电化学阳极氧化法制备类纳米管结构WO3光阳极用于光电催化全分解水

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62948-6

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来，随着能源和环境问题日益凸显，新型可再生能源的开发利用意义重大.其中开发高效的光阳极材料用于光电催化全分解水引起了广泛的研究兴趣.纳米WO₃由于其禁带宽度适中，被证明是一种效果良好的光催化分解水产氧的催化剂，但无法直接用于催化析氢.若将其作为光阳极材料，在施加较低偏压下可用于高效光电催化全分解水.纳米WO₃电极的众多制备方法中，电化学氧化法因其方法简单，高效，制备成本低而具有重要的应用价值.然而，通常情况下电化学氧化法得到的纳米WO₃薄膜多为无规则形貌或多孔膜.本文发展了一种简单的阳极氧化法，通过优化调变其制备过程中的氧化时间，氧化电压，电解质离子浓度以及焙烧温度，确定了最佳制备条件（1 h，40 V，0.15 mol/L NH₄F，400 ℃）时样品的光电催化全分解水活性最高，其光电催化析氢和析氧的速率分别达到了3.93和1.96 μmol/cm²/h，且量子效率达5.23%的，此NAs-WO₃/W薄膜的光电催化活性和稳定性远超商业WO₃/W薄膜.
场发射扫描电镜结果显示，所制样品是一种新型的形貌规整的类纳米管阵列状WO₃薄膜.并进一步通过X射线衍射（XRD）、高分辨透射电子显微镜（HRTEM）、X射线光电子能谱（XPS）、紫外可见光谱、光电转换效率、光电流测试、和交流阻抗等手段研究了其晶体结构、表面化学组成、光学及光电化学性质.同时通过实验与计算获得了NAs-WO₃/W薄膜在420 nm单色光照下的表面空穴分离率，并与商业WO₃制备得到的WO₃/W薄膜进行了相关对比.XRD，HRTEM和XPS结果表明，所制NAs-WO₃/W薄膜是由暴露（020）和（202）晶面的单斜晶相WO₃构成.交流阻抗测试表明，NAs-WO₃/W的交流阻抗值要远小于商业WO₃/W，说明其光生载流子分离效果要比商业化的WO₃/W高；且NAs-WO₃/W薄膜的表面空穴分离率是商业WO₃/W薄膜的三倍.由此可见NAs-WO₃/W具有优异的光电催化性能（高光电转换效率和空穴分离效率），能有效应用于可见光全分解水反应，这主要归因于其类纳米管阵列的特殊一维结构、高结晶度的单斜态WO₃及WO₃与金属W片之间的强相互作用.本文为高效光电转换材料的制备提供了新的技术与途径.

关键词: WO₃, 钨片, 电化学氧化, 纳米管阵列, 光电催化, 分解水

Abstract:

Photoactive WO₃ is attractive as a photocatalyst for green energy evolution through water splitting. In the present work, an electrochemical anodic oxidation method was used to fabricate a photo-responsive nanotube array-like WO₃/W (NA-WO₃/W) photoanode from W foil as a precursor. Compared with a reference commercial WO₃/W electrode, the NA-WO₃/W photoanode exhibited enhanced and stable photoelectrocatalytic (PEC) activity for visible-light-driven water splitting with a typical H₂/O₂ stoichiometric ratio of 2:1 and quantum efficiency of approximately 5.23% under visible-light irradiation from a light-emitting diode (λ=420 nm, 15 mW/cm²). The greatly enhanced PEC performance of the NA-WO₃/Wphotoanode was attributed to its fast electron-hole separation rate, which resulted from the one-dimensional nanotube array-like structure, high crystallinity of monoclinic WO₃, and strong interaction between WO₃ and W foil. This work paves the way to a facile route to prepare highly active photoelectrodes for solar light transfer to chemical energy.

Key words: WO₃, W foil, Electrochemical anodization, Nanotube arrays, Photoelectrocatalysis, Water splitting

李凌凤, 赵小龙, 潘东来, 李贵生. 电化学阳极氧化法制备类纳米管结构WO₃光阳极用于光电催化全分解水[J]. 催化学报, 2017, 38(12): 2132-2140.

Lingfeng Li, Xiaolong Zhao, Donglai Pan, Guisheng Li. Nanotube array-like WO₃/W photoanode fabricated by electrochemical anodization for photoelectrocatalytic overall water splitting[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2017, 38(12): 2132-2140.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(17)62948-6

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2017/V38/I12/2132

参考文献

[1] X. B. Chen, S. H. Shen, L. J. Guo, S. S. Mao, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 6503-6570.
[2] P. Y. Kuang, L. Y. Zhang, B. Cheng, J. G. Yu, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 218, 570-580.
[3] S. J. A. Moniz, S. A. Shevlin, D. J. Martin, Z. X. Guo, J. W. Tang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2015, 8, 731-759.
[4] D. Y. Fan, R. F. Chong, F. T. Fan, X. L. Wang, C. Li, Z. C. Feng, Chin. J. Catal., 2016, 37, 1257-1262.
[5] K. Maeda, K. Domen, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2010, 1, 2655-2661
[6] G. S. Li, Z. C. Lian, X. Li, Y. Y. Xu, W. C. Wang, D. Q. Zhang, F. H. Tian, H. X. Li, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015, 3, 3748-3756.
[7] Z. C. Lian, W. C. Wang, S. N. Xiao, X. Li, Y. Y. Cui, D. Q. Zhang, G. S. Li, H. X. Li, Sci. Rep., 2015, 5, 10461.
[8] A. Fujishima, K. Honda, Nature, 1972, 238, 37-38.
[9] M. D. Hernández-Alonso, F. Fresno, S. Suárez, J. M. Coronado, Energy Environ. Sci., 2009, 2, 1231.
[10] M. Barroso, A. J. Cowan, S. R. Pendlebury, M. Grätzel, D. R. Klug, J. R. Durrant, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 14868-14871.
[11] L. L. Li, Y. Chu, Y. Liu, L. H. Dong, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111, 2123-2127.
[12] J. Jin, J. G. Yu, D. P. Guo, C. Cui, W. K. Ho, Small, 2015, 11, 5262-5271.
[13] Z. K. Zheng, B. Y. Huang, Z. Y. Wang, M. Guo, X. Y. Qin, X. Y. Zhang, P. Wang, Y. Dai, J. Phys. Chem. C., 2009, 113, 14448-14453.
[14] M. E. Aguirre, R. Zhou, A. J. Eugene, M. I. Guzman, M. A. Grela, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 217, 485-493.
[15] X. Zong, G. P. Wu, H. J. Yan, G. J. Ma, J. Y. Shi, F. Y. Wen, L. Wang, C. Li, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114, 1963-1968.
[16] C. Zhu, C. G. Liu, Y. J. Zhou, Y. J. Fu, S. J. Guo, H. Q. Li, S. Zhao, H. Huang, Y. Liu, Z. H. Kang, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 216, 114-121.
[17] H. B. He, S. S. Xue, Z. Wu, C. L. Yu, K. Yang, G. M. Peng, W. Q. Zhou, D. H. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2016, 37, 1841-1850.
[18] Y. N. Liu, R. X. Wang, Z. K. Yang, H. Du, Y. F. Jiang, C. C. Shen, K. Liang, A. W. Xu, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36, 2135-2144.
[19] J. X. Low, J. G. Yu, M. Jaroniec, S. Wageh, A. A. Al-Ghamdi, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1601694.
[20] Y. Zheng, G. Chen, Y. G. Yu, Y. S. Zhou, F. He, Appl. Sur. Sci., 2016, 362, 182-190.
[21] M. Y. Wang, L. J. Cai, Y. Wang, F. C. Zhou, K. Xu, X. M. Tao, Y. Chai, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 4144-4151.
[22] W. Smith, Y. Zhao, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 19635-19641.
[23] Y. Y. Lu, G. Liu, J. Zhang, Z. C. Feng, C. Li, Z. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2016, 37, 349-358.
[24] C. L. Yu, Y. Bai, H. B. He, W. H. Fan, L. H. Zhu, W. Q. Zhou, Chin. J. Catal., 2015, 36, 2178-2185.
[25] H. H. Chen, X. Q. Xiong, L. L. Hao, X. Zhang, Y. M. Xu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2016, 389, 491-495.
[26] L. N. Qu, J. Y. Lang, S. W. Wang, Z. L. Chai, Y. G. Su, X. J. Wang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2016, 388, 412-419.
[27] Y. Su, Z. K. Han, L. Zhang, W. Z. Wang, M. Y. Duan, X. M. Li, Y. L. Zheng, Y. G. Wang, X. L. Lei, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 217, 108-114.
[28] J. L. Lv, J. F. Zhang, K. Dai, C. H. Liang, G. P. Zhu, Z. L. Wang, Z. Li. Dalton Trans., 2017, 46, 11335-11343.
[29] Z. L. Wang, J. F. Zhang, J. L. Lv, K. Dai, C. H. Liang, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 396, 791-798.
[30] J. L. Lv, K. Dai, J. F. Zhang, L. H. Lu, C. H. Liang, L. Geng, Z. L. Wang, G. Y. Yuan, G. P. Zhu, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2017, 391, 507-515.
[31] S. Y. Zhang, H. Li, Z. F. Yang, J. Alloy. Compd., 2017, 722, 555-563.
[32] F. Amano, E. Ishinaga, A. Yamakata, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117, 22584-22590.
[33] K. Maeda, M. Higashi, D. Lu, R. Abe, K. Domen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 5858-5868.
[34] C. Janáky, K. Rajeshwar, N. R. de Tacconi, W. Chanmanee, M. N. Huda, Catal. Today, 2013, 199, 53-64.
[35] Z. Chen, Y. T. Peng, F. Liu, Z. Y. Le, J. Zhu, G. R. Shen, D. Q. Zhang, M. C. Wen, S. N. Xiao, C. P. Liu, Y. F. Lu, H. X. Li, Nano Lett., 2015, 15, 6802-6808.
[36] J. Kim, C. W. Lee, W. Choi, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2010, 44, 6849-6854.
[37] H. D. Zheng, J. Z. Ou, M. S. Strano, R. B. Kaner, A. Mitchell, K. Kalantar-zadeh, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2011, 21, 2175-2196.
[38] P. Y. Dong, G. H. Hou, X. G. Xi. R. Shao, F. Dong, Environ. Sci. Nano, 2017, 4, 539-557.
[39] Z. F. Huang, J. J. Song, L. Pan, X. W. Zhang, L. Wang, J. J. Zou, Adv. Mater., 2015, 27, 5309-5327.
[40] Q. X. Mi, Y. Ping, Y. Li, B. F. Cao, B. S. Brunschwig, P. G. Khalifah, G. A. Galli, H. B. Gray, N. S. Lewis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 18318-18324.
[41] D. Kang, T. W. Kim, S. R. Kubota, A. C. Cardiel, H. G. Cha, K. S. Choi, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115, 12839-12887.
[42] L. J. Zhang, S. Li, B. K. Liu, D. J. Wang, T. F. Xie, ACS Catal., 2014, 4, 3724-3729.
[43] S. Girish Kumar, K. S. R. Koteswara Rao, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 355, 939-958.
[44] Y. Ma, Y. L. Jia, L. N. Wang, M. Yang, Y. P. Bi, Y. X. Qi, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2016, 390, 399-405.
[45] J. Zhang, Z. H. Liu, Z. F. Liu, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8, 9684-9691.
[46] X. Y. Feng, Y. B. Chen, Z. X. Qin, M. L. Wang, L. J. Guo, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2016, 8, 18089-18096.
[47] C. M. Ding, J. Y. Shi, Z. L. Wang, C. Li, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 675-688.
[48] W. C. Wang, F. Li, D. Q. Zhang, D. Y. C. Leung, G. S. Li, Appl. Sur. Sci., 2016, 362, 490-497.
[49] Y. Hou, M. Qiu, G. Nam, M. G. Kim, T. Zhang, K. J. Liu, X. D. Zhuang, J. Cho, C. Yuan, X. L. Feng, Nano Lett., 2017, 17, 4202-4209.
[50] P. Sudhagar, A. Devadoss, K. Nakata, C. Terashima, A. Fujishima,J. Electrochem. Soc., 2015, 162, H108-H114.
[51] B. S. Wang, R. Y. Li, Z. Y. Zhang, W. W. Zhang, X. L. Yan, X. L. Wu, G. A. Cheng, R. T. Zheng, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2017, 5, 14415-14421.
[52] M. R. Nellist, F. A. L. Laskowski, F. Lin, T. J. Mills, S. W. Boettcher, Acc. Chem. Res., 2016, 49, 733-740.
[53] D. Chandra, K. Saito, T. Yui, M. Yagi, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 12606-12609.
[54] G. Longobucco, L. Pasti, A. Molinari, N. Marchetti, S. Caramori, V. Cristino, R. Boaretto, C. A. Bignozzi, Appl. Catal. B, 2017, 204, 273-282.
[55] M. M. Momeni, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 357, 160-166.
[56] S. Minagar, C. C. Berndt, J. Wang, E. Ivanova, C. Wen, Acta Biomater., 2012, 8, 2875-2888.
[57] M. Saito, S. Fujihara, J. Ceram. Soc. Japan, 2009, 117, 823-827.
[58] T. W. Kim, K. S. Choi, Science, 2014, 343, 990-994.
[59] G. S. Li, Z. C. Lian, W. C. Wang, D. Q. Zhang, H. X. Li, Nano Energy, 2016, 19, 446-454.
[60] E. Casbeer, V. K. Sharma, X. Z. Li, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2012, 87, 1-14.
[61] D. Barreca, G. Carta, A. Gasparotto, G. Rossetto, E. Tondello, P. Zanella, Surf. Sci. Spec., 2001, 8, 258-267.
[62] D. K. Zhong, S. Choi, D. R. Gamelin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 18370-18377.
[63] F. L. Martínez, M. Toledano-Luque, J. J. Gandía, J. Cárabe, W. Bohne, J. Röhrich, E. Strub, I. Mártil, J. Phys. D, 2007, 40, 5256.
[64] Y. Guan, Y. H. Gong, W. J. Li, J. Gelb, L. Zhang, G. Liu, X. B. Zhang, X. X. Song, C. R. Xia, Y. Q. Xiong, H. Q. Wang, Z. Y. Wu, Y. C. Tian, J. Power. Sources, 2011, 196, 10601-10605.
[65] L. Wu, F. Li, Y. Y. Xu, J. W. Zhang, D. Q. Zhang, G. S. Li, H. X. Li, Appl. Catal. B, 2015, 164, 217-224.
[66] S. F. Chen, H. Y. Zhang, X. L. Yu, W. Liu, Chin. J. Chem., 2011, 29, 399-404.
[67] L. S. Yoong, F. K. Chong, B. K. Dutta, Energy, 2009, 34, 1652-1661.
[68] F. F. Abdi, R. van de Krol, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2012, 116, 9398-9404.
[69] H. Dotan, K. Sivula, M. Gratzel, A. Rothschild, S. C. Warren, Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4, 958-964.
[70] J. M. Foley, M. J. Price, J. I. Feldblyum, S. Maldonado, Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 5203-5220.
[71] M. Zhou, J. Bao, W. T. Bi, Y. Q. Zeng, R. Zhu, M. S. Tao, Y. Xie, ChemSusChem, 2012, 5, 1420-1425.
[72] K. H. Ye, Z. L. Wang, J. W. Gu, S. Xiao, Y. F. Yuan, Y. M. Zhu, Y. Zhang, W. J Mai, S. H. Yang, Energy Environ. Sci., 2017, 10, 772-779.
[73] P. Desiati, A. Lazarian, Astrophys. J., 2013, 762, 44.
[74] R. M. Fernández-Domene, R. Sánchez-Tovar, E. Segura-Sanchís, J. García-Antón, Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 286, 59-67.

电化学阳极氧化法制备类纳米管结构WO₃光阳极用于光电催化全分解水

Nanotube array-like WO₃/W photoanode fabricated by electrochemical anodization for photoelectrocatalytic overall water splitting

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	关志朋, 杨东锋, 刘钊, 朱书祥, 仲星星, 王华敏, 李向伟, 戚孝天, 易红, 雷爱文. 区域选择性地电化学氧化自由基参与的邻位-(4 + 2)/原位-(3 + 2)环化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 144-153.
[2]	周波, 石建巧, 姜一民, 肖磊, 逯宇轩, 董帆, 陈晨, 王特华, 王双印, 邹雨芹. 强化脱氢动力学实现超低电池电压和大电流密度下抗坏血酸电氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 372-380.
[3]	魏艳, 段睿智, 张巧兰, 曹有智, 王金圆, 王冰, 万雯瑞, 刘春燕, 陈加藏, 高红, 景欢旺. TiO₂/TiN纳米管异质结用于光电催化CO₂还原: 氮辅助活性氢机制[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 47(4): 243-253.
[4]	池海波, 王旺银, 马江平, 段睿智, 丁春梅, 宋睿, 李灿. 光电催化脱氟-氧化过程实现氟芳烃污染物的高效矿化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 55(12): 171-181.
[5]	张鹏, 李佑稷, 李鑫. 太阳能驱动H₂O₂的原位生产与利用: 自循环光催化芬顿系统[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 44(1): 4-6.
[6]	张纹, 田梦, 焦海淼, 蒋海英, 唐军旺. 高匹配的BiVO₄/WO₃纳米碗异质结光阳极用于高效光电化学分解水[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(9): 2321-2331.
[7]	黄楚强, 周建清, 段丁槊, 周前程, 汪杰明, 彭博文, 余罗, 余颖. 异质原子在碱性电解水催化剂中的作用——反应机理[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(8): 2091-2110.
[8]	张宪文, 李政, 刘太丰, 李名润, 曾超斌, 松本弘昭, 韩洪宪. Pt/SrTiO₃光催化全分解水过程中水氧化活性位点的研究[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(8): 2223-2230.
[9]	徐志莹, 郭春雨, 刘欣, 李苓, 王亮, 徐浩兰, 张东柯, 李春虎, 李勤, 王文泰. Ag纳米粒子修饰有机/无机Z型3DOMM-TiO_2‒_x异质结的构建及高效光催化和光电催化分解水制氢[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(5): 1360-1370.
[10]	卢海娇, 李显龙, Sabiha Akter Monny, 王志亮, 王连洲. 基于过渡金属氧化物半导体上光电催化生产过氧化氢[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(5): 1204-1215.
[11]	苗昱聪, 邵明飞. 光电催化用于高附加值化学品合成[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(3): 595-610.
[12]	郭伟琦, 罗皓霖, 江治, 上官文峰. 压力诱导相变原位构建BiVO₄/Bi_0.6Y_0.4VO₄ S型异质结增强光催化全解水性能[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(2): 316-328.
[13]	白浚贤, 沈荣晨, 姜志民, 张鹏, 李佑稷, 李鑫. 集成二维层状CdS/WO₃ S型异质结及金属化Ti₃C₂ MXene基欧姆结高效光催化产氢[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(2): 359-369.
[14]	张建军, 杨高元, 何博文, 程蓓, 李佑稷, 梁桂杰, 王临曦. CdS/Pt异质结光催化剂光解水的电子转移动力学[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(10): 2530-2538.
[15]	赵梦雨, 刘森, 陈代梅, 张苏舒, Sónia A. C. Carabineiro, 吕康乐. ZnIn₂S₄纳米片与WO₃纳米棒构建3D结构的S型异质结用于可见光光催化分解水产氢[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(10): 2615-2624.