催化学报  2019, Vol. 40 Issue (10): 1408-1420      DOI: S1872-2067(19)63399-1   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Jingwei Huang
Pengfei Yue
Lei Wang
Houde She
Qizhao Wang
A review on tungsten-trioxide-based photoanodes for water oxidation
Jingwei Huanga,b, Pengfei Yuea, Lei Wanga, Houde Shea, Qizhao Wanga,c,d     
a. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Research Center of Gansu Military and Civilian Integration Advanced Structural Materials, Gansu International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Water-Retention Chemical Functional Materials, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China;
b. Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Environmental Catalysis and Pollution Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Institute of Environmental Health and Pollution Control, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, China;
c. Key Laboratory for Photonic and Electronic Bandgap Materials, Ministry of Education, School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, Heilongjiang, China;
d. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China
* Corresponding author. Qizhao Wang, Tel/Fax: +86-931-7972677; E-mail: wangqizhao@163.com, qizhaosjtu@gmail.com
Abstract: Photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting capable of reducing and oxidizing water into hydrogen and oxygen in a generation mode of spatial separation has gained extensive popularity. In order to effectively produce hydrogen at the photocathode of a PEC cell, the photoanode, where the oxygen evolution reaction occurs, should be systematically developed on priority. In particular, WO3 has been identified as one of the most promising photoanode materials owing to its narrow band gap and high valence band position. Its practical implementation, however, is still limited by excessive electron-hole recombination and poor water oxidation kinetics. This review presents the various strategies that have been studied for enhancing the PEC water oxidation performance of WO3, such as controlling the morphology, introducing defects, constructing a heterojunction, loading a cocatalyst, and exploiting the plasmonic effect. In addition, the possible future research directions are presented.
© 2019, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: WO3 photoanode    Water splitting    Defect    Heterojunction    Cocatalyst    
基于三氧化钨的光阳极水氧化综述
黄静伟a,b, 岳彭飞a, 王磊a, 佘厚德a, 王其召a,c,d     
a. 西北师范大学化学化工学院, 甘肃省军民融合先进结构材料研究中心, 保水化学功能材料甘肃省国际科技合作基地, 甘肃兰州 730070;
b. 广东工业大学环境科学与工程学院, 环境健康与污染控制研究院, 广州市环境催化与健康风险控制重点实验室, 广东广州 510006;
c. 哈尔滨师范大学物理与电子工程学院, 光电带隙材料省部共建教育部重点实验室, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150025;
d. 长安大学环境科学与工程学院, 陕西西安 710064
摘要:光电催化水分解技术可以在分离的空间内分别进行水的还原和氧化反应生成氢气和氧气,是一种高效的光能到氢能的转换技术,因而受到研究者的广泛关注.光电催化水分解过程中,阳极上发生的水氧化反应是一个四电子转移过程,是水分解反应的限速步骤.为了提高光电催化水分解中阴极的产氢效率,应当优先提高阳极上的水氧化反应效率.在众多的光阳极中,三氧化钨由于其带隙窄和价带位置高而成为理想的光阳极材料之一.尽管如此,三氧化钨阳极的实际应用受到光生电子和空穴的严重复合以及电极表面缓慢反应动力学的限制.本文详细介绍了三氧化钨材料作为光阳极用于光电催化水氧化反应的优缺点,并从形貌控制、构造缺陷、构建异质结、负载助催化剂及应用等离子体效应等方面对提高三氧化钨阳极水氧化性能进行了综述.通过形貌控制可以增大电极的比表面积或降低材料的厚度,有利于光生电荷迁移到电极表面;在三氧化钨上引入适量的化学缺陷可以提供大量的反应位点,有利于光生电荷的传输;通过构建异质结可以有效促进三氧化钨电极内的光生电荷分离,提高整个复合电极的光吸收效率.如果构建异质结的另一种材料本身也是一种水氧化助催化剂,那么该材料可以起到分离光生电荷和提高表面催化效率的双重作用;负载助催化剂可以提高三氧化钨电极表面的反应活性,进而提高到达电极表面的光生电荷利用效率,得到提高的光电流和降低的起始电位;在三氧化钨电极上负载具有等离子效应的金属(如贵金属金、银等)可以提高电极的光电转换效率.光电催化水分解包含光的吸收、光生电荷分离和分离的光生电荷参与反应三个过程.只有当这三个过程的效率同时得到提高时,光电催化水分解的效率才能达到最高.尽管本文介绍的这些措施都可以提高三氧化钨电极的性能,但这些措施往往局限于从一个方面来提高电极性能.在未来的研究中,可以通过提高反应中的上述两个或三个过程的效率来实现三氧化钨电极更高的光电催化水氧化性能.
关键词三氧化钨光阳极    水分解    缺陷    异质结    助催化剂    

1 Introduction

The population of the earth was 7.7 billion at the end of 2018, which is expected to reach 9.5 billion by 2050 [1]. With such rapid growth in the population and the advancement of society, the need for energy will become larger and larger. Fossil energy as a non-renewable energy source is currently widely used. However, it cannot meet the continuous demand for energy over the next one or two hundred years. At the same time, the massive use of fossil energy has brought about a series of environmental pollution problems. Therefore, it is urgent to find new clean energy sources.

The radiant power of the sun at the earth's surface is as high as 105 TW, which is far higher than the human demand for energy [2]. Therefore, solar energy can meet the energy needs if the conversion efficiency can be increased to 10% [3]. Converting solar energy into storable and transportable chemical energy is a viable method of developing and utilizing solar energy on a large scale, owing to the discontinuity and instability of the solar energy resource. Photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting can convert solar energy to clean hydrogen energy, which is a promising way of utilizing solar energy [4]. PEC water splitting was first reported by Fujishima and Honda in 1972 [5], subsequently, it has been studied extensively. A photoanode and a photocathode are necessary to construct a PEC water splitting system. The water oxidation reaction taking place at the photoanode is usually considered as the kinetic-controlling step because it involves four-electron transfer. Therefore, developing a high-performance photoanode is crucial to constructing an effective PEC water splitting system.

In order to realize large-scale high-efficiency PEC water splitting, the photoelectrodes need to satisfy the following conditions: (1) substantial amount of visible light must be absorbed; (2) it must display appropriate band alignments for water oxidation and reduction; and (3) it should be chemically stable and low cost. As an n-type semiconductor for the photoanode, WO3 can meet the above requirements. Its valence band position is about 3 V vs. NHE, which can provide enough overpotential to oxidize H2O to form O2 [6]. Furthermore, WO3, with the band gap of 2.6 eV, can absorb part of the visible light spectrum. Therefore, WO3 has been identified as one of the most promising photoanode materials (as shown in Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Diagrammatic sketch of WO3 for PEC water splitting.

WO3 is a kind of yellow solid at room temperature that is stable in acidic solutions. As shown in Fig. 2(a), WO3 exhibits the ABO3 perovskite structure, in which the element A is missing and the element B is W [7, 8]. W is in the middle of the octahedron, whereas O is at the apex of the octahedron; each octahedron is connected by O points. However, actually prepared WO3 reveals the structure of a distorted octahedron owing to antiferroelectric displacements of the W atoms and mutual rotations of the O octahedra. Pure WO3 exhibits at least five phases (α, β, γ, δ, and ε) in the range 900 to 180 ℃, depending on the temperature [9-13]. In addition, orthorhombic [11] and hexagonal [14] phases were also reported, as shown in Fig. 2(b). The energy band structures of these phases were calculated by using a simplified model, shown in Fig. 2(c) [15].

Fig. 2. (a) Cubic perovskite crystal structure of WO3 (reprinted with permission from ref. [7]; copyright 1999 The American Physical Society). (b) Unit cells and (c) band structures of the different phases of WO3 (Reprinted with permission from ref. [15]; copyright 2010 AIP Publishing Group).

In 1976, WO3 was first reported as a photoanode for PEC water splitting [16]. However, the efficiencies of unmodified WO3 photoanodes for water oxidation widely differ from their theoretical values because of excessive electron-hole recombination and poor water oxidation kinetics. In addition, the surface states of nano-WO3 that originate from W-O dangling bonds or defects can also limit the water oxidation performance of WO3 photoelectrode [17, 18]. Furthermore, side reactions take place on the WO3 photoanode owing to its high valence band position, leading to low Faradic efficiencies (normally lower than 80%) of water oxidation on WO3 photoanode [19, 20]. The anions (e.g., Cl, SO42−) in the solution, which are present as supporting electrolytes, can interfere with the photooxidation of water [21]. Therefore, various strategies have been reported to optimize the WO3 photoanode. Herein, an overview of the recently reported strategies, such as controlling the morphology, introducing defects, constructing a heterojunction, loading a cocatalyst, and using the plasmonic effect, will be provided.

2 Strategies for improving the PEC water splitting performance of WO3
2.1 Controlling the morphology of WO3

Commonly, semiconductors with the morphologies of nanowire, nanoflake, and mesoporous are beneficial for the transfer of photogenerated holes from the bulk to the surface. Solvothermal technique was used by Grimes et al. [22] to grow WO3 nanowire arrays on F-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrates, as shown in Fig. 3(a). This nanowire array morphology can be changed to two types of nanoflake arrays (Fig. 3(b) and (c)) by adjusting the solvothermal conditions. The study showed that the second type of nanoflake arrays (Fig. 3(c)) exhibited the best performance for PEC water oxidation, which resulted in the highest saturation photocurrent value of 1.43 mA/cm2. The high performance was ascribed to the greater thickness of the second-type nanoflake arrays, because WO3 is an indirect band gap semiconductor with a small light absorption coefficient and, therefore, greater thickness benefits light absorption. Although the first type of nanoflake arrays displayed almost the same thickness as that of the nanowires, these arrays exhibited a greater photocurrent density than that of the nanowires owing to the smaller band gaps and lower light scattering. The nanosheet structure was also synthesized by Zheng et al. [23] and other research groups [24-27] by using a similar method to confirm its good performance. Dense WO3 nanosheets can also vertically grow on W substrate for PEC water splitting [28-30]. The WO3 nanosheet prepared by this method displayed a low PEC water oxidation overpotential.

Fig. 3. FESEM images of unannealed WO3. (a) Nanowire, (b) first type of nanoflake arrays, and (c) second type of nanoflake arrays. The insets show the cross sections of the films. Reprinted with permission from ref. [22]. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society.

Recently, Kafizas et al. [31] fabricated a nanoneedle-structured WO3 photoanode by a chemical vapor deposition method. This WO3 photoanode was composed of a seed layer and a top layer of WO3 nanoneedles. The WO3 photoanode with a ∼300 nm seed layer and ∼5 μm thick nanoneedles showed the highest water splitting activity. WO3 nanotubes and nanowires could also be synthesized by flame vapor deposition [32, 33] and other methods [34, 35].

Thin layer semitransparent WO3 electrodes were prepared on conductive FTO substrates by using a one-step sol-gel method [36]. By employing a higher annealing temperature of 700 ℃, the photocurrent could reach 4.2 mA/cm2 under simulated solar AM 1.5G irradiation. A thinner transparent WO3 thin film can be prepared with the assistance of polyvinylpyrrolidone and ammonium metatungstate by using spin coating and screen printing methods [37]. This kind of transparent WO3 thin film could be a potential candidate for use in tandem configurations for water splitting application. Surfactant-thermal-carbonization method was used to synthesize a tunable mesoporous WO3 electrode by Yagi and coworkers [38]. Another morphology such as a mesoporous thin film WO3 photoanode can be fabricated by a sol-gel dip coating approach [39] or foaming-assisted electrospinning strategy [40]. These structures showed improved solar energy conversion efficiencies. Pore-rich WO3 is beneficial for the utilization of the photogenerated holes in water oxidation [41]. Unusual sandwich-structured WO3 nanoplate arrays [42] were also fabricated for PEC water splitting. All these well-designed photoanodes display higher PEC water oxidation performances owing to a high surface area or small thickness, which facilitates easy transport of charge carriers to the surfaces.

2.2 Introducing defects

Defects in materials can act as active sites in catalytic applications [43-47]. Hütter et al. [48] reported the effects of physical defects, such as microsized holes or cracks, and chemical defects, such as oxygen vacancies, on the PEC water splitting performance of WO3. The results showed that physical defects inside the film increased the resistance to charge transfer and also resulted in a higher recombination rate, which inhibited the photocurrent generation. Chemical defects yielded an increased adsorption of OH groups on the film surface and enhanced the PEC efficiency. Excess of the chemical defects also inhibited the electron transfer, thus decreasing the photocurrent generation. Dual O and W vacancies on the surface of WO3 were generated by dissolving ethylenediamine solution with Li, as shown in Fig. 4 [49]. The WO3 surrounded by a defective overlayer exhibited a photocurrent density that was approximately 2.4 times higher and a marked cathodic shift in the onset potential for water oxidation. Similar work was carried out by Lee et al. [50], who employed acid-mediated hydrothermal treatment. The transfer ability of the charge carriers can be enhanced by the O vacancies present in WO3 [20, 51, 52].

Fig. 4. HRTEM images of WO3 with treatment times of (a) 0 s, (b) 10 s, (c) 20 s, and (d) 40 s. The insets show the fast Fourier transform diffraction patterns of the crystallographic parts. Reprinted with permission from ref. [49]. Copyright 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Self-doped WO3−x nanoflake arrays could be synthesized by the serial process of dealloying of amorphous Fe-W alloy, thermal treatment, and cathodic polarization [53]. It was found that the optimized WO3−x showed a photocurrent density of 8.7 mA/cm2 in the presence of methanol as a hole scavenger, which was five times larger than that of pristine WO3 nanoflakes.

2.3 Constructing a heterojunction

Construction of a heterojunction is considered to be an effective method of improving the separation efficiency of the photogenerated charges or sometimes increasing the light absorption efficiency [54-62]. Herein, the combination of WO3 with another semiconductor as the photoanode for PEC water oxidation is reviewed.

2.3.1 WO3/TiO2 heterojunction

TiO2 is a widely used photocatalyst [63-68]. It has the advantage of being stable and low cost. Coupling TiO2 with WO3 to form a WO3/TiO2 heterojunction photoanode is reported to improve the PEC water splitting performance. Ludwig et al. [69] reported the preparation of layered WO3/TiO2 films by magnetron sputtering. Various structures of WO3/TiO2 films could be prepared by adjusting the sputtering pressures and depositing the films in the form of wedges. The porous WO3/TiO2 photoanode showed significantly enhanced photocurrent densities, compared to those of individual TiO2 and WO3. The authors thought that the enhancement in the photoconversion efficiency was attributed to an increased surface area and efficient charge transfer within the layered nanostructures. Subsequently, more research on WO3/TiO2 heterostructure for water splitting [70] or photodegradation [71, 72] has been carried out and reported. Recently, the charge transfer mechanism in the WO3/TiO2 heterostructure for PEC water splitting was deeply studied [73-75]. A hole scavenger was used to realize effective charge separation at the heterojunction during the PEC tests. With Ni meso-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin as a water oxidation catalyst that was loaded on WO3/TiO2 heterostructure, the water oxidation efficiency could reach 81% [76].

2.3.2 WO3/BiVO4 heterojunction

BiVO4 with the band gap of 2.4-2.6 eV and a suitable band structure has gained considerable attention in the field of photocatalysis [77, 78]. Nosaka et al. [79] reported the deposition of a layer of BiVO4 on WO3 by spin coating to form WO3/BiVO4 heterostructure. The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) of the WO3/BiVO4 electrode increased by ten times, compared to that of BiVO4 electrode. The enhanced performance of the WO3/BiVO4 composite film electrode was mainly ascribed to the effective electron-hole separation at the semiconductor heterojunction. Subsequently, Grimes' team [80] reported the deposition of a BiVO4 layer on WO3 nanorods by spin coating. They found that the heterojunction structure offered an enhanced photoconversion efficiency and increased photocorrosion stability. Furthermore, the nanorod array films showed significantly improved PEC properties, compared to those of planar WO3/BiVO4 heterojunction films. The authors believed that the improved PEC properties could be ascribed to the high surface area and improved separation of the photogenerated charge carriers at the WO3/BiVO4 interface. These results were further confirmed by the subsequent work of Zheng and coworkers. They synthesized WO3/BiVO4 core/shell nanowire photoanode, in which BiVO4 was the primary light-absorber and WO3 acted as an electron conductor (Fig. 5) [81]. At a potential of 1.23 V vs. RHE, the photocurrent of 3.1 mA/cm2 under simulated sunlight and an IPCE of ∼60% at 300−450 nm were obtained. In addition, Pihosh and coworkers fabricated well-separated and vertically oriented WO3 nanorods capped with extremely thin BiVO4 absorber layers for photocatalytic water oxidation [82]. The optimized WO3/BiVO4 photoanode modified with Co-Pi oxygen evolution cocatalyst showed remarkably stable photocurrents of 3.2 and 5.1 mA/cm2 at 1.23 V vs. RHE in stable Na2SO4 electrolyte under simulated solar light at the standard 1 Sun and concentrated 2 Suns illuminations, respectively.

Fig. 5. WO3/BiVO4 core/shell nanowire (NW) photoanode. (a) Schematic of the structure and the energy band diagram of the core/shell NWs; (b, c) SEM (left) and TEM (right) images of bare WO3 NW array and WO3/BiVO4 core/shell NWs. Reprinted with permission from ref. [81]. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society.

Recently, Yu and coworkers [83] reported WO3/BiVO4 spherical arrays for highly efficient PEC water splitting. The nanojunction, the W doping, and the O vacancies in the WO3/BiVO4 spherical array structure were believed to enhance the light harvesting efficiency through multiple light scattering and enhanced charge separation and transfer efficiencies. With the loading of cobalt phosphate, the 3D WO3/BiVO4/cobalt phosphate composites yielded a significantly improved PEC performance [84]. Further research demonstrated that the formation of a heterojunction between WO3 and BiVO4 could improve the PEC water splitting performance of WO3 [85-90]

The dynamics of the photogenerated charge carriers in the WO3/BiVO4 heterojunction photoanode have been widely studied [91]. Research on charge separation showed that WO3/BiVO4 interfacial engineering was the preferred choice for improving the overall PEC activity [92] and that the separation in WO3/BiVO4 was wavelength-dependent [93]. Selli and coworkers [94] probed the photoinduced charge transfer dynamics of WO3/BiVO4 photoanodes through midinfrared transient absorption spectroscopy. Nanosecond midinfrared transient absorption experiments confirmed that charge carrier separation occurs in WO3/BiVO4 electrodes under visible-light excitation that persists up to the microsecond time scale.

2.3.3 WO3/Fe2O3 heterojunction

Fe2O3 has a narrow band gap of about 2.1 eV, which suggests that it can absorb a large proportion of visible light. In addition, it offers the merits of excellent stability, abundance, and low cost [95, 96]. Zou's group [97, 98] prepared WO3/Fe2O3 heterostructure for PEC water oxidation by the sol-gel method. The results showed that the photocurrent of the WO3/Fe2O3 film was higher than that of WO3 or Fe2O3 alone. The authors believed that a reasonable explanation for this could be that the photogenerated electrons transferred more easily in WO3/Fe2O3 than in WO3 or Fe2O3 owing to their unique conduction band structures. Therefore, the interface between WO3 and Fe2O3 played an important role in improving the conversion efficiency. Subsequently, researchers deposited a thin layer of Fe2O3 nanoparticles on WO3 by CVD to fabricate host-guest electrodes [99], which showed 20% increase in the photocurrent. The improvement was attributed to an increase in the absorbed photon conversion efficiency, especially for longer wavelengths, for which the photon penetration depth was large in hematite. Later, Diao and coworkers [100] reported the fabrication of WO3 nanoneedle/α-Fe2O3 heterojunction photoanodes for efficient PEC water splitting. In this heterojunction, the high-aspect-ratio single crystalline WO3 nanoneedles acted as both the photoanode framework and the light harvester in the UV and blue visible regions, while the porous layer of small Fe2O3 nanocrystals acted as a cooperative light harvester in the visible region. The WO3/Fe2O3 heterojunction photoanode exhibited an extended light absorption band in the visible region and a significantly enhanced photocurrent density, which was ca. 1.6 times higher than that obtained for pure WO3 NNs. Recently, NiFe-layered double hydroxide was decorated on the WO3/Fe2O3 heterostructure to further improve its photocurrent density [101]. As shown in Fig. 6, the Ni2+ in the NiFe-layered double hydroxide was oxidized by the photogenerated holes to Ni4+, which in turn oxidized water and reduced back to Ni2+.

Fig. 6. Catalytic cycle of water oxidation at an integrated photoanode. Reprinted with permission from ref. [101]. Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.
2.3.4 WO3/carbon quantum dots (CQDs) heterojunction

Recently, CQDs have attracted broad attention for photocatalysis application owing to the characteristics of stable photoluminescence and absorption in the UV and near-visible regions [102]. WO3 nanoplate-decorated CQDs were successfully synthesized by Zheng and coworkers [103]. A WO3 photoanode loaded with CQDs exhibited an enhanced photocurrent density under simulated solar light illumination. Simultaneously, the WO3/CQDs photoanode showed strong visible light absorption. Meanwhile, the WO3/CQDs photoanode revealed a low onset potential owing to changes in the band energy positions. The schematic of the process is shown in Fig. 7; WO3 and CQDs are excited by the incident light to generate electrons and holes. These carriers are easily separated because of the staggered energy band positions, which facilitate the transfer of electrons and holes and thereby improve the PEC performance.

Fig. 7. Schematic diagram of CQDs/WO3 composite in a PEC system. Reprinted with permission from ref. [103]. Copyright 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Further research revealed that the enhancement in the efficiency in the case of WO3/CQDs was ascribed to the increased light harvesting ability of the CQDs and the accelerated charge transfer across the interface between the WO3/CQDs electrode and the electrolyte [104, 105].

In addition to these above mentioned heterojunction structures, WO3/Sb2S3 heterojunction [106], BiVO4/WO3/SnO2 double-heterojunction [107], WO3/Cu2O heterojunction [108], WO3/CuO heterojunction [109], WO3/ZnWO4 heterojunction [110], WO3/CuWO4 heterojunction [34, 111, 112], WO3/Cr2O3 heterojunction [113], WO3/conducting polymer heterojunction [114], and rGO-WO3 composite [115] were fabricated for enhanced PEC water oxidation.

2.4 Loading a cocatalyst

Both heterogeneous and homogeneous cocatalysts have been extensively studied for the photocatalytic [116-124] and photoelectrocatalytic [125-132] water splitting process.

2.4.1 Loading a heterogeneous cocatalyst

To improve the stability of WO3 in aqueous solutions with pH > 4, Wang and coworkers coated WO3 with a Mn-based catalyst, which was prepared by thermally decomposing the Brudvig-Crabtree catalyst [(H2O)-(terpy)Mn(O)2Mn(H2O)(terpy)] (NO3)3 (terpy = 2, 2':6', 2''-terpyridine) [133]. As shown in Fig. 8, the photogenerated holes transferred to the Mn catalyst, assisted by the formation of an electric field within the semiconductor. Then, the Mn catalyst was oxidized to a higher valence state, which oxidized water.

Fig. 8. Proposed working mechanism of WO3/Mn catalyst system. Reprinted with permission from ref. [133]. Copyright 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

The Mn catalyst could act as a protective layer that maintained the stability of WO3. WO3 coated with Mn catalyst could produce more O2 than WO3 without the Mn catalyst. After 2 h, the performance of the WO3 electrode with the Mn catalyst decreased by approximately 4%, whereas that of the WO3 electrode without the catalyst dropped by 60% within 1 h. This is the first study that reports that WO3 is stable in neutral solutions.

Choi's group [134] loaded Co-Pi onto WO3 and studied its PEC water oxidation performance. The loading of Co-Pi increased the oxygen evolution Faradaic efficiency from 61% to nearly 100% at 0.8 V vs Ag/AgCl. Co-Pi could suppress the formation of peroxides, resulting in long-term stability of the WO3/Co-Pi photoanode. In addition, Zhou's research group [135] loaded Co-Pi on WO3 by photo-assisted electrodeposition. In this research, Co-Pi facilitated charge transfer through the formation of a junction between WO3 and Co-Pi.

Spurgeon et al. [136] supported IrO2 on WO3 by sintering, sputtering, drop coating, and electrodeposition. The authors found that the coverage of the cocatalysts had a great influence on the performance of the WO3/IrO2 photoanode. Sputtering was the most effective method for loading IrO2; therefore, it showed the largest photocurrent density. The WO3/IrO2 photoanode prepared by sputtering displayed the greatly increased Faradaic oxygen production efficiency of 100%.

He and coworkers [137] reported the electrochemical deposition of NiFe-LDH decorated WO3 nanorod arrays as PEC oxygen evolution electrodes. Fig. 9 exhibits the typical morphology of the obtained WO3@NiFe-LDH nanorod arrays. When the deposition time is 200 s, full coverage of the ultrathin NiFe-LDH on the WO3 nanorod arrays can be observed. A shorter deposition time leads to a smaller amount of NiFe-LDH nanoflakes that do not cover the surface of the WO3 nanorod arrays (Fig. 9a), whereas a longer deposition time results in thicker NiFe-LDH nanoflakes (Fig. 9(c)). The WO3/NiFe-LDH electrode displays a lower onset potential for water oxidation than WO3 and a higher photocurrent density. After optimization, the WO3/NiFe-LDH electrode reveals an enhanced higher photocurrent density of 1.10 mA/cm2 at the potential of 1.20 V vs. SCE. The authors thought that the promising performance was attributed to WO3 providing a superior framework of photoanodes as well as to the prospective light harvesting property.

Fig. 9. SEM images of the WO3@NiFe-LDH nanorod arrays obtained after various electrodeposition durations. (a) 50 s, (b) 200 s, and (c) 400 s. (d) TEM and HRTEM images of WO3@NiFe-LDH-200s. (e) Corresponding maps of WO3@NiFe-LDH-200s. Reprinted with permission from ref. [137]. Copyright 2016 Elsevier.

Ding's group [138] coated WO3 with a thin FeOOH layer by photodeposition for PEC water oxidation. The WO3/FeOOH anode displayed longer stability than the WO3 anode owing to the protective effect of the FeOOH layer. Furthermore, as an excellent water oxidation catalyst, FeOOH improved the photocurrent of the WO3 anode, which was 1.3 mA/cm2 at 1.23 V RHE under simulated solar illumination. The authors found that a p-n junction was formed between WO3 and FeOOH due to solvation effect that facilitated the transfer of the photogenerated carriers and thereby improved the PEC performance. FeOOH was also used to improve the performance of the WO3 photoanode in a tandem water splitting device [139]. The similar CoOOH-loaded WO3 photoanode also showed enhanced photoelectrocatalytic activity [140].

Recently, Li and coworkers [141] reported FeOOH and NiOOH co-deposited nanotube array-like WO3 (WA) photoanode (WA-FeNi) for PEC water splitting. As shown in Fig. 10(a), FeOOH could reduce the recombination rate of the photogenerated carriers at the interface between WO3 and NiOOH, whereas NiOOH decreased the recombination between NiOOH and the electrolyte and increased the water oxidation activity significantly.

Fig. 10. (a) Illustration of the overall PEC water splitting involving WA-FeNi (reprinted with permission from ref. [141]; copyright 2018 American Chemical Society). (b) The proposed photogenerated charge transport process and the process of water oxidation on CoOx/WO3 anode (reprinted with permission from ref. [142]; copyright 2016 Elsevier).

CoOx nanoparticles are known to be an excellent water oxidation catalyst [143-146]. Li and coworkers [142] reported the deposition of CoOx nanoparticles on the surface of WO3 plate arrays by chemical deposition method. The CoOx/WO3 film showed enhanced PEC performance, compared to that of a bare WO3 film. The highest IPCE increased from 24.9% to 49.1% when CoOx was introduced. The proposed process is presented in Fig. 10b. Upon illumination, WO3 is excited to produce electrons and holes. Then, the Co in CoOx is oxidized by the holes to Co4+, which in turn oxidizes water and is reduced back to Co2+. The electrons subsequently transfer to the cathode under an applied bias to reduce the protons.

Ding's group [147] also reported on the loading of CoOx nanoparticles on WO3 nanosheets for PEC water oxidation. CoOx nanoparticles with the diameter of about 5 nm were loaded on WO3 nanosheets by using hydrothermal method. Upon loading the CoOx nanoparticles, the WO3 photoanode showed improved charge separation efficiency and charge injection efficiency owing to the formation of a p-n junction between WO3 and CoOx and the excellent catalytic performance of CoOx nanoparticles. Rotating ring-disk electrode system test results indicated that the selectivity towards the water oxidation reaction was enhanced. With the loading of the CoOx nanoparticles, water was oxidized to O2, rather than to H2O2, which improved the stability of the WO3 photoanode.

2.4.2 Loading a homogeneous cocatalyst

Homogeneous cocatalysts can also accelerate the water oxidation reaction [148-156]. Bartlett's group [157] reported the loading of Fe(tebppmcn)Cl2 (tebppmcn = tetraethyl N, N′-bis(2-methylpyridyl-4-phosphonate)-N, N′-dimethylcyclohexyldiamine) (1) with a phosphonate linkage to the WO3 photoelectrode. The loading of 1 dramatically increased the rate of PEC water oxidation. At the same time, the selectivity of WO3 for water oxidation increased from 56% to 79%.

Ma et al. [158] reported that bpy-Co2+ complex (bpy = 4, 4′-bipyridine) can be used as an efficient molecular catalyst to modify WO3 nanoplate array photoanode. An enhanced photocurrent density of 2.88 mA/cm2 at 1.5 V vs. RHE could be realized with the modified photoanode, which was 1.7 times larger than that of the WO3 photoanode. The Ir complex [(H4dphbpy)Ir(Cp*)Cl]Cl (Ir-PO3H2; H4dphbpy = 2, 2′-bipyridine-4, 4′-bisphosphonic acid, Cp* = pentamethylcyclopentadiene) was also reported to enhance the interfacial charge transfer in the WO3 photoanode through the formation of the composite of WO3 + Ir-PO3H2 [159]. This WO3 composite photoanode showed significant improvements in both the photocurrent and Faradaic efficiency, compared to those of the bare WO3 photoanode.

2.5 Using plasmonic effect

Plasmonic effect has been extensively introduced in the solar water splitting field in recent years [160-168]. Photoelectrodes with plasmonic effect usually combine a semiconductor with noble metal nanoparticles, which exhibit a strong surface plasmon resonance, for improving the photo-to-chemical conversion efficiency. Augustynski's group [169] reported on the loading of Ag nanoparticles to enhance the photocurrent of WO3 for PEC water oxidation. This early research confirmed that the photo-to-chemical conversion efficiency and photocurrent of WO3 photoanode could be improved by loading plasmonic Ag nanoparticles. Thereafter, Diao's group [165] reported the loading of Au nanoparticles on WO3 photoanode. The Au/WO3 photoanode exhibited a significantly improved photoactivity toward PEC water oxidation. Not only the saturation photocurrent density increased, but also a negatively shifted onset potential could be observed. Other similar works yielded the same conclusion [170-172].

A comparison of the performances, including the photocurrent density and stability time, is presented in Table 1.

Table 1
Comparison of WO3-based photoanodes for PEC water splitting.
3 Summary and outlook

In this review, we summarized a list of strategies aimed at improving the performance of WO3-based photoanodes in PEC water splitting. As mentioned in the text, the inherent flaws of the pristine WO3 photoanode suggest that it requires appropriate modifications for improved water oxidation performances, which include controlling the scale of WO3 to the nanoscale range, which can shorten the transmission route of the photogenerated holes, introducing chemical defects into WO3, which can supply ample active sites and thereby promote charge transfer, and forming a heterojunction with another semiconductor to efficaciously suppress the recombination of the photogenerated charge carriers. In some cases, the employed semiconductor may serve as a water oxidation catalyst as well; loading cocatalysts can increase the photocurrent and simultaneously reduce the onset potential by promoting the charge transfer and consumption in surface reactions. Cooperation with metal particles exhibiting plasmonic effect can also enhance the photo-to-chemical conversion efficiency.

Generally, the PEC water splitting process involves three steps: light absorption, photogenerated charge carrier separation, and reactions on the electrodes involving these carriers. Only when the efficiencies of all the three steps are improved concurrently can a PEC cell display optimal performance. Although several attempts have been made to improve the PEC water splitting performance of WO3 photoanode, these studies have mainly focused on one step of the PEC water splitting process. Fully taking into account two or three steps of the process can improve the PEC water splitting to a higher level in future studies.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21808189, 21663027), the Science and Technology Support Project of Gansu Province (1504GKCA027), the Program for Innovative Research Team (NWNULKQN-15-2), the Opening Project of Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Environmental Catalysis and Pollution Control (GKLECPC-12), and the Opening Project of Key Laboratory of Green Catalysis of Sichuan Institutes of High Education (LYJ18205).

References
[1]
[2]
T. Hisatomi, J. Kubota, K. Domen, Chem. Soc. Rev, 2014, 43, 7520-7535. DOI:10.1039/C3CS60378D
[3]
M. Grätzel, Nature, 2001, 414, 338-344. DOI:10.1038/35104607
[4]
Z. Wang, L. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 369-378. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62998-X
[5]
A. Fujishima, K. Honda, Nature, 1972, 238, 37-38. DOI:10.1038/238037a0
[6]
S. Corby, L. Francàs, S. Selim, M. Sachs, C. Blackman, A. Kafizas, J. R. Durrant, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 16168-16177. DOI:10.1021/jacs.8b08852
[7]
G. A. de Wijs, P. K. de Boer, R. A. de Groot, G. Kresse, J. Mater. Chem. A, 1999, 59, 2684-2693.
[8]
M. D. Bhatt, J. S. Lee, Mater J.. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 10632-10659. DOI:10.1039/C5TA00257E
[9]
P. M. Woodward, A. W. Sleight, T. Vogt, J. Solid State Chem., 1997, 131, 9-17. DOI:10.1006/jssc.1997.7268
[10]
R. Diehl, G. Brandt, E. Salje, Acta Crystallogr. B, 1978, 34, 1105-1111. DOI:10.1107/S0567740878005014
[11]
T. Vogt, P. M. Woodward, B. A. Hunter, J. Solid State Chem., 1999, 144, 209-215. DOI:10.1006/jssc.1999.8173
[12]
E. Salje, Acta Crystallogr. B, 1977, 33, 574-577. DOI:10.1107/S0567740877004130
[13]
W. L. Kehl, R. G. Hay, D. Wahl, J. Appl. Phys., 1952, 23, 212-215. DOI:10.1063/1.1702176
[14]
B. Gerand, G. Nowogrocki, J. Guenot, M. Figlarz, J. Solid State Chem., 1979, 29, 429-434. DOI:10.1016/0022-4596(79)90199-3
[15]
D. B. Migas, V. L. Shaposhnikov, V. N. Rodin, V. E. Borisenko, Nature, 2010, 108, 093713. DOI:10.1063/1.3505688
[16]
G. Hodes, D. Cahen, J. Manassen, Nature, 1976, 260, 312-313. DOI:10.1038/260312a0
[17]
W. Kim, T. Tachikawa, D. Monllor-Satoca, H.-I. Kim, T. Majima, W. Choi, Energy Environ. Sci., 2013, 6, 3732-3739. DOI:10.1039/c3ee42151a
[18]
M. Yang, H. He, H. Zhang, X. Zhong, F. Dong, G. Ke, Y. Chen, J. Du, Y. Zhou, Electrochim. Acta, 2018, 283, 871-881. DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.056
[19]
K. Fuku, N. Wang, Y. Miseki, T. Funaki, K. Sayama, ChemSusChem, 2015, 8, 1593-1600. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201403463
[20]
J. Zhang, X. Chang, C. Li, A. Li, S. Liu, T. Wang, J. Gong, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 3350-3354. DOI:10.1039/C7TA10056F
[21]
J. C. Hill, K.-S. Choi, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 7612-7620. DOI:10.1021/jp209909b
[22]
J. Su, X. Feng, J. D. Sloppy, L. Guo, C. A. Grimes, Nano Lett., 2011, 11, 203-208. DOI:10.1021/nl1034573
[23]
W. Li, P. Da, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Lin, X. Gong, G. Zheng, ACS Nano, 2014, 8, 11770-11777. DOI:10.1021/nn5053684
[24]
S. Wang, H. Chen, G. Gao, T. Butburee, M. Lyu, S. Thaweesak, J.-H. Yun, A. Du, G. Liu, L. Wang, Nano Energy, 2016, 24, 94-102. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.010
[25]
W. Shi, H. Li, J. Chen, X. Lv, Y. Shen, Electrochim. Acta, 2017, 225, 473-481. DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.166
[26]
R. M. Fernández-Domene, R. Sánchez-Tovar, B. Lucas-Granados, G. Roselló-Márquez, J. García-Antón, Mater. Design, 2017, 116, 160-170. DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.016
[27]
W. Li, C. Liu, Y. Yang, J. Li, Q. Chen, F. Liu, Mater. Lett., 2012, 84, 41-43. DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2012.06.022
[28]
Q. Chen, J. Li, B. Zhou, M. Long, H. Chen, Y. Liu, W. Cai, W. Shangguan, Electrochem. Commun., 2012, 20, 153-156. DOI:10.1016/j.elecom.2012.03.043
[29]
Q. Zeng, J. Li, J. Bai, X. Li, L. Xia, B. Zhou, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 202, 388-396. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.045
[30]
D. D. Qin, C. L. Tao, S. A. Friesen, T. H. Wang, O. K. Varghese, N. Z. Bao, Z. Y. Yang, T. E. Mallouk, C. A. Grimes, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 729-731. DOI:10.1039/C1CC15691H
[31]
A. Kafizas, L. Francàs, C. Sotelo-Vazquez, M. Ling, Y. Li, E. Glover, L. McCafferty, C. Blackman, J. Darr, I. Parkin, Proc. Combust. Inst., 2017, 121, 5983-5993.
[32]
P. M. Rao, I. S. Cho, X. Zheng, Proc. Combust. Inst., 2013, 34, 2187-2195. DOI:10.1016/j.proci.2012.06.122
[33]
P. M. Rao, X. Zheng, Proc. Combust. Inst., 2011, 33, 1891-1898. DOI:10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.071
[34]
F. Zheng, M. Zhang, M. Guo, Thin Solid Films, 2013, 534, 45-53. DOI:10.1016/j.tsf.2013.01.102
[35]
L. Li, X. Zhao, D. Pan, G. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 2132-2140. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62948-6
[36]
A. Jelinska, K. Bienkowski, M. Jadwiszczak, M. Pisarek, M. Strawski, D. Kurzydlowski, R. Solarska, J. Augustynski, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 10573-10580. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.8b03497
[37]
G. H. Go, P. S. Shinde, C. H. Doh, W. J. Lee, Mater. Design, 2016, 90, 1005-1009. DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2015.11.042
[38]
D. Chandra, K. Saito, T. Yui, M. Yagi, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 16838-16846. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b04166
[39]
S. Hilliard, G. Baldinozzi, D. Friedrich, S. Kressman, H. Strub, V. Artero, C. Laberty-Robert, Sustain. Energy Fuels, 2017, 1, 145-153. DOI:10.1039/C6SE00001K
[40]
K. Song, F. Gao, W. Yang, E. Wang, Z. Wang, H. Hou, ChemElectroChem, 2018, 5, 322-327. DOI:10.1002/celc.201700993
[41]
Y. Liu, L. Liang, C. Xiao, X. Hua, Z. Li, B. Pan, Y. Xie, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 6, 1600437. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201600437
[42]
X. Feng, Y. Chen, Z. Qin, M. Wang, L. Guo, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8, 18089-18096. DOI:10.1021/acsami.6b04887
[43]
L. Zhuang, L. Ge, Y. Yang, M. Li, Y. Jia, X. Yao, Z. Zhu, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 29, 1606793. DOI:10.1002/adma.201606793
[44]
D. Yan, Y. Li, J. Huo, R. Chen, L. Dai, S. Wang, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1606459. DOI:10.1002/adma.201606459
[45]
J. Zheng, Y. Lyu, R. Wang, C. Xie, H. Zhou, S.P. Jiang, S. Wang, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 3572. DOI:10.1038/s41467-018-05580-z
[46]
C. Shi, X. Dong, X. Wang, H. Ma, X. Zhang, Chin. Catal J.., 2018, 39, 128-137. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62990-5
[47]
K. Qi, S.-Y. Liu, M. Qiu, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 867-875. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62999-1
[48]
Y. Zhao, S. Balasubramanyam, R. Sinha, R. Lavrijsen, M. A. Verheijen, A. A. Bol, A. Bieberle-Hütter, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2018, 1, 5887-5895. DOI:10.1021/acsaem.8b00849
[49]
M. Ma, K. Zhang, P. Li, M. S. Jung, M. J. Jeong, J. H. Park, Angew. Chem., 2016, 128, 11998-12002. DOI:10.1002/ange.201605247
[50]
T. Soltani, A. Tayyebi, H. Hong, M. H. Mirfasih, B.-K. Lee, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2019, 191, 39-49. DOI:10.1016/j.solmat.2018.10.019
[51]
R. Zhang, F. Ning, S. Xu, L. Zhou, M. Shao, M. Wei, Electrochim. Acta, 2018, 274, 217-223. DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.109
[52]
T. Singh, R. Müller, J. Singh, S. Mathur, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 347, 448-453. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.04.126
[53]
S. Q. Yu, Y. H. Ling, J. Zhang, F. Qin, Z. J. Zhang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42, 20879-20887. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.177
[54]
F. Chen, H. Huang, L. Ye, T. Zhang, Y. Zhang, X. Han, T. Ma, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 28, 1804284. DOI:10.1002/adfm.201804284
[55]
F. Li, J. Li, F. Li, L. Gao, X. Long, Y. Hu, C. Wang, S. Wei, J. Jin, J. Ma, Mater J.. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 13412-13418. DOI:10.1039/C8TA05194A
[56]
T. A. Pham, Y. Ping, G. Galli, Nat. Mater., 2017, 16, 401-408. DOI:10.1038/nmat4803
[57]
M. Qureshi, K. Takanabe, Chem. Mater., 2017, 29, 158-167. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02907
[58]
H. Huang, K. Xiao, Y. He, T. Zhang, F. Dong, X. Du, Y. Zhang, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 199, 75-86. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.06.020
[59]
C. Zhou, A. L. Wang, W. Xiao, D. Chao, X. Zhang, N. H. Tiep, S. Chen, J. Kang, X. Wang, J. Ding, J. Wang, H. Zhang, H. J. Fan, ACS Catal., 2018, 30, 1705516. DOI:10.1002/adma.201705516
[60]
A. P. Singh, N. Kodan, B. R. Mehta, A. Held, L. Mayrhofer, M. Moseler, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 5311-5318. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b00956
[61]
H. Huang, X. Han, X. Li, S. Wang, P. K. Chu, Y. Zhang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7, 482-492. DOI:10.1021/am5065409
[62]
B. Chai, C. Liu, C. Wang, J. Yan, Z. Ren, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 2067-2075. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62981-4
[63]
S. Kment, F. Riboni, S. Pausova, L. Wang, L. Wang, H. Han, Z. Hubicka, J. Krysa, P. Schmuki, R. Zboril, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 3716-3769. DOI:10.1039/C6CS00015K
[64]
A. Kafizas, Y. Ma, E. Pastor, S. R. Pendlebury, C. Mesa, L. Francàs, F. Le Formal, N. Noor, M. Ling, C. Sotelo-Vazquez, C. J. Carmalt, I. P. Parkin, J. R. Durrant, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 4896-4903. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.7b01150
[65]
S. M. H. Hejazi, J. Aghazadeh Mohandesi, M. Javanbakht, Sol. Energy, 2017, 144, 699-706. DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2016.11.033
[66]
X. Li, J.-L. Shi, H. Hao, X. Lang, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 232, 260-267. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.03.043
[67]
X. Zhou, N. Liu, P. Schmuki, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 3210-3235. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b03709
[68]
H. Yu, W. Liu, X. Wang, F. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 225, 415-423. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.026
[69]
C. Khare, K. Sliozberg, R. Meyer, A. Savan, W. Schuhmann, A. Ludwig, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38, 15954-15964. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.142
[70]
W. Sun, D. Wang, Z. U. Rahman, N. Wei, S. Chen, J. Alloys Compd., 2017, 695, 2154-2159. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.061
[71]
A. A. Ismail, I. Abdelfattah, A. Helal, S. A. Al-Sayari, L. Robben, D. W. Bahnemann, J. Hazard. Mater., 2016, 307, 43-54. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.041
[72]
J. Mioduska, A. Zielinska-Jurek, M. Janczarek, J. Hupka, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A, 2016, 2016, 3145912.
[73]
I. A. Castro, G. Byzynski, M. Dawson, C. Ribeiro, Photochem J.. Photobiol. A, 2017, 339, 95-102. DOI:10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.02.024
[74]
C. Sotelo-Vazquez, R. Quesada-Cabrera, M. Ling, D. O. Scanlon, A. Kafizas, P. K. Thakur, T.-L. Lee, A. Taylor, G. W. Watson, R. G. Palgrave, J. R. Durrant, C. S. Blackman, I. P. Parkin, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 27, 1605413. DOI:10.1002/adfm.201605413
[75]
S. Meng, W. Sun, S. Zhang, X. Zheng, X. Fu, S. Chen, Phys J.. Chem. C, 2018, 122, 26326-26336. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b07524
[76]
P. Wei, K. Lin, D. Meng, T. Xie, Y. Na, ChemSusChem, 2018, 11, 1746-1750. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201800705
[77]
K. R. Tolod, S. Hernandez, N. Russo, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 7, 13. DOI:10.3390/catal7010013
[78]
H. L. Tan, R. Amal, Y. H. Ng, Mater J.. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 16498-16521. DOI:10.1039/C7TA04441K
[79]
P. Chatchai, Y. Murakami, S.-Y. Kishioka, A. Y. Nosaka, Y. Nosaka, Electrochim. Acta, 2009, 54, 1147-1152. DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2008.08.058
[80]
J. Su, L. Guo, N. Bao, C. A. Grimes, Nano Lett., 2011, 11, 1928-1933. DOI:10.1021/nl2000743
[81]
P. M. Rao, L. Cai, C. Liu, I. S. Cho, C. H. Lee, J. M. Weisse, P. Yang, X. Zheng, Nano Lett., 2014, 14, 1099-1105. DOI:10.1021/nl500022z
[82]
Y. Pihosh, I. Turkevych, K. Mawatari, T. Asai, T. Hisatomi, J. Uemura, M. Tosa, K. Shimamura, J. Kubota, K. Domen, T. Kitamori, Small, 2014, 10, 3692-3699. DOI:10.1002/smll.201400276
[83]
Y. Zhou, L. Zhang, L. Lin, B. R. Wygant, Y. Liu, Y. Zhu, Y. Zheng, C. B. Mullins, Y. Zhao, X. Zhang, G. Yu, Nano Lett., 2017, 17, 8012-8017. DOI:10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04626
[84]
H. Zhang, W. Zhou, Y. Yang, C. Cheng, Sol. Energy, 2017, 13, 1603840. DOI:10.1002/smll.201603840
[85]
N. Iqbal, I. Khan, Z. H. A. Yamani, A. Qurashi, Sol. Energy, 2017, 144, 604-611. DOI:10.1016/j.solener.2017.01.057
[86]
Q. Zeng, J. Li, L. Li, J. Bai, L. Xia, B. Zhou, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 217, 21-29. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.05.072
[87]
S. Xu, D. Fu, K. Song, L. Wang, Z. Yang, W. Yang, H. Hou, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 349, 368-375. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2018.05.100
[88]
T. Stoll, G. Zafeiropoulos, I. Dogan, H. Genuit, R. Lavrijsen, B. Koopmans, M.N. Tsampas, Electrochem. Commun., 2017, 82, 47-51. DOI:10.1016/j.elecom.2017.07.019
[89]
Z. Ma, K. Song, L. Wang, F. Gao, B. Tang, H. Hou, W. Yang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11, 889-897. DOI:10.1021/acsami.8b18261
[90]
K. Kim, S. K. Nam, J. H. Park, J. H. Moon, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 4480-4485. DOI:10.1039/C8TA09886G
[91]
I. Grigioni, K. G. Stamplecoskie, E. Selli, P. V. Kamat, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2015, 119, 20792-20800. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05128
[92]
S. Y. Chae, C. S. Lee, H. Jung, O.-S. Joo, B. K. Min, J. H. Kim, Y. J. Hwang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 19780-19790. DOI:10.1021/acsami.7b02486
[93]
I. Grigioni, K. G. Stamplecoskie, D. H. Jara, M. V. Dozzi, A. Oriana, G. Cerullo, P. V. Kamat, E. Selli, ACS Energy Lett., 2017, 2, 1362-1367. DOI:10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00216
[94]
I. Grigioni, M. Abdellah, A. Corti, M. V. Dozzi, L. Hammarström, E. Selli, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 14042-14045. DOI:10.1021/jacs.8b08309
[95]
D. A. Grave, N. Yatom, D. S. Ellis, M. C. Toroker, A. Rothschild, J. Phys. D, 2018, 30, 1706577. DOI:10.1002/adma.201706577
[96]
Y. Yang, S. Niu, D. Han, T. Liu, G. Wang, Y. Li, Adv. Energy Mater., 2017, 7, 1700555. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201700555
[97]
W. Luo, T. Yu, Y. Wang, Z. Li, J. Ye, Z. Zou, Phys J.. D, 2007, 40, 1091-1096. DOI:10.1088/0022-3727/40/4/027
[98]
K. P. Regan, C. Koenigsmann, S. W. Sheehan, S. J. Konezny, C. A. Schmuttenmaer, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120, 14926-14933. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b04390
[99]
K. Sivula, F. Le Formal, M. Grätzel, Chem. Mater., 2009, 21, 2862-2867. DOI:10.1021/cm900565a
[100]
T. Jin, P. Diao, Q. Wu, D. Xu, D. Hu, Y. Xie, M. Zhang, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2014, 148-149, 304-310.
[101]
S. Bai, X. Yang, C. Liu, X. Xiang, R. Luo, J. He, A. Chen, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 12906-12913. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02267
[102]
S. Y. Lim, W. Shen, Z. Gao, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 362-381. DOI:10.1039/C4CS00269E
[103]
Z. Zhao, T. Butburee, P. Peerakiatkhajohn, M. Lyu, S. Wang, L. Wang, H. Zheng, ChemistrySelect, 2016, 1, 2772-2777. DOI:10.1002/slct.201600718
[104]
W. Shi, X. Zhang, J. Brillet, D. Huang, M. Li, M. Wang, Y. Shen, Carbon, 2016, 105, 387-393. DOI:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.051
[105]
W. Kong, X. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Zhou, B. Chang, S. Zhang, H. Fan, B. Yang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 6, 1801653. DOI:10.1002/admi.201801653
[106]
J. Zhang, Z. Liu, Z. Liu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8, 9684-9691. DOI:10.1021/acsami.6b00429
[107]
J. H. Baek, B. J. Kim, G. S. Han, S. W. Hwang, D. R. Kim, I. S. Cho, H. S. Jung, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2017, 9, 1479-1487. DOI:10.1021/acsami.6b12782
[108]
J. Zhang, H. Ma, Z. Liu, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 201, 84-91. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.08.025
[109]
C. Wang, J. Tang, X. Zhang, L. Qian, H. Yang, Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater., 2018, 28, 200-204. DOI:10.1016/j.pnsc.2018.03.004
[110]
K. C. Leonard, K. M. Nam, H. C. Lee, S. H. Kang, H. S. Park, A. J. Bard, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117, 15901-15910. DOI:10.1021/jp403506q
[111]
K. M. Nam, E. A. Cheon, W. J. Shin, A. J. Bard, Langmuir, 2015, 31, 10897-10903. DOI:10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01780
[112]
D. Wang, P. S. Bassi, H. Qi, X. Zhao, Gurudayal, L. H. Wong, R. Xu, T. Sritharan, Z. Chen, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 9, 348. DOI:10.3390/ma9050348
[113]
Z. Hu, M. Xu, Z. Shen, J. C. Yu, Mater J.. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 14046-14053. DOI:10.1039/C5TA02528A
[114]
D. Jeon, N. Kim, S. Bae, Y. Han, J. Ryu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2018, 10, 8036-8044. DOI:10.1021/acsami.7b19203
[115]
S. Prabhu, L. Cindrella, O. J. Kwon, K. Mohanraju, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42, 29791-29796. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.100
[116]
Z. Li, Y. Qi, W. Wang, D. Li, Z. Li, Y. Xiao, G. Han, J.-R. Shen, C. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 40, 486-494. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63311-5
[117]
Z. Chen, Q. Huang, B. Huang, F. Zhang, C. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 40, 38-42. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63190-0
[118]
M. Z. Rahman, K. Davey, S.-Z. Qiao, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 1305-1322. DOI:10.1039/C7TA10404A
[119]
J. Fu, J. Yu, C. Jiang, B. Cheng, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 8, 1701503. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201701503
[120]
Q. Wang, T. Niu, L. Wang, J. Huang, H. She, Chin. Catal J.., 2018, 39, 613-618. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62987-5
[121]
T. J. Meyer, M. V. Sheridan, B. D. Sherman, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 6148-6169. DOI:10.1039/C7CS00465F
[122]
K. L. Materna, R. H. Crabtree, G. W. Brudvig, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 6099-6110. DOI:10.1039/C7CS00314E
[123]
D. Kandi, S. Martha, K. M. Parida, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42, 9467-9481. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.02.166
[124]
C. Gao, J. Wang, H. Xu, Y. Xiong, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 2799-2823. DOI:10.1039/C6CS00727A
[125]
Z. Wang, L. Wang, Sci. China Mater., 2018, 61, 806-821. DOI:10.1007/s40843-018-9240-y
[126]
D. Li, J. Shi, C. Li, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2018, 14, 1704179. DOI:10.1002/smll.201704179
[127]
S. Sahai, A. Ikram, S. Rai, R. Shrivastav, S. Dass, V. R. Satsangi, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2017, 68, 19-27. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.134
[128]
E. A. Gibson, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 6194-6209. DOI:10.1039/C7CS00322F
[129]
Q. Ding, B. Song, P. Xu, S. Jin, Chem, 2016, 1, 699-726. DOI:10.1016/j.chempr.2016.10.007
[130]
X. Ding, L. Zhang, Y. Wang, A. Liu, Y. Gao, Coord., 2018, 357, 130-143. DOI:10.1016/j.ccr.2017.10.020
[131]
Q. Wang, T. Niu, L. Wang, C. Yan, J. Huang, J. He, H. She, B. Su, Y. Bi, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 337, 506-514. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.126
[132]
Q. Wang, J. He, Y. Shi, S. Zhang, T. Niu, H. She, Y. Bi, Z. Lei, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 214, 158-167. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.05.044
[133]
R. Liu, Y. Lin, L.Y. Chou, S. W. Sheehan, W. He, F. Zhang, H. J. Hou, D. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 499-502. DOI:10.1002/anie.201004801
[134]
J. A. Seabold, K.-S. Choi, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23, 1105-1112. DOI:10.1021/cm1019469
[135]
Q. Liu, Q. Chen, J. Bai, J. Li, J. Li, B. Zhou, J. Solid State Electrochem., 2014, 18, 157-161. DOI:10.1007/s10008-013-2228-7
[136]
J. M. Spurgeon, J. M. Velazquez, M. T. McDowell, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 3623-3631. DOI:10.1039/c3cp55527e
[137]
X. Fan, B. Gao, T. Wang, X. Huang, H. Gong, H. Xue, H. Guo, L. Song, W. Xia, J. He, Appl. Catal. A, 2016, 528, 52-58. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2016.09.014
[138]
J. Huang, Y. Ding, X. Luo, Y. Feng, J. Catal., 2016, 333, 200-206. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2015.11.003
[139]
W. L. Kwong, C. C. Lee, J. Messinger, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120, 10941-10950. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02432
[140]
Z. Xu, X. Li, J. Li, L. Wu, Q. Zeng, Z. Zhou, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2013, 284, 285-290. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.07.095
[141]
L. Li, S. Xiao, R. Li, Y. Cao, Y. Chen, Z. Li, G. Li, H. Li, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2018, 1, 6871-6880. DOI:10.1021/acsaem.8b01215
[142]
F. Zhan, W. Liu, W. Li, J. Li, Y. Yang, Y. Li, Q. Chen, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41, 11925-11932. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.036
[143]
X. Deng, H. Tüysüz, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 3701-3714. DOI:10.1021/cs500713d
[144]
S. S. Gujral, A. N. Simonov, M. Higashi, X.-Y. Fang, R. Abe, L. Spiccia, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 3404-3417. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b00629
[145]
S. Chen, S. Shen, G. Liu, Y. Qi, F. Zhang, C. Li, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 3047-3051. DOI:10.1002/anie.201409906
[146]
T. Hong, Z. Liu, X. Zheng, J. Zhang, L. Yan, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 202, 454-459. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.053
[147]
J. W. Huang, Y. Zhang, Y. Ding, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 1841-1845. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.7b00022
[148]
F. Li, C. Xu, X. Wang, Y. Wang, J. Du, L. Sun, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 446-452. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63024-4
[149]
N. Wang, H. Zheng, W. Zhang, R. Cao, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 228-244. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)63001-8
[150]
D. W. Shaffer, Y. Xie, J. J. Concepcion, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 6170-6193. DOI:10.1039/C7CS00542C
[151]
J. Lin, B. Ma, M. Chen, Y. Ding, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 463-471. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62923-1
[152]
S.-S. Wang, G.-Y. Yang, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 4893-4962. DOI:10.1021/cr500390v
[153]
Y. Ji, L. Huang, J. Hu, C. Streb, Y.-F. Song, Energy Environ. Sci., 2015, 8, 776-789. DOI:10.1039/C4EE03749A
[154]
R. H. Crabtree, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 127-150. DOI:10.1021/cr5004375
[155]
Z. Yu, F. Li, L. Sun, Energy Environ. Sci., 2015, 8, 760-775. DOI:10.1039/C4EE03565H
[156]
B. Zhang, X. Zheng, O. Voznyy, R. Comin, M. Bajdich, M. García-Melchor, L. Han, J. Xu, M. Liu, L. Zheng, F. P. García de Arquer, C. T. Dinh, F. Fan, M. Yuan, E. Yassitepe, N. Chen, T. Regier, P. Liu, Y. Li, P. De Luna, A. Janmohamed, H. L. Xin, H. Yang, A. Vojvodic, E. H. Sargent, Science, 2016, 352, 333-337. DOI:10.1126/science.aaf1525
[157]
B. M. Klepser, B. M. Bartlett, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 1694-1697. DOI:10.1021/ja4086808
[158]
X. Hu, X.-J. Zheng, Y. Li, D.-K. Ma, Mater. Lett., 2018, 220, 36-39. DOI:10.1016/j.matlet.2018.02.109
[159]
H. Tong, Y. Jiang, Q. Zhang, J. Li, W. Jiang, D. Zhang, N. Li, L. Xia, ChemSusChem, 2017, 10, 3268-3275. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201700721
[160]
Y. Zhang, S. He, W. Guo, Y. Hu, J. Huang, J. R. Mulcahy, W. D. Wei, Chem. Rev., 2018, 118, 2927-2954. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00430
[161]
Q. Pan, C. Zhang, Y. Xiong, Q. Mi, D. Li, L. Zou, Q. Huang, Z. Zou, H. Yang, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 6378-6387. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00170
[162]
T. G. U. Ghobadi, A. Ghobadi, E. Ozbay, F. Karadas, ChemPhotoChem, 2018, 2, 161-182. DOI:10.1002/cptc.201700165
[163]
L. Wang, H. Hu, N. T. Nguyen, Y. Zhang, P. Schmuki, Y. Bi, Nano Energy, 2017, 35, 171-178. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.03.035
[164]
G. Liu, K. Du, J. Xu, G. Chen, M. Gu, C. Yang, K. Wang, H. Jakobsen, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 4233-4253. DOI:10.1039/C6TA10471A
[165]
D. Hu, P. Diao, D. Xu, Q. Wu, Nano Rese., 2016, 9, 1735-1751. DOI:10.1007/s12274-016-1067-0
[166]
P. Zhang, T. Wang, J. Gong, Adv. Mater., 2015, 27, 5328-5342. DOI:10.1002/adma.201500888
[167]
Q. Wang, J. He, Y. Shi, S. Zhang, T. Niu, H. She, Y. Bi, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 326, 411-418. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.171
[168]
P.-Y. Kuang, P.-X. Zheng, Z.-Q. Liu, J.-L. Lei, H. Wu, N. Li, T.-Y. Ma, Small, 2016, 12, 6735-6744. DOI:10.1002/smll.201602870
[169]
R. Solarska, A. Królikowska, J. Augustyński, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 7980-7983. DOI:10.1002/anie.201002173
[170]
K. H. Ng, L. Minggu Jeffery, N. A. Jaafar, K. Arifin, M. B. Kassim, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2017, 172, 361-367. DOI:10.1016/j.solmat.2017.07.040
[171]
F. Xu, Y. Yao, D. Bai, R. Xu, J. Mei, D. Wu, Z. Gao, K. Jiang, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2015, 458, 194-199. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2015.07.052
[172]
Z. Liu, J. Wu, J. Zhang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41, 20529-20535. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.09.055