MoSe2纳米片耦合Pt纳米颗粒用于高效双功能催化甲醇辅助水电解制氢

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(23)64469-9

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

化石燃料的大量消耗所带来的全球性挑战推动人们大力发展清洁和可持续的能源.氢能作为一种绿色、无污染的能源载体,是能源向绿色经济转换的关键,而利用可再生能源进行的电解水制氢被认为是实现绿色制氢的最佳选择.然而由于析氧反应(OER)的氧化电位(1.23V)较高,动力学缓慢,实际水电解需要更多的能量输入.具有低氧化电位的甲醇辅助水电解(0.016V)可以匹配可再生能源实现低能耗电解制氢,受到了广泛关注.开发高效的用于催化甲醇氧化(MOR)和析氢反应(HER)的双功能催化剂是实现这一愿景的前提.传统的Pt基催化剂容易受到阳极侧MOR过程中产生的CO中间体毒化,严重影响甲醇辅助水电解制氢的效率.
为了提升Pt基催化剂的催化活性和稳定性,一种有效的策略是引入合适的功能组分来促进催化反应.例如,贵金属颗粒和亲氧化成分(如过渡金属氧化物和磷化物)之间的金属-载体相互作用可以有效提高Pt基催化剂的抗CO中毒能力.过渡金属硒化物由于其优良的金属性和亲氧性作为催化促进剂受到越来越多的关注.硒化钼(MoSe₂)具有良好的稳定性和导电性并且其2H相中的不饱和边缘具有水活化和解离活性,同时其吸附H原子的吉布斯自由能(ΔG_H*)接近于零.考虑到MoSe₂的高水活化/解离能力,本文成功制备了二维MoSe₂纳米片负载的Pt纳米粒子复合催化剂(Pt/MoSe₂)用于高效甲醇电解制氢.密度泛函理论计算表明,亲氧组分MoSe₂显著优化了CO*和H*在Pt表面的吸附能,从而大大提高了甲醇辅助水电解的活性和稳定性.其中,Pt/MoSe₂的甲醇氧化峰值电流密度为67.8mA cm^-2,是商业Pt/C催化剂的2.5倍;在10mA∙cm^-2的电流密度下,HER的过电位低至32mV.由Pt/MoSe₂||Pt/MoSe₂组装的两电极电解槽驱动10mA∙cm^-2的电流密度仅需要0.67V的电压,与相同条件下的水电解相比节省了约1.09V的电池电压,大大降低了能量输入.催化性能的提升可以归因于改善的电荷转移以及Pt与亲氧MoSe₂之间的金属-载体相互作用,该相互作用使得Pt从MoSe₂载体上得到了部分电子,增加了Pt周围的电子密度,使得邻近Pt的d带中心下移,从而通过削弱CO‒Pt键进而增强了Pt位点的抗CO中毒能力.综上,本文对开发用于甲醇辅助水电解制氢的新型双功能催化剂具有借鉴意义.

关键词: 硒化钼, 二维结构, 制氢, 甲醇辅助水分解, Pt纳米颗粒

Abstract:

Efficient metal-support interaction induced high catalysis performance plays a significant role in energy conversion reactions. Herein, two-dimensional (2D) MoSe₂ nanosheet-coupled Pt nanoparticles as efficient bi-functional catalysts were demonstrated for hydrogen production from the methanol-assisted water-splitting reaction. The oxophilic MoSe₂ component with 2D structures optimized the adsorption of CO* and H* on Pt sites as demonstrated by spectroscopic and theoretical analysis, which resulted in enhanced catalytic ability in methanol-assisted water splitting reaction. The peak current density was 2.5 times higher than that of commercial Pt/C catalyst for methanol oxidation and a small overpotential of 32 mV was demanded to achieve a current density of 10 mA cm^-2 for hydrogen evolution reaction in the methanol-containing electrolyte. When serviced as both cathode and anode, a low cell voltage of 0.66 V was required at 10 mA cm^-2, significantly lower than that of 1.75 V required for water splitting. The high performance can be attributed to the oxophilicity of MoSe₂ and their strong metal-support interaction that promoted the charge transfer and anti-CO poisoning of Pt sites. This work would be instructive for the development of novel bi-functional catalyst platforms for methanol-assisted water splitting in hydrogen production.

Key words: Molybdenum Selenide, 2D structure, Hydrogen production, Methanol-assisted water splitting, Pt nanoparticles

乔蔚, 于立策, 常进法, 杨甫林, 冯立纲. MoSe₂纳米片耦合Pt纳米颗粒用于高效双功能催化甲醇辅助水电解制氢[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51: 113-123.

Wei Qiao, Lice Yu, Jinfa Chang, Fulin Yang, Ligang Feng. Efficient bi-functional catalysis of coupled MoSe₂ nanosheet/Pt nanoparticles for methanol-assisted water splitting[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2023, 51: 113-123.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(23)64469-9

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2023/V51/I8/113

图/表 6

Fig. 1. SEM image of MoSe2 (a) and Pt/MoSe2 (b). TEM (c,d) and HRTEM (e) images and the corresponding SAED pattern (f), EDS spectra (g), STEM image (h) and corresponding elemental mapping images (i?k) and overlap image (l) of Pt/MoSe2 catalyst.

Fig. 2. (a) XRD patterns of Pt/MoSe2, PtMo/C and Pt/C. (b) Pt 4f XPS spectra of the Pt/MoSe2, PtMo/C and Pt/C. (c) Mo 3d spectra for Pt/MoSe2 and PtMo/C. (d) Se 3d spectrum for Pt/MoSe2.

Fig. 3. (a) CV curves of Pt/MoSe2, PtMo/C, Pt/C and MoSe2 catalysts. (b) The graphical comparison of peak current density after different scan cycles, CA curves (c), CO stripping curves (d), and the graphical comparison of mass and specific activity (e) of Pt/MoSe2, PtMo/C and Pt/C catalysts.

Fig. 4. (a) CV curves of the Pt/MoSe2 catalyst recorded at scan rates of 5 mV to 150 mV s-1. (b) The corresponding plot of different catalysts with forward peak current density as a function of the square root of the scan rate (v1/2). (c) Nyquist plots of different catalysts. (d) The in situ FTIR spectra of Pt/MoSe2.

Fig. 5. (a) LSV polarization curves of Pt/MoSe2, PtMo/C, Pt/C and MoSe2. Tafel plots (b), specific activity (c) and TOF curves (d) of Pt/MoSe2, PtMo/C, Pt/C catalysts. (e) LSV polarization curves before and after 1000 CV cycles of Pt/MoSe2 (inset: CA curve for Pt/MoSe2 in 0.5 mol L?1 H2SO4 + 1.0 mol L?1 CH3OH at an overpotential of 32 mV). (f) LSV polarization curves of the Pt/MoSe2 || Pt/MoSe2 and Pt/C || Pt/C electrodes in 0.5 mol L?1 H2SO4 with and without 1.0 mol L?1 CH3OH (inset: CA curve for Pt/MoSe2 in 0.5 mol L?1 H2SO4 + 1 mol L?1 CH3OH at a potential of 0.66 V).

Fig. 6. (a) The optimized model of Pt/MoSe2. (b) The optimized atomic geometries of the intermediates on Pt/MoSe2 surface. (c) Free energy diagram for MOR on Pt/MoSe2 (red) and Pt (grey) surface. (d) Calculated ECO* on the different sites of different Pt (111) surface of Pt/MoSe2, PtMo and Pt. (e) Electron density difference of Pt/MoSe2 (yellow: electron depletion and blue: electron accumulation). (f) Calculated ΔGH* of Pt/MoSe2, PtMo and Pt/C.

参考文献

[1]	R. He, X. Y. Huang, L. G. Feng, Energy Fuels, 2022, 36, 6675-6694.
[2]	C. Wang, A. Schechter, L. G. Feng, Nano Res. Energy, 2023, 2, e9120056.
[3]	Q. Shen, C. Du, Q. Chen, J. Tang, B. Wang, X. Zhang, J. Chen, Mater. Today Phys., 2022, 23, 100625.
[4]	X. Bai, J. Guan, Chin. J. Catal., 2022, 43, 2057-2090.
[5]	Y. Cao, ACS Nano, 2021, 15, 11014-11039.
[6]	J. Han, J. Guan, Nano Res., 2023, 16, 1913-1966.
[7]	D. He, L. Cao, L. Feng, S. Li, Y. Feng, G. Li, Y. Zhang, J. Li, J. Huang, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2022, 33, 4781-4785.
[8]	K. Zhang, X. Liang, L. Wang, K. Sun, Y. Wang, Z. Xie, Q. Wu, X. Bai, M.S. Hamdy, H. Chen, X. Zou, Nano Res. Energy, 2022, 1, e9120032.
[9]	T. Tang, Y. Wang, J. Han, Q. Zhang, X. Bai, X. Niu, Z. Wang, J. Guan, Chin. J. Catal., 2023, 46, 48-55.
[10]	T. Tang, Z. Duan, D. Baimanov, X. Bai, X. Liu, L. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Guan, Nano Res., 2023, 16, 2218-2223.
[11]	X. Bai, Z. Duan, B. Nan, L. Wang, T. Tang, J. Guan, Chin. J. Catal., 2022, 43, 2240-2248.
[12]	J. Li, S. Wang, J. Chang, L. Feng, Adv. Powder. Mater., 2022, 1, 100030.
[13]	X. Zhang, G. Ma, L. Shui, G. Zhou, X. Wang, J. Energy Chem., 2022, 72, 88-96.
[14]	Y.-C. Jiang, H.-Y. Sun, Y.-N. Li, J.-W. He, Q. Xue, X. Tian, F.-M. Li, S.-B. Yin, D.-S. Li, Y. Chen, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2021, 13, 35767-35776.
[15]	S. S. Pethaiah, K. K. Sadasivuni, A. Jayakumar, D. Ponnamma, C. S. Tiwary, G. Sasikumar, Energies, 2020, 13, 5879.
[16]	Y. Zhou, Q. Wang, X. Tian, L. Feng, Nano Res., 2022, 15, 8936-8945.
[17]	A. Muthumeenal, S. S. Pethaiah, A. Nagendran, Renewable Energy, 2016, 91, 75-82.
[18]	Y. Zhou, Y. Kuang, G. Hu, X. Wang, L. Feng, Mater. Today Phys., 2022, 27, 100831.
[19]	Y. Zhou, L. Yu, J. Chang, L. Feng, J. Zhang, Green Energy Environ., 2022, DOI: 10.1016/j.gee.2022.08.007.
[20]	Y. Zhao, Y. Liu, B. Miao, Y. Ding, P. Jin, Y. Chen, Chin. J. Struc. Chem., 2022, 41, 2204040-2204045.
[21]	J. Zhong, K. Huang, W. Xu, H. Tang, M. Waqas, Y. Fan, R. Wang, W. Chen, Y. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2021, 42, 1205-1215.
[22]	W. Qiao, X. Huang, L. Feng, Chin. J. Struc. Chem., 2022, 41, 2207016-2207034.
[23]	L. Huang, S. Zaman, Z. Wang, H. Niu, B. You, B. Xia, Acta Phys-Chim. Sin., 2021, 37, 2009035.
[24]	J. Li, J. Xie, X. Wang, Y. Dai, X. Xu, J. Liu, Z. Cai, X. Meng, J. Zou, Chin. J. Struc. Chem., 2022, 41, 2207059-2207067.
[25]	H. Liu, D. Yang, Y. Bao, X. Yu, L. Feng, J. Power. Sources, 2019, 434, 226754.
[26]	S. Wu, J. Liu, Y. Ye, Z. Tian, X. Zhu, C. Liang, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2019, 2, 5577-5583.
[27]	Y. Zhou, Q. Wang, X. Tian, J. Chang, L. Feng, J. Energy Chem., 2022, 75, 46-54.
[28]	L. Zhang, Y. Lei, D. Zhou, C. Xiong, Z. Jiang, X.Y. Li, H. Shang, Y. Zhao, W. Chen, B. Zhang, Nano Res., 2022, 15, 2895-2904.
[29]	T. Lu, B. Liu, F. Zeng, G. Cheng, S. Chu, M. Xie, Z. Chen, Z. Hou, J. Energy Chem., 2022, 74, 332-340.
[30]	L. Najafi, S. Bellani, R. Oropesa-Nunez, A. Ansaldo, M. Prato, A. E. Del Rio Castillo, F. Bonaccorso, Adv. Energy Mater., 2018, 8, 1703212.
[31]	L. Yu, T. Zhou, S. Cao, X. Tai, L. Liu, Y. Wang, Nano Res., 2021, 14, 2659-2665.
[32]	X. Guo, X. Li, Y. Li, J. Yang, X. Wan, L. Chen, J. Liu, X. Liu, R. Yu, L. Zheng, J. Shui, Nano Energy, 2020, 78, 105211.
[33]	D. Liu, N. Yang, Q. Zeng, H. Liu, D. Chen, P. Cui, L. Xu, C. Hu, J. Yang, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2021, 32, 3288-3297.
[34]	J.-H. Zheng, G. Li, J.-M. Zhang, N. Cheng, L.-F. Ji, J. Yang, J. Zhang, B.-W. Zhang, Y.-X. Jiang, S.-G. Sun, Sci. China Chem., 2023, 66, 279-288.
[35]	S. Li, Z.Q. Tian, Y. Liu, Z. Jang, S.W. Hasan, X. Chen, P. Tsiakaras, P.K. Shen, Chin. J. Catal., 2021, 42, 648-657.
[36]	X. Zhao, W. Cai, Y. Yang, X. Song, Z. Neale, H.-E. Wang, J. Sui, G. Cao, Nano Energy, 2018, 47, 224-234.
[37]	Z. Chen, W. Wang, S. Huang, P. Ning, Y. Wu, C. Gao, T.-T. Le, J. Zai, Y. Jiang, Z. Hu, X. Qian, Nanoscale, 2020, 12, 326-335.
[38]	P. J. Dietrich, R. J. Lobo-Lapidus, T. Wu, A. Sumer, M. C. Akatay, B. R. Fingland, N. Guo, J. A. Dumesic, C. L. Marshall, E. Stach, J. Jellinek, W. N. Delgass, F. H. Ribeiro, J. T. Miller, Top. Catal., 2012, 55, 53-69.
[39]	Z. Liu, J. E. Hu, Q. Wang, K. Gaskell, A. I. Frenkel, G. S. Jackson, B. Eichhorn, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 6924-6925.
[40]	J. Wang, Z. Jiang, G. Peng, E. Hoenig, G. Yan, M. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Du, C. Liu, Adv. Sci., 2022, 9, 2104857.
[41]	Z. Liu, C. Zhang, H. Liu, L. Feng, Appl. Catal. B, 2020, 276, 119165.
[42]	M. Li, Z. Zhao, W. Zhang, M. Luo, L. Tao, Y. Sun, Z. Xia, Y. Chao, K. Yin, Q. Zhang, L. Gu, W. Yang, Y. Yu, G. Lu, S. Guo, Adv. Mater., 2021, 33, 2103762.
[43]	J. Zhang, X. Qu, Y. Han, L. Shen, S. Yin, G. Li, Y. Jiang, S. Sun, Appl. Catal. B, 2020, 263, 118345.
[44]	K. Wang, D. Huang, Y. Guan, F. Liu, J. He, Y. Ding, ACS Catal., 2021, 11, 14428-14438.
[45]	P. Xi, Y. Cao, F. Yang, C. Ma, F. Chen, S. Yu, S. Wang, Z. Zeng, X. Zhang, Nanoscale, 2013, 5, 6124-6130.
[46]	J. Zhu, L. Xia, R. Yu, R. Lu, J. Li, R. He, Y. Wu, W. Zhang, X. Hong, W. Chen, Y. Zhao, L. Zhou, L.Q. Mai, Z. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 15529-15538.
[47]	Y. Bao, H. Liu, Z. Liu, F. Wang, L. Feng, Appl. Catal. B, 2020, 274, 119106.
[48]	G. Song, H. Yang, Y. Sun, J. Wang, W. Qu, Q. Zhang, L. Ma, Y. Feng, Chin. J. Catal., 2017, 38, 554-562.
[49]	W. Zhang, G.-J. Xia, Y.-G. Wang, Chin. J. Catal., 2022, 43, 167-176.
[50]	W. Qiao, X. Yang, M. Li, L. Feng, Nanoscale, 2021, 13, 6884-6889.
[51]	E. Urbańczyk, M. Wala, A. Blacha-Grzechnik, A. Stolarczyk, A. Maciej, W. Simka, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46, 33272-33286.
[52]	X. Ding, M. Li, J. Jin, X. Huang, X. Wu, L. Feng, Chin. Chem. Lett., 2022, 33, 2687-2691.
[53]	J. Chang, L. Feng, K. Jiang, H. Xue, W.-B. Cai, C. Liu, W. Xing, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2016, 4, 18607-18613.
[54]	J. E. Sulaiman, S. Zhu, Z. Xing, Q. Chang, M. Shao, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 5134-5141.
[55]	N. Erini, V. Beermann, M. Gocyla, M. Gliech, M. Heggen, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, P. Strasser, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 6533-6538.
[56]	J. Zhu, L. Hu, P. Zhao, L. Y. S. Lee, K.-Y. Wong, Chem. Rev., 2020, 120, 851-918.
[57]	N. Dubouis, A. Grimaud, Chem. Sci., 2019, 10, 9165-9181.
[58]	Z. Zhang, J. Liu, J. Wang, Q. Wang, Y. Wang, K. Wang, Z. Wang, M. Gu, Z. Tang, J. Lim, T. Zhao, F. Ciucci, Nat. Commun., 2021, 12, 5235.
[59]	P. Ferrin, M. Mavrikakis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 14381-14389.
[60]	Q. Tan, C. Shu, J. Abbott, Q. Zhao, L. Liu, T. Qu, Y. Chen, H. Zhu, Y. Liu, G. Wu, ACS Catal., 2019, 9, 6362-6371.
[61]	G. Liu, W. Zhou, Y. Ji, B. Chen, G. Fu, Q. Yun, S. Chen, Y. Lin, P.-F. Yin, X. Cui, J. Liu, F. Meng, Q. Zhang, L. Song, L. Gu, H. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2021, 143, 11262-11270.

MoSe₂纳米片耦合Pt纳米颗粒用于高效双功能催化甲醇辅助水电解制氢

Efficient bi-functional catalysis of coupled MoSe₂ nanosheet/Pt nanoparticles for methanol-assisted water splitting

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 6

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王思恺, 闵祥婷, 乔波涛, 颜宁, 张涛. 单原子催化: 追寻催化领域的“圣杯”[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 1-13.
[2]	尹春, 杨甫林, 王书莉, 冯立纲. 异质结构NiSe₂/MoSe₂用于高效尿素辅助电解水制氢[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 225-236.
[3]	周波, 石建巧, 姜一民, 肖磊, 逯宇轩, 董帆, 陈晨, 王特华, 王双印, 邹雨芹. 强化脱氢动力学实现超低电池电压和大电流密度下抗坏血酸电氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 50(7): 372-380.
[4]	Diab khalafallah, 张运祥, 王昊, Jong-Min Lee, 张勤芳. 联产混合电解水策略实现节能电化学制氢的最新进展[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 55(12): 44-115.
[5]	雷洋, 黄剑锋, 李鑫奥, 吕楚滢, 侯超苹, 刘军民. 直接Z-scheme光催化复合体系: 金属有机卟啉笼负载于g-C₃N₄中以增强光解水产氢活性[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(8): 2249-2258.
[6]	熊胜, 汤榕菂, 龚道新, 邓垚成, 郑蒋夫, 李玲, 周展鹏, 杨丽华, 苏龙. 环保型碳纳米材料在光催化制氢方面的应用[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(7): 1719-1748.
[7]	张美玉, 秦朝朝, 孙万军, 董聪朝, 钟俊, 吴凯丰, 丁勇. 双助催化剂负载CdS的能量捕集和电荷分离增强产H₂[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(7): 1818-1829.
[8]	张少波, 黄辉庭, 张之杰, 冯建勇, 刘宗光, 王军转, 徐骏, 李朝升, 余林蔚, 陈坤基, 邹志刚. 超薄三维径向结叠层高开启电位(1.15V)光阴极用于太阳能制氢[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(7): 1842-1850.
[9]	李旭力, 李宁, 高旸钦, 戈磊. 中空纳米材料的构建原理及其在光催化制氢和二氧化碳还原反应中的应用[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(3): 679-707.
[10]	孙龙, 李铃铃, 杨娟, 范佳杰, 徐全龙. 构建S型异质结COF/CdS以增强太阳光产氢[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(2): 350-358.
[11]	黄婷, 陈佳琪, 张莉莉, Alireza Khataee, 韩巧凤, 刘孝恒, 孙敬文, 朱俊武, 潘书刚, 汪信, 付永胜. 前驱体改性法制备薄层多孔富氨基的石墨相氮化碳用于光催化降解RhB和光催化制氢[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(2): 497-506.
[12]	蒋洁, 王国宏, 邵琰池, 王娟, 周双, 苏耀荣. 增强制氢性能的ZnO@ZnS空心微球S型异质结光催化剂[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(2): 329-338.
[13]	彭聪, 韩利晓, 黄金铭, 汪圣尧, 张晓虎, 陈浩. C₃N₅光催化制氢性能的系统研究[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(2): 410-420.
[14]	靳治良, 李红英, 李俊柯. 硫化钴改性石墨炔构建S型异质结高效光催化产氢[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(2): 303-315.
[15]	John Daniel McCool, Shiyuan Zhang, Inen Cheng, Xuan Zhao. 合理开发地球含量丰富金属的分子配合物用于电催化制氢[J]. 催化学报, 2022, 43(12): 3019-3045.