催化学报  2019, Vol. 40 Issue (4): 515-522   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Jian Zhang
Tingting Yan
Yusen Yang
Jialue Sun
Yanjun Lin
Min Wei
Zn-Zr-Al oxides derived from hydrotalcite precursors for ethanol conversion to diethyl carbonate
Jian Zhang, Tingting Yan, Yusen Yang, Jialue Sun, Yanjun Lin, Min Wei     
State Key Laboratory of Chemical Resource Engineering, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Soft Matter Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
* Corresponding author. Yanjun Lin, Tel: +86-10-64412131; Fax: +86-10-64425385; E-mail: linyj@mail.buct.edu.cn;
Min Wei, Tel: +86-10-64412131; Fax: +86-10-64425385; E-mail: weimin@mail.buct.edu.cn
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program (2017YFA0206804), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21871021, 21521005), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (buctylkxj01, XK1802-6)
Abstract: Ethanol conversion to high-value-added products has attracted considerable attention in both academic research and industrial fields. In this study, we synthesized a series of tunable acid-base bifunctional Zn-Zr-Al metal oxides (represented as Zn2ZrxAl-MMO) in light of the structural topotactic transformation of Zn2ZrxAl-hydrotalcite precursors (Zn2ZrxAl-LDH). The resulting Zn2ZrxAl-MMO catalysts were employed in the conversion of ethanol to diethyl carbonate. The Zr4+ ion content of the LDH precursor plays a key role in modulating the acid-base properties and determining catalytic performance:the Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO sample exhibits the optimal catalytic behavior with a diethyl carbonate (DEC) yield of 42.1%, which is the highest reported for metal oxide catalysts. Structure-property correlation investigations revealed that the synergic catalysis between medium-strong basic sites and weak acid sites plays a predominant role in the catalytic behavior. Furthermore, in situ Fourier transform infrared measurements showed that the weak acidic site promotes activation adsorption of the reactant (urea) and the intermediate product (ethyl carbamate), while the medium-strong basic site accelerates ethanol activation. Moreover, the Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO catalyst has the advantages of cost effectiveness, good stability, and reusability. Therefore, the acid-base bifunctional catalysts developed in this work can be employed as promising candidates in acid-base catalytic reactions such as ethanol conversion.
© 2019, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Hydrotalcite    Metal oxides    Acid-base catalytic reactions    Ethanol conversion    
Zn-Zr-Al氧化物催化乙醇合成碳酸二乙酯
张健, 阎婷婷, 杨宇森, 孙嘉略, 林彦军, 卫敏     
北京化工大学, 化工资源有效利用国家重点实验室, 北京软物质科学与工程高精尖创新中心, 北京 100029
摘要:乙醇作为一种重要的可再生平台化学品,其高值转化已引起研究者的广泛关注.碳酸二乙酯(DEC)是乙醇转化的重要衍生物,作为合成中间体、绿色溶剂和燃油添加剂,具有低毒、无污染的优点.目前,以乙醇为底物合成DEC主要有以下方法:光气法、氧化羰基化法、酯交换法和尿素醇解法.其中,尿素醇解法因成本低、操作简便、产物易分离等优点而备受关注,包括两个连续过程:乙醇和尿素反应生成中间体氨基甲酸乙酯(EC),EC与乙醇进一步反应生成DEC.本文采用水滑石(Zn2ZrxAl-LDH)为前体,经结构拓扑转变制备了一系列酸碱双功能金属氧化物催化剂(Zn2ZrxAl-MMO),用于催化乙醇合成DEC.通过改变LDHs前体元素比例调控氧化物的酸碱性质和催化性能,最优催化剂Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO对产物DEC产率达到42.1%,为目前报道的金属氧化物催化剂的最高产率.CO2-TPD和NH3-TPD结果表明,随着Zr含量的增加,催化剂的总碱性位点(BTOTAL)和总酸性位点(ATOTAL)浓度呈现先增加后减少的趋势,其中以Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO样品最大,表明Zr对调节Zn2ZrxAl-MMO催化剂酸碱性质起到了关键作用.研究发现,Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO催化剂样品具有最大浓度的中强碱位点(BM)和弱酸位点(AW).为了揭示构效关系,进一步研究了DEC产率与催化剂酸碱位点浓度的函数关系.结果表明,DEC产率与中强碱位点(BM)或弱酸位点(AW)的浓度呈现正相关性;而且中强碱位点和弱酸位点之间的协同作用对提升催化性能有重要贡献.与目标催化剂相比,对照样品Zn2Al-MMO表现出较高的EC产率(54.7%)和较低的DEC产率(28.3%),表明目标催化剂中的ZrO2组分能够有效活化中间产物EC,促使其进一步转化为DEC.此外,ZrO2和Al2O3均显示出较高的EC产率(68.0%和81.2%),但DEC产率(8.7%和5.3%)较低,说明目标催化剂中的ZnO组分能有效活化乙醇分子,消耗生成的中间体EC.原位红外结果证实,ZrO2提供的弱酸性位点促进了尿素和中间产物EC的活化吸附,在2207cm-1处观察到nN=C=O特征吸附峰;而乙醇在中强碱性位点(Zn2+-O2-)活化,在2973,2925,2900,1078和1052cm-1处观察到乙醇的特征吸收峰.此外,Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO催化剂表现出良好的稳定性和可重复使用性,循环使用5次后,DEC产率损失低于5%.
关键词水滑石    金属氧化物    酸碱催化反应    乙醇转化    

1 Introduction

Ethanol (EtOH) is regarded as a renewable platform chemical for the synthesis of versatile high value-added products [1-4], due to its low cost, large-scale industrial manufacture from biomass fermentation [5, 6]. Diethyl carbonate (DEC) is an important derivative of ethanol that is attracting increasing interest as a synthetic intermediate and green solvent [7], with the merits of low toxicity, negligible pollution, and low bio-accumulation. Moreover, it is an ideal substitute for the traditional fuel additive methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), due to its higher oxygen content and superior gasoline/water distribution coefficient [8]. To date, several approaches have been developed for the synthesis of DEC from ethanol: the reaction of ethanol with (a) phosgene [9], (b) urea [10-13], (c) carbon monoxide [14, 15], and (d) a dialkyl carbonate [16-18]. Among these methods, ethanolysis of urea has attracted a great deal of attention due to the advantages of cost effectiveness and facile manipulation and product separation processes [19, 20]. This reaction is comprised of two consecutive steps: the formation of intermediate ethyl carbamate (EC) from ethanol and urea, followed by reaction of EC and ethanol to produce DEC. Traditionally, organometallic compounds, metal salts, and metal oxides have been employed for ethanolysis of urea and its analogs, among which zinc oxide (ZnO) has shown a high DEC yield. It has been determined that the acid-base properties dominate the catalytic performance of ZnO [10, 21, 22], but the role of the acidic and basic sites in the ethanolysis of urea remains ambiguous. Moreover, the ZnO catalyst suffers from dissolution and transformation to the homogeneous complex Zn(NCO)2(NH3)2 during the reaction process [23]. This stimulated us to further tune the acid-base properties of ZnO-based catalysts to achieve significantly improved catalytic performance and stability.

Layered double hydroxides (LDHs) (also known as hydrotalcites), with the general formula [M1-x2+M3+x(OH)2](An-)x/n·mH2O, are a type of anionic clay with positively charged, brucite-like host layers, and exchangeable interlayer anions [24, 25]. Recently, LDH materials, as solid acid-base catalysts and catalyst supports, have received a great deal of interest in the field of heterogeneous catalysis, due to their versatile, tunable chemical compositions, structures, and architectures [26, 27]. In particular, by virtue of the so-called structural topotactic transformation process of LDH precursors, corresponding mixed metal oxide (MMO) catalysts can be obtained after calcination treatment [28], which possess tunable acid-base sites which depend on the chemical composition of, and preparation parameters from LDHs. This unique property inspired us to design and prepare MMO catalysts with tunable acid-base sites, for the purpose of attaining enhanced catalytic behavior toward the synthesis of DEC from ethanol and urea.

In this study, Zn2ZrxAl-hydrotalcite precursors (denoted as Zn2ZrxAl-LDH) were synthesized using a co-precipitation method. Subsequently, a series of Zn-Zr-Al mixed metal oxide (Zn2ZrxAl-MMO) catalysts were synthesized by phase topotactic transformation from LDH precursors and used in ethanol conversion to produce DEC. CO2 temperature programmed desorption (CO2-TPD) and NH3-TPD studies indicated that the Zr content significantly influences the surface acidity and basicity of the Zn2ZrxAl-MMO catalysts, and the Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO sample showed the maximal catalytic performance (DEC yield: 42.1%), which is the highest in comparison with those of previously reported metal oxide catalysts (Table S1). In addition, the Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO catalyst exhibits good stability and reusability, with a loss in DEC yield of below 5% for up to five cycles. A study of structure-property correlations was performed: in situ FTIR results confirm that the weak acid site of ZrO2 is responsible for the activation adsorption of urea and the intermediate product, while the medium-strong basic site of ZnO accelerates ethanol activation.

2 Experimental
2.1 Materials

Analytical-grade chemicals, including ZrO(NO3)2·xH2O, Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, Al(NO3)3·9H2O, Na2CO3, NaOH, ethanol, cyclohexanol, and urea were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and all reagents were used without further purification.

2.2 Preparation of ZnZrAl-LDH and ZnZrAl-MMO samples

Zn2ZrxAl-LDH precursors with Zn : Zr : Al molar ratios of 2 : 0 : 1, 2 : 0.05 : 1, 2 : 0.1 : 1, and 2 : 0.2 : 1 were prepared using a co-precipitation method, as follows. Typically, Solution A was obtained by dissolving ZrO(NO3)2·xH2O, Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, and Al(NO3)3·9H2O, with varying Zn : Zr : Al molar ratios ([Zn 2+]+[Al3+]+[Zr4+] = 0.05 mol L-1), in 100 mL of deionized water. Solution B was a mixture of NaOH (2 mol L-1) and Na2CO3 (0.3 mol L-1) in deionized water (100 mL). Solution B was added dropwise to Solution A with vigorous agitation until pH = 10 was obtained. The resulting slurry was heated at 110 ℃ for 12 h. The resulting precipitate (Zn2ZrxAl-LDH precursors) was separated, washed thoroughly with deionized water, and dried at 60 ℃ for 24 h. Finally, the Zn2ZrxAl-MMO samples were obtained via calcination of Zn2ZrxAl-LDH precursors at 500 ℃ for 4 h in air (heating rate 5 ℃ min-1).

2.3 Catalyst characterization

Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were performed on a Rigaku XRD-6000 instrument (Cu Kα radiation: λ = 0.15418 nm; 40 kV, 30 mA). The UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (UV-vis DRS) were recorded on a Hitachi UV-vis spectrophotometer (U-3900H). The morphological study was carried out on a Zeiss Supra 55 scanning electron microscope (SEM) (accelerating voltage 20 kV). High resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) observation was carried out on a JEOL JEM-3010 at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. Low-temperature N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were recorded on a Quantachrome Autosorb-1C-VP analyzer. The sample was degassed at 200 ℃ for 12 h; the multipoint Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method was used to calculate the total surface area.

The acidity and basicitiy of the catalysts were determined by using temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) of chemisorbed NH3 and CO2, carried out on a Micromeritics AutoChem Ⅱ 2920 apparatus equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). For the CO2 or NH3-TPD, 100 mg of sample was placed in a quartz tube reactor and pretreated in a helium flow (50 cm3 min-1) at a heating rate of 10 ℃ min-1 to 500 ℃, and maintained at 500 ℃ for 1 h, followed by cooling to 100 ℃. Afterwards, a flow of CO2 or NH3 was introduced into the sample for 0.5 h to obtain a saturation adsorption. Then, the catalyst was degassed in a helium flow for 1.5 h to remove physisorbed CO2 or NH3, followed by desorption measurements of NH3 or CO2 by heating from 100 to 550 ℃ at a rate of 10 ℃ min-1.

In situ Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of urea, ethanol, and intermediate (EC) adsorbed onto catalyst samples were carried out using a Thermo Nicolet 380 spectrometer. Two types of measurements were performed, as follows. For urea or EC adsorption, the catalyst (20 mg) and urea (or EC 2 mg) were mixed thoroughly and pressed into a wafer. In the case of ethanol adsorption, the catalyst sample (20 mg) was pressed to obtain a wafer, which was then installed in the IR cell. Afterwards, ethanol was introduced into the cell for signal recording in the temperature range 30-200 ℃.

2.4 Catalyst evaluation

Catalytic reactions were performed using a 50-mL stainless-steel autoclave equipped with a magnetic stirrer. Typically, 0.08 g of catalyst, 0.8 g of urea, and 9.2 g of ethanol were placed in the reactor, which was purged three times with N2, and then sealed. The reaction was triggered by heating the autoclave to a targeted temperature. The resulting product mixture was identified using off-line gas chromatography (Shimadzu GC-2014C, flame ionization detector). All detected products were quantitatively analyzed by the internal standard method using cyclohexanol as the internal standard.

A recyclability study of the catalyst was performed. The used catalyst was filtered from the mixed products, washed several times with ethanol and then dried. The obtained catalyst was reused for the next reaction cycle.

The yield of DEC (or EC) was determined by the following formula:

(1)

where M stands for the cumulative mole number for DEC (or EC).

3 Results and discussion
3.1 Structure and morphology studies

The catalyst precursors, Zn2ZrxAl-LDH with varying Zr contents, were prepared via a facile co-precipitation method. Their XRD patterns (Fig. 1 (A)) display a series of reflections at 2θ values of 12°, 24°, 34.9°, 39°, 61°, and 62°, which were indexed to the (003), (006), (009), (015), (110), and (113) reflection planes of an LDH phase. No other crystalline phase was detected, implying high purity of the LDH precursors. However, as the Zr content increased, the crystallinity of Zn2ZrxAl-LDH decreased, indicated by weakened reflection intensity, which is due to the distortion of the LDH host caused by the introduction of the Zr4+ cation into the brucite-like layers. Fig. 1 (B) illustrates XRD patterns of the as-obtained Zn2ZrxAl-MMO samples after calcination treatment of the LDH precursors at 500 ℃. In all cases, LDH samples undergo a structural topotactic transformation process, resulting in the disappearance of the characteristic reflections of the LDH; while a series of reflections at 2θ values of 31.6°, 34.2°, 36°, 47.3°, 56.5°, 62.6°, and 67.8° are observed, corresponding to the ZnO phase (PDF#36-1451). No zirconium oxide or alumina oxide phase was detected, suggesting an amorphous phase.

Fig. 1. (A) XRD patterns of ZnAl-LDH (a), Zn2Zr0.05Al-LDH (b), Zn2Zr0.1Al-LDH (c), and Zn2Zr0.2Al-LDH (d); (B) XRD patterns of ZnAl-MMO (a), Zn2Zr0.05Al-MMO (b), Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO (c), and Zn2Zr0.2Al-MMO (d).

UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (Fig. 2) was employed to study the structure of the Zn2ZrxAl-MMO samples. All the samples showed an absorption peak at 375 nm, which is ascribed to the ZnO phase resulting from the transition of O (2p)-Zn (4s-p) [29]. A weak band at ~270 nm was observed in the three samples incorporating Zr and is attributed to ZrO2 nanoparticles [30]. It should be noted that with the increase in Zr content, the band intensity at ~270 nm gradually increased, indicating the presence of ZrO2 in the Zn2ZrxAl-MMO (x = 0.05, 0.1, 0.2) samples.

Fig. 2. Diffuse reflectance UV-vis spectra of ZnAl-MMO (a), Zn2Zr0.05Al-MMO (b), Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO (c), and Zn2Zr0.2Al-MMO (d) samples.

SEM images of the Zn2ZrxAl-LDH precursors show a uniform nanoplate-like shape with a lateral diameter distribution of 180-200 nm; the Zn2ZrxAl-MMO samples inherit the original plate-like morphology of LDHs without an obvious change in particle size (Fig. S1). As a typical example, TEM images of Zn2Zr0.1Al-LDH and Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO display sheet-like shapes with particle sizes of 180-200 nm (Fig. 3 (A) and 3 (B)). A lattice fringe with a spacing of 0.247 nm was observed for the Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO sample, which corresponds to the (101) reflection plane of the ZnO phase (Fig. 3 (C)). No Al2O3 reflections were observed, indicating an amorphous phase. Moreover, we did not observe the lattice fringe of ZrO2, possibly due to its low content and poor crystallinity. The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms (Table 1) of the Zn2ZrxAl-MMO samples indicated comparable specific surface areas, average pore sizes, and total pore volumes.

Fig. 3. TEM images of Zn2Zr0.1Al-LDH (A) and Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO (B); (C) HRTEM image of Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO sample.
Table 1
Physicochemical parameters and catalytic performances of Zn2ZrxAl-MMO samples toward DEC synthesis from ethanol.
3.2 Catalyst evaluation and structure-property correlation studies

The conversion of ethanol with urea to produce DEC occurs in two consecutive steps: formation of the intermediate product EC, followed by reaction of EC with ethanol to produce DEC [31]. We studied the influence of the Zn/Al ratio on catalytic performance, and the results showed that the optimal catalytic behavior was obtained with Zn/Al = 2. Catalytic evaluations of the Zn2ZrxAl-MMO samples for ethanol conversion to DEC were performed (Fig. 4 (A), Tables 1 and S3). It was observed that the Zn2Al-MMO catalyst showed the lowest yield of DEC (28.3%) among the catalysts. As the Zr content increased, the DEC yield first increased and then declined, and the Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO catalyst exhibited the maximum yield of DEC (42.1%). This is, to the best of our knowledge, the highest value reported for metal oxide catalysts (Table S1) [10, 13, 21, 31, 32]. Furthermore, the recyclability and stability of the Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO catalyst were also studied (Fig. 4 (B)). The DEC yield showed a slight decrease of ~2% after five reaction cycles. In addition, the XRD pattern of the used catalyst (Fig. 4 (C)) displayed no significant variation from that of the fresh catalyst. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms (Table S2) indicate an ~16% decrease in specific surface area after five reaction cycles, demonstrating satisfactory reusability.

Fig. 4. (A) Catalytic performance of the catalysts; (B) Catalytic performance of Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO in five consecutive cycles; (C) XRD patterns of fresh (a) and used (b) Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO catalyst.

It has been reported that the acid-base properties of the catalyst are crucial for alcohol conversion [34, 36]. Herein, CO2-TPD and NH3-TPD measurements were performed (Fig. 5 and Table 2) in order to determine the concentration of the acidic and basic sites and the strength of the acid-base properties of the Zn2ZrxAl-MMO catalysts. In the CO2-TPD curves, all four samples display a broad CO2 desorption peak between 100 and 400 ℃, which were deconvoluted into three contributions with maximum temperatures (TM) in the ranges of 120-140 ℃ (weak base site), 180-200 ℃ (medium-strong base site) and 260-280 ℃ (strong base site) using a Gaussian peak fitting method [35-37]. The basic sites originate from OH groups (weak), M+-O2- pairs (medium), and isolated O2- ions (strong), respectively. In the case of the NH3-TPD measurements, the NH3 desorption peak in the range of 100-450 ℃ was fitted to three peaks with TM in the region of 140-160 ℃ (weak acid site), 220-240 ℃ (medium-strong acid site), and 320-360 ℃ (strong acid site), respectively. The acid sites were derived from the contributions of a variety of metal oxides, such as Al2O3 and ZnO. It should be noted that both the total basic site concentration (BTOTAL) and total acid site concentration (ATOTAL) increased gradually from Zn2Al-MMO to Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO, and then decreased in Zn2Zr0.2Al-MMO, indicating the Zr content plays a key role in tuning the acid-base properties of the Zn2ZrxAl-MMO catalysts. With an increase in Zr content, the concentration of the medium-strong base sites (BM) and the weak acid sites (AW) increased significantly and reached a maximum in the Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO catalyst. Moreover, we studied the DEC yield as a function of unique structure concentration, and the results showed a positive correlation between DEC yield and BM and AW (Fig. 5); however, this is not observed for other types of base or acid sites. These results imply that both medium-strong base and weak acid sites contribute to catalytic performance in the synthesis of DEC from ethanol and urea. The used Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO was characterized by CO2-TPD and NH3-TPD, and the ratio of desorption peaks did not show an obvious change (Fig. S2).

Fig. 5. CO2-TPD (A) and NH3-TPD (B) profiles of ZnAl-MMO (a), Zn2Zr0.05Al-MMO (b), Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO (c), and Zn2Zr0.2Al-MMO (d). DEC yield as a function of the concentration of medium-strong base sites (C) and weak acid sites (D) over ZnAl-MMO (a), Zn2Zr0.05Al-MMO (b), Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO (c), and Zn2Zr0.2Al-MMO (d).
Table 2
Base and acid site concentrations for the Zn2ZrxAl-MMO samples.

We prepared a control sample (Zn2Al-MMO) for a comparison study. It was found that the Zn2Al-MMO sample produced the highest yield of EC (54.7%) and the lowest yield of DEC (28.3%) among all the catalysts (Table 1), indicating that the intermediate EC is not effectively activated and converted into DEC in the absence of ZrO2. Moreover, both ZrO2 and Al2O3 show high yields of EC (68.0% and 81.2%) but low yields of DEC (8.7% and 5.3%), as shown in Table S1. This indicates that the ethanol molecule does not undergo effective activation so as to react with EC in the absence of ZnO. We identified weak acid sites on the surface of ZrO2 and medium-strong basic sites on ZnO based on the structure-property correlations in this work, as well as in previous studies. Based on the in situ FTIR absorption spectra of control samples, it is proposed that urea and intermediate EC are activated by weak acid sites (ZrO2); whereas ethanol is activated by medium-strong basic sites (Zn2+-O2-).

Furthermore, in situ FTIR absorption spectroscopy was employed to study the role of the acid sites of Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO (Fig. 6 (A)), in which urea and intermediate EC were used as basic species to probe the acid sites. For the adsorption of urea on the Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO sample, at room temperature, multiple bands were observed at 3456, 3355, 1683, and 1152 cm-1, which were attributed to N-H, C=O, and C-N stretching vibrations, respectively [38, 39]. As the temperature increased to 130 ℃, a new band appeared at 2207 cm-1, corresponding to νN=C=O bonding to the surface of the metal oxide (O=C=N-M, M stands for metal cation) [40], which originated from the activation of urea on the acid sites of the Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO catalyst at high temperature. Additionally, the intensity of the band at 2207 cm-1 increased significantly as the temperature increased from 130 to 200 ℃, demonstrating that a higher temperature is favorable for the activation adsorption of urea. In the in situ FTIR absorption of intermediate EC on the catalyst surface (Fig. 6 (B)), a similar phenomenon was observed; the band at 2207 cm-1, due to O=C=N-M, was detected at 130 ℃ and then increased gradually between 130 and 200 ℃, as a result of the adsorption of EC. The results confirm that both urea and EC undergo activation adsorption on the acid sites of the Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO catalyst.

Fig. 6. In situ FTIR absorption spectra of urea (A) and EC (B) on the surface of the Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO catalyst in the temperature range of 30-200 ℃.

In situ FTIR absorption spectra of ethanol on the surface of Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO were carried out (Fig. 7), in which ethanol was used as an acidic species to detect basic sites. In the temperature range of 100-200 ℃, five bands, attributed to ethoxide species, were observed at 2973, 2925, 2900, 1078, and 1052 cm-1, which are assigned as follows: νas(CH3) stretching (2973 cm-1); νas(CH2) stretching (2925 cm-1); νs(CH3) stretching (2900 cm-1); monodentate ethoxide stretching ν(COmono) (1078 cm-1), and bidentate ethoxide stretching ν(CObi) (1052 cm-1) [41, 42]. The ethoxide species originated from deprotonated ethanol (dissociation adsorption) on the basic sites of the Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO catalyst. Moreover, the band intensities of ethoxide species became stronger with an increase in temperature, suggesting an enhanced activation adsorption of the ethanol molecule on the catalyst surface.

Fig. 7. In situ FTIR absorption spectra of ethanol over the Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO catalyst in the temperature range of 100-200 ℃.
4 Conclusions

In summary, ZnZrAl-MMO catalysts were synthesized by the structural topotactic transformation process of LDH precursors. The Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO catalyst exhibits the optimal catalytic performance (DEC yield 42.1%) for ethanol conversion to synthesize DEC. The CO2-TPD and NH3-TPD studies indicate that weak acid and medium-strong base sites account for the enhancement of the DEC yield. According to in situ FTIR investigations, the acid sites of the Zn2Zr0.1Al-MMO catalyst activate urea and the intermediate EC to produce O=C=N-M; while the base sites promote activation adsorption of ethanol, with the formation of ethoxide species. This study demonstrates a helpful paradigm for the control over acid-base bifunctional catalysts derived from LDH precursors, which will be of use in heterogeneous acid-base catalytic reactions.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program (2017YFA0206804), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21871021, 21521005), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (buctylkxj01, XK1802-6).

References
[1]
T. L. Jordison, C. T. Lira, D. J. Miller, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2015, 54, 10991-11000. DOI:10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02409
[2]
K. Van der Borght, V. V. Galvita, G. B. Marin, Appl. Catal. A, 2015, 504, 621-630. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2015.06.034
[3]
J. Quesada, R. Arreola-Sánchez, L. Faba, E. Díaz, V. M. Rentería-Tapia, S. Ordóñez, Appl. Catal. A, 2018, 551, 23-33. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2017.12.004
[4]
H. Chen, Y. Dai, X. Jia, H. Yu, Y. Yang, Green Chem., 2016, 18, 3048-3056. DOI:10.1039/C5GC02593A
[5]
J. Sun, Y. Wang, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 1078-1090. DOI:10.1021/cs4011343
[6]
J. Chen, J. Sun, Y. Wang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2017, 56, 4627-4637. DOI:10.1021/acs.iecr.7b00600
[7]
B. Schäffner, F. Schäffner, S. P. Verevkin, A. Börner, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 4554-4581. DOI:10.1021/cr900393d
[8]
L. Wang, H. Li, S. Xin, F. Li, Catal. Commun., 2014, 50, 49-53. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2014.02.028
[9]
E. Leino, P. Mäki-Arvela, V. Eta, D. Y. Murzin, T. Salmi, J. P. Mikkola, Appl. Catal. A, 2010, 383, 1-13. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2010.05.046
[10]
D. Wang, B. Yang, X. Zhai, L. Zhou, Fuel Process. Technol., 2007, 88, 807-812. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.04.003
[11]
P. Ball, H. Füllmann, W. Heitz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 1980, 19, 718-720. DOI:10.1002/(ISSN)1521-3773
[12]
K. Shukla, V. C. Srivastava, Catal. Rev., 2017, 59, 1-43. DOI:10.1080/01614940.2016.1263088
[13]
K. Shukla, V. C. Srivastava, Fuel Process. Technol., 2017, 161, 116-124. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.03.004
[14]
B. C. Dunn, C. Guenneau, S. A. Hilton, J. Pahnke, E. M. Eyring, J. Dworzanski, H. L. C. Meuzelaar, J. Z. Hu, M. S. Solum, R. J. Pugmire, Energy Fuels, 2002, 16, 177-181. DOI:10.1021/ef0101816
[15]
S. Huang, P. Chen, B. Yan, S. Wang, Y. Shen, X. Ma, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2013, 52, 6349-6356. DOI:10.1021/ie3032235
[16]
S. J. Wang, S. H. Cheng, P. H. Chiu, K. Huang, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2014, 53, 5982-5995. DOI:10.1021/ie402923p
[17]
C. C. Hu, P. H. Chiu, S. J. Wang, S. H. Cheng, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 2015, 60, 1487-1494. DOI:10.1021/acs.jced.5b00064
[18]
H. Iida, R. Kawaguchi, K. Okumura, Catal. Commun., 2018, 108, 7-11. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2018.01.019
[19]
K. Shukla, V. C. Srivastava, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 32624-32645. DOI:10.1039/C6RA02518H
[20]
S. Huang, B. Yan, S. Wang, X. Ma, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 3079-3116. DOI:10.1039/C4CS00374H
[21]
W. Zhao, W. Peng, D. Wang, N. Zhao, J. Li, F. Xiao, W. Wei, Y. Sun, Catal. Commun., 2009, 10, 655-658. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2008.11.018
[22]
A. Dibenedetto, A. Angelini, S. Fasciano, I. Pàpai, D. Curulla-Ferré, M. Aresta, J. CO2 Util., 2014, 8, 27-33. DOI:10.1016/j.jcou.2014.10.002
[23]
A. Dibenedetto, A. Angelini, M. Aresta, S. Fasciano, M. E. Cucciolito, F. Ruffo, B. M. Aresta, D. Curulla-Ferré, E. De Giglio, Appl. Catal. A, 2015, 493, 1-7. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2014.12.050
[24]
W. Bing, L. Zheng, S. He, D. Rao, M. Xu, L. Zheng, B. Wang, Y. Wang, M. Wei, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 656-664. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.7b03022
[25]
G. Fan, F. Li, D.G. Evans, X. Duan, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 7040-7066. DOI:10.1039/C4CS00160E
[26]
J. Pang, M. Zheng, L. He, L. Li, X. Pan, A. Wang, X. Wang, T. Zhang, J. Catal., 2016, 344, 184-193. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2016.08.024
[27]
Y. Chen, C. Li, J. Zhou, S. Zhang, D. Rao, S. He, M. Wei, D. G. Evans, X. Duan, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 5756-5765. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.5b01429
[28]
H. Chen, S. He, M. Xu, M. Wei, D. G. Evans, X. Duan, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 2735-2743. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b03494
[29]
R. Ullah, Z. Zhang, P. Bai, P. Wu, D. Han, U. J. Etim, Z. Yan, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2016, 55, 3751-3758. DOI:10.1021/acs.iecr.5b04421
[30]
Q. Pan, A. Ramanathan, W. K. Snavely, R. V. Chaudhari, B. Subramaniam, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2013, 52, 15481-15487. DOI:10.1021/ie4019484
[31]
S. Xin, L. Wang, H. Li, K. Huang, F. Li, Fuel Process. Technol., 2014, 126, 453-459. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.05.029
[32]
A. Angelini, A. Dibenedetto, D. Curullaferr, M. Aresta, RSC Adv., 2015, 5, 88401-88408. DOI:10.1039/C5RA18859H
[33]
P. Gao, F. Li, H. Zhan, N. Zhao, F. Xiao, W. Wei, L. Zhong, H. Wang, Y. Sun, J. Catal., 2013, 298, 51-60. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2012.10.030
[34]
Z. Shi, S. Zhang, X. Xiao, D. Mao, G. Lu, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6, 3457-3467. DOI:10.1039/C5CY01238D
[35]
X. Huang, C. Atay, T. I. Korányi, M. D. Boot, E. J. M. Hensen, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 7359-7370. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.5b02230
[36]
Q. Liu, B. Wang, C. Wang, Z. Tian, W. Qu, H. Ma, R. Xu, Green Chem., 2014, 16, 2604-2613. DOI:10.1039/C3GC42648C
[37]
P. Liu, M. Derchi, E. J. M. Hensen, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 144, 135-143. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.07.010
[38]
M. Aresta, A. Dibenedetto, F. Nocito, C. Ferragina, J. Catal., 2009, 268, 106-114. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2009.09.008
[39]
Y. Gao, W. Peng, N. Zhao, W. Wei, Y. Sun, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2011, 351, 29-40. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2011.09.006
[40]
F. Li, H. Li, L. Wang, P. He, Y. Cao, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, 5, 1021-1034. DOI:10.1039/C4CY01109K
[41]
C. P. Rodrigues, P. C. Zonetti, C. G. Silva, A. B. Gaspar, L. G. Appel, Appl. Catal. A, 2013, 458, 111-118. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2013.03.028
[42]
J. Llorca, N. Homs, P. R. D. L. Piscina, J. Catal., 2004, 227, 556-560. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2004.08.024