催化学报  2019, Vol. 40 Issue (6): 826-836      DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63195-X   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Minglu Sun
Wendong Zhang
Yanjuan Sun
Yuxin Zhang
Fan Dong
Synergistic integration of metallic Bi and defects on BiOI:Enhanced photocatalytic NO removal and conversion pathway
Minglu Suna, Wendong Zhangb, Yanjuan Suna, Yuxin Zhangc, Fan Donga,d     
a. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Catalysis and New Environmental Materials, College of Environment and Resources, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China;
b. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Inorganic Functional Materials, Department of Scientific Research Management, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China;
c. College of Materials Science and Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;
d. Research Center for Environmental Science & Technology, Institute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
* Corresponding author. Yanjuan Sun, E-mail: syhsyj@163.com;
Fan Dong, Tel: +86-15922570175; E-mail: dfctbu@126.com
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21501016, 21777011 and 21822601), the National Key R & D Program of China (2016YFC02047), the Innovative Research Team of Chongqing (CXTDG201602014), the Key Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (cstc2017jcyjBX0052), and the National Ten Thousand Talent Program of China
Abstract: Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of metals may provide a way to improve light absorption and utilization of semiconductors, achieving better solar light conversion and photocatalysis efficiency. This study uses the advantages of SPR in metallic Bi and artificial defects to cooperatively enhance the photocatalytic performance of BiOI. The catalysts were prepared by partial reduction of BiOI to form Bi@defective BiOI, which showed highly enhanced visible photocatalytic activity for NOx removal. The effects of reductant quantity on the photocatalytic performance of Bi@defective BiOI were investigated. The as-prepared photocatalyst (Bi/BiOI-2) using 2 mmol of reductant NaBH4 showed the most efficient visible light photocatalytic activity. This enhanced activity can be ascribed to the synergistic effects of metallic Bi and oxygen vacancies. The electrons from the valence band tend to accumulate at vacancy states; therefore, the increased charge density would cause the adsorbed oxygen to transform more easily into superoxide radicals and, further, into hydroxyl radicals. These radicals are the main active species that oxidize NO into final products. The SPR effect of elemental Bi enables the improvement of visible light absorption efficiency and the promotion of charge carrier separation, which are crucial factors in boosting photocatalysis. NO adsorption and reaction processes on Bi/BiOI-2 were dynamically monitored by in situ infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). The Bi/BiOI photocatalysis mechanism co-mediated by elemental Bi and oxygen vacancies was proposed based on the analysis of intermediate products and DFT calculations. This present work could provide new insights into the design of high-performance photocatalysts and understanding of the photocatalysis reaction mechanism for air-purification applications.
© 2019, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Surface plasmon resonance    Bi metal    BiOI    Photocatalysis    Oxygen vacancy    Reaction mechanism    
BiOI上Bi单质和缺陷的协同作用:增强的光催化NO去除和转化途径
孙明禄a, 张文东b, 孙艳娟a, 张育新c, 董帆a,d     
a. 重庆工商大学环境与资源学院催化与环境新材料重庆市重点实验室, 重庆 400067;
b. 重庆师范大学科研处无机功能材料重庆市重点实验室, 重庆 401331;
c. 重庆大学材料科学与工程学院, 重庆 400044;
d. 电子科技大学基础与前沿研究院环境科学与技术研究中心, 四川成都 610500
摘要:BiOI具有独特的层状结构及较窄的带隙,是具有可见光响应的光催化剂.然而,高光生载流子复合率抑制了其光催化活性.大量研究表明,氧缺陷不但是催化剂表面最具活性的位点,而且可以通过减小禁带宽度扩大光响应范围.与此同时,氧缺陷也可以作为光致电荷陷阱,抑制电子-空穴复合,并作为电荷转移到吸附物种的吸附位点.金属的表面等离子体共振(SPR)效应为半导体材料更高效的光吸收和利用提供了一条崭新的途径,从而可以获得更好的太阳光转换和光催化效率.然而,SPR效应和由氧缺陷引起的多个中间能级协同作用还未被探究.本文研究了利用金属铋的SPR效应和引入缺陷共同提高BiOI的光催化性能.通过部分还原BiOI制备出具有较高可见光催化去除氮氧化物活性的Bi@缺陷型BiOI,研究了还原剂用量对Bi@缺陷型BiOI光催化性能的影响.发现用2mmol还原剂NaBH4制备的光催化剂(Bi/BiOI-2)具有最高效的可见光催化活性.XRD、XPS、SEM和TEM表征表明Bi单质沉积在BiOI表面,整个体系由纳米片自组装为海绵状立体结构.BET比表面积增大,结合SEM推测是由纳米片的分层堆叠造成的.UV-DRS表明带隙宽度仅有1.8eV的BiOI具有可见光响应.EPR和态密度(DOS)结合可以证明氧缺陷及其激发多个中间能级的存在.中间能级可以促进电子在可见光下从价带到导带的转移.PL表明体系中Bi金属的SPR效应所激发的电磁场可以促进光生载流子的分离.通过DFT理论计算催化剂的电子结构,差分、电子局域函数(ELF)及电势表明Bi单质和Bi-O层间强的共价作用形成一个通道,使得热电子从较高电势的Bi单质向相对低电势的BiOI传递,Bi单质PDOS的计算证明价带变宽归因于Bi元素轨道的贡献,Bi的SPR效应激发BiOI的电子到更高能级并聚集在价带顶,这有利于光生载流子的分离.ESR表明提升的电荷分离和迁移率促进了羟基和超氧自由基的产生.结合表征及理论计算结果,活性的增强可归因于金属Bi和氧空位的协同效应.氧缺陷激发的中间能级促进了电荷转移,Bi金属的SPR效应使可见光吸收效率提高并且促进了光生载流子分离,这些是增强光催化性能的关键因素.此外,采用原位红外光谱法(FT-IR)对Bi/BiOI-2的NO吸附和反应过程进行了动态监测.根据中间产物分析和DFT计算结果,提出了金属Bi和氧空位协同作用提高Bi/BiOI光催化性能的机理.本研究为高性能光催化剂的设计和理解空气净化光催化反应机理提供了新的思路.
关键词表面等离子体共振    金属Bi    BiOI    光催化    氧缺陷    反应机理    

1 Introduction

With increasing attention on serious air pollution problems, efficient reduction of nitrogen oxides in air has long been a hot topic in the field of photocatalysis [1]. Among various potential technologies, heterogeneous photocatalysis using semiconductor materials, such as bismuth-based layered semiconductors, has displayed promising results for environmental governance and solar energy conversion [2-12]. BiOI, which has a layered structure consisting of [Bi2O2]2+ layers sandwiched between two sheets of I ions, is a visible-light photocatalyst that can be activated by irradiation with visible light due to the narrow band gap [13, 14]. However, serious recombination of photogenerated charges prohibits the photocatalytic performance of BiOI.

Since visible light comprises the major part of solar light, a number of approaches have been developed to boost the visible light activity of photocatalysts, involving doping, metal loading, and compositing [15-25]. In particular, many studies have been conducted to prove that defects, especially oxygen vacancies, are the most reactive sites on the catalyst surface [26]. In addition, the photo-response range can be expanded by the generation of oxygen vacancies that could narrow the band gap by formation of oxygen-vacancy states located within the band gap. Moreover, oxygen defects could also serve as photoinduced charge traps to prevent electron-hole recombination and adsorption sites where the charges were transferred to adsorbed species [27]. Thus, the introduction of oxygen defects in oxide semiconductors should be conducive to improvement in visible photocatalytic activity.

To further enhance the visible light photocatalytic activity of BiOI, various modification methods such as metal deposition or doping [28-31] are applied. Integration of nanoscale plasmonic metals into photocatalysts has been utilized as an effective approach to construct visible-light-induced plasmonic composite photocatalysts [32]. Compared with noble metals such as Au or Ag, non-noble metals such as bismuth (Bi) have significant advantages of high efficiency, low cost, easy availability, and facile synthesis. UV and visible-light active semi-metal Bi with surface plasmon resonance (SPR) from the collective oscillation of its surface electrons [33, 34] enables hot carriers to transfer from the plasmonic metal to BiOI, thus enhancing the charge carrier separation of semiconductor composites [22, 35, 36].

Recently, Dong et al. [37] found that the SPR effect and oxygen defect of the semiconductor photocatalysts can significantly improve the photocatalytic performance. However, the synergistic effect of SPR and the multiple intermediate levels of energy excited by oxygen defects have not been revealed, which inspired the construction of heterojunctions with SPR and oxygen defects, simultaneously, to achieve dramatically enhanced photocatalytic performance. BiOI is a typical semiconductor photocatalyst, while pristine BiOI undergoes limited visible light photocatalytic activity. In addition, it is appealing to explore the mechanism of the synergistic integration of elemental Bi and defects for promoting the photocatalysis efficiency of BiOI.

In the present study, metallic Bi was deposited in situ on BiOI nanosheets by the reduction of partial Bi3+ on the surface of BiOI along with the creation of oxygen defects. Further experimental and theoretical investigations confirmed that the obtained catalysts consisted of BiOI phase, elemental Bi phase, and oxygen defects. The synergy effect of metallic Bi and oxygen defects could cause BiOI to be highly active under visible irradiation for NO removal. The detailed mechanisms for the synergistic integration of metallic Bi and defects on BiOI under visible light irradiation were proposed based on in situ DRIFTS, EPR, and DFT calculations. The conversion pathway of photocatalytic NO oxidation was also revealed. The present work could provide a new strategy for the development of high-performance photocatalysts and the understanding of the gas-phase reaction mechanisms for environmental and energetic applications.

2 Experimental
2.1 Sample preparation

The chemical reagents used in this experiment were analytical grade. The preparation process is as follows: 4 mmol (1.949 g) of bismuth nitrate (Bi(NO3)3·5H2O) and 25 mL of distilled water were added in a 50-mL beaker and kept stirring for 30 min to dissolve. Then, 4 mmol (0.664 g) of KI was dissolved in distilled water (10 mL) and added to bismuth nitrate solution and kept stirring for 30 min. The mixture was aged in the water bath under 80 ℃ for 2 h. After the precipitate was cooled to room temperature, it was washed (twice with water and twice with ethanol and dried at 55 ℃ to obtain BiOI. Then, the prepared BiOI sample (2 mmol) was added into 20-mL distilled water and kept stirring for 20 min. At the same time, the NaBH4 solution was prepared by adding NaBH4 solid (0.038, 0.076, 0.113, and 0.189 g) into 40-mL distilled water. The NaBH4 solution was dropped into the BiOI suspension and kept stirring for 20 min. The obtained sample was washed twice with water and twice with ethanol to obtain the final products, labeled Bi/BiOI-1, Bi/BiOI-2, Bi/BiOI-3, and Bi/BiOI-5.

2.2 Characterization

The crystal structure of the samples was analyzed by X-ray diffraction with Cu Kα (XRD, Model D/Max RA, Rigaku Co., Japan). An X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS, Thermo ESCALAB 250, USA) analyzed the chemical composition of the samples. A scanning electron microscope (SEM, JEOL Model JSM-6490, Japan) characterized the morphology of the samples. A N2 adsorption-desorption instrument (ASAP 2020, USA) measured the specific surface area (BET) and pore structure of the samples. UV-vis DRS (UV2550, Shimadzu) and photoluminescence spectra (PL, F-7000, Hitachi, Japan) were utilized to analyze the optical properties of the samples. The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements of the samples were performed at –196 ℃ (FLsp920, England). Electron spin resonance (ESR) spectra of radicals that were spin-trapped using 5, 5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-n-oxide (DMPO) was employed to verify the formation of superoxide (•O2) and hydroxyl radicals (•OH).

2.3 Evaluation of visible light activity

The photocatalytic activity was evaluated by monitoring the NO concentration in a continuous stream reactor at room temperature. From the prepared sample, 0.1 g was ultrasonically dispersed in a 12-mm diameter glass disk and dried at 60 ℃. After natural cooling, the mixture was placed in a rectangular reactor with a capacity of 4.5 L (30 cm × 15 cm × 10 cm), covered with a layer of quartz glass, and a 150-W commercial halogen tungsten lamp placed 20 cm above the reactor. For visible light catalytic activity tests, filters were used to remove light with wavelengths less than 420 nm from the beam. A low concentration of NO was prepared using standard air and NO standard gases with an original concentration of 100 ppm. The air flow rate was 2.4 L/min and the NO gas flow rate was 15 mL/min. The air flow and the NO gas stream were mixed by means of a three-way valve to obtain an initial concentration of 600 ppb of NO. The diluted NO was passed into the reactor, the NO concentration was stabilized, and the lamp was turned on. The NOx analyzer (Thermo Scientific, 42i-TL, USA) was sampled every 1 min and the concentrations of NO, NO2, and NOx (NO + NO2) were recorded. The removal ratio (η) of NO can be calculated as η = (1 − C/C0) × 100%, in which C represents the NO concentration at the outlet of the reactor after turning on the lamp and C0 represents the NO concentration when the adsorption-desorption equilibrium is reached before turning on the lamp.

2.4 DFT calculations

Spin-polarized DFT-D2 [38] calculations were carried out utilizing the "Vienna ab initio simulation package" (code VASP5.4) [39, 40], using a universal gradient correlation function [41]. A plane-wave basis set with energy cut off at 400 eV within the framework of the projector-augmented wave method was adopted. The Gaussian smearing width was set to 0.2 eV [42, 43]. The Brillouin zone was sampled at 3 × 3 × 1 K points. All atoms were allowed to converge to 0.01 eV Å−1. A 12 × 8 × 18 supercell of BiOI, including 24 oxygen atoms, 18 bismuth atoms, and 12 I atoms was employed. Then, 10 Bi atoms were supported on the surface of BiOI [44, 45].

2.5 In situ DRIFTS investigation on photocatalytic NO oxidation

In situ infrared test equipment was composed of a Tensor Ⅱ FTIR spectrometer (Bruker) and in situ reflection reaction (Fig. 1). The catalyst was loaded in the reaction chamber. The real-time FT-IR spectrum after heat treatment was utilized as background. Because of the detection sensitivity of the in situ FT-IR measurement, the concentration in the activity test (ppb level) is too low to be detected. Therefore, 50 ppm of NO was introduced into the reactor. The reaction gas (50 mL/min NO, 50 mL/min O2) was then passed into the reaction chamber. After 20 min of adsorption, the catalyst was irradiated with visible light for 20 min. During the process of adsorption and reaction, the IR spectrum data were recorded every 2 min. From the infrared scanning range of 4000–600 cm−1, 2200–800 cm−1 can be used to analyze the process of Bi-BiOI adsorption and photocatalytic oxidation of NO.

Fig. 1. Scheme of the in situ FT-IR apparatus equipped with a visible light source.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Phase and composition

Fig. 2 shows the XRD patterns of BiOI and Bi/BiOI-X (X = 1, 2, 3, 5). It can be observed that the diffraction peaks of BiOI belong to tetragonal phase BiOI (JCPDS-ICDD Card No. 10-0445). With the increased addition of the NaBH4 reductant, the diffraction peaks of the Bi element (JCPDS-ICDD Card No. 44-1246) begin to appear and the intensity is gradually intensified. These results indicate that part of the Bi3+ in BiOI is in situ reduced to elemental Bi by NaBH4 in the solvent thermal treatment process. The metallic Bi content is increased with increasing reductant quantity. The decrease in the diffraction intensity of Bi/BiOI-X can be ascribed to the partial transformation of BiOI to metallic Bi.

Fig. 2. XRD patterns of Bi/BiOI-X (X = 1, 2, 3, 5).

Fig. 3(a) shows the XPS spectra of the samples, which indicate that elemental Bi, O, C, and I are contained on the surface of Bi/BiOI. Fig. 3(b) shows that the binding energy at 164.5 eV (Bi 4f5/2) and 159.2 eV (Bi 4f7/2) can be attributed to Bi3+ [46], and the binding energy of 161.9 eV (Bi 4f5/2) and 156.8 eV (Bi 4f7/2) belong to elemental Bi [27, 47]. According to the XPS results, the molar ratio of metallic Bi is 2.12%. This result is consistent with the XRD results, further confirming that elemental Bi is formed when the reductant is used. In Fig. 3(c), two dominant peaks located at 630.9 and 619.5 eV can be assigned to I 3d. In Fig. 3d, the peak at 530.3 eV belongs to the Bi–O bond [48, 49].

Fig. 3. XPS spectra for BiOI, Bi/BiOI-2, and Bi/BiOI-2 after sputtering. (a) Survey; (b) Bi 4f; (c) I 3d; (d) O 1s.
3.2 Morphology and structure

Figs. 4(a) and 4(b) show the SEM images of BiOI and Bi/BiOI-2. Fig. 4(a) shows that BiOI is composed by stacked nanosheets. It can be clearly observed from Fig. 4(b) that Bi/BiOI-2 is hierarchically assembled by nanosheets, forming a superstructure. Fig. 4(c) shows that the self-assembled Bi/BiOI has a sponge-like 3D stereostructure. The TEM image (Fig. 4(d)) further demonstrates that Bi/BiOI is self-assembled by thin-layer nanosheets. Figs. 4(e) and 4(f) show the HRTEM image of a single nanosheet. The lattice spacing (0.152 and 0.099 nm) can be observed, corresponding to the (0 0 6) crystal plane of BiOI and the (0 0 12) plane of Bi [50, 51].

Fig. 4. SEM images of (a) BiOI and (b, c) Bi/BiOI-2; (d) TEM image of Bi/BiOI-2; HRTEM images of (e) BiOI and (f) Bi/BiOI-2.

Figs. 5(a) and 5(b) show the N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and corresponding pore sizes of BiOI and Bi/BiOI-X. According to the Brunauer-Deming-Deming-Teller (BDDT) classification, the above samples belong to isotherm Ⅳ, indicating the presence of mesopores in the sample (Fig. 5(a)). The hysteresis loop of the adsorption-desorption isotherms can be classified as H3 (classified by IUPAC), indicating the presence of fractured pores from the stacking of nanosheets, consistent with SEM results (Fig. 4). From the pore-size distribution curve (Fig. 5(b)), the pore sizes of the samples BiOI and Bi/BiOI-X are all located at 2 to 100 nm, which further confirms the formation of mesoporous/microporous structure (2–100 nm). As the reductant quantity is increased to 2 mmol, the hierarchical stacking of nanosheets accounts for the formation of large pores and enlarged specific surface areas. Table 1 shows the specific surface area and pore volume of the samples; they were increased from 2.3–7.2 m2/g and 0.007–0.043 cm3/g, respectively, as the reductant quantity was increased to 2 mmol. However, when more than 2 mmol was used, the specific surface area and pore size of the samples were slightly reduced.

Fig. 5. (a) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and (b) pore-size distribution curves of BiOI and Bi/BiOI-X (X = 1, 2, 3, 5).
Table 1
Surface area, pore parameter, and NO removal ratio of the samples.
3.3 Light absorption and the effect of oxygen vacancy

Fig. 6(a) displays the UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra of BiOI and Bi/BiOI-X. We can observe that the BiOI already shows extended light absorption up to 650 nm. Furthermore, the band gap of the BiOI estimated from the intercept of the tangent to the (αhν)1/2 vs. photoenergy (Fig. 6(b)) plot is 1.80 eV, which causes BiOI to easily absorb visible light in a wide range. Solid-state EPR spectra are recorded to demonstrate the existence of the oxygen vacancies. As shown in Fig. 6(c), BiOI has a strong signal peak at g = 2.001 in the dark, which is attributable to the existence of oxygen vacancies [52, 53]. At the same time, the signals of Bi/BiOI-2 become stronger, indicating the increased production of oxygen vacancies. The production of oxygen vacancies in BiOI can be ascribed to the reductive effect of NaBH4 [40]. Under visible light irradiation, the intensity of the EPR signal on BiOI and Bi/BiOI-X is enhanced, indicating higher electron mobility and lower electron recombination rates [54, 55]. The density of states (DOS) of intrinsic BiOI and defective BiOI (Fig. 6(d)) are calculated to further reveal the role of oxygen vacancies. Significant intermediate levels appeared under the conduction band of the BiOI, implying that the oxygen vacancies contribute to the formation of multiple intermediate levels, which could promote electron transition from the valence band (VB) to conduction band (CB) through intermediate levels under visible light irradiation [28, 56]. With the increase in reductant quantity, the reduction ability of NaBH4 is enhanced, and thus, a greater amount of elemental Bi and oxygen vacancies is produced [57-59]. As a result, Bi/BiOI-X exhibits full absorption in the visible region owing to the SPR effect of elemental Bi, consistent with the change in color of the sample from brick-red to black [18, 20, 28].

Fig. 6. (a) UV-vis DRS of BiOI and Bi/BiOI-X; (b) Band gap determination; (c) EPR spectra of BiOI and Bi/BiOI-2; (d) Density of states (DOS) of BiOI and BiOI with oxygen vacancies (OV-BiOI).
3.4 Charge carrier separation and highly enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity

Fig. 7(a) shows the photoluminescence (PL) spectra for all the samples. The PL intensity of Bi/BiOI-X is significantly lower than that of BiOI, because elemental Bi in Bi/BiOI-X induces the electromagnetic field through the SPR effect, which could promote the separation of photogenerated charge carriers [60]. Fig. 7b shows the visible light photocatalytic NO removal ratio by BiOI and Bi/BiOI-X under visible light. BiOI exhibits little NO removal ratio after 30-min irradiation because of rapid recombination of photogenerated charge carriers [61, 62]. When the reductant quantity is increased from 1 to 5 mmol, the NO removal ratio of Bi/BiOI-2 is increased to 40.8%, which is much more efficient than that of BiOI (5.0%) without 3D structure [28]. Although Bi/BiOI-1 has a higher BET surface area, the electronic structure of Bi/BiOI-1 has not been fully optimized; therefore, it does not exhibit higher photocatalytic performance. The highly enhanced visible light photocatalysis of Bi/BiOI-2 can be ascribed to the synergistic effects of oxygen vacancies and metallic Bi. On the one hand, oxygen vacancies favor the transition of electrons from the valence band to an intermediate level and then to the conduction band under visible light irradiation [28, 56]. Multiple intermediate levels can be conducive to the transition of electrons and the separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs (Fig. 7(a)). On the other hand, the SPR effect of elemental Bi can improve visible light absorption efficiency (Fig. 6(a)) and promote the separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs. Bi/BiOI-2 exhibits strong light absorption and higher photogenerated charge separation efficiency. However, the specific surface area decreased and visible light photocatalytic performance declined when more than 2 mmol of reductant NaBH4 was added, through the collapse of the sponge-like 3D structure of Bi/BiOI-X.

Fig. 7. (a) PL spectra of Bi/BiOI-X (X = 1, 2, 3, 5); (b) Visible light photocatalytic activity for NO removal.
3.5 Electron delivery and photocatalysis mechanism

To further recover the vital roles of elemental Bi in Bi/BiOI-2, we used the DFT to calculate the electronic structure of the catalysts. Fig. 8(a) shows the charge difference distribution of elemental Bi on BiOI. Blue and yellow stand for charge accumulation and depletion, respectively. Evidently, the Bi-O layer of BiOI obtains the electrons from elemental Bi and becomes the photo-active sites. The electronic location function (ELF) (Fig. 8(b)) demonstrates the existence of a strong covalent interaction between the elemental Bi and the Bi-O layer, forming a channel for hot electrons of elemental Bi to be transferred from metallic Bi to BiOI. To explore how the excited electrons of Bi can be easily transferred to the Bi-O layer, the potentials of Bi/BiOI and BiOI were calculated. As is shown in Fig. 8(c), the potential of elemental Bi is higher than that of the Bi-O layer. The energy barrier between the Bi layer and Bi-O layer is 17.80 eV. Charge transfer from the Bi layer to Bi-O layer is easier than the transfer from the Bi-O layer to Bi layer. Under visible light irradiation, excited hot electrons from elemental Bi can easily cross the barrier and transfer to the adjacent Bi-O layer. From another aspect, we calculate the density of states (DOS) of Bi/BiOI and BiOI (Figs. 8(d) and 8€) and the partial density of state (PDOS) of elemental Bi (Fig. 8(f)). Clearly, the valence-band maximum (VBM) of Bi/BiOI is significantly extended by the contribution of the orbital from elemental Bi. This may be ascribed to the SPR effect of elemental Bi, driving the electrons of BiOI to a higher excited state to accumulate at the VBM [63]. This is beneficial for promoting the generation of photogenerated charge carriers.

Fig. 8. (a) Charge difference distribution between Bi atoms and Bi-O layers of Bi/BiOI (charge accumulation is in blue and depletion is in yellow); (b) Electronic location function (ELF); (c) Electrostatic potential; (d) Density of state of Bi/BiOI; (e) Density of state of BiOI; (f) Projected density of states (PDOS) of Bi atom in elemental Bi layers.

Fig. 9(a) shows the hydroxyl radical (•OH) and superoxide radical (•O2) signals in BiOI and Bi/BiOI-2, which is produced from water oxidation by electron-holes and oxygen reduced by free electrons. The •OH and • O2 signals of Bi/BiOI-2 are higher than that of pure BiOI because of enhanced charge separation and transfer. The increased production of reactive radicals is responsible for the highly enhanced photocatalytic activity of Bi/BiOI. Notwithstanding the amount of radical production, the band structure and optical absorption of Bi/BiOI-2 have been improved by oxygen vacancy and metallic Bi. Thus, the photocatalytic performance of Bi/BiOI-2 is significantly higher than that of BiOI.

Fig. 9. ESR spectra of (a) hydroxyl radicals and (b) superoxide radicals of BiOI and Bi/BiOI-2.

Based on various experimental and theoretical results, the corresponding photocatalytic mechanism of metallic Bi@defective BiOI was proposed as shown in Fig. 10. The oxygen vacancies in BiOI induce the formation of multiple intermediate levels (Fig. 6(d)), allowing direct transition from VB to intermediate levels under visible light irradiation. This also enhances defective BiOI with visible photocatalytic activity, because the electrons from the intermediate levels can be further excited to the CB of BiOI.

Fig. 10. Mechanism of plasmonic photocatalysis on Bi/BiOI-2.

Moreover, the introduction of elemental Bi in BiOI exerts a significant promotion effect on the photocatalytic performance in visible light (Fig. 7(b)). First, the SPR effect of elemental Bi produces an electromagnetic field and promotes defective BiOI with electrons in a higher excited state, accumulating at the VBM, which facilitate the separation of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs. Next, the hot electrons of elemental Bi transfer to the Bi-O layer, and the electrons from the intermediate levels transfer to elemental Bi simultaneously to maintain neutrality of elemental Bi, promoting the electron-hole pair separation of BiOI and radical production. Hence, by in situ reduction of Bi3+ to elemental Bi and the creation of defects on the hierarchical microsheet structure of BiOI, photocatalytic performance can be significantly improved.

3.6 In situ FT-IR investigation on the photocatalytic reaction mechanism

Fig. 11 displays the in situ FT-IR spectra of NO adsorption in the dark and photocatalytic reaction processes on the surface of Bi/BiOI-2 under visible light irradiation. Table 2 summarizes the assignment of the corresponding absorption bands. Under dark conditions, the absorption peak of nitrates (1048 cm−1) is noted after adsorption equilibrium. This could be attributed to oxygen vacancies in BiOI, which activate adsorbed O2 to form superoxide radical • O2, oxidizing the NO to nitrates [64]. A proposed workable mechanism of NO adsorption is illustrated in Scheme 1.

Fig. 11. In situ FT-IR spectra of photocatalytic NO oxidation process over Bi/BiOI-2 under visible light irradiation.
Table 2
Assignments of the IR bands observed during photocatalytic NO oxidation processes over Bi/BiOI-2 under visible light irradiation.
Scheme 1. A possible mechanism of NO adsorption on Bi/BiOI-2.

After visible light irradiation, enhanced absorption bands of the NO2 polymer (N2O4), nitrites (at 1174 and 1327 cm−1), and nitrates (at 809, 841, 1000, 1015, 1048, 1445, and 1482 cm−1) can be detected. This is indicative of the active species generated under visible light, which induces the photocatalytic NO oxidation, consistent with the transient decrease in NO concentration under visible light for the fi ~2 min in Fig. 7(c). As the photocatalytic reaction progresses, the absorption peaks of different forms of nitrites and nitrates are generated, which may be originated from the NO adsorbed at diverse locations on the surface of the photocatalyst (as shown in Scheme 2). In addition, nitrites and nitrates tend to be oxidized to the more stable state by superoxo species [65]. Hence, the absorption peak at 1015 cm−1 (bidentate NO3) gradually shifts to 1000 cm−1 (bridging NO3) with illumination time (as shown in Scheme 3) [68-72].

Scheme 2. A possible mechanism of photocatalytic NO oxidation on Bi/BiOI-2.
Scheme 3. A possible mechanism of nitrates oxidation on Bi/BiOI-2.
4 Conclusions

The plasmonic metallic Bi@defective BiOI with 3D hierarchal structure was constructed by reduction of partial Bi3+ in BiOI. The photocatalytic removal of NO through visible light on plasmonic metallic Bi@defective BiOI was greatly improved. This is primarily attributed to the synergistic effects of oxygen vacancies and metallic Bi. The electrons from the valence band tend to accumulate at vacancies as well as intermediate levels so that the increasing charge density would cause oxygen accumulated at those sites to easily form superoxide radicals and hydroxyl radicals, which are the main active species that oxidize NO into final products. The surface plasmon resonance effect of elemental Bi enables the improvement in visible light absorption efficiency and the promotion of the charge carriers. The reaction process of photocatalytic NO oxidation was systematically studied by in situ FT-IR. NO was adsorbed on the surface of photocatalysts at different locations and would be oxidized to produce diverse forms of nitrite and nitrate. Combining DFT calculations and the reaction process, the relevant reaction mechanism of photocatalytic NO oxidation on metallic Bi@defective BiOI was proposed involving the synergistic roles of multiple intermediate levels excited by oxygen defects and metallic Bi. This study provides a new method to understand the photocatalytic reaction mechanism of heterojunction photocatalyst composites by elemental semi-metals and semiconductors, as well as the mechanisms of the SPR effect and multiple intermediate levels in cooperatively enhancing photocatalytic performance.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the AM-HPC in Suzhou, China for computational support.

References
[1]
L. Zhang, W. Wang, J. Yang, Z. Chen, W. Zhang, L. Zhou, S. Liu, Appl. Catal. A, 2006, 308, 105-110. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2006.04.016
[2]
W. Cui, J. Li, Y. Sun, H. Wang, G. Jiang, S. C. Lee, F. Dong, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 237, 938-946. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.06.071
[3]
Z. Ni, W. Zhang, G. Jiang, X. Wang, Z. Lu, Y. Sun, X. Li, Y. Zhang, F. Dong, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 1174-1183. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62849-3
[4]
Z. Y. Jiang, X. H. Liang, H. L. Zheng, Y. Y. Liu, Z. Y. Wang, P. Wang, X. Y. Zhang, X. Y. Qin, Y. Dai, M. H. Wangbo, B. B. Huang, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 219, 209-215. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.023
[5]
H. Liu, H. T. Ma, X. Z. Li, W. Z. Li, M. Wu, X. H. Bao, Chemosphere, 2003, 50, 39-46. DOI:10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00486-1
[6]
G. Tian, Y. Chen, W. Zhou, K. Pan, Y. Dong, C. Tian, H. Fu, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 887-892. DOI:10.1039/C0JM03040F
[7]
J. Bi, L. Wu, J. Li, Z. Li, X. Wang, X. Fu, Acta Mater., 2007, 55, 4699-4705. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2007.04.034
[8]
L. Zhang, T. Xu, X. Zhao, Y. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B, 2010, 98, 138-146. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.05.022
[9]
H. Cheng, B. Huang, K. Yang, Z. Wang, X. Qin, X. Zhang, Y. Dai, ChemPhysChem, 2010, 11, 2167-2173. DOI:10.1002/cphc.v11:10
[10]
L. Y. Ding, R. J. Wei, H. Chen, J. C. Hu, J. L. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 172-173, 91-99. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.02.019
[11]
W. Zhang, X. Liu, X. Dong, F. Dong, Y. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 2030-2038. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62941-3
[12]
A. Luz, C. Feldmann, Solid State Sci., 2011, 13, 1017-1021. DOI:10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2011.01.028
[13]
J. Li, X. Dong, Y. Sun, W. Cen, F. Dong, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 226, 269-277. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.057
[14]
Y. Sun, X. Xiao, X. Dong, F. Dong, W. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 217-226. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62753-0
[15]
Y. Huang, D. Zhu, Q. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Cao, Z. Shen, W. Ho, S. C. Lee, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 234, 70-78. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.04.039
[16]
M. Ou, F. Dong, W. Zhang, Z. Wu, Chem. Eng. J., 2014, 255, 650-658. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.086
[17]
P. Chen, F. Dong, M. Ran, J. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 619-629. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63029-3
[18]
Z. Wang, Y. Huang, L. Chen, M. Chen, J. Cao, W. Ho, S. C. Lee, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 972-981. DOI:10.1039/C7TA09132J
[19]
F. Dong, T. Xiong, Y. Sun, Z. Zhao, Y. Zhou, X. Feng, Z. Wu, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 10386-10389. DOI:10.1039/C4CC02724H
[20]
Z. Zhao, W. Zhang, X. Lv, Y. Sun, F. Dong, Y. Zhang, Environ. Sci. Nano, 2016, 3, 1306-1317. DOI:10.1039/C6EN00341A
[21]
Y. Huang, Y. Gao, Q. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. Cao, W. Ho, S. C. Lee, J. Hazard. Mater., 2018, 354, 54-62. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.04.071
[22]
F. Dong, Q. Li, Y. Sun, W. K. Ho, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 4341-4350. DOI:10.1021/cs501038q
[23]
H. Wang, Y. Sun, G. Jiang, Y. Zhang, H. Huang, Z. Wu, S. C. Lee, F. Dong, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2018, 52, 479-1487.
[24]
C. Chang, L. Zhu, Y. Fu, X. Chu, Chem. Eng. J., 2013, 233, 305-314. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2013.08.048
[25]
M. Chen, J. Yao, Y. Huang, H. Gong, W. Chu, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 334, 453-461. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.064
[26]
F. Dong, T. Xiong, S. Yan, H. Wang, Y. Sun, Y. Zhang, H. Huang, Z. Wu, J. Catal., 2016, 344, 401-410. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2016.10.005
[27]
F. Dong, T. Xiong, Y. Sun, H. Huang, Z. Wu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 18466-18474. DOI:10.1039/C5TA05099E
[28]
M. Long, P. D. Hu, H. D. Wu, J. Cai, B. H. Tan, B. X. Zhou, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 184, 20-27. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.11.025
[29]
Y. Yu, C. Cao, H. Liu, P. Li, F. Wei, Y. Jiang, W. Song, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 1677-1681. DOI:10.1039/C3TA14494A
[30]
T. Xiong, H. Huang, Y. Sun, F. Dong, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 6118-6127. DOI:10.1039/C5TA00103J
[31]
F. Dong, Y. Sun, M. Fu, W. K. Ho, S. C. Lee, Z. Wu, Langmuir, 2012, 28, 766-773. DOI:10.1021/la202752q
[32]
X. Wang, C. Liow, D. Qi, B. Zhu, W. R. Leow, H. Wang, C. Xue, X. Chen, S. Li, Adv. Mater., 2014, 26, 3506-3512. DOI:10.1002/adma.v26.21
[33]
J. Toudert, R. Serna, M. J. Castro, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 20530-20539. DOI:10.1021/jp3065882
[34]
J. M. Mc Mahon, G. C. Schatz, S. K. Gray, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15, 5415-5423. DOI:10.1039/C3CP43856B
[35]
F. Dong, Z. Zhao, Y. Sun, Y. Zhang, S. Yan, Z. Wu, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2015, 49, 12432-12440. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.5b03758
[36]
S. Linic, P. Christopher, H. Xin, A. Marimuthu, Acc. Chem. Res., 2013, 46, 1890-1899. DOI:10.1021/ar3002393
[37]
H. Wang, W. Zhang, X. Li, J. Li, W. Cen, Q. Li, F. Dong, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 225, 218-227. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.11.079
[38]
H. Nakai, J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, J. Comput. Chem. Jpn., 2006, 5, 7-18. DOI:10.2477/jccj.5.7
[39]
G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Comput. Mater. Sci., 1996, 6, 15-50. DOI:10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0
[40]
G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. B, 1996, 54, 11169-11186. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169
[41]
J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, 77, 3865-3868. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
[42]
P. E. Bloechl, Phys. Rev. B, 1994, 50, 17953-17979. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953
[43]
G. Kresse, D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B, 1999, 59, 1758-1775.
[44]
S. K. Bhatia, A. L. Myers, Langmuir, 2006, 22, 1688-1700. DOI:10.1021/la0523816
[45]
R. C. Lochan, M. Head-Gordon, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2006, 8, 1357-1370. DOI:10.1039/b515409j
[46]
J. Jiang, L. Zhang, H. Li, W. He, J. J. Yin, Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 10573-10581. DOI:10.1039/c3nr03597b
[47]
Y. Fujimoto, in: M. Grishin ed., Advances in Solid-State Lasers: Development and Applications, Intech, 2010, Chapter 2, 25-44.
[48]
F. Dong, Y. Sun, M. Fu, Z. Wu, S. C. Lee, J. Hazard. Mater., 2012, 26, 219-220.
[49]
Z. Ai, W. Ho, S. Lee, L. Zhang, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2009, 43, 4143-4150. DOI:10.1021/es9004366
[50]
X. Xiao, W. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 5866-5870. DOI:10.1039/c0jm00333f
[51]
L. Ye, J. Chen, L. Tian, J. Liu, T. Peng, K. Deng, L. Zan, Appl. Catal. B, 2013, 130-131, 1-7. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.10.011
[52]
I. Nakamura, N. Negishi, S. Kutsuna, T. Ihara, S. Sugihara, K. Takeuchi, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2000, 161, 205-212. DOI:10.1016/S1381-1169(00)00362-9
[53]
L. Ye, L. Zan, L. Tian, T. Peng, J. Zhang, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 6951-6953. DOI:10.1039/c1cc11015b
[54]
Z. Diwu, J. W. Lown, Free Radic. Biol. Med., 1993, 14, 209-215. DOI:10.1016/0891-5849(93)90012-J
[55]
M. Ikeya, Nature, 1975, 255, 48-50. DOI:10.1038/255048a0
[56]
T. Stauber, N. M. R. Peres, F. Guinea, Phys. Rev. B, 2007, 76, 205423/1-205423/10.
[57]
J. Ke, J. Liu, H. Sun, H. Zhang, X. Duan, P. Liang, X. Li, M. O. Tade, S. Liu, S. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 200, 47-55. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.06.071
[58]
Q. Zhao, Y. Ren, X. Li, Y. Shi, Mater. Res. Bull., 2016, 83, 396-399. DOI:10.1016/j.materresbull.2016.06.031
[59]
F. Zhang, X. Li, Q. Zhao, A. Chen, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120, 19113-19123. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03618
[60]
Y. Sun, Z. Zhao, F. Dong, W. Zhang, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 10383-10390. DOI:10.1039/C4CP06045H
[61]
G. L. Huang, Y. Zhu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, 11952-11958. DOI:10.1021/jp071987v
[62]
R. Shi, G. Huang, J. Lin, Y. Zhu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 19633-19638. DOI:10.1021/jp906680e
[63]
H. Li, J. Shang, H. Zhu, Z. Yang, Z. Ai, L. Zhang, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 8276-8285. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b02613
[64]
J. Li, S. Yin, F. Dong, W. Cen, Y. Chu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 19861-19869. DOI:10.1021/acsami.7b04026
[65]
K. I. Hadjiivanov, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 2000, 42, 71-144. DOI:10.1081/CR-100100260
[66]
J. C. S. Wu, Y. T. Cheng, J. Catal., 2006, 237, 393-404. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2005.11.023
[67]
L. Zhong, Y. Yu, W. Cai, X. Geng, Q. Zhong, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 15036-15045. DOI:10.1039/C5CP00896D
[68]
N. Tang, Y. Liu, H. Wang, Z. Wu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 8214-8220. DOI:10.1021/jp200920z
[69]
J. Laane, J. R. Ohlsen, Prog. Inorg. Chem., 1980, 27, 465-513.
[70]
K. Hadjiivanov, V. Avreyska, D. Klissurski, T. Marinova, Langmuir, 2002, 18, 1619-1625. DOI:10.1021/la0110895
[71]
J. Valyon, W. K. Hall, J. Phys. Chem., 1993, 97, 1204-1212. DOI:10.1021/j100108a016
[72]
X. Feng, W. Zhang, Y. Sun, H. Huang, F. Dong, Environ. Sci. Nano, 2017, 4, 604-612. DOI:10.1039/C6EN00637J