扫描隧道显微术应用于表界面电催化过程的研究进展

催化学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (s1): 11-16.

扫描隧道显微术应用于表界面电催化过程的研究进展

王翔^1,2, 王栋^1,2, 万立骏^1,2

1 中国科学院化学研究所, 中国科学院分子纳米结构与纳米技术重点实验室, 中国科学院分子科学科教融合卓越中心, 北京 100190;
2 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049

出版日期:2019-12-17 发布日期:2019-10-10
通讯作者: 王栋, 万立骏
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（21725306，21433011，91527303）；中国科学院战略性先导科技专项（XDB12020100）；国家重点研发计划（2017YFA0204702）.

Investigation of surface processes in electrocatalysis by scanning tunneling microscopy

WANG Xiang^1,2, WANG Dong^1,2, WAN Lijun^1,2

1 CAS Key Laboratory of Molecular Nanostructure and Nanotechnology, CAS Research/Education Center for Excellence in Molecular Sciences, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Online:2019-12-17 Published:2019-10-10
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21725306, 21433011, 91527303); the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB12020100), and the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA0204702).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 电化学能源技术的发展对解决能源环境问题有着重要的意义.从原子或分子的尺度上研究电极表面电催化反应的相关过程将有助于了解反应的机理，进而指导高效稳定的电催化剂的设计.本文主要结合近年来国内外的相关工作，综述了利用扫描隧道显微术研究表界面电催化过程的有关进展，包括表面吸附、表面扩散、底物结合等非反应过程以及催化剂结构变化、对比度转化、活性位点分辨等反应过程的研究.同时分析了制约领域发展的关键科学问题并展望了未来的发展方向.

关键词: 扫描隧道显微术, 表界面, 电催化过程, 电催化剂, 反应机理

Abstract: The development of electrochemical energy technology is of great significance for solving the energy and environment problems. Investigating the processes of electrocatalytic reactions on the electrode surface at the atomic and molecular scale benefits reaction mecha-nisms studies, and provides the fundamental guideline for designing high-efficient and stable electrocatalysts. This review summarizes recent studies on investigating surface processes in electrocatalysis by scanning tunneling microscopy, including non-reactive processes such as surface adsorption, surface diffusion, reactants binding, and reaction processes such as structure changes and contrast transformations of catalysts, as well as distinguishing active sites. The key scientific issues and future developments in the field are also outlined.

Key words: Scanning tunneling microscopy, Surface and interface, Electrocatalytic process, Electrocatalyst, Reaction mechanism

王翔, 王栋, 万立骏. 扫描隧道显微术应用于表界面电催化过程的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2019, 40(s1): 11-16.

WANG Xiang, WANG Dong, WAN Lijun. Investigation of surface processes in electrocatalysis by scanning tunneling microscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2019, 40(s1): 11-16.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2019/V40/Is1/11

参考文献

1 Peng Y, Lu B Z, Chen S W. Adv. Mater., 2018, 30:1801995
2 Pegis M L, Wise C F, Martin D J, Mayer J M. Chem Rev, 2018, 118:2340
3 Suen N T, Hung S F, Quan Q, Zhang N, Xu Y J, Chen H M. Chem Soc Rev, 2017, 46:337
4 Yang C, Fontaine O, Tarascon J M, Grimaud A. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2017, 56:8652
5 Zhang L, Zhao Z J, Gong J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56:11326
6 Nguyen D, Kang G, Chiang N H, Chen X, Seideman T, Hersam M C, Schatz G C, Van Duyne R P. J Am. Chem Soc, 2018, 140:5948
7 Shao M, Chang Q, Dodelet J P, Chenitz R. Chem Rev, 2016, 116:3594
8 You B, Sun Y. Acc Chem Res, 2018, 51:1571
9 Safizadeh F, Ghali E, Houlachi G. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40:256
10 Cui D L, MacLeod J M, Rosei F. Chem Commun, 2018, 54:10527
11 Mazur U, Hipps K W. Chem Commun, 2015, 51:4737
12 Munninghoff J A W, Elemans J A A W. Chem Commun, 2017, 53:1769
13 Murphy B E, Krasnikov S A, Sergeeva N N, Cafolla A A, Preobrajenski A B, Chaika A N, Lubben O, Shvets I V. Acs Nano, 2014, 8:5190
14 Singh S K, Takeyasu K, Nakamura J. Adv. Mater., 2018:e1804297
15 Wu J B, Yang H. Acc Chem Res, 2013, 46:1848
16 Sasaki K, Naohara H, Choi Y M, Cai Y, Chen W F, Liu P, Adzic R R. Nat Commun, 2012, 3:1115
17 Maroun F, Ozanam F, Magnussen M, Behm R J. Science, 2001, 293:1811
18 Beckord S, Engstfeld A K, Brimaud S, Behm R J. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120:16179
19 Morlanes N, Takanabe K, Rodionov V. ACS Catal, 2016, 6:3092
20 Ponce I, Silva J F, Onate R, Rezende M C, Paez M A, Zagal J H, Pavez J, Mendizabal F, Miranda-Rojas S, Munoz-Castro A, Arratia-Perez R. J Phys Chem C, 2012, 116:15329
21 Wurster B, Grumelli D, Hotger D, Gutzler R, Kern K. J Am Chem Soc, 2016, 138:3623
22 Kumeda T, Hoshi N, Nakamura M, Sakata O, Tajiri H. Nat Commun, 2018, 9:4378
23 Rahn B, Wen R, Deuchler L, Stremme J, Franke A, Pehlke E, Magnussen O M. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2018, 57:6065
24 Rahn B, Magnussen O M. ChemElectroChem, 2018, 5:3073
25 Sedona F, Di Marino M, Forrer D, Vittadini A, Casarin M, Cossaro A, Floreano L, Verdini A, Sambi M. Nat Mater, 2012, 11:970
26 Inukai J, Tryk D A, Abe T, Wakisaka M, Uchida H, Watanabe M.. Am Chem Soc, 2013, 135:1476
27 Gu J Y, Cai Z F, Wang D, Wan L J. ACS Nano, 2016, 10:8746
28 Cai Z F, Wang X, Wang D, Wan L J. ChemElectroChem, 2016:2048
29 Pfisterer J H K, Liang Y, Schneider O, Bandarenka A S. Nature, 2017, 549:74
30 Liang J, Du X, Gibson C, Du X W, Qiao S Z. Adv Mater, 2013, 25:6226
31 Lin C Y, Zhang D T, Zhao Z H, Xia Z H. Adv Mater, 2018, 30:1703646
32 Chandran P, Ghosh A, Ramaprabhu S. Sci Rep, 2018, 8:3591
33 Wei J, Liao W C, Lei J, Yau S, Chen Y X. J Phys Chem C, 2018, 122:26111
34 Jacobse L, Huang Y F, Koper M T M, Rost M J. Nat Mater, 2018, 17:277
35 Cai L L, Yu X, Liu M X, Sun Q, Bao M L, Zha Z Q, Pan J L, Ma H H, Ju H X, Hu S W, Xu L, Zou J C, Yuan C X, Jacob T, Bjork J, Zhu J F, Qu X H, Xu W. ACS Nano, 2018, 12:7959
36 Xu L R, Zhou X, Tian W Q, Gao T, Zhang Y F, Lei S B, Liu Z F. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2014, 53:9564
37 Liu X H, Yue J Y, Mo Y P, Yao Y, Zeng C, Chen T, Yang H J, Wang Z H, Wang D, Wan L J. J Phys Chem C, 2016, 120:15753
38 Liu X H, Guan C Z, Ding S Y, Wang W, Yan H J, Wang D, Wan L J. J Am Chem Soc, 2013, 135:10470
39 Sun K W, Chen A X, Liu M Z, Zhang H M, Duan R M, Ji P H, Li L, Li Q, Li C, Zhong D Y, Mullen K, Chi L F. J Am Chem Soc, 2018, 140:4820
40 Cai Z F, Dong W L, Chen T, Yan H J, Wang D, Xu W, Wan L J. Chem Commun, 2018, 54:8052
41 Xu J, Liu W X, Geng Y F, Deng K, Zhan C L, Zeng Q D. Nanoscale, 2017, 9:2579
42 Su H S, Zhang X G, Sun J J, Jin X, Wu D Y, Lian X B, Zhong J H, Ren B. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2018, 57:13177
43 Wang X, Huang S C, Huang T X, Su H S, Zhong J H, Zeng Z C, Li M H, Ren B. Chem Soc Rev, 2017, 46:4020
44 Wu Z B, Gao Z Y, Chen X Y, Xing Y Q, Yang H, Li G, Ma R S, Wang A W, Yan J H, Shen C M, Du S X, Huan Q, Gao H J. Rev Sci Instrum, 2018, 89:113705
45 Lang S Y, Shi Y, Guo Y G, Wang D, Wen R, Wan L J. Angew Chem Int Ed, 2016, 55:15835
46 Friedl J, Gu J Y, Stimming U, Horrocks B R. ChemElectroChem, 2018, 5:25

[1]	周波, 石建巧, 姜一民, 肖磊, 逯宇轩, 董帆, 陈晨, 王特华, 王双印, 邹雨芹. 强化脱氢动力学实现超低电池电压和大电流密度下抗坏血酸电氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 372-380.
[2]	欧阳玲, 梁杰, 罗永嵩, 郑冬冬, 孙圣钧, 刘倩, Mohamed S. Hamdy, 孙旭平, 应斌武. 电催化合成氨的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 6-44.
[3]	李静静, 张锋伟, 詹新雨, 郭河芳, 张涵, 昝文艳, 孙振宇, 张献明. 酞菁镍分子结构的精确设计: 优化电子和空间效应用于CO₂电还原[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 48(5): 117-126.
[4]	张文静, 李静, 魏子栋. 碳基氧还原电催化剂: 机理研究和多孔结构[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 48(5): 15-31.
[5]	刘丹卿, 张丙兴, 赵国强, 陈建, 潘洪革, 孙文平. 原位电化学扫描探针显微镜技术在电催化领域的应用进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 47(4): 93-120.
[6]	叶艳文, 胡一鸣, 郑万彬, 贾爱平, 王瑜, 鲁继青. 配体覆盖的Ir催化剂上巴豆醛加氢反应: 金属-有机物界面促进活性和选择性[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 47(4): 265-277.
[7]	刘润泽, 邵雪, 王畅, 戴卫理, 关乃佳. 甲醇制烃反应机理: 基础及应用研究[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 47(4): 67-92.
[8]	吴则星, 高玉肖, 王子璇, 肖卫平, 王新萍, 李彬, 李镇江, 刘晓斌, 马天翼, 王磊. 表面富集的超小铂纳米颗粒耦合缺陷磷化钴用于高效的电催化水分解和柔性锌空气电池[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 46(3): 36-47.
[9]	Johannes A. Lercher. 三氧化钨催化糖分子选择裂解新机理及其对生物质利用的重要意义[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 46(3): 1-3.
[10]	黄志鹏, 杨阳, 穆骏驹, 李根恒, 韩建宇, 任濮宁, 张健, 罗能超, 韩克利, 王峰. 利用金属-自由基相互作用调控自由基的定向转化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 45(2): 120-131.
[11]	刘小妮, 刘晓斌, 李彩霞, 杨波, 王磊. 缺陷工程在金属基电池中的研究进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 45(2): 27-87.
[12]	逯宇轩, 杨柳, 姜一民, 原甑然, 王双印, 邹雨芹. 局域静电环境工程用于增强电催化生物质转化过程中羟基活性[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 53(10): 153-160.
[13]	乔玉彦, 潘艳秋, 张江威, 王彬, 武婷婷, 范文俊, 曹雨程, Rashid Mehmood, 张飞, 章福祥. 多碳界面工程用于促进NiFe纳米复合电催化剂的产氧反应[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(9): 2354-2362.
[14]	崔彤, 翟雪君, 郭莉莉, 迟京起, 张昱, 朱家伟, 孙雪梅, 王磊. 自组装百合花状超低Ru, Ni掺杂的Fe₂O₃用于大电流碱性海水电解双功能电催化[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(8): 2202-2211.
[15]	周紫璇, 高鹏. 多相催化CO₂加氢直接合成大宗化学品与液体燃料[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(8): 2045-2056.