催化学报  2020, Vol. 41 Issue (1): 31-40      DOI: S1872-2067(19)63467-4   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Doudou Ren
Rongchen Shen
Zhimin Jiang
Xinyong Lu
Xin Li
Highly efficient visible-light photocatalytic H2 evolution over 2D-2D CdS/Cu7S4 layered heterojunctions
Doudou Rena,b,†, Rongchen Shena,b,†, Zhimin Jianga,b, Xinyong Lua,b, Xin Lia,b     
a. College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Key Laboratory of Energy Plants Resource and Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China;
b. College of Materials and Energy, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, Guangdong, China
* Corresponding author. Xin Li, Tel: +86-20-85282633; Fax: +86-20-85285596; E-mail: Xinliscau@yahoo.com
† Doudou Ren and Rongchen Shen contributed equally to this work
X. Li would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21975084, 51672089), Special Funding on Applied Science and Technology in Guangdong (2017B020238005), the State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Material Synthesis and Processing (Wuhan University of Technology) (2015-KF-7), State Scholarship Fund of China Scholarship Council (200808440114), and the Ding Ying Talent Project of South China Agricultural University for their support
Abstract: Converting solar energy into clean and sustainable chemical fuels is a promising strategy for exploiting renewable energy. The application of photocatalytic water splitting technology in hydrogen production is important for sustainable energy development and environmental protection. In this study, for the first time, 2D Cu7S4 co-catalysts were coupled on the surface of a CdS nanosheet photocatalyst by a one-step ultrasonic-assisted electrostatic self-assembly method at room temperature. The as-fabricated 2D-2D CdS/Cu7S4 layered heterojunctions were demonstrated to be advanced composite photocatalysts that enhance the water splitting efficiency toward hydrogen production. The highest hydrogen evolution rate of the 2D-2D CdS/2%Cu7S4 binary heterojunction photocatalyst was up to 27.8 mmol g-1 h-1 under visible light irradiation, with an apparent quantum efficiency of 14.7% at 420 nm, which was almost 10.69 times and 2.65 times higher than those of pure CdS nanosheets (2.6 mmol g-1 h-1) and CdS-2%CuS (10.5 mmol g-1 h-1), respectively. The establishment of the CdS/Cu7S4 binary-layered heterojunction could not only enhance the separation of photogenerated electron-hole (e--h+) pairs, improve the transfer of photo-excited electrons, and prolong the life-span of photo-generated electrons, but also enhance the light absorption and hydrogen-evolution kinetics. All these factors are important for the enhancement of the photocatalytic activity. Expectedly, the 2D-2D interface coupling strategy based on CdS NSs can be extensively exploited to improve the hydrogen-evolution activity over various kinds of conventional semiconductor NSs.
© 2020, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Visible-light photocatalytic H2 evolution    CdS nanosheet    Cu7S4 cocatalysts    Layered heterojunction    Charge separation    
2D-2D CdS/Cu7S4层状异质结高效可见光光催化产氢
任豆豆a,b,†, 沈荣晨a,b,†, 姜志民a,b, 鲁信勇a,b, 李鑫a,b     
a. 华南农业大学林学与风景园林学院, 农业部能源植物资源与利用重点实验室, 广东广州 510642;
b. 华南农业大学材料与能源学院, 广东广州 510642
摘要:利用太阳能将水转化为清洁可持续的化学燃料是一种很有前途的策略.光催化水分解制氢技术是有效解决能源可持续发展和环境保护问题的重要技术.CdS由于具有较窄的带隙(2.4eV)和合适的能带位置而被认为是最有潜力的光催化水产氢催化剂之一.然而,CdS强光的腐蚀性和快速的电子空穴复合导致光催化剂活性低、稳定性差,严重阻碍了CdS光催化剂的广泛应用.为了有效提高光催化产氢活性及稳定性,人们对CdS光催化剂进行了大量改性研究.其中,合理巧妙地加载助催化剂和构造纳米结构CdS被认为是两种极为重要的改性策略,两种策略的有效耦合可以更有效地利用太阳能,实现清洁氢燃料的生成.一方面,各种形貌的CdS光催化剂均已被开发,例如纳米线、纳米棒、纳米片和量子点等.然而,由于制备工艺复杂,在以往的报道中很少有超薄2D CdS纳米片用于光催化产氢.另一方面,由于贵金属(Ag,Pt,Au)的稀缺性和高成本阻碍了其修饰光催化剂的实际应用,所以利用非贵金属助催化剂(MoSx,CuS,Ni3C,WS2,NiS,MXene,CoxP和MoP)修饰CdS提高光催化产氢活性近年来备受关注.对于地球丰富的2D层状助催化剂Cu7S4而言,具有优异的光电催化产氢活性和简单制备方法,但是在光催化产氢领域的应用上未引起足够重视.因此,本文充分利用超薄CdS纳米片以及Cu7S4纳米片各自的独特优势,构建了独特的2D-2D层状异质结,实现了高效协同光催化产氢.我们首先以乙酸镉和硫脲为原料通过一步水热法合成了超薄2D CdS纳米片,并用静电自组装方法制备了CdS/Cu7S4.在可见光下进行了产氢测试,实验结果证实了优化的2D CdS/2% Cu7S4层状异质结在含有Na2S·9H2O和Na2SO3的水溶液中光催化析氢活性最高(27.8 mmol g-1 h-1),是原始CdS纳米片(2.6 mmol g-1 h-1)的10.69倍.经过4次连续循环反应,CdS/Cu7S4二元复合体系展现出良好的稳定性.为深入探讨高效产氢机制,对纳米级CdS复合材料的光催化物化性能及载流子分离机制进行了表征.通过X射线衍射确定了CdS和CdS/Cu7S4的晶体结构.用高分辨电子显微镜和X射线光电子能谱证实合成了CdS催化剂和Cu7S4助催化剂的超薄纳米片结构且成功复合.用紫外-可见漫反射光谱法对制备的纯CdS和CdS/Cu7S4复合样品的光吸收特性进行了表征.结果表明,在CdS上负载Cu7S4以后,可以明显观察到样品对可见光的吸收能力明显增强.对CdS/Cu7S4进行XPS测试分析,进一步证明了样品中S、Cd和Cu的化学成分和状态.利用PL发射光谱研究了CdS/Cu7S4光催化剂的电荷载流子复合和转移行为.进一步对纯CdS和CdS/Cu7S4复合光催化剂的瞬态光电流响应(I-t曲线)进行了研究,确定了光生载体的分离效率.阻抗是深入研究电荷载流子迁移和界面转移的最有力技术,利用阻抗技术证实CdS/Cu7S4界面高效的载流子分离性能.极化曲线结果表明,加入Cu7S4可以降低CdS的产氢过电势,因此加速表面产氢动力学.由此可见,本文所构建的2D-2D CdS/Cu7S4二元层状异质结可以同时实现光生电子空穴对的快速分离、电子的转移和增加光生电子在表面利用效率,从而最大幅度地提高其光催化水分解产氢活性.本文所采用基于CdS纳米片的2D-2D界面耦合策略可以作为一种通用策略扩展到各种传统半导体纳米片的改性,从而极大地推进高效光催化产氢材料的持续进步.
关键词可见光光催化产氢    CdS纳米片    Cu7S4助催化剂    层状异质结    载流子分离    

1 Introduction

Hydrogen, which can be applied in generating abundant clean and renewable green energy, has attracted significant attention amidst the growing energy and environmental pollution crisis [1]. Photocatalytic H2 production from water splitting has proved to be an environmentally friendly strategy for generating renewable solar energy, with the advantages of replacing fossil fuels and reducing environmental pollution [2, 3]. CdS, with a special band gap of 2.4 eV and an appropriate band level, has long been considered as a promising photocatalyst [4, 5]. However, the strong photocorrosion of CdS photocatalysts and the rapid combination of the e–h+ pairs lead to their low activity and poor stability, thus hindering their wide application [6, 7]. Therefore, to improve the separation of the e–h+ pairs and photocatalytic activity and stability, extensive modification studies have been carried out to boost the photocatalytic hydrogen production over CdS photocatalysts [8, 9], such as the construction of heterogeneous junctions [2, 10-13], co-catalyst loading [14-20], the design of Z-type systems [21-28], coupling with nanocarbon materials [9, 29-31], and the exploration of nanostructures [10, 14, 17, 32-40]. Typically, loading co-catalyst over nanostructured CdS photocatalysts is one of the most effective and convenient methods of improving their catalytic activity toward hydrogen production [41]. In previous researches, various morphologies of CdS photocatalysts such as nanorods [17, 34, 35, 37, 42, 43], quantum dots [44], nanosheets [45, 46], and nanowires [47] have been widely studied. However, there are few reports on the use of ultra-thin 2D CdS as a photocatalyst in hydrogen production [48], due to the difficult preparation process of 2D CdS nanosheets. In particular, it is still challenging to achieve large-scale and practical photocatalytic hydrogen generation over 2D nanostructured CdS using proper co-catalysts.

At present, the development and study of earth-abundant co-catalysts are imperative due to the low natural abundance and high cost of precious metals (Ag, Pt, Au) [3, 49]. Thus far, various low-cost co-catalysts such as MoSx [10, 15, 33, 50-54], CoMoSx [55], WS2 [56, 57], NiS [58-60], CuS [61, 62], Ni3C [63], MXene [52], CoxP [64, 65], and MoP [65] have been immensely employed to enhance the hydrogen-production activity of CdS. Interestingly, owing to the simple preparation method, the earth-abundant Cu7S4 nanocrystals have aroused extensive interest in the fields of electrocatalysis and photocatalysis. Although Cu7S4 has also been exploited in different photocatalytic applications, it is principally concentrated on degradation organics [66-69] and photothermal applications [70]. Notably, previous researches on Cu7S4 nanocrystals involved using them only as templates or semiconductors, rather than as co-catalysts. Evidently, the studies on Cu7S4-based hydrogen-evolution co-catalysts are quite limited [71, 72].

In this work, 2D Cu7S4 NSs were initially used as co-catalysts in photocatalytic hydrogen production. The limitations of both Cu7S4 and CdS can be overcome by constructing a 2D–2D-layered heterojunction. In this study, ultra-thin 2D Cu7S4 and CdS nanosheets were synthesized by direct precipitation and a simple one-step hydrothermal method, respectively (as shown in Scheme 1). Consequently, we prepared 2D noble-metal-free Cu7S4 modified CdS nanosheet photocatalysts and intensively explored their pivotal role in enhancing the hydrogen evolution reaction. Notably, the optimally obtained CdS/Cu7S4 NSs demonstrate enhanced stability, high light harvesting, and enhanced activity toward photocatalysis in Na2S–Na2SO3 solution. The highest hydrogen production rate was 27.8 mmol g–1 h–1 at ambient temperature. The excellent photocatalytic activity is mainly attributed to the ability of the loaded 2D Cu7S4 co-catalysts to significantly suppress e–h+ recombination, enhance conductivity, accelerate electron transfer, and enhance light absorption.

Scheme 1. Schematic diagram of the fabrication of CdS/Cu7S4 composites
2 Experimental
2.1 Materials

All the chemicals were of analytical grade and were used directly without further purification, including thiourea (CH4N2S), cadmium acetate (C4H6CdO4), ethylenediamine (EDA), copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO4·5H2O), sodium sulfide nonahydrate (Na2S·9H2O), and sodium sulfite (Na2SO3).

2.2 Synthesis methods

The CdS NSs were synthesized by a facile one-step hydrothermal method [48]. First, 0.5330 g of C4H6CdO4 and 0.4567 g of CH4N2S were added into the beaker containing 60 mL of EDA. EDA acts as a solvent and structure-directing compound in CdS synthesis [73]. Prior to transferring the suspension into a 100 mL Teflon-lined autoclave, the solution was stirred for 40 min, followed by heating at 100 ℃ for 8 h. The yellowish solid precipitate was collected through centrifugation at 9000 rpm for 10 min, after which it was washed with water and ethanol five times, severally. Finally, the product was dried in a vacuum oven.

CuSO4·5H2O (0.5 g) was added to a beaker containing 50 mL of distilled water, while 0.48 g of Na2S·9H2O and 0.25 g of Na2SO3 were added to another beaker containing 50 mL of distilled water, followed by stirring for 30 min. Thereafter, Na2S·9H2O and Na2SO3 solutions were added dropwise to the CuSO4·5H2O solution under continuous agitation (pH ~8.5), and a black precipitate was formed. The solution was stirred continuously for 12 h. The black precipitates were collected by centrifugation at 9000 rpm for 6 min and washed with water and ethanol three times, severally. Finally, the product was dried in a vacuum oven for 10 h.

Binary CdS/Cu7S4 was prepared by a simple electrostatic self-assembly method. Firstly, 8 mg of Cu7S4 was dispersed in 30 mL of distilled water (pH ~7.0) and dispersed by ultrasonication for 90 min at room temperature. Subsequently, 392 mg of CdS NSs was mixed with the suspension and subjected to ultrasonication for 2 h. Afterward, the solution was stirred for 10 h. Finally, CdS/2%Cu7S4 was obtained by centrifugation and washed two times with water and ethanol, severally. The other binary composites with varying proportions of Cu7S4 were prepared by this procedure.

2.3 Characterization

Within the scope of 10°–80°, the structure diffraction peaks of CdS and CdS/Cu7S4 were recorded using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, XD-2X/M4600 with Cu kα radiation). The UV-vis absorption spectrum was determined using a Daojin (Japan) UV-2600 PC spectrophotometer at 200–800 nm. TEM (transmission electron microscopy) and HRTEM (high-resolution TEM) images of the samples were obtained by FEI Talos F200s 200 kV STEM. XPS spectra were obtained using a K-Alpha+ elemental analysis system. The Daojin RF-5301PC (Japan) instrument, with an excitation wavelength of 398 nm, was used to record the photoluminescence (PL) spectra at room temperature.

2.4 Photocatalytic reaction procedures

At standard atmospheric pressure and room temperature, the photocatalytic experiment was performed in a three-neck flask (flat bottom) with a volume of 100 mL. To simulate solar radiation, a Xe lamp (300 W) served as the source of visible light. In a typical experiment, the as-prepared photocatalyst (5 mg) was placed in the prepared 80 mL sacrificial agent solution (0.25 mol/L Na2S·9H2O-Na2SO3). Subsequently, the suspension was uniformly dispersed by ultrasonication for 30 min and purified with N2 for 30 min to ensure removal of dissolved oxygen. After initiation of irradiation, 400 μL of gas from the three flasks was injected into the gas chromatograph (GC-9560) at hourly intervals for analysis.

2.5 Electrochemical tests

For the preparation of the working electrode, 5 mg of the photocatalyst and 20 μL of Nafion (0.25%) solution were added to 2 mL of ethanol solution, followed by ultrasonication for 2 h. A portion (500 μL) of the suspension was transferred to a fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO, 2 cm ×3.5 cm) glass substrate in 10 drops, and each dispersion was dried under the infrared lamp. The last step involved maintaining the FTO at 150 ℃ for 1 h under Ar protection.

Transient photocurrent experiments were performed using electrochemical workstations and standard three-electrode batteries. Ag/AgCl, the prepared working electrode, Pt electrode, and 0.1 mol/L Na2SO4 were used as the reference electrode, working electrode, counter electrode, and electrolyte, respectively. The irradiation light source was a 300 W Xe lamp.

The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of the above-mentioned working electrodes in a three-electrode system was recorded via a computer-controlled electrochemical workstation. The frequency was in the range of 0.01–105 Hz; the electrolyte solution contained 0.02 mol/L Na2SO4 and 0.1 mol/L Na2S, and the AC amplitude was 5 mV.

The electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution was measured at 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 with the standard three electrodes. The reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE), a Pt flake, and a glassy carbon electrode were the reference electrode, counter electrode, and working electrode, respectively.

3 Results and discussion
3.1 The structures and compositions of the photocatalysts

To determine the crystal structures of Cu7S4 and CdS/Cu7S4, the typical XRD patterns were recorded (Fig. 1). As shown in Fig. 1a, the diffraction peaks of Cu7S4 were mainly concentrated in the 29.0, 32.2, 35.3, 37.8, 46.2, 54.9, 59.6, 67.3, and 68.8°, which were assigned to the (113), (220), (031), (302), (224), (026), (051), (440), and (108) crystal planes in the card of Cu7S4 (PDF# 33-0489), respectively, indicating the high purity of the as-prepared Cu7S4. In addition, the peaks can be observed in Fig. 1b at 24.8°, 26.5°, 28.2°, 36.6°, 43.7°, 47.8°, and 51.8°, which can be assigned to the (100), (002), (101), (102), (110), (103), and (112) diffraction planes of 2D CdS (JCPDS 41-1049), respectively. The results fully confirmed the synthesis of well-crystallized 2D CdS NSs. However, the peaks of Cu7S4 were not observed in the XRD spectra of the CdS/Cu7S4 composites, which is possibly due to the high dispersion and low content of Cu7S4. The existence of Cu7S4 in CdS/Cu7S4 needs to be further verified by TEM and other tests.

Fig. 1. XRD spectra of (a) Cu7S4 and (b) the hybrid CdS/Cu7S4

As shown in Fig. 2, to determine the morphologies and microstructures of the as-prepared Cu7S4, CdS, and CdS/Cu7S4, TEM and HRTEM were performed. Evidently, from Fig. 2a, the microstructure of CdS is almost transparent, which proves that CdS has a 2D ultrathin nano-sheet structure. As can be observed in Fig. 2b, Cu7S4 also exhibits the 2D thin-layer nanostructure. Subsequently, we observed and analyzed the binary composites by TEM, and the images are displayed in Figs. 2c and 2d. From Fig. 2e, it can be observed that the interplanar spacings of 0.33 nm and 0.25 nm correspond to the (002) plane in CdS (JCPDS 41-1409) and the (224) plane in Cu7S4 (JCPDS 33-0489), respectively. By comparing Figs. 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, and 2e, it is evident that the Cu7S4 NSs were evenly dispersed on the CdS NSs. Compared with those of the 0D–1D, 1D–2D, 0D–2D, and 1D–1D interfaces, the 2D–2D interface has a larger contact area, provides more electron transfer and capture channels, inhibits e–h+ recombination, and improves the efficiency of the photocatalysts [74]. Therefore, the construction of 2D CdS/Cu7S4 coupling and its large specific surface area are considered to be the most prominent advantages of accelerating the e–h+ pairs separation and increasing hydrogen production active sites in this study. In addition, as shown in Fig. 3, elemental mapping was conducted on CdS/Cu7S4 to determine the distribution of elements in the sample. The EDX peaks of Cd, S, and Cu in CdS/Cu7S4 can be clearly seen in Fig. 3, which effectively confirms the existence of Cu7S4 in CdS. The existence and uniform distribution of elements S, Cu, and Cd completely confirm the 2D–2D binary coupling morphology. From the above analysis and discussion, it can be inferred that CdS/Cu7S4, a 2D–2D layered heterojunction, has been successfully prepared.

Fig. 2. TEM images of (a) CdS, (b) Cu7S4, and (c, d) CdS/Cu7S4, and (e) HRTEM image of CdS/Cu7S4
Fig. 3. EDX spectra of CdS-2%Cu7S4 (a) and elemental mapping (b–f)

XPS analysis of CdS-2%Cu7S4 was performed to further confirm the states and chemical compositions of S, Cd, and Cu in the sample. The measured XPS spectrum (Fig. 4) of CdS-2%Cu7S4 shows the position of the main peaks of each element, confirming the existence of chemical elements Cd, Cu, and S. As can be observed in Fig. 4b, two peaks, 404.2 and 411.7 eV, appear in the high-resolution spectrum of Cd 3d with a peak spacing of 7.5 eV, which is attributed to the fact that Cd 3d3/2 and Cd 3d5/2 were the main sources of Cd2+ in the CdS nanosheets. Moreover, the characteristic peaks of Cu 2p at the 933.4 and 953.2 eV positions, with a peak spacing of 19.8 eV, were clearly observed in Fig. 4c, and were assigned to the Cu 2p3/2 and Cu 2p1/2 peaks of Cu+, respectively. Meanwhile, the peaks of S 2p were determined at 161.7 and 163.0 eV, with a splitting energy of 1.3 eV, which correspond to the sulfides in Cu7S4 and CdS, respectively. The above results strongly illustrate the coexistence of CdS and Cu7S4.

Fig. 4. XPS scan of (a) CdS-2%Cu7S4, (b) Cd 3d, (c) Cu 2p, and (d) S 2p
3.2 Optical properties, activity, and stabilities of the photocatalysts

In general, photocatalytic reactions depend mainly on the position of the band edge and the ability of light absorption. To gain information on the absorbance, the samples were analyzed using a UV spectrophotometer (Fig. 5a). As shown in Fig. 5a, the visible light absorption edge of the prepared photocatalyst was around 500 nm, with a strong visible light absorption ability. After loading Cu7S4 on CdS, it can be clearly observed that the absorption capacity of the samples toward visible light was notably enhanced. Noticeably, after the loading of Cu7S4 on CdS, the absorption range of visible light was broadened, and the absorption capacity was enhanced notably.

Fig. 5. (a) UV-vis absorption spectra; (b) The average rate of hydrogen evolution; (c) Repeat time test for the photocatalyst; (d) Apparent quantum efficiency diagram for CdS-2%Cu7S4; (e) Reaction solution pH for electrostatic attraction

The hydrogen production activity of the prepared CdS/Cu7S4 was verified in the Na2S-Na2SO3 solution under visible light (> 420 nm) to explore the photocatalytic performance. Fig. 5b shows the relationship between the hydrogen production activities of different catalysts and time. Hydrogen generation cannot occur without a photocatalyst and irradiation, which indicates that these conditions are crucial. Intriguingly, the as-synthesized 2D CdS NSs exhibited better hydrogen production activity than those of the previously reported CdS nanorods and nanoparticles. Compared with that of the pristine CdS, the hydrogen emission of CdS-2%Cu7S4 is higher, which is mainly due to the synergistic effect between CdS and Cu7S4. The hydrogen production rate of CdS-2% Cu7S4 is about 27.8 mmol g–1 h–1, which is almost 10.69 times and 2.65 times higher than those of pure CdS (2.6 mmol g–1 h–1) and CdS-2%CuS (10.5 mmol g–1 h–1), respectively. The low hydrogen-producing activity of pure CdS was mainly due to the fact that electrons cannot be transferred rapidly; this, thus, leads to their rapid recombination with holes. The loading of Cu7S4 provides more active sites and accelerates the electron transfer, thus facilitating the achievement of an outstanding hydrogen-producing rate. Noticeably, 2D Cu7S4 has more active sites due to its ultrathin nanosheet structure, which accelerates electron transfer.

In addition, the shelf life and efficiency of the photocatalyst are important factors considered in determining the stability of the photocatalyst [75, 76]. Thus, the stability experiment of the photocatalyst against long-time irradiation (12 h) was carried out. As shown in Fig. 5c, after four cycles, the amount of generated hydrogen by CdS-2%Cu7S4 decreased slightly; thus, it exhibited high stability in Na2S-Na2SO3 solution. Each cycle was conducted for 3 h, and N2 was injected before the initiation of the next cycle to remove the hydrogen.

As shown in Fig. 5d, the apparent quantum efficiency (AQE) of CdS-2%Cu7S4 was further evaluated at incident light wavelengths of 420, 450, 500, and 550 nm. The AQE values of CdS-2%Cu7S4 at 420, 450, 500, and 550 nm were 14.7%, 12.3%, 9.6%, and 7.2%, respectively. The AQE values of the sample gradually decreased with the increase in the light wavelength, which implies that the light absorption performance influences the evolution of hydrogen. The above results show that the hydrogen evolution kinetics is related to the light absorption performance.

Furthermore, considering the isoelectric pH values of CdS and Cu7S4, as well as the reaction solution pH that might have favored the electrostatic attraction between them, we investigated the effect of the electrostatic attraction solution pH on the hydrogen production. As shown in Fig. 5e, in neutral and strong alkaline solutions, strong electrostatic adsorption ability is observed, which is beneficial for enhancing the hydrogen production efficiency.

3.3 Charge separation properties

To gain an in-depth understanding on the improvement of charge separation and transfer owing to the strong interface interaction between 2D CdS and the 2D Cu7S4 co-catalyst, the PL spectrum at the excitation wavelength of 398 nm was studied. Generally, the low PL peak intensity is related to efficient charge capture and separation [77-79]. As depicted in Fig. 6a, the PL spectra of CdS and CdS/Cu7S4 exhibit a similar emission trend, which is mainly due to the recombination of the e–h+ pairs in CdS. Further observation shows that the 2D–2D CdS/Cu7S4 layered heterojunction exhibits better light intensity quenching effect than that of pure CdS, which means that the formation of a 2D nano-heterojunction can effectively reduce the charge-carrier recombination rate. In fact, 2D Cu7S4 and 2D CdS were closely combined due to their large contact areas, which can significantly promote the charge migration and separation. All these results show that the 2D Cu7S4 co-catalyst supported on the surface of 2D CdS can effectively promote the separation and transfer of photo-excited charge, which is the key parameter for the measurement of photocatalytic performance [80, 81].

Fig. 6. (a) PL spectra, (b) transient photocurrent (I-t) curves, (c) EIS Nyquist plots, and (d) polarization curves

To further study the charge transfer and separation efficiency at the interface, I-t curves (the transient photocurrent response) of all the samples fixed on the FTO substrate were obtained in a 0.1 mol/L Na2SO4 solution. As indicated in Fig. 6b, noticeably, the photocurrent density of CdS NSs is lower than that of CdS-2%Cu7S4, indicating that loading 2D Cu7S4 on 2D CdS significantly enhanced the interface charge transfer. The enhanced photocurrent densities of binary two-dimensional composite materials imply the improvement of charge separation and transfer efficiency, which are critical factors for advancing the photocatalytic activity [82, 83].

The electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) is a convenient and valid method for exploring the e–h+ separation and interfacial charge transfer resistance [75, 84-86]. As shown in Fig. 6c, the EIS of CdS NSs and CdS-2%Cu7S4 were recorded in 0.1 mol/L Na2S and 0.02 mol/L Na2SO3 aqueous solutions. Compared with that of pure CdS, CdS-2%Cu7S4 shows a small arc, indicating the existence of a high electronic transmission rate between Cu7S4 NSs and CdS NSs. The appropriate proportion of the Cu7S4 load on CdS can effectively reduce the electron transfer obstruction, accelerate the electron transfer, and improve the efficiency of hydrogen production. To further highlight the crucial effect of the 2D Cu7S4 co-catalyst in promoting the photocatalytic evolution, the polarization curves of CdS NSs and CdS-2%Cu7S4 from –1.2 to 0.1 V vs NHE were obtained. Compared with that of CdS-2%Cu7S4, the pure CdS electrode in 0.5 mol/L H2SO4 exhibits a less ideal hydrogen evolution performance. Based on the photocatalytic mechanism, Cu7S4 NSs serve as the active sites of CdS NSs, which is a crucial factor in fortifying the hydrogen-evolution kinetics and decreasing the hydrogen-evolution overpotential, which can directly promote the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution [87, 88].

Based on the aforementioned analysis, the tentative mechanisms of charge transfer and visible-light hydrogen-evolution over the CdS/Cu7S4 NSs composites were proposed, as given in Scheme 2. Under exposure to irradiation, the electrons of CdS NSs were readily excited from their VB to CB, followed by combination with the H+ ions to produce hydrogen. However, the hydrogen production was hindered by the easy recombination of the e–h+ pairs in 2D CdS NSs. On the contrary, due to the high electric conductivity of the CdS/Cu7S4 composite photocatalyst, photogenerated e- could readily be transferred to 2D noble-metal-free Cu7S4 co-catalyst through the close interfacial contact between Cu7S4 NSs and CdS NSs, thus effectively separating the e–h+ pairs. Consequently, loading Cu7S4 NSs on the surface of CdS can significantly improve the photocatalytic hydrogen-evolution.

Scheme 2. Schematic diagram of the photocatalytic hydrogen-evolution over the binary CdS/Cu7S4 photocatalyst
4 Conclusions

2D–2D CdS/Cu7S4 binary-layered heterojunction photocatalysts were synthesized by the self-assembly method. The results demonstrated that the as-prepared CdS-2%Cu7S4 composite exhibited the highest photocatalytic hydrogen-evolution rates of 27.8 mmol g–1 h–1 in 0.25 mol/L Na2S-Na2SO3, which were 10.69 times higher than that of pure CdS NSs. The corresponding AQEs reached 14.8% at 420 nm even with the noble-metal-free co-catalyst. The enhanced activity can be attributed to the loading of Cu7S4 NSs and coupling of the 2D–2D interfaces, which effectively promoted the separation of charge carriers and improved the surface hydrogen-evolution kinetics over the 2D hybrid CdS/Cu7S4 layered heterojunctions. Hopefully, the 2D–2D interface coupling strategy based on CdS can become a general strategy for enhancing the hydrogen-evolution activity [89].

References
[1]
P. Kuang, T. Tong, K. Fan, J. Yu, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 6179-6187. DOI:10.1021/acscatal.7b02225
[2]
X. Zhou, Q. Gao, X. Li, Y. Liu, S. Zhang, Y. Fang, J. Li, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 10999-11005. DOI:10.1039/C5TA02516H
[3]
R. C. Shen, J. Xie, Q. J. Xiang, X. B. Chen, J. Z. Jiang, X. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 40, 240-288. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(19)63294-8
[4]
J. Z. Chen, X. J. Wu, L. S. Yin, B. Li, X. Hong, Z. X. Fan, B. Chen, C. Xue, H. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 1210-1214. DOI:10.1002/anie.201410172
[5]
Q. Li, B. Guo, J. Yu, J. Ran, B. Zhang, H. Yan, J. R. Gong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 10878-10884. DOI:10.1021/ja2025454
[6]
J. J. Zhou, R. Wang, X. L. Liu, F. M. Peng, C. H. Li, F. Teng, Y. P. Yuan, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 346, 278-283. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.210
[7]
H. Li, X. Q. Yan, B. Lin, M. Y. Xia, J. J. Wei, B. L. Yang, G. D. Yang, Nano Energy, 2018, 47, 481-493. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.026
[8]
L. Cheng, Q. Xiang, Y. Liao, H. Zhang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2018, 11, 1362-1391. DOI:10.1039/C7EE03640J
[9]
Q. Li, X. Li, S. Wageh, A.A. Al-Ghamdi, J. Yu, Adv. Energy Mater., 2015, 5, 1500010. DOI:10.1002/aenm.201500010
[10]
S. Ma, J. Xie, J. Wen, K. He, X. Li, W. Liu, X. Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 391, 580-591. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.067
[11]
Y. K. Zhang, Z. L. Jin, H. Yuan, G. R. Wang, B. Z. Ma, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 462, 213-225. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.081
[12]
D. Jiang, L. Zhu, R. M. Irfan, L. Zhang, P. Du, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 2102-2109. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62956-5
[13]
J. Z. Su, T. Zhang, L. Wang, J. W. Shi, Y. B. Chen, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 489-497. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62769-4
[14]
A. Meng, J. Zhang, D. Xu, B. Cheng, J. Yu, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 2016, 198, 286-294. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.074
[15]
Z. Li, Y. Yang, K. Dai, J. F. Zhang, L. H. Lu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 469, 505-513. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.078
[16]
F. Y. Chen, L. J. Zhang, X. W. Wang, R. B. Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 422, 962-969. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.214
[17]
W. Chen, Y. H. Wang, M. Liu, L. Gao, L. Q. Mao, Z. Y. Fan, W. F. Shangguan, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 444, 485-490. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.03.068
[18]
P. Wang, H. T. Li, Y. Sheng, F. Chen, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 463, 27-33. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.125
[19]
P. Wang, Y. Sheng, F. Z. Wang, H. G. Yu, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 2018, 220, 561-569. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.080
[20]
H. Yu, X. Huang, P. Wang, J. Yu, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120, 3722-3730. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b00126
[21]
A. Y. Meng, B. C. Zhu, B. Zhong, L. Y. Zhang, B. Cheng, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 422, 518-527. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.028
[22]
Y. Huang, Y. Liu, D. Y. Zhu, Y. N. Xin, B. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 13626-13635. DOI:10.1039/C6TA05400E
[23]
H. J. Cui, B. B. Li, Z. Y. Li, X. Z. Li, S. Xu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 455, 831-840. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.06.054
[24]
T. P. Hu, P. F. Li, J. F. Zhang, C. H. Liang, K. Dai, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 442, 20-29. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.146
[25]
Z. Zhao, Y. B. Xing, H. B. Li, P. Y. Feng, Z. C. Sun, Sci. China-Mater., 2018, 61, 851-860. DOI:10.1007/s40843-017-9170-6
[26]
S. Wang, B. C. Zhu, M. J. Liu, L. Y. Zhang, J. G. Yu, M. H. Zhou, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 2019, 243, 19-26. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.019
[27]
J. Low, B. Dai, T. Tong, C. Jiang, J. Yu, Adv. Mater., 2019, 31, 1802981. DOI:10.1002/adma.201802981
[28]
T. Di, Q. Xu, W. Ho, H. Tang, Q. Xiang, J. Yu, ChemCatChem, 2019, 11, 1394-1411. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201802024
[29]
Z. W. Chen, C. Feng, W. B. Li, Z. Y. Sun, J. Hou, X. B. Li, L. K. Xu, M. X. Sun, Y. Y. Bu, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 841-848. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62972-3
[30]
X. Li, R. Shen, S. Ma, X. Chen, J. Xie, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 430, 53-107. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.194
[31]
X. Li, J. Yu, S. Wageh, A.A. Al-Ghamdi, J. Xie, Small, 2016, 12, 6640-6696. DOI:10.1002/smll.201600382
[32]
C. B. Bie, J. W. Fu, B. Cheng, L. Y. Zhang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 462, 606-614. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.130
[33]
B. Chai, M. Q. Xu, J. T. Yan, Z. D. Ren, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 430, 523-530. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.292
[34]
S. Hong, D. P. Kumar, D. A. Reddy, J. Choi, T. K. Kim, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 396, 421-429. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.10.171
[35]
R. K. Chava, J. Y. Do, M. Kang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 433, 240-248. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.260
[36]
W. Kim, D. Monllor-Satoca, W. S. Chae, M. A. Mahadik, J. S. Jang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 463, 339-347. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.127
[37]
G. R. Wang, Z. L. Jin, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 467, 1239-1248.
[38]
X. Li, Y. Deng, Z. Jiang, R. Shen, J. Xie, W. Liu, X. Chen, J. Chem. Educ., 2019, 96, 1224-1229. DOI:10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00087
[39]
R. Shen, C. Jiang, Q. Xiang, J. Xie, X. Li, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 471, 43-87. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.205
[40]
X. Li, J. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2016, 45, 2603-2636. DOI:10.1039/C5CS00838G
[41]
L. Li, Z. Deng, L. Yu, Z. Lin, W. Wang, G. Yang, Nano Energy, 2016, 27, 103-113. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.054
[42]
J. Yuan, J. Wen, Q. Gao, S. Chen, J. Li, X. Li, Y. Fang, Dalton Trans., 2015, 44, 1680-1689. DOI:10.1039/C4DT03197K
[43]
J. Ran, J. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Green Chem., 2011, 13, 2708-2713. DOI:10.1039/c1gc15465f
[44]
S. M. Yin, J. Y. Han, Y. J. Zou, T. H. Zhou, R. Xu, Nanoscale, 2016, 8, 14438-14447. DOI:10.1039/C6NR00989A
[45]
J. H. Xiong, K. Q. Jing, J. H. Zou, S. J. Liang, L. Wu, Dalton Trans., 2017, 46, 13935-13942. DOI:10.1039/C7DT03027D
[46]
Q. Xiang, B. Cheng, J. Yu, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 2013, 138, 299-303.
[47]
J. Jin, J. Yu, G. Liu, P. K. Wong, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2013, 1, 10927-10934. DOI:10.1039/c3ta12301d
[48]
S. Ma, X. M. Xu, J. Xie, X. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 1970-1980. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62965-6
[49]
X. Li, J. Yu, M. Jaroniec, X. Chen, Chem. Rev., 2019, 119, 3962-4179. DOI:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00400
[50]
Y. G. Lei, J. H. Hou, F. Wang, X. H. Ma, Z. L. Jin, J. Xu, S. X. Min, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 420, 456-464. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.165
[51]
J. Li, Y. Peng, X. H. Qian, J. Lin, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 452, 437-442. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.021
[52]
R. Chen, P. F. Wang, J. Chen, C. Wang, Y. H. Ao, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 473, 11-19. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.071
[53]
Z. W. Zhang, Q. H. Li, X. Q. Qiao, D. F. Hou, D. S. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2019, 40, 371-379. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(18)63178-X
[54]
D. Lang, T. T. Shen, Q. J. Xiang, ChemCatChem, 2015, 7, 943-951. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201403062
[55]
W. J. Liu, X. F. Wang, H. G. Yu, J. G. Yu, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 12436-12445. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b02971
[56]
H. M. Wang, C. H. Li, L. Ying, P. F. Fang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 448, 539-546. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.04.153
[57]
Q. J. Xiang, F. Y. Cheng, D. Lang, ChemSusChem, 2016, 9, 996-1002. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201501702
[58]
W. Zhang, Y. B. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. Y. Zhong, R. Xu, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 7631-7633. DOI:10.1039/c0cc01562h
[59]
J. L. Yuan, J. Q. Wen, Y. M. Zhong, X. Li, Y. P. Fang, S. S. Zhang, W. Liu, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 18244-18255. DOI:10.1039/C5TA04573H
[60]
N. X. Li, H. L. Huang, R. Bibi, Q. H. Shen, R. Ngulube, J. C. Zhou, M. C. Liu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 476, 378-386. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.105
[61]
F. Cheng, H. Yin, Q. Xiang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 391, 432-439. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.169
[62]
F. Y. Cheng, Q. J. Xiang, RSC. Adv., 2016, 6, 76269-76272. DOI:10.1039/C6RA16076J
[63]
S. Ma, Y. P. Deng, J. Xie, K. L. He, W. Liu, X. B. Chen, X. Li, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 2018, 227, 218-228. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.031
[64]
S. S. Li, L. Wang, S. Liu, B. R. Xu, N. Xiao, Y. Q. Gao, W. Y. Song, L. Ge, J. Liu, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 9940-9950. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01190
[65]
B. J. Ma, R. S. Zhang, K. Y. Lin, H. X. Liu, X. Y. Wang, W. Y. Liu, H. J. Zhan, Chin. J. Catal., 2018, 39, 527-533. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62931-0
[66]
Y. Jiang, S. Zhang, Q. Ji, J. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Z. Wang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2, 4574-4579. DOI:10.1039/C3TA14838F
[67]
Y. H. Chiu, Y. J. Hsu, Nano Energy, 2017, 31, 286-295. DOI:10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.036
[68]
S. D. Sun, X. P. Song, D. C. Deng, X. Z. Zhang, Z. M. Yang, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2012, 2, 1309-1314. DOI:10.1039/c2cy20107k
[69]
X. Li, J. Cao, L. L. Yang, M. B. Wei, X. Y. Liu, Q. Y. Liu, Y. Z. Hong, Y. Zhou, J. H. Yang, Dalton Trans., 2019, 48, 2442-2454. DOI:10.1039/C8DT04097D
[70]
X. Zhou, J. Jin, X. Zhu, J. Huang, J. Yu, W.-Y. Wong, W.-K. Wong, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 5282-5287. DOI:10.1039/C6TA00325G
[71]
M. M. Zhang, Z. L. Chen, Y. Wang, J. F. Zhang, X. R. Zheng, D. W. Rao, X. P. Han, C. Zhong, W. B. Hu, Y. D. Deng, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 2019, 246, 202-210. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.042
[72]
J. Y. Chu, X. J. Han, Z. Yu, Y. C. Du, B. Song, P. Xu, ACS Appl. MateInterfaces r., 2018, 10, 20404-20411. DOI:10.1021/acsami.8b02984
[73]
P. Li, C. Hou, X. Zhang, Y. Chen, T. He, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 459, 292-299. DOI:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.002
[74]
J. Low, S. Cao, J. Yu, S. Wageh, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 10768-10777. DOI:10.1039/C4CC02553A
[75]
R. C. Shen, J. Xie, H. D. Zhang, A. P. Zhang, X. B. Chen, X. Li, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 816-826. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03169
[76]
Y. Zhong, J. Yuan, J. Wen, X. Li, Y. Xu, W. Liu, S. Zhang, Y. Fang, Dalton Trans., 2015, 44, 18260-18269. DOI:10.1039/C5DT02693H
[77]
Z. K. Yue, A. J. Liu, C. Y. Zhang, J. Huang, M. S. Zhu, Y. K. Du, P. Yang, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 2017, 201, 202-210. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.08.028
[78]
J. Di, J. X. Xia, X. W. Li, M. X. Ji, H. Xu, Z. G. Chen, H. M. Li, Carbon, 2016, 107, 1-10. DOI:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.05.028
[79]
K. He, J. Xie, Z. Yang, R. Shen, Y. Fang, S. Ma, X. Chen, X. Li, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2017, 7, 1193-1202. DOI:10.1039/C7CY00029D
[80]
M. S. Zhu, C. Y. Zhai, M. Fujitsuka, T. Majima, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 2018, 221, 645-651. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.09.063
[81]
W. Cui, J. Y. Li, W. L. Cen, Y. J. Sun, S. C. Lee, F. Dong, J. Catal., 2017, 352, 351-360. DOI:10.1016/j.jcat.2017.05.017
[82]
H. Zhao, Y. M. Dong, P. P. Jiang, H. Y. Miao, G. L. Wang, J. J. Zhang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 7375-7381. DOI:10.1039/C5TA00402K
[83]
J. P. Zou, L. C. Wang, J. M. Luo, Y. C. Nie, Q. J. Xing, X. B. Luo, H. M. Du, S. L. Luo, S. L. Suib, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 2016, 193, 103-109. DOI:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.04.017
[84]
J. Q. Wen, J. Xie, H. D. Zhang, A. P. Zhang, Y. J. Liu, X. B. Chen, X. Li, ACS Appl. MateInterfaces r., 2017, 9, 14031-14042. DOI:10.1021/acsami.7b02701
[85]
K. He, J. Xie, Z.-Q. Liu, N. Li, X. Chen, J. Hu, X. Li, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 13110-13122. DOI:10.1039/C8TA03048K
[86]
K. L. He, J. Xie, X. Y. Luo, J. Q. Wen, S. Ma, X. Li, Y. P. Fang, X. C. Zhang, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 240-252. DOI:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62759-1
[87]
X. B. Wei, C. L. Shao, X. H. Li, N. Lu, K. X. Wang, Z. Y. Zhang, Y. C. Liu, Nanoscale, 2016, 8, 11034-11043. DOI:10.1039/C6NR01491G
[88]
Y. P. Liu, G. D. Li, L. Yuan, L. Ge, H. Ding, D. J. Wang, X. X. Zou, Nanoscale, 2015, 7, 3130-3136. DOI:10.1039/C4NR06295G
[89]
S. K. Muduli, E. Varrla, Y. Xu, S. A. Kulkarni, A. Katre, S. Chakraborty, S. Chen, T. C. Sum, R. Xu, N. Mathews, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 24874-24879. DOI:10.1039/C7TA04889K