催化学报  2020, Vol. 41 Issue (1): 2-8      DOI: S1872-2067(19)63465-0   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Guancai Xie
Ullah Jan Saad
Zejian Dong
Yawen Dai
Boddula Rajender
Yuxuan Wei
Chang Zhao
Qi Xin
Jiao-Na Wang
Yinfang Du
Lan Ma
Beidou Guo
Jian Ru Gong
GaP/GaPN core/shell nanowire array on silicon for enhanced photoelectrochemical hydrogen production
Guancai Xiea,b,†, Ullah Jan Saada,b,†, Zejian Donga,b, Yawen Daia,b, Boddula Rajendera, Yuxuan Weia,b, Chang Zhaoa,b, Qi Xina, Jiao-Na Wangc, Yinfang Duc, Lan Mac, Beidou Guoa,b, Jian Ru Gonga,b     
a. ;
b. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, CAS Key Laboratory of Nanosystem and Hierarchy Fabrication, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, China;
c. University of CAS, Beijing 100049, China
* Corresponding author. Beidou Guo, Tel: +86-10-82545649; Fax: +86-10-62656765; E-mail: guobd@nanoctr.cn;
Jian Ru Gong, Tel: +86-10-82545649; Fax: +86-10-62656765; E-mail: gongjr@nanoctr.cn
These authors contributed equally to this paper
The authors acknowledge financial support for this work from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21422303, 21573049, 21872043, 81602643), Beijing Natural Science Foundation (2142036), Youth Innovation Promotion Association, and Special Program of "One Belt One Road" of CAS
Abstract: Simultaneously improving the efficiency and stability on a large scale is significant for the development of photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting systems. Here, we demonstrated a novel design of GaP/GaPN core/shell nanowire (NW) decorated p-Si photocathode for improved PEC hydrogen production performance compared to that of bare p-Si photocathode. The formation of the p-n junction between p-Si and GaP NW promotes charge separation, and the lower conduction band position of GaPN relative to that of GaP further facilitates the transfer of photogenerated electrons to the electrode surface. In addition, the NW morphology both shortens the carrier collection distance and increases the specific surface area, which result in superior reaction kinetics. Moreover, introduction of N in GaP is beneficial for enhancing the light absorption as well as stability. Our efficient and facile strategy can be applied to other solar energy conversion systems as well.
© 2020, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Core/shell nanowire    GaP    GaPN    Hydrogen production    Si    Solar water splitting    Tandem structure    
GaP/GaPN核壳纳米线阵列修饰的硅光阴极的光电化学制氢反应
谢关才a,b,†, Ullah Jan Saada,b,†, 董泽健a,b, 代亚雯a,b, Rajender Boddulaa, 魏玉轩a,b, 赵唱a,b, 辛琪a, 王娇娜c, 杜银芳c, 马兰c, 郭北斗a,b, 宫建茹a,b     
a. 国家纳米科学中心, 中科院纳米系统与多级次重点实验室, 中科院纳米科学卓越创新中心, 北京 100190;
b. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
c. 北京服装学院, 北京 100029
摘要:能够大规模同时提升电极的催化效率和稳定性对光电化学分解水系统的开发具有重要意义.硅是一种地球储量丰富且成熟的工业材料,由于其合适的带隙(1.1eV)和优异的导电性,已被广泛用于光电化学制氢反应.然而,缓慢的表面催化反应和在电解液中的不稳定性限制了其在太阳能制氢中的实际应用.Ⅲ-IV族半导体材料也具有较高的载流子传输特性且被广泛用于光电器件.其中,GaP的直接带隙和间接带隙分别为2.78和2.26eV,可与硅组成串联型光电极用于光电化学分解水.然而,GaP的光腐蚀电位位于禁带中,很容易在光电催化过程中发生光腐蚀而导致性能大幅下降.本文报道了一种新型的GaP/GaPN核/壳纳米线修饰的p型硅(p-Si)串联型光阴极,同未修饰的p-Si相比,其光电化学制氢性能更高.这可归因于以下几点:(1)p-Si和GaP纳米线之间形成的p-n结促进了电荷分离;(2)GaPN相对于GaP具有更低的导带边位置,进一步促进了光生电子向电极表面的转移;(3)纳米线结构既缩短了光生载流子的收集距离,又增加了比表面积,从而加快了表面反应动力学.此外,在GaP中引入氮元素还提高了体系的光吸收和稳定性.我们所提出的高效、简便的改进策略可应用于其他的太阳能转换体系.利用简单的化学气相沉积法制备GaP/GaPN核/壳纳米线修饰的p-Si光阴极.首先在p-Si衬底上利用Au纳米颗粒作为催化剂生长GaP纳米线;然后,去除Au催化剂,并在氨气中退火便形成了GaP/GaPN核壳纳米线.高分辨透射电子显微镜,拉曼光谱和X射线光电子谱的表征结果均证实了氨气退火使得GaP纳米线表面形成了GaPN的薄壳层,同时证明了GaP/GaPN核壳纳米线具有可调的核壳结构.在模拟太阳光下作为光阴极用于光解水制氢反应时,GaP/GaPN核壳纳米线修饰的p-Si光阴极的起始电位为~0.14V,而未修饰的p-Si电极的起始电位大约在-0.77V.而且,GaP/GaPN核/壳纳米线修饰的p-Si光阴极比未修饰的p-Si光阴极具有更高的光电流密度,在水的还原电位下,其光电流密度为-0.3mA cm-2,且饱和光电流密度在-0.76V时达到了-8.8mA cm-2.此外,GaP/GaPN核/壳纳米线修饰的p-Si光阴极的光电化学活性在10 h内没有发生明显下降.由此可见GaP/GaPN核/壳纳米线可以规模化有效地提升Si光电极的催化效率和稳定性.
关键词核壳纳米线    GaP    GaPN    制氢        光解水    串联结构    

Solar energy can be effectively utilized to alleviate the global energy and environmental crisis. Among the various solar energy harvesting technologies, hydrogen production through photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting is a promising way of realizing solar energy conversion and storage and remains the center of attraction for the scientific community [1-6]. One of the key requirements for the PEC system is an efficient and stable photocathode [7, 8]. In the past few decades, researchers have been searching for better materials for PEC water splitting [5, 9-13]. Si, an earth abundant and matured industrial material, has been widely used for the PEC hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) because of its bandgap (Eg = 1.1 eV), which matches well with the solar spectrum and is suitable for reducing water to produce hydrogen [14-19]. However, the sluggish surface reaction and instability in electrolytes limit its practical application in solar hydrogen production [4, 20-23]. Tremendous efforts have been devoted to improving the Si performance by coating metals [24, 25], despite the issue of parasitic light absorption [26]. Some oxide overlayers (such as Fe2O3 [22], TiO2 [27-29], and ZnO [30]) have been used to protect the Si photocathode, which compromises the maximum achievable photocurrent efficiency, and the poor HER catalytic performance of these oxide overlayers is often compensated by coupling with expensive electrocatalysts like Pt and Ru [26]. Additionally, associated problems such as low conductivity, poor chemical stability, and large lattice mismatch, which result in sluggish interfacial charge transfer and poor film quality, limit the PEC performance [30-32]. Therefore, a more efficient overlayer is urgently needed to obtain a high performance with Si photocathode.

Ⅲ–Ⅴ materials, which show excellent charge carrier transport properties, have been widely used in the optoelectronic field. Among them, GaP, which exhibits a direct bandgap of 2.78 eV and an indirect bandgap of 2.26 eV [33], satisfies the requirement of a large bandgap absorber that can produce an optimal tandem structure with Si, which can serve as the lower bandgap material [34]. Owing to the existence of P vacancies, the GaP nanowires (NWs) grown by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method are inherently n-type [35, 36]. Therefore, the growth of GaP on Si through CVD method will lead to the formation of a p-n junction between the p-Si and the n-GaP NWs that improves the efficiency of charge separation. Otherwise, the small lattice mismatch between Si and GaP (only 0.36%) ensures that the high-quality GaP can grow epitaxially on the Si substrate, which results in a better passivation effect and more efficient charge transfer. Moreover, the fabrication of GaP/Si heterojunction is a cost-effective strategy compared to the widely used expensive native substrate [37]. Considering the short minority carrier diffusion lengths (Ld) of GaP, which are small (6 μm–100 nm) [34] relative to its absorption depths (500 μm near bandgap, 10 μm at 486 nm) [33, 34], nanostructuring can facilitate the rapid diffusion of the photogenerated charge carriers [38]. In this context, one-dimensional (1D) NWs can afford a promising nanostructure. The highly anisotropic 1D geometry can decouple the long axis necessary for complete absorption of light from the orthogonal short axis, thereby allowing effective charge transport and collection over short distances [3]. However, the photodecomposition potentials of GaP are in-between the conduction and covalent band edge energy levels, therefore, this material usually undergoes degradation under operating conditions when employed as a photoelectrode [20, 33, 37, 39]. Since it is known that GaP is more unstable than CdS, the protection layer is always directly added onto GaP for solar water splitting [37, 39, 40]. Furthermore, GaP exhibits poor light absorption, specifically in the long-wavelength range [33].

Here, we design a novel GaP/GaPN core/shell NW decorated p–Si photocathode (p–Si–cs–NW) for PEC hydrogen production that shows a greatly improved performance compared to that of the bare p–Si photocathode. GaPN displays a higher stability because of the existence of stronger ionic bonds, compared to GaP [41]. In addition, incorporation of a small amount (usually several percentages) of N atoms into the GaP host lattice not only significantly reduces the bandgap via the giant bowing effect but also transforms it from an indirect bandgap semiconductor (in the case of GaP) to a quasi-direct bandgap material (in the case of GaNP), which enhances the light absorption [41, 42]. The alignment of energy levels at the p-Si-cs-NW interface will favor the charge transfer. In addition, the NW nanostructure [3, 31, 38] can both shorten the carrier collection distance and increase the specific surface area, which promote the reaction kinetics and improve the anti-reflection property of the photoelectrode [43, 44]. This efficient and scalable strategy is expected to yield higher PEC water-splitting performances.

The p-Si-cs-NW photocathode was fabricated by synthesizing GaP/GaPN cs-NWs on a p-Si(100) substrate through the facile CVD method. After the GaP NW growth, the Au catalyst nanoparticles (NPs) were removed, which was followed by annealing of the as-grown NWs in NH3 atmosphere at 750 ℃ to form a GaPN shell as a protection layer (Scheme 1, Figs. S1–5).

Scheme 1. Illustration of the fabrication of p-Si-cs-NW photocathode. The zoomed–in area shows the cross–section of GaP/GaPN cs–NW

Representative scanning electron microscope (SEM) images (Fig. 1(a) and 1(b)) show that the as-synthesized free-standing straight GaP NWs exhibit diameters that are nearly 100 nm and lengths of the order of several micrometers. The high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) image (Fig. 1(c)) of the NW with a lattice distance of 0.31 nm confirms that it is GaP [45]. The inset of the fast Fourier transform (FFT) image suggests that the GaP NW grows along the [111] direction and adopts the zinc-blende structure [39, 46]. Energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) mapping was utilized to analyze the elemental distribution in the catalyst NPs, and Ga, P, and Au can be seen clearly on the top of each NW (Fig. 1(d)–(g)), which confirm that the NWs grow through the vapor liquid solid mechanism [47-49]. After removing the Au NPs and annealing in NH3, the morphology of the cs-NW displays negligible differences (Fig. 1(h)–(i)) when compared with that of GaP, whereas an amorphous shell with the thickness of ~2.7 nm was observed in the HRTEM image shown in Fig. 1(j). The thickness of the amorphous shell can be tuned by varying the annealing time (Fig. S6). The elemental maps of the cs-NW show concentration of Ga, P, and dilute N, which is due to the presence of an extremely thin shell (Fig. 1(k)–(n)). The EDS line scan profile (in the radial direction of the NW) was also obtained to observe the distribution of N; the very low N signal, compared to the signals of Ga and P, further confirms the formation of the thin shell on the surface of the GaP NW (Fig. S7). The atomic ratio of Ga/P/N in the as-synthesized nanowires is 47.5:41.8:6.6 (Fig. S8).

Fig. 1. Low-(a) and high-(b) magnification SEM images of GaP NWs. (c) HRTEM image of GaP NW, inset: FFT image of the GaP NW body. (d) High-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) image of the GaP NWs (scale bars: 50 nm). (e–g) TEM EDS mapping data of the GaP NWs (scale bars: 50 nm). Low-(h) and high-(i) magnification SEM images of cs-NW. (j) HRTEM image of the cs-NW. (k) HAADF-STEM image of the cs-NW. (l–n) TEM EDS maps of the cs-NW (scale bars: 25 nm)

To investigate the crystal structure and the effect of N doping on the as-grown GaP NWs, the X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Fig. 2(a)) patterns of p-Si-cs-NW were collected, along with that of the GaP NWs as a control sample, by using grazing incidence mode to avoid the effect of the reflections from the underlying Si substrate [5]. Both the samples show sharp diffraction peaks that are associated with zinc-blende GaP (PDF card no. 32-0397), which suggest an excellent crystallinity [50]. A slight shift in the major peak position was observed after the NH3 annealing, which clarifies that GaP is the main component even after the incorporation of N.

Fig. 2. XRD pattern (a), Raman spectra (b), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) N 1s patterns (c) of p-Si-cs-NW and p-Si-GaP NW

Raman spectroscopy (Fig. 2(b)) was performed to better understand the structural changes induced by N incorporation in p-Si-cs-NW. For a comparison, the p-Si-GaP NW sample was also analyzed. For both the samples, two peaks at 365 and 401 cm‒1 are observed that correspond to the transverse (TO) and longitudinal (LO) phonon modes of GaP, respectively [47]. The appearance of the surface optical (SO) peak for p-Si-cs-NW [51], which is located between 390 and 400 cm‒1, is in accordance with the Raman results of the cs-NW reported previously, where the SO mode is a signature of the incorporation of N [52]. Its occurrence is usually interpreted by a break in the translational symmetry, which, in our case, can be caused by the insertion of N into the GaP matrix [48]. XPS was employed to examine the chemical environment [46] of the GaP NWs before and after the annealing in NH3. The N 1s XPS peak at ~397.5 eV for the samples annealed in NH3 indicates that the N atom is bound to the Ga atom [46] (Fig. 2(c)), whereas the observance of no peaks at 400 eV or higher binding energies suggests the absence of other N species (N2 or NOx groups) [46]. In summary, HRTEM, Raman, and XPS together prove that the thin GaPN shell developed on the surface of GaP NWs after annealing in NH3 forms the GaP/GaPN core-shell NW structure on the p-Si substrate.

The photocurrent density-applied potential (J-V) characteristics of the p-Si-cs-NW photocathode (Fig. 3(a)) were recorded under the irradiation of standard simulated AM 1.5G sunlight (100 mW cm‒2) to evaluate the PEC HER performance, along with that of p-Si as a comparison. The dark responses of both the electrodes are very small compared to their corresponding photoresponses. The bare p-Si shows a large negative onset potential (–0.77 V, blue line) and displays no photocurrent at the water reduction potential. In contrast, the p-Si-cs-NW photocathode reveals a larger photocurrent with a significant positive shift in the onset potential to ~0.14 V. The photocurrent density at the water reduction potential is –0.3 mA cm‒2 and the saturated photocurrent density reaches –8.8 mA cm‒2 at –0.76 V. The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) of p-Si-cs-NW (Fig. 3(b)) is lower than 15% in the wavelength range below 450 nm and increases rapidly with increasing wavelength, reaching the highest value of 50% at 800 nm. The PEC activity shows no obvious decrease over 10 h, which confirms the dramatically improved stability, thanks to the protection of GaPN (Fig. S9).

Fig. 3. (a) J-V curves of p-Si and p-Si-cs-NW photocathodes. (b) Result of IPCE test performed on the p-Si-cs-NW photocathode

To explore the fundamental reason behind the improvement in the performance of the p-Si-cs-NW photocathode compared to that of the bare p-Si, UV-vis absorption and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were employed to investigate the light absorption and charge transfer properties of the photocathodes. The absorption spectra (Fig. 4(a)) reveal that both p-Si-GaP NW and p-Si-cs-NW structures on the Si substrate increase the light absorption at wavelengths shorter than ~500 nm, and N doping increases the light absorption at longer wavelengths owing to the decrease in the bandgap and the formation of the quasi-direct bandgap material GaPN [41]. This tandem heterostructure ensures efficient light absorption over the entire wavelength range, which contributes to the activity enhancement. In addition, this heterostructure is beneficial to the charge transfer at the two interfaces. First, the p-n junction formed between p-Si and GaP improves the charge separation and, second, the conduction band of the GaPN shell is slightly lower than that of the GaP core [53] (Fig. 4(b)). Consequently, the photogenerated electrons prefer to move from Si and GaP to GaPN, while holes migrate in the reverse direction, which increases the charge separation efficiency. Furthermore, owing to the nanostructure morphology, both the shortened carrier collection distance and the significantly increased specific surface area [3, 31, 38, 44] of the p-Si-cs-NW photocathode promote the reaction kinetics in the form of a smaller overpotential, compared to that of the planar p-Si. As evidenced from the EIS data (Fig. 4(c) and 4(d)), the diameter of the p-Si-cs-NW semicircle is very small compared to that of p-Si semicircle, which is indicative of a smaller charge transfer resistance at the electrode/electrolyte interface, which further confirms the occurrence of faster charge transfer at the interface of p-Si-cs-NW.

Fig. 4. (a) UV-vis absorption spectra of p-Si, p-Si-GaP NW, and p-Si-cs-NW. (b) Energy band scheme of p-Si-cs-NW photocathode. Nyquist curves (c) and enlarge views (d) of the EIS plots for p-Si and p-Si-cs-NW photocathodes. In the equivalent circuits, Rs, RSi, ct, RSi, and RGaPN, ct represent the solution resistance and the charge transfer resistances at the Si-electrolyte interface, Si-GaPN interface, and GaPN-electrolyte interface, respectively. CSi and CGaPN, represent the capacitances of the space charge regions in Si and GaPN, respectively

In summary, we demonstrated the design of p-Si-cs-NW decorated p-Si photocathode for improved PEC hydrogen production performance compared to that of bare p-Si. The formation of the p-n junction between p-Si and GaP NW favors charge separation, and the lower conduction band position of GaPN relative to that of GaP further facilitates the transfer of photogenerated electrons to the electrode surface. In addition, the NW morphology both shortens the carrier collection distance and increases the specific surface area, which promote the reaction kinetics. Moreover, the introduction of N in GaP is beneficial for enhancing the light absorption, as well as for improving the stability. Further improvement in the PEC performance is expected by optimizing the structural parameters and loading suitable electrocatalysts into this structure. Our efficient and facile strategy can also be applied to other solar energy conversion systems.

Supporting Information

p–Si–GaP NW, p–Si–cs–NW growth experimental details, AFM, SEM, EDX, XRD patterns, stability test, fabrication of photoelectrode, electrochemical measurements, characterizations details of samples.

References
[1]
K. Sivula, R. van de Krol, Nat. Rev. Mater., 2016, 1, 15010. DOI:10.1038/natrevmats.2015.10
[2]
Y. Lv, A. Batool, Y. Wei, Q. Xin, R. Boddula, S. U. Jan, M. Z. Akram, L. Tian, B. Guo, J.R. Gong, ChemElectroChem, 2019, 6, 2497-2502. DOI:10.1002/celc.201900185
[3]
B. Guo, L. Tian, W. Xie, A. Batool, G. Xie, Q. Xiang, S. U. Jan, R. Boddula, J.R. Gong, Nano Lett., 2018, 18, 5954-5960. DOI:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02740
[4]
B. Guo, A. Batool, G. Xie, R. Boddula, L. Tian, S. U. Jan, J.R. Gong, Nano Lett., 2018, 18, 1516-1521. DOI:10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b05314
[5]
K. Zhang, T. Dong, G. Xie, L. Guan, B. Guo, Q. Xiang, Y. Dai, L. Tian, A. Batool, S. U. Jan, R. Boddula, A. A. Thebo, J.R. Gong, ACS Appl. MateInterfaces r., 2017, 9, 42723-42733. DOI:10.1021/acsami.7b13163
[6]
P. Kuang, L. Zhang, B. Cheng, J. Yu, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 218, 570-580. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.002
[7]
S. Vanka, E. Arca, S. Cheng, K. Sun, G. A. Botton, G. Teeter, Z. Mi, Nano Lett., 2018, 18, 6530-6537. DOI:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03087
[8]
Z. Wang, L. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 369-378. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62998-X
[9]
I. S. Cho, H. S. Han, M. Logar, J. Park, X. Zheng, Adv. Energy Mater., 2016, 6, 1501840. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201501840
[10]
N. Kornienko, N. A. Gibson, H. Zhang, S. W. Eaton, Y. Yu, S. Aloni, S. R. Leone, P. Yang, ACS Nano, 2016, 10, 5525-5535. DOI:10.1021/acsnano.6b02083
[11]
Y. Li, T. Takata, D. Cha, K. Takanabe, T. Minegishi, J. Kubota, K. Domen, Adv Mater., 2013, 25, 125-131. DOI:10.1002/adma.201202582
[12]
M. Zhong, Y. Ma, P. Oleynikov, K. Domen, J.-J. Delaunay, Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, 7, 1693-1699. DOI:10.1039/c3ee43806f
[13]
Y. Wang, Y. Li, S. Cao, J. Yu, Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 40, 867-874. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63343-7
[14]
Q. Ding, F. Meng, C. R. English, M. Caban-Acevedo, M. J. Shearer, D. Liang, A. S. Daniel, R. J. Hamers, S. Jin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 8504-8507. DOI:10.1021/ja5025673
[15]
M. Basu, Z. W. Zhang, C. J. Chen, P. T. Chen, K. C. Yang, C. G. Ma, C. C. Lin, S. F. Hu, R.S. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 6211-6216. DOI:10.1002/anie.201502573
[16]
L. Wang, X. Gu, Y. Zhao, M. Wei, C. Huang, Y. Qiang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 448, 126-132. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.108
[17]
H. Meng, K. Fan, J. Low, J. Yu, Dalton Trans., 2016, 45, 13717-13725. DOI:10.1039/C6DT02340A
[18]
R. Fan, G. Huang, Y. Wang, Z. Mi, M. Shen, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 237, 158-165. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.05.083
[19]
W. Zhou, F. Niu, S. S. Mao, S. Shen, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 220, 362-366. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.065
[20]
M. G. Walter, E. L. Warren, J. R. Mckone, S. W. Boettcher, Q. Mi, E. A. Santori, N.S. Lewis, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 6446-6473. DOI:10.1021/cr1002326
[21]
J. Zhao, L. Cai, H. Li, X. Shi, X. Zheng, ACS Energy Lett., 2017, 2, 1939-1946. DOI:10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00597
[22]
A. Kargar, S. J. Kim, P. Allameh, C. Choi, N. Park, H. Jeong, Y. Pak, G. Y. Jung, X. Pan, D. Wang, S. Jin, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2015, 25, 2609-2615. DOI:10.1002/adfm.201404571
[23]
J. Feng, M. Gong, M. J. Kenney, J. Z. Wu, B. Zhang, Y. Li, H. Dai, Nano Res., 2015, 8, 1577-1583. DOI:10.1007/s12274-014-0643-4
[24]
R. N. Dominey, N. S. Lewis, J. A. Bruce, D. C. Bookbinder, M.S. Wrighton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104, 467-482. DOI:10.1021/ja00366a016
[25]
E. L. Warren, J. R. McKone, H. A. Atwater, H. B. Gray, N.S. Lewis, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 9653-9661. DOI:10.1039/c2ee23192a
[26]
D. Bae, B. Seger, P. C. K. Vesborg, O. Hansen, I. Chorkendorff, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2017, 46, 1933-1954. DOI:10.1039/C6CS00918B
[27]
S. Li, P. Zhang, X. Song, L. Gao, ACS Appl. MateInterfaces r., 2015, 7, 18560-18565. DOI:10.1021/acsami.5b04936
[28]
X. Zhu, Z. Guan, P. Wang, Q. Zhang, Y. Dai, B. Huang, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 1704-1710. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63127-4
[29]
Z. Dong, D. Ding, T. Li, C. Ning, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 436, 125-133. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.030
[30]
Z. Bao, X. Xu, G. Zhou, J. Hu, Nanotechnology, 2016, 27, 305403. DOI:10.1088/0957-4484/27/30/305403
[31]
K. Sun, S. Shen, Y. Liang, P. E. Burrows, S. S. Mao, D. Wang, Chem. Rev., 2014, 114, 8662-8719. DOI:10.1021/cr300459q
[32]
A. Kargar, K. Sun, Y. Jing, C. Choi, H. Jeong, G. Y. Jung, S. Jin, D. Wang, ACS Nano, 2013, 7, 9407-9415. DOI:10.1021/nn404170y
[33]
M. Malizia, B. Seger, I. Chorkendorff, P.C. K. Vesborg, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 6847-6853. DOI:10.1039/C4TA00752B
[34]
N. C. Strandwitz, D.B. Turner-Evans, A. C. Tamboli, C. T. Chen, H. A. Atwater, N.S. Lewis, Adv. Energy Mater., 2012, 2, 1109-1116. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201100728
[35]
R. Krauserehberg, A. Polity, W. Siegel, G. Kuhnel, Semicond. Sci. Technol., 1993, 8, 290. DOI:10.1088/0268-1242/8/2/022
[36]
S. Lee, W. Wen, Q. Cheek, S. Maldonado, J. CrysGrowth t., 2018, 482, 36-43.
[37]
M. Alqahtani, S. Sathasivam, F. Cui, L. Steier, X. Xia, C. Blackman, E. Kim, H. Shin, M. Benamara, Y. I. Mazur, G. J. Salamo, I. P. Parkin, H. Liu, J. Wu, J. Mater. Chem. A., 2019, 7, 8550-8558. DOI:10.1039/C9TA01328H
[38]
Y. Abbas, Z. Zuhra, N. Akhtar, S. Ali, J.R. Gong, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2018, 1, 3529-3536. DOI:10.1021/acsaem.8b00346
[39]
A. Standing, S. Assali, L. Gao, M. A. Verheijen, D. van Dam, Y. Cui, P. H. Notten, J. E. Haverkort, E.P. A. M. Bakkers, Nat Commun., 2015, 6, 7824. DOI:10.1038/ncomms8824
[40]
J. Li, N. Wu, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2015, 5, 1360-1384. DOI:10.1039/C4CY00974F
[41]
T. G. Deutsch, C. A. Koval, J.A. Turner, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110, 25297-25307. DOI:10.1021/jp0652805
[42]
S. L. Chen, W. M. M. Chen, I.A. Buyanova, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2018, 122, 19212-19218. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b05199
[43]
H. K. Kang, J. Y. Kim, M. S. Noh, C. Y. Kang, Y. D. Kim, M. H. Cho, J.D. Song, Nano Energy, 2018, 53, 57-65. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.08.029
[44]
S. Liu, Z. R. Tang, Y. Sun, J. C. Colmenares, Y.J. Xu, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2015, 44, 5053-5075. DOI:10.1039/C4CS00408F
[45]
A. Kargar, S. Sukrittanon, C. Zhou, Y. G. Ro, X. Pan, S. A. Dayeh, C. W. Tu, S. Jin, Small, 2017, 13, 1603574. DOI:10.1002/smll.201603574
[46]
W. Wen, A. I. Carim, S. M. Collins, M. J. Price, S. L. Peczonczyk, S. Maldonado, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 22652-22661. DOI:10.1021/jp208058h
[47]
Q. Xiong, R. Gupta, K. W. Adu, E. C. Dickey, G. D. Lian, D. Tham, J. E. Fischer, P.C. Eklunda, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2003, 3, 335-339. DOI:10.1166/jnn.2003.208
[48]
M. Steidl, K. Schwarzburg, B. Galiana, T. Kups, O. Supplie, P. Kleinschmidt, G. Lilienkamp, T. Hannappel, Nanotechnology, 2019, 30, 104002. DOI:10.1088/1361-6528/aaf607
[49]
M. Steidl, M. Wu, K. Peh, P. Kleinschmidt, E. Spiecker, T. Hannappel, Nanoscale Res. Lett., 2018, 13, 417. DOI:10.1186/s11671-018-2833-6
[50]
H. W. Seo, S. Y. Bae, J. Park, M.-I. Kang, S. Kim, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2003, 378, 420-424. DOI:10.1016/j.cplett.2003.07.004
[51]
A. Dobrovolsky, S. Sukrittanon, Y. J. Kuang, C. W. Tu, W. M. Chen, I. A. Buyanova, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2014, 105, 105.
[52]
A. Dobrovolsky, S. Sukrittanon, Y. Kuang, C. W. Tu, W. M. Chen, I. A. Buyanova, Small, 2014, 10, 4403-4408.
[53]
W. Walukiewicz, J.W. Shan, W. Ager Ⅲ, D. R. Chamberlin, E. E. Haller, J. F. Geisz, D. J. Friedman, J. M. Olson, S. R. Kurtz, Electrochem. Soc. Proceedings Vol. 99-11, Seattle, WA, USA, 1999, 190-199.