催化学报  2019, Vol. 40 Issue (3): 326-334   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Li Zhen
Xia Wang
Jinfeng Zhang
Changhao Liang
Luhua Lu
Kai Dai
Preparation of Z-scheme WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity and durability
Li Zhena, Xia Wangc, Jinfeng Zhanga, Changhao Liangb, Luhua Lud, Kai Daia     
a. School of Physics and Electronic Information, Anhui Key Laboratory of Energetic Materials, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei 235000, Anhui, China;
b. Key Laboratory of Materials Physics and Anhui Key Laboratory of Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology, Institute of Solid State Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, Anhui, China;
c. Department of Mechanical Engineering and Design, Botou Vocational College, Cangzhou 062150, Hebei, China;
d. Engineering Research Center of Nano-Geomaterials of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China
* Corresponding author. Jinfeng Zhang, Tel: +86-561-3803394; Fax: +86-561-3803256; E-mail: jfzhang@chnu.edu.cn;
Kai Dai, Tel: +86-561-3803394; Fax: +86-561-3803256; E-mail: daikai940@chnu.edu.cn
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51572103 and 51502106), the Distinguished Young Scholar of Anhui Province (1808085J14), the Foundation for Young Talents in College of Anhui Province (gxyqZD2017051), the Key Foundation of Educational Commission of Anhui Province (KJ2016SD53), and the Innovation Team of Design and Application of Advanced Energetic Materials (KJ2015TD003)
Abstract: Ag3PO4 is widely used in the field of photocatalysis because of its unique activity. However, photocorrosion limits its practical application. Therefore, it is very urgent to find a solution to improve the light corrosion resistance of Ag3PO4. Herein, the Z-scheme WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites are successfully prepared through microwave hydrothermal and simple stirring. The WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites are characterized by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and UV-Vis spectroscopy. In the degradation of organic pollutants, WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites exhibit excellent performance under visible light. This is mainly attributed to the synergy of WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4. Especially, the photocatalytic activity of 15% WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 is the highest, and the methylene blue can be completely degraded in 4 min. In addition, the stability of the composites is also greatly enhanced. After five cycles of testing, the photocatalytic activity of 15% WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 is not obviously decreased. However, the degradation efficiency of Ag3PO4 was only 20.2%. This indicates that adding WO3(H2O)0.333 can significantly improve the photoetching resistance of Ag3PO4. Finally, Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism is investigated.
© 2019, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Photocatalysis    Ag3PO4    WO3(H2O)0.333    Composites    Z-scheme    
Z-机制WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4复合材料的制备及其增强光催化活性和稳定性
李真a, 王侠c, 张金锋a, 梁长浩b, 芦露华d, 代凯a     
a. 淮北师范大学物理与电子信息学院, 安徽省含能材料重点实验室, 安徽淮北 235000;
b. 中国科学院固体物理研究所, 中国科学院材料物理重点实验室和安徽省纳米材料与技术重点实验室, 安徽合肥 230031;
c. 泊头职业学院机械设计系, 河北沧州 062150;
d. 中国地质大学纳米矿物材料及应用教育部工程研究中心, 湖北武汉 430074
摘要:Ag3PO4由于具有独特的活性而被广泛应用于光催化领域.然而,由于其光生电子和空穴的快速复合,Ag3PO4的光催化性能在几个循环之后显著下降,光腐蚀限制了它的实际应用.因此,亟需设计一种新型的复合光催化剂来抑制电子空穴对的快速复合.而Z型复合光催化剂可综合不同光催化剂的优点,克服单一光催化剂的缺点.Z方案体系使用两个窄带隙的催化剂取代宽带隙的光催化剂,从而可以捕获更多的光子.并且光催化剂的氧化还原反应分开进行,可以有效地防止电子和空穴的复合,从而大大提高复合光催化剂的性能.本文通过微波水热法和简单搅拌法成功地制备了Z机制WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4复合材料.采用X射线衍射、扫描电子显微镜、X射线光电子能谱、N2吸附-解吸等温线、比表面积测定、紫外-可见光谱和光电流曲线等方法对WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4复合材料进行了表征.通过这些表征,我们确定了所研究的光催化剂物相高度匹配;确定了光催化剂的形貌:确定了复合光催化剂是复合物,而不是简单的混合物;确定了光催化剂中光生电子和空穴的结合、分离效率;研究了光催化剂的吸收边以及带隙.光催化降解测试发现,WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4复合材料在可见光下表现出优异的催化性能,这主要归因于WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4的协同作用.其中15% WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4的光催化活性最高,在4 min内几乎将30 mL 20 mol/L的次甲基蓝完全降解.并且,复合材料的稳定性也得到很大提升.经过5次循环反应后,15% WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4的降解效率仍可以维持在88.2%.相比之下,纯Ag3PO4的降解效率仅为20.2%.这表明添加WO3(H2O)0.333可以显著提高Ag3PO4的耐光腐蚀性.最后,我们详细研究了Z-机制机理.在可见光照射下,Ag3PO4和WO3(H2O)0.333的表面产生电子-空穴对.WO3(H2O)0.333的光生电子首先转移到其导带,然后迁移到Ag3PO4的价带中与空穴结合.因此,Ag3PO4的光生电子和空穴被有效分离,光生电子连续转移到Ag3PO4的导带界面.这样,Ag3PO4的导带界面上积累了大量的电子,并且在WO3(H2O)0.333的价带界面中积累了大量的空穴.在空穴的作用下,-OH与h+反应生成·OH,·OH与污染物甲基蓝反应生成CO2和H2O.同时,大量的H+和O2与电子反应,在Ag3PO4的导带界面处产生H2O2.之后,H2O2与电子反应产生·OH,·OH与甲基蓝反应形成CO2和H2O.这样,光生电子和空穴连续分离,大大提高了光催化反应速度,最终催化剂的光催化活性得到极大的提高.
关键词光催化    Ag3PO4    WO3(H2O)0.333    复合材料    Z-机制    

1 Introduction

Photocatalytic technology is widely considered to be one of the most effective ways to manage pollution [1-5]. For many years, researchers have been looking for efficient photocatalysts. Many photocatalysts have been found, such as TiO2 [6, 7], CeO2 [8, 9], BiOX (X = Br, Cl, I) [10, 11], BiPO4 [12, 13] and ZnO [14, 15]. These photocatalysts have many advantages, such as high efficiency, low harm and low price [16, 17]. However, these photocatalysts can only absorb light in the ultraviolet (UV) region because of their relatively large band gap. To achieve high-efficiency photocatalysis, the use of semiconductors that are capable of absorbing a broad spectrum of solar light is desirable [18, 19]. Recently, various photocatalysts with visible light response have been developed, such as Ag3PO4 [20, 21], Bi2MoO6 [22, 23], SnNb2O6 [24, 25], g-C3N4 [26-28], BiVO4 [29-31], CdSe [32, 33] and CdS [34, 35]. These semiconductor photocatalysts have excellent photocatalytic activity in the visible light region. For example, Wang et al. [36] successfully prepared Ag3PO4 as a highly recyclable photocatalyst. Ying et al. [37] fabricated hierarchical Bi2MoO6 nanosheet-built frameworks with excellent photocatalytic properties. Jiang et al. [38] synthesized BiOCl single-crystalline nanosheets with facet-dependent photoreactivity.

Among these semiconducting materials, Ag3PO4 has attracted considerable attention because of its excellent photocatalytic activity [39-41]. Its efficiency is highly sought after by researchers. However, the photocatalytic performance of Ag3PO4 decreased significantly after several cycles, because the photo-generated electrons and holes are likely to recombine rapidly [42]. The instability of Ag3PO4 largely limits its practical application [43, 44]. Therefore, it is very urgent and essential to design some novel composite photocatalysts to inhibit the recombination of electron–hole pairs [45-47].

Z-scheme composites have many advantages in improving the photocatalytic activity [48, 49]. For example, Zhang et al. [50] found that the Z-scheme Bi12GeO20/g-C3N4 composite photocatalyst could efficiently degrade organic pollutants. Tang et al. [51] demonstrated Z-scheme C3N4-based systems for pure water splitting. The Z-scheme composite photocatalysts can combine the advantages of different photocatalysis and overcome the shortcomings of a single photocatalyst. In fact, besides the spatial separation of redox reactions, the other important advantage over single-catalyst systems is that Z-scheme systems replace a wide band gap photocatalyst by two narrow ones, thus harvesting more photons from light. Consequently Z-scheme systems have a theoretically higher efficiency than single-catalyst systems [52, 53]. In this way, the redox reactions take place separately, which can effectively prevent the recombination of electrons and holes [54, 55], so the performance of the composite photocatalyst is greatly improved. Moreover, the Z-scheme composites can give full play to the redox ability of single photocatalyst and further enhance the photocatalytic activity [56, 57]. Nevertheless, after comprehensive consideration of many factors, such as the band gap and band alignment, finding the right semiconductor is still a formidable challenge.

WO3(H2O)0.333 is a kind of semiconductor materials with a visible light responsive band gap (2.78 eV), which is similar to WO3 and has been widely applied in fields of photocatalysis, and the band gap is matched with Ag3PO4. Compared to previously reported [58], the traditional form of WO3 is lumpy or rod like with the size of 200–300 nm. WO3(H2O)0.333 shows a linear shape, its size is about 50 nm, and it can be fully combined by Ag3PO4. WO3(H2O)0.333 was successfully fabricated by a simple microwave hydrothermal method followed by annealing. Herein, we successfully prepared WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites by in-situ synthesis. The constituent elements of the photocatalysts are characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The morphology of photocatalyst was observed by SEM. The absorption light spectrum was determined by UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS). From the photoluminescence (PL) measurements, we know that the separation efficiency of the WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composite is the highest. This indicates that the composites can largely reduce the recombination rates of electrons and holes. Through the degradation of methylene blue (MB), it is confirmed that the photocatalytic activity of WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 was much higher than that of pure WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4. In addition, after repeated testing, the 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 almost completely degraded organic pollutants in 4 min under visible light irradiation. After five cycles, the degradation ability of the composites has almost no decay, suggesting it has good stability. This work may provide the possibility of efficient and stable decomposition of organic pollutants in a practical environment.

2 Experimental
2.1 Materials

Silver nitrate (AgNO3), ammonium hydroxide (NH3·H2O), dibasic sodium phosphate (Na2HPO4), nitric acid (HNO3), sodium tungstate dihydrate (Na2WO4·H2O), sodium chloride (NaCl), and hydrogen chloride (HCl) were bought from the Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (China). L-ascorbic acid, isopropanol (IPA), triethanolamine (TEOA), and MB were bought from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Corp. (China).

2.2 Preparation of the WO3(H2O)0.333

Na2WO4·H2O (0.28 g) and NaCl (0.04 g) were mixed in solution of 30 mL deionized water (DW) and stirred for 30 min. Then, HCl was added to the mixed solution to adjust pH = 2 and stirred for another 2 h. The mixture was transferred into a reaction kettle and the autoclave reacts at 453 K for 30 min in the microwave digestion apparatus and then cooled to room temperature and then washed with DW repeatedly. The product was finally obtained by centrifugation and dried in a freeze dryer for 12 h to obtain the WO3(H2O)0.333 nanowires.

2.3 Preparation of WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites

A certain amount of AgNO3 was added in 20 mL DW and stirred for 10 min. Then, NH3·H2O of pH = 10 was added dropwise to the AgNO3 solution, which first became turbid and then clear. After that, a certain amount of WO3(H2O)0.333 was added and stirred for 5 min, and the mixed solution was sonicated for 10 min. Then, an appropriate amount of Na2HPO4 solution was added dropwise to the mixed solution and stirred for 10 min. Then, 1.0 mol/L HNO3 was dropped into the mixed solution until the pH of the solution was 7. The mixed solution was washed several times with 18.2 MΩ DW, and the washed precipitation was frozen in a refrigerator for several hours. Finally, the precipitation was placed in the freeze dryer for 12 h, and the WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 complex was obtained. The preparation process of the WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram for the synthesis of WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites
2.4 Characterization

XRD patterns of WO3(H2O)0.333, Ag3PO4, and WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites were recorded on a DX-2000 diffractometer with the 2θ range from 10° to 80°. SEM (FE-SEM Hitachi S5500) was implemented to examine the granularity and structure of the samples. XPS was performed on a Thermo ESCALAB 250 spectrometer. The UV-Vis DRS measurements were surveyed with a PerkinElmer Lambda 950 UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The specific surface area of the samples was measured by N2 adsorption using the multipoint Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method (ASAP 2010). The photoelectrochemical measurements were carried out on a Shanghai Chenhua CHI-660D electrochemical system. The electrolyte solution was 1.0 mol/L Na2SO4. A 0.05 g catalyst sample was mixed with 50 μL 5% nafion and 0.5 mL ethyl alcohol absolute to make slurry. The slurry was then injected onto a 1.0 cm2 ITO conductive glass electrode and these electrolytes were dried at 333 K for 30 min.

2.5 Photocatalytic activity evaluation

The photocatalyst (30 mg) was mixed with MB solution (30 mL, 20 mg/L). Light-emitting diode (LED) arrays (active power 50 W, λ = 410 nm) were used as a solar model. The irradiation time intervals were set at 2 min and the process was repeated five times. After each light irradiation, the absorbance of the MB solution was determined using the clear liquid obtained after centrifuging the mixture. The dominant reactive species affecting MB photodegradation were identified using IPA, L-ascorbic acid, and TEOA as scavengers for ·OH, ·O2−, and holes, respectively. In a typical process, either L-ascorbic acid (150 mg), IPA (20 mmol/L, 5.4 mL), or TEOA (10 mmol/L, 6.1 mL) was added to a mixture of the photocatalyst and MB solution. Radical-trapping experiments were performed using the same method as for the photodegradation experiments.

3 Results and discussion

Fig. 2 shows the XRD patterns of the samples. The strong diffraction peaks centered at 2θ = 14.17°, 18.18°, 23.05°, 24.28°, 27.12°, 28.23°, 33.72°, 36.68°, 50.25°, and 55.68° match the (020), (111), (002), (200), (022), (220), (202), (222), (260), and (224) crystal planes of cubic WO3(H2O)0.333 (PDF No. 87-1203), respectively. The strong diffraction peaks located at 2θ = 20.99°, 29.82°, 33.46°, 36.73°, 47.96°, 52.84°, 55.18°, and 57.47° are assigned to the (110), (200), (210), (211), (310), (222), (320), and (321) crystal planes of orthorhombic Ag3PO4 (PDF No. 84-0510), respectively. All strong diffraction peaks in 5%, 15% and 25%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 corresponded to Ag3PO4, indicating that Ag3PO4 is present in the composites. There is no peak relative to WO3(H2O)0.333 in 5%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4, and the WO3(H2O)0.333 content may be too small to be detected. The XRD pattern of 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 shows that a small peak corresponds to the (220) crystal face of WO3(H2O)0.333, suggesting that the composite contains WO3(H2O)0.333. The XRD pattern of 25%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 shows two small peaks corresponding to the WO3(H2O)0.333 (002) and (220) planes, indicating that the composite contains WO3(H2O)0.333.

Fig. 2. XRD patterns of WO3(H2O)0.333, WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites, and Ag3PO4

As shown in Fig. 3a, WO3(H2O)0.333 presents a linear shape with the size of about 50 nm. In Fig. 3b, Ag3PO4 exhibits a cubic shape with the size of about 1 μm. The WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composite retains the shape of Ag3PO4, and a small amount of WO3(H2O)0.333 is deposited on Ag3PO4. Fig. 3d3f show that all the elements in WO3(H2O)0.333, Ag3PO4, and the WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites can be detected. The origin of the C element can be ascribed to the conductive adhesive material, and no other impurities were observed, indicating that the samples are pure. The elemental mapping shows homogeneous distribution of Ag, P, O, and W in the as-prepared WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites (Fig. 3g).

Fig. 3. SEM images of (a) WO3(H2O)0.333, (b) Ag3PO4, and (c) 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4, EDS spectra of (d) WO3(H2O)0.333, (e) Ag3PO4, and (f) 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4, and (g) SEM image with corresponding elemental mapping images for 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4

XPS was used to study the elemental composition and chemical state of each catalyst. From Fig. 4a, it can be seen that the 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composite contains all elements of pure WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4, which is consistent with the EDS results in Fig. 3. Fig. 4b shows the binding energy of O 1s in WO3(H2O)0.333, with 532.92 and 530.63 eV corresponding to hydroxyl oxygen and lattice oxygen [47, 59], respectively. The hydroxyl oxygen and lattice oxygen in Ag3PO4 are 532.54 and 530.80 eV, respectively. The hydroxyl oxygen and lattice oxygen of 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 are 532.25 and 530.86 eV, which are between WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4, indicating that the composites contain WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4. In Fig. 4c, the binding energies of W 4f5/2 and W 5f7/2 in WO3(H2O)0.333 correspond to 37.92 and 35.83 eV [60, 61], respectively. In 15% WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4, the binding energies of W 4f5/2 and W 5f7/2 are 38.29 and 36.21 eV [62, 63], respectively. Compared to WO3(H2O)0.333, the peak value of W 4f in 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 shifts 0.38 eV to a high position. This may be due to the fact that the reconstitution of atoms between WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4 has resulted in mutual interaction in the process of combination with each other. It is further explained that WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4 are composited rather than simply mixed. In Fig. 4d, the binding energies of Ag 3d3/2 and Ag 3d5/2 of Ag3PO4 are 374.17 and 368.16 eV [64, 65], respectively. The binding energies of Ag 3d3/2 and Ag 3d5/2 in 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 are 374.20 and 368.18 eV, respectively, and there is almost no change in binding energy with respect to WO3(H2O)0.333. In Fig. 4e, the P 2p binding energies of Ag3PO4 and 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 are 133.03 and 133.13 eV, respectively.

Fig. 4. (a) All XPS scanned spectra of WO3(H2O)0.333, Ag3PO4, and 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4, and high-resolution XPS of (b) O 1s, (c) W 4f, (d) Ag 3d, and (e) P 2p

Fig. 5 shows the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and the BET surface area of different samples. The SBET values of Ag3PO4 and WO3(H2O)0.333 are 0.63 and 16.71 m2 g–1, respectively. When Ag3PO4 and WO3(H2O)0.333 were composited, the SBET of WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites grows with increasing content of WO3(H2O)0.333.

Fig. 5. (a) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and (b) SBET for WO3(H2O)0.333, Ag3PO4 and WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites

Fig. 6a shows UV-Vis DR spectra of WO3(H2O)0.333, Ag3PO4, and the WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites. WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4 have absorption edges at 473 and 540 nm, respectively. The absorption edge of the WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites is 553 nm. There is a significant blue shift in the absorption edge in the composites, and the blue shift increases with the increase of WO3(H2O)0.333 ratios. Therefore, the WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites exhibit better capture of visible light than WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4, which can be ascribed to the synergistic reaction of WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4. This result indicates that the composites have a potential application in visible light photocatalysis. In Fig. 6b, the energy band gaps (Eg) of WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4 are 2.78 and 2.38 eV, respectively. Eg is calculated as follows [66]:

Fig. 6. (a) UV-Vis DR spectra of WO3(H2O)0.333, Ag3PO4, and WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites; (b) Linear transformation hv-(αhv)2 curves for UV-Vis DRS spectra
(1)

where α and hv represent the absorbance and energy of radiation, respectively. Valence band (VB) energy (EVB) and conduction band (CB) energy (ECB) of photocatalyst are determined using the following formula [67]:

(2)
(3)

where X is the electronegativity of semiconductor, and the X values of WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4 are 6.49 and 5.96 eV, respectively. Ec is 4.5 eV. Therefore, EVB of WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4 is 3.38 and 2.65 eV, respectively, and ECB of WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4 is 0.6 and 0.27 eV, respectively.

In order to further explore the separation efficiency of photogenerated electrons and holes, the transient photocurrent-time curves of different photocatalysts are measured. As shown in Fig. 7, the photocurrent densities of WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites are higher than that of pure WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4. Among them, 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 has the highest photocurrent density. This result indicates that addition of 15%WO3(H2O)0.333 can greatly enhance the separation efficiency of photogenerated electrons and holes in Ag3PO4. This result further suggests that the heterojunction formed between WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4 is the key to promote the separation of photogenerated electrons and holes.

Fig. 7. Photocurrent-time curves of WO3(H2O)0.333, Ag3PO4, and WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites

The photocatalytic activity of the photocatalysts was evaluated by the degradation of MB solution. As shown in Fig. 8a, we first added various photocatalysts into the MB solution and stirred it under dark conditions, and tested every 60 min. After three tests, the pollutants were hardly degraded. However, under visible light, the degradation ability of the composites is significantly enhanced relative to pure WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4. The photocatalytic ability of 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 was much higher than that of pure WO3(H2O)0.333, Ag3PO4, and a physical mixture of 15%WO3(H2O)0.333 + 85%Ag3PO4. The MB solution was almost completely degraded in 4 min. Fig. 8b shows that there is a linear relationship between LnC0/C and t, and the photodegradation reaction conforms to the pseudo-first-order kinetic equation. The equation is shown as follows:

(4)
Fig. 8. (a) MB degradation curves under dark and visible light irradiation, (b) Linear transform of MB degradation curves, (c) The apparent pseudo-first-order rate constant kapp with different catalysts

where C0 is the absorbance of the initial MB solution, C is the absorbance of the dye solution after t min light irradiation time, and kapp is a rate constant of pseudo-first-order. According to Eq. (4) and Fig. 8b, the Fig. 8c shows the kapp constants of different photocatalysts. The kapp of 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 is 0.969 min−1, which is 161.5 and 2.9 times higher than that of WO3(H2O)0.333 (0.006 min−1) and Ag3PO4 (0.329 min−1), respectively.

The stability of a catalyst determines whether it can be applied in practice. In order to further study the stability of the 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composite, five cycle experiments on composites and pure Ag3PO4 were carried out under the same conditions. As shown in Fig. 9, the degradation efficiency of the composites can still retain 88.2% after five cycles, but the degradation efficiency of pure Ag3PO4 is only 20.2% after five cycles. This result indicates that the addition of WO3(H2O)0.333 greatly enhances the stability of Ag3PO4. The higher stability enables 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 have a wide range of practical applications.

Fig. 9. Five cycles of photocatalytic test for 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 and Ag3PO4

Fig. 10 shows the Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism. From Fig. 6, we know that the CB and VB values of WO3(H2O)0.333 are 0.6 and 3.38 eV, respectively. Ag3PO4 has CB and VB values of 0.27 and 2.65 eV, respectively. Under the visible light irradiation, electron-hole pairs are generated on the surfaces of Ag3PO4 and WO3(H2O)0.333. The photogenerated electrons of WO3(H2O)0.333 first transfer to the CB of WO3(H2O)0.333 and then migrate to the VB of Ag3PO4 to combine with holes. Therefore, the photo-induced electrons and holes of Ag3PO4 are separated effectively, and the photoelectrons are continuously transferred to the CB interface of Ag3PO4. In this way, a large amount of electrons are accumulated on the CB interface of Ag3PO4, and a large number of holes are accumulated in the VB interface of WO3(H2O)0.333. Under the action of holes, –OH reacts with h+ to produce ·OH, and ·OH reacts with contaminants to form CO2 and H2O. Meantime, a great deal of H+ and O2 react with electrons to generate H2O2 at the conduction band interface of Ag3PO4. After that, H2O2 reacts with electrons to generate ·OH, and ·OH reacts with MB to form CO2 and H2O [59, 68]. In this way, the photogenerated electrons and holes are separated continuously, which largely increases photocatalytic reaction rate speed [69], and finally the photocatalytic activity of the catalyst is greatly improved.

Fig. 10. The photocatalytic mechanism of WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composites under visible light
4 Conclusions

We have successfully prepared a novel Z-scheme WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composite photocatalysts, which exhibits excellent photocatalytic activity and good stability under visible light irradiation. The 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composite has the best ability to degrade pollutants and can almost completely degrade methylene blue within 4 min, which is 161.5 and 2.9 times higher than that of WO3(H2O)0.333 and Ag3PO4, respectively. Moreover, after five cycles, the photodegradation ability of the 15%WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composite hardly changed. Therefore, is novel WO3(H2O)0.333/Ag3PO4 composite might provide an effective and feasible route for environmental pollution control.

References
[1]
S. Cao, F. Tao, Y. Tang, Y. Li, J. Yu, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2016, 45, 4747-4765. DOI:10.1039/C6CS00094K
[2]
J. Fu, B. Zhu, W. You, M. Jaroniec, J. Yu, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 220, 148-160. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.034
[3]
K. Dai, L. Lu, C. Liang, Q. Liu, G. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 156-157, 331-340.
[4]
J. Kou, C. Lu, J. Wang, Y. Chen, Z. Xu, R. S. Varma, Chem. Rev., 2017, 117, 1445-1514. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00396
[5]
J. Schneider, M. Matsuoka, M. Takeuchi, J. Zhang, Y. Horiuchi, M. Anpo, D. W. Bahnemann, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 9919-9986. DOI:10.1021/cr5001892
[6]
T. Zhang, J. Low, K. Koh, J. Yu, T. Asefa, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 531-540. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02827
[7]
T. Di, J. Zhang, B. Cheng, J. Yu, J. Xu, Sci. China Chem., 2018, 61, 344-350. DOI:10.1007/s11426-017-9174-9
[8]
Z. Li, J. Zhang, J. Lv, L. Lu, C. Liang, K. Dai, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 758, 162-170. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.05.115
[9]
Z. Yan, Z. Xu, J. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 199, 458-465. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.06.052
[10]
J. Zhang, J. Lv, K. Dai, C. Liang, Q. Liu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 430, 639-646. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.101
[11]
Y. Sun, X. Xiao, X. Dong, F. Dong, W. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 217-226. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62753-0
[12]
K. Ding, D. Yu, W. Wang, P. Gao, B. Liu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 445, 39-49. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.131
[13]
Y. Yan, T. Ni, J. Du, L. Li, S. Fu, K. Li, J. Zhou, Dalton Trans., 2018, 47, 6089-6101. DOI:10.1039/C8DT00408K
[14]
K. Qi, B. Cheng, J. Yu, W. Ho, J. Alloys Compd., 2017, 727, 792-820. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.142
[15]
K. Dai, J. Lv, L. Lu, Q. Liu, G. Zhu, D. Li, Mater. Lett., 2014, 130, 5-8. DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2014.04.190
[16]
F. Xu, J. Zhang, B. Zhu, J. Yu, J. Xu, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 230, 194-202. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.02.042
[17]
H. Zhao, Y. Dong, P. Jiang, G. Wang, H. Miao, R. Wu, L. Kong, J. Zhang, C. Zhang, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2015, 3, 969-977. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00102
[18]
T. Tong, B. Zhu, C. Jiang, B. Cheng, J. Yu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 433, 1175-1183. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.120
[19]
Y. Duan, S. Song, B. Cheng, J. Yu, C. Jiang, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 199-206. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(16)62551-2
[20]
Z. Wang, T. Hu, K. Dai, J. Zhang, C. Liang, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 2021-2029. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62942-5
[21]
J. Guo, S. Ouyang, P. Li, Y. Zhang, T. Kako, J. Ye, Appl. Catal. B, 2013, 134-135, 286-292.
[22]
J. Lv, J. Zhang, J. Liu, Z. Li, K. Dai, C. Liang, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 696-706. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03032
[23]
F. Opoku, K. K. Govender, C. G. C. E. van Sittert, P. P. Govendera, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 427, 487-498. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.019
[24]
C. Zhou, Y. F. Zhao, L. Shang, R. Shi, L. Z. Wu, C. H. Tung, T. R. Zhang, Chem. Commun., 2016, 52, 8239-8242. DOI:10.1039/C6CC03739A
[25]
X. Ma, W. Ma, D. Jiang, D. Li, S. Meng, M. Chen, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2017, 506, 93-101. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2017.07.017
[26]
B. Zhu, L. Zhang, B. Cheng, J. Yu, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 224, 983-999. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.11.025
[27]
J. Lv, K. Dai, J. Zhang, L. Geng, C. Liang, Q. Liu, G. Zhu, C. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 358, 377-384. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.06.183
[28]
Y. Wang, F. Silveri, M. K. Bayazit, Q. Ruan, Y. Li, J. Xie, C. R. A. Catlow, J. Tang, Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8, 1801084. DOI:10.1002/aenm.v8.24
[29]
X. Wang, D. Liao, H. Yu, J. Yu, Dalton Trans., 2018, 47, 6370-6377. DOI:10.1039/C8DT00780B
[30]
Z. Wang, J. Lv, J. Zhang, K. Dai, C. Liang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 430, 595-602. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.093
[31]
T. Wei, Y.-N. Zhu, Z. Gu, X. An, L.-m. Liu, Y. Wu, H. Liu, J. Tang, J. Qu, Nano Energy, 2018, 51, 764-773. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.018
[32]
R. Shi, Y. H. Cao, Y. J. Bao, Y. F. Zhao, G. I. N. Waterhouse, Z. Y. Fang, L. Z. Wu, C. H. Tung, Y. D. Yin, T. R. Zhang, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1700803. DOI:10.1002/adma.v29.27
[33]
H. Cho, W. D. Kim, Lee K., Lee S., G.-S. Kang, H.-L. Joh, C. Lee D., Appl. Surface Sci., 2018, 429, 2-8. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.137
[34]
J. Lv, J. Liu, J. Zhang, K. Dai, C. Liang, Z. Wang, G. Zhu, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 2018, 512, 77-85. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2017.10.052
[35]
K. Dai, J. Lv, J. Zhang, G. Zhu, L. Geng, C. Liang, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 12817-12826. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02064
[36]
H. Wang, Y. Bai, J. Yang, X. Lang, J. Li, L. Guo, Chem. Eur. J., 2012, 18, 5524-5529. DOI:10.1002/chem.v18.18
[37]
Y. Ma, Y. Jia, Z. Jiao, M. Yang, Y. Qi, Y. Bi, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 6655-6658. DOI:10.1039/C5CC00634A
[38]
J. Jiang, K. Zhao, X. Xiao, L. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 4473-4476. DOI:10.1021/ja210484t
[39]
R. Qu, W. Zhang, N. Liu, Q. Zhang, Y. Liu, X. Li, Y. Wei, L. Feng, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 8019-8028. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01469
[40]
Z. Wang, X. Xu, Z. Si, L. Liu, Y. Liu, Y. He, R. Ran, D. Weng, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 450, 441-450. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.149
[41]
D. J. Martin, N. Umezaw, X. Chen, J. Ye, J. Tang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 3380-3386. DOI:10.1039/c3ee42260g
[42]
D. J. Martin, G. G. Liu, S. J. A. Moniz, Y. P. Bi, A. M. Beale, J. H. Ye, J. W. Tang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 7808-7828. DOI:10.1039/C5CS00380F
[43]
S. Song, A. Meng, S. Jiang, B. Cheng, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 442, 224-231. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.102
[44]
M. Xie, T. Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 436, 90-101. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.234
[45]
J. Fu, C. Bie, B. Cheng, C. Jiang, J. Yu, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 2767-2779. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04461
[46]
J. Low, B. Cheng, J. Yu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 392, 658-686. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.093
[47]
R. Guo, X. Xia, X. Zhang, B. Li, H. Zhang, X. Cheng, M. Xie, Q. Cheng, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2018, 200, 44-50. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2018.02.024
[48]
Q. Xu, L. Zhang, J. Yu, S. Wageh, A. A. Al-Ghamdi, M. Jaroniec, Mater. Today, 2018, 21, 1042-1063. DOI:10.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.008
[49]
K. Qi, B. Cheng, J. Yu, W. Ho, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 1936-1955. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62962-0
[50]
Z. Wan, G. Zhang, X. Wu, S. Yin, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 207, 17-26. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.014
[51]
D. J. Martin, P. J. Reardon, S. J. Moniz, J. Tang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 12568-12571. DOI:10.1021/ja506386e
[52]
L. Cui, X. Ding, Y. Wang, H. Shi, L. Huang, Y. Zuo, S. Kang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 391, 202-210. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.055
[53]
Y. Wang, H. Suzuki, J. Xie, O. Tomita, D. J. Martin, M. Higashi, D. Kong, R. Abe, J. Tang, Chem. Rev., 2018, 118, 5201-5241. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00286
[54]
N. Nie, L. Zhang, J. Fu, B. Cheng, J. Yu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 441, 12-22. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.193
[55]
X. Li, H. Hu, L. Xu, C. Cui, D. Qian, S. Li, W. Zhu, P. Wang, P. Lin, J. Pan, C. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 441, 61-68. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.216
[56]
J. Fu, J. Yu, C. Jiang, B. Cheng, Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8, 1701503. DOI:10.1002/aenm.v8.3
[57]
X. Li, J. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2016, 45, 2603-2636. DOI:10.1039/C5CS00838G
[58]
J. Lu, Y. Wang, F. Liu, L. Zhang, S. Chai, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 393, 180-190. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.10.003
[59]
K. Dai, G. Dawson, S. Yang, Z. Chen, L. Lu, Chem. Eng. J., 2012, 191, 571-578. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2012.03.008
[60]
T. Hu, P. Li, J. Zhang, C. Liang, K. Dai, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 442, 20-29. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.146
[61]
L. Jiang, X. Yuan, G. Zeng, J. Liang, X. Chen, H. Yu, H. Wang, Z. Wu, J. Zhang, T. Xiong, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 227, 376-385. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.042
[62]
S. Feng, A. Nagao, T. Aihara, H. Miura, T. Shishido, Catal. Today, 2018, 303, 207-212. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2017.08.058
[63]
A. K. L. Sajjad, S. Sajjad, A. Iqbal, N.-u.-A. Ryma, Ceram. Int., 2018, 44, 9364-9371. DOI:10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.02.150
[64]
L. Tian, X. Xian, X. Cui, H. Tang, X. Yang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 430, 301-308. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.185
[65]
M. You, J. Pan, C. Chi, B. Wang, W. Zhao, C. Song, Y. Zheng, C. Li, J. Mater. Sci., 2018, 53, 1978-1986. DOI:10.1007/s10853-017-1612-6
[66]
C. M. Butler, A. Q. Howard, R. D. Nevels, J. Appl. Phys., 1977, 48, 4886-4892. DOI:10.1063/1.323614
[67]
Y. Huo, Z. Wang, J. Zhang, C. Liang, K. Dai, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 459, 271-280. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.005
[68]
J. Tang, Z. Zou, J. Yin, J. Ye, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2003, 382, 175-179. DOI:10.1016/j.cplett.2003.10.062
[69]
P. Xia, B. Zhu, B. Cheng, J. Yu, J. Xu, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 965-973. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03289