氧化还原驱动的高活性Pd/PdO表面界面促进低温甲烷燃烧

doi:10.1016/S1872-2067(24)60021-5

催化学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 60: 242-252.DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(24)60021-5

氧化还原驱动的高活性Pd/PdO表面界面促进低温甲烷燃烧

谈源龙^a^,^b, 张亚峰^a, 高雅^c^,¹, 马静远^d, 赵晗^a, 顾青青^a, 苏杨^a, 徐晓燕^e, 王爱琴^a^,^f, 杨冰^a^,^*(), 张国旭^c^,^*(), 刘晓艳^a^,^*(), 张涛^a^,^b

^a中国科学院大连化学物理研究所, 中国科学院航天催化材料重点实验室, 辽宁大连 116023
^b中国科学院大学, 北京 100049
^c哈尔滨工业大学化工与化学学院, 新能源转化与存储关键材料工业和信息化部重点实验室, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150001
^d中国科学院上海高等研究院, 上海同步辐射光源, 上海 201204
^e中国科学院大连化学物理研究所, 中国科学院洁净能源创新研究院, 辽宁大连 116023
^f中国科学院大连化学物理研究所, 催化基础国家重点实验室, 辽宁大连 116023

收稿日期:2024-01-11 接受日期:2024-03-22 出版日期:2024-05-18 发布日期:2024-05-20
通讯作者: *电子信箱: byang@dicp.ac.cn (杨冰), zhanggx@hit.edu.cn (张国旭), xyliu2003@dicp.ac.cn (刘晓艳).
作者简介:第一联系人：¹共同第一作者.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金单原子催化中心(22388102);中国科学院洁净能源创新研究院合作基金(DNL202002);中国科学院前沿科学重点研究计划(ZDBS-LY-7012);国家自然科学基金(22102180);国家自然科学基金(22072151);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(20720220009);中国科学院战略性先导专项(XDB0540000);中国博士后科学基金(2023M733452);中国科学院大连化学物理研究所创新基金(DICP I202107);中国科学院基础研究青年项目(YSBR-022);大连化学物理研究所-卡迪夫大学“单原子催化二氧化碳还原”联合研究中心项目(121421ZYLH20230008)

Redox-driven surface generation of highly active Pd/PdO interface boosting low-temperature methane combustion

Yuanlong Tan^a^,^b, Yafeng Zhang^a, Ya Gao^c^,¹, Jingyuan Ma^d, Han Zhao^a, Qingqing Gu^a, Yang Su^a, Xiaoyan Xu^e, Aiqin Wang^a^,^f, Bing Yang^a^,^*(), Guo-Xu Zhang^c^,^*(), Xiao Yan Liu^a^,^*(), Tao Zhang^a^,^b

^aCAS Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Applied Catalysis, iChEM Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China
^bUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
^cMIIT Key Laboratory of Critical Materials Technology for New Energy Conversion and Storage, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China
^dShanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201204, China
^eDalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China
^fState Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Dalian 116023, Liaoning, China

Received:2024-01-11 Accepted:2024-03-22 Online:2024-05-18 Published:2024-05-20
Contact: *E-mail: byang@dicp.ac.cn (B. Yang), zhanggx@hit.edu.cn(G. Zhang), xyliu2003@dicp.ac.cn (X. Liu).
About author:First author contact:¹Contributed equally to this work.
Supported by:
NSFC Center for Single-Atom Catalysis(22388102);DNL Cooperation Fund, CAS(DNL202002);Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS(ZDBS-LY-7012);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22102180);National Natural Science Foundation of China(22072151);Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(20720220009);Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDB0540000);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2023M733452);Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics(DICP I202107);CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research(YSBR-022);DICP.CAS-Cardiff Joint Research Units(121421ZYLH20230008)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

天然气汽车尾气中尚未充分燃烧的甲烷是一种典型的温室气体之一, 其温室效应远超二氧化碳, 达到后者的20倍以上. 因此, 减少甲烷的排放对于有效应对气候变化至关重要. 目前, 以Pd/Al₂O₃为基础催化剂的催化燃烧反应, 已被证实为减少甲烷排放的最为切实可行的技术手段. 深入了解钯基催化剂的活性结构不仅有助于合理设计高效的催化体系, 还能在很大程度上减少贵金属钯的使用量. 然而, 在甲烷燃烧反应过程中, 由于氧化还原气氛的复杂性, Pd金属的表面容易转变为不同结构, 这增加了研究其活性结构的难度. 此外, 催化剂的制备方法、载体的性质、预处理的气氛以及温度等因素均会对Pd的价态和粒径效应产生影响, 使得Pd基催化剂在甲烷燃烧反应中的活性结构至今仍存在争议.

为了深入研究这一问题, 本文选用商业化的纳米级γ-Al₂O₃作为载体, 采用易于工业化应用的浸渍法制备了Pd/Al₂O₃催化剂, 并研究其在低温(200‒400 °C)贫燃条件下的活性结构. 球差电镜结果表明, 催化剂中的Pd纳米颗粒在不同气氛中经800 °C高温预处理后呈现出不同的结构特点. 氦气处理后的催化剂中, Pd以完全金属态的形式存在; 氧气处理后的催化剂中, Pd以PdO的形式存在; 甲烷燃烧反应气处理后的催化剂中, PdO大颗粒上存在金属Pd小颗粒, 呈现出“荔枝型”Pd/PdO结构. 准原位X射线光电子能谱和原位X射线吸收谱等结果表明, “荔枝型”Pd/PdO结构是在甲烷燃烧反应中受氧化还原气氛诱导形成的. 该独特的“荔枝型”Pd/PdO结构的催化剂在300 °C甲烷燃烧反应中, 表现出337.8 μmol g_Pd^‒1 s^‒1的反应速率, 分别是纯金属Pd和PdO型催化剂反应速率的10.7倍和15.5倍. 进一步研究表明, 无论催化剂中Pd的初始状态为金属态或是氧化态, 高活性的“荔枝型”Pd/PdO结构都可以在较低温度(500 °C)的长时间(12 h)甲烷燃烧反应中缓慢生成. 通过调节预处理气氛中甲烷与氧气的相对浓度, 可以实现689.2 μmol g_Pd^‒1 s^‒1的反应速率, 高于文献已报道的Pd基催化剂在相似反应条件下的活性. 密度泛函理论计算结果表明, 相对于金属Pd和PdO, 甲烷在Pd/PdO界面处表现出最低(0.40 eV)的自由能势垒, 这表明由于界面处金属Pd和PdO的协同作用, 甲烷断裂第一个C‒H键的解离活化过程更容易发生, 从而解释了“荔枝型”Pd/PdO结构高催化活性的来源.

综上, 本文通过先进的球差电镜和原位光谱表征技术, 为深入认识甲烷燃烧钯基催化剂活性结构提供了新的角度. 研究发现, 反应过程中因气氛诱导而生成的高活性结构可能是重要的活性中心, 这一观点不仅有助于理解甲烷燃烧反应的机理, 而且可以为其他氧化还原催化体系的研究以及工业催化剂的设计制备提供参考.

关键词: 原位表征, 纳米颗粒, 钯, 甲烷燃烧, 界面

Abstract:

The supported Pd catalyst has been a benchmark for methane elimination. However, the active structures have been long under debate. Here, by the aberration-corrected high angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy, operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy and quasi in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, we revealed the two-dimensional metallic Pd bumps on the PdO surface (litchi-like structure) generated by the redox atmosphere under the lean condition as a highly active structure of the Pd/Al₂O₃ catalyst. The substantially increased Pd/PdO interfaces boost the methane combustion activity higher than the similar catalysts reported previously, and remarkably enhance the reaction rate by 15.5 and 10.7 times that of pure PdO or metallic Pd counterpart under lean condition at 300 °C, respectively. Density-functional theory calculations confirm the synergistic C-C bond activation of methane on the Pd/PdO interfaces. Our work provides new insight into the traditional understanding of the chemical state and particle size effects of the industrial Pd catalysts for methane oxidation.

Key words: In situ characterization, Nanoparticles, Palladium, Methane combustion, Interface

谈源龙, 张亚峰, 高雅, 马静远, 赵晗, 顾青青, 苏杨, 徐晓燕, 王爱琴, 杨冰, 张国旭, 刘晓艳, 张涛. 氧化还原驱动的高活性Pd/PdO表面界面促进低温甲烷燃烧[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 60: 242-252.

Yuanlong Tan, Yafeng Zhang, Ya Gao, Jingyuan Ma, Han Zhao, Qingqing Gu, Yang Su, Xiaoyan Xu, Aiqin Wang, Bing Yang, Guo-Xu Zhang, Xiao Yan Liu, Tao Zhang. Redox-driven surface generation of highly active Pd/PdO interface boosting low-temperature methane combustion[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2024, 60: 242-252.

×
扫码分享

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/10.1016/S1872-2067(24)60021-5

https://www.cjcatal.com/CN/Y2024/V60/I5/242

图/表 9

Fig. 1. HAADF-STEM images and size distribution of the Pd/Al2O3-He-800 (A), Pd/Al2O3-O-800 (B), and Pd/Al2O3-rea-800 (C) catalysts. High-resolution HAADF-STEM images of Pd/Al2O3-He-800 (D), Pd/Al2O3-O-800 (E), and Pd/Al2O3-rea-800 catalysts (F). (G) The magnified part marked with red box in (F).

Fig. 2. XRD patterns of three aged catalysts after different pretreatments.

Fig. 3. Light-off curves (A) and Arrhenius plots (B) of methane combustion on the Pd/Al2O3-rea-800, Pd/Al2O3-He-800, and Pd/Al2O3-O-800 catalysts.

Table 1 Comparison with literatures about the reaction rate of Pd-based catalysts for methane combustion.

Sample	Reaction rate (μmol g_Pd^-1 s^-1)	Temperature (°C)	Pd loading (wt%)	Size ^a (nm)	Reaction gas (vol %)		GHSV ^b (mL g^-1 h^-1)	Ref.
Sample	Reaction rate (μmol g_Pd^-1 s^-1)	Temperature (°C)	Pd loading (wt%)	Size ^a (nm)	CH₄	O₂	GHSV ^b (mL g^-1 h^-1)	Ref.
Pd/Al₂O₃-rea-800	337.8	300	1.0	28.4	0.5	2	1200000	This work
Pd/Al₂O₃-He-800	28.7	300	1.0	16.7	0.5	2	1200000	This work
Pd/Al₂O₃-O-800	20.3	300	1.0	36.3	0.5	2	1200000	This work
Pd/Al₂O₃-air-500	151.8	300	1.0	3.7	0.5	2	1200000	This work
Pd/Al₂O₃-rich-800	689.2	300	1.0	12.3	0.5	2	1200000	This work
1.9 nm Pd/γ-Al₂O₃	27.3	300	1.0	1.9	0.4	10	300000	[32]
Al-Pd/MA-A72	97.7	300	0.93	5.3	0.5	10	100000-200000	[50]
Pd/Al₂O₃	13.5	250	0.33	7.0	0.5	2	40000-75000	[51]
PdW₁/Al₂O₃	18.9	260	1.02	7.8	0.5	20	40000	[52]
Pd/Mg-Al₂O₃	139.0	290	1.6	2.9	1	20	120000	[53]
Pd/MA-800-5	95.6	320	0.5	2.8	1	5	50000	[54]
Pd(Au)/Al₂O₃-850	18.4	280	2.48	—	1	10	200000	[55]

Fig. 4. (A) The quasi in situ XPS results for the evolution of Pd 3d during alternative aging pretreatments. (B) Pd chemical states deconvoluted from XPS, and the corresponding reaction rate at 300 °C of various catalysts in (A).

Fig. 5. Fourier (A) and Wavelet (B) transformed k2-weighted EXAFS data (without phase correction) for the Pd/Al2O3 catalysts under different states during operando experiment. (C) The best-fitted results of the EXAFS data at Pd K-edge of different samples. CN, the coordination number. R, the average absorber-backscatterer distance. σ2, the Debye-Waller factor. ΔE0, the difference in zero kinetic energy values between the tested sample and the theoretical model. The accuracies of the above parameters were estimated as CN, ±20%; R, ±1%; σ2, ±20%. R-factor was used to quantify the mismatch of the fitting results. Data ranges: 3.0 ≤ k ≤ 12.0 ??1, 1.0 ≤ R ≤ 3.7 ?. (D) The XANES spectrum and linear combination fitting results of the activated Pd/Al2O3-rea-800 catalyst.

Fig. 6. DFT modeling of Pd active structures for methane C-H bond activation. Calculated energy profiles for the first C-H bond activation in methane on the Pd (111), Pd (100), PdO (101) and Pd6/PdO (101) catalysts. The big (blue) spheres represented Pd atoms, the red and gray spheres showed O and C atoms, and the smallest (white) spheres were H atoms.

Fig. 7. HAADF-STEM images of the Pd/Al2O3-air-500 (A), the Pd/Al2O3-H-300 (B), the spent Pd/Al2O3-air-500 (C), and the spent Pd/Al2O3-H-300 (D) catalysts.

Fig. 8. (A) Methane combustion stability tests of the Pd/Al2O3-air-500 and the Pd/Al2O3-H-300 catalysts at 400 °C under lean condition of 0.5% CH4/2% O2/97.5% He. (B) Arrhenius plots of methane combustion of the spent Pd/Al2O3-air-500 and the spent Pd/Al2O3-H-300 catalysts.

参考文献

[1]	M. Cargnello, J. J. D. Jaén, J. C. H. Garrido, K. Bakhmutsky, T. Montini, J. J. C. Gamez, Science, 2012, 337, 713-717.
[2]	T. Li, Y. Yao, Z. Huang, P. Xie, Z. Liu, M. Yang, J. Gao, K. Zeng, A.H. Brozena, G. Pastel, M. Jiao, Q. Dong, J. Dai, S. Li, H. Zong, M. Chi, J. Luo, Y. Mo, G. Wang, C. Wang, R. Shahbazian-Yassar, L. Hu, Nat. Catal., 2021, 4, 62-70.
[3]	E. D. Goodman, A. C. Johnston-Peck, E. M. Dietze, C. J. Wrasman, A. S. Hoffman, F. Abild-Pedersen, S. R. Bare, P. N. Plessow, M. Cargnello, Nat. Catal., 2019, 2, 748-755.
[4]	X. Yang, Q. Li, E. Lu, Z. Wang, X. Gong, Z. Yu, Y. Guo, L. Wang, Y. Guo, W. Zhan, J. Zhang, S. Dai, Nat. Commun., 2019, 10, 1611.
[5]	A. W. Petrov, D. Ferri, F. Krumeich, M. Nachtegaal, J. A. van Bokhoven, O. Kröcher, Nat. Commun., 2018, 9, 2545.
[6]	H. Xiong, D. Kunwar, D. Jiang, C. E. García-Vargas, H. Li, C. Du, G. Canning, X. I. Pereira-Hernandez, Q. Wan, S. Lin, S. C. Purdy, J. T. Miller, K. Leung, S. S. Chou, H. H. Brongersma, R. ter Veen, J. Huang, H. Guo, Y. Wang, A. K. Datye, Nat. Catal., 2021, 4, 830-839.
[7]	R. Burch, P. K. Loader, Appl. Catal. B, 1994, 5, 149-164.
[8]	J. K. Lampert, M. S. Kazi, R. J. Farrauto, Appl. Catal. B, 1997, 14, 211-223.
[9]	R. J. Farrauto, M. C. Hobson, T. Kennelly, E. M. Waterman, Appl. Catal. A, 1992, 81, 227-237.
[10]	P. Gélin, M. Primet, Appl. Catal. B, 2002, 39, 1-37.
[11]	D. Jiang, K. Khivantsev, Y. Wang, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 14304-14314.
[12]	S. K. Matam, M. H. Aguirre, A. Weidenkaff, D. Ferri, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2010, 114, 9439-9443.
[13]	H. Zhao, H. Li, Y. Tan, T. Liu, H. Zhang, Q. Zhang, H. Chen, Y. Zhao, X. Y. Liu, Appl. Catal. A, 2022, 637, 118597.
[14]	H. Zhao, Y. Tan, L. Kang, X. Pan, Y. Zhao, X. Y. Liu, Appl. Catal. A, 2022, 645, 118832.
[15]	H. Zhao, Y. Tan, L. Li, Y. Su, A. Wang, X.Y. Liu, T. Zhang, Chem. Eng. J., 2023, 451, 138937.
[16]	M. Gao, Z. Gong, X. Weng, W. Shang, Y. Chai, W. Dai, G. Wu, N. Guan, L. Li, Chin. J. Catal., 2021, 42, 1689-1699.
[17]	H. Xiong, M. H. Wiebenga, C. Carrillo, J. R. Gaudet, H. N. Pham, D. Kunwar, S. H. Oh, G. Qi, C. H. Kim, A. K. Datye, Appl. Catal. B, 2018, 236, 436-444.
[18]	H. Duan, R. You, S. Xu, Z. Li, K. Qian, T. Cao, W. Huang, X. Bao, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2019, 58, 12043-12048.
[19]	J. Nilsson, P.-A. Carlsson, S. Fouladvand, N. M. Martin, J. Gustafson, M. A. Newton, E. Lundgren, H. Grönbeck, M. Skoglundh, ACS Catal., 2015, 5, 2481-2489.
[20]	N. M. Kinnunen, J. T. Hirvi, M. Suvanto, T. A. Pakkanen, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2011, 115, 19197-19202.
[21]	J. Xu, L. Ouyang, W. Mao, X.-J. Yang, X.-C. Xu, J.-J. Su, T.-Z. Zhuang, H. Li, Y.-F. Han, ACS Catal., 2012, 2, 261-269.
[22]	K. Fujimoto, F. H. Ribeiro, M. Avalos-Borja, E. Iglesia, J. Catal., 1998, 179, 431-442.
[23]	N. M. Kinnunen, J. T. Hirvi, T. Venäläinen, M. Suvanto, T. A. Pakkanen, Appl. Catal. A, 2011, 397, 54-61.
[24]	R. J. Bunting, X. Cheng, J. Thompson, P. Hu, ACS Catal., 2019, 9, 10317-10323.
[25]	D. Gao, C. Zhang, S. Wang, Z. Yuan, S. Wang, Catal. Commun., 2008, 9, 2583-2587.
[26]	M. Wu, W. Li, X. Zhang, F. Xue, T. Yang, L. Yuan, ChemistrySelect, 2021, 6, 4149-4159.
[27]	M. Danielis, L. E. Betancourt, I. Orozco, N. J. Divins, J. Llorca, J. A. Rodríguez, S. D. Senanayake, S. Colussi, A. Trovarelli, Appl. Catal. B, 2021, 282, 119567.
[28]	S. Colussi, A. Trovarelli, E. Vesselli, A. Baraldi, G. Comelli, G. Groppi, J. Llorca, Appl. Catal. A, 2010, 390, 1-10.
[29]	A. K. Datye, J. Bravo, T. R. Nelson, P. Atanasova, M. Lyubovsky, L. Pfefferle, Appl. Catal. A, 2000, 198, 179-196.
[30]	H. Xiong, K. Lester, T. Ressler, R. Schlögl, L. F. Allard, A. K. Datye, Catal. Lett., 2017, 147, 1095-1103.
[31]	J. J. Willis, A. Gallo, D. Sokaras, H. Aljama, S. H. Nowak, E. D. Goodman, L. Wu, C. J. Tassone, T. F. Jaramillo, F. Abild-Pedersen, M. Cargnello, ACS Catal., 2017, 7, 7810-7821.
[32]	K. Murata, Y. Mahara, J. Ohyama, Y. Yamamoto, S. Arai, A. Satsuma, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2017, 56, 15993-15997.
[33]	J. Chen, J. Zhong, Y. Wu, W. Hu, P. Qu, X. Xiao, G. Zhang, X. Liu, Y. Jiao, L. Zhong, Y. Chen, ACS Catal., 2020, 10, 10339-10349.
[34]	D. Ciuparu, F. Bozon-Verduraz, L. Pfefferle, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2002, 106, 3434-3442.
[35]	Z. Boukha, A. Choya, M. Cortés-Reyes, B. d. Rivas, L. J. Alemany, J. R. González-Velasco, J. I. Gutiérrez-Ortiza, R. López-Fonseca, Appl. Catal. B, 2020, 277, 119280.
[36]	D. R. Fertal, M. Monai, L. Proaño, M. P. Bukhovko, J. Park, Y. Ding, B. M. Weckhuysen, A. C. Banerjee, Catal. Today, 2021, 382, 120-129.
[37]	W. Huang, A. C. Johnston-Peck, T. Wolter, W. D. Yang, L. Xu, J. Oh, B. A. Reeves, C. Zhou, M. E. Holtz, A. A. Herzing, A. M. Lindenberg, M. Mavrikakis, M. Cargnello, Science, 2021, 373, 1518-1523.
[38]	H. Yu, X. Wei, J. Li, S. Guo, S. Zhang, L. Wang, J. Ma, L. Li, Q. Gao, R. Si, F. Sun, Y. Wang, F. Song, H. Xu, X. Yu, Y. Zou, J. Wang, Z. Jiang, Y. Huang, Nucl. Sci. Technol., 2015, 26, 050102.
[39]	B. Ravel, M. Newville, J. Synchr. Radiat., 2005, 12, 537-541.
[40]	M. Munoz, P. Argoul, F. Farges, Am. Mineral., 2003, 88, 694-700.
[41]	G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. B, 1996, 54, 11169-11186.
[42]	J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, 77, 3865-3868.
[43]	G. Kresse, D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B, 1999, 59, 1758-1775.
[44]	H. J. Monkhorst, J. D. Pack, Phys. Rev. B, 1976, 13, 5188-5192.
[45]	G. Henkelman, B. P. Uberuaga, H. Jónsson, J. Chem. Phys., 2000, 113, 9901-9904.
[46]	Q. Xu, K. C. Kharas, B. J. Croley, A. K. Datye, ChemCatChem, 2011, 3, 1004-1014.
[47]	A. Chen, X. Yu, Y. Zhou, S. Miao, Y. Li, S. Kuld, J. Sehested, J. Liu, T. Aoki, S. Hong, M. F. Camellone, S. Fabris, J. Ning, C. Jin, C. Yang, A. Nefedov, C. Wöll, Y. Wang, W. Shen, Nat. Catal., 2019, 2, 334-341.
[48]	A. Parastaev, V. Muravev, E. H. Osta, T. F. Kimpel, J. F. M. Simons, A. J. F. van Hoof, E. Uslamin, L. Zhang, J. J. C. Struijs, D. B. Burueva, E. V. Pokochueva, K. V. Kovtunov, I. V. Koptyug, I. J. Villar-Garcia, C. Escudero, T. Altantzis, P. Liu, A. Béché, S. Bals, N. Kosinov, E. J. M. Hensen, Nat. Catal., 2022, 5, 1051-1060.
[49]	E. Garbowski, C. Feumi-Jantou, N. Mouaddib, M. Primet, Appl. Catal. A, 1994, 109, 277-291.
[50]	J. Yang, M. Peng, G. Ren, H. Qi, X. Zhou, J. Xu, F. Deng, Z. Chen, J. Zhang, K. Liu, X. Pan, W. Liu, Y. Su, W. Li, B. Qiao, D. Ma, T. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2020, 59, 18522-18526.
[51]	J. J. Willis, E. D. Goodman, L. Wu, A. R. Riscoe, P. Martins, C. J. Tassone, M. Cargnello, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 11989-11997.
[52]	Z. Hou, L. Dai, J. Deng, G. Zhao, L. Jing, Y. Wang, X. Yu, R. Gao, X. Tian, H. Dai, D. Wang, Y. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2022, 61, e202201655.
[53]	J. Chen, Y. Wu, W. Hu, P. Qu, X. Liu, R. Yuan, L. Zhong, Y. Chen, Mol. Catal., 2020, 496, 111185.
[54]	J. Lin, L. Zhao, Y. Zheng, Y. Xiao, G. Yu, Y. Zheng, W. Chen, L. Jiang, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2020, 12, 56095-56107.
[55]	N. Yang, Y. Zhao, H. Zhang, W. Xiang, Y. Sun, S. Yang, Y. Sun, G. Zeng, K. Kato, X. Li, M. Yamauchi, Z. Jiang, Cell Reports Phys. Sci., 2021, 2, 100287.
[56]	M. Brun, A. Berthet, J. Bertolini, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 1999, 104, 55-60.
[57]	A. M. Beale, B. M. Weckhuysen, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2010, 12, 5562-5574.
[58]	C. Dong, Z. Gao, Y. Li, M. Peng, M. Wang, Y. Xu, C. Li, M. Xu, Y. Deng, X. Qin, F. Huang, X. Wei, Y.-G. Wang, H. Liu, W. Zhou, D. Ma, Nat. Catal., 2022, 5, 485-493.
[59]	F. Maurer, J. Jelic, J. Wang, A. Gänzler, P. Dolcet, C. Wöll, Y. Wang, F. Studt, M. Casapu, J.-D. Grunwaldt, Nat. Catal., 2020, 3, 824-833.
[60]	Y. Wang, Y.-Q. Su, E. J. M. Hensen, D. G. Vlachos, Chem. Mater., 2022, 34, 1611-1619.
[61]	G. Kwon, G. A. Ferguson, C. J. Heard, E. C. Tyo, C. Yin, J. DeBartolo, S. N. Seifert, R. E. Winans, A. J. Kropf, J. Greeley, R. L. Johnston, L. A. Curtiss, M. J. Pellin, S. Vajda, ACS Nano, 2013, 7, 5808-5817.
[62]	J. A. Alonso, M. J. López, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2022, 24, 2729-2751.
[63]	G. Ertl, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 3524-3535.
[64]	C. J. Zhang, P. Hu, J. Chem. Phys., 2002, 116, 322-327.
[65]	C. Q. Lv, K. C. Ling, G. C. Wang, J. Chem. Phys., 2009, 131, 144704.
[66]	A. Hellman, A. Resta, N. M. Martin, J. Gustafson, A. Trinchero, P. A. Carlsson, O. Balmes, R. Felici, R. van Rijn, J. W. Frenken, J. N. Andersen, E. Lundgren, H. Gronbeck, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2012, 3, 678-682.
[67]	Y. H. Chin, C. Buda, M. Neurock, E. Iglesia, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 15425-15442.
[68]	A. Antony, A. Asthagiri, J. F. Weaver, J. Chem. Phys., 2013, 139, 104702-104713.
[69]	P. K. Sajith, A. Staykov, M. Yoshida, Y. Shiota, K. Yoshizawa, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2020, 124, 13231-13239.
[70]	A. A. Rybakov, S. Todorova, D. N. Trubnikov, A. V. Larin, Dalton Trans., 2021, 50, 8863-8876.
[71]	J. A. Rodriguez, L. Feria, T. Jirsak, Y. Takahashi, K. Nakamura, F. Illas, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 3177-3186.
[72]	P. Lozano-Reis, R. Sayós, J. A. Rodriguez, F. Illas, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2020, 22, 26145-26154.
[73]	Q. Fu, H. Saltsburg, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, Science, 2003, 301, 935-938.
[74]	P. Castellazzi, G. Groppi, P. Forzatti, E. Finocchio, G. Busca, J. Catal., 2010, 275, 218-227.
[75]	D. Roth, P. Gelin, A. Kaddouri, E. Garbowski, M. Primet, E. Tena, Catal. Today, 2006, 112, 134-138.
[76]	O. Demoulin, G. Rupprechter, I. Seunier, B. Le Clef, M. Navez, P. Ruiz, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 20454-20462.
[77]	R. F. Hicks, H. Qi, M. L. Young, R. G. Lee, J. Catal., 1990, 122, 295-306.
[78]	P. Briot, M. Primet, Appl. Catal., 1991, 68, 301-314.

氧化还原驱动的高活性Pd/PdO表面界面促进低温甲烷燃烧

Redox-driven surface generation of highly active Pd/PdO interface boosting low-temperature methane combustion

RichHTML

PDF

Supporting Information

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

扫码分享

图/表 9

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈欢, 虞周楠, 杨冰, 张亚峰, 车春霞, 刘晓艳, 张峰, 韩伟, 温翯, 王爱琴, 张涛. 乙炔选择加氢反应中碳化钯的动态精细调控: 气氛和氧化锌助剂的作用[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 60(5): 190-200.
[2]	黄恪, 袁世诚, 梅荣艳, 杨歌, 白鹏, 郭海玲, 王纯正, Svetlana Mintova. Mo改性Pd/NaY催化剂用于甲醇间接氧化羰基化合成碳酸二甲酯[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 60(5): 327-336.
[3]	李洋, 王雄, 胡星盛, 胡彪, 田昇, 王丙昊, 陈浪, 陈广辉, 彭超, 申升, 尹双凤. 可循环Pd/TiO₂构筑及其紫外光催化苯甲醛与碘苯偶联合成二苯甲酮[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 59(4): 159-168.
[4]	李星局, 李峥, 冯四全, 宋宪根, 严丽, 母佳利, 袁乔, 宁丽丽, 陈维苗, 韩仲康, 丁云杰. 合金纳米颗粒原子级分散制备的双位点催化剂中单点Ag₁对Pd₁在炔烃双烷氧羰基化反应中的促进作用[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 59(4): 282-292.
[5]	王乐乐, 程文瑶, 王嘉鑫, 杨娟, 刘芹芹. 构筑共轭聚合物基S型异质结分子内和界面电场以实现高效光催化制氢[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 58(3): 194-205.
[6]	陈丽丽, 郝彦衡, 褚健意, 刘松, 白凤华, 罗文豪. 电催化硝酸根还原合成氨: 关于铁/铜基催化剂的研究展望[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 58(3): 25-36.
[7]	杜晓蕊, 黄一珂, 潘晓丽, 江训柱, 苏杨, 杨静怡, 郭亚琳, 韩冰, 文承彦, 王晨光, 乔波涛. “自上而下”构筑TiO₂与Pt纳米簇之间的活性界面I: 再分散过程和机制[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 58(3): 237-246.
[8]	杜晓蕊, 黄一珂, 潘晓丽, 江训柱, 苏杨, 杨静怡, 郭亚琳, 韩冰, 文承彦, 王晨光, 乔波涛. “自上而下”构筑TiO₂与Pt纳米簇之间的活性界面II: 催化一氧化碳氧化反应性能和机理[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 58(3): 247-254.
[9]	王志超, 王梦凡, 宦云飞, 钱涛, 熊杰, 杨成韬, 晏成林. 电催化二氧化碳与含氮小分子共还原的缺陷与界面工程[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 57(2): 1-17.
[10]	康馨, 余强敏, 张天昊, 胡书萁, 刘鹤鸣, 张致远, 刘碧录. 大电流密度过渡金属硫族化合物析氢催化剂界面工程展望[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 56(1): 9-24.
[11]	齐宴宾, 朱以华, 江宏亮, 李春忠. 通过NiMo氧化物-CoMo氧化物混合物衍生催化剂中的界面相互作用促进甲醇到甲酸盐的电催化氧化[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 56(1): 139-149.
[12]	王哲, 王春鹏, 陆冰, 陈志荣, 王勇, 毛善俊. 界面电子扰动促进的C-H键活化[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 56(1): 130-138.
[13]	王毅, 王硕, 付云凡, 桑佳琪, 臧一鹏, 魏鹏飞, 李合肥, 汪国雄, 包信和. CuPc/FeNC双组分催化剂协同催化硝酸盐转化为氨[J]. 催化学报, 2024, 56(1): 104-113.
[14]	刘勇, 赵晓丽, 隆昶, 王晓艳, 邓邦为, 李康璐, 孙艳娟, 董帆. 原位构筑动态Cu/Ce(OH)_x界面用于高活性、高选择性和高稳定性硝酸盐还原合成氨[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 52(9): 196-206.
[15]	乔蔚, 于立策, 常进法, 杨甫林, 冯立纲. MoSe₂纳米片耦合Pt纳米颗粒用于高效双功能催化甲醇辅助水电解制氢[J]. 催化学报, 2023, 51(8): 113-123.