催化学报  2020, Vol. 41 Issue (6): 970-976      DOI: S1872-2067(19)63515-1   PDF    
扩展功能
加入收藏夹
复制引文信息
加入引用管理器
Email Alert
RSS
本文作者相关文章
Md. Nurnobi Rashed
Abeda Sultana Touchy
Chandan Chaudhari
Jaewan Jeon
S. M. A. Hakim Siddiki
Toyao Takashi
Ken-ichi Shimizu
Selective C3-alkenylation of oxindole with aldehydes using heterogeneous CeO2 catalyst
Md. Nurnobi Rasheda, Abeda Sultana Touchya, Chandan Chaudharib, Jaewan Jeona, S. M. A. Hakim Siddikia, Toyao Takashia,c, Ken-ichi Shimizua,c     
a. Institute for Catalysis, Hokkaido University, N-21, W-10, Sapporo 001-0021, Japan;
b. Department of Chemical Systems Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan;
c. Elements Strategy Initiative for Catalysts and Batteries, Kyoto University, Katsura, Kyoto 615-8520, Japan
* Corresponding author. S. M. A. Hakim Siddiki, Fax: +81-11-706-9163; E-mail: hakim@cat.hokudai.ac.jp;
Ken-ichi Shimizu, E-mail: kshimizu@cat.hokudai.ac.jp
This study was supported financially by a series of JSPS KAKENHI grants:17H01341, 18K14051, 18K14057, and 19K05556 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and by the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) within the projects "Integrated Research Consortium on Chemical Sciences (IRCCS)" and "Elements Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research Center", as well as by the JST-CREST project JPMJCR17J3
Abstract: We report herein that a commercially available CeO2 is an active and reusable catalyst for the C3-selective alkenylation of oxindole with aldehydes under solvent-free conditions. This catalytic method is generally applicable to different aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes, giving 3-alkyledene-oxindoles in high yields (87%-99%) and high stereoselectivities (79%-93% to E-isomers). This is the first example of the catalytic synthesis of 3-alkenyl-oxindoles from oxindole and various aliphatic aldehydes. The Lewis acid-base interaction between Lewis acid sites on CeO2 and benzaldehyde was studied by in situ IR. The structure-activity relationship study using CeO2 catalysts with different sizes suggests that defect-free CeO2 surface is the active site for this reaction.
© 2020, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Key words: Oxindole    Aldehyde    Aldol condensation    C3-alkenylation    CeO2 catalyst    
多相CeO2催化剂上氧化吲哚与醛的选择性C3烯基化反应
Md. Nurnobi Rasheda, Abeda Sultana Touchya, Chandan Chaudharib, Jaewan Jeona, S. M. A. Hakim Siddikia, Takashi Toyaoa,c, Ken-ichi Shimizua,c     
a. 北海道大学催化科学研究所, N-21, W-10, 札幌001-0021, 日本;
b. 名古屋大学工程研究生院, 化学系统工程系, 名古屋464-8603, 日本;
c. 京都大学催化剂与电池元素战略基地, 桂校区, 京都615-8520, 日本
摘要:本文报道了将市售CeO2作为一种高活性和可重复使用的催化剂用于无溶剂条件下氧化吲哚与醛的C3选择性烷基化反应.这种催化方法一般适用于不同的芳香族和脂肪族醛,得到3-烷基二烯-辛醇,产率高(87%-99%),立体选择性高(79%-93%为E-异构体).这是从氧化吲哚与各种脂肪族醛催化合成3-烯基氧化吲哚的首例.采用原位红外光谱研究了CeO2上Lewis酸位点与苯甲醛之间的Lewis酸-碱相互作用.不同粒径CeO2催化剂的构效关系研究表明,无缺陷CeO2表面是该反应的活性中心.
关键词氧化吲哚        羟醛缩合    C3-烯基化    二氧化铈催化剂    

1 Introduction

Indoles, oxindoles, isatins, and their derivatives are relevant nitrogen-containing heterocycles widely distributed in natural products and pharmaceutical compounds [1]. Oxindole is used as a neurodepressant tryptophan metabolite and physiologically present in mammalian brain/blood, and can influence brain functions [2]. 3-Alkyledene-oxindole derivatives are medicinally important and exist in anticancer kinase inhibitors and anti-inflammatory drugs including Sunitinid and Tedinap, respectively [3-5]. They are also well-known synthetic intermediates of natural products named TMC-95, Gelsemine and biologically appealing spirooxindoles [6-13]. Conventionally, secondary amine (piperidine/pyrrolidine)-assisted Knoevenagel condensation reaction is applied to synthesize 3-alkyl/arylidene-oxindoles from oxindole and carbonyl compounds [14-17]. Lee et al. [18] reported (Z)-selective synthesis of 3-arylidene-oxindoles employing stoichiometric amounts of Ti(OiPr)4/pyridine with unsymmetrical ketones. Villemin et al. [19] reported 3-alkenylation of oxindole with aromatic aldehydes promoted by an excess amount (10 equiv.) of solid base (KF/Al2O3) under microwave radiation. Br nsted acidic ionic liquids [20] were reported to promote 3-alkenylation reactions of oxindole with aromatic aldehydes, but this method used an excess amount (> 6.6 equiv.) of the Br nsted acids with respect to the substrates. Apart from these non-catalytic methods, Vankelecom and co-workers [21] showed the catalytic synthesis of 3-benzylidene-oxindole by the reaction of oxindole with benzaldehyde using a Zr-incorporated UiO-66 MOF catalyst. Recently, Zhu and co-workers [22] reported that a homogeneous Re-complex catalyzed dehydrogenative 3-alkenylation of N-substituted oxindoles with benzylic alcohols. However, these two catalytic methods are applicable to activated (aromatic and allylic) aldehydes and suffer from the difficulties in catalyst reuse. Gholamzadeha et al. [23] demonstrated a reusable catalytic method using SO3H-loaded silica catalyst, but the method is applicable only for activated aromatic aldehydes. Hence, it is desirable to develop a reusable general heterogeneous catalyst for the 3-alkenylation of oxindoles with aldehydes including aliphatic (non-aromatic) aldehydes.

Organic synthesis employing heterogeneous CeO2 catalysis fascinates much attention in recent years [24-26]. Our group has studied a series of catalytic transformation of carboxylic acid derivatives using heterogeneous CeO2 catalysts [27-36]. This access has advantages combined with the facility of catalyst preparation and exploitation of a recyclable heterogeneous catalyst. It is anticipated that this catalytic system would find applications to other challenging reactions that produce value-added chemicals in one-pot manner. Herein, we report a simple heterogenous catalytic method using CeO2 for the C3-alkenylation of oxindole with aldehydes including unactivated aliphatic aldehydes into the corresponding 3-alkenyl-oxindoles.

2 Experimental
2.1 General

Commercial compounds (Tokyo Chemical Industry, Sigma-Aldrich or Wako Pure Chemical Industries) were used without further purification. Substrates and products were analyzed by GC (Shimadzu GC-2014) and GCMS (Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010) with an Ultra ALLOY+-1 capillary column (Frontier Laboratories Ltd.) using N2 and He as the carrier. Column chromatography was performed with silica gel 60 (spherical, 40-100 μm, Kanto Chemical Co. Ltd.). 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at ambient temperature on a JEOL-ECX 600 (1H: 600.17 MHz; 13C: 150.92 MHz) spectrometer with tetramethylsilane as an internal standard.

2.2 Catalyst preparation

CeO2 (JRC-CEO-1, 185.3 m2 g–1, supplied by Santoku Co.), MgO (JRC-MGO-3, 19 m2 g–1), and TiO2 (JRC-TIO-4, 47 m2 g–1) were obtained from Catalysis Society of Japan. SiO2 (Q-10, 300 m2 g–1) was supplied by Fuji Silysia Chemical Ltd. Different CeO2 catalysts were prepared with CeO2 (JRC-CEO-1) by calcining at four different temperatures (500, 600, 800, and 1000 ℃) for 3 h. γ-Al2O3 (124 m2 g–1) was prepared by calcination of γ-AlOOH (Catapal B Alumina purchased from Sasol) at 900 ℃ for 3 h. Niobic acid was supplied by CBMM, and Nb2O5 (54 m2 g–1) was prepared by calcination of the niobic acid at 500 ℃ for 3 h. ZrO2 (73 m2 g–1) and SnO2 (25 m2 g–1) were prepared by calcination (500 ℃, 3 h) of ZrO2nH2O and H2SnO3 (Kojundo Chemical Laboratory Co., Ltd.). Hydroxides of Ca, Zn, and Mg were commercially available. Hydroxides of La were prepared by hydrolysis of La(NO3)3·6H2O with aqueous NH4OH solution, followed by filtration, washing with distilled water, drying at 100 ℃ for 12 h, and calcination at 500 ℃ for 3 h. Oxides of Ca (22 m2 g–1), Zn (12 m2 g–1) and La were prepared by calcination of these hydroxides at 500 ℃ for 3 h. Hβ-20 (HSZ-940HOA, 530 m2 g–1) was purchased from Tosoh Co. A sulfonic resin (Amberlyst-15, 45 m2 g–1) and montmorillonite K10 clay (mont. K10, 220 m2 g–1) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Scandium(III) trifluoromethanesulfonate Sc(OTf)3, Ce(NO3)4, and Ce3(PO4)4 were purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry.

2.3 Catalytic tests

The solid catalysts, stored under ambient conditions, were used without any pretreatment. In a typical procedure, oxindole (1 mmol) and each of the aldehydes (1.25 mmol) were subjected to condensation reaction in the presence of 20 mg of catalysts. The reaction mixture was added to a reaction tube (Pyrex pressure tube, 13 mL), with a magnetic stirrer bar and placed in a heated reactor at 100 ℃ under N2 with stirring at 400 rpm. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was diluted with 2-propanol (3 mL), and n-dodecane (0.2 mmol) was added as an internal standard and the mixture was analyzed by GC-FID to determine the conversion and yield of the products. The GC-FID sensitivity of the product was determined using the isolated 3-alkeny-oxindole. After the reaction, the catalyst was separated through filtration, and the solvent was evaporated from the reaction mixture. The E/Z ratio of the isomers and total yield were determined by 1H NMR analyses of crude reaction mixture using mesitylene as an internal. The E and Z isomers were assigned and confirmed in comparison with their reported 1H NMR data [18]. The major product was isolated by column chromatography using silica gel 60 (spherical, 40-100 μm, Kanto Chemical Co. Ltd.) with hexane/ethyl acetate (95/5 to 80/20) as the eluting solvent. The isolated product was analyzed by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and GC-MS equipped with the same column as GC-FID.

2.4 Characterization

In situ IR spectra were recorded using a JASCO FT/IR-4200 spectrometer equipped with a mercury cadmium telluride detector. For the benzaldehyde adsorption IR study, a closed IR cell surrounded by a Dewar vessel was connected to an evacuation system. During the IR measurement, the IR cell was cooled with a freezing mixture of dry-ice/acetone in the Dewar vessel, and the thermocouple near the sample showed T = (–50 ± 5) ℃. The sample was pressed into a self-supporting wafer (40 mg) and mounted into the IR cell with CaF2 windows. Spectra were measured by accumulating 15 scans at a resolution of 4 cm–1. After in situ pre-evacuation of the sample at 500 ℃ for 0.5 h, a reference spectrum of the sample disc was measured at T = (–50 ± 5) ℃. The sample was then exposed to benzaldehyde (1 μL) under 650 Pa at T = –50 ℃ for 600 s, followed by evacuation for 600 s. A differential IR spectrum, with respect to the reference spectrum, was then recorded at T = (–50 ± 5) ℃. XRD measurements were conducted using a Rigaku Miniflex with a Cu-Kα radiation source. N2 adsorption measurements were carried out by using AUTOSORB 6AG (Yuasa Ionics Co.). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were carried out using a JEOL JPS-9010MC with an Mg Kα anode operated at 10 mA and 10 kV. Binding energies were calibrated with respect to C 1s at 284.2 eV.

3 Results and discussion
3.1 Optimization of the catalyst and reaction conditions

To find the optimal catalyst, we employed a series of potential catalysts for the 3-alkenylation of oxindole (1a) with benzaldehyde (2a) into the corresponding 3-benzylidene-oxindole product (3a). A series of acidic or basic heterogeneous and homogeneous catalysts (20 mg) were tested for the 3-alkenylation of 1a (1 mmol) and 2a (1.2 mmol) under N2 at 100 ℃ for 10 h. The conversions of 1a and the yield of 3a based on 1a using different catalysts are summarized in Table 1. Without catalyst (entry 1), only 4% yield of 3a was observed. Among the metal oxides (entries 2–11), CeO2 (entry 2) showed the highest yield of 3a (97%). Lewis acidic oxides including Nb2O5, TiO2, and ZrO2 gave 3a in good yields (54%–73%), and SiO2, SnO2, and amphoteric oxides Al2O3 and ZnO showed low yields of 3a (19%–32%). Basic oxides such as CaO, MgO, and La2O3 (entries 10–12) provided 3a in low yields (16%–27%). Commercially available solid acids, including proton-exchanged zeolite Hβ-20 (entry 13), montmorillonite K10 clay (entry 14), and a sulfonic resin Amberlyst-15 (entry 15), gave 3a in 15%–40% yields. Homogeneous Lewis acid Sc(OTf)3 (entry 16) afforded 3a in 52% yield. We also screened Ce salts (entries 17 and 18), Ce(NO3)4 and Ce3(PO4)4, which gave 3a in 57% and 49% yield, respectively. Screening test in Table 1 exhibits that CeO2 is the most effective catalyst for the 3-alkenylation of 1a with 2a.

Table 1
C3-alkenylation of oxindole with benzaldehyde by various catalysts

Admitting CeO2 as the best catalyst, we optimized the reaction conditions for the model 3-arenylation reaction as shown in Table 2. For the reaction at 80 ℃, the yield of 3a depends on the molar amount of 2a; the reaction with 1.25 equiv. of 2a gave higher yield (78%) than that with 1 equiv. of 2a (68%). The reactions of 1a with 1.25 equiv. of 2a at different temperatures (80–100 ℃) under solvent-free conditions were tested (entries 2–4). The reaction at 100 ℃ gave the highest yield of 3a (99%). The reactions of 1a with 1.25 equiv. of 2a at 100 ℃ in different solvents (entries 5–7) gave slightly lower yields (93%–96%) than the solvent-free conditions. Under the optimized conditions (100 ℃, 20 mg CeO2, 1 mmol 1a, and 1.25 mmol 2a), the time course of the reaction (Fig. 1) shows that a reaction time of 10 h was sufficient to obtain the maximum yield of 3a (99%).

Table 2
Optimization of the conditions for C3-alkenylation of oxindole with benzaldehyde
Fig. 1. Time course of the reaction of oxindole (1 mmol) with benzaldehyde (1.25 mmol) by CeO2 (20 mg) at 100 ℃
3.2 Catalytic performance

We studied the reusability of CeO2 for the alkenylation of 1a with 2a under the optimized conditions (Fig. 2). After completion of the reaction of each cycle, 2-propanol (3 mL) was added to the reaction mixture and CeO2 was separated by centrifugation, followed by consecutive washing with 2-propanol (3 mL) and acetone (3 mL), and drying at 110 ℃ for 6 h. The recovered catalyst was then used for the next reaction cycle. The result shows that the catalyst was reusable for five cycles with slight gradual decrease in the 3a yield (99%–92%). Initial product formation rates were examined (at conversion less than 30%) for each cycle in addition to the final yields (Fig. 2). A significant loss of the initial rate was not observed, but a slight decrease in the yield was observed. The yield was recovered after calcination of the CeO2 catalyst at 400 ℃ for 3 h. This indicates that the decrease in the final yield is not due to changes in the catalyst structure but due to carbonaceous compounds on the surface. The result in Fig. 2 shows that CeO2 is a robust heterogeneous catalyst. XRD pattern of the catalyst after the fifth cycle is nearly consistent with that of fresh catalyst (Fig. S1), which suggests no change in the catalyst structure after the reaction.

Fig. 2. Catalyst reuse for the synthesis of 3a from 1a and 2a, promoted by CeO2 catalysts under standard condition as shown in Table 1 (entry 2): (black bars) 3a yields after 10 h and (green bars) initial rates of 3a formation after 1 h

Under the optimized reaction conditions, we investigated the substrate scope for the C3-alkenylation of oxindole with various aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes by CeO2. The yields of alkylidene-oxindoles are shown in Scheme 1. Note that the yields of the major products (E isomers) were estimated from the weight of the isolated E isomers, while the total yields of E and Z isomers and the E/Z ratios in parenthesis were determined by 1H NMR. The benzaldehydes, including electron-donating (methyl, t-butyl, N, N-dimethyl, and methoxy at the para positions, 2b–2e; hydroxy at ortho position, 2f) and electron-withdrawing groups (chloride and nitro at the para positions, 2g and 2h) were successfully transformed into the corresponding 3-benzylidene-oxindoles (3a–3h) in high total yield (88%–99%). Regardless of the electronic nature, substrates with substituents at the para position selectively afford E isomers. Sterically congested substrate 2f with hydroxy group at the ortho position exceptionally formed Z isomer (84%, E/Z = 8:92, 3f) as a major product. Benzaldehyde homologue, i.e., 1-naphthaldehyde, is also well tolerated in this E-selective 3-arenylation reaction and affords high yield of 3-nepthalen-1-ylmethylene-oxindole (87%, E/Z = 93:7, 3i). Heteroaromatic aldehydes (e.g., isonicotinyl and furanyl groups) were successfully transformed into the corresponding 3-arylidene-oxindoles in high yield (90%, E/Z = 84:16, 3j; and 93%, E/Z = 85:15, 3k). An allylic aldehyde also underwent alkenylation to give 3-phenylallylidene-oxindole 3l in high yield and high E selectivity. Aliphatic aldehydes including linear and branched substituents at α-carbon atoms were successfully converted to the corresponding 3-alkelidene-oxindoles (3m–3p) in high yields and high E selectivity. To our knowledge, this is the first example of the catalytic C3-alkenylation of oxindole with aliphatic aldehydes.

Scheme 1. CeO2-catalyzed C3-alkenylation of oxindole with aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes (2a–2p) to synthesize the corresponding 3-alkyledene-oxindoles (3a–3p)

We also demonstrated the gram scale reaction for this CeO2-promoted 3-alkenyl-oxindole synthesis using different aldehydes (12.5 mmol) with 10 mmol of 1a and 20 mg of CeO2 catalysts. The yields of the corresponding 3-alkenyl-oxindole products are shown in Scheme 2. The reaction of 1a with benzaldehyde 2a, p-methyl-benzaldehyde 2b, p-chloro-benzal- dehyde 2g, isonicotinaldehyde 2j, and 1-octanal 2o gave the corresponding 3-alkenyl-oxindoles in 82%–93% yield.

Scheme 2. CeO2-catalyzed gram scale alkenylation of oxindole to produce corresponding 3-alkylidene-oxindoles
3.3 Active sites and possible mechanism

We prepared CeO2 catalysts calcined at four different temperatures (500, 600, 800, and 1000 ℃), and the structure and catalytic activity of these comparative catalysts were compared with the standard CeO2 catalyst (as received JRC-CEO-1), which was originally calcined at 300 ℃. X-ray diffraction patterns of the CeO2 catalysts (Fig. 3) show that the samples show the same crystal phase (fluorite structure). Average size of CeO2 crystals, calculated from the half-width of the peak at 28.5° using the Scherrer equation, was plotted versus calcination temperature in Fig. 5(B). The crystal size increases with the calcination temperature. The BET surface area (Table S1) estimated using the N2 adsorption isotherms (Fig. 4) is plotted in Fig. 5(B) as a function of calcination temperature. The surface area of the CeO2 catalysts decreased with the calcination temperature. We carried out catalytic tests for the standard reaction of 1a and 2a using these CeO2 catalysts to obtain the rates of 3a formation per catalyst weight (Table S1). As shown in Fig. 5(A), the rate per catalyst weight decreases with increase in the calcination temperature. The rates per catalyst weight were divided by the BET surface areas to give the rate per surface area. As shown in Fig. 5(A), the rate per surface area of the CeO2 catalysts increases with the calcination temperature. Clearly, the intrinsic catalytic activity of CeO2 increases with decrease in surface area of CeO2. This suggests that defect-free CeO2 surface, possibly the most stable (111) surface, is the active site for this alkenylation reaction.

Fig. 3. XRD patterns of different CeO2 catalysts calcined at different temperature, with particle sizes in parentheses
Fig. 4. N2 adsorption isotherms for different CeO2 catalysts calcined at different temperatures
Fig. 5. Effect of calcination temperature of CeO2 on (▲) the rate of 3a formation per catalyst weight, (●) rate of 3a formation per surface areas of CeO2, (□) crystal size of CeO2, and (■) BET surface area of CeO2. Reactions were performed under conditions where 1a conversions were below 30%

To check the presence of surface Ce3+, we studied X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis for CeO2 catalysts (Fig. 6). A strong peak due to Ce4+ species (918 eV) [37, 38] is observed in the Ce 3d XPS spectra for all the catalysts. A weak shoulder peak at 884 eV due to Ce3+ species [37, 38] is observed for the catalyst calcined at 300–800 ℃, but another characteristic peak for Ce3+ species at 904 eV is not clearly observed for these catalysts. These results suggest that Ce species in all the catalysts are basically in Ce4+ state and Ce3+ species are present at the surface as a minor Ce species.

Fig. 6. XPS results of CeO2 catalysts calcined at different temperatures

The high activity of CeO2 in the present reaction may be due to acid-base bifunctional properties [27, 35, 36] of CeO2 as shown in Scheme 3. First, we studied Lewis acid-base interaction between surface Ce cation and carbonyl oxygen of benzaldehyde using in situ IR experiment of benzaldehyde adsorbed on CeO2 (calcined at 300, 600, and 800 ℃) at –50 ℃ (Fig. 7). The benzaldehyde adsorbed on CeO2 catalysts gave the C=O stretching band at lower wavenumber (1682–1685 cm–1) than that on non-Lewis acidic oxide, SiO2 (1690 cm–1). The IR band intensity of the C=O stretching band slightly increases with calcination temperature, which is nearly the same for these three CeO2 catalysts. Considering that the surface area of CeO2 decreases with calcination temperature, the IR result suggests that the density of Lewis acid sites increases with calcination temperature. Hence, the steep increase in the catalytic activity from 600 to 800 ℃ in Fig. 5(A) may be due to the higher density of the Lewis acid sites. This indicates that Lewis acid-base interaction between the carbonyl group (Lewis base) and the Ce4+ Lewis acid site increases nucleophilicity of the adsorbed aldehyde on CeO2. We have previously shown that the basic sites of CeO2 are effective for aldol condensation of ketones to form α, β-unsaturated ketone [39]. In the present condensation reaction, the basic sites of CeO2 (i.e., surface oxygen atom) should abstract the proton of α-carbon to the carbonyl group in oxindole to give an enolate intermediate. Finally, nucleophilic attack of the enolate to the aldehyde activated over the Ce4+ site and subsequent dehydration results in the formation of the final product as illustrated in Scheme 3.

Scheme 3. Plausible reaction mechanism for the CeO2-catalyzed 3-alkenyation of oxindole with aldehydes
Fig. 7. IR spectra of benzaldehydes adsorbed on the SiO2 and CeO2 surface at –50 ℃ (t = 600 s)
4 Conclusions

CeO2 was found to be an efficient catalyst for synthesis of E selective 3-alkenyl-oxindoles from oxindole and aldehydes. The present method is the first general heterogeneous catalytic C3-selective alkenylation reaction of oxindole using both aromatic/aliphatic (unactivated) aldehydes. The study on the structure-activity relationship suggests that defect-free CeO2 surface, possibly the most stable (111) surface, is the active site for this alkenylation reaction. The specific catalysis of CeO2 in the present reaction can be due to its Lewis acid-base bifunctional property and where defect-free CeO2 surface is active site for this reaction.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to the technical division of the Institute for Catalysis (Hokkaido University) for manufacturing experimental equipment.

References
[1]
A. Millemaggi, R. J. K. Taylor, Eur. Org J. Chem., 2010, 4527-4547.
[2]
S. K. Suthar, S. Bansal, M. M. Alam, V. Jaiswal, A. Tiwari, A. Chaudhary, A. T. Alex, A. Joseph, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2015, 25, 5281-5285. DOI:10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.09.048
[3]
D. Bensinger, D. Stubba, A. Cremer, V. Kohl, T. Wa mer, J. Stuckert, V. Engemann, K. Stegmaier, K. Schmitz, B. Schmidt, Med J. Chem., 2019, 62, 2428-2446. DOI:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01714
[4]
A. Namil, M. Benoit-Guyod, G. LeClerc, Eur Med J. Chem., 1995, 30, 973-981. DOI:10.1016/0223-5234(96)88317-6
[5]
H. Wang, M. Chen, L. Wang, Chem. Pharm. Bull., 2007, 55, 1439-1441. DOI:10.1248/cpb.55.1439
[6]
S. Lin, Z. Q. Yang, B. H. B. Kwok, M. Koldobskiy, C. M. Crews, S. J. Danishefsky, Am J. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 6347-6355. DOI:10.1021/ja049821k
[7]
T. Fukuyama, G. Liu, Am J. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 7426-7427. DOI:10.1021/ja961701s
[8]
D. B. Ramachary, C. Venkaiah, P. M. Krishna, Org. Lett., 2013, 15, 4714-4717. DOI:10.1021/ol4020305
[9]
X. F. Huang, Z. M. Liu, Z. C. Geng, S. Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. W. Wang, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 8794-8799. DOI:10.1039/c2ob26205c
[10]
N. R. Ball-Jones, J. J. Badillo, A. K. Franz, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 5165-5181. DOI:10.1039/c2ob25184a
[11]
B. Viswambharan, K. Selvakumar, S. Madhavan, P. Shanmugam, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 2108-2111. DOI:10.1021/ol100591r
[12]
X. H. Chen, Q. Wei, S. W. Luo, H. Xiao, L. Z. Gong, Am J. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 13819-13825. DOI:10.1021/ja905302f
[13]
B. M. Trost, N. Cramer, S. M. Silverman, Am J. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 12396-12397. DOI:10.1021/ja075335w
[14]
W. Zhang, M. L. Go, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2009, 17, 2077-2090. DOI:10.1016/j.bmc.2008.12.052
[15]
H. Jiang, Z. Feng, T. Chen, Z. Li, W. Huang, Y. Luo, Y. Zhao, Chem J. Res., 2018, 42, 44-49. DOI:10.3184/174751918X15166485941737
[16]
A. Nagarsenkar, S. K. Prajapti, S. D. Guggilapu, S. Birineni, Kotapalli S. Sravanti, R. Ummanni, B. N. Babu, MedChemComm, 2016, 7, 646-653. DOI:10.1039/C5MD00513B
[17]
M. N. A. Andreani, M. Rambaldv, A. Locatelli, R. Bossa, I. Galatulas, Eur. Med J. Chem., 1990, 25, 187-190. DOI:10.1016/0223-5234(90)90027-Z
[18]
H. J. Lee, J. W. Lim, J. Yu, J. N. Kim, Tetrahedron Lett., 2014, 55, 1183-1187. DOI:10.1016/j.tetlet.2013.12.097
[19]
D. Villemin, B. Martin, Synth. Commun., 1998, 28, 3201-3208. DOI:10.1080/00397919808004422
[20]
P. W. Y. Hu, H. Kang, B. Zeng, H. Huang, Heterocycl. Commun., 2008, 14, 263-267.
[21]
C. Van Goethem, M. Mertens, F. G. Cirujano, J. W. Seo, D. De Vos, I. F. J. Vankelecom, Chem. Commun., 2018, 54, 7370-7373. DOI:10.1039/C8CC04326D
[22]
H. Jin, J. Xie, C. Pan, Z. Zhu, Y. Cheng, C. Zhu, ACS Catal., 2013, 3, 2195-2198. DOI:10.1021/cs400572q
[23]
P. Gholamzadeha, G. M. Ziarania, A. Badieib, Z. Bahrami, Eur. Chem J., 2012, 3, 279-282. DOI:10.5155/eurjchem.3.3.279-282.630
[24]
L. Vivier, D. Duprez, ChemSusChem, 2010, 3, 654-678. DOI:10.1002/cssc.201000054
[25]
M. Tamura, M. Honda, Y. Nakagawa, K. Tomishige, Chem J. Technol. Biotechnol., 2014, 89, 19-33. DOI:10.1002/jctb.4209
[26]
W. Huang, Y. Gao, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2014, 4, 3772-3784. DOI:10.1039/C4CY00679H
[27]
M. Tamura, H. Wakasugi, K. Shimizu, A. Satsuma, Chem. Eur. J., 2011, 17, 11428-11431. DOI:10.1002/chem.201101576
[28]
M. Tamura, K. Shimizu, A. Satsuma, Chem. Lett., 2012, 41, 41, 1397-1405.
[29]
M. Tamura, T. Tonomura, K. Shimizu, A. Satsuma, Appl. Catal. A, 2012, 417-418, 6-12.
[30]
M. Tamura, T. Tonomura, K. Shimizu, A. Satsuma, Green Chem., 2012, 14, 984-991. DOI:10.1039/c2gc16424h
[31]
M. Tamura, A. Satsuma, K. I. Shimizu, Catal. Sci. Technol., 2013, 3, 1386-1393. DOI:10.1039/c3cy00033h
[32]
M. Tamura, S. M. A. H. Siddiki, K. Shimizu, Green Chem., 2013, 15, 1641-1646. DOI:10.1039/c3gc40408k
[33]
S. M. A. H. Siddiki, A. S. Touchy, M. Tamura, K. Shimizu, RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 35803-35807. DOI:10.1039/C4RA07419J
[34]
M. Tamura, K. Sawabe, K. Tomishige, A. Satsuma, K. Shimizu, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 20-26. DOI:10.1021/cs501448n
[35]
T. Toyao, M. N. Rashed, Y. Morita, T. Kamachi, S. M. A. H. Siddiki, M. A. Ali, A. S. Touchy, K. Kon, Z. Maeno, K. Yoshizawa, K. Shimizu, ChemCatChem, 2019, 11, 449-456. DOI:10.1002/cctc.201801098
[36]
M. N. Rashed, S. M. A. H. Siddiki, A. S. Touchy, M. A. R. Jamil, S. S. Poly, T. Toyao, Z. Maeno, K. Shimizu, Chem. Eur. J., 2019, 25, 10594-10605. DOI:10.1002/chem.201901446
[37]
T. E. James, S. L. Hemmingson, T. Ito, C. T. Campbell, Phys J. Chem. C, 2015, 119, 17209-17217. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b04621
[38]
M. N. Revoy, R. W. J. Scott, A. P. Grosvenor, Phys J. Chem. C, 2013, 117, 10095-10105. DOI:10.1021/jp3124814
[39]
K. Shimura, K. Kon, S. M. A. H. Siddiki, K. Shimizu, Appl. Catal. A, 2013, 462, 137-142.