催化学报  2019, Vol. 40 Issue (10): 1438-1487      DOI: S1872-2067(19)63400-5   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Jixing Liu
Zhen Zhao
Chunming Xu
Jian Liu
Structure, synthesis, and catalytic properties of nanosize cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions in environmental catalysis
Jixing Liua, Zhen Zhaoa,b, Chunming Xua, Jian Liua     
a. State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
b. Institute of Catalysis for Energy and Environment, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang 110034, Liaoning, China
* Corresponding author. Jian Liu, Tel: +86-10-89732278; Fax: +86-10-69724721; E-mail: liujian@cup.edu.cn
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21673290, U1662103)
Abstract: Nanosize cerium-zirconium solid solution (CZO) with a special fluorite structure has received an increasing research interest due to their remarkable advantages such as excellent oxygen storage capacity and great flexibility in their composition and structure. By partial metal (including rare earth, transition, alkaline earth or other metal) doping into CZO, the physicochemical properties of these catalytic materials can be controllable adjusted for the study of specific reactions. To date, nanosize CZO has been prepared by co-precipitation, sol-gel, surfactant-assisted approach, solution combustion, micro-emulsion, high energy mechanical milling, etc. The advent of these methodologies has prompted researchers to construct well-defined networks with customized micromorphology and functionalities. In this review, we describe not only the basic structure and synthetic strategies of CZO, but also their relevant applications in environmental catalysis, such as the purification for CO, nitrogen oxides (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOC), soot, hydrocarbon (HC), CO2 and solid particulate matters (PM), and some reaction mechanisms are also summarized.
© 2019, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Cerium-zirconium solid solution    Synthesis    Method    Structure    Environmental catalysis    
铈锆固溶体的结构、合成及在环境催化领域中的应用
刘计省a, 赵震a,b, 徐春明a, 刘坚a     
a. 中国石油大学(北京)化学工程与环境学院重质油国家重点实验室, 北京 102249;
b. 沈阳师范大学化学化工学院能源与环境催化研究所, 辽宁沈阳 110034
摘要:二氧化铈作为一种特殊的立方萤石结构,是应用最为广泛的稀土氧化物.同时,它也是一种合适的催化剂载体,可以促进活性组分的均匀分布,提高催化活性.但纯二氧化铈在高温下容易发生团聚,导致比表面积严重降低,而锆(Zr)掺杂所形成的铈锆固溶体(CZO)会显著提高铈基催化剂的稳定性.在Zr含量较低时,CZO主要呈现立方萤石结构,随着Zr含量增加,CZO结构逐渐由立方相转变为正方相,并最终形成单斜相.此外,与其它稀土氧化物不同,CZO由于其独特的结构性质、可控的组成、良好的氧化还原性能以及氧储存性能(OSC)而备受关注.截至目前,由于其特殊的物理化学性质和有序的空间形貌,纳米尺寸CZO格外引人关注.其形貌主要包括纳米粉末、一维纳米棒、纳米管、纳米带、纳米线、二维纳米薄膜、三维纳米笼、三维介孔、大孔和多级孔.基于其不同的形貌及有序的空间结构,CZO材料呈现不同的性质,并且已被广泛应用于多相催化领域.然而,不同形貌CZO材料的性能仍然有进一步提升的空间,例如:提高材料的稳定性及机械强度;探索环境友好型合成路径;考察反应时间、温度、溶液pH值、Ce和Zr源的浓度和构型、金属掺杂等对形貌的影响;研究不同形貌CZO纳米材料的物理化学性质;阐明CZO结构、形貌与其催化性能之间的关系.环境催化可将污染物转化为无害或有价值的物质,因而被认为是当今减少环境污染最有用的方法之一.而CZO作为活性组分、载体和氧存储材料具有优异的催化活性、较高选择性、高稳定性和极强的适应能力,是环境催化领域消除污染物过程中必不可少的组分,因而被广泛应用于催化CO、VOC、Soot、PM和HC燃烧、NOx选择性催化还原和直接降解、CO2转化等反应.研究发现:采用合适的制备方法能够改善CZO的结构和物理化学性质;调节Ce/Zr摩尔比能促进CZO基材料的氧化还原性能;负载活性金属如贵金属Pt、Rh、Pd或过渡金属Mn、Co、Cu等可提高CZO的催化性能;引入第三组分不仅可以增加CZO晶格氧缺陷,改善其OSC,进而提高其催化活性、选择性和稳定性,还可以抑制晶体转变,提高CZO催化剂的热稳定性.然而,自1970年代至今,进一步提高CZO基催化剂的OSC和热稳定性以满足日益严峻的环保要求迫在眉睫.
关键词铈锆固溶体    结构    合成    方法    环境催化    

1 Introduction

Nowadays, the issue of the environment is receiving ever increasing attention. One of the primary efforts of environmental protection is concentrated on controlling the emission of toxic pollutants from combustion of fossil fuels in automotive engines and industrial production [1-3]. Three-way catalysts (TWCs) are widely employed to lessen the emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), and hydrocarbons (HC) from automobile exhausts [4-6]. Among these catalysts, ceria (CeO2) is a key component, which exhibits cubic fluorite type of structure and has attracted much attention in recent decades due to its good redox property and high storage/release oxygen capacity, associated with the abundant oxygen vacancy and facile shift of Ce3+/Ce4+ [7-10]. It has also been used in many heterogeneous catalytic reactions [11-18], including methane combustion, water-gas shift, water steam reforming reaction, etc. Moreover, a large number of reports have shown that partial incorporation of zirconium ion (Zr4+) into ceria lattice can substantially enhance the redox properties and oxygen storage capacity (OSC) [19-30]. This is an interesting finding, considered that Zr4+ is isovalent with the host Ce4+ ion and also a fixed valent ion, so that it can not induce the valency change such as with Pr3+/4+ or creation of charge compensating defects such as with Gd3+ [31-35]. Instead, the smaller Zr4+, in comparison with Ce4+, prefers a 7-fold coordination, in contrast to the 8-fold coordination of the fluorite cation, resulting in a driving force to form oxygen vacancies associated with structural relaxation through reduction of the smaller Ce4+ to the bigger Ce3+ [36-39]. Based on the first principle calculations, a Zr dopant acts as low energy regions for the formation and clustering of oxygen vacancy [40-43]. In addition, the long-term thermal morphology and/or redox stability of pure CeO2 has been enhanced by the introduction of Zr [20, 28, 44, 45]. Furthermore, owing to the special redox ability of Ce-Zr solid solution (CZO), it can be employed to support noble metals and transition metal oxides or to design ternary solid solutions by doping small amounts of other transition or rare earth metals [46-53]. CZO has been widely employed in the abatement of CO, NOx and toxic volatile organic compounds (VOC) and many other heterogeneous catalysis reactions. This review primarily focuses on the structure, synthesis, and application of Ce-Zr-based solid solutions in environmental catalysis. The first part of the review presents advances in the structure and synthesis of CZO, and the catalytic properties of CZO are thereafter reviewed in the second part.

2 The structure of nanosize cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions

Ceria has a special cubic fluorite structure and is the most widely used rare earth oxide. It is also a good catalyst support that can promote the uniform distribution of active components and enhance the catalytic activity [17]. However, pure ceria easily aggregates at high temperatures, and Zr doping can enhance the stability of cerium-based materials. CZO exhibits a main cubic fluorite structure when Zr content is low, as shown in Fig. 1. However, CZO undergoes a cubic to tetragonal fluorite phase transition with increasing Zr content and ultimately forms a monoclinic phase at high Zr contents [39, 54-56]. The bond length ratio of c- to a-axis (c/a) is equal to 1.4 for the tetragonal phase (t-phase), which is attributed to the P42/nmc space group and shows two distortions t′ (c/a = 1.01) and t" (c/a = 1) [57]. One can distinguish between the t′ and t" phases from the measurement of lattice parameters, though some similarity between the t" and cubic structures. The phase change from cubic to t" would induce an increase in the wavenumber of Raman vibrational modes and remarkable changes in ionic bond strength [54, 58]. Similar to the cubic to tetragonal distortion in CZO, the relaxation of oxygen atoms away from their ideal fluorite positions and the formation of ordered domains have been observed in cubic fluorite and hafnia by electron diffraction. The structure of CZO materials exhibits some primary features, which have been reported by Yashima and Fábregas et al. [59, 60]. One of the important features is that the first oxygen shell around Ce exhibits the characteristics expected for pure CeO2 (fluorite-type crystal structure, one shell with 8 oxygen atoms) even if the crystallite phase is t (t′ and t" forms) or c. In contrast, the first shell around Zr atoms shows obvious differences from the changes in the crystal structure. This means that it splits into two oxygen subshells for the tetragonal forms and displays only one shell for the c phase. In other words, the tetragonal-to-cubic phase transition is closely related to a symmetry change of the first oxygen shell around Zr atoms, whereas that around Ce atoms remains unchanged. The appearance of cubic, t′, and t" phases in CZO depends strongly on the Zr content. Yashima et al. [54] proposed a phase diagram according to XRD and Raman analysis, as shown in Fig. 2, and it could be depicted as follows. A cubic fluorite phase c is present (group Fm3m) for x > 0.85 at temperature below 1000 ℃. A tetragonal phase t (group P42/nmc) can be produced at high temperature by solid-state synthesis and then cooling to room temperature for 0.10 < x < 0.30, and it is thermodynamical stable. A monoclinic phase (group P21/c) is formed for x < 0.10, while a metastable phase t' is seen for 0.30 < x < 0.65. In the end, t" or pseudo-cubic phase is intermediate between the c and t' phases (0.65 < x < 0.85 or 0.5 < x < 0.85 for small particles). This is characterized by a cubic cation sublattice, while its oxygen sublattice is tetragonally distorted (P42/nmc). The phase boundaries should be very approximate. As a matter of fact, in the case of the metastable tetragonal phases, the structure distortion of CZO should be highly depended on the calcination temperature and the particle size of the materials.

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of CexZr1-xO2 lattice structure: O, Zr, and Ce.
Fig. 2. Metastable-stable phase diagram in CexZr1-xO2 system: c-phase, t"-phase, c'-phase, t'-phase. The dash lines represent the metastable phase boundaries. Reprinted from [54] with permission.

Due to the complexity of the phase diagram, it is difficult to determine the phase homogeneity of CZO, even though a great effort has been made. Small changes in oxygen ion-cation coordination are not always detectable as additional peaks (or peak splitting) by XRD. However, Raman and other vibrational spectroscopy methods may be used to distinguish the primary oxygen ion distortions between the t" and cubic phases [54]. Raman spectroscopy can play a critical role in the determination of all these phases and in the identification of the mechanical stress. In fact, laser-excited Raman spectra are extremely sensitive to M–O bonds, while powder XRD patterns are essentially determined by the arrangement of the lattice cations. Unfortunately, these conventional techniques fail in the investigation of the low crystallization degree materials, however, which are very important in heterogeneous catalysis. More advanced techniques, such as neutron diffraction and EXAFS, have proved to be effectively on determining inhomogeneity and detecting complementary structural information [36, 62-65]. Moreover, Montini et al. [66] investigated the potential of luminescence spectroscopy for identifying the homogeneity of CZO materials using Eu(Ⅲ) ion as a structural probe. This technique provides a detailed picture of local environment of the cations in these materials due to the fact that the luminescence properties of Eu(Ⅲ) are strongly affected by the local surrounding around the cation ion (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Eu(Ⅲ) emission spectra of the thermodynamically stable cubic Ce-Zr-EuO2 (CZE) samples with the schematic representation of Eu surface site located on the stable (111) surface of cubic Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 and of the single Eu bulk site in Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 by EXAFS data. The details of 5D→f7 F0 transition are reported for both surface and bulk Eu(Ⅲ)-doped materials after different thermal treatments. (a) Surface-doped CZE calcination at 500 ℃ for 5 h; (b) Surface-doped CZE calcination at 1000 ℃ for 5 h; (c) Bulk-doped CZE calcination at 500 ℃ for 5 h; (d) Bulk-doped CZE calcination at 1000 ℃ for 5 h. Reprinted from [66] with permission.

Great efforts to establish a correlation between structure and physicochemical properties have been devoted to a lot of research concerning CZO materials. The presence of surface domains [67, 68], formation of ordered defective structures [69-71], disordered oxygens coordinated around zirconium [72], and distortion in the oxygen sublattice [38, 66-68] have improved redox properties of CZO with respect to CeO2. Comparison of CZO powders with different particle sizes between ~6 and 80 nm, the phase boundaries exhibit an apparent shift to slightly higher zirconia contents with the decrease of the particle size and the increase of the solubility of zirconia in each phase [73]. The position of the phase boundaries for CZO can only be taken as approximate because t′ and t" are metastable phases and the degree of distortion of the cubic fluorite structure strongly depends on the synthesis method, particle size, morphology, metal doping and supported active phase type [74].

3 Recent advances in the synthesis and morphology of nanosize cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions

It is well known that morphology and microstructure significantly influence the physicochemical properties and the performances of CZO materials, especially the high surface area, which can supply a large number of active sites for the proceeding of catalytic reactions [75]. Materials with nanosize (1~100 nm) will exhibit special properties due to the following effects: a) quantum size effect; b) small size effect; c) surface effect; d) macroscopic quantum tunneling effect. Hence, it is well worthy to pay attention and spare efforts on the study of the synthesis of nanosize CZO with different morphology and catalytic performances.

3.1 Synthesis methods for nanosize cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions

A synthesis method is significantly important for nanosize CZO due to its influence on the size, morphology, structure, surface state, and oxygen vacancies. It is closely related to the reducibility of cerium-based composite of the as-prepared materials [76-80]. The controllable synthesis research is an issue worthy to concern. To date, various synthetic routes have been developed for the synthesis of nanosize cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions, such as co-precipitation (CP), sol-gel (SG), self-assembly, template-assisted approach, solution combustion (SC), micro-emulsion (ME), high energy mechanical milling, etc.

3.1.1 Co-precipitation method

CP is one of the most commonly used methods for nanosize CZO synthesis owing to its simple synthesis process. In general, it includes room-temperature [81-85], medium-to-high temperature [86-88], surfactant-modified [89, 90], and ultrasound-induced CP [91]. Precipitants (ammonia water and ammonium carbonate) are employed to react with the soluble components of cerium and zirconium compounds and form precipitate in soluble precursors. After a series of process of separation, washing, drying and calcination, the final products are obtained. The reaction is as follows (Eqs. (1)–(4)):

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)

This method can make an excellent mixing of the different components. The surface area of CZO prepared by this traditional CP method is 20–120 m2/g, which would decrease to about 20 m2/g after being calcined at 1000 ℃. Hsiang et al. [92] prepared Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 powders by the CP method and studied the correlation between the crystallite structure and reductive property. The results indicated that Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 decomposed into Ce-rich (cubic) and Zr-rich (tetragonal) phases from a single cubic phase after being calcined above 1100 ℃. Moreover, the cation diffusion may result in the structural alteration under reduction/re-oxidation treatment. In this synthesis process, because the precursors are made of hydroxides or salts of cerium and zirconium, a calcination process at high temperature is needed to form solid solution. Nevertheless, high temperature would lead to the loss of surface area seriously. Furthermore, during the drying process, the particles might aggregate due to the effect of surface tension of water (or other solvents). Therefore, a lot of improved ways were developed to enhance the property of nanosize CZO. Chen et al. [93] proposed a modified CP method with triethylamine assisting to prepare CZO with a big surface area and high thermal stability. They found that the adsorbed surfactant (triethylamine) on the surface of particles might form a protective layer, which could serve as an effective barrier to inhibit the grains from aggregating. Consequently, the added surfactants could remarkably improve the particle dispersion and increase the surface area of CZO.

3.1.2 Sol-gel method

The SG method is also widely used for nanosize CZO synthesis. Metal compounds are mixed with the highly active coordination compounds and undergo hydrolysis and condensation reaction to form sol and then transform to gel with three dimension net-work structure. Final products are obtained after drying and calcination. Generally, SG synthesis is a suitable method to prepare CZO with high degree of homogeneity by controlling hydrolysis of alkoxide or similar precursors. However, when the rates of hydrolysis between the two metals are quite different, it may be difficult to simultaneously hydrolyze both precursors, particularly when Zr(n-C3H7OH)4 is employed as a precursor. Therefore, appropriate chemical modifications of the hydrolyzing process are needed to control the rate of hydrolysis. Meeyoo et al. [94] adopted an SG technique to prepare Ce1-xZrxO2 (x = 0~1.0) mixed oxide catalysts for CO oxidation. The initial solution was synthesized by mixing 0.4 mol/L of urea solution with 0.1 mol/L of metal salt solutions with volumetric ratio equal to 0.5, and the ratio was changed depending on the desired solid solution. The catalytic activities of these mixed oxide catalysts were found to be dependent on Ce/Zr ratio, and Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 exhibited the highest CO conversion. Kozlov et al. [76] prepared an Al2O3-supported Ce0.45Zr0.55O2 catalyst by a modified SG method. In this preparation process, 2-methyl-2, 4-pentanediol was added to affect the substitution of the isopropoxy ligand by the diol. As a result, CZO exhibited a high content of readily reducible Ce4+. Additionally, the mixed oxide particles still retained small and homogeneous single phase even after reduction at 980 ℃ and reoxidation at 900 ℃. Yu et al. [95] synthesized a series of M-Ce0.7Zr0.3O2 (M = Li, Na, K) using a modified SG method. In the synthesis process, a proper amount of citric acid (CA) was added to control the hydrolysis of precursors and then calcined at 600 ℃ for 6 h to obtain the final products. The as-prepared materials exhibited a higher catalytic activity for soot combustion than that prepared by the CP method.

3.1.3 Template-assisted method

The template-assisted method is widely employed for the preparation of nanostructural CZO due to the advantages of convenience, simplicity and inducing effect of various templates with special structures or morphology. Two types of templates are available as follows.

(a) Soft template

Surfactants can form micelles with different shape or morphology when dissolved into water up to a certain concentration, and thus the micelles can be used as templates for nanomaterial synthesis. In recent years, numerous studies have been reported on the use of cationic, anionic and nonionic surfactants as template to synthesize nanosize CZO with mesoporous structure [96]. The commonly used surfactants are cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and tri-block copolymers Pluronic P123 and F127. Trovarelli et al. [89] prepared CZO with high surface area by a soft template-assisted approach. In a typical preparation process, the mixed oxide was synthesized by adding an aqueous solution of the cationic surfactant CTAB to precursor solution made of hydroxides or salts of cerium and zirconium. Cationic surfactants effectively incorporated into cerium and zirconium hydrous oxides under basic conditions. The presence of cerium inhibited alkyl-trimethyl-ammonium salt acting as the template to form regular pore structure. The removal of surfactants after calcination gave rise to the formation of fluorite-structured CZO with high specific surface area. Yuan et al. [97] demonstrated a novel straightforward and reproducible method to prepare a highly ordered mesoporous CZO with a 2-D hexagonal structure. The general synthesis strategy was based on an SG method combined with evaporation-induced self-assembly (EISA) in ethanol, and P123 was used as the template and ceric nitrate and zirconium oxide chloride as the precursors. A series of mesoporous CZO with different Ce/Zr ratios was obtained under the optimal temperature and humidity conditions.

(b) Hard template

The ordinary hard templates contain porous anodic alumina (AAO), molecular sieves, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and silica nanowires. They can be used as rigid templates for nanomaterial synthesis. Zamani et al. [98] prepared mesoporous CZO using mesoporous silica (SBA-15 and KIT-6) as template agents, which were impregnated with precursor materials. Structural analysis of the products confirmed the formation of mesostructures, and thermogravimetry measurements showed the remarkable increase of material OSC compared with pure ceria. In the case of Ce0.95Zr0.05O2, response measurements showed the relatively fast and stable response of the sensor to oxygen-containing atmospheres.

Some special structures require specific hard templates. The three-dimensional ordered macroporous (3DOM) structure is prepared via organic polymer templates such as polystyrene (PS), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and polystyrene-methyl methacrylate-acrylic acid microspheres. Some works have been reported on this aspect [99-104]. Zhao et al. [102] prepared a series of 3DOM CZO using PMMA colloidal crystal as template agent, as shown in Fig. 4a. In a typical synthesis process, the first step was to prepare an ordered colloidal crystal template (CCT) with monodispersed PMMA spheres (444 nm) and PS spheres (454 nm). The second step was to synthesize the liquid precursor. The stoichiometric amount of cerium nitrate and zirconium oxide chloride were dissolved in an mixed solvent including ethylene glycol (EG) and methanol (20–40 vol%) followed by pouring into a volumetric flask. Then, the dried PMMA or PS colloidal crystal was soaked in the solution for several hours. Excess solution was removed by filtration. Finally, 3DOM CZO was obtained by removing the template via calcining at 650 ℃ for 5 h. The as-prepared Ce0.7Zr0.3O2 material exhibited a well-ordered 3DOM structure, which consisted of interconnected networks of spherical voids through open windows, ca. 120 nm in diameter, as shown in Fig. 4b and 4c. The walls of the macroporous samples were crystallited.

Fig. 4. (a) The schematic diagram for the preparation of 3DOM CZO by the colloidal crystal template method; (b) SEM and (c) TEM images of a representative 3DOM Ce0.7Zr0.3O2. Inset: (b) an enlarged area of 3DOM Ce0.7Zr0.3O2, (c) the corresponding SAED pattern.
3.1.4 Hydrothermal and solvothermal method

The hydrothermal method refers to a synthesis route via reaction of species in the water media (solvent) under the condition of certain temperature (100–1000 ℃) and pressure (1–100 MPa). It is well known that CP and SG methods can be used to prepare catalytic materials of high purity. However, the as-prepared materials usually show amorphous structures. Hydrothermal synthesis can overcome this drawback and may be regarded as an effective strategy for synthesis of specific nanosize catalytic materials in liquid phase. This technique has attracted more attention since the 1980s when nanoceria was first synthesized via a hydrothermal method by Matijevic et al. [105]. In the solvothermal method, organic solvents are employed instead of water. The whole process of hydrothermal or solvothermal synthesis is controllable and can be regarded as a green chemistry process due to the very good control of volatizing of organic solvents, non-toxic gas releasing. And the synthesis can conveniently obtain the nanomaterials with regular shape, size and crystallite phases. Walton et al. [106] reported a simple one-step hydrothermal method for preparation of nanocrystallite CZO, whose redox properties depended crucially on the reaction conditions. Ihm et al. [107] fabricated CZO by a continuous hydrothermal method in supercritical water. The supercritical synthesis led to CZO with better thermal stability and higher OSC than that synthesized by the CP method.

The solvothermal method is a direct and rapid method, which has been used for the synthesis of metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs) for various applications [108, 109]. Devaraju et al. [110] adopted the solvothermal method under supercritical and high autogenous pressure conditions (400 ℃, 40 MPa) for the direct preparation of nanocrystallite powders CZO, which exhibited a high OSC value.

3.1.5 Solution combustion method

The SC method is simple and fast, and yields high surface area products with desired composition. It is an attractive synthetic route especially for the preparation of multicomponent oxide materials because the homogeneity of the aqueous solution of the salts is preserved in the combustion residue. The materials prepared by this method not only possess better homogeneity and purity, but also have high surface areas. Reddy et al. [111] reported a single synthesis step of nanosize CeO2-MxOy mixed oxides (MxOy = SiO2, TiO2, ZrO2 and Al2O3) by the SC method. Among these samples, CeO2-SiO2 showed the highest surface area compared with other oxides. The decreasing order of specific surface areas was as follows: CeO2-SiO2 (125 m2/g) > CeO2-TiO2 (79 m2/g) > CeO2-ZrO2 (56 m2/g) > CeO2-Al2O3 (38 m2/g). Chen et al. [112] prepared mesoporous CZO via a salt-assisted combustion method using EG as the fuel and nitrate as the oxidant, and the effect of added salt on the properties of the products was studied. The presence of salt led to a more than 10-fold increase in the specific surface area of the products at a given molar ratio of EG/nitrate. It was owing to that the instant salt in-situ precipitation inhibited the formation of hard agglomerates and sintering of naonocrystallites. Therefore, this method provided a novel and effective strategy to tailor the material properties. Zhang et al. [113] synthesized Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 solid solutions by CP, SG, SC and template-assisted approaches. The catalytic activities of bulk and γ-Al2O3 supported Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 solid solutions were investigated for the oxidation of soluble organic fractions from diesel engine exhausts. Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 mixed oxide was active for lube oxidation. Among these materials, the sample prepared by the SC method showed the best catalytic activity due to the reservation of the high surface area and small particle size.

3.1.6 Micro-emulsion method

Surface and interfacial catalysis plays a key role in the integrated synthesis and construction of functional architectures particularly for nanosize thin film due to the effect of surface tension and viscosity [114, 115]. Zhou et al. [116] prepared five types of CZO-modified Al2O3 (CZA) by SG, ME, CP with supercritical drying (CPS), CP with common drying (CPC), and impregnation (IM) methods and investigated the effect of preparation method on the properties of CZA. The results revealed that CZA prepared by CPS and ME methods exhibited better textural and structural properties as well as better reducibility, which led to the higher catalytic activity and wider air-to-fuel operation window of the corresponding Pd-only three-way catalysts. Boutonnet et al. [117] adopted a novel and direct approach for the preparation of inorganic NPs by an oil-in-water (o/w) ME method, in contrast to the typical water-in-oil ME method. As shown in Fig. 5, the strategy involves the use of organometallic precursors, which are dissolved in oil droplets in a nanometer scale (stabilized by surfactant) and dispersed in a continuous aqueous phase.

Fig. 5. Strategies for the preparation of inorganic nanosize CZO by the o/w microemulsion reaction approach. (a) Mixing two microemulsions of identical composition except for reactants A organometallic precursor and B precipitating/reducing/oxidizing agent; (b) Using a microemulsion containing reactant A, and then directly adding reactant B. Reprinted from [117] with permission.
3.1.7 Self-assembly method

The self-assembly method refers to structure units such as molecules or NPs integrating spontaneously via non-covalent bons to form aggregation with thermodynamically stable structure. The driving force of this process contains the electrostatic force, hydrogen bond, electronic effect, van der Waals force, and space effect of functional groups [118]. The self-assembly materials are all with ordered structure and morphology, and the formation process is according to the principle that free energy should be minimized and without extra external force. Chane-Ching et al. [119] developed a two-step self-assembly approach for the preparation of ordered 2-D or 3-D nanostructured materials with a large surface area. Ceria NPs were functionalized by using the CH2CH2O groups of the surfactant. According to the cooperative self-assembly of colloidal NPs, hexagonal arrays of CeO2 were obtained and the symmetry of the arrays was maintained upon heating up to 500 ℃. Chou et al. [120] facilely synthesized a series of mesoporous CZO nanocrystallite with excellent thermal stabilities through the EISA strategy. Fig. 6 exhibited the orderedly mesoporous structure for as-prepared different Ce/Zr ratio materials.

Fig. 6. TEM images of Mn-CexZr1-xO2 with different Ce/Zr ratios by calcination at 600 ℃. (a) Mn-Ce0.2Zr0.8O2; (b) Mn-Ce0.4Zr0.6O2; (c) Mn-Ce0.5Zr0.5O2. Reprinted from [121] with permission.
3.1.8 Sonochemical synthesis method

Sonochemical process has proved to be an effective method for the preparation of novel materials with unusual properties [121]. Moreover, it is an environmentally friendly synthesis route for functional materials and may be a good approach that can be used to synthesize nanoporous transition metal oxide solid solutions. Nevertheless, only a few studies on sonochemical synthesis of multicomponent materials have been found. Gurav et al. [122] investigated the sonochemical synthesis of nanoporous ceria and CZO with high surface area via high-intensity ultrasound irradiation. Zhang et al. [123] prepared nanosize CZO with a very big surface area of 226 m2/g and average size about 3.7 nm by a sonochemical method in the presence of polyethylene glycol (PEG). Moreover, its surface area and nanosize rarely changed after being calcined at 500 ℃. Recently, Nikitenko et al. [124] prepared Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 nanocrystallite mixed oxide with external mesopores using simultaneous sonohydrothermal treatment. The obtained material exhibited higher surface area than the similar material prepared by an ultrasonically assisted CP method.

3.1.9 Physical method
3.1.9.1 High-energy milling

The high-energy milling method relies on the high pressure and mechanic force to make particles with high density of lattice defects, and thus the as-prepared materials possess high OSC. Trovarelli et al. [125] synthesized nanosize CZO via high-energy milling, and ZrO2 was doped into fluorite structural CeO2 lattice when the milling speeds gradually increased. Recently, they successfully prepared CZO particles wrapped in a 2-D carbon envelope by high-energy milling of CZO powders and soot, and the atomic ratio of metal-to-carbon increased with more milling time. Consequently, the activation and transfer of the oxygen in ceria were shifted to very low temperatures, which significantly boosted the soot combustion rate [126].

3.1.9.2 Electrospinning method

The electrospinning method is a cost-effective method for preparing electrospun fibers with high surface areas and adequately small grain sizes, which are indispensible for good reducibility and fast low-temperature reoxidation in solar-driven redox cycles. The high surface area of electrospun structures can accelerate the reoxidation surface kinetics at low temperature and inhibit sintering at high reduction temperatures. Davidson and Jackson prepared a series of CZO fibers with a uniform diameter by a controlled electrospinning method [127]. The electrospinning set-up was shown in Fig. 7. These CZO fibers exhibited remarkable sinter-resistance, which maintained their structure even after 108 redox cycles with reduction at 1400 ℃ and oxidation with CO2 at 800 ℃. It was higher than those observed for other ceria-based materials conducting under similarly high temperature conditions.

Fig. 7. Fiber production via electrospinning set-up. (a) Wire coil spinneret rotating through a bath of spinning solution, fibers on a rotating wire drum collector; (b) Removal of the collected fibers from the wire drum, leaving a non-woven mat of polymer and ceramic precursor fibers; (c) SEM image of the ceramic + precursor fibers. Reproduced from [127] with permission from the PCCP Owner Societies.
3.1.10 Other methods

Liquid-feed flame spray pyrolysis (LF-FSP) is a facile method which was developed in recent years for material synthesis. In this synthesis strategy, organometallic alcohol solutions are usually used and are aerosolized with oxygen and ignited. The combustion process produces flames up to 1500–2000 ℃. If the combustion process derived metal oxide ions are quenched rapidly enough, e.g., 1000 ℃/ms, it is possible to prepare a large variety of unaggregated (easily dispersed) nanopowders whose compositions are almost completely determined by the precursors in solution [128-130]. Kim et al. [128] synthesized CZO and (Ce0.7Zr0.3O2)x(Al2O3)1-x core-shell nanopowders by LF-FSP using metallo-organic precursors Ce(O2CCH2CH3)3(OH), alumatrane N(CH2CH2O)3Al, and Zr(O2CCH2CH3)2(OH)2. The as-prepared materials possessed mean particle size below 20 nm and specific surface area of 30–50 m2/g and showed good catalytic activity for HC oxidation and deNOx reaction even without co-catalyst of noble metals.

In addition, some other methods have also been developed for cerium-zirconium based material synthesis, including supercritical anti-solvents [131, 132], microwave-assisted method [133-136], electrochemical deposition [137-139], microwave method [140], etc.

3.1.11 Summary of synthesis methods for nanosize cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions

To date, a great variety of methods have been developed for the synthesis of nanosize CZO, and these methods have a great impact on the properties of materials, such as specific surface area, crystal phase, redox, OSC, and thermal stability, as listed in Table 1. The preparation of nanosize CZO usually involves four steps: the synthesis of precursor, the pretreatment of precursor, the transformation of precursor into solid solutions, and post-treatment of solid solutions. At present, the primary preparation methods for nanosize CZO are CP, SG, surfactant-assisted template, hydrothermal, SC, and ME methods, and each of them possesses its feature and certain deficiencies.

Table 1
Main characteristics of different synthesis methods for nanosize CZO materials.

The high energy ball milling method is highly costly and time consuming, and the material prepared by this method exhibits low specific surface area and OSC value. Thus, this method is rarely employed to prepare nanosize CZO. Generally, SG synthesis is a suitable method to prepare CZO with high degree of homogeneity by controlling the hydrolytic process of the precursor like alkoxide. However, it should be taken into account that when the rates of hydrolysis between the two metals are quite different, it may be difficult to simultaneously hydrolyze the both precursors. Consequently, CZO prepared by this method often exists split phase. But the homogeneity of CZO can be improved via suitable chemical modification or adding certain solvent to control the hydrolysis rate of the both precursors. The SC method is usually used to prepare nanostructural CZO by burning Ce(NO3)3, ZrO(NO3)2, oxalyl dihydrazide, and carbohydrazide. Its advantage is that the samples possess high specific surface area, and the disadvantages are high cost, waste gas producing, and low OSC value. The hydrothermal method is employed to prepare CeO2 and ZrO2-containing materials, and CZO prepared by this method under supercritical conditions shows good homogeneity, high OSC value, and excellent thermal stability. However, its production amount is very little. In general, the hydrothermal method is used in laboratory and not industrialized yet. The CP method is one of the common methods to prepare CZO. It uses a precipitant to transform soluble components into complex compounds and the corresponding solid solution is obtained by separation, washing, drying, and roasting. Currently, the CP method is convenient for industrial production due to its simple process, controllable condition, cheap raw materials, and low preparation cost. Nevertheless, high temperature calcination can induce a serious decrease of specific surface area of solid solution. Moreover, when precipitation is performed in water, the particles size would aggregate and grow up in the process of drying owing to the effect of surface tension. Therefore, the various preparation technologies for nanosize CZO material synthesis still need to be improved.

3.2 Morphology for nanosize cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions

As is known to all, properties and functions of CZO materials highly depend on their morphology and size. Hence, the controllable synthesis of CZO with unique morphology is significantly important [141, 142]. Meanwhile, CZO with nanometer size usually possesses high OSC value and specific surface areas, which can greatly enhance the catalytic activity. Nanopowders and one-dimensional (1-D) nanostructure nowadays have been the most popular realm of synthesis of cerium-zirconium-based materials, including nanowires, nanobelts, nanorods, and nanotubes. Moreover, nanoplates, nanodisks, linearly-mesoporous structure (two-dimensional, 2-D), and nanocages, or 3-D mesoporous or macroporous structure (three-dimensional, 3-D) and various specific morphology of CZO have also arouse the interests of researchers. CZO can be divided into five categories according to the different morphology: nanopowders, 1-D, 2-D, 3-D, and other morphology such as core-shell structure, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2
Main characteristics and synthesis methods of nanosize CZO materials with the different morphology.
3.2.1 Nanopowders

Nanopowder is an important part of the nanomaterial family, which is composed of NPs with the size of 1–100 nm. Nanopowder is a transition state between atoms (or molecules) and macroscopic objects. The quantitative change of NPs may lead to the remarkable change of material properties. In fact, the crystal symmetry, space lattice, defects, dislocations, and crystal boundaries of macroscopic objects have been deeply and systematically investigated. Nanopowders may be a promising material in both fundamental research and application development due to its special properties. Especially, CZO nanopowders have attracted much attention in recent years [143, 144]. They are synthesized mainly via CP, hydrothermal, and SG methods. Despite of many studies on the synthesis technique of CZO nanopowders, it is still a tough issue to obtain products with high stability and uniform size.

To prepare nanopowders with high stability, surfactants are employed in synthesis processes to promote the dispersion of precursors. PVP (polyvinylpyrrolidone) can be used in different dispersion systems as a stabilizer agent for preventing reaction product aggregation. Si et al. [145] used Ce(NO3)3·6H2O as precursor and PVP as stabilizing agent in alcohol solution to prepare CeO2 colloidal particles with sizes of ca. 4 nm. Du et al. [146] used CTAB as template to induce the assembly of Ce0.7Zr0.3O2 nanopowders via the CP method. Under the condition of plenitudinous reaction and aging time, CZO with a pure crystal phase was obtained. The as-prepared material possessed an average size of 15 nm, pore diameter of 2–4 nm, and specific surface area of 179 m2/g and showed high stability. Liu et al. [147] prepared a series of Ce-Zr-Pr nanopowder oxide catalysts via uniting solution-combustion and rotating evaporation techniques. The catalysts exhibited a cubic fluorite structure with particle sizes in the range of 6–8 nm. Darr et al. [143] prepared La- and Y- doped nanosize CZO with different compositions by a hydrothermal method. Both samples showed an average particle size of 4.5 nm. For nanopowder synthesis, the raw material utilization is usually inefficient and the process of preparation may also be not environmentally friendly. Thus, seeking for the efficient and comfortable synthesis of CZO nanopowders of regular morphology with high stability and activity is an imperative issue.

3.2.2 1-D cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions
3.2.2.1 Nanowires, nanobelts, and nanofibers

Nanowires, nanobelts, and nanofibers are 1-D nanostuctures, but studies on the morphology of CZO materials are not sufficient compared with nanopowders. Despite of this, some work has been reported. Song et al. [148] prepared CZO nanofibers via an electrospinning technique. In this process, P123 and polyethylene oxide (PEO) were used as co-template agents and ceric nitrate and zirconium nitrate as precursors. P123 and PEO mixture allowed the formation of microphase domains during the electrospinning process. A handful of PVP was also introduced to control the viscosity of the composite solutions for better electrospinning. The as-prepared material has a uniform size of 300–400 nm in length. Li et al. [149] synthesized ceria-based nanobelts by electrochemical deposition on Cu substrates. The surface morphology was highly dependent on the additive and current density of electrochemical deposition, and this method could be applied to prepare other nanosize rare earth oxide materials. Hyeon et al. [150] fabricated ceria nanowires with a length of 71 nm and an ultrasmall diameter of 1.2 nm by a nonhydrolytic sol-gel method. During the thermolysis of the precursor complexes, the selective adsorption of capping ligand onto particular crystallographic facets was important for the formation of ultrathin nanowires, whose lengths were tunable by altering the amount of oleylamine. This strategy is effective in adjusting the length/diameter ratio of nanowires.

3.2.2.2 Nanorods

A number of pure CeO2 nanorods have been synthesized via hydrothermal (solvothermal), ME, template-assisted, and chemical vapor deposition methods. However, compared with the synthesis of CeO2 nanorods, CZO nanorods are more difficult to fabricate. Du et al. [151] synthesized nanorod-like Ce0.7Zr0.3O2 solid solutions by a sodium dodecyl sulfate-assisted precipitation method. Typical Ce0.7Zr0.3O2 nanorods were 450 nm in length and 40 nm in average diameter, with specific surface area and OSC of 194 m2/g and 374 μmol/g, respectively. Shen et al. [152] prepared Ce1-xZrxO2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.2) nanorods with an average length of ~40 nm and a mean diameter of ~8 nm by an aqueous-phase CP method. The reaction was under the conditions of 95 ℃ in the solvent media and lasted for 8 h. Lee et al. [153] employed a two-step route under hydrothermal conditions and prepared CZO nanorods with average diameter and length in a range from 20–30 to 100–200 nm, respectively. Shi and Zhang et al. [154] designed the synthesis of MnOm/CZO nanomaterials and investigated the effect of the morphology of CZO on the catalytic activity of MnOm/CZO for the SCR of NO with NH3. Three different shapes of CZO nanomaterials such as nanorods, nanocubes, and nanopolyhedra were prepared by a hydrothermal method and the temperature was maintained at 100 ℃ for nanorods. Zhang et al. [155] prepared Ce0.9Zr0.1O2-supported manganese oxides (MnOm) nanorods through a hydrothermal method with the reactants at 100 ℃ for 24 h. TEM images in Fig. 8 showed Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 nanorods with a length range of 15–90 nm and a uniform diameter (11 ± 3 nm).

Fig. 8. TEM images of (a) Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 and (b) MnOm/Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 nanorods. HRTEM image (c) and EDS pattern (d) of MnOm/Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 nanorods. Reprinted from [155] with permission.

Many metal-doped CZO samples were also investigated by researchers. Dai et al. [156] prepared Ce0.6Zr0.3Y0.1O2 (CZY) solid solution nanorods with cubic fluorite structure by adopting the strategy of CTAB-assisted hydrothermal treatment at 120 and 160 ℃ for 72 h. Fig. 9 shows that both samples exhibited a rodlike shape with length variation from 30 nm to 2 μm and uniform diameters of ~10 nm, and the samples contained some irregular NPs. Yan et al. [157] synthesized monodisperse and large-scale Pr-doped ceria nanorods by combination of low-temperature aging and high-temperature precipitation without further sintering. The morphology of the products was 400 nm in length and 30 nm in diameter, and Pr-doped ceria nanorods exhibited relatively high specific surface area (153 m2/g).

Fig. 9. SEM (a, d) and HRTEM (b, c, e, f) images as well as their SAED patterns (insets) of (a–c) CZY-CTAB-120 and (d–f) CZY-CTAB-160. Reprinted from [156] with permission.
3.2.2.3 Nanotubes

Nanotube research has become a hot spot in the material science field because of several reasons [158-160]. First of all, nanotubes with sufficient small dimensions possess high specific surface areas, good atomic efficiencies, rapid response to reaction conditions, and high activities in catalyst systems. Secondly, the tubular nanostructure may endow itself additional advantages, such as high thermal and chemical and structural stability. Finally, these structures may lead to completely new applications in nanotechnology, for example, if the nanotubes can be aligned. CZO nanotubes can be prepared via template (CNTs, polycarbonate, etc.)-assisted and hydrothermal methods. Fuentes and Baker et al. [161] synthesized CZO nanotubes with CeO2 contents of 50 mol%, 70 mol%, and 90 mol% using polycarbonate membrane with pore diameter of 800 nm as template. The obtained nanotubes were 1–8 μm in length, 500 nm in diameter, and 20 nm in wall thicknesses, as shown in Fig. 10. Lee et al. [162] prepared zirconium-doped ceria nanotubes by mixing Ce(NO3)3·6H2O and zirconium dioxide powder in NaOH solution under hydrothermal conditions. The influence of zirconium on the growth of ceria nanotubes was also investigated, and the Kirkendall effect would affect the formation of nanotube structure. They reported a straightforward synthesis method of CZO nanotubes with high yield, several hundred nm in length, ~52 nm in average pore size, and 76 m2/g in specific surface area. Moreover, the nanotubes possessed inner diameter ranging from 30 to 50 nm, and wall thickness was about 15 nm.

Fig. 10. SEM images of (a, b) Ce0.5Zr0.5O2, (c–f) Ce0.7Zr0.3O2, and (g–i) Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 at low magnification, showing the high yield of nanotubes; at intermediate magnification, showing the structure of individual nanotubes, including several tubes viewed end-on; and at high magnification, showing the nanoparticulate nature of the nanotube walls. Reprinted from [161] with permission.
3.2.3 2-D cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions

Sanchez et al. [163] prepared a highly linearly mesoporous CZO thin film with 2–4 nm pores by a one-step method. This kind of material exhibited highly thermal stability, which still retained their structural integrity even after crystallization and thermal treatment at 700 ℃. Niklasson et al. [164] fabricated CZO films by the SG method. Cerium nitrite together with zirconium oxychloride was dissolved in ethanol to prepare precursor solutions. Veszelei et al. [165] prepared CZO films by reactive direct current magnetron cosputtering. The films could remain completely transparent under repeated Li+ and electron insertion/extraction and were, therefore, of much interest as counter electrodes in transparent optoionic devices such as smart window. Brezesinski et al. [166] synthesized mesostructural thin films of CZO using a novel type of amphiphilic block copolymer as template, and the films possessed highly crystallited pore walls and ordered arrays of mesopores. Zelcer et al. [167] adopted a straightforward and reproducible way to prepare CexZr1-xO2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.5) thin films with linearly mesoporous structure. Zr(PrO)4 and CeCl3·7H2O were used as the inorganic sources, acetylacetone as stabilizing agent, and F127 as pore template. Janek et al. [168] reported a series of ordered mesoporous thin films of CZO with 17 nm diameter pores and nanocrystallite walls. The mesoporous oxide films were thermally stable and still kept their structure up to 600 ℃.

Dai et al. [156] synthesized a bowknot-like Ce0.6Zr0.3Y0.1O2 entity, consisting of a variety of nano- and microslices with 2–6 μm in width and 5–10 μm in length, by adopting the strategy of P123-assisted hydrothermal treatment. These nano- and microslices were aligned along the reverse orientation of the center of the microbowknot, forming rather coarse surfaces of the ends of a microbowknot.

3.2.4 3-D cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions
3.2.4.1 Nanocages

CZO nanocages may exhibit excellent catalytic performance owing to the special morphology and may be also employed as novel nanoreactors due to the hollow structure. Li et al. [169] fabricated monodisperse CeO2 spheres via a hydrolysis process, which then were employed as precursors and reacted with zirconium(IV) to prepare CZO nanocages with controlled compositions, sizes, and shapes according to a modified Kirkendall effect. Fig. 11 exhibited that the materials showed a special nanocage morphology which possessed high surface areas of 142 m2/g for nearly cubic nanocages, and 183 m2/g for spherical nanocages, respectively. Xu and Huang et al. [170] prepared the uniform monodisperse CZO nanocages with an apparent interior void. The diameters of the nanocages were about 80–100 nm.

Fig. 11. (a-c) TEM images of spherical CZO nanocages with different magnifications, (d-f) TEM images of nearly cubic-like CZO nanocages with different magnifications. Reprinted from [169] with permission.
3.2.4.2 3-D mesoporous cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions

Nanocrystallite structured materials are desired in the practical applications due to their high surface area and special porous structure. 3-D mesoporous materials with high specific surface area, highly ordered channels, and narrow pore size distribution have provoked intensive interest, thus widespread application on catalysis. 3-D mesoporous Ce-based materials were reported in the 1990s. This material shows a broad arrangement of mesopores in the region of 2–8 nm with an optimal value at around 3.5–4.0 nm, and surfactants are significantly important to obtain high surface area mesoporous ceria because they can lower the surface tension of water in the pores during drying [171]. Many methods were developed to synthesize mesoporous ceria and CZO with crystallite framework, including self-assembly [97, 172], direct hydrothermal synthesis [173], and hard-template assisted method [174, 175].

Deshpande et al. [176] synthesized a series of CZO beads via a nanocasting approach by employing commercially available PS beads as templates. The as-prepared materials offered advantages of ease of handling and recovery and good flow properties. Moreover, the materials retained a high compositional homogeneity even after thermal treatment, and the surface area after calcination at 500 ℃ was in the range of 78–113 m2/g. Other nanocasting techniques have also been reported that siliceous KIT-6 was employed as the template [177]. As expected, relatively high surface area was achieved (> 163 m2/g) despite of high calcination temperatures for example 550 ℃. And the aging temperature of the siliceous template was of importance because it was directly related to both the pore size and specific surface area of the target materials. The as-prepared 3-D mesoporous CZO was used for the complete oxidation of naphthalene and exhibited higher catalytic activity than CeO2. Additionally, these mesoporous CZO oxides also demonstrated a high stability. Lu et al. [178] synthesized mesoporous Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 solid solution via combining CP and self-assembly methods. Thereupon, the solid solution consisted of homogeneous nanocrystals with uniform mesopores of ca. 4 nm and showed highly thermal stability. Moreover, different surfactants had little influence on the mesoporous structures. Although many methods are developed, further research is still needed, which should be concentrated on how to improve the mesopore regularity and raise the tolerated maximum temperature.

3.2.4.3 Macroporous cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions

3DOM materials have attracted much attention because of their peculiar structure and wide application in photonic crystal, catalysis, and separation science. To date, the main technique for 3DOM material synthesis is the template-assisted method. Colloidal crystals are usually used to prepare ordered macroporous materials with controlled pore size. Li et al. [179, 180] employed PS microspheres as templates and CA as complexing agent to prepare 3DOM CeO2 via the SG method and reported the synthesis of 3DOM ZrO2 by two steps. They prepared 3DOM carbon framework by using SiO2 as templates, and then ZrOCl2 was impregnated on the carbon framework. The final 3DOM product was obtained after the removal of carbon framework under a high-temperature condition.

Zhao et al. [99-102, 181-184] carried out research on CZO with 3DOM morphology. 3DOM CZO was synthesized by the CCT method using EG-methanol solution of Ce(NO3)3·6H2O and ZrOCl2·8H2O as precursor solution. To obtain 3DOM metal oxides, the solidification of these salts was necessary before the removal of PMMA. The heteropolynuclear complex containing cerium and zirconium ions using EG-methanol solution as solvent was formed at low temperature during the dry process, indicating that the solidification of the two salts occurred. The inorganic precursors were introduced to CCT and permeated the voids between the close-packed spheres, and condensed into a hard inorganic framework upon drying. After removal of excessive liquid, drying at room temperature for 12 h, and calcination at 550 ℃ for 5 h, a 3DOM CZO material possessing perfect crystal phase was obtained.

3.2.4.4 Hierarchically porous cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions

Arandiyan et al. [185] reported a facile dual-template synthesis of Pt NPs supported on 3DOM-structured Ce0.6Zr0.3Y0.1O2 (3DOM CZY) with nanovoid-like or mesoporous skeletons. It was based on the use of a CTAB-assisted gas bubbling reduction route with H2PtCl6/NaBH4 and P123 as soft template and well-arrayed colloidal crystal PMMA microspheres as hard template to generate a 3DOM structure, as shown in Fig. 12. Pt/3DOM CZY catalysts possessed great utility because of their high surface area, diverse composition, crystallinity, thermal and chemical stability, high porosity, and uniform pore size distribution as well as their excellent catalytic performance for CH4 combustion. Huang et al. [186] synthesized hierarchical CZO nanospheres with an outer diameter of about 90 nm by a modified approach (Kirkendall effect). The nanospheres showed uniform and monodisperse characteristic, which could be employed as effective adsorbents for arsenic removal. Yu et al. [187] developed a series of high-efficiency Pd/CexZr1-xO2 (x = 0.2–0.8) catalysts with mesoporous structures and macrochannels by a combined surfactant and CCT method. The non-interconnected macrochannels have a length of 20–60 mm and diameter of 1–2 mm. The high-magnification SEM images revealed that the walls of these macro-channels derived from the packing of fine particles. The intraparticle spacing was related well to the mesopores in the product and hence both macro and meso-textural structures coexisted in the system. Wei et al. [188] innovatively fabricated a series of 3-D ordered meso-macroporous PdCo/CZO catalysts by a combined CCT and EISA method, in which F127 and PMMA were used as mesopore and macropore templates, respectively. The resulting catalysts show ~240 nm in macropore diameter and ~5 nm in mesopore.

Fig. 12. SEM images of 3DOM CZY support and y% Pt/3DOM CZY and Bulk CZY catalysts. (a) PMMA colloidal crystal; (b) 3DOM CZY; (c) 3DOM CZY; (d) 0.6% Pt/3DOM CZY; (e) 0.6% Pt/3DOM CZY; (f) 0.6% Pt/3DOM CZY. Reprinted from [185] with permission.
3.2.5 Other morphology

The other special morphology has been successfully synthesized and studied, such as flower-like, bowknot-like, core-shell and so on. This greatly broadened the application area of nanosize CZO materials. Li et al. [189] synthesized CZO flower-like nanostructures via the electrochemical deposition technique. By tailoring the electrodepositon conditions, various CZO flower-like structures were readily prepared, as shown in Fig. 13. CZO may be greatly influenced by different surfactants used. Zhang et al. [156] prepared a series of CZY with different morphology via hydrothermal treatment, in which P123 or CTAB surfactants were employed and the reaction time and temperature were regulated. The morphology of the as-prepared products included rods, spheres, bowknot-like shape, and octahedral shape.

Fig. 13. SEM images of CZO flower-like nanostructures prepared in solution of 0.02 mol/L Ce(NO3)3 + 0.005 mol/L Zr(NO3)4 + 0.1 mol/L NH4NO3 with current density of 2 mA/cm2. Reprinted from [189] with permission.

Core-shell structure nanosize CZO is a good material for ion conductivity. In order to introduce more conductive interfaces, Li et al. [190] synthesized the doped CZO core-shell nanocomposites via a simple and cost-saving SG method. Nitrates, CA, and PEG were used as the starting materials, and the compositions of the core and the shell parts were Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 and 8 mol% Sc2O3-doped ZrO2, respectively. The grain size of core and shell was 6 and 8 nm, respectively. The core-shell nanostructure contained about 60 nm diameter core and about 20 nm thick shell. Ozawa et al. [191] prepared core-shell type CZO support by precipitation of CeO2 NPs followed by heat treatment at 800 ℃ on pure zirconia surface. Li et al. [169] prepared CeO2@CZO nanocages with different morphology by Kirkendall effect using the colloid ceria clusters as both chemical precursors and physical templates. This approach showed great flexibility in controlling the compositions, shapes, and sizes of the solid solution.

3.2.6 Summary of cerium-zirconium-based material with different morphology

To date, nanosize cerium-zirconium-based materials with ordered space morphology have attracted much attention due to their special and remarkable physicochemical properties in different areas. The ordered morphology includes nanopowders, 1-D nanorods, nanotubes, nanobelts, nanowires and 2-D nanofilms, nanomembranes, nanopaltes and 3-D nanocages, 3-D mesoporous, macroporous and hierarchical pores. In addition, many other special morphologies have been reported, and the synthesis routes and techniques are also different. Based on the nanosize morphology, space ordered structures for CZO materials have been developed for different applications. CZO materials have been widely used in heterogeneous catalysis because of their remarkable redox properties. However, as for the research of CZO materials with different morphology, some work should be still improved: (a) stability and mechanic strength of the as-synthesized materials; (b) environmentally friendly synthesis route exploring; (c) morphology dependence factors, such as reaction time, temperature, pH value, concentration of cerium and zirconium source, raw material configuration, metal doping, etc; (d) physicochemical properties of CZO nanomaterials with different morphologies; (e) correlation among structures, morphologies, and catalytic performance of CZO nanomaterials.

4 Cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions for heterogeneous catalytic reactions
4.1 Cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions for catalytic oxidation of environmental pollutants

CZO is a common active component used for the preparation of automotive exhaust TWCs catalysts for oxidation and reduction of combustion byproducts. CO, NOx, and uncombusted HC can be transformed into environmentally friendly forms by tailoring their oxidation states. CZO serves as an 'oxygen reservoir' in which concurrent oxidation/reduction reactions take place, either removing oxygen to create oxygen vacancies or storing it to fill the vacancies in the solid material. In most cases, CZO porous solid is supported with metal NPs (Cu, Ag, Au, Pt, Pd), which can promote oxygen transport into and out of the 'reservoir'. For CZO-supported metal catalysts, factors such as metal type, CZO particle size, Ce/Zr ratio, pretreatment conditions, preparation method, dopants, and choice of the support may affect the catalytic activities of the final catalysts [192-196].

4.1.1 CO oxidation

Although CO oxidation is a conceptually simple reaction, it is very important to meet the rigorous environmental regulations. It is also a vital reaction occurring in the preferential oxidation of CO (CO-PROX) in a hydrogen purification system connected to polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells [197-200]. Therefore, a great amount of work has been devoted to this aspect, as summarized in Table 3.

Table 3
Catalytic activities of nanosize CZO materials for CO oxidation.
4.1.1.1 Effect of the material composition

The different Ce/Zr ratios markedly affect the catalytic activity of CO oxidation over CZO catalysts. Meeyoo et al. [94] found that CO oxidation activity was strongly dependent on Ce/Zr ratio because of the difference in phase compositions of the mixed oxides. The cubic fluorite structure mainly existed in Ce1-xZrxO2 (where x < 0.5) and tetragonal phase was found in Ce1-xZrxO2 (where x > 0.5). The former phase could be reduced easily than the latter one. Trovarelli et al. [201] proposed that the catalytic activities of CZO were dependent on textural properties and composition of samples. The rate of CO2 formation under stationary conditions was almost proportional to the amount of ceria, whereas, under cyclic feed stream conditions the rate reached a maximum when CeO2 was within the range of 50 mol%–80 mol%. Zhao et al. [202] reported that the zirconium-doped CeO2-supported cobalt catalysts were more active than the pure CeO2 and ZrO2-supported cobalt ones (Co3O4/CeO2 and Co3O4/ZrO2). When the ratio was 0.85–0.95, especially 0.85, the Co3O4/Ce0.85Zr0.15O2 catalyst exhibited much higher catalytic activity than the others.

Reddy et al. [203] investigated the effect of Tb, Pr, and Hf dopant cations on the structure and catalytic properties of nanosize CZO-supported Pd catalysts for CO oxidation. They found that CO oxidation activity strongly relied on the nature of the dopant cations, and Pr cation incorporating CZO exhibited the best activity when being calcined at 800 ℃. The catalytic activity was closely related to the redox couples Pr4+/Pr3+ and calcination temperature.

Ayastuy et al. [204] investigated CexZr1-xO2 (x = 0–1.0) supported copper oxide catalysts for CO oxidation and found that the catalytic activity of this system depended on the amount of active sites located at the copper-ceria interface, which decreased with increasing of ZrO2 loading amounts particularly for ZrO2 > 50%. The optimum activity in CO oxidation was observed for the CuO/CeO2 catalyst. Linear correlations were found for ceria-containing catalysts between pre-exponential factor and surface Ce/Cu ratio, and a compensation effect also exhibited between pre-exponential factor and Ea, as displayed in Fig. 14. Chen et al. [205] prepared a series of CuO/CexZr1-xO2 (x = 0.1–0.5) catalysts for CO oxidation. The catalytic activity for CO oxidation increased with the decrease of the amount of incorporating Zr4+, and 7% CuO/Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 exhibited the best catalytic activity.

Fig. 14. (A) Linear dependency of lnA0 with catalyst composition (Ce/Cu ratio); (B) Constable-Cremer plot for CO oxidation over CuO/CexZr1−xO2 catalysts. Reprinted from [204] with permission.

It is reported that the catalytic activity of CZO is strongly influenced by the crystal structure, defects and Ce content, the degree of reducibility, and the mobility of oxygen in the bulk. Despite all these implications, inadequate textural/structural stability and mechanical strength and fall of specific surface area at high temperatures are some problems encountered in the case of unsupported CZO, because many applications require high temperatures. Stabilization of CZO on an inert support to form stable and active catalysts is an effective way to overcome these drawbacks. Reddy et al. [206] synthesized CZO dispersed over Al2O3, SiO2, and TiO2 by the CP method and studied the influence of various supports on the thermal stability, OSC, and CO oxidation activity. Al2O3-supported CZO showed the best performance, followed by TiO2- and SiO2-supported systems. The OSC properties exhibited a strong influence on the catalytic performances of ceria-based nanocomposite oxides for CO oxidation.

4.1.1.2 Effect of the pore structure

The different pore structure of CZO affects the dispersion of active species of reactant molecules and the diffusion. Luo et al. [207] synthesized a series of mesoporous CuO/CZO catalysts to be investigated for CO oxidation. Mesoporous CuO/CZO was much more active than non-mesoporous CuO/CZO in CO oxidation because of its higher oxygen vacancy concentration and structural defects, larger surface area (181 m2/g) and better chemical homogeneity. Zhang et al. [208] prepared a series of Co3O4/meso-CexZr1-xO2 (x = 0.75–1.0) catalysts using cationic surfactant CTAB and anionic surfactant ammonium dodecylbenzenesulfonate as structure-directing agent. Co3O4/meso-Ce0.85Zr0.15O2 catalysts showed an outstanding catalytic activity for CO-PROX reaction. Moreover, compared to the conventional Co3O4/CZO catalysts with the same composition [202], Co3O4/meso-CZO with orderly mesoporous architecture displayed higher CO oxidation activity and CO2 selectivity, which should be due to the presence of mesoporous structure affecting the cobalt oxide dispersion and redox behavior of catalyst. Yu et al. [187] reported a series of meso- and macroporous Pd/CexZr1-xO2 (x = 0.2–0.8) catalysts using the surfactant template-assisted method. The meso-macrostructural Pd/CexZr1-xO2 showed a higher CO oxidation activity than that with mesochannel structures and the one prepared by the CP method due to the high homogeneity of crystal phase, more oxygen vacancies available, and large specific surface area.

4.1.1.3 Mechanism of CO oxidation over ceria-zirconium-based solid solutions

Liu et al. [209] reported that Zr was not effective for CO oxidation reaction. Yang et al. [210] and Tang et al. [211] revealed that Zr had almost no influence on the electronic structure of ceria. Therefore, CeO2 has been widely used to represent CZO for simplicity to investigate the reaction mechanism that CO oxidation involved. A detailed CO oxidation mechanism over CZO was proposed by Trovarelli et al. [212]. It is supposed that CO2 chemisorption should be statistically favored on CeO2 rather than on CZO mixed oxides due to its more Ce3+ sites. In fact, ZrO2 can only weakly adsorb CO or CO2 and usually is not capable of forming stable carbonates. Moreover, preferential adsorption on pure CeO2 could also be dependent on the properties of the adsorption sites. Furthermore, it was reported that the most stable surface for polycrystallite high surface area ceria was (111) among the three low index surfaces, namely CeO2 (111), (110), and (100). After reduction this surface relaxed with a vacancy association mechanism. This mechanism could account for highly unsaturated sites onto which CO2 would be preferentially adsorbed. Vacancy association had lower probability to occur in CZO due to the higher mobility resulting from the addition of a smaller cation in the lattice. Finally, zirconia could stabilize other surfaces with reactivity characteristics different from those of the (111) plane. The following five steps were proposed to account for CO oxidation reaction (Eqs. (5)–(9)):

(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)

Among which, the initial two steps accounted for CO oxidation. In Eq. (5), CO2 entered gas phase, while Eq. (6) accounted for the adsorption of CO2 as carbonate-like species. The rate of the two competing steps determined the intensity and the ratio of the two peaks, which were strongly dependent on the composition and specific surface area of the oxide. Eqs. (7)–(9) expressed the phenomena observed during the second half of the cycle: oxygen adsorption during the second half cycle was expressed in Eqs. (7) and (8), and reaction (9) was the reoxidation step. Moreover, it was assumed that Eq. (8) was the rate-limiting step in the oxygen dissociative adsorption process, while Eq. (7) was instantaneous. Thus, the rates of Eqs. (7) and (9) determined the observed time lag between oxygen consumption and CO2 release.

4.1.2 NO oxidation

NO oxidation to NO2 under O2-rich condition is attracting more and more attention as it is involved in many diesel de-pollution processes such as: (a) NSR strategy, where a noble metal/alkaline-earth oxide component accomplishes NOx storage and the subsequent reduction to N2 by adding a reducing gas in the exhaust [213]; (b) NO2-assisted soot combustion, where NO2 initiates and continues along with O2 to promote soot oxidation even under loose contact between catalyst and soot [214]; and (c) SCR of NOx, where NOx are selectively reduced in an O2-rich environment. CZO showed extremely attractive as possible substitutes of noble metals for catalytic applications where NO oxidation to NO2 must be accomplished [215].

4.1.2.1 Effect of the support composition

Among the various physicochemical properties, the surface composition appears to be the most relevant one influencing the NO oxidation capacity of CZO. García-García et al. [216] prepared two CZO with a ceria-rich and zirconia-rich surface, respectively. They found that the phase composition seemed not to be the direct factor affecting the catalytic activity for NO oxidation (as shown in Fig. 15), and that the formation of a proper solid solution prevented important surface segregation of Zr upon calcination at high temperature.

Fig. 15. NO2 production profiles during TPR experiments for NO + 1/2O2 reaction. (a) Ceria-rich catalysts; (b) Zirconia-rich catalysts. Double arrow (as symbol): NO2. Reprinted from [216] with permission.

Zhong et al. [217] reported Cr/CZO NPs with nonuniform dopant concentration of Ce and Cr enriched on the surface as NO oxidizing catalysts. Nonuniform dopant concentration promoted the utilization of Ce and Cr, and the strong polar ability of Zr in the aqueous solution made it become the nucleation site in the hydrolysis process, resulting in Ce enriched on the surface. The adsorption of Cr by the porous structure of CZO during the impregnation resulted in nonuniform. Zr-rich sample with tetragonal structure was favorable for the increasing of surface area and the decreasing of particle size and led to a higher adsorption capacity of NO and O2 than Ce-rich sample.

4.1.2.2 Effect of the different preparation conditions

Zhong et al. [218] prepared the rigid benzene-muti-carboxylate ligand-modified Cr/CZO for NO oxidation. The catalyst prepared with cinnamic acid as precipitant exhibited a larger specific surface area, a lower band gap, and a stronger ability to adsorb reactant gas. By contrast, Cr/CZO synthesized with terephthalic and trimesic acid was unbeneficial for the preparation of CZO owing to the long distance between the carboxyl groups. Subsequently, they studied the effect of precursor solution of cinnamic acid as complex ligand for the preparation of Cr-doped Ce0.2Zr0.8O2 on the oxidation activity of NO [219, 220]. The solvent with appropriate polarity could decrease the band gap of the catalysts and benefit for more generation of Ce3+ and Cr6+ on the catalyst surface, which was beneficial to the adsorption of NO and O2. Moreover, Zhong et al. [221] synthesized Co/CZO using citrate acid as complexing agent and by an impregnation method. The sample prepared by the former method showed better catalytic performance for NO oxidation than that synthesized by the latter one due to its lower crystallite size, higher content of Ce3+, and easier reducibility.

4.1.3 Volatile organic compounds (voc) elimination

VOC emitted from a large diversity of sources, such as transport and industrial processes as well as household products, are identified as main contributors to air pollution either through their toxic nature and/or as precursors of ozone and photochemical smog [2, 222]. Catalytic oxidation is one of the most useful and economically feasible techniques for the oxidation of VOC into CO2, H2O, and other less harmful compounds [223, 224]. Compared to CO, NO, and CH4 oxidation, fewer studies were devoted to VOC elimination over CZO. It is rather surprising if one considers their very good activity in oxidation reactions. The performance of CZO in eliminating hydrocarbons (alkanes, alkenes, aromatics), alcohols and other oxygenates, and finally miscellaneous compounds will be successively reviewed below, and the results are listed in Table 4.

Table 4
Catalytic activities of VOCs combustion over nanosize CZO materials.
4.1.3.1 Alkanes
4.1.3.1.1 CH4 oxidation

Catalytic combustion of CH4 is an important technology for energy production and environmental pollution abatement. CZO-supported noble metals and transition metals have been widely investigated for CH4 oxidation [48, 225, 226].

(a) Effect of different Ce/Zr ratio

Meeyoo et al. [227] prepared highly uniform Ce1-xZrxO2 (x = 0–1.0) materials via urea hydrolysis for CH4 combustion. The incorporation of Zr into CeO2 lattice promoted the reductive behavior. The CH4 combustion activity of the mixed oxides was closely related to the Ce/Zr ratio, and Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 showed the highest activity for CH4 combustion with T50 about 540 ℃. Luo et al. prepared CexZr1-xO2-supported PdO catalysts (x = 0–1.0) and investigated the effect of Ce/Zr ratio on the catalytic activity for CH4 oxidation [228]. PdO/ZrO2 was more active than PdO/CeO2, and the activity of PdO/Ce0.1Zr0.9O2 was similar to that of PdO/ZrO2. However, the activity of PdO/Ce0.2Zr0.8O2 catalyst decreased remarkably. As the content of Ce increased again (x = 0.3–1.0), the catalytic activity increased, and PdO/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 was the most active for CH4 oxidation in all catalysts. Fu et al. [229] reported a series of y% Pd/CexZr1-xO2/SiO2 (x = 0–1.0, y = 0.1–1.0) catalysts for catalytic CH4 combustion. The Ce/Zr ratio played an important role in the catalytic activity of Pd/CexZr1-xO2/SiO2. 0.5% Pd/Ce0.25Zr0.75O2/SiO2 exhibited the most active for CH4 oxidation in all catalysts, and T50 was obviously lower than the other catalysts.

(b) Effect of CZO-supported different nobel metals

Dai et al. [230] fabricated a series of nanosize polycrystalline y% AuOm/Ce0.6Zr0.3Y0.1O2 (y = 0.2–10.0) using an in-situ reduction procedure with HAuCl4 as Au source, NaBH4 as reductant, and PVP as surfactant. The redox property of y% AuOm/CZY catalysts was significantly improved by the introduction of Au, and AuOm/CZY catalysts with 0.2% Au exhibited the highest catalytic activity for CH4 combustion, which may be ascribed to the synergistic effect between the nanosize Au and CZY nanocrystalline. Moreover, they reported a series of 3DOM Ce0.6Zr0.3Y0.1O2-supported high-dispersion Pt NPs (y% Pt/3DOM CZY, y = 0.6–1.7) with high surface area (84–94 m2/g) and highly dispersed Pt NPs (2.6–4.2 nm). 1.1% Pt/3DOM CZY exhibited the best catalytic performance with 90% CH4 conversion at 598 ℃ (GHSV = 30000 mL/(g∙h)) for CH4 combustion. The apparent activation energy (Ea) was 64 kJ/mol for 1.1% Pt/3DOM CZY, which was much lower than that of 95 kJ/mol over Bulk CZY [188]. Bozo et al. [231] prepared a Ce0.67Zr0.33O2-supported Pt or Pd catalyst for CH4 total oxidation. Deposition of Pt or Pd on this support resulted in a strong increase in activity, and CH4 oxidation took place at low temperature (200–500 ℃). The Pd/Ce0.67Zr0.33O2 catalyst was more active than Pt/Ce0.67Zr0.33O2.

(c) Effect of CZO-supported different transitional metal oxides

Fe2O3/Ce0.67Zr0.33O2-A12O3 for CH4 combustion was reported by Gong et al. [232]. The optimal loading amount of Fe2O3 on Ce0.67Zr0.33O2-A12O3 for catalytic combustion of CH4 was 8%, and the catalyst held the highest activity and the best thermal stability. The complete-conversion temperature of CH4 for fresh and aged samples was 515 and 565 ℃, respectively. Liotta et al. [233] synthesized Co3O4/CZO containing 30% Co3O4 and investigated its catalytic activity on CH4 combustion. The results indicated that Co3O4/CZO exhibited a slightly lower CH4 conversion than Co3O4/CeO2.

(d) Effect of Pretreatment temperatures

Liotta et al. [233] investigated the effect of pretreatment temperature and oxygen concentration on the light-off temperature of CH4 combustion over a Co3O4/CeO2-ZrO2 catalyst. The thermal stability of the catalyst depended on the size of the cobalt oxide crystallites and the oxygen contents. Moreover, the ceria and ceria-zirconia played a key role in inhibiting Co3O4 decomposition into CoO and maintaining a good low-temperature combustion activity by dispersing the active phase Co3O4. Primet et al. [234] investigated the thermal stability of Ce1-xZrxO2 (0 < x < 0.53) materials. After being aged at 1000 ℃ under oxygen and steam, the Ce0.67Zr0.33O2 solid solution exhibited the highest thermal stability, and the Pt/Ce0.67Zr0.33O2 catalyst exhibited a higher activity for CH4 combustion than Pt/Al2O3. However, a deactivation on stream was observed under isothermal conditions in the range of 200–500 ℃. After being aged at 1000 ℃, the positive effect of Ce0.67Zr0.33O2 support was no longer observed.

4.1.3.1.2 Light hydrocarbons oxidation

Cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions were also used for oxidation of other light alkanes, especially for oxidation of C3H8. Weng et al. [235] reported C3H8 oxidation over Ce0.33Zr0.67O2 and Al2O3 supports and investigated the effects of the supports on the catalytic performance of Pd-based catalysts for C3H8 oxidation. The enlargement of the interface between Pd and support during thermal aging might lead to different Pd-support interaction. Furthermore, the light-off temperature for C3H8 oxidation over co-aged Pd/Ce0.33Zr0.67O2 and Al2O3 was lower than that over the mixture of aged Pd/Ce0.33Zr0.67O2 and Al2O3. Meng et al. [236] prepared a series of Pd/CZO-M/Al2O3 (M = Y, Ca or Ba) closed-coupled catalysts by an ultrasonic-assisted successive impregnation method for the total oxidation of C3H8. The introduction of Y greatly enhanced the catalytic activity of the catalysts for C3H8 total oxidation because of the improved dispersion of Pd species and interaction between Pd species and support, which endows Pd species with higher oxidation state. They further investigated the effect of Y loading amounts (0%, 2%, 5%, 10%) on the catalysts for C3H8 combustion [237]. The introduction of 5% Y greatly improved the dispersion of Pd species and promoted the catalytic performance for C3H8 oxidation. However, further increasing the amount of Y led to the decrease of Pd-support interaction, resulting in a slight decrease of Pd 3d5/2 binding energy. Therefore, the chemical state of Pd species could be influenced by Y and its amount, and the catalytic activity for C3H8 oxidation was also affected. Wei et al. [238] investigated the effect of nickel on the Pt/Ce0.4Zr0.6O2 catalyst for C3H8 oxidation and sulfur resistance. The addition of nickel not only increased the specific surface area of the catalyst, but also enhanced its redox property. As a result, the nickel doping catalyst was more active in C3H8 complete oxidation. Furthermore, the introduction of nickel to the catalyst was capable of enhancing the desorption amount of sulfur species under reducing atmosphere. Thereby the sulfur resistance of the Pt/Ce0.4Zr0.6O2 catalyst was improved. De Leitenburg et al. [239] reported a series of CZO doped with Mn and Cu solid solutions for the total oxidation of light hydrocarbons. Both MnOm and CuO at low loading amount were dissolved into CZO lattice, which significantly influenced the reductive behavior of the catalysts by increasing the oxygen mobility, and then the catalytic activity for the total oxidation of light HC was promoted.

4.1.3.2 Alkenes

Alkene combustion was exclusively performed with C3H6 as model compound. D'Itri et al. [240] investigated the effect of sulfation on the structural, morphological, and catalytic properties of Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 solid solution. When Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 was exposed to gaseous mixtures containing 20–40 ppm SO2 at 600 ℃, the crystallite grain size grew accompanied by the loss of surface area. Additionally, the introduction of 20 ppm SO2 into the 1100 ppm C3H6 + 2% O2 + N2 reaction mixture resulted in a promoting effect on the catalytic activity of C3H6 oxidation over CeO2 due to the presence of acid-base interaction between surface hydroxysulfate species and C3H6.

A Ce0.25Zr0.75O2-supported Pd catalyst was prepared for C3H6 oxidation reaction [241]. The catalytic activity of Pd/CZO was strongly influenced by the pretreatment conditions such as oxidative or reductive atmosphere. The initial activity of the Pd/CZO catalyst under the insufficient oxygen condition was equivalent to the activity under the stoichiometric condition because of the property of high OSC. The CZO support promoted the dispersion of Pd oxide particles and their OSC property, which assisted the C3H6 oxidation reaction.

Aouad et al. [242] studied the catalytic behavior of CZO and Ru/CZO calcined at 500 and 600 ℃ for C3H6 oxidation. The reactivity at both temperatures increased with increasing cerium content, and the introduction of Ru greatly enhanced the reactivity of the two solids. The both specific surface area and reductive behavior of the solids affected the catalytic reactivity. However, the reducibilities were the determinant factor in the catalytic behavior where easily reducible solids were more reactive. Ru/CeO2 showed the optimal catalytic performance due to its high specific surface area and amount of Ru-O-Ce species. RuO2 clusters were formed with increasing Zr contents, leading to a decrease in their catalytic activities. When the cerium content increased in the support, a more efficient interaction was observed between cerium and ruthenium oxides. This interaction hindered the formation of RuO2 agglomerates and led to a better dispersion of ruthenium oxides and therefore a better catalytic performance.

4.1.3.3 Aromatics

Except for the report of Zhu et al. [243], which deals with benzene oxidation, all authors have chosen toluene as a model compound of aromatic hydrocarbons. The effect of Pt loading amounts (0.09–1.00%) on the catalytic performance of CZO-supported catalysts in the total oxidation of toluene in air was investigated by Topka et al. [244]. The introduction of Pt facilitated the reduction of surface cerium and decreased the acidity of the catalysts. The catalysts with 0.59% Pt showed the best catalytic activity because of the presence of highly dispersive Pt NPs. Zhao et al. [245] investigated a Pd/Ce0.4Zr0.602/substrate washcoat catalyst for toluene combustion. The Pd/Ce0.4Zr0.602/substrate monolithic catalyst after being calcited at 400 ℃ displated good thermal stability and highly catalytic activity, and the conversion of toluene was up to 95% at 210 ℃. Dai et al. [246] prepared y% Au/Ce0.6Zr0.3Y0.1O2 (y% Au/CZY, y = 0.4–4.7) using the CTAB-assisted hydrothermal and PVP-protected reduction methods for the oxidation of toluene. 4.7% Au/CZY exhibited the best catalytic performance at a space velocity of 20000 mL/(g∙h), and T50 was 32 ℃ for CO oxidation and 218 ℃ for toluene oxidation, respectively. It should be attributed to its higher oxygen adspecies concentration, superior low-temperature reducibility, and better Au NPs dispersion. Deactivation by water vapor addition was reversible due to the competitive adsorption of H2O and toluene as well as oxygen on the catalyst surface. Ea values (39–53 kJ/mol) obtained over y% Au/CZY were much lower than that (88 kJ/mol) over CZY for toluene oxidation. Subsequently, they prepared CZY nanorods and supported Au and Pd alloy NPs [247]. 0.9% Au1Pd2/CZY exhibited the best catalytic activity, and T50 was 190 ℃ at a space velocity of 20000 mL/(g∙h). The active sites might be the surface oxygen vacancies on CZY, oxidized noble metal NPs, and/or interfaces between noble metal NPs and CZY. Ea values (37–43 kJ/mol) over 0.90%–0.93% AumPd/CZY were much lower than that (88 kJ/mol) over CZY for toluene oxidation. Yuan et al. [248] prepared mesoporous CZO using the surfactant template-assisted method, and then it was used as support of CuO NPs for catalytic total oxidation of toluene. CuO/CZO catalysts exhibited a wormhole-like mesoporous structure with high specific surface area and uniform pore diameter, and CuO NPs were highly dispersive on the CZO surface. 8% CuO/Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 calcined at 400 ℃ showed the best catalytic activity due to the interfacial interaction between CuO and CZO support and highly dispersive CuO NPs as well as the nature of the support.

4.1.3.4 Alcohols and other oxygenates

Methanol combustion was investigated by Ziolek et al. [249] over CeO2, ZrO2, and mixed CZO mesoporous oxides-supported Au and Cu. The electronic state of Au and the mobility of metals and oxygen from the support played a vital role in the combustion of methanol at low temperature. In addition, the activation temperature strongly affected the mobility of surface oxygen and the oxidation states of the cationic components, which played the role of Lewis acid sites and thereby strongly influenced the activity and selectivity of methanol oxidation. Moreover, the catalytic decomposition of methanol to H2 and CO was another efficient route. Chen and Liu et al. [250, 251] reported catalytic decomposition of methanol to CO and H2 over Pd/Ce0.65Zr0.30La0.05O2 and Pd/CexZr1-xO2 (x = 0–0.5). All Pd-containing catalysts exhibited high selectivity to synthesis gas, among which the methanol conversion achieved 100% at 220 ℃ over Pd/Ce0.65Zr0.30La0.05O2.

The ethanol complete oxidation over Mn0.1Ce0.9Ox and Mn0.1Ce0.6Zr0.3Ox complex compounds was studied by Wang et al. [252]. T50 was lower over Mn0.1Ce0.9Ox (247 ℃) than that over Mn0.1Ce0.6Zr0.3Ox (280 ℃) for the fresh samples. For the aged samples, however, T50 over Mn0.1Ce0.6Zr0.3Ox was lower than that over Mn0.1Ce0.9Ox solid solution. The addition of Zr to Mn0.1Ce0.9Ox significantly improved its thermal stability, therefore, retaining its catalytic activity for the ethanol oxidation reaction. The effect of dopants (M = Mn, Y, La) on MnOm/Al2O3/Ce0.45Zr0.45M0.10Oy for the catalytic combustion of ethanol was investigated by Chen et al. [253]. The catalytic activity of the MnOm/Al2O3/Ce0.50Zr0.50O2 monolithic catalyst was promoted by doping Mn, Y, and La into Ce0.50Zr0.50O2. MnOm/Al2O3/Ce0.45Zr0.45Y0.10O1.95 exhibited the best catalytic performance with 100% ethanol conversion temperature at 230 ℃. The catalytic activity of Au versus Pt on CZO in oxidation of ethanol was compared by Gaálová et al. [254]. Pt catalysts were more active in ethanol oxidation than Au catalysts due to their better reductive behavior and higher amount of basic centers. On the other hand, the Au catalysts exhibited the better selectivity in ethanol oxidation.

Ce0.6−xZr0.4MnxO2 solid solutions were used for the butanol total oxidation [255]. The textural and redox properties were improved when Mn content increased in the material, especially for x = 0.36, which was the most active in the butanol oxidation because of its high surface Mn4+ concentration and oxygen mobility.

Pagadala et al. [256] reported a versatile reusable heterogeneous CZO/SiO2 catalyst synthesized by a very practical C–C and C–O bond forming reaction. This catalyst was superb for benzyl alcohols oxidation under the solvent-free liquid-phase condition and was reusable with no loss of catalytic activity even after multiple cycles.

Oxidations of esters were studied over non-noble metal catalysts. Xu et al. [257] reported a series of CeO2 and/or ZrO2-TiO2-supported copper oxide catalysts for catalytic ethyl acetate combustion. CZO-promoted TiO2 greatly improved the dispersion of CuO phase, which then enhanced the catalytic activity and prevented the formation of by-products. The complete combustion of ethyl acetate was observed at 270 ℃ over a 5% CuO/CZO-TiO2 catalyst. A series of CuCexZr1-xOy/ZSM-5 (x = 0-1.0) catalysts were reported by Dou et al. [258], and their catalytic performance was tested for ethyl acetate abatement. The optimal performance was obtained with the CuCe0.75Zr0.25Oy/ZSM-5 catalyst, which achieved total combustion of ethyl acetate at 270 ℃ and the onset temperature as low as 110 ℃. Moreover, this catalyst exhibited remarkable stability, and no deactivation phenomenon was noted after a long-term catalytic reaction for 60 h at 270 ℃. Apart from Cu-based CZO catalysts, doping other metals (Mn, Y) into CZO affected the activity for ethyl acetate catalytic combustion [259]. The Mn doping greatly increased the OSC of the oxygen-storage materials (OSMs), whereas doping Y decreased the reduction temperature of catalysts. The doping of Mn and Y combined the advantages of Mn and Y. MnOm/Ce0.40Zr0.40Mn0.10Y0.10Oy/Al2O3 gave the best catalytic performance, which achieved complete conversion of ethyl acetate at 240 ℃, and the temperature range between the initial conversion and complete conversion was the smallest. Mn and Y entered the lattice of CZO, which modified their textural properties and greatly improved the dispersion of MnOm active phase on the support surface.

4.1.3.5 Chlorinated VOC and other Cl-containing compounds

Chlorohydrocarbon is one of the primary air pollutants, which has superior stability and toxicity and is emitted from various sources. Therefore, great efforts have been made to eliminate these compounds. Oxidation of chlorinated hydrocarbons (CHC) can produce HCl (Eq. (10)) or Cl2 (Eq. (11)):

(10)
(11)

The ratio between HCl and Cl2 can be controlled by the Deacon equilibrium (Eq. (12)):

(12)

This is an exothermic reaction (Δr = 58.4 kJ/mol at 350 ℃). Chlorine is produced in higher concentration at low temperature. For environmental reasons, it is preferable to orientate the reaction toward HCl, more easily eliminated by soda washing. Whatever the product, HCl or Cl2, the oxidation catalyst has to work under severe conditions, generally leading to rapid deactivation. Catalyst stability is an essential parameter for VOC oxidation processes involving chlorinated hydrocarbons. CZO plays a key role in the abatement of chloroorganics.

Gutierrez-Ortiz et al. [260] studied the chlorinated hydrocarbons (1, 2-dichloroethane and trichloroethylene) oxidation over a series of CZO and found that the surface acidity and lattice oxygen of the catalyst were responsible for the chlorohydrocarbons oxidation. The optimum performances were achieved over the zirconia-rich system. Matějová et al. [261] prepared Ce0.5Zr0.5O2-supported Pt and Au catalysts for the total oxidation of dichloromethane. The introduction of Pt and Au on the Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 support significantly promoted the redox behavior of surface ceria particular for Pt-based catalysts, but it led to the loss of catalyst acidity. As a result, the noble metal catalysts exhibited lower catalytic performance than Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 in dichloromethane total oxidation due to the decreases of acid sites for chlorinated compounds. Moreover, Pt-based catalysts showed considerably high CO2 selectivity compared with the Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 support.

Gutiérrez-Ortiz et al. [262] prepared a series of sulphated CZO using sulphuric acid and nitric acid for the oxidative decomposition of dichloroethane. The catalyst showed a superior catalytic activity at a reaction temperature of dichloroethane decomposition as low as 80 ℃. The increased acidity of CZO was responsible for its excellent activity. Li et al. [263] investigated the catalytic oxidation of 2-chlorophenol over a Ru/CZO catalyst. The mobility of the lattice oxygen was significantly promoted by the addition of Ru, which greatly enhanced the catalytic activity of the catalyst. González-Velasco et al. [264] studied the catalytic oxidation of dichloroethane and trichloroethylene over CZO in the presence and absence of n-hexane. The catalytic activity of the catalyst for the chlorinated organics oxidation was dependent on the Ce/Zr molar ratio, surface acidity, and OSC of CZO. CZO exhibited higher activity than pure CeO2 in the elimination of chlorohydrocarbons in the absence of n-hexane. In the presence of n-hexane, however, an increase in the ignition temperature was observed over CZO. Furthermore, the introduction of n-hexane led to the formation of H2O in its combustion process, which was responsible for the increased selectivity to HCl.

Rivas et al. [265] investigated trichloroethylene oxidation over CZO prepared by the CP method. The catalyst with the most acidity displayed the highest activity. A mechanism for the dechlorination reaction was also proposed, in which the adsorption of trichloroethylene onto catalyst surface is the rate-limiting step, in agreement with that reported by Feijen-Jeurissen et al. [266]. Gutierrez-Ortiz et al. [267] investigated 1, 2-dichloroethane decomposition over CrxZr1-xO2 (x = 0–1.0), and the catalytic activity changed with the zirconia content for the samples. Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 exhibited the best performance. A reaction mechanism was proposed based on the in-situ FT-IR spectra. It involved 1, 2-dichloroethane dehydrochlorination on the acidic sites of the catalyst to form vinyl chloride and HCl. Then the vinyl chloride got protonation from the basic species (OH) of catalyst surface, which led to the formation of carbonium ions. Subsequently, these ions were trapped by the nucleophilic oxygen from the catalyst to form chlorinated alkoxide compound and then it decomposed to acetaldehyde. Finally, CO2 and trace amounts of CO were formed by the conversion of acetaldehyde.

4.1.4 Soot combustion

Soot emitted from diesel engine outlets is a main constituent of air pollution. It is closely related to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases as well as skin cell alterations [268]. Therefore, stringent legislation has been implemented to limit soot content from vehicles (e.g., 0.005 g/km for soot from passenger cars in Europe since 2009, and in China since 2018). It has imposed the utilization of catalytic technologies to satisfy the required standards [269, 270]. Among the different alternatives, the entrapment of particulate from exhaust gases by diesel particulate filter (DPF) has attracted much attention in recent years [271-278]. The soot particulates can be burnt off above 600 ℃, however, typical engine exhaust temperatures fall within the 180–400 ℃ range [277-279]. In order to overcome the limitation of alternative regeneration of DPF and prevent from the deposition of particles, oxidation catalysts are developed to improve the combustion activity of soot over DPF. Among which, CZO is efficiently used due to their high mobility of reactive oxygen species and thermal stability [273, 280, 281]. It is now accepted that it exhibits much higher soot oxidation rate in the presence of O2 + NO2 than that in O2 alone. In this section, soot combustion over Ce-Zr-based catalysts is reviewed, as shown in Table 5.

Table 5
Catalytic activities of nanosize CZO materials in soot combustion.
4.1.4.1 Effect of support composition

The effects of specific surface area and OSC of CZO on soot combustion were investigated by Trovarelli et al. [280]. The surface oxygen linked to ceria played a vital role for the catalytic combustion of soot, while OSC could be important when oxidation of soot particles was carried out in the absence or defect of gaseous oxygen. The effects of Ce/Zr ratios on the phase composition and catalytic activities of CZO and Pr/CZO samples for soot combustion were investigated by Bensaid et al. [282], as displayed in Table 5. The role of Zr in stabilizing surface area of ceria was also important when evaluating the effect of composition on soot combustion activity. Fino et al. [283] prepared a series of nanostructured CZO with different Zr contents and structural features for soot combustion. The optimally catalytic performance was obtained for the nano-polyhedra Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 catalyst due to its higher mobility of the lattice oxygen and easier reducibility compared with other catalysts. The substitution of some Zr4+ ions into Ce4+ was favorable for the generation of defects in the ceria lattice, thereby leading to a distortion of the oxygen sublattice. Nevertheless, the amount of redox Ce species decreased with increasing Zr contents. Therefore, it seemed that the substitution of Zr for Ce did not have a direct promotion effect on the oxidation activity of catalysts.

The effect of the rare earth elements-modified CZO on the catalytic combustion of soot was investigated. Aneggi et al. [284] studied the effect of rare earth elements (La, Pr, Sm, Tb) on the textural and structural characteristics of CeO2 and CZO for soot combustion. CeO2 doped with these rare earth elements exhibited more active activities due to the increased oxygen storage, which could provide an alternative route for the oxidation of big soot particles in contact with ceria. However, CZO modified with rare earth elements did not achieve lower combustion temperature, which was comparable to CeO2 and CZO. The role of Pr as dopant for ceria-based catalysts was studied in CO and soot oxidation by Zhao et al. [103]. It appeared that the incorporation of Pr species into CZO framework improved the oxidation activity for CO, while this positive effect was less prominent for soot combustion due to the effect of catalyst morphology. The phase compositions of Pr-modified CZO were similar to those of corresponding CZO samples, and cubic and tetragonal phases coexisted in the samples with moderate zirconia content, which was beneficial to soot combustion. Additionally, the effects of thermal and hydrothermal treatments on the catalytic activities of 3DOM CeO2, Ce0.7Zr0.3O2, and Ce0.6Zr0.3Pr0.1O2 for soot oxidation were comparatively studied. Compared with 3DOM CeO2, 3DOM Ce-Zr-based solid solutions, especially Pr-modified Ce0.6Zr0.3Pr0.1O2 solid solution, showed the highest stability due to its lowest lattice oxygen mobility among the three samples. The relative efficacy of the La promoter in CZO was investigated systematically for soot oxidation at low temperature [285]. The addition of La3+ to ceria promoted the oxidation rate of soot compared with pure ceria and Zr4+-doped ceria. This should be due to the more active oxygen provoked by defective structure of ceria, which was induced by the presence of La3+. The effect of Y doping and loading on the physicochemical properties and soot combustion activity of CZO was investigated by Bueno-López et al. [286]. In tight contact, Ce0.85-xZr0.15YxO2 mixed oxides on the catalytic activity with respect to yttrium. And in loose contact, the catalytic activity was dependent on their specific surface area, and catalysts Ce0.85-xZr0.15YxO2 (10–13 m2/g) were more active than Ce1-xYxO2 (2–3 m2/g). In this loose contact condition, the yttrium doping and loading had a minor or null effect on the activity, and the stabilizing effect of the specific surface area due to zirconium doping prevailed.

4.1.4.2 Effect of preparation method

The catalytic performances of CZO-based materials for soot combustion were influenced by the preparation method. Sang et al. [287] reported a series of Ce0.5Fe0.30Zr0.20O2 catalysts prepared by different methods (CP, SG, physical mixed, impregnation, and hydrothermal method). Fe3+ and Zr4+ were incorporated into ceria lattice to form a homogeneous Ce-Fe-Zr-O solid solution by the CP method, but two kinds of Fe phases existed in Ce-Fe-Zr-O catalysts prepared by other methods: dispersed Fe2O3 clusters and Fe3+ incorporated into CeO2 lattice. The free Fe2O3 clusters could promote the activity of catalysts for soot combustion comparing with Ce-Fe-Zr-O solid solution owing to the synergetic effect between free Fe2O3 and surface oxygen vacancies. In addition, the activity of catalysts considerably relied on the surface reducibility of free Fe2O3 particles. The hydrothermal Ce0.5Fe0.3Zr0.2O2 catalyst displayed the minimum ignition temperature (251 ℃) and maximum oxidation rate temperature (Tm = 310 ℃) for the combustion of soot in tight contact between soot and catalysts. This was due to the both abundant free Fe2O3 particles and high oxygen vacancy concentration. Even after being aged at 800 ℃ for 10 h, Tm still displayed a low value at 361 ℃.

4.1.4.3 Effect of pore structure

It is well known that the conventional ceria-zirconium-based catalysts have smaller pore sizes (< 10 nm) than soot particles (> 20 nm). Therefore, soot particles are difficult to enter the inner pores of these catalysts to access active sites. So how to effectively make use of the inner surface for increasing the contact area between catalysts and soot particles is a key factor to enhance the catalytic activity for the removal of soot. Fino et al. [283] investigated the soot combustion over microporous and mesoporous Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 oxides. Lower soot conversion was achieved for both microporous and mesoporous Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 with similar Ce/Zr ratio. Ce0.9Zr0.1O2 particle catalyst showed the worse activity than the porous materials, which confirmed the important role of the textural properties for soot combustion. 3DOM CZO contains periodic arrays of interconnected macropores [102]. The open, interconnected macroporous structure is a desirable feature for diesel soot combustion. Compared with that of disordered macroporous (DM) catalysts, 3DOM samples facilitate the contact between soot and catalysts and promote the catalytic activity for soot combustion. T50 of 3DOM samples could be lowered by 51 ℃ at most, as shown in Fig. 16. Then, 3DOM CZO-supported Au NPs catalysts were prepared via the gas bubbling-assisted membrane reduction method [288]. This kind of catalysts combined both advantages of good contact between diesel soot and catalyst by 3DOM supports and the highly active sites for the activation of O2 by Au clusters with suitable nanosize, and they exhibited good catalytic performances for the oxidation of soot. 3DOM Au/Ce0.7Zr0.3O2 catalyst showed T50 as low as 375 ℃. In addition, Pr-modified 3DOM CZO was prepared by a CCT method [103]. It was used for the removal of soot and exhibited higher catalytic activities compared with DM ones. This was due to the improved contact efficiency between soot and ordered macroporous structure.

Fig. 16. T50 of Ce1-xZrxO2 catalysts with different macroporous structures versus Zr molar fraction for soot combustion. Reprinted from [102] with permission.

Zaletova et al. [289] reported that hierarchical porous (HP) CZO was prepared using small-size fraction of wood as template for oxidation of diesel soot particulate. HP CZO exhibited higher soot conversion over regular CZO due to its larger surface area, higher amount of mobile lattice oxygen and lower temperature of oxygen release.

4.1.4.4 Effect of active phase

Ru is established as a successful catalytic system in oxidation reactions [290-293]. Nascimento et al. [294] reported the soot combustion over Ru-doped Ce0.4Zr0.6O2 nanopowders in the temperature range of 220–500 ℃. Ce0.4Zr0.6O2 showed good tolerance to water as well as excellent thermal stability. The addition of Ru NPs (8–10 nm) to Ce0.4Zr0.6O2 greatly boosted the reactivity of the mixed binary catalyst due to the increased active oxygen species. Chen and Zheng [295] prepared a mesoporous Ag/CZO catalyst with Ag/Ce structure by the CP method using a mixture of NH3∙H2O and KOH as precipitant. The Ag-Ce interaction led to the increase of Ag+ species, which was favorable for the activation of oxygen species. In addition, it was found that Ag0 species surrounding with Ag+ species was more beneficial to activating the oxygen. While Ag-Ce interface brought about Ag+ species, which would be more effective in transferring the activated oxygen species. Thus, the Ag-based catalyst with optimal Ag-Ce interaction exhibited excellent performance for soot oxidation even in the loose contact mode and in the absence of NOx. And its activity could keep stable for several runs, which was attributed to Ag-Ce interaction along with different distribution of Ag species.

Transition metals, such as Co, Cu and, Mn, are widely used in commercial soot removal systems. Wu et al. [296] investigated the soot catalytic oxidation over Cu doping CeO2/CZO catalysts. Cu modification improved the activity and selectivity of CeO2 and CZO for the catalytic oxidation of soot attributing to the well dispersed copper oxide species strongly interacting with the ceria surface, which might lower the activation energy of soot combustion. Reddy et al. [297] reported CZO-supported Cu catalysts for soot combustion. The introduction of Cu2+ into CZO was benefited to the formation of more structural defects, which accelerated the oxygen diffusion and induced the production of more surface-active oxygen species. It was responsible for the improved low-temperature activity of soot combustion. Chen et al. [298] investigated the effect of Co addition on catalytic performance of Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 mixed oxide for soot combustion. The catalytic activity of the catalyst was effectively improved by the addition of Co with soot due to the existence of synergistic effect between Co and Ce. CZO-based monometallic (CoO/CZO and NiO/CZO) and bimetallic (CuO-CoO/CZO and CuO-NiO/CZO) catalysts were prepared by Reddy et al. [299] and used for soot oxidation. The bimetallic CuO-CoO/CZO catalyst exhibited the best catalytic activity (T50 = 363 ℃) and nearly 100% CO2 selectivity due to the formation of facile reduction and abundant oxygen vacancies as well as the small size of the metal particles and the high specific surface area. Escribano et al. [300] found that the Mn/CZO catalyst showed high activity for soot combustion, producing CO2 and CO as a by-product in the temperature range of 152–452 ℃, and the amount of CO decreased significantly with increasing O2 concentration in the feed gases.

Adding low melting point metal salts can improve the catalytic activity [301], and alkali metals have been reported as a molten salt to promote catalyst-soot contact by increasing surface mobility [102, 302, 303]. Neyertz et al. [279] reported that the introduction of K promoted the catalytic performances of K/CeO2/cordierite and K/Ce0.65Zr0.35O2/cordierite for soot combustion. However, the K/CeO2/cordierite catalyst was more active due to the distribution of Zr on the surface of Ce0.65Zr0.35O2, which decreased the catalytic activity. Zhu et al. [304] investigated the effect of KNO3 loading on Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 for catalytic soot combustion. KNO3 loading on Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 resulted in an distinct enhancement in the catalytic activity due to that KNO3 favored the formation of chemisorbed oxygen and carbonate species (C-O-K), which could react with soot to yield CO2, and the reduced state C-M was reoxidized by O* to reform C-O-K. In addition, Wu and Weng et al. [305] studied the role of CZO in diesel soot oxidation and thermal stability of a potassium catalyst, and they believed KNO3 to be the key factor affecting soot catalytic combustion due to that the nitrate can act as an oxidant of soot being transformed into reduced nitrite species.

Castoldi et al. [306] investigated K- and Ba-doped Ru supported catalysts for the removal of soot in the presence of NOx. 1 wt% Ru-10 wt% AM/MO (AM = Ba or K; MO = Ce0.8Zr0.2O2, ZrO2, Al2O3) catalysts promoted the soot particulate combustion in the presence of NO/O2. The promotion effect for K-based catalysts seemed to be not dependent on the nature of the support, and it appeared to be closely related to the synergic interaction between Ru and K that boosted the combustion of soot at low temperature. K-containing catalysts exhibited very low onset temperature, in the range 220–235 ℃. In addition, all Ru-based samples were able to simultaneously remove NOx and soot when operating under isothermal cycling conditions, i.e., alternating lean-rich phases based on the typical diesel engine NOx reduction strategy. In particular, the materials showed a NOx storage capacity comparable to that of model Pt-based catalysts. NOx storage capacity increased over Ru-based systems in the presence of soot particulate, while for model Pt-containing catalysts a detrimental effect of soot was found. Among all the developed formulations, K-based materials exhibited higher NOx storage capacity and higher soot oxidation activity compared to Ba-containing samples.

4.1.4.5 Mechanisms of soot combustion over nanosize ceria-zirconium-based solid solutions

The combustion of soot over ceria mainly relies on the redox couple. Ce3+/Ce4+ with its ability shifts between Ce2O3 and CeO2, which is associated with the OSC of ceria. The surface oxygen of pure ceria is used for the soot oxidation and the consecutive vacant site is quickly refilled by gaseous/subsurface oxygen. Doped ceria can create more structural defects compared to pure ceria. So, these defects facilitate either more gaseous oxygen to adsorb onto the surface or diffusion of subsurface lattice oxygen onto the surface, thereby enhancing the formation of active oxygen species. It was reported that the rate of this active oxygen transfer to soot is much faster than that of both gas phase oxygen transfer to soot. It is self recombination to give O2, hence plays a crucial role in the soot oxidation. The reaction mechanism for soot combustion in the presence of O2/NO over 3DOM Au/Ce1-xZrxO2 catalysts was investigated by Zhao et al. [101], and they proposed a reaction pathway for soot combustion, as shown in Fig. 17. The synergic effect between Au particle and Ce1-xZrxO2 support played an important role for soot combustion. So far, the accepted mechanism [285, 307, 308] for the catalytic oxidation of soot over cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions involved the following steps:

Fig. 17. Mechanism illustration of soot combustion over 3DOM Au/Ce1-xZrxO2 catalysts at different temperatures in the presence of O2 and NO. Reprinted from [101] with permission.
(13)
(14)
(15)

where Mred and Mox-O represented the reduced and oxidized states of the catalyst, respectively. Gas-O stood for the oxidant gas (O2, CO2, H2O, etc.), Cf denoted a carbon active site or free site on the soot surface, and SOC represented a surface carbon-oxygen complex. In the first step, the catalyst "captured" oxygen from the gas-phase molecules and was itself oxidized. In the second step, the active oxygen on the catalyst transfered/spilled over to the soot and the catalyst was reduced. In the third step, the SOC decomposed to yield CO or CO2.

4.2 Nanosize cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions for selective oxidation of NH3

The removal of NH3 from waste streams is becoming an important issue due to ever increasing environmental concerns [309]. In order to control the NH3 slip, several different techniques have been used for the elimination of NH3, such as adsorption, chemical treatment, catalytic decomposition, and selective catalytic oxidation (SCO) [310-314]. Among which, SCO of NH3 to N2 from oxygen-containing waste gases over CZO is becoming a hot issue in recent years.

4.2.1 Effect of material composition

Qu et al. [315] investigated SCO over Ce1-xZrxO2 (0.2 ≤ x ≤ 0.8) mixed oxides. Compared with pure CeO2 and ZrO2, CZO exhibited more acid sites and higher catalytic activity. Especially, the Ce0.4Zr0.6O2 catalyst displayed the highest NH3 conversion and the lowest total conversion temperature up to 360 ℃, which was associated with the partial phase segregations of ZrO2 in Ce0.2Zr0.8O2. Additionally, zirconium-rich samples (x > 0.4) showed the higher N2 selectivity (~100%), and the formation of N2O was the main reason resulting in the low N2 selectivity for these catalysts (x ≤ 0.4). They further studied Al-promoted Ce0.4Zr0.6O2 mixed oxides in the SCO of NH3 to N2 [316]. The addition of Al to Ce0.4Zr0.6O2 greatly improved the oxidation activity of NH3. Particularly, the 3% Al-Ce0.4Zr0.6O2 catalyst exhibited higher NH3 conversion (12.7%) than the Ce0.4Zr0.6O2 catalyst due to the improved oxygen mobility, reducibility, and oxygen vacancies. Among these, oxygen vacancy was thought to be the essential oxygen adsorption and activation sites. Therefore, more oxygen vacancies facilitated NH3 oxidation reaction.

4.2.2 Effect of active phase types and reaction condition

Qu and Wang et al. [317] prepared a series of Cu/CZO materials by the incipient-wetness impregnation, CA-SG, and homogeneous precipitation methods. Cu/CZO prepared by the CA-SG method exhibited the best NH3-SCO activity owing to its better adsorption capacity, more isolated Cu2+, and active oxygen adspecies. The influence of Ni loading (0, 5%, and 10%), oxygen amounts (λ = 0.25, 0.5), and gas hourly space velocity (50000, 100000, and 150000 h−1) on catalysts for NH3-SCO was investigated by Nassos et al. [318]. 10% Ni/Ce0.9La0.1O2 showed the optimally catalytic activity with 65% and 97% N2 yield at 500 and 750 ℃, respectively. Increasing λ and lowering the gas hourly space velocity led to considerably improved N2 yield at 500 ℃. Qu and Yan et al. [319] synthesized Ru-modified Ce1-xZrxO2 for NH3-SCO. The 0.2% Ru-modified Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 catalyst displayed excellent performance for the SCO of slip NH3, and SO2 could enhance the removal of slip NH3 in the presence of NOx but also slightly supressed NH3 oxidation and significantly improved N2 selectivity to 100% in the absence of NOx, as shown in Fig. 18.

Fig. 18. (a) NH3-SCO efficiency over various catalysts at 350 ℃; (b) N2 selectivity of NH3-SCO with or without SO2 over various catalysts. GHSV = ~3 × 105 h−1, temperature = 350 ℃, 30 ppm of NH3, 30 ppm of NO, 500 ppm of SO2, the other gas including 4% O2 and N2. Reprinted from [319] with permission.
4.2.3 Mechanisms of NH3 oxidation over nanosize ceria-zirconium-based solid solutions

Qu and co-worker [317] proposed that the mechanism of NH3-SCO with lattice oxygen was different from that of gaseous oxygen, which was much less active than gaseous oxygen at low temperature. They suggested that the reaction mechanism of NH3-SCO over Ru/Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 should follow an internal SCR mechanism [319], as shown in Fig. 19, which was in accordance with the results of Breen et al. [320] The adsorbed NH3 was first activated and reacted with lattice oxygen to form a −HNO intermediate. Subsequently, −HNO reacted with O2 to generate NO. Meanwhile, the formed NO interacted with −NH2 to produce N2, and N2O as the byproduct.

Fig. 19. Mechanism of NH3-SCO and the effect of SO2. Reprinted from [319] with permission.
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
4.3 Nanosize cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions for selective reduction of NOx

NOx produced from the combustion of fossil fuels such as coke in the electrical power plants or petroleum in the engines of vehicles brought about ecological and health hazards [321]. The nitrous oxide N2O, not submitted to drastic regulations as NOx, is considered as a nontoxic greenhouse gas. However, its global warming potential is 310 times as that of CO2, and its abatement is often considered as a priority to avoid erratic climate changes in the next decades [322, 323]. Therefore, great efforts were devoted to the development of highly efficient catalysts for the elimination of NOx including N2O [324-326]. CZO has drawn ever increasing attention due to its specific properties. NOx can be reduced or decomposed to N2 by direct decomposition or by chemical reduction using reductants such as NH3, H2, HC, etc.

4.3.1 NH3-SCR

NH3-SCR is regarded as an effective method for the removal of NOx from stationary and mobile sources, and the catalytic efficiency of this technique is significantly affected by the composition of CZO supported catalysts, as show in Table 6.

Table 6
Catalytic activities of nanosize CZO materials in NH3-SCR of NOx.
4.3.1.1 Effect of support composition

Zhang et al. [327] studied the catalytic activity of the 3DOM CZO catalyst doped by metal M (Mn, Fe, Cu and Co) for NH3-SCR of NOx. Those dopants were well incorporated into Ce lattice, except for Cu, and the introduction of those additives to CZO enhanced the active oxygen species, surface reducibility and acidity of the catalysts. Therefore, these doped catalysts displayed better catalytic activity than CZO at low temperature. Among them, the Co-modified catalyst showed the optimum catalytic activity attributed to its highest Oα/(Oα + Oβ) ratio and reducibility, as well as the strongest NH3 adsorption ability. In addition, Fe and Mn dopants effectively broadened the activation temperature window.

The effect of nickel- and sulfate- modified CZO for NH3-SCR of NO in the presence of excess O2 was investigated by Weng et al. [328]. The addition of Ni increased the strength of Lewis acid sites of the catalyst, which was viewed as the essential active sites for low-temperature NH3-SCR reaction. Additionally, the sulfate modification induced the formation of BrØnsted acid sites, which weakened the strong oxidation of NH3 but enhanced the NH3 adsorption capacity of catalyst. Therefore, the catalytic activity of the catalysts at high temperature was improved. Moreover, the introduction of sulfates to NiO/CZO led to high NH3-SCR activity and N2 selectivity. The addition of sulfates not only promoted the mobility of lattice oxygen by the formation of Nin+-O-Sn+ bond in CZO, but also inhibited NH3 oxidation by reducing the amount of surface active oxygen [329].

Shen and Zhu et al. [330] studied the effect of fluorine additive on CeO2-ZrO2-TiO2 (CZT) for NH3-SCR. A series of CZT catalysts with different fluorine additives were synthesized by an impregnation method. The (001) facets were exposed on the catalyst surface with the modulation of HF. The grain size of TiO2 increased and the specific surface area reduced after adding HF. However, the OSC of catalyst could be also enhanced with the modulation of HF. In addition, the synergy of (101) and (001) facets and the increase of surface chemisorbed oxygen and Ce3+ concentrations were beneficial to the improvement of catalytic activity. CZT-10F exhibited excellent catalytic performance for NH3-SCR and more than 96% NO conversion at 360 ℃ under GHSV of 71400 h−1.

Wang and Chen et al. [331, 332] investigated the effect of titanium additive on a W/CZO monolithic catalyst for NH3-SCR of NOx. The doping of TiO2 led to the formation of cerium-zirconium-titanium solid solution with large surface area. The interactions among metal oxides promoted the reductive behavior of the catalyst, which was helpful to enhance the NH3-SCR activity at low temperature. Moreover, the addition of TiO2 to CZO improved the adsorption and activation of NH3 and increased the reactivity of adsorbed nitrate species with NH3 species, and WO3/CZT with 20% TiO2 showed better deNOx activity and sulfur/water vapor tolerance than W/CZO.

Zhang and Huang et al. [333] developed a series of Ce1-xZrxVO4 solid solutions for NH3-SCR of NOx. The introduction of Zr into CeVO4 considerably enhanced the specific surface area, redox property, active oxygen species as well as surface acidity of the catalysts, which were favorable for the improvement of SCR performance. The catalyst Ce0.85Zr0.15VO4 exhibited the best low-temperature NH3-SCR performance. T50 was as low as 125 ℃ for above 80% NO conversion, and almost 100% N2 selectivity was obtained in the range of 150–375 ℃. Furthermore, the catalysts also showed excellent H2O/SO2 durability and good performance at high GHSV of 400000 h−1.

4.3.1.2 Effect of active phase types

Kröcher et al. [334] prepared a 15% WO3/ZrO2-Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 catalyst by the SC method. The catalyst showed more than 90% NOx reduction efficiency between 300 and 500 ℃, and it remained almost unchange over the entire temperature range even after being aged at 700 ℃. In addition, sulfur poisoning promoted the reduction efficiency of NOx at high temperatures at the cost of a decreased low-temperature activity, but the catalyst could be fully recovered by heating in O2 at 650 ℃. Can et al. [335] investigated the catalytic performance of CZO-supported WO3 catalysts for NH3-SCR of NOx. The addition of WO3 on CZO induced a loss of the basic properties, the oxygen mobility, and the oxidation capacity of NO to NO2, but it also led to a significant enhancement of NH3 storage capacity, which seemed to play a significant role in NH3-SCR reaction at high temperatures [336]. The changes in acid-base properties resulted in the enhancement of NH3-SCR performance. All WO3/CZO materials exhibited more than 80% NOx reduction efficiency for NH3-SCR at 350 ℃ in the presence of H2O and CO2 in feed gas. Xu and Chen et al. [337] reported that W/Fe ratio of FeWm/Ce0.68Zr0.32O2 (m = 0–1.38) monolithic catalysts strongly affected the catalytic performance of the catalysts for NH3-SCR of NOx. The FeW1.03/Ce0.68Zr0.32O2 catalyst displayed the best catalytic performance, which exhibited 95% NOx conversion and nearly 100% N2 selectivity ranging from 250 to 435 ℃. This should be due to the more chemically adsorbed oxygen species and Fe3+ active species as well as surface acid sites, which together contributed to the excellent catalytic activity of the FeW1.03/Ce0.68Zr0.32O2 catalyst.

The effect of Mo addition on CZO catalysts for NH3-SCR of NOx was studied by Liu and He et al. [338]. The addition of Mo inhibited the growth of CeO2 particles, improved the redox ability, and increased the amount of surface acidity, especially the Lewis acidity. All of the characteristics were responsible for the excellent NH3-SCR performance. Among these, the CeMo0.5Zr2Ox catalyst showed the best SCR activity, SO2/H2O durability, and thermal stability. Interestingly, Liu and Li et al. [339] further confirmed the professional effect of Mo additive and proposed that the highly dispersed MoO3 not only induced the formation of more BrØnsted acid and Lewis acid sites on the catalyst surface, but also promoted the redox property of the catalyst. They should be accounted for the enhanced SCR activity.

A series of Mn/CZO catalysts with different Mn loading amounts were prepared to investigate the NH3-SCR performance of NO at low temperature. When Mn loading amounts increased, NO conversion on MnOm/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 first increased and then decreased. When Mn/(Ce + Zr) = 0.6, the activity reached the best. The Ea value of MnOm/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 catalyst was 18.1 kJ/mol, which was lower than that of MnOm/TiO2 (38 kJ/mol) [340]. Zhang and Shi et al. [155] combined the experiment and theory to investigate MnOm/CZO nanorods for low-temperature NH3-SCR of NO. MnOm on the surface of nanorods or Mn@CeO2(110) could easily produce a oxygen vacancy distortion. Moreover, the Mn@CeO2(110) model in the DFT analysis showed a prominent effect on NO and NH3 adsorption, which resulted in a stronger nitrite intermediate (NOO*) formation and more attractive interaction with NH3 gas compared with those observed in the CeO2(110) model. A contrastive study on the difference between the introduction of cobalt in the active component and the support of Mn/CZO was made by Shen et al. [341]. Mn/Co-CZO exhibited a higher catalytic activity compared with Mn/CZO and Mn-Co/CZO because of the highly dispersed manganese oxides, good redox properties, more surface acid sites, and surface adsorbed oxygen species as well as more Mn4+ ion. Furthermore, Mn/Co-CZO also exhibited an outstanding SO2 and H2O-resistance.

Brückner et al. [342] investigated NH3-SCR of NO at low temperature over VOm/CexZr1-xO2 (x = 0–1.0) catalysts. 5% VOm/CexZr1-xO2 catalysts with x = 0.7–0.9 seemed to be promising catalysts, which exhibited almost 100% of both NO conversion and N2 selectivity at 220 ℃, and no deactivation took place during at least 190 h under a space velocity of 70000 h−1. Reddy et al. [343] studied the effect of acidic and redox properties of a V2O5/CZO catalyst in NH3-SCR of NO. SCR activity of V2O5/ZrO2 was related to the support crystallinity, acidity, and redox behavior. The V2O5/CZO catalyst exhibited high activity and selectivity for NH3-SCR of NO and was less prone to unselective oxidation of NH3 to N2O. The effect of Nb loading amounts on the active sites and surface acidity of NbOm/CZO for NH3-SCR of NOx was studied by Wu et al. [344]. The catalyst with 15% Nb2O5 showed the best NH3-SCR activity and almost 100% N2 selectivity in the temperature range of 190–460 ℃ at a high space velocity of 300000 h−1. Altering the Nb loading amount would lead to the change in the structure and distribution of surface supported NbOm species and evolution of electronic interaction between Nb species and CZO support. The electron transfer effect from Nbn+ to Cen+ would result in the increase of Ce3+, oxygen vacancies, and active oxygen. Moreover, the total surface acidity of the catalyst was remarkably enhanced after Nb loading, which could promote NH3 adsorption and suppress the NH3 unselective oxidation and be especially beneficial to SCR of NOx at high temperatures (> 300 ℃). Furthermore, the increased cerium sites with adjacent active oxygen contributed to the highly catalytic activity of the NbOm/CZO catalyst at low temperatures. The effect of Nb introduction on the catalytic activity and hydrothermal stability of CZO catalyst for NH3-SCR of NOx was reported by Liu and He et al. [345]. Nb additive to CZO not only increased the specific surface area and enhanced redox property, but also boosted the NH3 adsorption and activation and promoted the reactivity of adsorbed nitrate together with NH3 species. All of the above characteristics were responsible for the excellent NH3-SCR performance. The CeNb3Zr2Ox catalyst exhibited superior SCR activity, high N2 selectivity, and excellent hydrothermal durability, which still possessed high reductivity and abundant acid sites after being aged at 800 ℃.

Si et al. [346] investigated the effect of zirconium phosphate addition to Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 (ZP/CZO) on NH3-SCR of NO. The ZP/CZO catalyst showed superior catalytic activity and good N2 selectivity at 250–450 ℃ under high space velocity of 300000 h−1 owing to the following two main factors. First, the zirconium phosphate provided adsorption sites for NH3 on the catalyst surface, and the cerium sites acted as the redox sites for NO oxidation. The two distinct adsorption sites for NH3 and NOx resulted in a close contact between ads-NH3/NH4+ and ads-NO3/NO2 species on the ZP/CZO catalyst (as illustrated in Fig. 20), which could rapidly react with NO together with active surface lattice oxygen. Second, the pre-combination of zirconium and phosphate could lower the interactions between phosphates and cerium ions. Thereby the mobility of surface lattice oxygen on the Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 catalyst was maintained, which was beneficial to obtaining a catalyst with high NH3-SCR activity at low temperatures. Subsequently, the modification of Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 by phosphate could enhance the hydrothermal stability and sulfur resistance of the catalyst [347].

Fig. 20. Illustration of NH3-SCR reaction route on zirconium phosphate-CZO. Reprinted from [346] with permission.
4.3.1.3 Effect of preparation condition

Effect of calcination temperature on the structure and catalytic performance of the WO3/CZO monolithic catalyst for NH3-SCR of NOx was studied by Wang and Chen et al. [348]. SCR catalytic activity of WO3/CZO was greatly enhanced by modestly rising the calcined temperature. WO3/CZO calcination at 500 ℃ exhibited the lowest light-off temperature of 173 ℃ and total conversion temperature of 205 ℃, while WO3/CZO calcination at 600 ℃ showed a broader temperature range (220–455 ℃) with more than 90% NOx conversion. The calcination temperature at 500 ℃ for WO3/CZO was favorable for stabilizing the structure, increasing the amount of acid sites, Ce3+, and surface active oxygen species, as well as enhancing reductivity of the catalyst. All of these together contributed to its better deNOx activity at low temperatures. Zhang et al. [349] investigated the catalytic properties of CeO2-ZrO2-WO3 (CZW) catalysts synthesized by various methods for NH3-SCR of NOx. The CZW catalyst prepared by a hydrothermal method exhibited the optimal performance in the range of 175–450 ℃ due to the high specific surface area, the good redox behavior, the large amount of Ce3+, and the chemisorbed oxygen species. Moreover, the highly dispersed WO3 species over CZO and the abundant Brønsted acid sites were also responsible for the excellent SCR activity.

4.3.1.4 Mechanisms of NH3-SCR of NOx over nanosize ceria-zirconium-based solid solutions

According to the studies of Gong et al. [350], Cai et al. [351], Brückner et al. [352], and Lee et al. [353], the mechanism of NH3-SCR of NOx over CZO followed two distinct reaction pathways, the L-H mechanism at low temperature (< 200 ℃) and the E-R mechanism at high temperature (> 200 ℃):

(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)

In this SCR reaction, gaseous NH3 molecules were first adsorbed on the BrØnsted acid sites to generate NH4+ ions. Meanwhile, NO molecules were also adsorbed on the catalyst surface and were oxidized to NO2 adspecies. Then one molecule of NO2 reacted with two adjacent NH4+ to generate active complex NO2(NH4+)2. NO2(NH4+)2 finally reacted with one molecule of NO to produce N2 and H2O and thus finished the catalytic cycle.

4.3.2 H2-SCR

Until the full transition to the hydrogen economy and zero emissions of greenhouse gases are realized, H2-SCR might be considered as a breakthrough NOx control technology in favor of the current popular NH3-SCR. In 2014, Efstathiou et al. [354] for the first time reported the catalytic activity of W-promoted CZO (Ce-rich or Zr-rich) solids towards H2-SCR of NOx. In the range of 250–350 ℃ and at GHSV = 51000 h−1, NOx conversions were in the 30%–55% range with 85%–92% N2 selectivity (Fig. 21). A good stability of both Zr-rich and Ce-rich W/CZO catalysts was also obtained at 300 or 250 ℃ even after 66 h on-line reaction. The introduction of about 7 vol% H2O in the feed stream resulted in a 10%–15% drop in NOx conversions in the range of 250%–300 ℃, but an improvement in N2 selectivity by about 5%. Moreover, the specific integral reaction rate of Zr-rich W/CZO towards H2-SCR in the range of 250–350 ℃ was as 2–3 times as that on Ce-rich W/CZO solid. Recently, Li et al. [355] prepared a Pd catalyst with highly dispersed Pd nanoclusters on an Al-doped CZO mixed oxide for low-temperature H2-SCR of NOx with excess O2. The introduction of Al into CZO could effectively reduce the crystallite size and enhance the specific surface as well as increase the surficial Ce3+ concentrations and adsorbed oxygen species. As a result, a remarkable hydrogen spillover ability was achieved. The supported Pd nanoclusters showed 84% NOx conversion in the temperature range of 100–300 ℃.

Fig. 21. (a) NOx conversion (XNOx, %), H2 conversion (XH2, %), (b) N2 selectivity (SN2) and N2O formation (ppm) in H2-SCR as a function of temperature over W-CeZr catalysts. Reaction conditions: 520 ppm NOx (NO:NO2 = 9:1), 1.0% H2, 5% O2, 10% CO2 and He as balance gas, GHSV = 51000 h−1. Reprinted from [354] with permission.

Liotta et al. [356] investigated the effect of the strong metal-support interaction (SMSI) on the catalytic activity of a Pt/Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 catalyst for H2-SCR of NOx. The catalytic activity was enhanced for the catalyst pre-treated in H2 at 350 ℃ compared with the samples performed at 800 and 1050 ℃. Moreover, transient reactivity tests of NO reduction by H2 were also conducted. As expected, the sample pre-reduced at 350 ℃ showed higher activity. The pretreatments had no effect on the N2 selectivity at the temperature of the maximum NOx conversion. Therefore, it demonstrated the presence of SMSI effect between Pt and ceria and the important role of Pt in promoting the CZO structural reorganization. Such type of interaction determined a decrease of Pt and ceria reduction temperature and a stabilization of Pt oxide even in reducing atmosphere at high temperature. Efstathiou et al. [357] reported a series of Pt/CexZr1-xO2 (x = 0.4–0.6) solids to be used for the SCR of NO under lean burn conditions (2.5% O2) using C3H6 and H2 as reducing agents. These Pt/CexZr1-xO2 catalysts showed significant differences for H2-SCR performance in the range of 120–180 ℃ but practically exhibited the same catalytic behavior at higher temperatures. It was proved that the active NOx of H2-SCR path resided within a reactive zone around each Pt nanoparticle, which extended to less than one lattice constant on the support surface. In addition, a remarkable activity and N2 selectivity enhancement was observed at temperature above 400 ℃ when both H2 and C3H6 reducing agents were used compared to H2-SCR or C3H6-SCR alone. This synergy effect was explained to arise mainly because of the increase of θH in the presence of −CHx species derived from adsorbed C3H6 decomposition on Pt, which blocked sites of oxygen chemisorption. The increase of surface oxygen vacancies promoted the formation of a more reactive chelating nitrite (NO2) species compared to the case of H2-SCR.

4.3.3 HC-SCR

Although SCR of NOx by NH3 or urea has proven to be an effective method for reducing NOx emissions, there are several problems inevitably existing in the present NH3-SCR technology, such as NH3 slip, air-heaters fouling storage hazards, ash odor, equipment corrosion, and high running cost. Thus, a very significant market potential exists for an improved technology in this area. As a result, SCR of NO by HC derived from on-board fuel has attracted a lot of attention in the past years [320, 358-361], as displayed in Table 7.

Table 7
Catalytic activity of nanosize CZO materials in HC-SCR of NOx.
4.3.3.1 CH4-SCR

As the main component of natural gas, CH4 is an attractive reductant of NOx for a number of power sources. Nevertheless, the chemical stability of CH4 implies high activation temperature and, usually, a poor selectivity towards the reduction of NO by CH4 is obtained. Therefore, only a limited number of noble metals can act as the active component, such as Pd [355, 362-365]. In 2004, Granger et al. [366] explored CH4 as alternative in SCR of NO in the presence of oxygen over Pd/CZO under lean conditions. The activation procedure under O2 or H2 drastically influenced the catalytic performance of the catalyst. Pd/Ce0.52Zr0.48O2 showed a higher activity and a better N2 selectivity under O2 than that under H2, indicating that oxygen could enhance the activity. Moreover, the stabilization of a metallic or oxidic Pd phase led to poor activity in the conversion of NO in the absence of oxygen. Azambre et al. [367] reported Pd supported on sulfated CZO catalysts for CH4-SCR of NOx and investigated the correlation between catalytic performance and nature of active Pd species. The catalytic activity was mainly dependent on the Pd loading amount. At low Pd loadings, Brönsted acidity of the sulfated support was beneficial to stabilizing Pd to form highly dispersed Pd species, which existed as [(PdO)m-H]n+ adducts located in the vicinity of sulfate species. The corresponding 0.24%–0.53% Pd/sulfated-CZO catalysts exhibited 30%–35% NOx conversion to N2 around 370 ℃. By contrast, higher Pd loading amounts were detrimental for the SCR reaction due to the promoted formation of PdOm clusters, which showed more active in the selective oxidation of CH4. In addition, the introduction of H2O to the feed was unfavorable due to the prevention of NOx and CH4 sorption at low-medium temperatures. The reaction intermediates involved in CH4-SCR and the factors controlling the reactivity of Pd/CZO catalyst were studied by Azambre et al. [368]. By DRIFTS of adsorbed CO, it was found that Pd species on Ce0.2Zr0.8O2 were mainly present in Pdx+ ionic form surrounded by surface oxygens or small PdOm clusters cationic form. The investigation of temperature-programmed surface reaction in CH4 + NO2 atmosphere indicated that CH4-SCR reaction on Pd/Ce0.2Zr0.8O2 was initiated at 280 ℃ and yielded almost 100% N2 above 500 ℃. DRIFTS-MS and TGA experiments showed that deNOx activity was due to a surface reaction between adsorbed COx species, which were generated by CH4 activation on reduced Pd sites with ad-NxOy species presumably located on the support. The detrimental effect of O2 on deNOx was due to the promotion of the complete combustion of CH4 assisted by the ceria-zirconia component at the expense of SCR reaction above 320 ℃.

4.3.3.2 C3H6-SCR

Compared to H2, CH4, much more efforts have been made to improve NO removal using C3H6 as reductant. Thomas et al. [369] investigated C3H6-SCR of NOx on Pd/Ce0.68Zr0.32O2 catalysts (Pd/CZO). The addition of Pd to CZO significantly promoted the reduction of NO by C3H6, and the catalyst still exhibited relative high deNOx activity even in the presence of 1.7% H2O. Pd/CZO displayed much higher N2 selectivity than Pd0/SiO2, indicating that the lean deNOx mechanism occurring on these catalysts should be different from that of Pd0/SiO2.

Haneda et al. [370] studied the catalytic performance of Rh supported on CZO for C3H6-SCR of NO. The catalytic activity of Rh/CZO strongly depended on the Ce/Zr ratio. Rh/Ce0.50Zr0.50O2 showed the best activity. Moreover, the activity of Rh/CZO for C3H6-SCR of NO also depended on the reaction gas conditions. The presence of O2 could inhibit NO reduction by C3H6, especially for Rh/Ce0.74Z0.26O2. The effect of the nature of platinum group metals (PGMs: Pd, Rh, Pt) on the lean C3H6-assisted removal of NO on Ce0.68Zr0.32O2-supported catalysts was investigated by Thomas et al. [371]. The order of reactivity of CZO-supported PGMs was Pd ≥ Pt ≥ Rh, and CZO-supported catalysts exhibited higher N2 selectivity than those supported on SiO2 or Al2O3. The higher catalytic activity of Pd-based catalysts for C3H6-SCR of NOx might be associated with the greater ability of the PdOx phase to adsorb NO2.

Amin et al. [372] studied the catalytic activity of CZO-supported Cu and Ag for C3H6-SCR of NO. Compared to Cu(4)/Ag(1)/CeO2, Cu(4)/Ag(1)/Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 displayed higher deNOx activity in the range of 250–350 ℃. The SMSI and high redox property of the support exhibited by the Cu(4)/Ag(1)/Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 catalyst were considered to be the main reasons of the improvement of C3H6-SCR performance. In addition, reaction temperature was found to affect NO reduction activity more significantly than NO and C3H6 concentrations. The optimum conditions were estimated to be 415.4 ℃, 1827.2 ppm of NO, and 1908.1 ppm of C3H6 concentration corresponding to NO conversion of 82.9%.

4.3.3.3 Other CxHy-SCR

Compared with CH4-SCR and C3H6-SCR, more research has been performed on SCR of NOx with a mixture of HC representative of the exhaust gas from fossil fuel combustion (C3H8, C3H6, and C7H8) over CZO catalysts. Costa et al. [373] studied the relationship between the surface properties and deNOx activity of CZO. CexZr1-xO2 (x = 0.17–0.8) were active in deNOx reaction, and their catalytic activities varied with the different cerium amounts and reached the maximum for x = 0.62 with 27% NOx transformation to N2 at 322 ℃. Subsequently, Costa et al. [374] investigated CZO-supported rhodium catalyst for NOx reduction, and the catalytic activities were evaluated by isothermal steady-state experiments using a mixture of exhaust gases of HC. The addition of Rh on Ce0.62Zr0.38O2 considerably improved the catalytic activity during the deNOx process assisted by HC, and decreased by about 34 ℃ for the temperature of NOx conversion to N2, which went up to 57%. The effect of support on the three-way catalytic HC-NO-O2 reaction over Pt/CZO catalysts under reducing conditions was investigated by means of operando X-ray absorption near edge structure [375]. The formation of active metallic Pt sites and the self-poisoning effect of adsorbed carbonaceous species on metallic Pt should determine the start-up behavior of catalytic reaction over supported Pt catalysts. The oxygen reactivity in the support oxide was also important for reducing the catalytic start-up temperature in addition to the suitable Pt reduction temperature.

4.3.3.4 Mechanisms of HC-SCR of NOx over nanosize ceria-zirconium-based solid solutions

The reduction mechanism of NOx by HC over CZO is very complex [376-381]. According to the mechanism proposed by Djéga-Mariadassou et al. [379] (as shown in Fig. 22), the first step of this catalyst is to oxidize NO to NO2. The second step is the mild oxidation of HC by NO2 to form oxygenate species, which plays an important role in the catalyst regeneration process. The release of N2 occurs in step 3. It involved NOx dissociation and followed by the formation of N2 and scavenging of the adsorbed oxygen species left from NO dissociation. The removal of the adsorbed oxygen was due to the total oxidation of an activated reductant (CxHyOz). In addition, both steps 2 and 3 have to turn over simultaneously. However, at the molecular level, the both steps were not in the same catalytic cycle.

Fig. 22. Catalys-assisted de NOx reaction: each cycle corresponds to one function (F1, F2, and F3).
4.3.4 CxH2x+1OH-SCR

For deNOx reaction, it has been reported that when a hydrocarbon is able to catalytically reduce NOx, its corresponding alcohol must also be useful for such a process [382]. The role of CH3OH in the reduction of NOx to N2 was investigated over H3PW12O40-Pt/CZO [383]. The reduction of NOx went through two stages. First, during the lean mode for 2 min, NOx (NO/NO2 = 1) were stored in the catalyst; second, they were reduced into N2 during the rich period (CH3OH injection 1 min). With CH3OH, NOx storage efficiency of H3PW12O40-Pt/CZO was stable and high (ca. 100%), and about 55% of stored NOx were reduced into N2 by alternative lean/rich cycles. CxHyOz intermediate species derived from methanol were thought to be the intermediate reductants for NOx.

Azambre et al. [384] studied the catalytic performance of sulfated CZO catalysts for SCR of NOx by ethanol. The sulfated CZO catalysts were prepared by direct sulfation of the crystallized CZO nanopowders with 0.5 mol/L H2SO4. The sulfation treatment enhanced the SCR activity via the promotion of alternative pathways for the formation of N2 and the prevention of combustion reactions at medium temperatures. Moreover, NOx conversion was shown to exceed 30% on most of SCR catalysts in the range of 250–400 ℃. Above 350–400 ℃, the N2 selectivity was close to 100% and an optimum deNOx yield of 48% was achieved for a sulfated catalyst with a Ce molar fraction of 0.5. Azambre and his coworkers [385] further studied the effect of Ag, Pd and Co additive on the SCR of NOx by ethanol over sulfated CZO catalysts. The metal promoters have a discrete effect on C2H5OH-SCR activity, often negative and sometimes positive. Positive effects essentially arised from the formation of acetaldehyde, which was the most effective reductant of the system. It occurred mostly in the presence of Ag species in the +1 oxidation state. By contrast, the Pd catalyst was not effective for C2H5OH-SCR because it induced a depletion of the organics needed for NOx reduction by promoting total oxidation reactions. Another negative effect was the inhibition of the most active cerium sites of the support, which led to a decrease of the SCR activity at low temperatures and the shift of deNOx window towards the high temperatures.

Djéga-Mariadassou et al. [386] investigated the catalytic performance of 1-propanol-assisted reduction of NOx over a Ir/Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 catalyst. This catalytic material showed a promotional effect of iridium on the conversion of NOx. Ir/Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 exhibited a higher NOx reduction (25% at 225 ℃) than Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 (19% at 260 ℃). 1-Propanol was activated at lower temperatures over the Ir catalyst. Moreover, R-NOx species were found to be the intermediates of the deNOx process, which provided the partially oxidized species required by the deNOx model.

4.4 Nanosize ceria-zirconium-based solid solutions for NOx direct decomposition
4.4.1 NO direct decomposition

Although several methods exist to eliminate NO, direct decomposition of NO to N2 and O2 (NO → 1/2N2 + 1/2O2) is recognized to be one of the most attractive methods because it does not need any reductants and is simple and economical. NO is thermodynamically unstable. However, it does not decompose easily due to its high Ea value (364 kJ/mol). Therefore, a proper catalyst is needed to lower Ea value in order to facilitate the decomposition. Research in this domain has been extensively performed on noble metal-supported catalysts [387, 388], metal oxides [389-394], carbon [395-397], and zeolite-based catalysts [398-404]. Whereas, little research was reported on the direct decomposition of NOx over CZO-based catalysts. Cheng et al. [405] prepared nanosize CZO-supported H3PW12O40 (HPW) for NO capture and decomposition. CZO exhibited remarkable promotion effect on the capture of NOx. For HPW/CZO prepared by a mechanical grinding method, NOx adsorption efficiency was considerably enhanced with increasing HPW loading amounts in the range of 20%–70%. However, the deNOx efficiency decreased with increasing loading of HPW (> 70%). Subsequent to the adsorption process, the adsorbed NOx decomposed to N2 upon heating from 150 to 450 ℃, with a N2 yield of 27.3%. Yang et al. [406] reported a Ce-Cu-Zr/ZSM-5 catalyst prepared by an ion-exchange method showing high catalytic activity for NO decomposition in the presence of O2, and the highest NO conversion was up to 75%. This indicated that the introduction of CZO could promote the formation of a new highly active site, which facilitated oxygen mobilization and desorption, thereby enhanced the activity of catalysts.

4.4.2 N2O direct decomposition

Besides NO, nitrous oxide (N2O) has drawn ever increasing attention in the past decades because of its detrimental green house effect and ozone-depleting action [322, 407-410]. Thus, the development of highly active catalysts to purify N2O is becoming an important issue. Imamura et al. [411] investigated the effects of structural composition and calcination temperature of the catalysts on the catalytic performance of Rh/CZO for N2O decomposition. The incorporation of Zr into ceria significantly enhanced its thermal stability to retain high specific surface area even at the calcination temperature of 900 ℃. Rh/Ce0.7Zr0.3O2 exhibited the optimal catalytic activity due to the highly dispersed Rh species exposed to the support surface. Nevertheless, too high calcination temperature (1200 ℃) led to the remarkable decrease of catalyst surface area and the aggregation of Rh.

So far, NOx direct decomposition over metal surfaces, oxides, or zeolites is faced to some serious practical difficulties. NOx decomposition process is a high-temperature reaction, which is undesirable. NOx dissociation over single crystal metal easily reoxidizes the metal surface, which in turn hinders the NOx dissociation process. So, a reducing agent is needed to scavenge the dissociated oxygen. From an exhaust catalysis view, it is not sufficient to dissociate NOx, and other pollutants like CO and HC should also be oxidized. Therefore, NOx reduction by H2, HC, and NH3 is more attractive for NOx abatement.

4.4.3 Mechanisms of NOx direct decomposition over nanosize ceria-zirconium-based solid solutions

It is widely accepted that N2O decomposition is a sensitive reaction to oxygen mobility.

(33)
(34)
(35)

In this mechanism, the asterisk (*) is a coordinatively unsaturated site of oxidic transition for N2O adsorption. The first step for N2O decomposition was the adsorption of N2O followed by its decomposition, leading to N2 formation in association with surface oxygen. In this classical model, oxygen formation occurred through recombination of two adsorbed atomic oxygen species (O*) or through reaction of N2O with adsorbed atomic oxygen species.

4.5 Nanosize cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions for simultaneous removal of CO and NOx

The simultaneous removal of CO and NOx in the presence or absence of O2, CO2, and H2O is a proper model reaction, which is different from real automobile exhaust emission. However, the fundamental studies using the supported noble and non-noble metal catalysts were performed to get more insight into the nature of this reaction [412-416], as shown in Table 8.

Table 8
Catalytic Activity of nanosize CZO materials in simultaneous removal of CO and NOx.
4.5.1 Pt-based ceria-zirconium catalysts

Rao et al. [417] reported CZO-supported Rh catalysts for NO + CO reaction. The activation of the reductant was difficult on the bare support, and the presence of Rh was necessary to activate and spill it over to the support. Moreover, the bulk oxygen vacancy played an important role in promoting NO conversion over Rh/CZO catalysts, and oxygen vacancy gradient was indicated as the main driving force for NO dissociation. Ihm et al. [418] investigated the catalytic activities of Pt/WO3/CZO catalysts for NO + CO reaction with or without oxygen. Pt/CeO2 and Pt/CZO could be readily reduced by CO, while the reduction was significantly inhibited with the introduction of WO3 for Pt/WO3/CZO. It was due to that WO3 addition suppressed the formation of the active sites for NO reduction. Pt/WO3/ZrO2 showed a slightly higher activity than Pt/ZrO2. As reported by Regalbuto and Wolf [419], Pt-WO3 adlineation sites exhibited very high NO dissociation activity and increased the activity toward NO + CO reaction. However, based on the results displayed in Fig. 23, there was no obvious correlation between acidity and catalytic activity for NO + CO reaction over Pt/WO3/CeO2/ZrO2 catalysts in the absence of oxygen. With excess oxygen, Pt/WO3/CZO and Pt/WO3/ZrO2 catalysts showed higher NO conversion to N2 and N2O particularly at low temperature. This was attributed to the enhanced acidity from ZrO2 and WO3 in the Pt/WO3/CeO2/ZrO2 catalysts in the presence of excess oxygen.

Fig. 23. Catalytic activities for the removal of NO + CO over various catalysts (CO: 0.5%, NO: 0.5%). Reprinted from [419] with permission.
4.5.2 Pd-based ceria-zirconium catalysts

Wang et al. [420] prepared a series of mesoporous Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 solid solutions with cationic defects by a surfactant-controlled synthesis method, and the pore size of Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 could be governed by the incorporation of the surfactant into solid network and the calcination temperature. In the cold start of reaction, NO reduction by CO with excess oxygen over the 3% Pd/Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 catalyst presented 100% selectivity to N2. At reaction temperatures below 200 ℃, NO restrained the oxidation of CO. However, above 200 ℃, CO oxidation showed an inhibition effect on NO conversion, and there was a reaction competition between NO reduction by CO and CO oxidation by O2. The key factor of the reaction competition was the concentration of CO and O2. The different oxygen concentration also influenced Pd state. High coverage of Pd surface by oxygen was favorable for NO oxidation to NO2 but suppressed NO decomposition to N* and O*. Fernández-García et al. [421] investigated the light-off behavior for CO + NO reaction over Pd/CZO/Al2O3 catalysts prepared by the ME method. The promoting effect of CZO was present in both CO oxidation and NO reduction reactions, and it was dependent on the characteristics of the promoter and the nature of the reaction. CO oxidation activity was greatly enhanced by contact between Pd and the 3-D aggregated promoter, and the catalytic activity increased with increasing CZO content. Fernández-Garcıa and co-workers [422] further studied the catalytic activity of a series of Pd-Cr bimetallic catalysts supported on a CZO/Al2O3 mixed support for CO + NO + O2 reaction. The catalytic activities of these bimetallic catalysts were strongly influenced by the nature of the support. For the Al2O3 support, an interaction between Pd and Cr existed in the calcination state, and the mixed oxide phase containing Pd+ and Cr3+ appeared to be the main factor leading to the enhancement in CO oxidation and the decrease in NO reduction compared with the monometallic system. In the case of the CZO/Al2O3 mixed support, the introduction of Cr was less influential for catalytic activity. The effect of Ni on the catalytic activity of Pd-Ni/CZO/Al2O3 catalysts for stoichiometric CO and NO elimination was investigated by Martínez-Arias et al. [423]. A significant dependence on the support nature in terms of catalytic changes was produced by Ni. The introduction of Ni considerably promoted the CO oxidation activity over the CZO/Al2O3-supported catalyst. This was due to the changes of Pd distribution over the support, which favored the formation of active Pd-CZO interfaces. The significant extent of such a promoting effect revealed an important role of the particle size of CZO component on such catalytic processes.

4.5.3 Rh-based ceria-zirconium catalysts

Compared with Pt- and Pd-based CZO catalysts, Rh-based CZO catalysts get relatively less attention. In 2009, Ihm et al. [424] prepared CZO by supercritical synthesis and CP methods as support for a Rh catalyst. The catalytic activities of the catalysts were investigated for NO + CO reaction. Rh/CZO prepared by a supercritical synthesis method exhibited better reducibility and higher thermal stability as well as better performance for the catalytic reduction of NO by CO than that prepared by a CP method. CZO prepared by the supercritical synthesis method showed more potential applications as catalyst support due to its sparsely-agglomerated morphology and higher thermal stability.

4.5.4 Cu-based ceria-zirconium catalysts

In addition to CZO-supported noble metals (Pt, Pd, Rh) catalysts, considerable efforts have been devoted to developing promising Cu-based catalysts for NO + CO reaction. Zhang et al. [425] investigated the catalytic activity of 4% Cu/CexZr1-xO2 (x = 0–1.0) catalysts for the reduction of NO by CO. The incorporation of Zr4+ into CeO2 could stabilize Cu+ species, which was favorable for the initial reductive chemisorption of NO to N2O. Cu/Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 showed an excellent low temperature activity with 40% N2 yield at 150 ℃ due to its abundant surface reactive oxygen sites and high reducibility, and N2 yield > 85% was obtained for all Zr-containing catalysts at 250 ℃ and above. Gao et al. [426] studied the effects of Ce/Zr molar ratios on the physicochemical properties of CuO/CexZr1-xO2/γ-Al2O3 catalysts for NO + CO reaction. The ceria-rich catalyst showed higher activity and TOF value towards NO reduction compared with the pure ceria and zirconia-rich ones due to the difference in the interaction among Cu, CexZr1-xO2, and γ-Al2O3 support. Dong et al. [427] prepared a series of CuO/CexZr1-xO2 catalysts with different Cu loading amounts and Ce/Zr molar ratios and studied the correlation of structural characteristics with catalytic performance for NO reduction by CO. The ceria-rich (pseudocubic t") phase could disperse and stabilize the copper species more effectively and resulted in stronger interaction with copper than the zirconia-rich (t) phase. Furthermore, compared with the zirconia-rich phase, the synergistic interaction of Cu with ceria-rich phase easily promoted the reduction of copper species and surface oxygen as well as the activation of adsorbed NO species. Therefore, the CuO/Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 catalyst exhibited the higher activity for NO reduction than CuO/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 and the CuO/Ce0.2Zr0.8O2 catalysts.

Compared with CZO-supported mono-metal catalysts, binary metal oxides possess more active species, which may be more favorable for the catalytic reaction of NO + CO. Dong and co-workers [428] investigated the activity of binary metal oxides Ce0.67Zr0.33O2 supported CuO-CoOm catalysts for the removal of NO and CO. The addition of cobalt species significantly improved the activity of NO + CO by promoting the reduction of dispersed copper oxide. FT-IR results further revealed that the addition of cobalt oxide changed the adsorption type of NO and CO on the catalysts, and oxidized NO dimers into ionic NO3, and then these partial surface active species might be reduced into low-valence state above 300 ℃. Subsequently, they investigated the effect of MnOm modification on the activity of the CuO/Ce0.67Zr0.33O2 catalyst for NO reduction by CO [429]. The introduction of Cu and Mn species induced the expansion of lattice and the decrease of microstrain of CZO, thereby promoting the formation of oxygen vacancies. The addition of Mn species could promote the reduction of the catalysts and assist copper oxide in changing the valence and supplying oxygen. These reduction behavior was dependent on the loading amounts of MnOm and the impregnation procedure. In addition, the introduction of MnOm could not change the adsorption type of NO, but readily facilitated the activation of the adsorbed NO species. As a result, these factors were responsible for the enhancement of activity and selectivity through MnOm modification.

4.5.5 Mechanisms of simultaneous removal CO and NO reaction over nanosize ceria-zirconium-based solid solutions

There are two mechanisms related to simultaneous removal CO and NO, the redox mechanism and the organonitrogen mechanism. The redox mechanism involves an initial dissociation-chemisorption of NO, which forms a N2O intermediate and an oxidized surface, and then CO further reduces N2O into N2 and restores the original catalytic surface [237, 430]. By contrast, the organonitrogen mechanism includes the generation of isocyanate compounds as an intermediate [431, 432]. In the catalytic reduction of NOx, the two reaction mechanisms may occur simultaneously, and the contribution of each mechanism may depend on the reductant type, catalyst nature, and reaction conditions (temperature, space velocity, concentration, etc.) [433, 434]. Zhang and Kaliaguine et al. [430] proposed that CO + NO reaction mechanism on Cu/CZO involved the dissociation and reduction of chemisorbed NOx.

At the 50–250 ℃ low-temperature region:

(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)

At the high-temperature range above 250 ℃:

(44)
(45)
(46)

Oxidation of intermediate carbonaceous species:

(47)
(48)

Sun and Dong et al. [428] reported a possible reaction mechanism over CuCo/CZO catalysts for NO + CO reaction:

(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)

NO was assumed to preferentially adsorb over dispersed copper oxide or oxygen vacancy sites of CZO to form chelating nitrite and cis-N2O22− below 300 ℃ (Eqs. (49) and (50)). These adsorbed NOx species reacted with CO activated by Cu+ species, and then N2O and CO2 were produced. When the temperature was over 300 ℃, the catalyst could be reduced by CO to Cu+ and Co2+ ions. The catalytic reduction of NO to N2 was generated by CO. The main Cu+ species contributed to N2O reduction by CO, while the dispersed cobalt oxides played an important role in N2O decomposition and reduction by CO, as shown in Eqs. (51) and (52).

4.6 Nanosize cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions for simultaneous removal of NOx and soot

The simultaneous removal of NOx and soot using one catalytic material was proposed for the first time by Yoshida et al. [435], which seems to be one of the most effective and economic after-treatment techniques. The key challenge is to find a catalyst that can achieve a high rate of soot oxidation in combination with substantial NOx reduction at sufficiently low temperature. Several kinds of catalysts such as precious metals [436-439], transition metal oxides [440], alkaline metal oxides [441], perovskite-like type oxides [442-446], and ceria-based oxides [285, 447, 448] have shown good catalytic activities for simultaneous removal of NOx and soot. Especially, CZO is one of the key components owing to its excellent OSC property and robust stability [156, 214].

4.6.1 Effect of preparation conditions

The key features of CZO that exhibited the catalytic performance of the simultaneous removal of NOx and soot were investigated by Bueno-Lopez et al. [449]. The catalytic activity of the catalyst for soot combustion was dependent on both specific surface area and Ce/Zr molar ratio, which closely depended on the preparation procedures, but NOx conversion was very low. The surface distribution of cations was associated with the homogeneity of CZO according to the different synthesis procedure. The specific surface area of CZO was usually lower than 90 m2/g. Nevertheless, constant T50 could be obtained for the catalysts with specific surface areas above this value, i.e., there was a minimum temperature that could be lowered by increasing the surface area of the catalyst (Fig. 24).

Fig. 24. T50 versus BET surface area of the catalysts for the removal of NOx and soot. Reprinted from [449] with permission.

The effect of the cerium precursor salt on the catalytic activity of CZO for the removal of NOx and soot was reported by García-García et al. [450]. CZO prepared with (NH4)2Ce(NO3)6 showed higher catalytic activity than the counterpart catalysts prepared with a Ce(NO3)3·6H2O precursor, and ceria-rich catalysts with ceria-rich exhibited better catalytic performance than the corresponding zirconia-rich ones.

4.6.2 Effect of rare earth doping

The property of CZO can be adjusted by dopants, and thus their catalytic activity for the elimination of NOx and soot is enhanced. Dulgheru et al. [451] studied the effects of rare earth (La, Nd, Pr)-modified CZO for catalytic removal of NOx and soot. The rare earth dopants increased the activity of CZO. Especially, the doping of La and Pr significantly enhanced the low-temperature activity due to the increased formation of NO2. Whereas, the effect was less pronounced for a Nd-doped sample. Bueno-López et al. [452] investigated the effect of Nd doping on the physicochemical properties and catalytic activity for the elimination of NOx and soot over CZO. Four oxides including CeO2, Ce0.9Nd0.1O2, Ce0.73Zr0.27O2, and Ce0.64Zr0.27Nd0.09O2 were prepared by a CP method. Ce0.64Zr0.27Nd0.09O2 showed the best catalytic activity due to the improved thermal stability and redox properties. Moreover, it was confirmed that the higher activity of Ce0.64Zr0.27Nd0.09O2 was closely related to the formation of less stable surface nitrates and nitrites species. Thus, it provided alternative and faster NO2 production pathways.

4.6.3 Effect of transitional metal doping

It is generally accepted that reaction pathways for the combustion of soot over CZO-supported active metal catalysts can be divided into two sections according to different temperatures. At low temperatures, soot is directly oxidized by active oxygen species that are migrated from the surface of CZO-supported catalysts. At high temperatures, both NO2 and active oxygen species promote soot oxidation, and especially NO2 as an intermediate reactant plays a dominant role. In this process, NO2 serving as the oxidizer is reduced, and soot acting as the reducer is oxidized. Thus, the simultaneous removal of soot and NOx is realized. However, it is noted that only a part of NO can be oxidized to NO2 by the catalyst owing to the thermal equilibrium compositions. Therefore, most of NO is not reduced and directly emitted to atmosphere, which can result in great harmful to human health. Thus, an additional reductant needs to be added into this reaction process. Based on this consideration, Cheng et al. [181, 182, 184] prepared a Fe-doped 3DOM CZO material that could simultaneously remove soot and NOx from diesel engine exhausts. Ammonia was used as a reductant for NOx removal. 3DOM Ce-Zr-based mixed oxides were synthesized by a carbon-template method and varied Fe content in the mixed oxide. Those materials showed high efficiency in simultaneous removal of NOx and soot in intermediate temperatures (285–420 ℃ with 100% NOx conversion), which essentially meets the demand of diesel engine exhaust emissions. Moreover, the addition of Fe to Ce-Zr lowered the temperature of soot combustion to a level that was typically achieved by more expensive Pt catalysts (Fig. 25). The importance of the open 3DOM texture in soot capture and combustion was demonstrated by comparison to a mesopore or particle mixed oxide of the same composition. Furthermore, DFT calculation was used to understand the surface reducibility of the mixed oxides and gain insight into the role of Fe and surface oxygen vacancies in the reaction mechanism of NOx reduction and soot oxidation. It showed that substitution of Fe in CZO increased the number of oxygen vacancies (Fig. 26), thereby enhancing the catalytic performance of simultaneous removal of NOx and soot. Ce/Zr ratios affected the catalytic activity [181]. A 3DOM Ce0.85Fe0.1Zr0.05O2 sample exhibited the optimal catalytic activity with a maximum concentration of CO2 at 415 ℃ and nearly a 100% NO conversion in the range of 365–503 ℃. In addition, 3DOM Ce0.8M0.1Zr0.1O2 (M = Mn, Co, Ni) catalysts were also prepared, and the 3DOM Ce0.8Mn0.1Zr0.1O2 catalyst displayed the maximum concentration of CO2 at 402 ℃ for soot combustion and excellent NH3-SCR performance at 374–512 ℃ [183]. The specific 3DOM architecture, high Ce3+/Ce4+ ratio and amount of chemisorbed oxygen species, good low-temperature reductive property, and the abundant of acid sites should be responsible for the excellent catalytic efficiency of Ce0.8M0.1Zr0.1O2 (M = Fe, Mn, Co, Ni) for the simultaneous elimination of NOx and soot.

Fig. 25. CO2 concentration (left) and NO conversion (right) as a function of temperature upon exposure of 3DOM Ce0.9-xFexZr0.1O2 catalysts loosely mixed with model soot. Reaction conditions: 1000 ppm of NH3, 1000 ppm of NO, 3% O2 and balance N2, GHSV = 25000 h−1. Reprinted from [182] with permission.
Fig. 26. (a) Structure of Fe-doped CeO2(111) as the stoichiometric surface and with one and two oxygen vacancies; (b) Adsorption of NH3 and NO on Fe-doped CeO2(111) with one oxygen vacancy (Fe1Ce1−xO2−y(111)); Fe-doped CeO2(111) with the oxygen vacancy preadsorbed by O2 (O2*Fe1Ce1−xO2−y(111)). Color scheme: white, Ce4+; green, Ce3+; red, O; orange, O to be removed; purple, Fe; blue, N; bright white, H. Reprinted from [182] with permission.
4.7 Three-way catalytic removal for the exhausts from gasoline engines

Nowadays, three-way catalysts consisted of noble metals (Pt, Rh, Pd), sub-catalysts (CeO2, CeO2-ZrO2, etc.), and monolithic ceramic supports (alumina, 2MgO·2Al2O3·5SiO2, etc.) comprise the state-of-the-art gas after-treatment technology, which are installed in gasoline-powered vehicle emission control systems for simultaneous conversion of CO, NOx and unburnt HC [453]. Improving performance of catalysts for vehicle exhaust is the key issue to meet the increasing standard of emission regulations. Many research groups have pioneeringly and deeply studied the properties of CZO and its important role in three-way catalysis [454-459]. It has been found that the preparation process [460-462] and material composition [463-466] can significantly influence the concentration of active Ce4+ species and structural properties in the solid solution, as shown in Table 9.

Table 9
Catalytic activities of nanosize CZO materials in three-way catalytic removal.
4.7.1 Effect of preparation conditions

Zhou et al. [467] investigated the effect of synthesis conditions (pH values of the solution of metal precursors and aging temperature) on properties of Ce0.67Zr0.33O2 prepared by a CP method and its application in Pd-based TWCs. The crystallite size of CZO increased significantly with increasing aging temperature during precipitation, while OSC dropped and no notable effect on porosity of CZO was observed. Moreover, the structural properties of CZO were affected by the pH value during precipitation. Pd-based TWCs supported on this CZO support showed the best catalytic activity. Chen et al. [468] investigated the effect of synthesis methods (CP, mechanical mixing, and modified CP method) on the structural properties and catalytic performance of Pd/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2-Al2O3 TWCs. The different preparation methods gave rise to the different interactions between CZO and Al2O3, thereby leading to various atom rearrangements during the aging process. The catalyst prepared by the modified CP method maintained superior textural and structural properties as well as reductive behavior after being aged, which exhibited high catalytic performance with 10% conversion temperatures of C3H8, CO, and NO of 327, 164, and 208 ℃, respectively. These were obviously lower than that of the catalysts synthesized by the conventional CP method and mechanical mixing route. Hu et al. [7] synthesized nanosize CZY using a hydrothermal method. TWCs-containing CZY displayed a higher catalytic activity. Zhang et al. [469] prepared Ce1-xZrxO2 (x = 0–0.8) nanoparticle powders by a mild urea hydrolysis hydrothermal method. Ce1-xZrxO2 (x = 0.4–0.6) powders preferred a metastable t" phase to t' phase due to small crystallite size effect. The stabilization of pseudocubic t" structure led to the high strain level in Ce1-xZrxO2 (x = 0.4–0.6) crystal lattice. Moreover, a linear relationship between the lattice strain and OSC value of the CeO2-ZrO2 catalyst was observed, and this correlation could be used as a tool to evaluate its OSC and help to fabricate new CeO2-ZrO2 catalysts with higher OSC and better redox performance. Zhou and co-workers [470] reported the effect of mechanical mixing and CP methods on the redox behavior and catalytic performance of the three-way CZA catalysts. CZA prepared by the CP method exhibited better thermal stability than that prepared by mechanical mixing due to the presence of stronger interaction between CZO and Al2O3, which was helpful for maintaining large surface area and small particle size and inhibiting the formation of α-alumina phase under the high-temperature condition. Moreover, it could also improve the thermal stability of Pd/CZA catalysts. They further studied the preparation methods (CP, homogeneous precipitation, ME and hydrothermal method) on the catalytic performance of Ce0.67Zr0.33O2-supported Pd TWCs [471]. The preparation methods significantly influenced the physicochemical properties of Ce0.67Zr0.33O2 mixed oxides. The catalyst prepared by the CP method amplified the stoichiometric window for the fresh and aged catalyst due to suitable pore distribution, better OSC value, good redox property, and textural stability.

4.7.2 Effect of pretreatment conditions

Liotta et al. [472] investigated the effect of redox pretreatment on the structural composition of CZO for three-way catalysis. The changes of structure resulted from different calcination treatments were brought back by the redox cycles. The reductive behavior of CZO was not changed by repeated cycles, and the loss of surface area did not affect the total OSC. In addition, the alternative reductive and oxidative treatments led to reversible change of the solid solution composition around the nominal value of Ce0.6Zr0.4O2. Zhou et al. [473] found that the catalytic activities of Pd/CZO-Al2O3 catalysts were affected by thermal treatment. The surface oxygen desorption capacity and lattice oxygen mobility decreased due to the sintering of supports after being calcined at high temperature, which was unfavorable for the dispersion of active species, leading to the loss of three-way catalytic activities. Anderson et al. [474] invesigated the effect of oxychlorination treatments on the redox and oxygen storage and release properties of Pd-Rh/CZO/Al2O3 model TWCs. Thermal aging could not only lead to the decrease of metal dispersion, but also result in a loss of OSC as oxygen storage component. A series of complex feed-streams were performed on Ce0.68Zr0.32O2 mixed oxide to investigate its performance as TWCs by González-Velasco et al. [475]. The pre-reducing treatment could greatly enhance both low-temperature NO reduction activity and N2 selectivity. Although a remarkable decrease in the specific surface area of the mixed oxide took place after being aged at 900 ℃, the catalytic activity of the aged sample remained similar or even better than the fresh one due to the increased OSC value. Therefore, CO and HC emissions during cold-start state could be reduced by placing the catalytic converter nearer the outlet to the engine exhaust, where the CZO-based catalyst would be heated faster.

4.7.3 Effect of alkali or alkali-earth metals doping

Ba and Sr are reported to be two excellent promoters for Al2O3, which can effectively suppress the decrease of specific specific surface area and inhibit the transformation of the Al2O3 phase at high temperature in the three-way catalytic reaction [476-479]. Zhou's group [480] reported the effect of BaO doping on the structure and catalytic performance of Pd/CexZr1-xO2 (x = 0.2–0.8) catalysts for automobile emission control. BaO addition significantly promoted the catalytic activity of HC and NOx conversions due to promoting the formation of oxygen vacancy and improving active oxygen mobility resulting from electronic and structural modifications. After thermal aging treatment, Zr-rich catalysts (CeO2/ZrO2 < 1) underwent less severe deterioration of the catalytic activity compared with Ce-rich catalysts (CeO2/ZrO2 ≥ 1) due to better thermal stability, and Pd/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2BaO presented the optimally catalytic performance. Subsequently, they probed the role of Ba in TWCs Pd/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 using in-situ DRIFTS [481]. The introduction of Ba weakened the strong adsorption of HC reactants on the catalyst surface and accelerated NO dissociation. It facilitated the formation of intermediates (CN and NCO) due to the excellent electron-donating ability of Ba. Thereby Ba-modified catalysts exhibited much higher catalytic activity for HC and NOx conversions than the unmodified one. However, the introduction of Ba led to the loss of active sites, thus it inhibited CO oxidation at low temperatures. Wang et al. [482] investigated the effect of different amounts of Sr doping on the catalytic performance of Pd/Ce0.67Zr0.33O2 catalysts for automobile emission control. Sr doping enhanced the low-temperature activity and the thermal stability of the Pd phase owing to the improved oxygen mobility and OSC. Pd-based TWCs supported on Ce0.67Zr0.33Sr0.03O2.03 support exhibited the optimal activity for C3H8 and NO conversion as well as broadened activation temperature window. Shi et al. [483] conducted a comparative study of the catalytic performance over SrO and BaO doping CeO2-ZrO2 for TWCs. Ce0.35Zr0.55Sr0.10O1.9 (CZS) and Ce0.35Zr0.55Ba0.10O1.9 (CZB) were prepared by an oxidation-CP method with H2O2 as oxidizing agent, and then they were used for preparing TWCs with a low loading amount of Pt and Rh. The incorporation of Sr2+ ions into CZO could retain a higher OSC value than the introduction of Ba2+ ions. Moreover, the introduction of Sr2+ ions favored the formation of homogeneously face-centered cubic phases and maintained the stability of lattice cell units. Therefore, the catalyst modified by Sr2+ exhibited a better catalytic activity and wider activation temperature window.

4.7.4 Effect of rare earth doping

With ever increasingly rigorous emission regulations are being implemented, taking into account that a significant portion of toxic emissions is produced during cold start, it is necessary to place TWCs closer to the engine in order to attain their light-off activity immediately after the start up of the engine. Consequently, the catalysts should be capable of tolerating high temperature. Therefore, better thermal stability and higher OSC are urgent for the development of new-generation TWCs. A great amount of research has demonstrated that the doping rare earth metal can improve the three-way catalytic activity and temperature operation window, as shown in Table 9 [484-498].

4.7.5 Effect of transition metal doping

Effect of different amounts of Fe-modified CeO2-ZrO2 on the physicochemical properties and catalytic behavior of TWCs for automotive emission control was investigated by Zhou et al. [496, 497]. The Pd/CZFe(1%) catalyst exhibited optimal catalytic performance for CO, HC, NO, and NO2 eliminations. The doping of 1% iron oxide promoted the formation of homogeneous Ce-Zr-Fe-O ternary solid solution, which not only facilitated the reduction of Ce4+ → Ce3+ and the generation of oxygen vacancy and then improved the interaction between Fe and Ce-Zr, but also enhanced Ce redox behavior. The introduction of cobalt oxide by the CP method considerably enhanced the catalytic activity of Pd-based TWCs with T50 for HC at 245 ℃, for CO at 161 ℃, for NO at 210 ℃, and for NO2 at 167 ℃. It should be due to the formation of more homogeneous ternary solid solution, which improved OSC and the interaction between CZO and cobalt metal. In addition, Zhou et al. [498-500] also reported the introduction of Ni promoted the redox behavior of Pd/CZO catalysts, leading to the increase of OSC of samples, and Pd/CZNi(3%) exhibited the optimal catalytic performance compared with other catalysts. Zhou et al. [501, 502] investigated the behavior of Pd supported on transition metals (M = Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) modified Ce0.67Zr0.33O2 oxides under stoichiometric CO + HC + NOx + O2 reaction conditions. The incorporation of transition metals especially Fe and Co strongly improved the oxygen mobility and greatly enhanced the OSC of CZO and the corresponding catalysts. The introduction of Fe and Co into CZO was more beneficial to forming homogeneous Ce-Zr-M-O ternary solid solution and therefore promoting the reduction of Pd/CZO. As a result, the catalytic activities of the catalysts were significantly enhanced (Fig. 27).

Fig. 27. Conversion of (a) HC, (b) NO, (c) CO, and (d) NO2 over various catalysts as a function of reaction temperature under stoichiometric CO + HC + NOx + O2. Reaction condition: NO(0.1%)-NO2(0.03%)-C3H6(0.067%)-C3H8(0.033%)-CO(0.75%)-O2(0.745%) in Ar. Reprinted from [502] with permission.
4.7.6 Mechanisms of three-way catalytic removal for the exhausts from gasoline engines over nanosize ceria-zirconium-based solid solutions

Shi et al. [483] proposed that the mechanisms of three-way catalytic removal for the exhausts from gasoline engines on Pt-Rh/Ce0.35Zr0.55Sr0.10O1.9/La-stabilized Al2O3 (LA) and Pt-Rh/Ce0.35Zr0.55Ba0.10O1.9/LA were as follows:

(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)

The first three steps (Eqs. (53)–(55)) were involved in the elimination of pollutants over TWCs. The fourth step (Eq. (56)) played a role in adjusting the ratio of oxidant/reductant. The last step referred to the reduction of NOx in TWCs at λ < 1. Steam-reforming and water-gas shift reactions would take place when H2O was present in exhaust gas. H2 would be produced to react with NO. CZO could supply active oxygen species resulting from the cerium charge transformation CeO2 ↔ Ce2O3 when alkaline-earth metal oxides were incorporated to CZO lattice. They would react with the adsorbed NO on the catalyst:

(58)

Subsequently, NO2 reacted with alkaline-earth metal oxides, for example SrO and BaO:

(59)

Then BaO-NO2 reacted with NO and produced nitrite:

(60)

Furthermore, nitrite further reacted with NO2 and produced nitrate:

(61)

Excess oxygen was stored in CZO materials (Eq. (56)) at λ > 1 based on the former step. Meanwhile, NOx was also stored in CZO materials, and then released at λ < 1 and reduced on the noble metal sites, leading to the enhancement of NOx conversion under wider air/fuel ratios.

4.7.7 Summary of cerium-zirconium-based material for three-way catalytic removal of exhausts from gasoline engines
(62)
(63)
(64)

There are two kinds of oxygen vacancies in cerium-base materials. One is produced by the revivification of Ce4+ through Eq. (62), and the other is produced by doping ions through Eqs. (63) and (64) [503-505]. The OSC and redox properties of a cerium-based oxygen storage material are closely related to the oxygen vacancy concentration, migration rate of oxygen vacancy, surface area, and the formation of anion defects [506, 507]. The lattice defects formed in the bulk of CZO can make the bulk lattice oxygen and oxygen vacancies to be used in catalytic reaction, but the OSC and thermal stability still can not meet the ever increasingly stringent emission standards. Thus, it urgently needs to further improve oxygen vacancy, lattice defect, OSC, and thermal stability of CZO. The introduction of a third metal to the CZO material may be a feasible way. The influence of extra metal doping mainly includes the following two aspects. One way is to change the radius of dopant ions to make the lattice atoms rearrangement and crystal structure producing different degrees of distortion, which can effectively reduce the diffusion resistance of oxygen in crystal lattice. The other way is to introduce a valence state lower than Ce4+ and Zr4+ cation and by the charge balance of crystal lattice to form oxygen vacancy and then improve the diffusion rate of bulk oxygen.

4.8 Nanosize cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions for CO2 transformation

The emission of CO2 originated from human activity is a significant factor resulting in the rapid global warming. The catalytic transformation of CO2 into useful stuffs is recognized to be one of the economic and effective ways to mitigate CO2 buildup [508]. The key challenge is to develop an effective catalyst that can achieve a high CO2 conversion at low temperature. Among the catalysts, CZO is one of the key components owing to its excellent OSC property and robust stability. And this part mainly focuses on three CO2 transformation reactions over CZO: methanation, reforming and chemical transformations.

4.8.1 CO2 methanation

CO2 methanation is a green and promising method for the atmospheric CO2 reduction. This process is a catalytic hydrogenation reaction (Sabatier reaction):

(65)

Much research has been devoted to this particular reaction over Ni-based CZO catalysts. Roger and co-workers [509, 510] reported that the Ce/Zr ratio and Ni loading distinctly affected the catalytic performance of Ni/CZO catalysts for CO2 methanation. The catalyst with Ce/Zr mole ratio of 72/28 and 10% Ni exhibited the best activity. Kawi et al. [511] proposed that the preparation methods can influence the catalytic activity of CO2 methanation over Ni/CZO catalysts. The catalyst prepared by ammonia evaporation showed a higher activity than the counterpart catalysts synthesized by impregnation and deposition precipitation methods due to stronger metal-support interactions between Ce and Ni species. Roger et al. [509] also found that noble metals (Rh, Ru) dopping significantly enhanced the catalytic performance of Ni/CZO catalysts for CO2 methanation due to the higher dispersion of Ni species. Wang et al. [512] investigated the effect of Ru dopping amount on Ni/CZO catalysts for CO2 methanation. Ru promoted the catalytic activity of catalyst for CO2 conversion and the catalyst with 3 wt% Ru showed the optimal activity with CO2 conversion and methane selectivity of 98.2% and 100%, respectively. Zhang et al. [513] proposed that the addition of 5 wt% Co can increase the oxygen vacancy and defect of Ni/CZO catalysts, and thereby promote the catalytic activity for CO2 methanation.

Although the reaction of CO2 methanation is a simple process, it appears to be difficult to reach a consensus on the reaction mechanism. The main controversy concentrates on the nature of intermediate compound and the formation scheme of methane. Kawi et al. [511] proposed that the mechanism of CO2 methanation on Ni/CZO catalyst was as follows. At temperature below 150 ℃, CO2 first adsorbs on the surface of Ni/CZO as mono- and/or bi-dentate carbonate, and then these carbonate species react with dissociated hydrogen to form hydrogenated carbonates. When the temperature is above 250 ℃, these hydrogenated carbonate species further react with dissociated hydrogen to generate monodentate carbonate. These intermediate species convert into formaldehyde-like and methoxy species followed by dissociating to CH4. The methanation of CO2 proceeds by CO2 direct hydrogenation to form methane without the formation of CO as intermediate.

4.8.2 Reforming with CO2 and methane

CO2 reforming of CH4 to synthesis gas is considered to be an efficient and attractive approach to eliminate green house gases. This process is called dry reforming of methane reaction:

(66)

Idem et al. [514] investigated the catalytic activity of Ni-based CZO catalysts for CO2 reforming of CH4. Compared with Ni/ZrO2 and Ni/Ce-doped ZrO2 catalysts, Ni/CZO showed higher resistance to carbon deposition due to its enhanced low-temperature reducibility. It is well known that the deactivation of catalyst induced by active metal sintering is a thorny and challenging subject in this reaction. Wang and co-workers [515] prepared a series of mesoporous CZO-supported Ni catalysts by a CTAB-assisted method. The catalyst exhibited outstanding stability and initial activity for CO2 reforming of CH4 reaction. It should be attributed to its large specific surface area and high dispersion of NiO. Liu et al. [516] synthesized a Ni/CZO/MSU-H catalyst by a hydrothermal method for CO2 reforming of CH4. Owing to the enhanced OSC for the synergistic effect between MSU-H and CZO, Ni/CZO/MSU-H presented high resistance to coke. In addition, the property of CZO could be adjusted by dopants, thus their catalytic activity for CO2 reforming of CH4 was improved. Noronha et al. [517] reported that the introduction of Al to CZO could significantly promote the oxygen mobility of the Ni/CZO/Al2O3 catalyst, and thereafter it inhibited the formation of carbon from blocking metallic particle. Idem and co-workers [518] studied the effect of metals dopping (M = Al, Ba, Ca, Hf, La, Pr, Sm, Sr, Tb, and Y) on Ni/CZMO catalysts for CO2 reforming of CH4. The results showed that the dopants increased the activity of Ni/CZMO. Especially, the doping of Ca, La, and Y considerably boosted the low-temperature activity because of the increased Ni dispersion, OSC, and reducibility. Meanwhile, the introduction of a second active metal is another important method to improve the catalytic activity of the Ni/CZO catalyst for CO2 reforming of CH4. Lee et al. [519] investigated the effect of Mg doping on the physicochemical properties and catalytic activity for CO2 reforming of CH4 over Ni/CZO. Ni-Mg/CZO showed better catalytic activity than Ni/CZO due to the improved thermal stability. Moreover, Kiennemann et al. [520] studied the influence of the introduction of the second metal (M = Co, Fe, and Rh) on Ni-M/CZO catalyst activity for CO2 reforming of CH4. The addition of Rh distinctly enhanced the activity and stability of the catalyst. In addition to Ni as active species, other metals such as Pt and Co were also supported on CZO and investigated for CO2 reforming of CH4 reaction. Resasco et al. [521] prepared a series of Pt-based CZO catalysts with different Ce/Zr ratios for CO2 reforming of CH4. It was found that Pt/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 exhibited an optimal activity and a good correlation between catalytic activity and reducibility. Su et al. [52] reported Co-based CZO catalysts with two Ce/Zr ratios (0.33/0.67, 0.6/0.4) for CO2 reforming of CH4. The catalyst with the Ce/Zr ratio of 0.6/0.4 showed a better activity due to its better reducibility, higher Co dispersion, and alkalescence of Co/Ce0.6Zr0.4O2 surface. Meanwhile, it should be noted that Pt- and Co-based CZO catalysts possess a lower activity than Ni/CZO for CO2 reforming of CH4. However, the Ni-based catalyst readily induced deactivation due to coke deposition. Thus, the introduction of a second active metal should be necessary.

Idem et al. [514, 522] proposed that the mechanism of CO2 reforming of CH4 on Ni/CZO was as follows:

(67)

where, (s) represents the active sites on Ni/CZO surface. CH4 first adsorbs on S and then dissociates to CHx fragments. The adsorbed H atoms reacts to produce H2:

(68)

CHx fragments were oxidated on Ni/CZO surface to form CO and H2:

(69)

Eq. (70) represents the oxidation of reduced sites on Ni/CZO surface by CO2 to generate CO and initial Ni/CZO. Therefore, the reaction can readily proceed forward by the highly mobile oxygen species supplied by the high OSC and reducibility of Ni/CZO.

(70)
4.8.3 CO2 for the synthesis of dimethyl carbonate

It is generally accepted that dimethyl carbonate (DMC) is an important chemical intermediate in chemical industry and direct synthesis of DMC from CO2 and methanol is an environmentally friendly chemical process [523]. Tomishige et al. [524] employed CZO as a catalyst for the synthesis of DMC from CO2 and methanol reaction. They found that the catalytic activity of catalyst is closely related to the calcination temperature, and the higher calcination temperature can induce more active surface and thereby enhance the activity. Kim et al. [525-527] reported that the catalytic activity of the catalyst for this reaction was dependent on the preparation method and the catalyst prepared by a decomposition method using adipic acid exhibited the highest specific surface area (170 m2/g) and best catalytic performance. Saha et al. [528] synthesized a highly active and stable CZO/graphene catalyst for direct synthesis of DMC from CO2 and methanol. They proposed that the introduction of grapheme significantly promoted the formation of highly crystalline nanostructures and thereby improved its activity. Jung et al. [529] prepared a series of Ga2O3-modified CZO catalysts and investigated their catalytic activity for direct synthesis of DMC from CO2 and methanol. 5 wt% Ga2O3/CZO showed the best activity. Jung and co-workers [530] further studied the effect of acidity of catalyst on the catalytic performance for synthesis of DMC from CO2 and methanol. They prepared PW12O40-modified CZO catalysts for this reaction. The results revealed that the modification of CZO by PW12O40 greatly improved the activity of catalyst for synthesis of DMC from CO2 and methanol because of the enhancement of BrØnsted acid sites provided by PW12O40 and that the acidity played a key role in influencing the catalyst activity. Liu et al. [531] for the first time prepared ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide ([EMIM]Br)-modified CZO catalyst for synthesis of DMC from CO2 and methanol. The catalytic performance of [EMIM]Br/CZO increased for DMC production, and it provided a promising alternative for the selective production of DMC from methanol and CO2.

Kumar et al. [532, 533] proposed that the mechanism of synthesis of DMC from CO2 and methanol on CZO was as follows.

CH3OH first adsorbs on acidic and basic sites of CZO surface and then dissociates to CH3+, OH, CH3O, and H+, respectively:

(71)
(72)

Then, CH3O reacts with CO2 to form CH3OCO2 on the basic sites of CZO:

(73)

Finally, CH3OCO2 reacts with CH3+ to form DMC, and H+ reacts with OH to generate H2O:

(74)
(75)
4.9 Summary of nanosize cerium-zirconium-based materials for environmental catalysis

Environmental catalysis, which can transform pollutants into harmless substances or valuable stuff, is now recognized as one of the most useful methods to reduce environmental pollution in the world [534, 535]. CZO is used as the active component, support, or oxygen storage material, and it is indispensable to purify pollutants in environmental catalysis. The main characteristics of environmental catalysts are as follows.

(a) High activity. The catalysts should be extremely efficient to remove the hazardous substances. Because the concentration of the harmful substances in exhausts is usually low, it is only the catalysts with high activity that can efficiently remove them.

(b) High selectivity. The exhaust gas compositions to be disposed are often complex, and the catalysts should possess high selectivity.

(c) High stability. The gases to be treated often contain some toxic ingredients. Therefore, the catalysts should have strong toxicity resistance, high chemical stability, and long lifetime. Moreover, the catalysts should have high thermal stability and wide operation temperature window.

(d) High adaptability. The reaction conditions for the removal of harmful substances vary dramatically. For example, the space velocity of automobile exhausts could be as high as hundreds of thousands, and the changes of the exhaust temperature vary from dozens of Celsius degrees when cold starting to seven or eight hundred Celsius degrees when speeding up.

In addition, the environmental catalysts should also possess high mechanical strength, because the amount of gases to be treated is often large. The catalysts ought to withstand the pressure of fluid flushing. Moreover, the catalysts should be easy to be prepared, cheap and wear-resisting, and low pressure drop.

CZO materials possess good redox and OSC. They are excellent environmental catalysts or acted as the assistant of precious metal catalysts. Although the lattice defects forming in CZO can be helpful to the catalytic reaction, the OSC and thermal stability should be further improved to meet the requirements of environmental catalysts for high activity, high selectivity, high stability and high adaptability. From the typical catalytic reactions described above, it can be deduced that the methods to improve the properties of CZO catalysts are as follows: (1) adopting a suitable preparation method to design and improve the microstructure texture and physicochemical properties of CZO; (2) supporting active metals to enhance catalytic performance of CZO; (3) introduction of additional components into CZO to further increase the degree of lattice oxygen deficiency, improve OSC, and then enhance the catalytic activity, selectivity, and adaptability of environmental catalysts. The addition of additional components including rare earth, transition and alkaline earth or other metals can also inhibit the transformation of crystal phase of CZO and then improve the thermal stability of environmental catalysts.

Doping rare earth oxides with variable state into CZO can not only enhance their lattice defects and improve the redox property of catalyst, but also significantly enhance lattice defects such as the number of oxygen vacancies. Additionally, doping rare earth elements into CZO can also form a ternary solid solution, which may improve the thermal stability of CZO [536].

Transition metals have unfilled valence orbit, and their properties are quite different from other elements. There are many single electrons in the electron configuration of the element in this part, which are readily to lose, so these metals have a variable valence state. The unique electron configuration of transition metals determines their good low-temperature redox properties. The previous reviews show that the introduction of transition metals into CZO can form a solid solution structure and the modified CZO exhibits good low-temperature redox properties. The transition metals supported catalysts possess a low ignition temperature, which realize the purification treatment of automobile exhaust under cold start condition. The common transition metals used for doping CZO are Mn, Cu, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cr, etc.

Alkaline earth metals can form ternary solid solution with CZO to some extent, but the solid solubility varies greatly with the change of ion radius of alkaline earth metals. The ion radii of Mg2+, Ca2+, Sr2+ and Ba2+ are 0.66, 1.12, 1.25, and 1.42 Å, respectively [537, 538]. Among them, Ca2+ and Sr2+ exhibit higher solid solubility with CZO because of their appropriate ion radii, but Mg2+ and Ba2+ show lower solid solubility with CZO. The effect of doping different alkali earth metals on the catalytic properties of CZO is different. Ca and Sr are easily distributed in the lattice of CZO to form ternary solid solution structure, which can improve the thermal stability and OSC performance of CZO based catalysts.

The oxides of Al2O3 and SiO2 can remarkably affect the catalytic performance of CZO. Although they can not be soluble with cerium and zirconium, they can interact with each other to generate new dispersive phase, which can inhibit catalyst from sintering at high temperature and improve its stability, redox and OSC performance.

5 General conclusions and perspectives

Different from the other rare earth oxides, cerium-zirconium-based solid solutions and related oxides are excellent candidate catalysts for heterogeneous catalysis due to the unique textural and structural properties, controllable composition, and good redox and OSC properties derived from the facile shift of Ce3+/Ce4+. By partial substitution of ions Ce4+ or Zr4+, the amount of nonstoichiometric oxygen and redox behavior of the materials can be changed, which would remarkably enhance the catalytic performance of these materials. Thus, cerium-zirconium-based oxides are widely applied in heterogeneous catalysis especially for environmental catalysis, such as the purification of CO, NOx, NH3, VOC, CO2, soot, etc. In addition, the cerium-zirconium-based oxides were also widely used for fuel cells, solar energy materials, and so on.

CZO-based materials are interesting for catalysis applications, and some work should be further attempted to improve the performance of CZO-based catalysts. The basic strategies according the above description include:

(a) Adopting a suitable preparation method to improve the microstructure texture and physicochemical properties of nanosize CZO;

(b) Adjusting the Ce/Zr ratio to promote the redox properties of CZO-based materials;

(c) Supporting active metals, e.g. noble metals Pt, Rh, and Pd or transitional metals Mn, Co, and Cu, etc., to enhance catalytic performance of CZO-based materials;

(d) Introducing additional components to CZO to further increase lattice oxygen deficiency, improve OSC, and enhance the catalytic activity, selectivity, and adaptability of catalysts. The addition of the third component including rare earth, transition and alkaline earth or other metals can also inhibit the transformation of crystal phase of CZO and then improve the thermal stability of catalysts.

Historically, the inventors of CZO materials in the 1970s focused on their application for removal of exhaust gases to substitute the noble metal catalysts. However, this impetus has declined mainly owing to their lower OSC and thermal stability. This weakness certainly warrants further research on the subject. The correlation between catalytic performance and solid state properties is crucial for the design and tailoring of efficient catalysts. CZO materials should be further improved to meet the requirements of environmental catalysts for the high activity, the high selectivity, the high stability, and the high adaptability. It is anticipated that further investigations will expand the understanding for their structure and physicochemical properties and contribute to the development in the practical processes for more widely fields such as catalysis and separation, energy storage and utilization, and optical or aerospace materials.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21673290, U1662103).

References
[1]
J. Lelieveld, J. S. Evans, M. Fnais, D. Giannadaki, A. Pozzer, Nature, 2015, 525, 367-371. DOI:10.1038/nature15371
[2]
B. J. Finlayson-Pitts, J. N. Jr Pitts, Science, 1997, 276, 1045-1051. DOI:10.1126/science.276.5315.1045
[3]
D. Devaiah, L. H. Reddy, S. E. Park, B. M. Reddy, Catal. Rev., 2018, 60, 177-277. DOI:10.1080/01614940.2017.1415058
[4]
P. Gao, Z. Kang, W. Fu, W. Wang, X. Bai, E. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 4197-4201. DOI:10.1021/ja9086616
[5]
C. Misra, C. Ruehl, J. Collins, D. Chernich, J. Herner, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2017, 51, 6981-6989. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.6b03218
[6]
H. Matsui, N. Ishiguro, K. Enomoto, O. Sekizawa, T. Uruga, M. Tada, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 12022-12025. DOI:10.1002/anie.201606046
[7]
Y. Hu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 89, 2949-2951.
[8]
C. Larese, F. C. Galisteo, M. L. Granados, R. Mariscal, J. L. G. Fierro, P. S. Lambrou, A. M. Efstathiou, J. Catal., 2004, 226, 443-456. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2004.06.013
[9]
C. Larese, M. L. Granados, F. C. Galisteo, R. Mariscal, J. L. G. Fierro, Appl. Catal. B, 2006, 62, 132-143. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.06.008
[10]
T. Montini, M. Melchionna, M. Monai, P. Fornasiero, Chem. Rev.,, 2016, 116, 5987-6041. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00603
[11]
M. Cargnello, J. J. D. Jaen, J. C. H. Garrido, K. Bakhmutsky, T. Montini, J. J. C. Gamez, R. J. Gorte, P. Fornasiero, Science, 2012, 337, 713-717. DOI:10.1126/science.1222887
[12]
Z. Liu, D. C. Grinter, P. G. Lustemberg, T. D. Nguyen-Phan, Y. Zhou, S. Luo, I. Waluyo, E. J. Crumlin, D. J. Stacchiola, J. Zhou, J. Carrasco, H. F. Busnengo, M. V. Ganduglia-Pirovano, S. D. Senanayake, J. A. Rodriguez, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2016, 55, 7455-7459. DOI:10.1002/anie.201602489
[13]
R. Carrasquillo-Flores, I. Ro, M. D. Kumbhalkar, S. Burt, C. A. Carrero, A. C. Alba-Rubio, J. T. Miller, I. Hermans, G. W. Huber, J. A. Dumesic, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 10317-10325. DOI:10.1021/jacs.5b05945
[14]
J. Carrasco, D. Lopez-Duran, Z. Liu, T. Duchon, J. Evans, S. D. Senanayake, E. J. Crumlin, V. Matolin, J. A. Rodriguez, M. Veronica Ganduglia-Pirovano, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 3917-3921. DOI:10.1002/anie.201410697
[15]
X. Yao, R. Zhao, L. Chen, J. Du, C. Tao, F. Yang, L. Dong, Appl. Catal. B-Environ, 2017, 208, 82-93. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.02.060
[16]
W. Xu, Z. Liu, A. C. Johnston-Peck, S. D. Senanayake, G. Zhou, D. Stacchiola, E. A. Stach, J. A. Rodriguez, ACS Catal., 2013, 3, 975-984. DOI:10.1021/cs4000969
[17]
C. Sun, H. Li, L. Chen, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 8475-8505. DOI:10.1039/c2ee22310d
[18]
H. Y. Kim, H. M. Lee, G. Henkelman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 1560-1570. DOI:10.1021/ja207510v
[19]
J. Buckeridge, D. O. Scanlon, A. Walsh, C. R. A. Catlow, A. A. Sokol, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 87, 214304.
[20]
J. C. Hernández, A. B. Hungría, J. A. Pérez-Omil, S. Trasobares, S. Bernal, P. A. Midgley, A. Alavi, J. J. Calvino, Phys J.. Chem. C, 2007, 111, 9001-9004.
[21]
C. M. Kalamaras, D. D. Dionysiou, A. M. Efstathiou, ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 2729-2742. DOI:10.1021/cs3006204
[22]
M. Li, U. Tumuluri, Z. Wu, S. Dai, ChemSusChem, 2015, 8, 3651-3660. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201500899
[23]
D. Mukherjee, B. G. Rao, B. M. Reddy, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 197, 105-115. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.042
[24]
J. Ouyang, H. Yang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 6921-6928. DOI:10.1021/jp808075t
[25]
B. M. Reddy, P. Bharali, P. Saikia, S. E. Park, M. W. E. van den Berg, M. Muhler, W. Grünert, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 11729-11737. DOI:10.1021/jp802674m
[26]
B. M. Reddy, A. Khan, Y. Yamada, T. Kobayashi, S. Loridant, J. C. Volta, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2003, 107, 11475-11484. DOI:10.1021/jp0358376
[27]
R. Sharan, A. Dutta, J. Alloys Compd., 2017, 693, 936-944. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.267
[28]
R. Si, Y. W. Zhang, L. M. Wang, S. J. Li, B. X. Lin, W. S. Chu, Z. Y. Wu, C. H. Yan, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, 787-794. DOI:10.1021/jp0630875
[29]
A. Trovarelli, Comment. Inorg. Chem., 1999, 20, 263-284. DOI:10.1080/02603599908021446
[30]
K. Yin, R. J. Davis, S. Mahamulkar, C. W. Jones, P. Agrawal, H. Shibata, A. Malek, AIChE J., 2017, 63, 725-738. DOI:10.1002/aic.15575
[31]
T. Andana, M. Piumetti, S. Bensaid, N. Russo, D. Fino, R. Pirone, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 197, 125-137. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.12.030
[32]
H. Borchert, Y. Borchert, V. V. Kaichev, I. P. Prosvirin, G. M. Alikina, A. I. Lukashevich, V. I. Zaikovskii, E. M. Moroz, E. A. Paukshtis, V. I. Bukhtiyarov, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 20077-20086. DOI:10.1021/jp051525m
[33]
A. V. Egranov, T. Y. Sizova, R. Y. Shendrik, N. A. Smirnova, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 2016, 90, 7-15. DOI:10.1016/j.jpcs.2015.11.007
[34]
S. J. Hong, A. V. Virkar, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1995, 78, 433-439. DOI:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08820.x
[35]
K. Michel, J. P. Eufinger, G. Ulbrich, M. Lerch, J. Janek, M. T. Elm, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2017, 19, 17661-17669. DOI:10.1039/C7CP03164E
[36]
E. Mamontov, T. Egami, R. Brezny, M. Koranne, S. Tyagi, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2000, 104, 11110-11116. DOI:10.1021/jp0023011
[37]
C. Loschen, A. Migani, S. T. Bromley, F. Illas, K. M. Neyman, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2008, 10, 5730-5738. DOI:10.1039/b805904g
[38]
P. Fornasiero, G. R. Rao, J. Kašpar, F. L'erario, M. Graziani, J. Catal., 1998, 175, 269-279. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1998.1999
[39]
P. Fornasiero, A. Speghini, R. Di Monte, M. Bettinelli, J. Kašpar, A. Bigotto, V. Sergo, M. Graziani, Chem. Mater., 2004, 16, 1938-1944. DOI:10.1021/cm035370b
[40]
M. Kuhn, S. Bishop, J. Rupp, H. Tuller, Acta Mater., 2013, 61, 4277-4288. DOI:10.1016/j.actamat.2013.04.001
[41]
A. Gupta, U. Waghmare, M. Hegde, Chem. Mater., 2010, 22, 5184-5198. DOI:10.1021/cm101145d
[42]
A. D. Mayernick, M. J. Janik, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 14955-14964. DOI:10.1021/jp805134s
[43]
M. Nolan, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 6671-6681. DOI:10.1021/jp112112u
[44]
Z. Fei, X. Xie, Y. Dai, H. Liu, X. Chen, J. Tang, M. Cui, X. Qiao, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2014, 53, 19438-19445. DOI:10.1021/ie503297k
[45]
E. Rohart, O. Larcher, S. Deutsch, C. Hedouin, H. Aimin, F. Fajardie, M. Allain, P. Macaudiere, Top. Catal., 2004, 30/31, 417-423. DOI:10.1023/B:TOCA.0000029784.75813.81
[46]
S. Yang, M. Besson, C. Descorme, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 165, 1-9. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.09.057
[47]
J. A. Anderson, R. A. Daley, S. Y. Christou, A. M. Efstathiou, Appl. Catal. B, 2006, 64, 189-200. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.12.007
[48]
M. Monai, T. Montini, M. Melchionna, T. Duchon, P. Kus, C. Chen, N. Tsud, L. Nasi, K. C. Prince, K. Veltruska, V. Matolin, M. M. Khader, R. J. Gorte, P. Fornasiero, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 202, 72-83. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.09.016
[49]
K. A. Pokrovski, A. T. Bell, J. Catal., 2006, 241, 276-286. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2006.05.002
[50]
R. Hu, D. Li, H. Xue, N. Zhang, Z. Liu, Z. Liu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42, 7786-7797. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.167
[51]
P. S. Lambrou, S. Y. Christou, A. P. Fotopoulos, F. K. Foti, T. N. Angelidis, A. M. Efstathiou, Appl. Catal. B, 2005, 59, 1-11. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.12.012
[52]
S. Zeng, X. Zhang, X. Fu, L. Zhang, H. Su, H. Pan, Appl. Catal. B, 2013, 136, 308-316.
[53]
J. A. Rodriguez, J. C. Hanson, J. Y. Kim, G. Liu, A. Iglesias-Juez, M. Fernández-García, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2003, 107, 3535-3543. DOI:10.1021/jp022323i
[54]
M. Yashima, H. Arashi, M. Kakihana, M. Yoshimura, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1994, 77, 1067-1071. DOI:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb07270.x
[55]
M. Yashima, K. Ohtake, M. Kakihana, M. Yoshimura, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1994, 77, 2773-2776. DOI:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb04677.x
[56]
M. Yashima, H. Takashina, M. Kakihana, M. Yoshimura, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1994, 77, 1869-1874. DOI:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb07064.x
[57]
F. Zhang, C. H. Chen, J. C. Hanson, R. D. Robinson, I. P. Herman, S. W. Chan, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2006, 89, 1028-1036. DOI:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00788.x
[58]
H. Tomaszewski, J. Strzeszewski, L. Adamowicz, V. Sergo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 85, 2855-2857.
[59]
M. Yashima, S. Sasaki, Y. Yamaguchi, M. Kakihana, M. Yoshimura, T. Mori, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1998, 72, 182-184. DOI:10.1063/1.120678
[60]
I. O. Fábregas, R. O. Fuentes, D. G. Lamas, M. E. F. De Rapp, E. W. de Reca N., M. C. Fantini, A. F. Craievich, R. J. Prado, R. P. Millen, M. L. Temperini, J. Phys. Condens. Matter, 2006, 18, 7863-7881. DOI:10.1088/0953-8984/18/34/002
[61]
M. Yashima, K. Morimoto, N. Ishizawa, M. Yoshimura, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 76, 2865-2868.
[62]
V. R. Mastelaro, V. Briois, D. P. F. de Souza, C. L. Silva, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2003, 23, 273-282. DOI:10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00188-7
[63]
P. Fornasiero, E. Fonda, R. Di Monte, G. Vlaic, J. Kašpar, M. Graziani, J. Catal., 1999, 187, 177-185. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1999.2589
[64]
G. Vlaic, P. Fornasiero, S. Geremia, J. Kašpar, M. Graziani, J. Catal., 1997, 168, 386-392. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1997.1644
[65]
G. Vlaic, R. Di Monte, P. Fornasiero, E. Fonda, J. Kašpar, M. Graziani, J. Catal., 1999, 182, 378-389. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1998.2335
[66]
T. Montini, A. Speghini, L. De Rogatis, B. Lorenzut, M. Bettinelli, M. Graziani, P. Fornasiero, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 13155-13160. DOI:10.1021/ja905158p
[67]
P. Fornasiero, T. Montini, M. Graziani, J. Kašpar, A. B. Hungria, A. Martinez-Arias, J. C. Conesa, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2002, 4, 149-159. DOI:10.1039/b106765f
[68]
T. Montini, M. A. Banares, N. Hickey, R. Di Monte, P. Fornasiero, J. Kašpar, M. Graziani, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2004, 6, 1-3.
[69]
S. Otsuka-Yao-Matsuo, T. Omata, N. Izu, H. Kishimoto, J. Solid State Chem., 1998, 138, 47-54. DOI:10.1006/jssc.1998.7753
[70]
J. C. Conesa, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2003, 107, 8840-8853. DOI:10.1021/jp0340156
[71]
Z. Hui, G. Nicolas, V. Françoise, P. Michèle, Solid State Ionics, 2003, 160, 317-326. DOI:10.1016/S0167-2738(03)00207-8
[72]
S. Lemaux, A. Bensaddik, A. M. J. Van der Eerden, J. H. Bitter, D. C. Koningsberger, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 4810-4815. DOI:10.1021/jp003111t
[73]
P. Fornasiero, G. Balducci, R. Di Monte, J. Kašpar, V. Sergo, G. Gubitosa, A. Ferrero, M. Graziani, J. Catal., 1996, 164, 173-183. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1996.0373
[74]
J. Kašpar, P. Fornasiero, J. Solid State Chem., 2003, 171, 19-29. DOI:10.1016/S0022-4596(02)00141-X
[75]
R. Di Monte, J. Kašpar, Catal. Today, 2005, 100, 27-35. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2004.11.005
[76]
A. I. Kozlov, D. H. Kim, A. Yezerets, P. Andersen, H. H. Kung, M. C. Kung, J. Catal., 2002, 209, 417-426. DOI:10.1006/jcat.2002.3644
[77]
X. Liu, K. Zhou, L. Wang, B. Wang, Y. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 3140-3141. DOI:10.1021/ja808433d
[78]
D. R. Sellick, A. Aranda, T. Garcia, J. M. Lopez, B. Solsona, A. M. Mastral, D. J. Morgan, A. F. Carley, S. H. Taylor, Appl. Catal. B-Environ, 2013, 132-132, 98-106.
[79]
X. D. Wu, J. Fan, R. Ran, D. Weng, Chem. Eng. J., 2005, 109, 133-139. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2005.04.003
[80]
N. N. Gavrilova, V. V. Nazarov, Inorg. Mater., 2018, 54, 831-839. DOI:10.1134/S0020168518080071
[81]
M. Ozawa, M. Kimura, A. Isogai, J. Alloys Compd., 1993, 193, 73-75.
[82]
T. Murota, T. Hasegawa, S. Aozasa, H. Matsui, M. Motoyama, J. Alloys Compd., 1993, 193, 298-299. DOI:10.1016/0925-8388(93)90377-Y
[83]
C. Bozo, F. Gaillard, N. Guilhaume, Appl. Catal. A, 2001, 220, 69-77. DOI:10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00710-4
[84]
O. A. Kirichenko, G. W. Graham, W. Chun, R. W. McCabe, Stud., 1998, 118, 411-420.
[85]
C. E. Hori, A. Brenner, K.Y. S. Ng, K. M. Rahmoellerc, D. Belton, Catal. Today, 1999, 50, 299-308. DOI:10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00511-2
[86]
A. Cabanas, J. A. Darr, M. Poliakoff, E. Lester, Chem. Commun., 2000, 901-902.
[87]
M. Hirano, T. Miwa, M. Inagaki, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2001, 84, 1728-1732.
[88]
A. P. Oliveira, M. L. Torem, Powder Technol., 2001, 119, 181-193. DOI:10.1016/S0032-5910(00)00422-8
[89]
D. Terribile, A. Trovarelli, J. Llorca, C. de Leitenburg, G. Dolcetti, Catal. Today, 1998, 43, 79-88. DOI:10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00136-9
[90]
M. P. Kapoor, A. Raj, Y. Matsumura, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2001, 44-45, 565-572.
[91]
L. Yin, Y. Wang, G. Pang, Y. Koltypin, A. Gedanken, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2002, 246, 78-84. DOI:10.1006/jcis.2001.8047
[92]
C. C. Chuang, H. I. Hsiang, F. S. Yen, C. C. Chen, S. J. Yang, Ceram. Int., 2013, 39, 1717-1722. DOI:10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.08.016
[93]
Y. Zhou, L. Lan, M. Gong, Y. Chen, J. Mater. Sci., 2016, 51, 4283-4295. DOI:10.1007/s10853-016-9733-x
[94]
M. Thammachart, V. Meeyoo, T. Rirksomboon, S. Osuwan, Catal. Today, 2001, 68, 53-61. DOI:10.1016/S0920-5861(01)00322-4
[95]
H. Liang, S. Wu, Y. Hong, S. Li, Y. Chen, X. Yu, D. Ye, Catal. Lett., 2014, 144, 685-690. DOI:10.1007/s10562-014-1195-7
[96]
M. Chen, P. Z. Zheng, Z. B. Hang, X. M. Zheng, J. Inorg. Mater., 2004, 19, 661-665.
[97]
Q. Yuan, Q. Liu, W. G. Song, W. Feng, W. L. Pu, L. D. Sun, Y. W. Zhang, C. H. Yan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 6698-6699. DOI:10.1021/ja070908q
[98]
S. Abdollahzadeh-Ghom, C. Zamani, T. Andreu, M. Epifani, J. R. Morante, Appl. Catal. B, 2011, 108-109, 32-38.
[99]
Y. Wei, J. Liu, Z. Zhao, A. Duan, G. Jiang, C. Xu, J. Gao, H. He, X. Wang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4, 2959-2970. DOI:10.1039/c0ee00813c
[100]
Y. Wei, J. Jiao, X. Zhang, B. Jin, Z. Zhao, J. Xiong, Y. Li, J. Liu, J. Li, Nanoscale, 2017, 9, 4558-4571. DOI:10.1039/C7NR00326A
[101]
Y. Wei, J. Liu, Z. Zhao, A. Duan, G. Jiang, J. Catal., 2012, 287, 13-29. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2011.11.006
[102]
G. Zhang, Z. Zhao, J. Liu, G. Jiang, A. Duan, J. Zheng, S. Chen, R. Zhou, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 457-459. DOI:10.1039/B915027G
[103]
G. Zhang, Z. Zhao, J. Xu, J. Zheng, J. Liu, G. Jiang, A. Duan, H. He, Appl. Catal. B, 2011, 107, 302-315. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.07.029
[104]
Y. Wei, J. Liu, Z. Zhao, G. Jiang, A. Duan, H. He, X. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2010, 31, 283-288. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(09)60050-4
[105]
E. Matijevic, W. P. Hsu, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1987, 118, 506-523. DOI:10.1016/0021-9797(87)90486-3
[106]
C. S. Wright, R. I. Walton, D. Thompsett, J. Fisher, S. E. Ashbrook, Adv. Mater., 2007, 19, 4500-4504. DOI:10.1002/adma.200602474
[107]
J. R. Kim, W. J. Myeong, S. K. Ihm, Appl. Catal. B, 2007, 71, 57-63. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.08.015
[108]
D. Rangappa, T. Naka, A. Kondo, M. Ishii, T. Kobayashi, T. Adschiri, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 11061-11066. DOI:10.1021/ja0711009
[109]
D. Rangappa, S. Ohara, T. Naka, A. Kondo, M. Ishii, T. Adschiri, J. Mater. Chem., 2007, 17, 4426-4429. DOI:10.1039/b705760a
[110]
M. K. Devaraju, X. Liu, K. Yusuke, S. Yin, T. Sato, J. Mater. Sci., 2009, 20, 405606.
[111]
B. M. Reddy, G. K. Reddy, I. Ganesh, J. M. F. Ferreira, Mater J.. Sci., 2009, 44, 2743-2751. DOI:10.1007/s10853-009-3358-2
[112]
W. Chen, F. Li, J. Yu, L. Liu, H. Gao, Mater. Res. Bull., 2006, 41, 2318-2324. DOI:10.1016/j.materresbull.2006.04.024
[113]
Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Z. Mu, P. Yu, X. Ni, S. Wang, L. Zheng, Appl. Catal. B, 2007, 76, 335-347. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.06.011
[114]
S. N. Mlondo, P. J. Thomos, P. O'Brien, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 6072-6073. DOI:10.1021/ja901126n
[115]
J. Gong, X. Bao, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 1770-1771. DOI:10.1039/C7CS90022H
[116]
Q. Wang, Z. Li, B. Zhao, G. Li, R. Zhou, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2011, 344, 132-137. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2011.05.011
[117]
M. Sanchez-Dominguez, M. Boutonnet, C. Solans, J. Nanopart. Res., 2009, 11, 1823-1829. DOI:10.1007/s11051-009-9660-8
[118]
H. Yang, C. Du, W. Yang, C. Huang, X. Zhang, Mater. Rev., 2004, 18, 25-28.
[119]
J. Y. Chane-Ching, F. Cobo, D. Aubert, H. G. Harvey, M. Airiau, A. Corma, Chem. Eur. J., 2005, 11, 979-987. DOI:10.1002/chem.200400535
[120]
L. Xu, H. Song, L. Chou, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37, 18001-18020. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.09.128
[121]
K. S. Suslick, M. M. Fang, T. Hyeon, M. M. Mdleleni, in: L. A. Crum, T. J. Mason, J. L. Reisse, K. S. Suslick eds, Sonochemistry and Sonoluminescence, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999, NATO ASI Series C, Vol. 524, 291-320.
[122]
A. Gurav, T. Kodas, T. Pluym, Y. Xiong, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 1993, 19, 411-452. DOI:10.1080/02786829308959650
[123]
J. Guo, X. Xin, X. Zhang, S. Zhang, J. Nanopart. Res., 2009, 11, 737-741. DOI:10.1007/s11051-008-9504-y
[124]
C. Cau, Y. Guari, T. Chave, J. Larionova, P. Pochon, S. I. Nikitenko, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117, 22827-22833. DOI:10.1021/jp407096p
[125]
A. Trovarelli, F. Zamar, J. Llorca, C. De Leitenburg, G. Dolcetti, J. T. Kiss, J. Catal., 1997, 169, 490-502. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1997.1705
[126]
E. Aneggi, V. Rico-Perez, C. de Leitenburg, S. Maschio, L. Soler, J. Llorca, A. Trovarelli, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 14010-14043.
[127]
W. T. Gibbons, L. J. Venstrom, R. M. De Smith, J. H. Davidson, G. S. Jackson, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2014, 16, 14271-14280. DOI:10.1039/C4CP01974A
[128]
M. Kim, R. M. Laine, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 9220-9229. DOI:10.1021/ja9017545
[129]
J. C. Yu, L. Zhang, J. Lin, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2003, 260, 240-243. DOI:10.1016/S0021-9797(02)00168-6
[130]
R. Strobel, H. J. Metz, S. E. Pratsinis, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 6346-6351. DOI:10.1021/cm800622a
[131]
Y. Zhang, D. Kang, C. Saquing, M. Aindow, C. Erkey, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2005, 44, 4161-4164. DOI:10.1021/ie050345w
[132]
S. A. Kondrat, S. H. Taylor, Catalysis, 2014, 26, 218-248.
[133]
D. Das, G. Thrimurthulu, K. Lakshmi, B. M. Reddy, Int. J. Nanotechnol., 2010, 7, 1166-1177. DOI:10.1504/IJNT.2010.034720
[134]
B. M. Reddy, P. Bharali, Y. H. Seo, E. A. Prasetyanto, S. E. Park, Catal. Lett., 2008, 126, 125-133. DOI:10.1007/s10562-008-9591-5
[135]
B. M. Reddy, G. K. Reddy, I. Ganesh, J. M. F. Ferreira, Catal. Lett., 2009, 130, 227-234. DOI:10.1007/s10562-009-9870-9
[136]
B. M. Reddy, G. K. Reddy, L. Katta, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2010, 319, 52-57. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2009.11.020
[137]
G. R. Li, D. L. Qu, Y. X. Tong, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 2704-2709. DOI:10.1021/jp808016b
[138]
I. Avramova, D. Stoychev, T. Marinova, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2006, 253, 1365-1370. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.02.011
[139]
L. M. Toscani, M. G. Zimicz, J. R. Casanova, S. A. Larrondo, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39, 8759-8766. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.035
[140]
S. Manjunatha, M. S. Dharmaprakash, ACS Catal., 2018, 5, 035043.
[141]
I. I. Soykal, H. Sohn, D. Singh, J. T. Miller, U. S. Ozkan, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 585-592. DOI:10.1021/cs400908h
[142]
R. Di Monte, P. Fornasiero, S. Desinan, J. Kašpar, J. M. Gatica, J. J. Calvino, E. Fonda, Chem. Mater., 2004, 16, 4273-4285. DOI:10.1021/cm048829q
[143]
X. Weng, B. Perston, X. Z. Wang, I. Abrahams, T. Lin, S. Yang, J. R. G. Evans, D. J. Morgan, A. F. Carley, M. Bowker, J. C. Knowles, I. Rehman, J. A. Darr, Appl. Catal. B, 2009, 90, 405-415. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.03.031
[144]
M. Soh, D. W. Kang, H. G. Jeong, D. Kim, D. Y. Kim, W. Yang, C. Song, S. Baik, I. Y. Choi, S. K. Ki, H. J. Kwon, T. Kim, C. K. Kim, S. H. Lee, T. Hyeon, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 11399-11403. DOI:10.1002/anie.201704904
[145]
R. Si, Y. W. Zhang, L. P. You, C. H. Yan, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 5994-6000. DOI:10.1021/jp057501x
[146]
Y. Du, J. Zhang, H. He, J. Chin. Rare Earth Soc., 2003, 21(S2), 44-47.
[147]
J. Liu, Z. Zhao, C. Xu, A. Duan, L. Wang, S. Zhang, Catal. Commun., 2007, 8, 220-224. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2006.06.016
[148]
C. Chen, Y. Yu, W. Li, C. Cao, P. Li, Z. Dou, W. Song, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 12836-12841. DOI:10.1039/c1jm11685a
[149]
G. R. Li, D. L. Qu, Y. X. Tong, Electrochem. Commun., 2008, 10, 80-84. DOI:10.1016/j.elecom.2007.11.003
[150]
T. Y. Yu, J. Joo, Y. I. Park, T. Hyeon, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 7411-7414. DOI:10.1002/anie.200500992
[151]
Y. Du, S. Shi, H. He, H. Dai, Particuology, 2011, 9, 63-68. DOI:10.1016/j.partic.2010.07.002
[152]
A. Chen, Y. Zhou, N. Ta, Y. Li, W. Shen, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, 5, 4184-4192. DOI:10.1039/C5CY00564G
[153]
W. T. Chen, K. B. Chen, M. F. Wang, S. F. Weng, C. S. Lee, M. C. Lin, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 3286-3288. DOI:10.1039/b923217f
[154]
R. Gao, D. Zhang, P. Maitarad, L. Shi, T. Rungrotmongkol, H. Li, J. Zhang, W. Cao, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117, 10502-10511. DOI:10.1021/jp400984z
[155]
P. Maitarad, D. Zhang, R. Gao, L. Shi, H. Li, L. Huang, T. Rungrotmongkol, J. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117, 9999-10006.
[156]
Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, J. Deng, H. Dai, H. He, Inorg. Chem., 2009, 48, 2181-2192. DOI:10.1021/ic802195j
[157]
L. Yan, X. Xing, R. Yu, L. Qiao, J. Chen, J. Deng, G. Liu, Scripta Mater., 2007, 56, 301-304. DOI:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.09.013
[158]
W. Q. Han, L. J. Wu, Y. M. Zhu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 12814-12815. DOI:10.1021/ja054533p
[159]
N. Karousis, I. Suarez-Martinez, C. P. Ewels, N. Tagmatarchis, Chem. Rev., 2016, 116, 4850-4883. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00611
[160]
M. Prato, Nature, 2010, 465, 172-173. DOI:10.1038/465172a
[161]
R. O. Fuentes, L. M. Acuna, M. G. Zimic, D. G. Lamas, J. G. Sacanell, A. G. Leyva, R. T. Baker, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 7356-7363. DOI:10.1021/cm801680c
[162]
Y. C. Chen, K. B. Chen, C. S. Lee, M. Lin, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 5031-5034. DOI:10.1021/jp810492s
[163]
E. L. Crepaldi, G. J. A. A. de Soler-Illia, A. Bouchara, D. Grosso, D. Durand, C. Sanchez, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 347-351. DOI:10.1002/anie.200390113
[164]
X. Luo, B. Zhu, C. Xia, G. Niklasson, C. Granqvist, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 1998, 53, 341-347. DOI:10.1016/S0927-0248(98)00028-2
[165]
M. Veszelei, L. Kullman, A. Azens, C. G. Granqvist, B. Hjörvarsson, J. Appl. Phys., 1997, 81, 2024-2026. DOI:10.1063/1.364059
[166]
T. Brezesinski, M. Antonietti, M. Groenewolt, N. Pinna, B. Smarsly, New J. Chem., 2005, 29, 237-242. DOI:10.1039/B412306A
[167]
I. L. Violi, A. Zelcer, M. M. Bruno, V. Luca, G. J. A. A. Soler-Illia, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7, 1114-1121. DOI:10.1021/am5065188
[168]
P. Hartmann, T. Brezesinski, J. Sann, A. Lotnyk, J. P. Eufinger, L. Kienle, J. Janek, ACS Nano, 2013, 7, 2999-3013. DOI:10.1021/nn400255w
[169]
X. Liang, X. Wang, Y. Zhuang, B. Xu, S. Kuang, Y. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 2736-2737. DOI:10.1021/ja7109629
[170]
J. Wang, W. Xu, L. Chen, Y. Jia, L. Wang, X. J. Huang, J. Liu, Chem. Eng. J., 2013, 231, 198-205. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2013.07.022
[171]
D. Terribile, A. Trovarelli, J. Llorca, C. de Leitenburg, G. Dolcetti, J. Catal., 1998, 178, 299-308. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1998.2152
[172]
A. S. Deshpande, N. Pinna, B. Smarsly, M. Antonietti, M. Niederberger, Small, 2005, 1, 313-316. DOI:10.1002/smll.200400060
[173]
R. Si, Y. W. Zhang, C. X. Xiao, S. J. Li, B. X. Lin, Y. Kou, C. H. Yan, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2004, 6, 1056-1063. DOI:10.1039/B314885H
[174]
M. Crocker, U. M. Graham, R. Gonzalez, G. Jacobs, E. Morris, A. M. Rubel, R. Andrews, J. Mater. Sci., 2007, 42, 3454-3464. DOI:10.1007/s10853-006-0829-6
[175]
Y. Gu, S. Feng, J. Li, X. Gu, M. Wang, J. Rare Earths, 2007, 25, 710-714. DOI:10.1016/S1002-0721(08)60012-5
[176]
A. S. Deshpande, M. Niederberger, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2007, 101, 413-418. DOI:10.1016/j.micromeso.2006.11.036
[177]
B. Puertolas, B. Solsona, S. Agouram, R. Murillo, A. M. Mastral, A. Aranda, S. H. Taylor, T. Garcia, Appl. Catal. B, 2010, 93, 395-405. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.10.014
[178]
C. Li, X. Gu, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, X. Liu, G. Lu, J. Rare Earths, 2009, 27, 211-215. DOI:10.1016/S1002-0721(08)60221-5
[179]
S. Li, J. Zheng, W. Yang, Y. Zhao, Y. Liu, J. Porous Mater., 2008, 15, 589-592. DOI:10.1007/s10934-007-9137-z
[180]
S. Li, J. Zheng, Y. Zhao, Y. Liu, J. Porous Mater., 2009, 16, 553-556. DOI:10.1007/s10934-008-9232-9
[181]
Y. Cheng, J. Liu, Z. Zhao, Y. Wei, W. Song, C. Xu, Environ. Sci. Nano, 2017, 4, 1168-1177. DOI:10.1039/C7EN00170C
[182]
Y. Cheng, W. Song, J. Liu, H. Zheng, Z. Zhao, C. Xu, Y. Wei, E. J. M. Hensen, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 3883-3892. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b03387
[183]
Y. Wei, J. Liu, Z. Zhao, C. Xu, A. Duan, G. Jiang, Appl. Catal. A, 2013, 453, 250-261. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2012.12.013
[184]
Y. Cheng, J. Liu, Z. Zhao, W. Song, Y. Wei, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2017, 167, 219-228. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2017.04.023
[185]
H. Arandiyan, H. Dai, K. Ji, H. Sun, J. Li, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 1781-1793. DOI:10.1021/cs501773h
[186]
W. Xu, J. Wang, L. Wang, G. Sheng, J. Liu, H. Yu, X. J. Huang, J. Hazard. Mater., 2013, 260, 498-507. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.06.010
[187]
C. M. Ho, J. C. Yu, X. C. Wang, S. Y. Lai, Y. F. Qiu, J. Mater. Chem., 2005, 15, 2193-2201. DOI:10.1039/b500902b
[188]
J. Xiong, Q. Wu, X. Mei, J. Liu, Y. Wei, Z. Zhao, D. Wu, J. Li, ACS Catal., 2018, 8, 7915-7930. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.8b01924
[189]
G. R. Li, D. L. Qu, Y. X. Tong, J. Phys. Chem. C., 2009, 113, 2704-2709. DOI:10.1021/jp808016b
[190]
B. Li, X. Wei, W. Pan, J. Power Sources, 2009, 193, 598-601. DOI:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.04.050
[191]
M. Ozawa, M. Takahashi-Morita, K. Kobayashi, M. Haneda, Catal. Today, 2017, 281, 482-489. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2016.06.029
[192]
S. I. Matsumoto, Catal. Today, 2004, 90, 183-190. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2004.04.048
[193]
S. Bernal, G. Blanco, J. J. Calvino, J. C. Hernandez, J. A. Perez-Omil, J. M. Pintado, M. R. Yeste, J. Alloys Compd., 2008, 451, 521-525. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.04.201
[194]
M. Sugiura, Catal. Surv. Asia, 2003, 7, 77-87. DOI:10.1023/A:1023488709527
[195]
J. Wang, H. Chen, Z. Hu, M. Yao, Y. Li, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 2015, 57, 79-144. DOI:10.1080/01614940.2014.977059
[196]
K. Wu, L. D. Sun, C. H. Yan, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 6, 1600501.
[197]
A. Arango-Diaz, J. A. Cecilia, E. Moretti, A. Talon, P. Nunez, J. Marrero-Jerez, J. Jimenez-Jimenez, A. Jimenez-Lopez, E. Rodriguez-Castellon, Int. Hydrogen J. Energy, 2014, 39, 4102-4108. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.062
[198]
K. Liu, A. Wang, T. Zhang, ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 1165-1178. DOI:10.1021/cs200418w
[199]
E. Moretti, L. Storaro, A. Talon, P. Riello, A. I. Molina, E. Rodriguez-Castellon, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 168-169, 385-395.
[200]
H. Choi, J. Kim, S. J. Choung, J. Kim, M. R. Othman, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2017, 172, 688-693. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2017.07.026
[201]
M. Boaro, C. De Leitenburg, G. Dolcetti, A. Trovarelli, J. Catal., 2000, 193, 338-347. DOI:10.1006/jcat.2000.2887
[202]
Z. Zhao, X. Lin, R. Jin, Y. Dai, G. Wang, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2012, 2, 554-563. DOI:10.1039/C1CY00280E
[203]
P. Bharali, P. Saikia, L. Katta, B. M. Reddy, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2013, 19, 327-336. DOI:10.1016/j.jiec.2012.08.021
[204]
J. L. Ayastuy, A. Gurbani, M. P. González-Marcos, M. A. Gutiérrez-Ortiz, Appl. Catal. A, 2010, 387, 119-128. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2010.08.015
[205]
Y. Z. Chen, B. J. Liaw, H. C. Chen, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2006, 31, 427-435. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.11.004
[206]
B. M. Reddy, P. Lakshmanan, P. Bharali, P. Saikia, G. Thrimurthulu, M. Muhler, W. Grünert, J. Phys. Chem C, 2007, 111, 10478-10483.
[207]
M. Teng, L. Luo, X. Yang, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2009, 119, 158-164. DOI:10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.10.019
[208]
Z. Zhao, R. Jin, T. Bao, X. Lin, G. Wang, Appl. Catal. B, 2011, 110, 154-163. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.08.038
[209]
J. Liu, B. Liu, Y. Fang, Z. Zhao, Y. Wei, X. Q. Gong, C. Xu, A. Duan, G. Jiang, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2014, 48, 12403-12410. DOI:10.1021/es5027008
[210]
Z. Yang, T. K. Woo, K. Hermansson, Appl. Catal. B, 2006, 124, 224704.
[211]
Y. Tang, H. Zhang, L. Cui, C. Ouyang, S. Shi, W. Tang, H. Li, J. S. Lee, L. Chen, Phys. Rev. B, 2010, 82, 125104. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.82.125104
[212]
M. Boaro, F. Giordano, S. Recchia, V. Dal Santo, M. Giona, A. Trovarelli, Appl. Catal. B, 2004, 52, 225-237. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.03.021
[213]
W. S. Epling, L. E. Campbell, A. Yezerets, N. W. Currier, J. E. Parks, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 2004, 46, 163-245. DOI:10.1081/CR-200031932
[214]
I. Atribak, A. Bueno-López, A. Garcia-Garcia, J. Catal., 2008, 259, 123-132. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2008.07.016
[215]
A. Bueno-López, D. Lozano-Castelló, I. Such-Basáñez, J. M. García-Cortés, M. J. Illán-Gómez, C. S. M. de Lecea, Appl. Catal. B, 2005, 58, 1-7. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.11.012
[216]
I. Atribak, N. Guillen-Hurtado, A. Bueno-Lopez, A. Garcia-Garcia, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2010, 256, 7706-7712. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.06.042
[217]
W. Cai, Q. Zhong, S. Zhang, W. Zhao, Chem. Eng. J., 2014, 236, 223-232. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.032
[218]
W. Cai, Q. Zhong, W. Zhao, Y. Bu, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 158-159, 258-268.
[219]
W. Cai, Q. Zhong, W. Zhao, Chem. Eng. J., 2014, 246, 328-336. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2014.02.090
[220]
W. Cai, Q. Zhong, J. Ding, Y. Bu, Chem. Eng. J., 2015, 270, 1-8. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2015.02.009
[221]
D. Shang, Q. Zhong, W. Cai, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2015, 399, 18-24. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2015.01.015
[222]
M. Ehn, J. A. Thornton, E. Kleist, M. Sipila, H. Junninen, I. Pullinen, M. Springer, F. Rubach, R. Tillmann, B. Lee, F. Lopez-Hilfiker, S. Andres, I. H. Acir, M. Rissanen, T. Jokinen, S. Schobesberger, J. Kangasluoma, J. Kontkanen, T. Nieminen, T. Kurten, L. B. Nielsen, S. Jorgensen, H. G. Kjaergaard, M. Canagaratna, M. Dal Maso, T. Berndt, T. Petaja, A. Wahner, V. M. Kerminen, M. Kulmala, D. R. Worsnop, J. Wildt, T. F. Mentel, Nature, 2014, 506, 476-479. DOI:10.1038/nature13032
[223]
M. S. Kamal, S. A. Razzak, M. M. Hossain, Atmos. Environ., 2016, 140, 117-134. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.05.031
[224]
I. Ben Said, K. Sadouki, S. Masse, T. Coradin, L. S. Smiri, S. Fessi, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 2018, 260, 93-101. DOI:10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.10.044
[225]
K. Eguchi, H. Arai, Catal. Today, 1996, 29, 379-386. DOI:10.1016/0920-5861(95)00308-8
[226]
Z. Zhang, Q. Yang, H. Chen, K. Chen, X. Lu, P. Ouyang, J. Fu, J. G. Chen, Green Chem., 2018, 20, 197-205. DOI:10.1039/C7GC02774E
[227]
S. Pengpanich, V. Meeyoo, T. Rirksomboon, K. Bunyakiat, Appl. Catal. A, 2002, 234, 221-233. DOI:10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00230-2
[228]
L. Ma, M. F. Luo, L. F. Han, S. Y. Chen, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 2000, 70, 357-362. DOI:10.1023/A:1010313605332
[229]
Z. Zhou, S. Ji, F. Yin, Z. Lu, C. Li, J. Fuel Chem. Technol., 2007, 35, 583-588. DOI:10.1016/S1872-5813(07)60035-8
[230]
Y. Zhang, J. Deng, L. Zhang, W. Qiu, H. Dai, H. He, Catal. Today, 2008, 139, 29-36. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2008.08.005
[231]
C. Bozo, N. Guilhaume, J. M. Herrmann, J. Catal., 2001, 203, 393-406. DOI:10.1006/jcat.2001.3320
[232]
Z. M. Liu, Y. Q. Chen, J. B. Zhong, J. L. Wang, S. H. Yan, M. C. Gong, J. Rare Earths, 2007, 25, 585-589. DOI:10.1016/S1002-0721(07)60567-5
[233]
L. F. Liotta, G. Di Carlo, G. Pantaleo, G. Deganello, Appl. Catal. B, 2007, 70, 314-322. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.12.023
[234]
C. Bozo, N. Guilhaume, E. Garbowski, M. Primet, Catal. Today, 2000, 59, 33-45. DOI:10.1016/S0920-5861(00)00270-4
[235]
M. Li, X. Wu, J. Wan, S. Liu, R. Ran, D. Weng, Catal. Today, 2015, 242, 322-328. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2014.05.042
[236]
G. Wang, M. Meng, Y. Zha, T. Ding, Fuel, 2010, 89, 2244-2251. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2010.03.031
[237]
G. Wang, R. You, M. Meng, Fuel, 2013, 103, 799-804. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2012.08.051
[238]
Y. Zheng, Y. Zheng, Y. Xiao, G. Cai, K. Wei, Catal. Commun., 2013, 39, 1-4. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2013.04.022
[239]
D. Terribile, A. Trovarelli, C. de Leitenburg, A. Primavera, G. Dolcetti, Catal. Today, 1999, 47, 133-140. DOI:10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00292-2
[240]
S. S. Deshmukh, M. Zhang, V. I. Kovalchuk, J. L. D'Itri, Appl. Catal. B, 2003, 45, 135-145. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(03)00128-0
[241]
N. Kamiuchi, M. Haneda, M. Ozawa, Catal. Today, 2015, 241, 100-106. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2014.04.004
[242]
D. Homsi, S. Aouad, J. El Nakat, B. El Khoury, P. Obeid, E. Abi-Aad, A. AboukaÏs, Catal. Commun., 2011, 12, 776-780. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2011.01.014
[243]
C. Hu, Q. Zhu, Z. Jiang, Powder Technol., 2009, 194, 109-114. DOI:10.1016/j.powtec.2009.03.035
[244]
P. Topka, L. Kaluža, J. Gaálová, Chem. Pap., 2016, 70, 898-906.
[245]
L. Zhao, Q. Zhang, M. Luo, B. Teng, Xie Yu., J. Rare Earths, 2007, 25, 715-720. DOI:10.1016/S1002-0721(08)60013-7
[246]
W. Tan, G. Guo, J. Deng, S. Xie, H. Yang, Y. Jiang, H. Dai, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2014, 53, 18452-18461. DOI:10.1021/ie503784e
[247]
W. Tan, J. Deng, S. Xie, H. Yang, Y. Jiang, G. Guo, H. Dai, Nanoscale, 2015, 7, 8510-8523. DOI:10.1039/C5NR00614G
[248]
Q. F. Deng, T. Z. Ren, A. Bao, Y. Liu, Z. Y. Yuan, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2014, 20, 3303-3312. DOI:10.1016/j.jiec.2013.12.012
[249]
P. Kaminski, M. Ziolek, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 187, 328-341. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.01.040
[250]
M. Zhao, X. Li, L. Zhang, C. Zhang, M. Gong, Y. Chen, Catal. Today, 2011, 175, 430-434. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2011.05.014
[251]
Y. Y. Liu, T. Hayakawa, T. Ishii, M. Kumagai, H. Yasuda, K. Suzuki, S. Hamakawa, K. Murata, Appl. Catal. A, 2001, 210, 301-314. DOI:10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00817-6
[252]
T. Rao, M. Shen, L. Jia, J. Hao, J. Wang, Catal. Commun., 2007, 8, 1743-1747. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2007.01.036
[253]
H. Cao, W. Song, M. Gong, J. Wang, S. Yan, Z. Liu, Y. Chen, J. Nat. Gas Chem., 2009, 18, 83-87. DOI:10.1016/S1003-9953(08)60088-2
[254]
J. Gaálová, P. Topka, L. Kaluža, O. Šolcová, Catal. Today, 2011, 175, 231-237. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2011.05.011
[255]
S. Azalim, M. Franco, R. Brahmi, J. M. Giraudon, J. F. Lamonier, J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, 188, 422-427. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.135
[256]
R. Pagadala, S. Maddila, S. Rana, S. B. Jonnalagadda, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 6602-6607. DOI:10.1039/c3ra47145d
[257]
Y. Yang, X. Xu, K. Sun, J. Hazard. Mater., 2007, 139, 140-145. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.010
[258]
S. Li, Q. Hao, R. Zhao, D. Liu, H. Duan, B. Dou, Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 285, 536-543. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2015.09.097
[259]
H. Y. Cao, J. L. Wang, S. H. Yan, Z. M. Liu, M. C. Gong, Y. Q. Chen, Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin., 2012, 28, 1936-1942.
[260]
B. de Rivas, R. Lopez-Fonseca, C. Sampedro, J. I. Gutierez-Ortiz, Appl. Catal. B, 2009, 90, 545-555. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.04.017
[261]
L. Matejova, P. Topka, L. Kaluza, S. Pitkaaho, S. Ojala, J. Gaalova, R. L. Keiski, Appl. Catal. B, 2013, 142, 54-64.
[262]
B. de Rivas, C. Sampedro, M. Garcia-Real, R. Lopez-Fonseca, J. I. Gutierrez-Ortiz, Appl. Catal. B, 2013, 129, 225-235. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.09.026
[263]
N. Li, C. Descorme, M. Besson, Catal. Commun., 2007, 8, 1815-1819.
[264]
J. I. Gutiérrez-Ortiz, B. de Rivas, R. López-Fonseca, J. R. González-Velasco, Catal. Today, 2005, 107-108, 933-941.
[265]
B. de Rivas, R. López-Fonseca, J. R. González-Velasco, J. I. Gutiérrez-Ortiz, Catal. Commun., 2008, 9, 2018-2021. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2008.03.039
[266]
M. M. R. Feijen-Jeurissen, J. J. Jorna, B. E. Nieuwenhuys, G. Sinquin, C. Petit, J. P. Hindermann, Catal. Today, 1999, 54, 65-79. DOI:10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00169-8
[267]
B. de Rivas, J. I. Gutierrez-Ortiz, R. Lopez-Fonseca, J. R. Gonzalez-Velasco, Appl. Catal. A, 2006, 314, 54-63. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2006.08.005
[268]
A. Bueno-López, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 146, 1-11. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.02.033
[269]
E. Aneggi, C. de Leitenburg, A. Trovarelli, in: A. Trovarelli, P. Fornasiero eds, Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials, 2nd ed., Imperial College Press, London, 2013, 565-621.
[270]
K. Kochloefl, in: G. Ertl, H. Knözinger, J. Weitkamp eds.,, Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis, Vol. 4, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1997, 1831.
[271]
J. A. Sullivan, P. Dulgheru, I. Atribak, A. Bueno-Lopez, A. Garcia-Garcia, Appl. Catal. B, 2011, 108-109, 134-139.
[272]
B. M. Reddy, P. Bharali, G. Thrimurthulu, P. Saikia, L. Katta, S. E. Park, Catal. Lett., 2008, 123, 327-333. DOI:10.1007/s10562-008-9427-3
[273]
S. Liu, X. Wu, D. Weng, R. Ran, J. Rare Earths, 2015, 33, 567-590. DOI:10.1016/S1002-0721(14)60457-9
[274]
C. Lee, Y. Jeon, T. Kim, A. Tou, J. I. Park, H. Einaga, Y. G. Shul, Fuel, 2018, 212, 395-404. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.007
[275]
S. Bensaid, M. Piumetti, C. Novara, F. Giorgis, A. Chiodoni, N. Russo, D. Fino, Nanoscale Res. Lett., 2016, 11, 494-508. DOI:10.1186/s11671-016-1713-1
[276]
I. Atribak, A. Bueno-Lopez, A. Garcia-Garcia, Catal. Commun., 2008, 9, 250-255. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2007.05.047
[277]
E. Aneggi, D. Wiater, C. de Leitenburg, J. Llorca, A. Trovarelli, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 172-181. DOI:10.1021/cs400850r
[278]
J. Oi-Uchisawa, A. Obuchi, S. Wang, T. Nanba, A. Ohi, Appl. Catal. B-Environ, 2003, 43, 117-129. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00296-5
[279]
C. A. Neyertz, E. D. Banús, E. E. Miró, C. A. Querini, Chem. Eng. J., 2014, 248, 394-405. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.048
[280]
E. Aneggi, C. de Leitenburg, J. Llorca, A. Trovarelli, Catal. Today, 2012, 197, 119-126. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2012.07.030
[281]
E. D. Banús, V. G. Milt, E. E. Miró, M. A. Ulla, Appl. Catal. A, 2009, 362, 129-138. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2009.04.035
[282]
T. Andana, M. Piumetti, S. Bensaid, N. Russo, D. Fino, R. Pirone, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 11, 278.
[283]
M. Piumetti, S. Bensaid, N. Russo, D. Fino, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 180, 271-282. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.06.018
[284]
E. Aneggi, C. de Leitenburg, G. Dolcetti, A. Trovarelli, Catal. Today, 2006, 114, 40-47. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2006.02.008
[285]
L. Katta, P. Sudarsanam, G. Thrimurthulu, B. M. Reddy, Appl. Catal. B, 2010, 101, 101-108. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.09.012
[286]
I. Atribak, A. Bueno-López, A. García-García, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2009, 300, 103-110. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2008.10.043
[287]
Z. Gu, X. Sang, H. Wang, K. Li, J. Rare Earths, 2014, 32, 817-823. DOI:10.1016/S1002-0721(14)60147-2
[288]
Y. Wei, J. Liu, Z. Zhao, Y. Chen, C. Xu, A. Duan, G. Jiang, H. He, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 2326-2329. DOI:10.1002/anie.201006014
[289]
N. V. Zaletova, A. O. Turakulova, V. V. Lunin, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 2010, 175, 305-309. DOI:10.1016/S0167-2991(10)75048-5
[290]
J. Jr. Barbier, F. Delanoë, F. Jabouille, D. Duprez, G. Blanchard, P. Isnard, J. Catal., 1998, 177, 378-385. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1998.2113
[291]
M. Nishiumi, H. Miura, K. Wada, S. Hosokawa, M. Inoue, ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 1753-1759. DOI:10.1021/cs300151x
[292]
Y. Y. Gorbanev, S. Kegnæs, C. W. Hanning, T. W. Hansen, A. Riisager, ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 604-612. DOI:10.1021/cs200554h
[293]
S. Aouad, E. Abi-Aad, A. AboukaÏs, Appl. Catal. B, 2009, 88, 249-256. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.10.002
[294]
L. Nascimento, R. Martins, R. Silva, P. de Sousa Filho, O. Serra, React. Kinet. Mech. Catal., 2014, 111, 149-165. DOI:10.1007/s11144-013-0636-4
[295]
X. Deng, M. Li, J. Zhang, X. Hu, J. Zheng, N. Zhang, B. H. Chen, Chem. Eng. J., 2017, 313, 544-555. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.088
[296]
Q. Liang, X. Wu, D. Weng, Z. Lu, Catal. Commun., 2008, 9, 202-206. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2007.06.007
[297]
K. N. Rao, P. Venkataswamy, B. M. Reddy, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2011, 50, 11960-11969. DOI:10.1021/ie201474p
[298]
Y. H. Zhang, H. L. Zhang, Y. Cao, Y. Yang, B. Q. Xu, M. Zhao, M. C. Gong, H. D. Xu, Y. Q. Chen, Chem. Pap., 2016, 70, 1370-1379.
[299]
B. M. Reddy, K. N. Rao, Catal. Commun., 2009, 10, 1350-1353. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2009.02.020
[300]
V. S. Escribano, E. F. López, J. M. Gallardo-Amores, C. del Hoyo Martínez, C. Pistarino, M. Panizza, C. Resini, G. Busca, Combust. Flame, 2008, 153, 97-104. DOI:10.1016/j.combustflame.2007.11.010
[301]
A. Alinezhadchamazketi, A. A. Khodadadi, Y. Mortazavi, A. Nemati, J. Environ. Sci., 2013, 25, 2498-2506. DOI:10.1016/S1001-0742(12)60334-9
[302]
M. Peralta, V. Milt, L. Cornaglia, C. Querini, J. Catal., 2006, 242, 118-130. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2006.05.025
[303]
E. Miró, F. Ravelli, M. Ulla, L. Cornaglia, C. Querini, Catal. Today, 1999, 53, 631-638. DOI:10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00151-0
[304]
L. Zhu, X. Wang, React. Kinet. Mech. Catal., 2014, 112, 383-395. DOI:10.1007/s11144-014-0705-3
[305]
X. Wu, D. Liu, K. Li, J. Li, D. Weng, Catal. Commun., 2007, 8, 1274-1278. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2006.11.022
[306]
R. Matarrese, E. Aneggi, L. Castoldi, J. Llorca, A. Trovarelli, L. Lietti, Catal. Today, 2016, 267, 119-129. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2015.12.016
[307]
A. Bueno-López, K. Krishna, M. Makkee, J. Moulijn, J. Catal., 2005, 230, 237-248. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2004.11.027
[308]
J. A. Moulijn, F. Kapteijn, Carbon, 1995, 33, 1155-1165. DOI:10.1016/0008-6223(95)00070-T
[309]
J. Phillips, VIGYAN, Inc., Vienna, VA, 1995.
[310]
M. A. Wojtowicz, F. P. Miknis, R. Grimes, W. W. Smith, M. A. Serio, J. Hazard. Mater., 2000, 74, 81-89. DOI:10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00200-9
[311]
F. E. Spokoyny, US Patent 6264905, 2001.
[312]
E. Ito, R. Hultermans, P. Lugt, M. Burgers, H. Van Bekkum, C. Van den Bleek, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 1995, 96, 661-673. DOI:10.1016/S0167-2991(06)81466-7
[313]
T. V. Johnson, SAE Technical paper, 2002-01-0285, 2002.
[314]
G. Olofsson, L. R. Wallenberg, A. Andersson, J. Catal., 2005, 230, 1-13. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2004.11.023
[315]
Z. Wang, Z. Qu, X. Quan, H. Wang, Appl. Catal. A, 2012, 411-412, 131-138.
[316]
Z. Wang, Z. Qu, R. Fan, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2015, 147, 24-31. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2015.04.006
[317]
Z. Qu, Z. Wang, X. Zhang, H. Wang, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2016, 6, 4491-4502. DOI:10.1039/C5CY02125A
[318]
S. Nassos, E. E. Svensson, M. Boutonnet, S. G. Jaras, Appl. Catal. B, 2007, 74, 92-102. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.01.015
[319]
W. Chen, Y. Ma, Z. Qu, Q. Liu, W. Huang, X. Hu, N. Yan, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2014, 48, 12199-12205. DOI:10.1021/es502369f
[320]
J. Breen, R. Burch, C. Hardacre, C. Hill, C. Rioche, J. Catal., 2007, 246, 1-9. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2006.11.017
[321]
S. Morin, J. Savarino, M. M. Frey, N. Yan, S. Bekki, J. W. Bottenheim, J. M. F. Martins, Science, 2008, 322, 730-732. DOI:10.1126/science.1161910
[322]
J. X. Liu, L. Wang, W. Y. Song, M. J. Zhao, J. Liu, H. Wang, Z. Zhao, C. M. Xu, Z. C. Duan, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2019, 7, 2811-2820. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06126
[323]
A. Schilt, E. J. Brook, T. K. Bauska, D. Baggenstos, H. Fischer, F. Joos, V. V. Petrenko, H. Schaefer, J. Schmitt, J. P. Severinghaus, R. Spahni, T. F. Stocker, Nature, 2014, 516, 234-237. DOI:10.1038/nature13971
[324]
A. M. Beale, F. Gao, I. Lezcano-Gonzalez, C. H. F. Peden, J. Szanyi, Chem. Rev., 2015, 44, 7371.
[325]
P. Granger, V. I. Parvulescu, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 3155-3207. DOI:10.1021/cr100168g
[326]
L. Wang, J. X. Liu, W. Y. Song, H. Wang, Y. Li, J. Liu, Z. Zhao, J. B. Tan, Z. C. Duan, J. L. Deng, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 366, 504-513. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.038
[327]
S. Cai, D. Zhang, L. Zhang, L. Huang, H. Li, R. Gao, L. Shi, J. Zhang, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 93-101. DOI:10.1039/C3CY00398A
[328]
Z. Si, D. Weng, X. Wu, J. Yang, B. Wang, Catal. Commun., 2010, 11, 1045-1048. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2010.05.011
[329]
Z. Si, D. Weng, X. Wu, Z. Ma, J. Ma, R. Ran, Catal. Today, 2013, 201, 122-130. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2012.05.001
[330]
Q. Jin, Y. Shen, S. Zhu, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2017, 487, 401-409. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.056
[331]
H. Xu, X. Feng, S. Liu, Y. Wang, M. Sun, J. Wang, Y. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 419, 697-707. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.055
[332]
H. D. Xu, S. Liu, Y. Wang, Q. J. Lin, C. L. Lin, L. Lan, Q. Wang, Y. Q. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 427, 656-669. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.166
[333]
X. Zhao, L. Huang, H. Li, H. Hu, X. Hu, L. Shi, D. Zhang, Appl. Catal. B-Environ, 2016, 183, 269-281. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.10.052
[334]
T. Baidya, A. Bernhard, M. Elsener, O. Kröcher, Top. Catal., 2013, 56, 23-28. DOI:10.1007/s11244-013-9923-6
[335]
F. Can, S. Berland, S. Royer, X. Courtois, D. Duprez, ACS Catal., 2013, 3, 1120-1132. DOI:10.1021/cs3008329
[336]
L. Lietti, Appl. Catal. B, 1996, 10, 281-297. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(97)80001-X
[337]
H. Xu, Y. Li, B. Xu, Y. Cao, X. Feng, M. Sun, M. Gong, Y. Chen, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2016, 36, 334-345. DOI:10.1016/j.jiec.2016.02.024
[338]
S. Ding, F. Liu, X. Shi, K. Liu, Z. Lian, L. Xie, H. He, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2015, 7, 9497-9506. DOI:10.1021/acsami.5b00636
[339]
Z. Liu, H. Su, J. Li, Y. Li, Catal. Commun., 2015, 65, 51-54. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2015.02.028
[340]
B. Shen, Y. Wang, F. Wang, T. Liu, Chem. Eng. J., 2014, 236, 171-180. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.085
[341]
X. Zhang, B. Shen, K. Wang, J. Chen, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2013, 19, 1272-1279. DOI:10.1016/j.jiec.2012.12.028
[342]
T. H. Vuong, J. Radnik, E. Kondratenko, M. Schneider, U. Armbruster, A. Brückner, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 197, 159-167. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.063
[343]
S. S. R. Putluru, A. Riisager, R. Fehrmann, Catal. Lett., 2009, 133, 370-375. DOI:10.1007/s10562-009-0176-8
[344]
Z. Ma, X. Wu, Z. Si, D. Weng, J. Ma, T. Xu, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 179, 380-394. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.05.038
[345]
S. Ding, F. Liu, X. Shi, H. He, Appl. Catal. B, 2016, 180, 766-774. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.06.055
[346]
J. Yu, Z. Si, L. Chen, X. Wu, D. Weng, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 163, 223-232. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.08.006
[347]
Z. Si, D. Weng, X. Wu, R. Ran, Z. Ma, Catal. Commun., 2012, 17, 146-149. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2011.09.018
[348]
H. Xu, M. Sun, S. Liu, Y. Li, J. Wang, Y. Chen, RSC Adv., 2017, 7, 24177-24187. DOI:10.1039/C7RA03054A
[349]
P. Ning, Z. Song, H. Li, Q. Zhang, X. Liu, J. Zhang, X. Tang, Z. Huang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 332, 130-137. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.01.118
[350]
X. Chen, X. Sun, C. Gong, G. Lv, C. Song, Front. Mater. Sci., 2016, 10, 211-223. DOI:10.1007/s11706-016-0331-2
[351]
W. Cai, Q. Zhong, D. Wang, Y. Zhao, M. Chen, Y. Bu, ACS Appl Nano Mater., 2018, 1, 1150-1163. DOI:10.1021/acsanm.7b00320
[352]
T. H. Vuong, J. Radnik, J. Rabeah, U. Bentrup, M. Schneider, H. Atia, U. Armbruster, W. Grünert, A. Brückner, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 1693-1705. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b03223
[353]
S. H. Jo, I. Lee, H. Park, H. Lee, Ceram. Int., 2017, 43, 5182-5188. DOI:10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.01.042
[354]
A. Väliheikki, K. C. Petallidou, C. M. Kalamaras, T. Kolli, M. Huuhtanen, T. Maunula, R. L. Keiski, A. M. Efstathiou, Appl. Catal. B, 2014, 156-157, 72-83.
[355]
Z. Peng, Z. Li, Y. Q. Liu, S. Yan, J. Tong, D. Wang, Y. Y. Ye, S. Li, Chem. Commun., 2017, 53, 5958-5961. DOI:10.1039/C7CC02235B
[356]
L. Liotta, A. Longo, A. Macaluso, A. Martorana, G. Pantaleo, A. Venezia, G. Deganello, Appl. Catal. B, 2004, 48, 133-149. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.10.001
[357]
C. M. Kalamaras, G. G. Olympiou, V. I. Pârvulescu, B. Cojocaru, A. M. Efstathiou, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 206, 308-318. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.052
[358]
R. Burch, P. J. Millington, A. Walker, Appl. Catal. B, 1994, 4, 65-94. DOI:10.1016/0926-3373(94)00014-X
[359]
M. D. Amiridis, T. Zhang, R. J. Farrauto, Appl. Catal. B, 1996, 10, 203-227. DOI:10.1016/0926-3373(96)00031-8
[360]
R. Burch, J. P. Breen, F. C. Meunier, Appl. Catal. B, 2002, 39, 283-303. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00118-2
[361]
Z. Hu, X. Liu, D. Meng, Y. Guo, Y. Guo, G. Lu, ACS Catal.,, 2016, 6, 2265-2279. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.5b02617
[362]
R. Burch, A. Ramli, Appl. Catal. B, 1998, 15, 49-62. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(97)00036-2
[363]
Y. Li, J. N. Armor, Appl. Catal. B, 1993, 2, 239-256. DOI:10.1016/0926-3373(93)80051-E
[364]
K. Shimizu, F. Okada, Y. Nakamura, A. Satsuma, T. Hattori, J. Catal., 2000, 195, 151-160. DOI:10.1006/jcat.2000.2964
[365]
T. J. Lee, I. S. Nam, S. W. Ham, Y. S. Baek, K. H. Shin, Appl. Catal. B, 2003, 41, 115-127. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(02)00197-2
[366]
M. Pirez-Engelmann, P. Granger, L. Leclercq, G. Leclercq, Top. Catal., 2004, 30-31, 59-64.
[367]
B. Azambre, L. Zenboury, P. Da Costa, S. Capela, S. Carpentier, A. Westermann, Catal. Today, 2011, 176, 242-249. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2010.12.026
[368]
L. Zenboury, B. Azambre, J. Weber, Catal. Today, 2008, 137, 167-173. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2007.12.136
[369]
C. Thomas, O. Gorce, C. Fontaine, J.-M. Krafft, F. Villain, G. Djéga-Mariadassou, Appl. Catal. B, 2006, 63, 201-214. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.09.010
[370]
M. Haneda, K. Shinoda, A. Nagane, O. Houshito, H. Takagi, Y. Nakahara, K. Hiroe, T. Fujitani, H. Hamada, J. Catal., 2008, 259, 223-231. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2008.08.007
[371]
C. Thomas, O. Gorce, F. Villain, G. Djéga-Mariadassou, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2006, 249, 71-79. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2006.01.001
[372]
N. A. S. Amin, C. M. Chong, Chem. Eng. J., 2005, 113, 13-25. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2005.08.001
[373]
M. Adamowska, S. Muller, P. Da Costa, A. Krzton, P. Burg, Appl. Catal. B, 2007, 74, 278-289. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.02.018
[374]
M. Adamowska, A. Krztoń, M. Najbar, J. Camra, G. Djéga-Mariadassou, P. Da Costa, Appl. Catal. B, 2009, 90, 535-544. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.04.018
[375]
T. Tanabe, Y. Nagai, K. Dohmae, N. Takagi, N. Takahashi, H. Shinjoh, Appl. Catal. B, 2011, 105, 41-49. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.03.033
[376]
O. Gorce, F. Baudin, C. Thomas, P. Da Costa, G. Djéga-Mariadassou, Appl. Catal. B, 2004, 54, 69-84. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.05.022
[377]
M. Adamowska-Teyssier, A. Krzton, P. Da Costa, G. Djega-Mariadassou, Fuel, 2015, 150, 21-28. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.01.017
[378]
M. Adamowska, A. Krzton, M. Najbar, P. Costa Da, G. Djega-Mariadassou, Catal. Today, 2008, 137, 288-291. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2008.01.013
[379]
G. Djéga-Mariadassou, M. Berger, O. Gorce, J. W. Park, H. Pernot, C. Potvin, C. Thomas, P. Da Costa, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 2007, 171, 145-173. DOI:10.1016/S0167-2991(07)80206-0
[380]
R. Strobel, F. Krumeich, S. E. Pratsinis, A. Baiker, J. Catal., 2006, 243, 229-238. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2006.07.016
[381]
C. M. Kalamaras, G. G. Olympiou, V. I. Parvulescu, B. Cojocaru, A. M. Efstathiou, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 206, 308-318. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.052
[382]
G. Djéga-Mariadassou, Catal. Today, 2004, 90, 27-34. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2004.04.004
[383]
M. A. Gómez-García, S. Libs, P. Bernhardt, V. Pitchon, A. Kiennemann, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2007, 46, 7045-7049. DOI:10.1021/ie0706358
[384]
A. Westermann, B. Azambre, Catal. Today, 2011, 176, 441-448. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2010.10.071
[385]
A. Westermann, B. Azambre, A. Koch, Catal. Today, 2012, 191, 65-74. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2011.12.030
[386]
F. Baudin, P. Da Costa, C. Thomas, S. Calvo, Y. Lendresse, S. Schneider, F. Delacroix, G. Plassat, G. Djéga-Mariadassoua, Top. Catal., 2004, 30-31, 97-101.
[387]
M. S. Li, K. Seshan, L. Lefferts, Appl. Catal. B, 2004, 50, 143-151. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.01.001
[388]
X. Q. Wang, S. A. Sigmon, J. J. Spivey, H. H. Lamb, Catal. Today, 2004, 96, 11-20. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2004.05.003
[389]
H. Iwakuni, Y. Shinmyou, H. Yano, H. Matsumoto, T. Ishihara, Appl. Catal. B, 2007, 74, 299-306. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.02.020
[390]
C. Tofan, D. Klvana, J. Kirchnerova, Appl. Catal. B, 2002, 36, 311-323. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(01)00312-5
[391]
H. J. Hwang, M. Awano, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2001, 21, 2103-2107. DOI:10.1016/S0955-2219(01)00181-9
[392]
Z. Zhao, X. Yang, Y. Wu, Appl. Catal. B, 1996, 8, 281-297. DOI:10.1016/0926-3373(95)00067-4
[393]
Y. Zhu, D. Wang, F. Yuan, G. Zhang, H. Fu, Appl. Catal. B, 2008, 82, 255-263. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.01.025
[394]
Z. Liu, J. Hao, L. Fu, T. Zhu, Appl. Catal. B, 2003, 44, 355-370. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(03)00103-6
[395]
J. Zawadzki, M. Wiśniewski, Carbon, 2002, 40, 119-124. DOI:10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00081-1
[396]
K. Almusaiteer, R. Krishnamurthy, S. Chuang, Catal. Today, 2000, 55, 291-299. DOI:10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00242-4
[397]
J. Zhu, Y. Wei, W. Chen, Z. Zhao, A. Thomas, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 6965-6967. DOI:10.1039/c0cc01432j
[398]
M. Y. Kustova, S. B. Rasmussen, A. L. Kustov, C. H. Christensen, Appl. Catal. B, 2006, 67, 60-67. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.04.014
[399]
L. D. Li, Q. Shen, J. J. Yu, Z. P. Hao, Z. P. Xu, G. Q. Lu Max, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2007, 41, 7901-7906. DOI:10.1021/es071779g
[400]
B. M. Abu-Zied, W. Schwieger, A. Unger, Appl. Catal. B, 2008, 84, 277-288. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.04.004
[401]
P. K. Sajith, Y. Shiota, K. Yoshizawa, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 2075-2085. DOI:10.1021/cs500223z
[402]
W. Xu, J. Zhou, Z. You, Y. Luo, Y. Ou, ChemCatchem, 2015, 7, 450-458. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201402852
[403]
K. M. Valkaj, V. Tomasic, A. Katovic, E. Bielanska, Mater. Sci. Poland, 2016, 34, 177-184. DOI:10.1515/msp-2016-0018
[404]
T. Ohnishi, K. Kawakami, M. Nishioka, M. Ogura, Catal. Today, 2017, 281, 566-574. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2016.07.012
[405]
[406]
P. F. Yang, J. C. Zhou, Z. Wang, Adv. Mater. Res., 2010, 113-116, 1735-1739.
[407]
B. A. Hungate, J. S. Dukes, M. R. Shaw, Y. Luo, C. B. Field, Science, 2003, 302, 1512-1513. DOI:10.1126/science.1091390
[408]
L. Li, J. Xu, J. Hu, J. Han, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2014, 48, 5290-5297. DOI:10.1021/es404728s
[409]
[410]
J. W. Erisman, J. Galloway, S. Seitzinger, A. Bleeker, K. Butterbach-Bahl, Curr. Opin. Enviro. Sustain., 2011, 3, 281-290. DOI:10.1016/j.cosust.2011.08.012
[411]
S. Imamura, R. Hamada, Y. Saito, K. Hashimoto, H. Jindai, J. Mol. Catal. A, 1999, 139, 55-62. DOI:10.1016/S1381-1169(98)00188-5
[412]
J. Novakova, Appl. Catal. B, 2001, 30, 445-457. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(00)00260-5
[413]
A. Gupta, A. Kumar, U. V. Waghmare, M. S. Hegde, Chem. Mater., 2009, 21, 4880-4891. DOI:10.1021/cm901906e
[414]
M. Haneda, H. Hamada, J. Catal., 2010, 273, 39-49. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2010.04.021
[415]
X. Wang, N. Maeda, A. Baiker, ACS Catal., 2016, 6, 7898-7906. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b02401
[416]
L. Liu, B. Liu, L. Dong, J. Zhu, H. Wan, K. Sun, B. Zhao, H. Zhu, L. Dong, Y. Chen, Appl. Catal. B, 2009, 90, 578-586. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.04.019
[417]
G. R. Rao, P. Fornasiero, R. Di Monte, J. Kašpar, G. Vlaic, G. Balducci, S. Meriani, G. Gubitosa, A. Cremona, M. Graziani, J. Catal., 1996, 162, 1-9. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1996.0254
[418]
H. O. Zhu, J. R. Kim, S. K. Ihm, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 2009, 97, 207-215. DOI:10.1007/s11144-009-0049-6
[419]
J. R. Regalbuto, E. E. Wolf, J. Catal., 1988, 109, 12-24. DOI:10.1016/0021-9517(88)90180-7
[420]
L. F. Chen, G. Gonzalez, J. A. Wang, L. E. Norena, A. Toledo, S. Castillo, M. Moran-Pineda, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2005, 243, 319-328. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.09.074
[421]
A. Martınez-Arias, M. Fernández-Garcıa, A. Iglesias-Juez, A. Hungrıa, J. Anderson, J. Conesa, J. Soria, Appl. Catal. B, 2001, 31, 51-60. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(00)00264-2
[422]
M. Fernández-Garcıa, A. Martınez-Arias, A. Iglesias-Juez, A. Hungrıa, J. A. Anderson, J. C. Conesa, J. Soria, J. Catal., 2003, 214, 220-233. DOI:10.1016/S0021-9517(02)00145-8
[423]
A. B. Hungría, M. Fernández-García, J. A. Anderson, A. Martínez-Arias, J. Catal., 2005, 235, 262-271. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2005.08.012
[424]
J. R. Kim, W. J. Myeong, S. K. Ihm, J. Catal., 2009, 263, 123-133. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2009.02.001
[425]
R. Zhang, W. Y. Teoh, R. Amal, B. Chen, S. Kaliaguine, J. Catal., 2010, 272, 210-219. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2010.04.001
[426]
Q. Yu, L. Liu, L. Dong, D. Li, B. Liu, F. Gao, K. Sun, L. Dong, Y. Chen, Appl. Catal. B, 2010, 96, 350-360. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.02.032
[427]
L. Liu, Z. Yao, B. Liu, L. Dong, J. Catal., 2010, 275, 45-60. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2010.07.024
[428]
L. Liu, Y. Chen, L. Dong, J. Zhu, H. Wan, B. Liu, B. Zhao, H. Zhu, K. Sun, L. Dong, Y. Chen, Appl. Catal. B, 2009, 90, 105-114. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.02.021
[429]
L. Liu, Q. Yu, J. Zhu, H. Wan, K. Sun, B. Liu, H. Zhu, F. Gao, L. Dong, Y. Chen, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2010, 349, 246-255. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2010.05.044
[430]
R. Zhang, H. Alamdari, S. Kaliaguine, J. Catal., 2006, 242, 241-253. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2006.05.033
[431]
F. Solymosi, T. Bansagi, J. Catal., 2001, 202, 205-206. DOI:10.1006/jcat.2001.3258
[432]
W. C. Hecker, A. T. Bell, J. Catal., 1984, 85, 389-397. DOI:10.1016/0021-9517(84)90228-8
[433]
R. H. H. Smits, Y. Iwasawa, Appl. Catal. B, 1995, 6, L201-L207. DOI:10.1016/0926-3373(95)00028-3
[434]
V. I. Pârvulescu, P. Grange, B. Delmon, Catal. Today, 1998, 46, 233-316. DOI:10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00399-X
[435]
K. Yoshida, S. Makino, S. Sumiya, G. Muramatsu, R. Helferich, SAE Technical Paper, 892046, 1989.
[436]
J. Oi-Uchisawa, S. Wang, T. Nanba, A. Ohi, A. Obuchi, Appl. Catal. B, 2003, 44, 207-215. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(03)00055-9
[437]
A. Datta, H. I. Khwaja, R. Y. Kelkar, A. R. Saple, M. Datta, Chem. Commun., 1996, 851-852.
[438]
B. S. Sanchez, C. A. Querini, E. E. Miro, Appl. Catal. A, 2009, 366, 166-175. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2009.07.009
[439]
R. Matarrese, S. Morandi, L. Castoldi, P. Villa, L. Lietti, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 201, 318-330. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.07.013
[440]
G. Mul, F. Kapteijn, C. Doornkamp, J. A. Moulijn, J. Catal., 1998, 179, 258-266. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1998.2201
[441]
L. Castoldi, R. Matarrese, L. Lietti, P. Forzatti, Appl. Catal. B, 2009, 90, 278-285. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.03.022
[442]
J. Liu, Z. Zhao, C. Xu, A. Duan, Appl. Catal. B, 2008, 78, 61-72. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.09.001
[443]
J. Liu, Z. Zhao, C. Xu, A. Duan, G. Jiang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 5930-5941.
[444]
Y. Wu, T. Yu, B. S. Dou, C. X. Wang, X. F. Xie, Z. L. Yu, S. R. Fan, Z. R. Fan, L. C. Wang, J. Catal., 1989, 120, 88-107. DOI:10.1016/0021-9517(89)90253-4
[445]
Z. Li, M. Meng, Q. Li, Y. Xie, T. Hu, J. Zhang, Chem. Eng. J., 2010, 164, 98-105. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2010.08.036
[446]
J. Xu, J. Liu, Z. Zhao, C. Xu, J. Zheng, A. Duan, G. Jiang, J. Catal., 2011, 282, 1-12. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2011.03.024
[447]
S. B. Simonsen, S. Dahl, E. Johnson, S. Helveg, J. Catal., 2008, 255, 1-5. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2008.01.004
[448]
K. Krishna, A. Bueno-López, M. Makkee, J. A. Moulijn, Appl. Catal. B, 2007, 75, 189-200. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.04.010
[449]
I. Atribak, A. Bueno-Lopez, A. Garcia-Garcia, Top. Catal., 2009, 52, 2088-2091. DOI:10.1007/s11244-009-9388-9
[450]
N. Guillen-Hurtado, A. Bueno-Lopez, A. Garcia-Garcia, Appl. Catal. A, 2012, 437-438, 166-172.
[451]
P. Dulgheru, J. A. Sullivan, Top. Catal., 2013, 56, 504-510. DOI:10.1007/s11244-013-0006-5
[452]
A. M. Hernandez-Gimenez, L. P. dos Santos Xavier, A. Bueno-Lopez, Appl. Catal. A, 2013, 462-463, 100-106.
[453]
K. C. Taylor, in: J. R. Anderson, M. Boudart, eds, Catalysis: Science and Technology, Vol. 5 Springer-verlag, Berlin, 1984, 5, 119-170
[454]
P. Fornasiero, R. Di Monte, G. R. Rao, J. Kaspar, S. Meriani, A. Trovarelli, M. Graziani, J. Catal., 1995, 151, 168-177. DOI:10.1006/jcat.1995.1019
[455]
Z. Zhang, Y. Fan, Y. Xin, Q. Li, R. Li, J. A. Anderson, Z. Zhang, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2015, 49, 7989-7995. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.5b01361
[456]
C. E. Hori, H. Permana, K. Y. Si. Ng, A. Brenner, K. More, K. M. Rahmoeller, D. Belton, Appl. Catal. B, 1998, 16, 105-117. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(97)00060-X
[457]
M. Zhao, M. Shen, J. Wang, J. Catal., 2007, 248, 258-267. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2007.03.005
[458]
H. He, H. X. Dai, L. H. Ng, K. W. Wong, C. T. Au, J. Catal., 2002, 206, 1-13. DOI:10.1006/jcat.2001.3466
[459]
P. S. Lambrou, C. N. Costa, S. Y. Christou, A. M. Efstathiou, Appl. Catal. B, 2004, 54, 237-250. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.018
[460]
L. Lan, S. Chen, Y. Cao, M. Zhao, M. Gong, Y. Chen, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2015, 450, 404-416. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2015.03.042
[461]
Y. Zhou, J. Deng, L. Lan, J. Wang, S. Yuan, M. Gong, Y. Chen, J. Mater. Sci., 2017, 52, 5894-5907. DOI:10.1007/s10853-017-0825-z
[462]
A. Papavasiliou, A. Tsetsekou, V. Matsouka, M. Konsolakis, I. V. Yentekakis, N. Boukos, Appl. Catal. B, 2009, 90, 162-174. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.03.006
[463]
T. Masui, T. Ozaki, K. Machida, G. Adachi, J. Alloys Compd., 2000, 303-304, 49-55.
[464]
T. Nakatani, T. Wakita, R. Ota, K. Tanaka, T. Wakasugi, J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn., 2003, 111, 137-141. DOI:10.2109/jcersj.111.137
[465]
L. Lan, S. H. Chen, H. M. Li, H. M. Li, W. X. Wu, J. Deng, Y. Q. Chen, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2018, 58, 246-257. DOI:10.1016/j.jiec.2017.09.034
[466]
H. M. Li, L. Lan, S. H. Chen, D. Y. Liu, W. Wang, Y. Q. Chen, J. Inorg. Mater., 2018, 33, 798-804. DOI:10.15541/jim20170387
[467]
B. Zhao, Q. Wang, G. Li, R. Zhou, J. Alloys Compd., 2010, 508, 500-506. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.08.101
[468]
L. Lan, S. Chen, M. Zhao, M. Gong, Y. Chen, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2014, 394, 10-21. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2014.06.032
[469]
R. Si, Y. W. Zhang, S. J. Li, B. X. Lin, C. H. Yan, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2004, 108, 12481-12488. DOI:10.1021/jp048084b
[470]
S. Lin, L. Yang, X. Yang, R. Zhou, Chem. Eng. J., 2014, 247, 42-49. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.015
[471]
B. Zhao, G. Li, C. Ge, Q. Wang, R. Zhou, Appl. Catal. B, 2010, 96, 338-349. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.02.031
[472]
L. F. Liotta, A. Macaluso, A. Longo, G. Pantaleo, A. Martorana, G. Deganello, Appl. Catal. A, 2003, 240, 295-307. DOI:10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00460-X
[473]
B. Zhao, C. Yang, Q. Wang, G. Li, R. Zhou, J. Alloys Compd., 2010, 494, 340-346. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.01.031
[474]
R. Daley, S. Christou, A. Efstathiou, J. Anderson, Appl. Catal. B-Environ, 2005, 60, 117-127. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.03.002
[475]
J. R. Gonzalez-Velasco, M. A. Gutierrez-Ortiz, J. L. Marc, M. P. Gonzalez-Marcos, G. Blanchard, Appl. Catal. B, 2001, 33, 303-314. DOI:10.1016/S0926-3373(01)00184-9
[476]
J. Kaspar, P. Fornasiero, N. Hickey, Catal. Today, 2003, 77, 419-449. DOI:10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00384-X
[477]
R. J. Farrauto, R. M. Heck, Catal. Today, 1999, 51, 351-360. DOI:10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00024-3
[478]
L. Lan, S. Chen, Y. Cao, S. Wang, Q. Wu, Y. Zhou, M. Huang, M. Gong, Y. Chen, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2015, 410, 100-109. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2015.09.016
[479]
J. Wang, M. Shen, Y. An, J. Wang, Catal. Commun., 2008, 10, 103-107. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2008.08.004
[480]
L. Yang, X. Yang, R. Zhou, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120, 2712-2723.
[481]
L. Yang, X. Yang, S. Lin, R. Zhou, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, 5, 2688-2695. DOI:10.1039/C5CY00117J
[482]
M. Shen, J. Wang, J. Shang, Y. An, J. Wang, W. Wang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 1543-1551. DOI:10.1021/jp808962r
[483]
J. Guo, Z. Shi, D. Wu, H. Yin, M. Gong, Y. Chen, Mater. Res. Bull., 2013, 48, 495-503. DOI:10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.11.006
[484]
[485]
Q. Wang, G. Li, B. Zhao, M. Shen, R. Zhou, Appl. Catal. B, 2010, 101, 150-159. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.09.026
[486]
Q. Wang, G. Li, B. Zhao, R. Zhou, Appl. Catal. B, 2010, 100, 516-528. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.09.004
[487]
A. Papavasiliou, A. Tsetsekou, V. Matsouka, M. Konsolakis, I. V. Yentekakis, Appl. Catal. A, 2010, 382, 73-84. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2010.04.025
[488]
J. Guo, Z. Shi, D. Wu, H. Yin, M. Gong, Y. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2013, 273, 527-535. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.074
[489]
Q. Wang, G. Li, B. Zhao, R. Zhou, Fuel, 2011, 90, 3047-3055. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2011.05.029
[490]
X. Yang, L. Yang, S. Lin, R. Zhou, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2015, 119, 6065-6074.
[491]
Q. Wang, G. Li, B. Zhao, R. Zhou, J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, 189, 150-157. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.02.012
[492]
L. P. dos Santos Xavier, V. Rico-Perez, A. M. Hernandez-Gimenez, D. Lozano-Castello, A. Bueno-Lopez, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 162, 412-419. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.07.013
[493]
J. Guo, Z. Shi, D. Wu, H. Yin, M. Gong, Y. Chen, J. Alloys Compd.,, 2015, 621, 104-115. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.09.189
[494]
Q. Wang, G. Li, B. Zhao, R. Zhou, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2011, 339, 52-60. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2011.02.011
[495]
Q. Wang, B. Zhao, G. Li, R. Zhou, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2010, 44, 3870-3875. DOI:10.1021/es903957e
[496]
G. Li, Q. Wang, B. Zhao, M. Shen, R. Zhou, J. Hazard. Mater., 2011, 186, 911-920. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.080
[497]
G. Li, Q. Wang, B. Zhao, R. Zhou, J. Mol. Catal. A, 2010, 326, 69-74. DOI:10.1016/j.molcata.2010.04.008
[498]
G. Li, B. Zhao, Q. Wang, R. Zhou, Appl. Catal. B, 2010, 97, 41-48. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.03.022
[499]
G. Li, Q. Wang, B. Zhao, R. Zhou, Catal. Today, 2011, 175, 40-47. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2011.04.043
[500]
G. Li, Q. Wang, B. Zhao, R. Zhou, Appl. Catal. B, 2011, 105, 151-162. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.04.006
[501]
G. Li, Q. Wang, B. Zhao, R. Zhou, Fuel, 2012, 92, 360-368. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2011.07.028
[502]
G. Li, Q. Wang, B. Zhao, R. Zhou, Catal. Today, 2010, 158, 385-392. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2010.05.001
[503]
H. F. Wang, H. Y. Li, X. Q. Gong, Y. L. Guo, G. Z. Lu, P. Hu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14, 16521-16535. DOI:10.1039/c2cp42220d
[504]
E. Aneggi, C. de Leitenburg, A. Trovarelli, Catal. Today, 2012, 181, 108-115. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2011.05.034
[505]
H. F. Wang, X. Q. Gong, Y. L. Guo, Y. Guo, G. Z. Lu, P. Hu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113, 10229-10232. DOI:10.1021/jp900942a
[506]
L. Lan, S. Chen, Y. Cao, M. Gong, Y. Chen, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, 5, 4488-4500. DOI:10.1039/C5CY00612K
[507]
T. Hou, B. Yu, S. Zhang, J. Zhang, D. Wang, T. Xu, L. Cui, W. Cai, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 168-169, 524-530.
[508]
W. Wang, J. Gong, Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2010, 5, 2-10.
[509]
F. Ocampo, B. Louis, L. Kiwi-Minsker, A. C. Roger, Appl. Catal. A, 2011, 392, 36-44. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2010.10.025
[510]
F. Ocampo, B. Louis, A. C. Roger, Appl. Catal. A,, 2009, 369, 90-96. DOI:10.1016/j.apcata.2009.09.005
[511]
J. Ashok, M. L. Ang, S. Kawi, Catal. Today, 2017, 281, 304-311. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2016.07.020
[512]
X. Shang, D. Deng, X. Wang, W. Xuan, X. Zou, W. Ding, X. Lu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43, 7179-7189. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.059
[513]
H. W. Zhu, R. Razzaq, C. S. Li, Y. Muhmmad, S. J. Zhang, AIChE J., 2013, 59, 2567-2576. DOI:10.1002/aic.14026
[514]
P. Kumar, Y. Sun, R. O. Idem, Energy Fuels, 2007, 21, 3113-3123. DOI:10.1021/ef7002409
[515]
W. Yuan, Y. Wang, Y. Zou, W. Tan, W. Hou, L. Zheng, F. Wu, L. Zhou, Catal. Lett., 2016, 146, 1663-1673. DOI:10.1007/s10562-016-1791-9
[516]
X. Chang, B. Liu, H. Xia, R. Amin, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 442, 342-351. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.068
[517]
E. C. Faria, R. C. R. Neto, R. C. Colman, F. B. Noronha, Catal. Today, 2014, 228, 138-144. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2013.10.058
[518]
A. Khan, T. Sukonket, B. Saha, R. Idem, Energy Fuels, 2012, 26, 365-379. DOI:10.1021/ef2013562
[519]
W. J. Jang, D. W. Jeong, J. O. Shim, H. S. Roh, I. H. Son, S. J. Lee, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38, 4508-4512. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.196
[520]
B. Koubaissy, A. Pietraszek, A. C. Roger, A. Kiennemann, Catal. Today, 2010, 157, 436-439. DOI:10.1016/j.cattod.2010.01.050
[521]
F. B. Noronha, E. C. Fendley, R. R. Soares, W. E. Alvarez, D. E. Resasco, Chem. Eng. J., 2001, 82, 21-31. DOI:10.1016/S1385-8947(00)00368-5
[522]
E. Akpan, Y. Sun, P. Kumar, H. Ibrahim, A. Aboudheir, R. Idem, Chem. Eng. Sci., 2007, 62, 4012-4024. DOI:10.1016/j.ces.2007.04.044
[523]
M. Mikkelsen, M. JØrgensen, F. C. Krebs, Environ. Energy, Energy Environ., 2010, 3, 43-81. DOI:10.1039/B912904A
[524]
K. Tomishige, Y. Furusawa, Y. Ikeda, M. Asadullah, K. Fujimoto, Catal. Lett., 2001, 76, 71-74. DOI:10.1023/A:1016711722721
[525]
A. H. Tamboli, A. A. Chaugule, S. W. Gosavi, H. Kim, Fuel, 2018, 216, 245-254. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.008
[526]
Z. F. Zhang, Z. T. Liu, Z. W. Liu, J. Lu, Catal. Lett., 2009, 129, 428-436. DOI:10.1007/s10562-008-9816-7
[527]
P. Kumar, P. With, V. C. Srivastava, K. Shukla, R. Glaser, I. M. Mishra, RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 110235-110246. DOI:10.1039/C6RA22643D
[528]
R. Saada, S. Kellici, T. Heil, D. Morgan, B. Saha, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 2015, 168-169, 353-362.
[529]
H. J. Lee, S. Park, I. K. Song, J. C. Jung, Catal. Lett., 2011, 141, 531-537. DOI:10.1007/s10562-010-0544-4
[530]
H. J. Lee, S. Park, J. C. Jung, I. K. Song, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 2011, 28, 1518-1522. DOI:10.1007/s11814-011-0020-x
[531]
Z. F. Zhang, Z. W. Liu, J. A. Lu, Z. T. Lie, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2011, 50, 1981-1988. DOI:10.1021/ie102017j
[532]
P. Kumar, P. With, V. C. Srivastava, R. Glaser, I. M. Mishra, J. Alloys Compd., 2017, 696, 718-726. DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.293
[533]
K. Almusaiteer, Catal. Commun., 2009, 10, 1127-1131. DOI:10.1016/j.catcom.2009.01.012
[534]
R. Renner, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2001, 35, 138A-139A. DOI:10.1021/es012312n
[535]
P. T. Anastas, L. B. Bartlett, M. M. Kirchhoff, T. C. Williamson, Catal. Today, 2000, 55, 11-22. DOI:10.1016/S0920-5861(99)00222-9
[536]
Y. Fan, Z. Wang, Y. Xin, Q. Li, Z. Zhang, Y. Wang, Mol. Phys., 2014, 9, e88236.
[537]
[538]
J. Tang, Z. Zou, J. Ye, Chem. Mater., 2004, 16, 1644-1649. DOI:10.1021/cm0353815