催化学报  2019, Vol. 40 Issue (10): 1499-1504      DOI: S1872-2067(19)63423-6   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Linquan Bao
Chengcheng Zhao
Shenggang Li
Yan Zhu
Benzalaniline from nitrobenzene and benzaldehyde catalyzed efficiently by an atomically precise palladium nanocluster
Linquan Baoa, Chengcheng Zhaob, Shenggang Lib, Yan Zhua     
a. Key Laboratory of Mesoscopic Chemistry, MOE, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, China;
b. Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201210, China
* Corresponding author. Shenggang Li, E-mail: lisg@sari.ac.cn;
Yan Zhu, E-mail: zhuyan@nju.edu.cn
We acknowledge financial supports from National Natural Science Foundation of China (21773109, 91845104)
Abstract: Nanoclusters with a precise number of atoms may exhibit unique and often unexpected catalytic properties. Here, we report an atomically precise Pd3 nanocluster as an efficient catalyst, whose catalytic performance differs remarkably from typical Pd nanoparticle catalysts, with excellent reactivity and selectivity in the one-pot synthesis of benzalaniline from nitrobenzene and benzaldehyde. We anticipate that our work will serve as a starting point for the catalytic applications of these tiny atomically precise nanoclusters in green chemistry for the one-pot syntheses of fine chemicals.
© 2019, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Nanoclusters    Palladium    Reductive amidation    Selectivity    Activity    
原子精度的钯原子簇催化硝基苯和苯甲醛反应制备苯甲酰胺
包琳泉a, 赵成成b, 李圣刚b, 祝艳a     
a. 南京大学化学化工学院, 介观化学教育部重点实验室, 江苏南京 210093;
b. 中国科学院上海高等研究院, 低碳转化科学与工程中心, 上海 201210
摘要:金属纳米颗粒催化剂在现代化学工业及相关催化领域研究中具有至关重要的地位,然而常规纳米颗粒催化剂的一个主要问题是尺寸多分散,导致难以在原子水平上精确控制其活性物种结构,从而阻碍在原子水平上建立精准的催化剂结构与性能之间的对应关系.因此,人们极需构筑和研究新型具有原子精度的催化材料.具有确定原子数目和精确结构的金属原子簇往往呈现出类似于分子的行为和特殊的电子结构,是一种介于均相与多相之间的结构精准的新型催化剂,其催化性能能够从原子水平上真正反映催化剂结构的影响,提供催化作用本质的清晰信息,对理解催化剂构效关系有重要意义,可以解决常规催化剂所面临的一些难题.本文报道了一种原子精度的Pd3原子簇催化剂,它在催化硝基苯和苯甲醛一锅法合成苄叉苯胺的反应中表现出比常规的Pd纳米颗粒催化剂更优异的性能.Pd3原子簇催化剂可以高效地把硝基苯和苯甲醛转化为部分氢化产物(苄叉苯胺),而Pd纳米颗粒催化此反应得到完全氢化的产物(苄基苯胺).实验研究表明,苄叉苯胺更容易从Pd3原子簇催化剂表面脱附,从而抑制了苄叉苯胺的进一步加氢,并提高了Pd3原子簇催化剂对苄叉苯胺的选择性.密度泛函计算进一步证实了苄叉苯胺与Pd3原子簇的相互作用比较弱,苄叉苯胺更容易从Pd3原子簇上脱附,从而避免了其进一步加氢生成苄基苯胺,这与Pd纳米颗粒表面的催化性质截然不同.综上所述,我们报道了一种高效且易于回收的Pd3原子簇催化剂,并将其用于催化硝基苯和苯甲醛一锅法高效合成苯甲酰苯胺.Pd3原子簇对此反应表现出了极高的反应活性并对部分氢化产物苄叉苯胺有极高的选择性,而Pd纳米颗粒催化剂则更加有利于生成完全加氢产物苄基苯胺.基于实验和理论计算研究,我们确认了两种催化剂上反应物的吸附和反应的不同特性是导致其不同催化行为的主要原因.
关键词原子簇        还原酰胺化    选择性    活性    

Metal nanoparticles are the active catalysts for the majority of current chemical processes [1, 2]. However, conventional nanoparticle catalysts have several major issues, particularly the inherent size polydispersity, and the difficulty in precisely controlling the structure at the atomic level [3]. These major limitations preclude fundamental investigations on the precise structure-activity relationships, e.g., it is usually impossible to unambiguously identify the catalytically active species in nanoparticle catalysis [4-6]. The majority of current studies offer an ensemble average of the catalytic performance due to the structural polydispersity and heterogeneity of conventional nanoparticle catalysts. Although significant efforts have been invested in preparing well-defined nanoparticles as model catalysts, fundamental catalysis research still lags behind [7]. Therefore, generalizing the synthesis of atomically precise metal nanoclusters and using them as well-defined catalysts are of paramount importance. Atomically monodisperse nanoclusters are composed of an exact number of metal atoms, and thus differ from the respective metal nanoparticles [8-11]. More importantly, based on their atom packing structures and unique electronic properties, these nanoclusters permit the precise correlation of particle structure and catalytic properties, which may help the identification of active sites on the metal nanoparticle catalysts [12]. This is the long-standing goal of catalysis research.

Amidation reaction is an important route for producing pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, dyes, and fine chemicals [13, 14]. Significant efforts have been invested in the efficient synthesis of imines from secondary amines under mild conditions favorable for practical applications [15-17]. However, the one-pot synthesis of benzalaniline involves the condensation of a carbonyl compound and an amine, and is therefore, difficult to realize due to the exceedingly active nature of carbonyl compounds [18]. It has been shown that the formation of C-N bonds can be accomplished in the presence of Pd/C, Ir complex, or Fe/EDTA complex [19] through transfer hydrogenation or by utilizing a reducing agent; however, these methods are incompatible with imines containing C=N bonds.

In this study, we utilize a three-Pd-atom nanocluster protected by ligands to catalyze the one-pot synthesis of benzalaniline from nitrobenzene and benzaldehyde, and our catalyst exhibited efficient conversion and selectivity toward the partially hydrogenated product (benzalaniline). For comparison, conventional Pd nanoparticles were also synthesized and applied to the same reaction, and they afforded a completely hydrogenated product (benzylaniline). Our studies promote the exploration of well-defined nanoclusters as highly efficient catalysts for the synthesis of fine chemicals.

The composition of the Pd nanocluster was determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) (Fig. 1(a)), which confirmed that the formula of the nanocluster is Pd3Cl(PPh2)2(PPh3)3 (abbreviated as Pd3, hereinafter), which is consistent with the peak located at 1511 Da (note that the peaks at 984 and 1249 m/z, marked by the asterisks, are fragments resulting from MALDI instead of impurities, and the peaks might be assigned to Pd3Cl(PPh2)2(PPh3)2 and Pd3Cl(PPh2)2(PPh3), respectively). The atomic structure of the Pd3 nanocluster can be viewed as a triangle, as shown in Fig. 1(b), capped by one Cl, two PPh2, and three PPh3 ligands. The non-metallic nature of the Pd3 nanocluster is manifested in its optical spectrum (Fig. 1(c)), which exhibits multiple absorption bands centered at 340, 418, and 485 nm (reminiscent of quantum dot behavior). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis shows that the apparent binding energies of the Pd 3d electrons in the Pd3 nanocluster are blue-shifted, compared to the case with the bulk Pd electrons (Fig. 1(d)). The blue shift in the binding energy is typical for very small particles [20]. Note that the peak at 336.9 eV is assigned to Pd2+ and the peak at 336.4 eV to Pd0, indicating that the average charge carried by the Pd atoms in the nanocluster is relatively close to zero. These data revealed the unique structural and electronic properties of the Pd3 nanocluster, which differed remarkably from those of the corresponding Pd nanoparticles.

Fig. 1. MALDI-MS spectrum (a) and atomic structure (b) of the Pd3Cl(PPh2)2(PPh3)3 nanocluster. Color labels: green, Pd; pink, C; yellow, Cl; orange, P. H atoms are omitted for clarity. UV-vis (c) and Pd 3d XPS (d) profiles of the Pd3 nanoclusters.

Upon deposition of the Pd3 nanoclusters onto the oxide supports (γ-Al2O3, SiO2, MgO, and TiO2), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images clearly demonstrated the average size of the Pd3 clusters, i.e., about 2 nm, supported on γ-Al2O3. For comparison, Pd nanoparticles supported on these oxides were also prepared, and the average size was around 2-3 nm (Fig. S1). High-resolution TEM studies of the Pd nanoparticles indicated that the lattice spacing of 0.195 nm can be assigned to the {200} lattice fringes (Fig. S1).

The one-pot synthesis of benzalaniline from nitrobenzene and benzaldehyde was selected as a model reaction to distinguish the catalytic performance of the Pd3 nanocluster from that of Pd nanoparticles. As listed in Table 1, the catalytic activity of Pd3 is superior to that of Pd nanoparticles for this reaction. With the free Pd3 nanocluster as the catalyst, an excellent nitrobenzene conversion of 90.6% could already be achieved. The Pd3 nanoclusters supported by oxides displayed even better catalytic activity than that of Pd nanoparticles with a conversion exceeding 96.0% under the same reaction condition, regardless of the support being used, which had no inherent catalytic activity. The supported Pd3 nanocluster showed a higher conversion than that of supported Pd nanoparticles by 10-25%. More importantly, the Pd3 nanoclusters and Pd nanoparticles exhibited distinct product selectivity, with the Pd3 nanocluster favoring the partially hydrogenated product (benzalaniline), and the Pd nanoparticles favoring the completely hydrogenated product (benzylaniline). The highest selectivity towards benzalaniline was obtained with the Pd3 nanoclusters supported by MgO. In addition, the commercial Pd/C catalyst afforded very high conversion of nitrobenzene, but a very low selectivity towards benzalaniline.

Table 1
Catalytic performance of the Pd3 nanoclusters and Pd nanoparticles for the benzalaniline synthesis of nitrobenzene and benzaldehyde.a

To show the stability of the Pd3 catalyst, the cycle performance of Pd3/γ-Al2O3 was tested using recycled catalysts under the same reaction conditions after simple centrifugation and washing with methanol. As illustrated in Fig. S2, no obvious decrease in the activity was observed, indicating the excellent reliability of this reaction system. To detect possible Pd leaching from the catalysts, inductively coupled plasma (ICP) spectroscopy was employed to measure the Pd species in the reaction solution, and no Pd species was detected. Furthermore, we conducted a comparison experiment: the reaction proceeded for 10 h, after which the catalyst was isolated. Subsequently, the reaction continued without the Pd catalyst for another 10 h. Consequently, the conversion of nitrobenzene in the reaction system without the Pd3 catalyst did not increase compared to that in the first 10 h of reaction with the Pd3 catalyst (Table 1), which further indicated that the leaching phenomenon of Pd was negligible. The Pd3 nanoclusters were very stable during the reaction, which was confirmed by the UV-vis spectroscopic fingerprints of the fresh and used catalysts, and no obvious spectral change was observed (Fig. S3).

To elucidate the mechanism for the distinct catalytic performances of the Pd3 nanoclusters and Pd nanoparticles, H-D exchange was carried out to explain how the atomic arrangement of Pd catalysts controlled the selective hydrogenation in the amidation reaction. Fig. 2 presents the significant H-D evolutions with the increasing temperatures of γ-Al2O3, Pd3/γ-Al2O3, and Pd NPs/γ-Al2O3. In these H-D exchange experiments, four kinds of surface H species related to the three samples could be identified. The H-D evolution peak, α, observed at 303 ℃, was mainly due to the hydroxyl (HO-Al). For Pd3/γ-Al2O3, the new peak, β, located at 133 ℃ was assigned to the specific H species connected to the Pd3 clusters, since the initial peak belonging to HO-Al is quite distant from it. For the Pd nanoparticles supported on γ-Al2O3, there are two evolution peaks located at 168 and 264 ℃: the first peak, denoted by γ, is assigned to the chemisorbed H on the Pd nanoparticles; the second, denoted by δ, originates from HO-Al, which shifts to lower temperature due to the dissociation of its H catalyzed by the Pd contents [21, 22]. Thus, compared to that of γ-Al2O3, the abilities of Pd3/γ-Al2O3 and Pd NPs/γ-Al2O3 to dissociate H are both enhanced, although to different levels, with Pd NPs/γ-Al2O3 reaching H−D equilibrium at a temperature higher than that of Pd3/γ-Al2O3 by 35 ℃. The H-D exchange results show that Pd3/γ-Al2O3 is more active for the hydrogenation during the one-pot synthesis of benzalaniline from nitrobenzene and benzaldehyde

Fig. 2. H-D exchange profiles of Pd3/γ-Al2O3, Pd NPs/γ-Al2O3, and γ-Al2O3.

Temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) is usually adopted to measure the adsorption strength and capacity of the adsorbents onto the catalysts. The TPD spectra of H and benzalaniline on the Pd3 nanoclusters and Pd NPs are illustrated in Fig. 3. As shown in Fig. 3(a), no H was adsorbed on the bare support and H was only adsorbed on the Pd sites. The peak at 349 ℃ for the Pd3 nanocluster was assigned to the chemisorption of H, whereas the peak indicative of the hydrogenation desorption for Pd NPs was located at 287 ℃. Although the Pd NPs was found to have a lower hydrogen desorption temperature than that of the Pd3 catalyst, the Pd3 catalyst exhibited a relatively larger peak area than that of the Pd NPs. The ratio of the desorption peak areas for these two samples was estimated to be ~2.9:1. The amount of H desorbed by TPD was consistent with the change in the amount of H measured by chemisorption, which reflected the change in the dispersion of the active components in the catalyst [23, 24]. These phenomena indicated that the H chemisorption capacity of the Pd3 catalyst was greater than that of the Pd NPs, which is consistent with the higher hydrogenation activity of the Pd3 catalyst.

Fig. 3. TPD profiles of H2 (a) and benzalaniline (b) for different samples.

Moreover, there were significant differences from the benzalaniline-TPD results of the Pd3 and Pd NPs catalysts. As shown in Fig. 3(b), the desorption of benzalaniline over Pd3 started at 79 ℃ and reached maximum speed at 244 ℃, while the initial desorption of benzalaniline over Pd NPs occurred at around 146 ℃; the fastest desorption occurred at 338 ℃. The adsorption capacities of benzalaniline deduced from the peak areas suggested that the interaction of benzalaniline with Pd3 was much weaker than that with Pd NPs, and thus relatively high selectivity for benzalaniline was achieved by Pd3. The intriguing point is that the asymmetric shape of the peaks is in conjunction with the first order kinetics [25], implying that the adsorption behavior is non-dissociative. In conclusion, the results demonstrate that benzalaniline was easily formed in the Pd3 system rather than in the Pd NPs.

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed using the Pd3 cluster and the Pd(100) surface as models of the Pd3 nanocluster and Pd nanoparticle catalysts, respectively, to elucidate the catalytic mechanism and the reason behind the different product selectivities. Fig. 4(a) presents the potential energy surface (PES) for the formation of benzalaniline (PhN=CHPh) from the reaction of aniline (PhNH2) and benzaldehyde (PhCH=O) catalyzed by the Pd3 cluster. Although nitrobenzene (PhNO2) was used as the N source, it was expected to be readily reduced to aniline by hydrogenation, and the latter was actually involved in the reductive coupling reaction with benzaldehyde. As shown in the enlarged image of the Pd3 cluster (Figs. 4(a) and S5, A-1), the Pd3 core is capped by three terminal PPh3 neutral ligands below the plane, two bridge PPh2, and one bridge Cl anionic ligand above the plane; the adsorption of the reactants will displace the relatively small Cl ligand. When the Cl anion is displaced by the O from PhCH=O (A-2), it still interacts with the rest of the cluster by electrostatic force, and this step is predicted to be quite exothermic (-2.24 eV), suggesting that the adsorption of PhCH=O is very favorable. This is followed by the transfer of H from PhNH2 to the O atom on the adsorbed PhCH=O (A-3), which is modestly endothermic (0.83 eV). Subsequently, PhN=CHPh is formed by further H transfer from N to O, accompanied by the formation of H2O (A-4), which is exothermic (-0.54 eV). The interaction of PhN=CHPh with the Pd3 core is found to be much weaker than that with the Cl anion; therefore, the regeneration of the Pd3 catalyst (A-5) is also exothermic (-1.84 eV). The selective formation of PhN=CHPh is partly due to its weak interaction with the Pd3 cluster; thus, its further hydrogenation is unfavorable.

Fig. 4. Potential energy surfaces for the reaction between aniline (PhNH2) and benzaldehyde (PhCH=O) over the Pd3 cluster (a) and the Pd(100) surface as catalyst models (b) for the supported Pd3 and Pd nanoparticle catalysts. Only atoms relevant to the reaction are displayed with C, H, N, and Pd atoms shown in black, white, blue, and light green, respectively. Enlarged images are given in Figs. S4-S6.

For the one-pot synthesis of benzalaniline from PhNO2 and PhCH=O catalyzed by the Pd(100) surface, we focused our calculations on the hydrogenative coupling between PhNH2 and PhCH=O. Although the Pd(100) surface can simultaneously adsorb both reactants, PhNH2 through N, and PhCH=O through C and O (Figs. 4(b) and S6, B-2), the adsorption is not very strong, as the combined adsorption energy is only -0.63 eV. Therefore, two H transfer steps (B-3 and B-4) occur from N to O to form H2O and PhN=CHPh, both of which are slightly endothermic (0.42 and 0.38 eV, respectively). Unlike the case of the Pd3 cluster, where the adsorption of PhN=CHPh is weaker than that of the Cl anion, here, PhN=CHPh is quite strongly adsorbed on the Pd(100) surface via both N and C atoms. Due to the presence of adsorbed H on the Pd(100) surface, PhN=CHPh can further be hydrogenated to form benzylaniline (PhNHCH2Ph) also in two steps (B-5 and B-6), both of which are exothermic (-0.93 and -0.56 eV); therefore, the formation of the completely hydrogenated product is more favorable over the Pd nanoparticle catalyst. Thus, the difference in the selectivities between the Pd3 cluster and Pd nanoparticle catalysts is largely due to the presence of protective ligands in the former, which inhibit the complete hydrogenation of PhN=CHPh.

In summary, we discovered an efficient and easily recyclable Pd3 nanocluster catalyst for the one-pot synthesis of benzalaniline from nitrobenzene and benzaldehyde, which exhibited very high activity and selectivity toward the partially hydrogenated product, in sharp contrast to the catalytic performance of typical Pd nanoparticles that afforded the completely hydrogenated product. The different behaviors in the adsorption and reaction of the reactants of the two catalysts are found to be responsible for their distinct catalytic behaviors based on both catalyst characterizations and theoretical calculations. The atomically precise metal nanoclusters give way to a new type of metal catalyst with high efficiency for certain industrially important chemical processes and highlight the importance of pursuing atomic-precise metal nanoclusters for catalysis science and technology.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge financial supports from National Natural Science Foundation of China (21773109, 91845104).

References
[1]
A. Alshammari, V. N. Kalevaru, A. Martin, In: Green Nanotechnology-Overview and Further Prospects, M. Larramendy, eds., Intechopen, Rijeka, 2016, 1-34.
[2]
S. Wang, B. Zeng, C. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 1219-1227. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63094-3
[3]
Y. Xia, T. D. Nguyen, M. Yang, B. Lee, A. Santos, P. Podsiadlo, Z. Tang, S. C. Glotzer, N. A. Kotov, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2011, 6, 580-587. DOI:10.1038/nnano.2011.121
[4]
P. Wang, S. Xu, F. Chen, H. Yu, Chin. J. Catal, 2019, 40, 343-351. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63157-2
[5]
D. Astruc, F. Lu, J. R. Aranzaes, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed, 2005, 44, 7852-7872. DOI:10.1002/anie.200500766
[6]
Y.-G. Wang, D. Mei, V.-A. Glezakou, J. Li, R. Rousseau, Nat. Commun, 2015, 6, 6511-6519. DOI:10.1038/ncomms7511
[7]
M. Haruta, M. Daté, Appl. Catal. A, 2001, 222, 427-437. DOI:10.1016/S0926-860X(01)00847-X
[8]
X. Kang, H. Chong, M. Zhu, Nanoscale, 2018, 10, 10758-10834. DOI:10.1039/C8NR02973C
[9]
F. Fu, J. Xiang, H. Cheng, L. Cheng, H. Chong, S. Wang, P. Li, S. Wei, M. Zhu, Y. Li, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 1860-1867. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.6b02527
[10]
Y. Tan, H. Liu, X. Y. Liu, A. Wang, C. Liu, T. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 929-936. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63018-9
[11]
Y. Zhu, H. Qian, B. A. Drake, R. Jin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 1295-1298. DOI:10.1002/anie.200906249
[12]
G. Li, R. Jin, Acc. Chem. Res, 2013, 46, 1749-1758. DOI:10.1021/ar300213z
[13]
J. Ward, R. Wohlgemuth, Curr. Org. Chem, 2010, 14, 1914-1927. DOI:10.2174/138527210792927546
[14]
J. Matsuo, Y. Tanaki, H. Ishibashi, Org. Lett, 2006, 8, 4371-4374. DOI:10.1021/ol0618095
[15]
R. Yamaguchi, C. Ikeda, Y. Takahashi, K.-I. Fujita, J. Am.Chem. Soc, 2009, 131, 8410-8412. DOI:10.1021/ja9022623
[16]
A. Nishinaga, S. ki Yamaza, T. Matsuura, Tetrahedron Lett, 1988, 29, 4115-4118. DOI:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)80431-1
[17]
[18]
A. Grirrane, A. Corma, H. Garcia, J. Catal, 2009, 264, 138-144. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2009.03.015
[19]
J. Deng, L.-P. Mo, F.-Y. Zhao, L.-L. Hou, L. Yang, Z.-H. Zhang, Green Chem., 2011, 13, 2576-2584. DOI:10.1039/c1gc15470b
[20]
B. Delley, D. E. Ellis, A. J. Freeman, E. J. Baerends, D. Post, Phys. Rev. B,, 1983, 27, 2132-2144. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.27.2132
[21]
V. Almasan, T. Gaeumann, M. Lazar, P. Marginean, N. Aldea, In Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal, 1997, 5, 547-552.
[22]
T. Fu, M. Wang, W. Cai, Y. Cui, F. Gao, L. Peng, W. Chen, W. Ding, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 2536-2543. DOI:10.1021/cs500523k
[23]
I. Witońska, S. Karski, M. Frajtak, N. Krawczyk, A. Królak, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett, 2008, 93, 241-248. DOI:10.1007/s11144-008-5237-2
[24]
R. S. Smith, R. A. May, B. D. Kay, J. Phys. Chem.B, 2015, 120, 1979-1987.
[25]
D. Li, R. Li, M. Lu, X. Lin, Y. Zhan, L. Jiang, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 200, 566-577. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.07.050