催化学报  2019, Vol. 40 Issue (4): 590-599   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Shujun Ming
Lei Pang
Chi Fan
Wen Guo
Yahao Dong
Peng Liu
Zhen Chen
Tao Li
Chemical deactivation of Cu-SAPO-18 deNOx catalyst caused by basic inorganic contaminants in diesel exhaust
Shujun Minga,†, Lei Pangb,†, Chi Fana, Wen Guoa, Yahao Donga, Peng Liua, Zhen Chena, Tao Lia     
a. Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry for Energy Conversion and Storage, Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry and Service Failure, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China;
b. DongFeng Trucks R & D Center, Wuhan 430056, Hubei, China
* Corresponding author. Zhen Chen, Tel: +86-27-87557350; Fax: +86-27-87543632; E-mail: zhende_888@126.com;
Tao Li, Tel: +86-27-87557350; Fax: +86-27-87543632; E-mail:taoli@hust.edu.cn
These authors contributed equally to this work
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21473064)
Abstract: Contaminants (K, Na, Ca, and Mg) were introduced into Cu-SAPO-18 via incipient wetness impregnation to investigate their effect on the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 (NH3-SCR) over Cu-SAPO-18. After the introduction of contaminants into Cu-SAPO-18, the quantity of acidic sites and Cu2+ species in catalyst decreases owing to the replacement of H+ and Cu2+ by K+, Na+, Ca2+, and Mg2+. Furthermore, the loss of isolated Cu2+ induces the generation of CuO and CuAl2O4-like phases, which causes further loss in the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller surface area of the catalyst. Consequently, the deNOx performance of the contaminated Cu-SAPO-18 catalysts drops. Such decline in NH3-SCR performance becomes more pronounced by increasing the contaminant contents from 0.5 to 1.0 mmol/gcatal. In addition, the deactivation influence of the contaminants on Cu-SAPO-18 is presented in the order of K > Na > Ca > Mg, which is consistent with the order of reduction of acidic sites. To a certain degree, the effect of the acidic sites on the deactivation of Cu-SAPO-18 might be more significant than that of isolated Cu2+ and the catalyst framework. Moreover, kinetic analysis of NH3-SCR was conducted, and the results indicate that there is no influence of contaminants on the NH3-SCR mechanism.
© 2019, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Cu-SAPO-18 catalyst    Basic inorganic contaminant    Selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3    Acidic site    Isolated Cu2+    
柴油机尾气中的碱性无机污染物引起Cu-SAPO-18脱硝催化剂的化学失活
明淑君a,†, 庞磊b,†, 范驰a, 郭文a, 董亚浩a, 刘鹏a, 陈真a, 李涛a     
a. 华中科技大学化学与化工学院, 能量转换存储材料化学教育部重点实验室, 材料化学与服役失效湖北省重点实验室, 湖北武汉 430074;
b. 武汉东风汽车研发中心, 湖北武汉 430056
摘要:选择性催化还原NOx(NH3-SCR)已是柴油机尾气处理系统中有效的NOx减排技术.铜基分子筛催化剂作为潜在的NH3-SCR催化剂已被广泛研究,其中具有AEI结构的Cu-SAPO-18分子筛表现出优异的脱硝活性和水热稳定性,成为柴油机尾气后处理系统潜在的替代品.然而在实际的后处理应用中,生物柴油污染物、发动机润滑剂和燃料添加剂中的一些无机组分(K,Na,S,P,Ca和Mg等)可逐渐聚集在催化剂表面,导致催化剂孔道堵塞和活性位点丢失,最终导致SCR催化剂失活.由于碱金属和碱土金属在柴油衍生物中含量较高,因而其对SCR催化剂的影响引起了人们更多的关注.本文采用浸渍法制备了掺杂不同含量碱性无机污染物(K,Na,Ca和Mg)的Cu-SAPO-18催化剂,以阐明这些污染物对Cu-SAPO-18结构、酸性位点和铜物种的影响.XRD和氮吸附实验结果表明,低含量污染物的掺入造成催化剂孔道堵塞和比表面积下降,而高含量污染物引入导致催化剂部分结构被破坏,其中高含量Na的引入造成催化剂结构破坏最为严重.H2-TPR和EPR结果表明,污染物引入Cu-SAPO-18后,催化剂的Cu2+数目减少,这是由于Cu2+被K+,Na+,Ca2+和Mg2+取代造成的.被取代的Cu2+由于无法位于离子交换位点上会在煅烧过程中转变成CuO和CuAl2O4,CuO的产生会造成催化剂孔道堵塞甚至部分骨架结构坍塌.另外,NH3-TPD结果表明,与新鲜催化剂相比,被污染的Cu-SAPO-18催化剂总酸性位点减少,这是由于H+和Cu2+被K+,Na+,Ca2+和Mg2+取代造成Brönsted酸和Lewis酸减少造成的.催化剂比表面积的降低、Cu2+数目以及酸含量的减少最终造成催化剂失活,且催化剂失活程度随无机污染物含量的增加而增大.但不同无机组分造成催化剂的失活程度不同,其中K,Na,Ca和Mg造成Cu-SAPO-18催化剂失活程度为K > Na > Ca > Mg.此外,K,Na,Ca和Mg造成Cu-SAPO-18催化剂比表面积、Cu2+含量以及酸含量的减少程度分别为Na > K > Ca > Mg,Na > K > Mg > Ca和K > Na > Ca > Mg.其中酸含量下降程度与催化剂失活程度一致,表明在某种程度上,酸含量对催化剂NH3-SCR活性的影响高于催化剂结构和Cu2+对活性的影响.最后,我们还通过NH3-SCR动力学测试研究了K,Na,Ca和Mg对Cu-SAPO-18催化NH3-SCR反应机理的影响,结果显示新鲜催化剂和被污染催化剂具有相近的活化能,表明无机污染物对Cu-SAPO-18催化NH3-SCR反应机理没有影响.
关键词Cu-SAPO-18催化剂    碱性无机污染物    NH3选择性催化还原NOx    酸性位点    铜离子    

1 Introduction

Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NOx with NH3 as the reductant has been shown to be a well-established NOx abatement technology in diesel exhaust aftertreatment systems [1-3]. Extensive investigations have been conducted on copper-ion-exchanged zeolite catalysts as potential NH3-SCR catalysts [4-6]. Recently, small-pore-sized Cu-chabazite (CHA) molecular sieves, e.g., Cu-SSZ-13 and Cu-SAPO-34, have received extensive attention due to their extraordinary deNOx activities, broad activity temperature window, and high hydrothermal stability [5, 7]. In addition, both Cu-SAPO-18 and Cu-SSZ-39 molecular sieves, which possess an AEI construction similar to CHA, exhibit exceptional NO conversion and hydrothermally stable properties [8-12]. In general, the deNOx performance and hydrothermal resistance over copper-zeolite catalyst are related to active Cu2+ sites and acidic sites. Meanwhile, the amount of acidic sites and Cu2+ substances in Cu-SAPO-18 can be tuned by altering the quantity of Si and Cu [13-15], which could facilitate the selection of more effective and hydrothermally stable Cu-SAPO-18 catalysts. These realities enable Cu-SAPO-18 as a potential alternative in diesel exhaust aftertreatment systems.

In practical aftertreatment applications, the resistance of SCR catalysts to thermal and chemical damage is an especially significant issue [16]. The total mileage of diesel vehicles is considerably high, and SCR catalysts are repeatedly exposed to high temperatures during the operation of the engine, which could cause the breakdown of catalyst texture and the aggregation of metal active species [17]. Furthermore, some inorganic compositions (e.g., K, Na, S, P, Ca, and Mg), which are derived from the contaminants of biodiesel, and the lubricant and fuel additives, can gradually aggregate on the catalyst surface, resulting in gradual pore blocking and the loss of active sites of SCR catalysts [16-18]. Finally, SCR catalysts will undergo a decline in catalytic activity. The influence of alkali and alkaline earth metals on SCR catalysts has attracted more interest due to their significant content in diesel derivatives [18].

Recently, the deactivation of V2O5/WO3-TiO2, caused by K, Na, Ca, and Mg, has been investigated, concluding that the introduction of these metals brings about the decrease in acidity and redox ability of the catalyst [19-21]. There are some reports on the effect of alkali and alkaline earth metals on the structure, acidity, and active species of different Cu-based zeolites. For instance, Fehrmann et al. [22] announced that Cu-zeolite catalytic agents, which had large surface area and strong acidity, showed favorable K resistance. However, Lezcano-Gonzalez et al. [17] reported that the contamination of Cu-SSZ-13 by Ca2+ led to pore blocking, resulting in its deactivation. Gao et al. [23] introduced Li+, K+, Cs+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ into SSZ-13, resulting in the decrease of Brønsted acidic sites (H+). Meanwhile, the remaining H+ content is consistent with these hydrated metal ions diameters, which is presented in the order of Mg2+ > Ca2+ ≈ Li+ > Na+ > K+ > Cs+. Additionally, when K+ was introduced into Cu-SAPO-34, the Cu2+ content and the number of acidic sites is reduced, leading to the decrease in NH3-SCR activity [24]. However, to our knowledge, there is no comprehensive study regarding the effect of contaminants (K, Na, Ca, and Mg) on the framework, the content of copper species, and the availability of acidic sites on Cu-SAPO-18.

Consequently, Cu-SAPO-18 catalyst, doped with diverse contaminants (K, Na, Ca, and Mg), was prepared, with the aim of elucidating the impact of these metals on the construction, availability of acidic sites and content of copper species on Cu-SAPO-18. NO conversion is discussed based on the variation in these physicochemical properties of Cu-SAPO-18. Additionally, the influence of metals on the NH3-SCR reaction was also investigated through kinetic examination of NH3-SCR.

2 Experimental
2.1 Preparation of the fresh and contaminated Cu-SAPO-18 catalysts

The Cu-SAPO-18 catalyst (SiO2:Al2O3:P2O5:Cu-TETA:DIPEA: H2O = 0.6:1:0.9:0.1:1.65:45) was directly synthesized, and the elaborate synthesis procedure was explained in other studies [11, 13]. The final Cu-SAPO-18 powder was doped with K, Na, Ca, and Mg, containing 0.5 and 1.0 mmol/gcatal, by instilling the desired concentration of KNO3, NaNO3, Ca(NO3)2, and Mg(NO3)2 solution into the Cu-SAPO-18 catalyst. Then, the slurries were dried under air overnight at 90 ℃. Next, the powders were calcined at 600 ℃ for 5 h. The resulting powders were labeled Cu/M-SAPO-18(x), where "M" denotes the impregnated metals (M = K, Na, Ca, and Mg) and "x" stands for the metal amount. Finally, a certain amount of Cu/M-SAPO-18(x) was coated on the cordierite, respectively. The obtained monolithic catalysts were applied to evaluate NO conversion. More details are displayed in the Supporting Information.

2.2 Catalyst characterization

N2 adsorption-desorption was conducted on the V-Sorb 2800 P instrument to obtain the pore volume and BET specific surface area of the catalysts, and the samples were degassed at 250 ℃ for 5 h under vacuum before the measurement. 27Al MAS nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were obtained on an Agilent 600 DD2 spectrometer with a Larmor frequency of 156.25 MHz. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) charts were acquired from an X'Pert Pro X-ray diffractometer with Cu-Kα radiation, at 40 mA and 40 kV. H2 temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) was recorded on an automatic chemisorption instrument (Auto Chem 2920II). The catalyst (50 mg) was preprocessed under Ar gas flow at 550 ℃ for 1.5 h and, subsequently, the catalyst was heated from ambient temperature to 1000 ℃ under a 10% H2/Ar gas mixture. As for NH3 temperature-programmed desorption (NH3-TPD), the catalyst pretreatment process was consistent with that of TPR. The NH3 adsorption of catalyst took place at 100 ℃, and the process was retained for 45 min. Ultimately, the catalyst temperature was elevated from 100 to 600 ℃ under Ar gas flow. The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrum was obtained with a JEOL-FA200 apparatus. The catalyst (10 mg) placed in a tube was subjected to EPR measurements at –170 ℃ with a modulated frequency of 100 kHz and an amplitude of 5 G.

2.3 NH3-SCR performance and the dynamic measurement

The catalytic performance of monolithic Cu-SAPO-18 was carried out in a stainless-steel tubular reactor under a fixed bed. A total of 250 g/L of Cu-SAPO-18 was inserted into the constant temperature zone of the reactor. Then, a thermocouple was stuck into the uniform temperature region to detect the bed temperature. The simulated reactant gases consisted of NO, NH3, O2, and H2O, which accounted for 0.1%, 0.11%, 5%, and 10%, respectively. Meanwhile, N2 was used as a carrier gas to purge these reactant gases into the reactor. The H2O was produced by an injection pump (TYD01-01) containing deionized water. The overall gas flow velocity was 1045 mL/min. After the finish of the SCR reaction inside the catalyst bed, the remaining content of NO was investigated in a waste gas emission analyzer (FGA-4100-5G). Moreover, an NH3 trap was installed in front of the analyzer to avert errors arising from excessive NH3. The NO conversion was computed as ([NO]inlet–[NO]outlet)/[NO]inlet × 100%.

The NH3-SCR dynamic tests over fresh and contaminated Cu-SAPO-18 were executed in the reactor described above, using 60 g/L monolithic catalyst. The concentration of the simulated reaction gas and the corresponding overall gas flow velocity are the same as depicted above. Dynamic steady-state evaluations were conducted, ranging from 140 to 190 ℃. The exhaust fumes discharged from the fixed bed were monitored by a flume emission analyzer. The calculation formula for the NH3-SCR reaction rates is exhibited in the Supporting Information.

3 Results and discussion
3.1 Chemical composition and textural characteristics

Table 1 shows the elemental compositions of the fresh and contaminated Cu-SAPO-18 samples, and the compositions were determined by ICP-OES technology. The molar ratio of Si:Al:P in all samples is 0.27:0.68:1.0. The Cu content in fresh Cu-SAPO-18 is 2.10 wt%, and other contaminated samples present similar Cu content. Furthermore, the contents of K, Na, Ca, and Mg in Cu-SAPO-18 are analogous to the theoretical results (0.5 mmol/gcatal or 1.0 mmol/gcatal).

Table 1
The element composition, BET surface area, and pore volume of catalysts with and without contaminants.

To determine the influence of contaminants on the Cu-SAPO-18 structure, XRD and BET tests were conducted. Fig. 1a illustrates that both fresh Cu-SAPO-18 and Cu/M-SAPO-18(0.5) catalysts exhibit the typical AEI structure [11, 25] and retain similar intensities in diffraction peaks, suggesting that the loading of 0.50 mmol/gcatal contaminants has little effect on AEI structure or the crystallinity of Cu-SAPO-18. Moreover, there are no CuO nor K, Na, Ca, or Mg peaks observed, which indicates that they are highly dispersed on Cu-SAPO-18 or that there is a detection limitation because of their small sizes [3]. When the metal content increases to 1.0 mmol/gcatal, the Cu/K-, Cu/Ca-, and Cu/Mg-SAPO-18(1.0) catalysts all preserve the typical AEI framework but is accompanied by a decrease in their crystallinity. This reveals that their zeolite frameworks suffer some damage. For the Cu/Na-SAPO-18(1.0) catalyst, its crystallinity decreases noticeably (as shown in Fig. S2). Meanwhile, a rather strong tridymite diffraction peak is detected [26, 27], illustrating that the introduction of excessive Na into the Cu-SAPO-18 catalyst causes partial decomposition of its structure. In addition, significant diffraction peaks of CuO species over Cu/Na-SAPO-18(1.0) catalyst at 35.5° and 38.6° are detected [13, 28], causing speculation that a large amount of Na facilitates the aggregation of copper species as CuO clusters over the external surface of the Cu/Na-SAPO-18(1.0) catalyst, resulting in partial structure collapse.

Fig. 1. XRD patterns of catalysts with and without contaminants.

As displayed in Table 1, the introduction of contaminants into Cu-SAPO-18 affects the BET surface area and pore volume of the catalyst. It is worth noting that the specific surface area and pore volume decrease for all catalysts with 0.5 mmol/gcatal contaminants, in contrast to the fresh catalyst, to which the partial pore blocking by copper species is ascribed [29, 30]. With the increase in contaminant content to 1.0 mmol/gcatal, the Cu/M-SAPO-18(1.0) exhibits a greater decrease in the BET surface area and pore volume, which is due to the partial deterioration of the zeolite construction. In addition, such a decrease in the BET surface area and pore volume varies with distinct metals. For instance, the BET surface area for Cu/K-, Cu/Na-, Cu/Ca-, and Cu/Mg-SAPO-18(1.0) is reduced by 40.1%, 56.0%, 39.4%, and 38.0%, respectively, and the pore volume decreases by 40.7%, 58.1%, 40.7%, and 39.4%, respectively. This phenomenon demonstrates that the destruction on the Cu-SAPO-18 structures caused by Na is more severe than that from K, Ca, and Mg, which is in accordance with XRD results.

To further affirm the above observations, the 27Al MAS NMR was measured to detect the variation in the Al coordination of Cu-SAPO-18. Fig. 2 presents the 27Al NMR spectra of the fresh and contaminated catalysts. Three peaks appear for all samples at 39, 13, and -13 ppm. The three peaks are attributed to the tetrahedrally coordinated framework of Al atoms (AlIV), pentahedrally coordinated Al atoms (AlV), and octahedrally coordinated Al atoms (AlVI), respectively [31, 32]. The percentage ratio of the diverse Al coordination structures is summarized in Table 2. In terms of the fresh catalyst, the proportion of the framework AlIV species is 61.8%. After impregnating the catalyst with 0.5 mmol/gcatal contaminants, the percentage of tetrahedral Al atoms in Cu/K-, Cu/Na-, Cu/Ca-, and Cu/Mg-SAPO-18(0.5) catalysts drops to 47.0%, 45.3%, 50.8%, and 55.0%, respectively. This causes the breakage of Si–O–Al bonds, leading to the transformation of framework AlVI species to pentahedral and octahedral Al atoms [33]. With the increase in contaminants to 1.0 mmol/gcatal, the percentage of AlIV species for Cu/M-SAPO-18(1.0) catalysts decreases more than that for Cu/M-SAPO-18(0.5) catalysts. It is remarkable that the loss of framework AlIV species in Cu/Na-SAPO-18(1.0) is greater than that for the other Cu/M-SAPO-18(1.0) catalysts, implying a more serious destruction in the Cu/Na-SAPO-18(1.0) framework. These data are consistent with BET results.

Fig. 2. 27Al NMR spectra of the catalysts with and without contaminants.
Table 2
The percentages of the various Al coordination frameworks in the catalysts with and without contaminants based on the 27Al NMR spectra results.
3.2 The combination of H2-TPR and EPR

The H2-TPR curves were analyzed to identify the distribution of different copper species in all samples. As seen from Fig. 3, five reduction peaks (A, B, C, E, and F) in the fresh sample are monitored. Peak A at 244 ℃ and peak C at 331 ℃ are the representative reduction peaks in the isolated Cu2+ substances, residing at the ellipsoidal cavity near the six-membered ring and in the center of the hexagonal prism, respectively [5, 34, 35]. Peak B at 289 ℃ corresponds to the reduction of CuO to Cu0 via a single-step procedure [35]. The unstable and high steady Cu+ substances were reduced to Cu0, resulting in the generation of peak E at 570 ℃ and peak F above 900 ℃. The Cu+ substances are derived from two aspects, the incompletely reduced Cu2+ and the inherent existence in the sample [36, 37]. Nevertheless, when K, Na, Ca, and Mg are introduced into Cu-SAPO-18, a new peak (D) is detected. According to the 27Al-NMR results, the contaminated catalysts possess a greater extra-framework Al percentage than the fresh catalyst, and the extra-structure Al can react with isolated Cu2+ substances to generate CuAl2O4-like species [23, 38, 39]. Thus, the new peak (D) is assigned to the reduction of CuAl2O4-like species.

Fig. 3. H2-TPR curves of catalysts with and without contaminants.

Based on Fig. 3a, after impregnating the fresh catalyst with 0.5 mmol/gcatal contaminants, the peak intensity of isolated Cu2+ substances in the ellipsoidal cavity (peak A) decreases significantly, and the isolated Cu2+ substances in the hexagonal prism (peak C) are also slightly reduced. Such a decline is interpreted by the replacement of partially isolated Cu2+ by K+, Na+, Ca2+, and Mg2+, separately. Concomitantly, the peak intensity of CuO and CuAl2O4-like substances increases, owing to the fact that the replaced Cu2+ ions, free from the ion exchange sites, will aggregate into CuO species or react with extra-framework Al, forming CuAl2O4 during calcination [23, 24]. This will block the micropore of the Cu-SAPO-18 catalyst. After increasing the amount of contaminants to 1.0 mmol/gcatal, the fall in the peak intensity of isolated Cu2+ substances at low reduction temperatures is dramatic, indicating that isolated Cu2+ species in the ellipsoidal cavity are so unstable that they are prone to be replaced. Simultaneously, more CuO and CuAl2O4 species appear, arising from the transformation of many Cu2+ substances during calcination. Strikingly, notwithstanding the great many CuO species generated in Cu/Na-SAPO-18(1.0) during calcination, the formation of CuO species would cause severe damage to its framework [39], which could be demonstrated by XRD and BET results.

In addition, EPR analysis was also measured to further investigate the coordination environment of isolated Cu2+ and semi-quantitatively confirm the isolated Cu2+ content [27, 40]. As Fig. 4 shows, the Cu2+ substances in the fresh and contaminated hydrated Cu-SAPO-18 catalysts all show one peak, which is an axially symmetric signal, implying that there is only one type of isolated Cu2+ substance in the hydrated samples. The EPR signal values of g= 2.393 mT, g= 2.06 mT, and A= 13.11 mT correspond to the isolated Cu2+, which is octahedrally coordinated to the three oxygens of the zeolite structure and the three water molecules, residing in the ellipsoidal cavity near the six-membered ring [41, 42]. However, two kinds of isolated Cu2+ species are observed in H2-TPR profiles, which might be due to the migration of isolated Cu2+ from one location to another during thermal treatment [5, 41].

Fig. 4. EPR spectra (a, b) of catalysts with and without contaminants. (c) The concentration of Cu2+ ions of Cu-SAPO-18 determined on the basis of EPR spectra.

Concurrently, the amount of total isolated Cu2+ is semi-quantitatively determined via the double integration of the EPR spectra and the outcomes are plotted in Fig. 4c. After K, Na, Ca, and Mg impregnation, the quantity of total isolated Cu2+ in contaminated Cu/M-SAPO-18(x) decreases compared to the fresh catalyst, and higher contaminant content corresponds to a greater decrease in the sum of Cu2+ substances, revealing the H2-TPR outcome. Moreover, the extent of the K, Na, Ca, and Mg contaminated effect on the Cu2+ substances of Cu-SAPO-18 reveals a disparity. For instance, the total isolated Cu2+ contents in Cu/K-, Cu/Na-, Cu/Ca-, and Cu/Mg-SAPO-18(0.5) are reduced by 11.3%, 20.9%, 7.7%, and 8.4%, respectively. Increasing the contaminants to 1.0 mmol/gcatal, the impregnation of K, Na, Ca, and Mg decreases the sum of the total Cu2+ substances by 30.4%, 48.9%, 21.2%, and 24.3%, respectively. Consequently, it can be concluded that the impregnation of Cu-SAPO-18 catalyst with K and Na gives rise to greater substitution of Cu2+ species, especially with Na. Such a substitution will lead to the reduction in Lewis acid sites generated by isolated Cu2+.

3.3 The acid site properties

The variation in acidic sites of fresh and contaminated Cu-SAPO-18 was investigated by measuring NH3-TPD. Fig. 5 displays the NH3-TPD curves. Three NH3 desorption peaks appear, which are attributed to NH3 molecule desorption from weak Brønsted acidic sites (peak A, Si–OH and P–OH), Lewis acidic sites (peak B), and strong Brønsted acidic sites (Si–OH–Al) and strong Lewis acidic sites related to Cu2+ species (peak C) [14, 33, 43, 44]. Additionally, the K-, Na-, Ca-, and Mg-contaminated Cu-SAPO-18 catalysts also exhibit three similar desorption peaks, and the number of acidic sites is calculated from the NH3-TPD curves and summarized in Table 3.

Fig. 5. NH3-TPD curves of catalysts with and without contaminants.
Table 3
The sum of acidic sites in catalysts with and without contaminants based on the NH3-TPD results.

As shown in Table 3, the number of overall acidic sites within Cu/M-SAPO-18(0.5) is less than that of the fresh Cu-SAPO-18 catalyst. This phenomenon is due to the Brønsted acidic sites (H+) and Lewis acidic sites (Cu2+ species) being replaced by K, Na, Ca, and Mg, and the pore blocking of Cu/M-SAPO-18(0.5), which could cause partial coverage of acidic sites [17, 23, 45]. Moreover, Cu/K-SAPO-18(0.5) catalyst exhibits weak desorption over the entire temperature range, suggesting that the K+ located at ion exchange sites of Cu-SAPO-18 shows low affinity to NH3 [23, 24]. However, it seems that Na+ could adsorb NH3 molecules, as demonstrated by the increased number of weak and moderate acidic sites (peak A and peak B) in Cu/Na-SAPO-18(0.5) below 300 ℃ [23]. Meanwhile, the adsorption of NH3 molecules onto Ca2+ and Mg2+ at moderate temperatures corresponds to the increase in the content of moderate acidic sites (peak B) of Cu/Ca- and Cu/Mg-SAPO-18(0.5) samples [17, 23]. With the increase in contaminants to 1.0 mmol/gcatal, the overall acidic sites in Cu/M-SAPO-18(1.0) decreases strikingly, which is explained by a greater loss of H+ and Cu2+, and the covering of acidic sites, induced by local structure collapse. The impregnation of K, Na, Ca, and Mg on the raw sample took place at the expense of Brønsted acidic sites, Cu2+ substances, and the surface area, leading to the decrease in the overall acidic sites of Cu/M-SAPO-18(x).

Furthermore, the decrease in the overall acidic sites within Cu/M-SAPO-18(x) follows the order Cu/K- > Cu/Na- > Cu/Ca- > Cu/Mg-SAPO-18(x). This is opposite to the effective hydrated diameter of the contaminants, which is presented in the order K+ < Na+ < Ca2+ < Mg2+ [46]. Although two K+ or Na+ can substitute for two H+ or one Cu2+, and one Ca2+ or Mg2+ can replace two H+ or one Cu2+, K+ and Na+ with smaller hydrated diameters are more prone to enter the pores of Cu-SAPO-18 catalyst than Ca2+ and Mg2+ with larger hydrated diameters. Consequently, a larger quantity of Brønsted acidic sites and isolated Cu2+ is easier to exchange with K+ and Na+, leading to a greater reduction in total acidic sites in Cu/K- and Cu/Na-SAPO-18(x).

3.4 The effect of contaminants on NH3-SCR performance

During the deNOx reaction, NH3 molecules could adsorb on both isolated Cu2+ and Brønsted acidic sites, while the deNOx reaction solely happens on isolated Cu2+, identified as the active sites [5, 33]. At low temperatures, only the NH3 molecules adsorbed on isolated Cu2+ take part in the deNOx reaction. Thus, the isolated Cu2+ species at low reduction temperatures affect the low-temperature NO conversion. At high temperatures, the adsorption of NH3 on the isolated Cu2+ is unstable. Therefore, the NH3-SCR reaction occurs by supplying the NH3 from the Brønsted acidic sites to the Cu2+ substances [47, 48]. This indicates that the NO conversion is involved in the acidic sites and Cu2+ substances.

Fig. 6 depicts the NH3-SCR performance over the fresh and contaminated Cu-SAPO-18. The fresh Cu-SAPO-18 catalyst reveals outstanding catalytic activity during the entire temperature range, and the NO conversion exceeds 90% in the temperature region of 200–525 ℃ because of the existence of a great many acidic sites and Cu2+ substances. After the doping of 0.5 mmol/gcatal or 1.0 mmol/gcatal of contaminants to Cu-SAPO-18, all contaminated catalysts suffer deactivation, and their catalytic activities decrease in the entire temperature range. The higher the contaminant content, the more pronounced the decrease in NO conversion. Such a decrease is due to the reduction in acidic sites and Cu2+ content, and the structural damage. Meanwhile, the decline in isolated Cu2+ in the ellipsoidal cavity is responsible for the decrease in the low-temperature deNOx activity [15]. The NH3 oxidation induced by the large quantity of CuO species leads to the decline in high-temperature NH3-SCR activities [7]. Simultaneously, the deactivation effect of contaminants on Cu-SAPO-18 is different, which is presented by the order K > Na > Ca > Mg. For instance, the catalytic performance of Cu/Mg-SAPO-18(0.5) is approximately 87% from 275 to 450 ℃. In contrast, the highest NO conversion within Cu/K-SAPO-18(0.5) is only 78% at 350–475 ℃. Furthermore, comparing Cu/Ca- to Cu/Na-SAPO-18(0.5), the former exhibits slightly higher catalytic performance (around 82%) than the latter from 250 to 475 ℃. For the 1.0 mmol/gcatal contaminants, the highest NO conversion over Cu/K-, Cu/Na-, and Cu/Ca-SAPO-18(1.0) catalysts is 24% at 525 ℃, 40% at 525 ℃, and 60% at 475 ℃, respectively, corresponding to a decline of 76%, 60%, and 40% compared with the fresh catalyst, respectively. However, the highest catalytic activity of Cu/Mg-SAPO-18(1.0) is 85% at 425–450 ℃. The deactivation in the fresh catalyst is related to the decreased level in isolated Cu2+ and acidic sites, and the framework damage.

Fig. 6. deNOx performance of catalysts with and without contaminants.

Fig. 7 shows the relative number of acidic sites (according to the NH3-TPD results) and isolated Cu2+ (according to the EPR results) as a function of the actual metal content. The introduction of K, Na, and Ca into the Cu-SAPO-18 results in a reduced number of acidic sites more significant than that of isolated Cu2+. This shows that the K+, Na+, and Ca2+ ions are more apt to exchange with H+ than Cu2+. However, Mg2+ seems to easily substitute for the Cu2+ instead of H+, as demonstrated by the more distinct diminished level of Cu2+ substances in Cu/Mg-SAPO-18(x). Simultaneously, the Cu2+ ions, free from the Cu-SPAO-18 catalyst, can transform into the CuO species during calcination, which can cause the catalyst structural damage and decline in specific areas. Furthermore, the Cu2+ content of Cu/M-SAPO-18(x) follows the order: Cu/Na- > Cu/K- > Cu/Mg- > Cu/Ca-SAPO-18(x). The decrease in the BET specific area for Cu/M-SAPO-18(x) follows the order: Cu/Na- < Cu/K- < Cu/Ca- < Cu/Mg-SAPO-18(x). The reduction in the number of acidic sites of Cu/M-SAPO-18(x) is presented in the order: Cu/K- > Cu/Na- > Cu/Ca- > Cu/Mg-SAPO-18(x), which corresponds to the extent of catalyst deactivation. A conclusion that can be drawn is that deNOx activity can be jointly affected by the isolated Cu2+, catalyst structure, and acidic sites. However, the acidic sites might affect the NH3-SCR activity more significantly than isolated Cu2+ and catalyst structure. Additionally, the kinetics studies were carried out at low temperature to investigate the effect of the contaminants on NH3-SCR mechanism. As shown in Fig. 8, all catalysts possess similar apparent activation energies, indicating that the existence of K, Na, Ca, and Mg has little influence on deNOx mechanism over Cu-SAPO-18 [23]. Moreover, the NO conversion speeds correspond to the NH3-SCR activities. This suggests that a larger number of acidic sites and Cu2+ substances in the catalyst correspond to better catalytic activity.

Fig. 7. The relative content of acidic sites (according to the NH3-TPD results) and the relative number of isolated Cu2+ ions (according to the EPR results) as a function of actual metal ion content.
Fig. 8. The results of the NH3-SCR kinetic evaluation over catalysts with and without contaminants at low temperature.
4 Conclusions

Cu-SAPO-18 contaminated by K, Na, Ca, and Mg suffers deactivation in the NH3-SCR reaction. Such deactivation becomes more significant by increasing the contaminant content from 0.5 to 1.0 mmol/gcatal. The deactivation of Cu-SAPO-18 is connected with the decline in the content of acidic sites and Cu2+ substances, and the framework destruction of the catalyst. When the K, Na, Ca, and Mg was introduced into Cu-SAPO-18, these metal ions, with different hydrated ion diameters, substitute for the H+ or Cu2+ to different extents. This leads to different degrees of decrease in Cu2+ substances and acidic sites. Cu2+, unable to interact with the ion exchange sites, transform into the CuO species and CuAl2O4-like species during high-temperature calcination. This causes Cu-SAPO-18 to experience micropore blockage and further covers the acidic sites of the catalyst. Finally, the deactivation of Cu-SAPO-18 follows the order of Cu/K- > Cu/Na- > Cu/Ca- > Cu/Mg-SAPO-18(x), which corresponds to the effect of the contaminants on the acidic sites. Thus, to some extent, the influence of acidic sites on NO conversion seems to be more conspicuous. Finally, the evaluation of NH3-SCR dynamics was conducted. It can be concluded that the introduction of contaminants into Cu-SAPO-18 shows little influence on the deNOx mechanism.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the tests offered by the Analysis and Testing Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

References
[1]
F. Liu, Y. Yu, H. He, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 8445-8463. DOI:10.1039/C4CC01098A
[2]
L. Xie, F. Liu, X. Shi, F. Xiao, H. He, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 179, 206-212. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.032
[3]
T. Yu, M. Xu, Y. Huang, J. Wang, J. Wang, L. Lv, G. Qi, W. Li, M. Shen, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 204, 525-536. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.12.007
[4]
D. W. Fickel, E. D' D' Addio, J. A. Lauterbach, R. F. Lobo, Appl. Catal. B, 2011, 102, 441-448. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.12.022
[5]
L. Xie, F. Liu, L. Ren, X. Shi, F. Xiao, H. He, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2014, 48, 566-572. DOI:10.1021/es4032002
[6]
X. Shi, H. He, L. Xie, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36, 649-656. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(14)60268-0
[7]
C. Niu, X. Shi, F. Liu, K. Liu, L. Xie, Y. You, H. He, Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 294, 254-263. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.086
[8]
M. Moliner, C. Franch, E. Palomares, M. Grill, A. Corma, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 8264-8266. DOI:10.1039/c2cc33992g
[9]
N. Martín, C. R. Boruntea, M. Moliner, A. Corma, Chem. Commun., 2015, 51, 11030-11033. DOI:10.1039/C5CC03200H
[10]
Y. Li, W. Song, J. Liu, Z. Zhao, M. Gao, Y. Wei, Q. Wang, J. Deng, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 330, 926-935.
[11]
R. Martínez-Franco, M. Moliner, A. Corma, J. Catal., 2014, 319, 36-43. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2014.08.005
[12]
Q. Ye, L. Wang, R. T. Yang, Appl. Catal. A, 2012, 427-428, 24-34.
[13]
Z. Chen, C. Fan, L. Pang, S. Ming, W. Guo, P. Liu, H. Chen, T. Li, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 348, 608-617. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.033
[14]
S. Ming, Z. Chen, C. Fan, L. Pang, W. Guo, K. B. Albert, P. Liu, T. Li, Appl. Catal. A, 2018, 559, 47-56. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2018.04.008
[15]
Y. Li, J. Deng, W. Song, J. Liu, Z. Zhao, M. Gao, Y. Wei, L. Zhao, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120, 14669-14680. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03464
[16]
O. Kröcher, M. Elsener, Appl. Catal. B, 2008, 77, 215-227. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.04.021
[17]
I. Lezcano-Gonzalez, U. Deka, H. E. van der Bij, P. Paalanen, B. Arstad, B. M. Weckhuysen, A. M. Beale, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 154-155, 339-349.
[18]
M. Klimczak, P. Kern, T. Heinzelmann, M. Lucas, P. Claus, Appl. Catal. B, 2010, 95, 39-47. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.12.007
[19]
Q. Wan, L. Duan, J. Li, L. Chen, K. He, J. Hao, Catal. Today, 2011, 175, 189-195. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2011.03.011
[20]
L. Chen, J. Li, M. Ge, Chem. Eng. J., 2011, 170, 531-537. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2010.11.020
[21]
J. Cao, X. Yao, F. Yang, L. Chen, M. Fu, C. Tang, L. Dong, Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 40, 95-104. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63184-5
[22]
S. S. R. Putluru, A. Riisager, R. Fehrmann, Appl. Catal. B, 2011, 101, 183-188. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.09.015
[23]
F. Gao, Y. Wang, N. M. Washton, M. Koll, J. Szanyi, C. H. F. Peden, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 6780-6791. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.5b01621
[24]
J. Ma, Z. Si, D. Weng, X. Wu, Y. Ma, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 267, 191-200. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2014.11.020
[25]
R. Martínez-Franco, Z. Li, J. Martínez-Triguero, M. Moliner, A. Corma, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6, 2796-2806. DOI:10.1039/C5CY02298C
[26]
R. Martínez-Franco, M. Moliner, P. Concepcion, J. R. Thogersen, A. Corma, J. Catal., 2014, 314, 73-82. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2014.03.018
[27]
F. Gao, E. D. Walter, N. M. Washton, J. Szanyi, C. H. F. Peden, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 162, 501-514. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.07.029
[28]
L. Wang, J. R. Gaudet, W. Li, D. Weng, J. Catal., 2013, 306, 68-77. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2013.06.010
[29]
B. M. Abu-Zied, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2011, 139, 59-66. DOI:10.1016/j.micromeso.2010.10.017
[30]
B. Pereda-Ayo, U. De La Torre, M. J. Illán-Gómez, A. Bueno-López, J. R. González-Velasco, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 147, 420-428. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.09.010
[31]
A. Buchholz, W. Wang, M. Xu, A. Arnold, M. Hunger, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2002, 56, 267-278. DOI:10.1016/S1387-1811(02)00491-2
[32]
J. Chen, P. A. Wright, J. M. Thomas, S. Natarajan, L. Marchese, S. M. Bradley, G. Sankar, C. R. A. Catlow, P. L. Gai-Boyes, J. Phys. Chem., 1994, 98, 10216-10224. DOI:10.1021/j100091a042
[33]
J. Wang, D. Fan, T. Yu, J. Wang, T. Hao, X. Hu, M. Shen, W. Li, J. Catal., 2015, 322, 84-90. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2014.11.010
[34]
T. Yu, J. Wang, Y. Huang, M. Shen, W. Li, J. Wang, ChemCatChem, 2014, 6, 2074-2083. DOI:10.1002/cctc.v6.7
[35]
J. Xue, X. Wang, G. Qi, J. Wang, M. Shen, W. Li, J. Catal., 2013, 297, 56-64. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2012.09.020
[36]
B. Chen, R. Xu, R. Zhang, N. Liu, Environ, S ci, Technol., 2014, 48, 13909-13916. DOI:10.1021/es503707c
[37]
S. Han, Q. Ye, S. Cheng, T. Kang, H. Dai, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2017, 7, 703-717. DOI:10.1039/C6CY02555B
[38]
P. N. R. Vennestrøm, T. V. W. Janssens, A. Kustov, M. Grill, A. Puig-Molina, L. F. Lundegaard, R. R. Tiruvalam, P. Concepción, A. Corma, J. Catal., 2014, 309, 477-490. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2013.10.017
[39]
Z. Zhao, R. Yu, R. Zhao, C. Shi, H. Gies, F. Xiao, D. De Vos, T. Yokoi, X. Bao, U. Kolb, M. Feyen, R. McGuire, S. Maurer, A. Moini, U. Müller, W. Zhang, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 217, 421-428. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.013
[40]
A. Godiksen, F. N. Stappen, P. N. R. Vennestr, F. Giordanino, S. B. Rasmussen, L. F. Lundegaard, S. Mossin, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 23126-23138. DOI:10.1021/jp5065616
[41]
J. Wang, T. Yu, X. Wang, G. Qi, J. Xue, M. Shen, W. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2012, 127, 137-147. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.08.016
[42]
M. Zamadics, X. Chen, K. Larry, J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96, 2652-2657. DOI:10.1021/j100185a048
[43]
M. Xu, J. Wang, T. Yu, J. Wang, M. Shen, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 220, 161-170. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.031
[44]
T. Yu, J. Wang, M. Shen, W. Li, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2013, 3, 3234-3241. DOI:10.1039/c3cy00453h
[45]
C. Fan, Z. Chen, L. Pang, S. Ming, C. Dong, K. Brou Albert, P. Liu, J. Wang, D. Zhu, H. Chen, T. Li, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 334, 344-354. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.181
[46]
J. Kielland, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1937, 59, 1675-1678. DOI:10.1021/ja01288a032
[47]
T. Yu, T. Hao, D. Fan, J. Wang, M. Shen, W. Li, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, 6565-6575. DOI:10.1021/jp4114199
[48]
L. Wang, W. Li, S. J. Schmieg, D. Weng, J. Catal., 2015, 324, 98-106. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2015.01.011