dai, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5, 4695. DOI:10.1038/ncomms5695
[76]
X. X. Zou, Y. Zhang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5148-5180. DOI:10.1039/C4CS00448E
[77]
E. J. Popczun, J. R. McKone, C. G. Read, A. J. Biacchi, A. M. Wiltrout, N. S. Lewis, R. E. Schaak, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 9267-9270. DOI:10.1021/ja403440e
[78]
Y. M. Shi, B. Zhang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2016, 45, 1529-1541. DOI:10.1039/C5CS00434A
[79]
Y. M. Shi, B. Zhang, Dalton Trans., 2017, 46, 16770-16773. DOI:10.1039/C7DT03648E
[80]
Z. Cao, Q. Chen, J. Zhang, H. Li, Y. Jiang, S. Shen, G. Fu, B. A. Lu, Z. Xie, L. Zheng, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 15131. DOI:10.1038/ncomms15131
[81]
X. Zhang, H. Xu, X. Li, Y. Li, T. Yang, Y. Liang, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 580-588. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.5b02291
[82]
Z. Xing, D. Wang, Q. Li, A. M. Asiri, X. Sun, Electrochim. Acta, 2016, 210, 729-733. DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.003
[83]
C. Zhang, M. F. Shao, L. Zhou, Z. H. Li, K. M. Xiao, M. Wei, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8, 33697-33703. DOI:10.1021/acsami.6b12100
[84]
L. X. Wang, Y. Li, M. R. Xia, Z. P. Li, Z. H. Chen, Z. P. Ma, X. J. Qin, G. J. Shao, J. Power Sources, 2017, 347, 220-228. DOI:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.02.017
[85]
S. A. Abbas, M. I. Iqbal, S. H. Kim, K. D. Jung, Electrochim. Acta, 2017, 227, 382-390. DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2017.01.039
[86]
S. Wang, J. Wang, M. Zhu, X. Bao, B. Xiao, D. Su, H. Li, Y. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 15753-15759. DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b07924
[87]
T. Li, G. Luo, K. Liu, X. Li, D. Sun, L. Xu, Y. Li, Y. Tang, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 1805828. DOI:10.1002/adfm.v28.51
[88]
Z. C. Xing, X. R. Yang, A. M. Asiri, X. P. Sun, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8, 14521-14526. DOI:10.1021/acsami.6b02331
[89]
N. V. Krstajic, V. D. Jovic, L. Gajic-Krstajic, B. M. Jovic, A. L. Antozzi, G. N. Martelli, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33, 3676-3687. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.04.039
[90]
J. Deng, P. Ren, D. Deng, X. Bao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 2100-2104. DOI:10.1002/anie.201409524
[91]
M. Zhiani, S. Kamali, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 8108-8116. DOI:10.1039/C7TA00146K
[92]
Z. Y. Yu, Y. Duan, M. R. Gao, C. C. Lang, Y. R. Zheng, S. H. Yu, Chem. Sci., 2017, 8, 968-973. DOI:10.1039/C6SC03356C
[93]
M. Zeng, H. Wang, C. Zhao, J. K. Wei, K. Qi, W. L. Wang, X. D. Bai, ChemCatChem, 2016, 8, 708-712. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v8.4
[94]
C. Adan, F. J. Perez-Alonso, S. Rojas, M. A. Pena, J. L. G. Fierro, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37, 14984-14991. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.094
[95]
P. Zhang, M. Wang, Y. Yang, T. Yao, H. Han, L. Sun, Nano Energy, 2016, 19, 98-107. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.11.020
[96]
W. F. Chen, K. Sasaki, C. Ma, A. I. Frenkel, N. Marinkovic, J. T. Muckerman, Y. Zhu, R. R. Adzic, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 6131-6135. DOI:10.1002/anie.201200699
[97]
Y. Zhang, B. Ouyang, J. Xu, S. Chen, R. S. Rawat, H. J. Fan, Adv. Energy Mater., 2016, 6, 1600221. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201600221
[98]
X. Jia, Y. Zhao, G. Chen, L. Shang, R. Shi, X. Kang, G. I. N. Waterhouse, L. Z. Wu, C. H. Tung, T. Zhang, Adv. Energy Mater., 2016, 6, 1502585. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201502585
[99]
B. Liu, B. He, J. Y. Cheng, J. H. Shen, W. J. Zhang, H. Q. Peng, Y. F. Zhao, J. Xia, X. M. Meng, T. W. Ng, C. S. Lee, Adv. Sci., 2018, 5, 1800406. DOI:10.1002/advs.v5.8
[100]
L. Wang, Y. Li, X. Yin, Y. Wang, A. Song, X. Qin, G. Shao, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2017, 5, 7993-8003. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01576
[101]
M. Ledendecker, H. Schlott, M. Antonietti, B. Meyer, M. Shalom, Adv. Energy Mater., 2017, 7, 1601735. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201601735
[102]
X. Fan, Z. Peng, R. Ye, H. Zhou, X. Guo, ACS Nano, 2015, 9, 7407-7418. DOI:10.1021/acsnano.5b02420
[103]
T. Song, P. Y. Zhang, J. Zeng, T. T. Wang, A. Ali, H. P. Zeng, ChemCatChem, 2017, 9, 4035-4042. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v9.21
[104]
L. L. Fan, P. F. Liu, X. C. Yan, L. Gu, Z. Z. Yang, H. G. Yang, S. L. Qiu, X. D. Yao, Nat. Commun., 2016, 7, 10667.
[105]
F. Wang, Y. Sun, Y. He, L. Liu, J. Xu, X. Zhao, G. Yin, L. Zhang, S. Li, Q. Mao, Y. Huang, T. Zhang, B. Liu, Nano Energy, 2017, 37, 1-6. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.050
[106]
B. Chang, G. Zhao, Y. L. Shao, L. Zhang, B. B. A. Huang, Y. Z. Wu, X. P. Hao, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 18038-18043. DOI:10.1039/C7TA05642G
[107]
X. Liu, W. Liu, M. Ko, M. Park, M.G. Kim, P. Oh, S. Chae, S. Park, A. Casimir, G. Wu, J. Cho, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2015, 25, 5799-5808. DOI:10.1002/adfm.201502217
[108]
M. K. Bates, Q. Y. Jia, N. Ramaswamy, R. J. Allen, S. Mukerjee, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2015, 119, 5467-5477.
[109]
L. Qian, Z. Lu, T. Xu, X. Wu, Y. Tian, Y. Li, Z. Huo, X. Sun, X. Duan, Adv. Energy Mater., 2015, 5, 1500245. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201500245
[110]
S. Li, Y. Wang, S. Peng, L. Zhang, A. M. Al-Enizi, H. Zhang, X. Sun, G. Zheng, Adv. Energy Mater., 2016, 6, 1501661. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201501661
[111]
C. Y. Hu, Q. Y. Ma, S. F. Hung, Z. N. Chen, D. H. Ou, B. Ren, H. M. Chen, G. Fu, N. F. Zheng, Chem., 2017, 3, 122-133. DOI:10.1016/j.chempr.2017.05.011
[112]
X. X. Wang, R. P. Liu, Y. Zhang, L. X. Zeng, A. H. Liu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 456, 164-173. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.107
[113]
B. Zhang, J. Liu, J. Wang, Y. Ruan, X. Ji, K. Xu, C. Chen, H. Wan, L. Miao, J. Jiang, Nano Energy, 2017, 37, 74-80. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.05.011
[114]
X. Wang, Y. V. Kolen, ' ko, X. Q. Bao, K. Kovnir, L. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 8188-8192. DOI:10.1002/anie.201502577
[115]
P. Jiang, Q. Liu, X. Sun, Nanoscale, 2014, 6, 13440-13445. DOI:10.1039/C4NR04866K
[116]
Z. Jin, P. Li, X. Huang, G. Zeng, Y. Jin, B. Zheng, D. Xiao, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 18593-18599. DOI:10.1039/C4TA04434G
[117]
J. F. Chang, S. T. Li, G. Q. Li, J. J. Ge, C. P. Liu, W. Xing, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 9755-9759. DOI:10.1039/C6TA03481K
[118]
Z. X. Cai, X. H. Song, Y. R. Wang, X. Chen, ChemElectroChem, 2015, 2, 1665-1671. DOI:10.1002/celc.201500239
[119]
W. Q. Tang, J. Y. Wang, L. X. Guo, X. Teng, T. J. Meyer, Z. F. Chen, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 41347-41353. DOI:10.1021/acsami.7b14466
[120]
Y. N. Regmi, A. Roy, L. A. King, D. A. Cullen, H. M. Meyer, G. A. Goenaga, T. A. Zawodzinski, N. Labbe, S. C. Chmely, Chem. Mater., 2017, 29, 9369-9377. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03377
[121]
X. Zhang, W. Gu, E. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 982-987. DOI:10.1039/C6TA08094D
[122]
M. Chen, J. Qi, W. Zhang, R. Cao, Chem. Commun., 2017, 53, 5507-5510. DOI:10.1039/C7CC01584D
[123]
J. Q. Zhuo, M. Caban-Acevedo, H. F. Liang, L. Samad, Q. Ding, Y. P. Fu, M. X. Li, S. Jin, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 6355-6361. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.5b01657
[124]
G. Y. Yu, W. X. Zhang, J. G. Cao, W. F. Yan, G. Liu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 24249-24254. DOI:10.1039/C7CP04463A
[125]
J. Y. Li, M. Yan, X. M. Zhou, Z. Q. Huang, Z. M. Xia, C. R. Chang, Y. Y. Ma, Y. Q. Qu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2016, 26, 6785-6796. DOI:10.1002/adfm.v26.37
[126]
W. Li, D. H. Xiong, X. F. Gao, W. G. Song, F. Xia, L. F. Liu, Catal. Today, 2017, 287, 122-129. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2016.09.007
[127]
R. Zhang, X. Wang, S. Yu, T. Wen, X. Zhu, F. Yang, X. Sun, X. Wang, W. Hu, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1605502. DOI:10.1002/adma.201605502
[128]
G. Q. Han, X. Li, J. Xue, B. Dong, X. Shang, W. H. Hu, Y. R. Liu, J. Q. Chi, K. L. Yan, Y. M. Chai, C. G. Liu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42, 2952-2960. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.207
[129]
C. Xia, H. Liang, J. Zhu, U. Schwingenschlogl, H. N. Alshareef, Adv. Energy Mater., 2017, 7, 1602089. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201602089
[130]
D. Ansovini, C. J. J. Lee, C. S. Chua, L. T. Ong, H. R. Tan, W. R. Webb, R. Raja, Y. F. Lim, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 9744-9749. DOI:10.1039/C6TA00540C
[131]
P. Y. Kuang, T. Tong, K. Fan, J. G. Yu, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 6179-6187. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.7b02225
[132]
H. Zou, B. He, P. Kuang, J. Yu, K. Fan, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 1706917. DOI:10.1002/adfm.v28.13
[133]
Y. M. An, B. L. Huang, Z. L. Wang, X. Long, Y. C. Qiu, J. Hu, D. Zhou, H. Lin, S. H. Yang, Dalton Trans., 2017, 46, 10700-10706. DOI:10.1039/C7DT00878C
[134]
J. F. Chang, K. Li, Z. J. Wu, J. J. Ge, C. P. Liu, W. Xing, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10, 26303-26311. DOI:10.1021/acsami.8b08068
[135]
L. L. Feng, G. Yu, Y. Wu, G. D. Li, H. Li, Y. Sun, T. Asefa, W. Chen, X. Zou, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 14023-14026. DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b08186
[136]
X. Long, G. X. Li, Z. L. Wang, H. Y. Zhu, T. Zhang, S. Xiao, W. Y. Guo, S. H. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 11900-11903. DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b07728
[137]
J. J. Lv, J. Zhao, H. Fang, L. P. Jiang, L. L. Li, J. Ma, J. J. Zhu, Small, 2017, 13, 1700264. DOI:10.1002/smll.201700264
[138]
P. D. Tran, S. Y. Chiam, P. P. Boix, Y. Ren, S. S. Pramana, J. Fize, V. Artero, J. Barber, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 2452-2459. DOI:10.1039/c3ee40600h
[139]
F. Qi, P. J. Li, Y. F. Chen, B. J. Zheng, J. B. Liu, J. H. Zhou, J. R. He, X. Hao, W. L. Zhang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42, 7811-7819. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.089
[140]
L. Ma, Y. Hu, R. Chen, G. Zhu, T. Chen, H. Lv, Y. Wang, J. Liang, H. Liu, C. Yan, H. Zhu, Z. Tie, Z. Jin, J. Liu, Nano Energy, 2016, 24, 139-147. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.024
[141]
Y. Q. Jiang, X. Qian, C. L. Zhu, H. Y. Liu, L. X. Hou, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10, 9379-9389. DOI:10.1021/acsami.7b18439
[142]
D. Q. Zeng, L. Xiao, W. J. Ong, P. Y. Wu, H. F. Zheng, Y. Z. Chen, D. L. Peng, ChemSusChem, 2017, 10, 4624-4631. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201701345
[143]
Z. Peng, D. Jia, A. M. Al-Enizi, A. A. Elzatahry, G. Zheng, Adv. Energy Mater., 2015, 5, 1402031/1-1402031/7.
[144]
J. Yan, H. Wu, P. Li, H. Chen, R. Jiang, S. Liu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 10173-10181. DOI:10.1039/C6TA11041J
[145]
C. Yang, M. Y. Gao, Q. B. Zhang, J. R. Zeng, X. T. Li, A. P. Abbott, Nano Energy, 2017, 36, 85-94. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.032
[146]
B. Liu, Y. F. Zhao, H. Q. Peng, Z. Y. Zhang, C. K. Sit, M. F. Yuen, T. R. Zhang, C. S. Lee, W. J. Zhang, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1606521. DOI:10.1002/adma.v29.19
[147]
H. Zhou, F. Yu, Y. Liu, J. Sun, Z. Zhu, R. He, J. Bao, W. A. Goddard, Ⅲ, S. Chen, Z. Ren, Energy Environ. Sci., 2017, 10, 1487-1492. DOI:10.1039/C7EE00802C
[148]
A. Das, Z. J. Han, W. W. Brennessel, P. L. Holland, R. Eisenberg, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 1397-1406. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.5b00045
[149]
J. Hu, C. X. Zhang, X. Y. Meng, H. Lin, C. Hu, X. Long, S. H. Yang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 5995-6012. DOI:10.1039/C7TA00743D
[150]
T. Y. Wang, H. Xie, M. J. Chen, A. D' Aloia, J. Cho, G. Wu, Q. Li, Nano Energy, 2017, 42, 69-89. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.045
[151]
Y. F. Ma, G. Q. Guan, X. G. Hao, J. Cao, A. Abudula, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 2017, 75, 1101-1129. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.092
[152]
Y. Lv, X. B. Wang, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2017, 7, 3676-3691. DOI:10.1039/C7CY00715A
[153]
J. Zhang, G. B. Chen, X. L. Feng, K. Mullen, Adv. Mater., 2018, 30, e1800528. DOI:10.1002/adma.v30.40
[154]
A. C. Thenuwara, L. Dheer, N. H. Attanayake, Q. M. Yan, U. V. Waghmare, D. R. Strongin, ChemCatChem, 2018, 10, 4846-4851.
[155]
J. Wang, Y. F. Lim, G. W. Ho, ChemCatChem, 2017, 9, 4148-4154. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v9.21
[156]
L. Z. Bian, W. Gao, J. M. Sun, M. M. Han, F. L. Li, Z. F. Gao, L. Shu, N. Han, Z. X. Yang, A. M. Song, Y. Q. Qu, J. C. Ho, ChemCatChem, 2018, 10, 1571-1577. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v10.7
[157]
Y. F. Xia, J. W. Huang, W. Q. Wu, Y. D. Zhang, H. Wang, J. T. Zhu, J. J. Yao, L. Xu, Y. H. Sun, L. Zhang, R. F. Lu, J. Xiong, G. F. Zou, ChemCatChem, 2018, 10, 4424-4430. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v10.19
[158]
Y. X. Chen, K. N. Yang, B. Jiang, J. X. Li, M. Q. Zeng, L. Fu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 8187-8208. DOI:10.1039/C7TA00816C
[159]
J. Di, C. Yan, A. D. Handoko, Z. W. Seh, H. M. Li, Z. Liu, Mater. Today, 2018, 21, 749-770. DOI:10.1016/j.mattod.2018.01.034
[160]
U. Gupta, C. N. R. Rao, Nano Energy, 2017, 41, 49-65. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.08.021
[161]
D. Voiry, H. S. Shin, K. P. Loh, M. Chhowalla, Nat. Rev. Chem., 2018, 2, 0105. DOI:10.1038/s41570-017-0105
[162]
N. Mahmood, Y. D. Yao, J. W. Zhang, L. Pan, X. W. Zhang, J. J. Zou, Adv. Sci., 2018, 5, 1700464. DOI:10.1002/advs.201700464
[163]
A. S. Chen, R. J. Cui, Y. N. He, Q. Wang, J. Zhang, J. P. Yang, X. A. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 411, 210-218. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.184
[164]
X. Shang, K. L. Yan, Z. Z. Liu, S. S. Lu, B. Dong, J. Q. Chi, X. Li, Y. R. Liu, Y. M. Chai, C. G. Liu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 402, 120-128.
[165]
T. L. Wu, M. Y. Pi, X. D. Wang, W. M. Guo, D. K. Zhang, S. J. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 427, 800-806. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.154
[166]
L. Chen, H. L. Zhu, ChemCatChem, 2018, 10, 459-464. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v10.2
[167]
K. K. Xu, X. L. Fu, H. Li, Z. J. Peng, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 456, 230-237. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.106
[168]
G. Q. Zhao, K. Rui, S. X. Dou, W. P. Sun, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 1803291. DOI:10.1002/adfm.v28.43
[169]
Y. J. Chen, C. H. Kang, R. H. Wang, Z. Y. Ren, H. Y. Fu, Y. T. Xiao, G. H. Tian, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 442, 352-360. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.142
[170]
Y. C. Liu, B. B. Huang, Z. L. Xie, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 427, 693-701. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.098
[171]
Y. R. Liu, X. Shang, W. K. Gao, B. Dong, J. Q. Chi, X. Li, K. L. Yan, Y. M. Chai, Y. Q. Liu, C. G. Liu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 412, 138-145. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.245
[172]
B. W. Ahn, T. Y. Kim, S. H. Kim, Y. I. Song, S. J. Suh, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 432, 183-189. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.262
[173]
S. K. Kim, W. Song, S. Ji, Y. R. Lim, Y. B. Lee, S. Myung, J. Lim, K. S. An, S. S. Lee, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 425, 241-245. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.211
[174]
X. Y. Zhang, Z. J. Du, X. N. Luo, A. K. Sun, Z. Z. Wu, D. Z. Wang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 433, 723-729. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.105
[175]
H. X. Liu, X. Y. Peng, X. J. Liu, ChemElectroChem, 2018, 5, 2963-2974. DOI:10.1002/celc.201800507
[176]
J. Wang, F. Xu, H. Y. Jin, Y. Q. Chen, Y. Wang, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1605838. DOI:10.1002/adma.v29.14
[177]
A. P. Murthy, J. Madhavan, K. Murugan, J. Power Sources, 2018, 398, 9-26.
[178]
D. N. Sangeetha, M. Selvakumar, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 453, 132-140. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.033
[179]
L. Q. Wu, X. B. Xu, Y. Q. Zhao, K. Y. Zhang, Y. Sun, T. T. Wang, Y. Q. Wang, W. Zhong, Y. W. Du, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 425, 470-477. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.223
[180]
X. B. Xu, Y. Sun, W. Qiao, X. Zhang, X. Chen, X. Y. Song, L. Q. Wu, W. Zhong, Y. W. Du, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 396, 1520-1527. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.201
[181]
X. B. Xu, W. Zhong, L. Q. Wu, Y. Sun, T. T. Wang, Y. Q. Wang, Y. W. Du, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 428, 1046-1055. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.250
[182]
J. J. Zheng, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 413, 360-365. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.285
[183]
G. B. Darband, M. Aliofkhazraei, A. S. Rouhaghdam, M. A. Kiani, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 465, 846-862. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.204
[184]
H. L. Guo, N. Youliwasi, L. Zhao, Y. M. Chai, C. G. Liu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 435, 237-246. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.083
[185]
F. Z. Song, W. Li, J. Q. Yang, G. Q. Han, P. L. Liao, Y. J. Sun, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 4531. DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-06728-7
[186]
Z. J. Chen, G. X. Cao, L. Y. Gan, H. Dai, N. Xu, M. J. Zang, H. B. Dai, H. Wu, P. Wang, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 8866-8872. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.8b02212
[187]
X. L. Liu, P. Wang, Q. Q. Zhang, B. B. Huang, Z. Y. Wang, Y. Y. Liu, Z. K. Zheng, Y. Dai, X. Y. Qin, X. Y. Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 459, 422-429. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.024
[188]
M. Gong, W. Zhou, M. J. Kenney, R. Kapusta, S. Cowley, Y. P. Wu, B. A. Lu, M. C. Lin, D. Y. Wang, J. Yang, B. J. Hwang, H. J. Dai, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 11989-11993. DOI:10.1002/anie.201504815
[189]
A. P. Murthy, J. Theerthagiri, J. Madhavan, K. Murugan, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 1988-1998. DOI:10.1039/C6CP07416B
[190]
Y. Zhang, J. B. Zang, S. P. Jia, P. F. Tian, C. Han, Y. H. Wang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 412, 327-334. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.284
[191]
W. Lubitz, H. Ogata, O. Rudiger, E. Reijerse, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 4081-4148. DOI:10.1021/cr4005814
[192]
V. S. Thoi, Y. J. Sun, J. R. Long, C. J. Chang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 2388-2400. DOI:10.1039/C2CS35272A
[193]
M. P. Stewart, M. H. Ho, S. Wiese, M. L. Lindstrom, C. E. Thogerson, S. Raugei, R. M. Bullock, M. L. Helm, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 6033-6046. DOI:10.1021/ja400181a
[194]
W. T. Eckenhoff, R. Eisenberg, Dalton Trans., 2012, 41, 13004-13021. DOI:10.1039/c2dt30823a
[195]
S. Berardi, S. Drouet, L. Francas, C. Gimbert-Surinach, M. Guttentag, C. Richmond, T. Stoll, A. Llobet, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 7501-7519. DOI:10.1039/C3CS60405E
[196]
Q. Y. Ma, C. Y. Hu, K. L. Liu, S. F. Hung, D. H. Ou, H. M. Chen, G. Fu, N. F. Zheng, Nano Energy, 2017, 41, 148-153. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.09.036
[197]
A. Indra, P. W. Menezes, K. Kailasam, D. Hollmann, M. Schroder, A. Thomas, A. Bruckner, M. Driess, Chem. Commun., 2016, 52, 104-107. DOI:10.1039/C5CC07936E
[198]
Y. L. Deng, L. R. L. Ting, P. H. L. Neo, Y. J. Zhang, A. A. Peterson, B. S. Yeo, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 7790-7798. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b01848
[199]
Y. Dong, J. Dang, W. Wang, S. Yin, Y. Wang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10, 39624-39630. DOI:10.1021/acsami.8b12573
[200]
J. S. Moon, J. H. Jang, E. G. Kim, Y. H. Chung, S. J. Yoo, Y. K. Lee, J. Catal., 2015, 326, 92-99. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2015.03.012
[201]
L. Bi, D. Xu, L. Zhang, Y. Lin, D. Wang, T. Xie, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 29899-29905. DOI:10.1039/C5CP05158D
[202]
K. Mori, T. Itoh, H. Kakudo, T. Iwamoto, Y. Masui, M. Onaka, H. Yamashita, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 24086-24091. DOI:10.1039/C5CP04493F
[203]
Z. Zhao, H. Yang, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2015, 398, 268-274. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2014.12.014
[204]
H. Wang, W. Chen, J. Zhang, C. P. Huang, L. Q. Mao, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40, 340-345. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.005
[205]
J. G. Yu, S. H. Wang, B. Cheng, Z. Lin, F. Huang, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2013, 3, 1782-1789. DOI:10.1039/c3cy20878h
[206]
G. C. Bi, J. Q. Wen, X. Li, W. Liu, J. Xie, Y. P. Fang, W. W. Zhang, RSC. Adv., 2016, 6, 31497-31506. DOI:10.1039/C6RA03118H
[207]
Z. P. Yan, Z. J. Sun, X. Liu, H. X. Jia, P. W. Du, Nanoscale, 2016, 8, 4748-4756. DOI:10.1039/C6NR00160B
[208]
S. S. Li, D. S. Dai, L. Ge, Y. Q. Gao, C. C. Han, N. Xiao, Dalton Trans., 2017, 46, 10620-10629. DOI:10.1039/C7DT00819H
[209]
J. G. Yu, Y. Hai, B. Cheng, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 4953-4958. DOI:10.1021/jp111562d
[210]
J. D. Hu, Y. L. Cao, J. Xie, D. Z. Jia, Ceram. Int., 2017, 43, 11109-11115. DOI:10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.05.157
[211]
N. L. Reddy, K. K. Cheralathan, V. D. Kumari, B. Neppolian, S. M. Venkatakrishnan, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 3754-3764. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04118
[212]
J. R. Ran, J. G. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Green Chem., 2011, 13, 2708-2713. DOI:10.1039/c1gc15465f
[213]
H. F. Dang, X. F. Dong, Y. C. Dong, H. B. Fan, Y. F. Qiu, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 44823-44826. DOI:10.1039/C4RA06867J
[214]
L. Yang, H. Y. Li, Y. Yu, H. W. Yu, Catal. Commun., 2018, 110, 51-54. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2018.03.014
[215]
J. Oliva, C. Gomez-solis, L. A. Diaz-Torres, A. Martinez-Luevanos, A. I. Martinez, E. Coutino-Gonzalez, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2018, 122, 1477-1485. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10375
[216]
Z. P. Yan, X. X. Yu, A. Han, P. Xu, P. W. Du, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 22896-22903. DOI:10.1021/jp5065402
[217]
Y. Xu, Y. Y. Gong, H. Ren, W. B. Liu, C. Li, X. J. Liu, L. Y. Niu, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 735, 2551-2557. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.388
[218]
Y. Z. Xia, W. H. Chen, S. J. Liang, J. H. Bi, L. Wu, X. X. Wang, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2017, 7, 5662-5669. DOI:10.1039/C7CY01792H
[219]
J. D. Hong, Y. S. Wang, Y. B. Wang, W. Zhang, R. Xu, ChemSusChem, 2013, 6, 2263-2268. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201300647
[220]
Z. H. Chen, P. Sun, B. Fan, Z. G. Zhang, X. M. Fang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 7801-7807. DOI:10.1021/jp5000232
[221]
L. S. Yin, Y. P. Yuan, S. W. Cao, Z. Y. Zhang, C. Xue, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 6127-6132. DOI:10.1039/c3ra46362a
[222]
J. Q. Wen, X. Li, H. Q. Li, S. Ma, K. L. He, Y. H. Xu, Y. P. Fang, W. Liu, Q. Z. Gao, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 358, 204-212. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.244
[223]
J. L. Yuan, J. Q. Wen, Y. M. Zhong, X. Li, Y. P. Fang, S. S. Zhang, W. Liu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 18244-18255. DOI:10.1039/C5TA04573H
[224]
Y. M. Zhong, J. L. Yuan, J. Q. Wen, X. Li, Y. H. Xu, W. Liu, S. S. Zhang, Y. P. Fang, Dalton Trans., 2015, 44, 18260-18269. DOI:10.1039/C5DT02693H
[225]
J. R. Ran, J. Zhang, J. G. Yu, S. Z. Qiao, ChemSusChem, 2014, 7, 3426-3434. DOI:10.1002/cssc.v7.12
[226]
J. J. Wang, Z. J. Li, X. B. Li, X. B. Fan, Q. Y. Meng, S. Yu, C. B. Li, J. X. Li, C. H. Tung, L. Z. Wu, ChemSusChem, 2014, 7, 1468-1475. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201400028
[227]
Z. J. Li, J. J. Wang, X. B. Li, X. B. Fan, Q. Y. Meng, K. Feng, B. Chen, C. H. Tung, L. Z. Wu, Adv. Mater., 2013, 25, 6613-6618. DOI:10.1002/adma.201302908
[228]
K. L. He, J. Xie, M. L. Li, X. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 430, 208-217. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.191
[229]
J. Zhang, S. Z. Qiao, L. F. Qi, J. G. Yu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15, 12088-12094.
[230]
F. Y. Xu, L. Y. Zhang, B. Cheng, J. G. Yu, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 12291-12298. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02710
[231]
J. Wang, B. Li, J. Z. Chen, N. Li, J. F. Zheng, J. H. Zhao, Z. P. Zhu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2012, 259, 118-123. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.003
[232]
L. Zhang, B. Z. Tian, F. Chen, J. L. Zhang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37, 17060-17067. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.08.120
[233]
J. F. Dong, M. Wang, X. Q. Li, L. Chen, Y. He, L. C. Sun, ChemSusChem, 2012, 5, 2133-2138.
[234]
G. G. Zhang, G. S. Li, X. C. Wang, ChemCatChem, 2015, 7, 2864-2870. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v7.18
[235]
D. Z. Lu, Q. P. Wang, K. K. Kondamareddy, A. X. Wang, H. J. Hao, Q. Wu, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 761, 31-40. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.05.149
[236]
Q. H. Zhu, B. C. Qiu, M. M. Du, M. Y. Xing, J. L. Zhang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2018, 57, 8125-8130.
[237]
K. He, J. Xie, Z. Q. Liu, N. Li, X. Chen, J. Hu, X. Li, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 13110-13122. DOI:10.1039/C8TA03048K
[238]
S. Ma, Y. P. Deng, J. Xie, K. L. He, W. Liu, X. B. Chen, X. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 227, 218-228. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.031
[239]
L. L. Bi, X. P. Gao, L. J. Zhang, D. J. Wang, X. X. Zou, T. F. Xie, ChemSusChem, 2018, 11, 276-284. DOI:10.1002/cssc.v11.1
[240]
D. P. Kumar, J. Choi, S. Hong, D. A. Reddy, S. Lee, T. K. Kim, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2016, 4, 7158-7166. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02032
[241]
H. C. Yang, R. Y. Cao, P. X. Sun, X. L. Deng, S. W. Zhang, X. J. Xu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 458, 893-902. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.07.149
[242]
T. F. Wu, P. F. Wang, J. Qian, Y. H. Ao, C. Wang, J. Hou, Dalton Trans., 2017, 46, 13793-13801. DOI:10.1039/C7DT02929B
[243]
A. Indra, A. Acharjya, P. W. Menezes, C. Merschjann, D. Hollmann, M. Schwarze, M. Aktas, A. Friedrich, S. Lochbrunner, A. Thomas, M. Driess, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 1653-1657. DOI:10.1002/anie.201611605
[244]
S. Kampouri, T. N. Nguyen, C. P. Ireland, B. Valizadeh, F. M. Ebrahim, G. Capano, D. Ongari, A. Mace, N. Guijarro, K. Sivula, A. Sienkiewicz, L. Forro, B. Smit, K. C. Stylianou, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 2476-2481. DOI:10.1039/C7TA10225A
[245]
T. F. Wu, P. F. Wang, Y. H. Ao, C. Wang, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2018, 525, 107-114. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2018.04.068
[246]
S. W. Cao, Y. P. Yuan, J. Barber, S. C. J. Loo, C. Xue, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014, 319, 344-349. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.04.094
[247]
D. H. Wang, Y. W. Zhang, W. Chen, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 1754-1756. DOI:10.1039/c3cc48141g
[248]
W. Zhang, Y. B. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. Y. Zhong, R. Xu, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 7631-7633. DOI:10.1039/c0cc01562h
[249]
S. Cao, Y. Chen, C. J. Wang, P. He, W. F. Fu, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 10427-10429. DOI:10.1039/C4CC05026F
[250]
L. G. Kong, Y. M. Dong, P. P. Jiang, G. L. Wang, H. Z. Zhang, N. Zhao, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 9998-10007. DOI:10.1039/C6TA03178A
[251]
M. H. Vu, C. C. Nguyen, M. Sakar, T. O. Do, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 29429-29437. DOI:10.1039/C7CP06085H
[252]
S. Chen, X. P. Chen, Q. Z. Jiang, J. Yuan, C. F. Lin, W. F. Shangguan, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014, 316, 590-594. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.053
[253]
G. X. Zhao, Y. B. Sun, W. Zhou, X. K. Wang, K. Chang, G. G. Liu, H. M. Liu, T. Kako, J. H. Ye, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1703258. DOI:10.1002/adma.201703258
[254]
S. Cao, C. J. Wang, X. J. Lv, Y. Chen, W. F. Fu, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 162, 381-391. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.07.014
[255]
T. Simon, N. Bouchonville, M. J. Berr, A. Vaneski, A. Adrovic, D. Volbers, R. Wyrwich, M. Doblinger, A. S. Susha, A. L. Rogach, F. Jackel, J. K. Stolarczyk, J. Feldmann, Nat. Mater., 2014, 13, 1013-1018. DOI:10.1038/nmat4049
[256]
W. T. Chen, A. Chan, D. Sun-Waterhouse, T. Moriga, H. Idriss, G. I. N. Waterhouse, J. Catal., 2015, 326, 43-53. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2015.03.008
[257]
Z. G. Chai, T. T. Zeng, Q. Li, L. Q. Lu, W. J. Xiao, D. S. Xu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, 10128-10131. DOI:10.1021/jacs.6b06860
[258]
C. Sun, H. Zhang, H. Liu, X. Zheng, W. Zou, L. Dong, L. Qi, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 235, 66-74. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.04.050
[259]
S. Onsuratoom, T. Puangpetch, S. Chavadej, Chem. Eng. J., 2011, 173, 667-675.
[260]
C. T. Dinh, M. H. Pham, F. Kleitz, T. O. Do, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 13308-13313. DOI:10.1039/c3ta12914d
[261]
X. Y. Li, H. Wang, T. T. Chu, D. Z. Li, L. Q. Mao, Mater. Res. Bull., 2014, 57, 254-259. DOI:10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.05.016
[262]
X. Chen, W. Chen, P. Lin, Y. Yang, H. Gao, J. Yuan, W. Shangguan, Catal. Commun., 2013, 36, 104-108. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2013.03.016
[263]
K. H. Chung, S. Jeong, B. J. Kim, J. S. Kim, Y. K. Park, S. C. Jung, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43, 5873-5880. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.065
[264]
M. H. Vu, M. Sakar, C. C. Nguyen, T. O. Do, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 4194-4203. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04598
[265]
N. Subha, M. Mahalakshmi, M. Myilsamy, N. L. Reddy, M. V. Shankar, B. Neppolian, V. Murugesan, Colloids Surfaces A, 2017, 522, 193-206. DOI:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.03.007
[266]
W. T. Chen, A. Chan, D. Sun-Waterhouse, J. Llorca, H. Idriss, G. I. N. Waterhouse, J. Catal., 2018, 367, 27-42. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2018.08.015
[267]
L. L. Bi, X. P. Gao, Z. C. Ma, L. J. Zhang, D. J. Wang, T. F. Xie, ChemCatChem, 2017, 9, 3779-3785. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201700640
[268]
W. L. Zhen, J. T. Ma, G. X. Lu, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 190, 12-25. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.02.061
[269]
S. Gullapelli, M. S. Scurrell, D. K. Valluri, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42, 15031-15043. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.239
[270]
R. Bashiri, N. M. Mohamed, C. F. Kait, S. Sufian, M. Khatani, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42, 9553-9566. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.225
[271]
H. Tian, S. Z. Kang, X. Li, L. Qin, M. Ji, J. Mu, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. C., 2015, 134, 309-317. DOI:10.1016/j.solmat.2014.12.016
[272]
C. E. Barrios, E. Albiter, J. M. Gracia, y Jimenez, H. Tiznado, J. Romo-Herrera, R. Zanella, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41, 23287-23300. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.206
[273]
C. Y. Wang, D. D. Sun, X. F. Yu, X. H. Zhang, Z. M. Lu, X. X. Wang, J. L. Zhao, L. L. Li, X. J. Yang, Inorg. Chem. Front., 2018, 5, 2038-2044. DOI:10.1039/C8QI00492G
[274]
A. L. Luna, D. Dragoe, K. L. Wang, P. Beaunier, E. Kowalska, B. Ohtani, D. B. Uribe, M. A. Valenzuela, H. Remita, C. Colbeau-Justin, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 121, 14302-14311. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01167
[275]
A. L. Luna, E. Novoseltceva, E. Louarn, P. Beaunier, E. Kowalska, B. Ohtani, M. A. Valenzuela, H. Remita, C. Colbeau-Justin, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 191, 18-28. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.008
[276]
W. L. Zhen, H. B. Gao, B. Tian, J. T. Ma, G. X. Lu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8, 10808-10819. DOI:10.1021/acsami.5b12524
[277]
T. Y. Peng, X. H. Zhang, P. Zeng, K. Li, X. G. Zhang, X. G. Li, J. Catal., 2013, 303, 156-163. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2013.03.026
[278]
P. Zeng, X. Zhang, X. Zhang, B. Chai, T. Peng, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2011, 503, 262-265. DOI:10.1016/j.cplett.2011.01.007
[279]
L. J. Fang, X. L. Wang, Y. H. Li, P. F. Liu, Y. L. Wang, H. D. Zeng, H. G. Yang, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 200, 578-584. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.07.033
[280]
J. Y. Liu, C. S. Zhuang, K. Li, T. Y. Peng, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 10944-10952. DOI:10.1039/C5CP00565E
[281]
K. Zhang, J. R. Ran, B. C. Zhu, H. X. Ju, J. G. Yu, L. Song, S. Z. Qiao, Small, 2018, 14, e1801705. DOI:10.1002/smll.v14.38
[282]
H. Husin, W. N. Su, H. M. Chen, C. J. Pan, S. H. Chang, J. Rick, W. T. Chuang, H. S. Sheu, B. J. Hwang, Green Chem., 2011, 13, 1745-1754. DOI:10.1039/c1gc15070g
[283]
E. T. Cui, G. X. Lu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39, 8959-8968. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.258
[284]
L. Fan, J. Long, Q. Gu, H. Huang, H. Lin, X. Wang, J. Catal., 2014, 320, 147-159. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2014.09.020
[285]
X. P. Chen, S. Chen, C. F. Lin, Z. Jiang, W. F. Shangguan, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40, 998-1004. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.058
[286]
S. Li, L. Zhang, T. Jiang, L. Chen, Y. Lin, D. Wang, T. Xie, Chem. Eur. J., 2014, 20, 311-316. DOI:10.1002/chem.201302679
[287]
Y. Sakata, Y. Matsuda, T. Yanagida, K. Hirata, H. Imamura, K. Teramura, Catal. Lett., 2008, 125, 22-26. DOI:10.1007/s10562-008-9557-7
[288]
H. W. Huang, J. J. Lin, L. Z. Fan, X. X. Wang, X. Z. Fu, J. L. Long, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2015, 119, 10478-10492.
[289]
Y. Ou, J. Lin, S. Fang, D. Liao, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2006, 429, 199-203. DOI:10.1016/j.cplett.2006.08.024
[290]
O. Quiroz-Cardoso, S. Oros-Ruiz, A. Solis-Gomez, R. Lopez, R. Gomez, Fuel, 2019, 237, 227-235. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.013
[291]
W. W. Yu, D. Zhang, X. W. Guo, C. S. Song, Z. K. Zhao, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2018, 8, 5148-5154. DOI:10.1039/C8CY01326H
[292]
L. Q. Mao, Q. Q. Ba, S. Liu, X. J. Jia, H. Liu, W. Chen, X. Y. Li, RSC Adv., 2018, 8, 31529-31537. DOI:10.1039/C8RA06581K
[293]
Y. Yamada, T. Miyahigashi, H. Kotani, K. Ohkubo, S. Fukuzumi, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 6111-6118. DOI:10.1039/c2ee03106j
[294]
P. D. Tran, L. F. Xi, S. K. Batabyal, L. H. Wong, J. Barber, J. S. C. Loo, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14, 11596-11599. DOI:10.1039/c2cp41450c
[295]
T. Sun, J. Fan, E. Liu, L. Liu, Y. Wang, H. Dai, Y. Yang, W. Hou, X. Hu, Z. Jiang, Powder Technol., 2012, 228, 210-218. DOI:10.1016/j.powtec.2012.05.018
[296]
Z. J. Sun, H. L. Chen, L. Zhang, D. P. Lu, P. W. Du, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 13289-13295. DOI:10.1039/C6TA04696G
[297]
F. Y. Chen, L. J. Zhang, X. W. Wang, R. B. Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 422, 962-969. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.214
[298]
S. Hu, F. Li, Z. Fan, J. Gui, J. Power Sources, 2014, 250, 30-39. DOI:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.10.132
[299]
A. M. Huert-aFlores, L. M. Torres-Martinez, E. Moctezuma, O. Ceballos-Sanchez, Fuel, 2016, 181, 670-679. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.025
[300]
Y. Wei, G. Cheng, J. Y. Xiong, F. F. Xu, R. Chen, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2017, 5, 5027-5038. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00417
[301]
X. B. Qian, W. Peng, Y. B. Shao, J. H. Huang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43, 2160-2170.
[302]
B. A. Nail, J. M. Fields, J. Zhao, J. R. Wang, M. J. Greaney, R. L. Brutchey, F. E. Osterloh, ACS Nano, 2015, 9, 5135-5142. DOI:10.1021/acsnano.5b00435
[303]
S. Oros-Ruiz, R. Zanella, S. E. Collins, A. Hernandez-Gordillo, R. Gomez, Catal. Commun., 2014, 47, 1-6. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2013.12.033
[304]
T. Sreethawong, Y. Suzuki, S. Yoshikawa, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2005, 30, 1053-1062. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.09.007
[305]
X. Z. Yue, S. S. Yi, R. W. Wang, Z. T. Zhang, S. L. Qiu, Sci. Rep., 2016, 6, 22268. DOI:10.1038/srep22268
[306]
X. Q. Ma, X. L. Cui, Z. Q. Zhao, M. A. Melo, E. J. Roberts, F. E. Osterloh, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 5774-5781. DOI:10.1039/C7TA10934B
[307]
M. F. Nsib, N. Naffati, A. Rayes, N. Moussa, A. Houas, Mater. Res. Bull., 2015, 70, 530-538. DOI:10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.04.067
[308]
E. P. Melian, M. N. Suarez, T. Jardiel, J. M. D. Rodriguez, A. C. Caballero, J. Arana, D. G. Calatayud, O. G. Diaz, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 152, 192-201.
[309]
I. Vamvasakis, I. T. Papadas, T. Tzanoudakis, C. Drivas, S. A. Choulis, S. Kennou, G. S. Armatas, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 8726-8738. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.8b01830
[310]
Q. C. Du, G. X. Lu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2014, 305, 235-241. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.03.043
[311]
Z. P. Yan, X. X. Yu, Y. Y. Zhang, H. X. Jia, Z. J. Sun, P. W. Du, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 160, 173-178.
[312]
P. Wang, Y. G. Lu, X. F. Wang, H. G. Yu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 391, 259-266. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.108
[313]
I. Majeed, M. A. Nadeem, E. Hussain, G. I. N. Waterhouse, A. Badshah, A. Iqbal, M. A. Nadeem, H. Idriss, ChemCatChem, 2016, 8, 3146-3155. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v8.19
[314]
H. L. Zhou, Y. X. Song, Y. C. Liu, H. D. Li, W. J. Li, Z. D. Chang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43, 14328-14336. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.05.172
[315]
J. M. Wang, Z. J. Wang, Z. P. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 204, 577-583. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.12.008
[316]
D. V. Markovskaya, E. A. Kozlova, E. Y. Gerasimov, A. V. Bukhtiyarov, D. V. Kozlov, Appl. Catal. A, 2018, 563, 170-176. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2018.07.002
[317]
R. Shen, W. Liu, D. Ren, J. Xie, X. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 466, 393-400. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.033
[318]
R. Song, W. Zhou, B. Luo, D. W. Jing, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 416, 957-964. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.221
[319]
X. Liu, L. H. Zhao, H. X. Wang, H. Lai, G. Peng, J. H. Li, Z. J. Yi, K. Chen, RSC Adv., 2018, 8, 34259-34265. DOI:10.1039/C8RA06770H
[320]
B. R. Wulan, S. S. Yi, S. J. Li, Y. X. Duan, J. M. Yan, Q. Jiang, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 231, 43-50. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.02.045
[321]
J. X. Xu, J. Y. Gao, Y. H. Qi, C. Wang, L. Wang, ChemCatChem, 2018, 10, 3327-3335. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201800353
[322]
M. Wu, J. Zhang, C. X. Liu, Y. S. Gong, R. Wang, B. B. He, H. W. Wang, ChemCatChem, 2018, 10, 3069-3077. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v10.14
[323]
K. Z. Qi, Y. B. Xie, R. D. Wang, S. Y. Liu, Z. Zhao, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 466, 847-853. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.037
[324]
J. Q. Wen, J. Xie, R. C. Shen, X. Li, X. Y. Luo, H. D. Zhang, A. P. Zhang, G. C. Bi, Dalton Trans., 2017, 46, 1794-1802. DOI:10.1039/C6DT04575H
[325]
J. J. Zhao, P. F. Liu, Y. L. Wang, Y. H. Li, M. Y. Zu, C. W. Wang, X. L. Wang, L. J. Fang, H. D. Zeng, H. G. Yang, Chem. Eur. J., 2017, 23, 16734-16737. DOI:10.1002/chem.201704040
[326]
W. L. Zhen, Y. P. Guo, Y. Q. Wu, G. X. Lu, New. J. Chem., 2017, 41, 13804-13811. DOI:10.1039/C7NJ01598D
[327]
J. X. Xu, Y. H. Qi, C. Wang, L. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 241, 178-186. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.035
[328]
S. Q. Peng, Y. Yang, J. N. Tan, C. Gan, Y. X. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 447, 822-828. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.050
[329]
Z. J. Sun, H. F. Zheng, J. S. Li, P. W. Du, Energy Environ. Sci., 2015, 8, 2668-2676. DOI:10.1039/C5EE01310K
[330]
K. Fan, Z. L. Jin, H. Yang, D. D. Liu, H. Y. Hu, Y. P. Bi, Sci. Rep., 2017, 7, 7710. DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-08163-y
[331]
Y. J. Hao, S. Z. Kang, X. Liu, X. Q. Li, L. X. Qin, J. Mu, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2017, 5, 1165-1172. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02499
[332]
J. S. Huang, Z. S. Shi, X. F. Dong, J. Energy Chem., 2016, 25, 136-140. DOI:10.1016/j.jechem.2015.11.007
[333]
X. L. Luo, G. L. He, Y. P. Fang, Y. H. Xu, J. Colloid Interfaces Sci., 2018, 518, 184-191. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2018.02.038
[334]
Y. X. Zhang, K. Li, Y. X. Yu, W. D. Zhang, J. Colloid Interfaces Sci., 2018, 526, 374-383. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2018.05.003
[335]
A. W. Peters, Z. Y. Li, O. K. Farha, J. T. Hupp, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8, 20675-20681. DOI:10.1021/acsami.6b04729
[336]
C. J. Chang, K. W. Chu, M. H. Hsu, C. Y. Chen, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40, 14498-14506. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.141
[337]
Z. Chen, S. Yang, Z. Tian, B. Zhu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 469, 657-665. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.241
[338]
J. Zhang, L. F. Qi, J. R. Ran, J. G. Yu, S. Z. Qiao, Adv. Energy Mater., 2014, 4, 1301925. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201301925
[339]
W. Zhang, R. Xu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37, 17899-17909. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.08.150
[340]
D. Jing, M. Liu, L. Guo, Catal. Lett., 2010, 140, 167-171. DOI:10.1007/s10562-010-0442-9
[341]
B. B. Wang, J. Q. Pan, Z. Y. Jiang, Z. J. Dong, C. Zhao, J. J. Wang, C. S. Song, Y. Y. Zheng, C. R. Li, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 766, 421-428. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.06.377
[342]
H. Yang, Z. L. Jin, H. Y. Hu, Y. P. Bi, G. X. Lu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 427, 587-597. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.021
[343]
H. Hao, L. Zhang, W. Wang, S. Zeng, ChemSusChem, 2018, 11, 2810-2817. DOI:10.1002/cssc.v11.16
[344]
H. Y. Wang, G. R. Wang, Z. W. Liu, Z. L. Jin, Mol. Catal., 2018, 453, 1-11. DOI:10.1016/j.mcat.2018.04.028
[345]
G. R. Wang, Z. L. Jin, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 467, 1239-1248.
[346]
Y. Huang, B. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 14804-14806. DOI:10.1002/anie.201708844
[347]
J. M. Lei, Q. X. Peng, S. P. Luo, Y. Liu, S. Z. Zhan, C. L. Ni, Mol. Catal., 2018, 448, 10-17. DOI:10.1016/j.mcat.2018.01.014
[348]
Z. J. Li, X. B. Fan, X. B. Li, J. X. Li, C. Ye, J. J. Wang, S. Yu, C. B. Li, Y. J. Gao, Q. Y. Meng, C. H. Tung, L. Z. Wu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 8261-8268. DOI:10.1021/ja5047236
[349]
S. Bala, I. Mondal, A. Goswami, U. Pal, R. Mondal, Dalton Trans., 2014, 43, 15704-15707. DOI:10.1039/C4DT02006E
[350]
Q. X. Peng, D. Xue, S. Z. Zhan, X. F. Jiang, Catal. Commun., 2018, 103, 15-18. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2017.09.014
[351]
B. Zhang, D. P. Hui, Y. X. Li, H. Zhao, C. Y. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 2039-2047. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62953-X
[352]
H. N. Kagalwala, E. Gottlieb, G. Li, T. Li, R. Jin, S. Bernhard, Inorg. Chem., 2013, 52, 9094-9101. DOI:10.1021/ic4013069
[353]
K. Mori, H. Kakudo, H. Yamashita, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 4129-4135. DOI:10.1021/cs501119d
[354]
V. Kalousek, K. Kikuta, T. C. Vagvala, K. Ikeue, Mater. Lett., 2017, 199, 65-67. DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2017.04.043
[355]
J. M. Lei, S. P. Luo, S. Z. Zhan, S. P. Wu, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2018, 95, 158-162. DOI:10.1016/j.inoche.2018.07.030
[356]
D. C. Jiang, R. M. Irfan, Z. J. Sun, D. P. Lu, P. W. Du, ChemSusChem, 2016, 9, 3084-3092. DOI:10.1002/cssc.v9.21
[357]
C. A. Caputo, M. A. Gross, V. W. Lau, C. Cavazza, B. V. Lotsch, E. Reisner, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2014, 53, 11538-11542. DOI:10.1002/anie.201406811
[358]
Z. J. Han, L. X. Shen, W. W. Brennessel, P. L. Holland, R. Eisenberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 14659-14669. DOI:10.1021/ja405257s
[359]
R. Shen, C. Jiang, Q. Xiang, J. Xie, X. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 471, 43-87. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.205
[360]
Z. L. Zhao, X. L. Wang, Z. Shu, J. Zhou, T. T. Li, W. B. Wang, Y. G. Tan, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 455, 591-598. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.215
[361]
M. J. Chen, Y. Huang, S. C. Lee, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 348-356. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62584-6
[362]
A. Meng, S. Wu, B. Cheng, J. Yu, J. Xu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 4729-4736. DOI:10.1039/C7TA10073F
[363]
X. Zhang, Y. J. Chen, Y. T. Xiao, W. Zhou, G. H. Tian, H. G. Fu, Nanoscale, 2018, 10, 4041-4050. DOI:10.1039/C7NR09415A
[364]
X. Li, J. Wen, J. Low, Y. Fang, J. Yu, Sci. China Mater., 2014, 57, 70-100.
[365]
C. Kong, S. X. Min, G. X. Lu, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 2763-2769. DOI:10.1021/cs5006844
[366]
Y. Ma, Y. Bian, Y. Liu, A. Zhu, H. Wu, H. Cui, D. Chu, J. Pan, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 2552-2562. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04049
[367]
J. G. Yu, J. Zhang, M. Jaroniec, Green Chem., 2010, 12, 1611-1614. DOI:10.1039/c0gc00236d
[368]
L. Ge, F. Zuo, J. K. Liu, Q. Ma, C. Wang, D. Z. Sun, L. Bartels, P. Y. Feng, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 13708-13714. DOI:10.1021/jp3041692
[369]
Y. X. Pan, T. H. Zhou, J. Y. Han, J. D. Hong, Y. B. Wang, W. Zhang, R. Xu, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6, 2206-2213. DOI:10.1039/C5CY01634G
[370]
Y. J. Zou, J. W. Shi, D. D. Ma, Z. Y. Fan, L. H. Cheng, D. K. Sun, Z. Y. Wang, C. M. Niu, ChemSusChem, 2018, 11, 1187-1197. DOI:10.1002/cssc.v11.7
[371]
Y. Pang, L. Song, C. Chen, L. Ge, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 420, 361-370. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.118
[372]
Z. Wang, J. Zhang, J. Lv, K. Dai, C. Liang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 396, 791-798. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.031
[373]
J. Chu, P. Miao, X. Han, Y. Du, X. Wang, B. Song, P. Xu, ChemCatChem, 2016, 8, 1819-1824. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v8.10
[374]
X. Hu, J. Tian, Y. Xue, Y. Li, H. Cui, ChemCatChem, 2017, 9, 1511-1516. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201601719
[375]
K. K. Patra, C. S. Gopinath, ChemCatChem, 2016, 8, 3294-3301. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201600937
[376]
Y. Liu, Y. Mao, X. Tang, Y. Xu, C. Li, F. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 1726-1735. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62902-4
[377]
J. B. Priebe, J. Radnik, C. Kreyenschulte, A. J. J. Lennox, H. Junge, M. Beller, A. Bruckner, ChemCatChem, 2017, 9, 1025-1031. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v9.6
[378]
Z. L. Ni, W. D. Zhang, G. M. Jiang, X. P. Wang, Z. Z. Lu, Y. J. Sun, X. W. Li, Y. X. Zhang, F. Dong, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 1174-1183. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62849-3
[379]
X. L. Yang, Y. Wang, X. Xu, Y. Qu, X. Ding, H. Chen, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 260-269. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62553-6
[380]
Y. R. Li, Y. Guo, R. Long, D. Liu, D. M. Zhao, Y. B. Tan, C. Gao, S. H. Shen, Y. J. Xiong, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 453-462. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62938-3
[381]
Z. Mo, H. Xu, Z. G. Chen, X.J. She, Y. H. Song, P. C. Yan, Y. G. Xu, Y. C. Lei, S. Q. Yuan, H. M. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 760-770. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62978-4
[382]
J. Li, S. Meng, T. Wang, Q. Xu, L. Shao, D. Jiang, M. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 396, 430-437.
[383]
N. F. Jaafar, A. A. Jalil, S. Triwahyono, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 392, 1068-1077. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.112
[384]
Z. Y. Zhang, J. D. Huang, Y. R. Fang, M. Y. Zhang, K. C. Liu, B. Dong, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1606688. DOI:10.1002/adma.201606688
[385]
N. Lu, Z. Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, B. K. Liu, L. J. Guo, L. Wang, J. D. Huang, K. C. Liu, B. Dong, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 233, 19-25. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.03.073
[386]
H. Yin, Y. Kuwahara, K. Mori, H. Yamashita, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 10932-10938. DOI:10.1039/C8TA03125H
[387]
H. Yin, Y. Kuwahara, K. Mori, H. Cheng, M. Wen, Y. Huo, H. Yamashita, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 121, 23531-23540. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08403
[388]
H. Cheng, X. Qian, Y. Kuwahara, K. Mori, H. Yamashita, Adv. Mater., 2015, 27, 4616-4621. DOI:10.1002/adma.v27.31
[389]
M. C. Long, L. H. Zheng, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 617-624. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62821-3
[390]
S. H. Wei, S. Ni, X. X. Xu, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 510-516. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62968-1
[391]
H. M. Zhao, Y. F. He, M. Y. Liu, R. Wang, Y. H. Li, W. S. You, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 495-501. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62946-2
[392]
H. L. Jiang, J. Liu, M. L. Li, L. Tian, G. S. Ding, P. H. Chen, X. B. Luo, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 747-759. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63038-4
[393]
Z. Y. Huang, Z. G. Gao, S. M. Gao, Q. Y. Wang, Z. Y. Wang, B. B. Huang, Y. Dai, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 821-830. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62825-0
[394]
N. An, Y. W. Ma, J. M. Liu, H. Y. Ma, J. C. Yang, Q. C. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 1890-1900. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63152-3
[395]
X. H. Li, Y. Wu, Y. H. Shen, Y. Sun, Y. Yang, A. J. Xie, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 427, 739-744. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.091
[396]
H. Y. Li, F. Z. Ren, Q. Y. Li, J. J. Yang, Y. X. Wang, Z. X. Cheng, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 457, 633-643. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.201
[397]
M. Dorraj, B. T. Goh, N. A. Sairi, P. M. Woi, W. J. Basirun, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 439, 999-1009. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.248
[398]
C. F. Yang, W. Teng, Y. H. Song, Y. J. Cui, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 1615-1624. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63131-6
[399]
J. T. Gao, Y. Wang, S. J. Zhou, W. Lin, Y. Kong, ChemCatChem, 2017, 9, 1708-1715. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201700492
[400]
Y. Y. Wang, S. Zhao, Y. W. Zhang, J. S. Fang, Y. M. Zhou, S. H. Yuan, C. Zhang, W. X. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 440, 258-265. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.091
[401]
J. Jiang, S. W. Cao, C. L. Hu, C. H. Chen, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 1981-1989. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62936-X
[402]
Q. J. Fan, J. J. Liu, Y. C. Yu, S. L. Zuo, B. S. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 391, 360-368. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.04.055
[403]
S. Liu, H. L. Zhu, W. Q. Yao, K. Chen, D. M. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 430, 309-315. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.108
[404]
X. H. Li, J. Zhang, F. Zhou, H. L. Zhang, J. Bai, Y. J. Wang, H. Y. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 1090-1098. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63046-3
[405]
Y. Q. Huang, Q. Yan, H. J. Yan, Y. Q. Tang, S. Chen, Z. Y. Yu, C. G. Tian, B. J. Jiang, ChemCatChem, 2017, 9, 4083-4089. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v9.21
[406]
M. Jothibas, C. Manoharan, S. J. Jeyakumar, P. Praveen, I. K. Punithavathy, J. P. Richard, Sol. Energy, 2018, 159, 434-443. DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2017.10.055
[407]
X. H. Zhang, D. W. Jing, M. C. Liu, L. J. Guo, Catal. Commun., 2008, 9, 1720-1724. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2008.01.032
[408]
A. Kudo, M. Sekizawa, Chem. Commun., 2000, 1371-1372.
[409]
C. Regmi, Y. K. Kshetri, T. H. Kim, R. P. Pandey, S. K. Ray, S. W. Lee, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 413, 253-265. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.056
[410]
P. Pascariu, I. V. Tudose, M. Suchea, E. Koudoumas, N. Fifere, A. Airinei, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 448, 481-488. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.124
[411]
N. Baliarsingh, L. Mohapatra, K. Parida, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 4236-4243. DOI:10.1039/c2ta00933a
[412]
Q. Y. Tian, W. J. Yao, W. Wu, J. Liu, Z. H. Wu, L. Liu, Z. G. Dai, C. Z. Jiang, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2017, 5, 10889-10899. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02806
[413]
E. Cheng, S. Zhou, M. Li, Z. Q. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 410, 383-392. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.052
[414]
C. Regmi, Y. K. Kshetri, S. K. Ray, R. P. Pandey, S. W. Lee, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 392, 61-70. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.024
[415]
X. Y. Kong, W. L. Tan, B. J. Ng, S. P. Chai, A. R. Mohamed, Nano Res., 2017, 10, 1720-1731. DOI:10.1007/s12274-017-1435-4
[416]
X. Y. Xia, N. Deng, G. W. Cui, J. F. Xie, X. F. Shi, Y. Q. Zhao, Q. Wang, W. Wang, B. Tang, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 10899-10902. DOI:10.1039/C5CC02589C
[417]
S. Y. Bian, C. J. Zhou, P. R. Li, J. Y. Liu, X. P. Dong, F. N. Xi, ChemCatChem, 2017, 9, 3349-3357. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201601594
[418]
Y. T. Gao, F. Hou, S. Hu, B. G. Wu, Y. Wang, H. Q. Zhang, B. J. Jiang, H. G. Fu, ChemCatChem, 2018, 10, 1330-1335. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v10.6
[419]
S. K. Muduli, E. Varrla, Y. Xu, S. A. Kulkarni, A. Katre, S. Chakraborty, S. Chen, T. C. Sum, R. Xu, N. Mathews, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 24874-24879. DOI:10.1039/C7TA04889K
[420]
M. S. Zhu, X. Y. Cai, M. Fujitsuka, J. Y. Zhang, T. Majima, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 2064-2068. DOI:10.1002/anie.201612315
[421]
M. S. Zhu, S. Kim, L. Mao, M. Fujitsuka, J. Y. Zhang, X. C. Wang, T. Majima, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 13234-13242. DOI:10.1021/jacs.7b08416
[422]
M. S. Zhu, Y. Osakada, S. Kim, M. Fujitsuka, T. Majima, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 217, 285-292. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.002
[423]
X. J. Zhu, T. M. Zhang, Z. J. Sun, H. L. Chen, J. Guan, X. Chen, H. X. Ji, P. W. Du, S. F. Yang, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1605776. DOI:10.1002/adma.v29.17
[424]
X. Y. Cai, L. Mao, S. Q. Yang, K. L. Han, J. Y. Zhang, ACS Energy Lett., 2018, 3, 932-939. DOI:10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00126
[425]
L. Q. Kong, Y. J. Ji, Z. Z. Dang, J. Q. Yan, P. Li, Y. Y. Li, S. Z. Liu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 1800668. DOI:10.1002/adfm.v28.22
[426]
W. Y. Lei, Y. Mi, R. J. Feng, P. Liu, S. Hu, J. G. Yu, X. F. Liu, J. A. Rodriguez, J. O. Wang, L. Zheng, K. Tang, S. X. Zhu, G. Liu, M. H. Liu, Nano Energy, 2018, 50, 552-561. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.001
[427]
B. Tian, B. N. Tian, B. Smith, M. C. Scott, R. N. Hua, Q. Lei, Y. Tian, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 1397. DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-03737-4
[428]
H. T. Zhao, H. Y. Liu, R. R. Sun, Y. L. Chen, X. Y. Li, ChemCatChem, 2018, 10, 4395-4405. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v10.19
[429]
Q. S. Liang, F. B. Shi, X. F. Xiao, X. F. Wu, K. K. Huang, S. H. Feng, ChemCatChem, 2018, 10, 2179-2183. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v10.10
[430]
M. S. Zhu, C. Y. Zhai, M. Fujitsuka, T. Majima, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 221, 645-651. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.09.063
[431]
L. Wang, M. J. Cai, W. Sun, L. He, X. H. Zhang, Adv. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 5, 1701694. DOI:10.1002/admi.v5.13
[432]
H. Tong, S. X. Ouyang, Y. P. Bi, N. Umezawa, M. Oshikiri, J. H. Ye, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, 229-251. DOI:10.1002/adma.201102752
[433]
F. E. Osterloh, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2013, 42, 2294-2320. DOI:10.1039/C2CS35266D
[434]
A. Kubacka, M. Fernandez-Garcia, G. Colon, Chem. Rev., 2012, 112, 1555-1614. DOI:10.1021/cr100454n
[435]
J. L. Yuan, J. Q. Wen, Q. Z. Gao, S. C. Chen, J. M. Li, X. Li, Y. P. Fang, Dalton Trans., 2015, 44, 1680-1689. DOI:10.1039/C4DT03197K
[436]
S. L. Shen, A. P. Ma, Z. H. Tang, Z. Han, M. J. Wang, Z. Wang, L. J. Zhi, J. H. Yang, ChemCatChem, 2015, 7, 609-615. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201402872
[437]
X. M. Xiang, L. J. Chou, X. H. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 407-412. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62970-X
[438]
L. J. Bai, X. T. Cai, J. J. Lu, L. N. Li, S. X. Zhong, L. Wu, P. J. Gong, J. R. Chen, S. Bai, ChemCatChem, 2018, 10, 2107-2114. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v10.9
[439]
Z. J. Sun, X. Liu, Q. D. Yue, H. X. Jia, P. W. Du, ChemCatChem, 2016, 8, 157-162. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201500789
[440]
W. Y. Zhang, Y. X. Li, S. Q. Peng, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 13072-13078. DOI:10.1039/C7TA03458J
[441]
M. Zhukovskyi, P. Tongying, H. Yashan, Y. X. Wang, M. Kuno, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 6615-6623. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.5b01812
[442]
G. Q. Han, Y. H. Jin, R. A. Burgess, N. E. Dickenson, X. M. Cao, Y. J. Sun, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 15584-15587. DOI:10.1021/jacs.7b08657
[443]
S. Xing, P. Lv, H. Yuan, L. Yang, Z. Wang, Z. Yuan, Y. Chen, Green Chem., 2017, 19, 4157-4168. DOI:10.1039/C7GC01853C
[444]
X. Li, R. Shen, S. Ma, X. Chen, J. Xie, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 430, 53-107. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.194
[445]
D. Mateo, J. Albero, H. Garcia, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 224, 563-571. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.071
[446]
H. Kasap, R. Godin, C. Jeay-Bizot, D. S. Achilleos, X. Fang, J. R. Durrant, E. Reisner, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 6914-6926. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.8b01969
[447]
P. Kuang, B. Zhu, Y. Li, H. Liu, J. Yu, K. Fan, Nanoscale Horiz., 2018, 3, 317-326. DOI:10.1039/C8NH00027A
[448]
S. Y. Zhang, X. X. Xiao, T. T. Lv, X. M. Lv, B. T. Liu, W. Wei, J. Liu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 446, 10-17. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.033
[449]
Q. M. Yang, J. L. Duan, W. Yang, X. M. Li, J. H. Mo, P. Z. Yang, Q. W. Tang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 434, 1079-1085. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.040
[450]
G. P. Liu, B. Wang, L. Xu, P. H. Ding, P. F. Zhang, J. X. Xia, H. M. Li, J. C. Qian, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 790-799. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62982-6
[451]
M. Nazirfakhr, E. Zaminpayma, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 458, 210-215. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.07.056
[452]
X. B. Li, Y. J. Gao, H. L. Wu, Y. Wang, Q. Guo, M. Y. Huang, B. Chen, C. H. Tung, L. Z. Wu, Chem. Commun., 2017, 53, 5606-5609. DOI:10.1039/C7CC02366A
[453]
Q. Liu, Q. C. Shang, A. Khalil, Q. Fang, S. M. Chen, Q. He, T. Xiang, D. B. Liu, Q. Zhang, Y. Luo, L. Song, ChemCatChem, 2016, 8, 2614-2619. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201600504
[454]
H. Du, H. L. Guo, Y. N. Liu, X. Xie, K. Liang, X. Zhou, X. Wang, A. W. Xu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8, 4023-4030. DOI:10.1021/acsami.5b11377
[455]
Z. G. Chen, K. X. Xia, X. J. She, Z. Mo, S. W. Zhao, J. J. Yi, Y. G. Xu, H. X. Chen, H. Xu, H. M. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 447, 732-739. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.226
[456]
H. Du, X. Xie, Q. Zhu, L. Lin, Y. F. Jiang, Z. K. Yang, X. Zhou, A. W. Xu, Nanoscale, 2015, 7, 5752-5759. DOI:10.1039/C4NR06949H
[457]
J. R. Ran, G. P. Gao, F. T. Li, T. Y. Ma, A. J. Du, S. Z. Qiao, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 13907. DOI:10.1038/ncomms13907
[458]
X. Q. An, W. Wang, J. P. Wang, H. Z. Duan, J. T. Shi, X. L. Yu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018, 20, 11405-11411. DOI:10.1039/C8CP01123K
[459]
C. Ji, S. N. Yin, S. S. Sun, S. Y. Yang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 434, 1224-1231. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.233
[460]
L. P. Zhang, M. Jaroniec, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 430, 2-17. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.192
[461]
M. C. Liu, Y. B. Chen, J. Z. Su, J. W. Shi, X. X. Wang, L. J. Guo, Nature Energy, 2016, 1, 16151. DOI:10.1038/nenergy.2016.151
[462]
J. X. Wang, Z. Z. Zhang, X. Wang, Y. Shen, Y. F. Guo, P. K. Wong, R. B. Bai, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 1792-1803. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63142-0
[463]
Y. Z. Liu, S. S. Ding, J. Xu, H. Y. Zhang, S. G. Yang, X. G. Duan, H. Q. Sun, S. B. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 1052-1062. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62845-6
[464]
H. Y. Hafeez, S. K. Lakhera, P. Karthik, M. Anpo, B. Neppolian, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 449, 772-779. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.282
[465]
A. Singh, A. S. K. Sinha, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 430, 184-197. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.214
[466]
L. Pan, J. W. Zhang, X. Jia, Y. H. Ma, X. W. Zhang, L. Wang, J. J. Zou, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 253-259. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62576-7
[467]
W. H. Xue, X. Y. Hu, E. Z. Liu, J. Fan, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 447, 783-794. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.048
[468]
K. Z. Qi, B. Cheng, J. G. Yu, W. K. Ho, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 1936-1955. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62962-0
[469]
J. G. Yu, S. H. Wang, J. X. Low, W. Xiao, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15, 16883-16890. DOI:10.1039/c3cp53131g
[470]
J. Li, M. Zhang, X. Li, Q. Y. Li, J. J. Yang, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 212, 106-114. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.04.061
[471]
J. Li, M. Zhang, Q. Y. Li, J. J. Yang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 391, 184-193. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.145
[472]
W. K. Jo, T. S. Natarajan, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 281, 549-565. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.120
[473]
J. J. Liu, B. Cheng, J. G. Yu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2016, 18, 31175-31183. DOI:10.1039/C6CP06147H
[474]
L. B. Jiang, X. Z. Yuan, G. M. Zeng, J. Liang, X. H. Chen, H. B. Yu, H. Wang, Z. B. Wu, J. Zhang, T. Xiong, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 227, 376-385. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.042
[475]
W. L. Yu, J. X. Chen, T. T. Shang, L. F. Chen, L. Gu, T. Y. Peng, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 219, 693-704. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.018
[476]
B. C. Zhu, P. F. Xia, Y. Li, W. K. Ho, J. G. Yu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 391, 175-183. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.104
[477]
Z. Qin, W. J. Fang, J. Y. Liu, Z. D. Wei, Z. Jiang, W. F. Shangguan, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 472-478. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62961-9
[478]
J. F. Zhang, Y. F. Hu, X. L. Jiang, S. F. Chen, S. G. Meng, X. L. Fu, J. Hazard. Mater., 2014, 280, 713-722. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.08.055
[479]
S. L. Liu, J. L. Chen, D. F. Xu, X. C. Zhang, M. Y. Shen, J. Mater. Res., 2018, 33, 1391-1400. DOI:10.1557/jmr.2018.67
[480]
L. P. Zhang, G. H. Wang, Z. Z. Xiong, H. Tang, C. J. Jiang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 436, 162-171. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.280
[481]
R. A. He, J. Q. Zhou, H. Q. Fu, S. Y. Zhang, C. J. Jiang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 430, 273-282. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.191
[482]
J. Wang, Y. Xia, H. Y. Zhao, G. F. Wang, L. Xiang, J. L. Xu, S. Komarneni, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 206, 406-416. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.067
[483]
Z. F. Dong, Y. Wu, N. Thirugnanam, G. L. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 430, 293-300. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.186
[484]
N. Nie, L. Y. Zhang, J. W. Fu, B. Cheng, J. G. Yu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 441, 12-22. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.193
[485]
W. L. Yu, D. F. Xu, T. Y. Peng, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 19936-19947. DOI:10.1039/C5TA05503B
[486]
P. Murugesan, S. Narayanan, M. Manickam, P. K. Murugesan, R. Subbiah, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 450, 516-526. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.111
[487]
Z. Zhao, Y. B. Xing, H. B. Li, P. Y. Feng, Z. C. Sun, Sci. Chin-aMater., 2018, 61, 851-860. DOI:10.1007/s40843-017-9170-6
[488]
A. Y. Meng, B. C. Zhu, B. Zhong, L. Y. Zhang, B. Cheng, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 422, 518-527. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.028
[489]
K. Ma, O. Yehezkeli, D. W. Domaille, H. H. Funke, J. N. Cha, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 11490-11494. DOI:10.1002/anie.201504155
[490]
J. S. Lu, Y. J. Wang, F. Liu, L. Zhang, S. N. Chai, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 393, 180-190. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.10.003
[491]
H. Q. Gao, P. Zhang, J. H. Hu, J. M. Pan, J. J. Fan, G. S. Shao, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 391, 211-217. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.170
[492]
L. J. Zhang, S. Li, B. K. Liu, D. Wang, T. F. Xie, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 3724-3729. DOI:10.1021/cs500794j
[493]
T. P. Hu, P. F. Li, J. F. Zhang, C. H. Liang, K. Dai, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 442, 20-29.
[494]
P. F. Xia, B. C. Zhu, B. Cheng, J. G. Yu, J. S. Xu, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 965-973. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03289
[495]
Y. H. Fu, Z. J. Li, Q. Q. Liu, X. F. Yang, H. Tang, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 2160-2170. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62911-5
[496]
R. Z. Sun, Q. M. Shi, M. Zhang, L. H. Xie, J. S. Chen, X. M. Yang, M. X. Chen, W. R. Zhao, J. Alloys Compd., 2017, 714, 619-626. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.108
[497]
T. M. Di, B. C. Zhu, B. Cheng, J. G. Yu, J. S. Xu, J. Catal., 2017, 352, 532-541. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2017.06.006
[498]
F. Zhang, L. P. Wang, M. Xiao, F. Liu, X. Xu, E. D. Du, J. Mater. Res., 2018, 33, 201-212. DOI:10.1557/jmr.2017.434
[499]
J. F. Zhang, J. W. Fu, Z. L. Wang, B. Cheng, K. Dai, W. K. Ho, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 766, 841-850. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.07.041
[500]
N. Manfredi, M. Monai, T. Montini, F. Peri, F. De Angelis, P. Fornasiero, A. Abbotto, ACS Energy Lett., 2018, 3, 85-91. DOI:10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00896
[501]
Y. C. Wang, J. Zhou, X. Q. Hao, Y. Wang, Z. G. Zou, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 456, 861-870. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.181
[502]
S. Y. Wang, B. Zeng, C. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 1219-1227. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63094-3
[503]
J. R. Ran, W. W. Guo, H. L. Wang, B. C. Zhu, J. G. Yu, S. Z. Qiao, Adv. Mater., 2018, 30, 1800128. DOI:10.1002/adma.v30.25
[504]
S. Ma, J. Xie, J. Q. Wen, K. L. He, X. Li, W. Liu, X. C. Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 391, 580-591. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.067
[505]
J. Low, S. Cao, J. Yu, S. Wageh, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 10768-10777. DOI:10.1039/C4CC02553A
[506]
C. M. Wang, S. Bai, Y. J. Xiong, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36, 1476-1493. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(15)60911-1
[507]
A. Dutta, A. M. Appel, W. J. Shaw, Nat. Rev. Chem., 2018, 2, 244-252. DOI:10.1038/s41570-018-0032-8
[508]
V. R. Stamenkovic, D. Strmcnik, P. P. Lopes, N. M. Markovic, Nat. Mater., 2017, 16, 57-69. DOI:10.1038/nmat4738
[509]
I. Roger, M. A. Shipman, M. D. Symes, Nat. Rev. Chem., 2017, 1, 0003. DOI:10.1038/s41570-016-0003
[510]
B. Ginovsk-aPangovska, A. Dutta, M. L. Reback, J. C. Linehan, W. J. Shaw, Acc. Chem. Res., 2014, 47, 2621-2630. DOI:10.1021/ar5001742
[511]
J. F. Xie, Y. Xie, ChemCatChem, 2015, 7, 2568-2580. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201500396
[512]
X. B. He, F. X. Yin, H. Wang, B. H. Chen, G. R. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 207-227. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63017-7
[513]
L. S. Peng, S. S. A. Shah, Z. D. Wei, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 1575-1593. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63130-4
[514]
P. Z. Chen, Y. Tong, C. Z. Wu, Y. Xie, Acc. Chem. Res., 2018, 51, 2857-2866. DOI:10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00266
[515]
B. P. Hahn, J. W. Long, D. R. Rolison, Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, 46, 1181-1191. DOI:10.1021/ar200238w
[516]
H. L. Jiang, Q. He, Y. K. Zhang, L. Song, Acc. Chem. Res., 2018, 51, 2968-2977. DOI:10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00449
[517]
N. L. Yang, D. Wang, Chem., 2018, 4, 2262-2264. DOI:10.1016/j.chempr.2018.09.013
[518]
P. Strasser, M. Gliech, S. Kuehl, T. Moeller, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2018, 47, 715-735. DOI:10.1039/C7CS00759K
[519]
X. Y. Ma, J. Q. Li, C. H. An, J. Feng, Y. H. Chi, J. X. Liu, J. Zhang, Y. G. Sun, Nano Res., 2016, 9, 2284-2293. DOI:10.1007/s12274-016-1115-9
[520]
H. W. Man, C. S. Tsang, M. M. J. Li, J. Y. Mo, B. L. Huang, L. Y. S. Lee, Y. C. Leung, K. Y. Wong, S. C. E. Tsang, Appl. Catal. B, 2019, 242, 186-193. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.103
[521]
X. Y. Lu, J. Xie, S. Y. Liu, A. Adamski, X. B. Chen, X. Li, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 13140-13150. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02653
[522]
S. W. Cao, B. J. Shen, Q. Huang, Z. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 442, 361-367. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.105
[523]
D. Q. Zeng, W. J. Xu, W. J. Ong, J. Xu, H. Ren, Y. Z. Chen, H. F. Zheng, D. L. Peng, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 221, 47-55. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.041
[524]
A. Q. Wang, J. Li, T. Zhang, Nat. Rev. Chem., 2018, 2, 65-81. DOI:10.1038/s41570-018-0010-1
[525]
X. G. Li, W. T. Bi, L. Zhang, S. Tao, W. S. Chu, Q. Zhang, Y. Luo, C. Z. Wu, Y. Xie, Adv. Mater., 2016, 28, 2427-2431. DOI:10.1002/adma.201505281
[526]
H. J. Qiu, Y. Ito, W. T. Cong, Y. W. Tan, P. Liu, A. Hirata, T. Fujita, Z. Tang, M. W. Chen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 14031-14035. DOI:10.1002/anie.201507381